=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-2336/MMHS2018_paper_5
|storemode=property
|title=
Innovation in Digital Health and Care in Scotland
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2336/MMHS2018_paper_5.pdf
|volume=Vol-2336
|authors=Elizabeth Brooks
}}
==
Innovation in Digital Health and Care in Scotland==
https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2336/MMHS2018_paper_5.pdf
Innovation in Digital Health and Care in Scotland
Elizabeth Brooks1
1 Digital Health and Care Institute, Glasgow School of Art, Glasgow G3 6RQ, UK
Abstract. This paper describes a design led innovation initiative in Scotland
involving the Scottish Access Collaborative and the Digital Health & Care
Institute. The Cabinet Secretary for Health and Sport in Scotland launched the
Scottish Access Collaborative in November of 2017. A key strand of the
Collaborative’s work is the delivery of the Specialty Sub-Group program, in
which a range of experts in clinical specialties undertake a cycle of design led
workshops. The Digital Health and Care Institute (DHI) was commissioned to
design these workshops aimed at producing high level mapping of each clinical
area and identifying clinically led and patient centered sustainable improvements.
The findings from these workshops will form the basis of a specialty-led Access
Collaborative program delivering solutions to help scheduled care services to
sustainably meet the challenges of the future.
Keywords: Outpatients, Innovation, design led workshops.
1 Introduction
In the past half century spending on healthcare across virtually all countries regardless
of how they are funded and organized has increased substantially [1]. However rising
demand for these services will now take place in the environment of constrained public
spending causing what the Christie Commission in Scotland described as the most
serious challenge since the inception of the welfare state [2].
One of the challenges faced by those planning innovation in response to this challenge
in health and social care is the complexity of the existing systems. Any health and social
care system involves many institutions, professions and funding streams being brought
together to cooperate in serving the individual when that person is at their most
vulnerable. Historically these institutions which may be nationally, or locally organized
have not developed such that they work together seamlessly digitally. IT systems have
been procured without the requirement that they operate in an open manner and in many
cases, this has resulted in challenges in digital communication both between functional
areas and between geographical regions.
It is unsurprising, given the complexity of the systems and processes involved, that
individuals working in this field can find it difficult to gain a high level understanding
of the system as a whole. Misunderstandings and assumptions can grow and when
2
improvements are described they may be effective for the immediate context but have
unintended impacts on other parts of the system.
Digital innovation has been offered as one response to the rising demand on services.
On, April 25, 2018 the Scottish Government launched Scotland's Digital Health and
Care Strategy - Enabling, Connecting and Empowering [3]. The Executive Summary
of the strategy states that: “Digital technology is increasingly a part of our everyday
lives. Digital has the opportunity to transform the way in which we interact with public
services such as health and care, sustaining, reshaping and improving our health and
care services for the future. Digital will be central in addressing the challenges and
realizing the opportunities we face in health and social care, and in improving health
and wellbeing, achieving tailored, person-centered care and improving outcomes. The
new Strategy sets out the key priorities in achieving that ambition, and our intended
collaborative work in delivering those objectives.”
As one of a small number of innovation centers in Scotland, The Digital Health & Care
Institute (DHI), has been funded with a specific remit in digital innovations in health
and care.
2 The Digital Health and Care Institute
The DHI is a collaboration between the University of Strathclyde and the Glasgow
School of Art and is funded by the Scottish Funding Council and Scottish Government.
DHI supports innovation between academia, the public and third sectors and businesses
in the area of health and care. The Glasgow School of Art brings design and innovation
experience and research to the DHI. This approach is supported by Besset and Maher
who argue that a potentially valuable toolkit in the development of radical service
improvements in healthcare can be found in the field of design methods. “By their
nature design tools are used to help articulate needs and give them shape and form; as
such are critical to the front end of any innovation process”[4].
