<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xml:space="preserve" xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" 
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" 
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0 https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kermitt2/grobid/master/grobid-home/schemas/xsd/Grobid.xsd"
 xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<teiHeader xml:lang="en">
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt>
				<title level="a" type="main">Self-regulated learning and successful MOOC completion</title>
			</titleStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<publisher/>
				<availability status="unknown"><licence/></availability>
			</publicationStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<biblStruct>
					<analytic>
						<author role="corresp">
							<persName><forename type="first">Kseniia</forename><forename type="middle">A</forename><surname>Vilkova</surname></persName>
							<email>kvilkova@hse.ru</email>
							<affiliation key="aff0">
								<orgName type="institution">National Research University Higher School of Economics</orgName>
								<address>
									<settlement>Moscow</settlement>
									<country key="RU">Russia</country>
								</address>
							</affiliation>
						</author>
						<title level="a" type="main">Self-regulated learning and successful MOOC completion</title>
					</analytic>
					<monogr>
						<imprint>
							<date/>
						</imprint>
					</monogr>
					<idno type="MD5">BFBA24F834DBBF0AC91FD479E4662C61</idno>
				</biblStruct>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<encodingDesc>
			<appInfo>
				<application version="0.7.2" ident="GROBID" when="2023-03-24T10:22+0000">
					<desc>GROBID - A machine learning software for extracting information from scholarly documents</desc>
					<ref target="https://github.com/kermitt2/grobid"/>
				</application>
			</appInfo>
		</encodingDesc>
		<profileDesc>
			<textClass>
				<keywords>
					<term>massive open online-courses</term>
					<term>self-regulated learning</term>
					<term>educational outcomes</term>
				</keywords>
			</textClass>
			<abstract>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><p>MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) were considered as a disruptive innovation in education. However, they suffer from low completion rates. This raises a question about learning skills of MOOCs users. It was indicated that self-regulated learning (SRL) skills are critically important in online-environment because learners should plan, manage and control their learning activities in order to finish MOOC successfully. However, researches have not treated SRL in much detail. The research was conducted in 24 MOOCs offered by National Research University Higher School of Economics on the National Platform Open Education in 2017. A total of 2815 learners participated in the study and completed an online-survey, which consisted of demographic questions and the self-regulated learning questionnaire. This work builds on the SRL framework, proposed by Zimmerman, which describes learners' actions during the process of study. In this paper, a more detailed approach to access the association between SRL and educational outcomes of MOOCs learners was implemented. As a result, only one SRL phase, which is forethought, is statistically significant in the regression model, while performance and selfreflection do not predict learners' success. According to the research results, such SRL sub-processes as goal-setting, self-efficacy, and task value are the most helpful for MOOC completion. This conclusion can be useful for future interventions in MOOCs.</p></div>
			</abstract>
		</profileDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text xml:lang="en">
		<body>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="1">Introduction</head><p>A few years ago MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) were considered as a disruptive innovation in education. Advocates suggested that MOOCs will be successful in delivering educational resources to the masses <ref type="bibr" target="#b0">(Davis et al., 2016)</ref>. However, according to the research by Reich &amp; Ruipérez-Valiente (2019), MOOCs have failed the expectations: efforts to establish equal opportunities through MOOCs have not been successful. Moreover, MOOCs suffer from low completion rates: up to 90-98% of learners do not finish their courses <ref type="bibr" target="#b1">(Healy, 2017;</ref><ref type="bibr" target="#b7">Reich, 2014)</ref>.</p><p>The retention rate raises a question about learning skills of MOOCs users. For example, according to <ref type="bibr" target="#b3">Littlejohn et al. (2015)</ref>, there is a relationship between learners' selfregulated learning (SRL) skills and MOOCs completion. SRL skills are critically important in online-environment because learners should plan, manage and control their learning activities in order to finish MOOC successfully <ref type="bibr">(Wang, Shanonn, &amp; Ross, 2013)</ref>. Previous studies have reported that SRL skills predicted retention in MOOCs <ref type="bibr" target="#b6">(Milligan, Littlejohn, &amp; Margaryan, 2013)</ref>. Moreover, the ability to self-regulate learning process helped to achieve personal objectives in MOOCs (Kizilcec, Pérez-Sanagustín, &amp; Maldonado, 2017). Learners with stronger SRL skills were more active during MOOCs (Maldonado-Mahauad et al., 2018), they were more likely to revisit course materials (Kizilcec, Pérez-Sanagustín, &amp; Maldonado, 2017) and tended to use a more flexible approach to organize learning process <ref type="bibr" target="#b3">(Littlejohn et al., 2015)</ref>. However, researches have not treated SRL in much detail: they tend to use a sum variable instead of particular subscales, which were originally suggested. <ref type="bibr" target="#b10">Zimmerman (1990)</ref> proposed the SRL framework, it includes "self-generated thoughts, feelings, and actions that are planned and cyclonically adapted to the attainment of personal goals" <ref type="bibr">(Zimmerman &amp; Schunk, 2012</ref>). SRL can be described through actions, which learners perform when they study. As shown in Figure <ref type="figure" target="#fig_0">1</ref>, SRL consists of three phases or subscales: forethought, performance, and self-reflection. Each of the phases integrates affective, behavioral or cognitive sub-processes. Forethought phase includes goal setting, self-efficacy, and task value. Performance phase combines task strategies, interest enhancement, and help seeking. Self-reflection phase consists of such cognitive factors as self-satisfaction and self-evaluation. SRL skills can be successfully trained through prompts in MOOCs to provide learners with targeted help to lower psychological barriers. However, the impact of particular SRL skills on MOOC completion is unclear yet. The purpose of this study was to examine whether such SRL skills as forethought, performance, and self-reflection affect learners' educational outcomes.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2">Research methods</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.1">Methodology</head><p>The research was conducted in 24 MOOCs offered by National Research University Higher School of Economics on the National Platform Open Education in 2017. At the beginning of the online-courses learners were invited to participate in the pre-course survey. Within learning process, they completed weekly quizzes and the final test. In order to complete the course, learners should get a minimum required score and then purchase the verified certificate.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.2">Procedure and instruments</head><p>The invitation to the survey and the personalized links were emailed to MOOCs learners by Enjoy Survey mailing system. Learners completed an online survey that included demographic information and the SRL questionnaire. All data were collected anonymously: no names or other personal data were captured. The demographic questions included age, gender, educational level, and prior onlinelearning experience. The Russian version of the SRL questionnaire was adopted from the instrument validated by <ref type="bibr" target="#b4">Littlejohn et al. (2016)</ref>. The SRL questionnaire included 29 items that referred to three subscales: 11 items for forethought, 11 items for performance and 7 items for self-reflection. Learners responded to each item using a 4-point Likert scale that ranged from completely disagree (1) to completely agree (4).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.3">Sample</head><p>A total of 2815 learners participated in the study and completed an online-survey (response rate = 4.99%). The average age was 31 (SD = 10), 73% were females and 81% held a bachelor's or higher degree.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.4">Variables</head><p>The certification rate was rather low (8%), in this case, platform data on learners' grades on weekly quizzes was used as the outcome measure. The average score on quizzes ranged from 0 to 100 points with 60 as a threshold for successful completion. Since this variable was not normally distributed, it was recoded into a dichotomous variable, where 0 refers to the result lower