For a number of years design researchers have been working within DHI developing
and researching Experience Labs as a participatory approach to harness the lived
experience of participants in a creative environment and to co-create sustainable
innovation in response to healthcare challenges [5]. The participatory design approach
taken in the Experience Labs can be used to respond directly to the observation of
McCarthy et al that to date patient experience has traditionally received less attention
than performance and regulation constraints goals which has led to subpar results
overall [6].
The need to innovate within healthcare is clear but the context from which we are
starting is challenging and new approaches are required. The ongoing work within the
Scottish Access Collaborative is using a design led approach to address just this
challenge and create sustainable solutions.
3
3 The Scottish Access Collaborative
The Cabinet Secretary for Health and Sport launched the Scottish Access Collaborative
in November of 2017 [7]. This will be closely aligned with the Regional Planning,
Realistic Medicine , Elective Centers Programme and extant Performance Management
and Clinical Priorities, Delivery Activities and Programs. In the complex landscape of
healthcare planning and delivery the Access Collaborative will focus on developing
collaborations which build on existing work streams and networks to sustainably
balance demand and capacity. The Collaborative is led by Professor Derek Bell, Chair
of the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, and Paul Hawkins, Chief Executive of
NHS Fife and is made up of a range of professional bodies including the Scottish
Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, patient representatives and service leaders. The
Collaborative has developed six fundamental principles which will shape and prioritize
the way services are provided in the future The six key principles, agreed by the
Collaborative Founding Group, that will form the basis for redesigned services and
target resources to deliver the required and sustainable transformation of elective
services in the future are:
1. Patients should not be asked to travel unless there is a clear clinical benefit,
and that any changes should not increase the workload for primary, secondary
or social care in an unplanned/unresourced way.
2. All referrals should either be vetted by a consultant/senior decision maker or
processed via a system wide agreed pathway.
3. Referral pathways (including self-management) should be clear and published
for all to see
4. Each hospital and referral system should have a joint and clear understanding
of demand and capacity
5. Each local system should have a clear understanding of access to diagnostics
as part of pathway management
6. Improved and published metrics including how we record and measure virtual/
tele-health / tech-enabled care [8].
A key strand of the Collaborative’s work is the delivery of the Specialty Sub-Group
program, in which a range of experts in clinical specialties undertake a cycle of design-
led workshops with the support of the Digital Health and Care Institute.
Building on previous deliverables in the area of health and care innovation, the DHI
has been commissioned to design workshops aimed at producing high level mapping
for 12 clinical areas, identifying clinically led and patient centered sustainable
improvements. The findings from these workshops will form the basis of a specialty-
led Access Collaborative program delivering solutions to help scheduled care services
to sustainably meet the challenges of the future.
4
4 Visualisation and Mapping
Design and design research has much to offer in both the understanding of complex
systems and the visualizations of those systems [9],[10]. Visualisation of the system
allows clear and unambiguous understanding of a system and the design team chose to
develop a high level map with the workshop participants. This map acts as both tool
within the workshop to illicit and agree process flow and an artifact from the workshop
which will be used in the final report.
The team had a number of options open to them when considering mapping techniques.
Commonly used tools include journey maps which depict the healthcare service from
the perspective of the patient [11] and storyboards which use a series of images to
represent user's interaction with a system have also been used [12]. In addition, software
design tools such as Unified Modeling Language (UML) which have been used in
visualizing and communicating the model of a healthcare information system from the
user’s perspective could also have been used [13]. The team were also building on the
participatory design tools, experience and research developed in the course of the DHI
Experience Labs [5].
There are also representations of pathways or decisions trees which are currently
available at both national level in Scotland [14] and the UK [15]. In addition to these
some clinical areas have developed their own, for example the area of dermatology has
developed patient pathways [16] and third sector organizations such as Diabetes UK
have also produced specialist pathways [17]. Differences in the audience and aim for
these visualizations has resulted in a variation in the forms of representation and
language.
An additional factor when considering the development of this map was the question
of scale. As with conventional cartography, a decision has to be made as to what will
be represented in any map and most importantly, what will not. If you are driving from
London to Edinburgh and use a paper map you will need one which is small enough to
comfortably open in the confines of a car but has all the major routes you need. The
complexity of the healthcare processes means that process maps, if accurate for every
step taken, can become so crowded that they become much harder to read. The purpose
of and audience for the map is key in deciding what is represented and how it is
represented.
5 Design-Led Workshops
The design team have developed a bespoke approach and set of tools for the design-led
workshops that enabled all the relevant stakeholders to contribute their experiences of
current services and ideas for the future.
5
Tools were designed to be used by the participants of the workshop, which included
clinicians from primary and secondary care, hospital managers, patients and
representatives from the 3rd sector from across Scotland. It was observed that the
participants were describing regional variation in practice adding an additional
challenge for the mapping.
In order to keep the visualization as simple as possible high level actions such as
Consultation and Diagnostics were selected as the building blocks for the mapping. In
this way the core action was mapped while allowing for variation in who (for example
advanced nurse practitioner or consultant) carried out that action. This allowed for
visual clarity in the steps which were common for all regions while still containing
enough detail to identify and agree areas to focus on.
Having developed a method to map the steps in the process the team then faced the
challenge of deciding whether to attempt a map covering all patients in a clinical area
or to add a stratification or classification. Since this work is aimed at Outpatients only
it was decided to begin with a step to identify common symptoms patients most
commonly present with when being referred from primary care into secondary care
while noting their importance. Selecting the symptoms rather than the diagnoses
allowed us to map the patient journey which started with a particular symptom but may
have led to one of a number of different diagnoses.
High level pathways were mapped for each symptom and focus areas were agreed and
added to the map. Further discussion around these focus areas led to suggestions for
sustainable improvement.
The SAC workshops will take place between March 2018 and March 2019 and will
cover at 12 clinical areas including Cardiology, Urology, Gynecology, Respiratory,
Gastroenterology, Dermatology, Ear Nose and Throat, Neurology and Chronic Pain. At
the time of writing the Cardiology workshops have taken place and the report is
available.
6 Cardiology Specialism
The participants of the Cardiology Specialty Sub-Group came from 14 different
specialists areas and 6 different National Health Service (NHS) Board areas from across
Scotland. Additional input was noted from the two northern NHS Board areas, giving
the Sub-Group both a broad geographic and functional reach. The participants for the
workshop represented patients, primary care, different clinical roles in secondary care,
hospital managers and in later workshops, the third sector.
Following the method above, four symptoms were identified and the high level process
map designed. These included palpitations, fainting, shortness of breath and chest pain.
There was general agreement from the clinicians who carry out the vetting that these
6
were the most common symptoms. Attempts were made to cross check this with the
data from the digital referral system however this did not record symptom information
in a structured form. The participants in the workshop then agreed and recorded focus
areas for each symptom. For example for chest pain it was recorded that some patients
were being brought back for follow up appointments unnecessarily and there was a
lack of referral guidance for General Practitioners when making a decision on whether
to refer a patient for an ECG.
After moving on to the focus areas further actions were agreed and discussed further.
Seven areas are described in the report. Of these areas it is expected that four of them
will recur in other specialist clinical areas and three were specific to Cardiology. An
example of one area which was identified and is now a stated aim for the Scottish
Government is dedicated time and resource for enhanced vetting. In the case of this
improvement one of the participants in the workshop could describe the benefits of this
approach which had been implemented locally.
The Cardiology report which has been published and is available through the NHS [18].
The suggested improvements ranged from virtual consultations and push notifications
of test results to diagnostic clusters, specialist nurse-led pathways and patient led
follow-up. Across all symptoms dedicated time for vetting was seen as key to ensuring
patients were offered appropriate pathways, reducing unnecessary referral into
secondary care. There was agreement that the addition of guidance on referral criteria
would reduce inappropriate referrals. The opportunity for a joint Cardiology and
Respiratory pathway was noted, potentially reducing the time taken to find the correct
pathway for patients with breathlessness. Supported patient led follow-up was
identified as an improvement preventing patients returning unnecessarily for routine
follow-up. Work to further scope these improvements will be undertaken in the coming
months allowing a prioritization process to take place through the Access Collaborative.
Future work will involve national support to ensure the Cardiology community, along
with primary care partners are supported to make the necessary changes to ensure
efficient and effective patient pathways are achieved. It is envisaged that the work areas
will be taken forward either through the Cardiology community itself or for broader
issues which are not specialty specific, be achieved through the SAC Combined Action
Group (CAG).
References
1. Appleby, J.: Rises in Healthcare: spending where will it end? British Medical Journal BMJ
2012;345e7127(2012)
2. Christie C. (2015) Commission on the Future delivery of public services. Scottish
Government publications ISBN 978178045214
3. Scottish Government scot.gov. (2018). Scotland's Digital Health and Care Strategy.
[online] Available at: https://beta.gov.scot/blications/scotlands-digital-health-care-strategy-
enabling-connecting-empowering/, last accessed 2018/10/5.
7
4. Bessant J. & Maher L.: Developing Radical Service Innovations in Healthcare – The Role
of Design Methods: International Journal of Innovation Management VOL13(4)pp555-568
(2009)
5. French T.,Teal G.,Ramen S., (2016) Experience Labs; co-creating health and care
innovations using design tools and artefacts. 2016 Design Research Society Conference.
6. McCarthy S., O’Raghallaigh P., Woodworth S., Lim Y., Kenny C. & Adam F., (2016) An
integrated patient journey mapping tool for embedding quality in healthcare service reform,
Journal of Decision Systems, 25;sup1, 354-368
7. Scottish Government News. (2018). New initiative to tackle waiting times. [online]
Available at: https://news.gov.scot/news/new-initiative-to-tackle-waiting-times, last
accessed 2018/10/5
8. Scottish Access Collaborative (2018) The Six Principles Available at:
https://learn.nes.nhs.scot/3575/scottish-government-health-and-social-care-
resources/scottish-access-collaborative-making-connections-for-staff-and-patients/the-six-
principles, last accessed 2018/10/20
9. Segelstrom F., (2009) Communicating through Visualisations: Service Designers on
Visualizing User Research: First Nordic Conference on Service Design and Service
Innovation.
10. Sevaldson B., (2011) Giga-Mapping: Visualisation for Complexity and Systems thinking in
Design; Nordic Design Research Conference.
11. Trebble, T., Hansi, N., Hydes, T., Smith, M. A. & Baker, M. (2010). Process mapping the
patient journey: an introduction. BMJ, 341, c4078, 394-401.
12. Maguire, M., (2001). Methods to support human-centred design. International Journal of
Human-Computer Science, 55(4), 587-634
13. Aggarwal, V., (2002) The Application of the Unified Modeling Language in Object Oriented
Analysis of Healthcare Information Systems. Journal of Medical Systems 26(5)
14. SIGN (2018), Current Guidelines http://www.sign.ac.uk/ourguidelines.html, last accessed
2018/10/20
15. NICE (2014), Developing NICE guidelines: the manual.
http://nice.org.uk/media/default/about/what-we-do/our-programmes/developing -nice-
guidelines-the-manual.pdf, last accessed 2018/10/20
16. NHS Dermatology (2018) Dermatology Patient Pathways,
http://www.dermatology.nhs.scot/dermatology-pathways/, last accessed 2018/10/20
17. Diabetes UK (2017) Footcare Pathway. http://shop.diabetes.org.uk/products/footcare-
pathway, last accessed 2018/10/20
18. Scottish Access Collaborative (2018) http://learn.nes.nhs.scot/2970/scottish-government-
health-and-social-care-resources/scottish-access-collaborative-making-connections-for-
staff-and-patients last accessed 2018/10/28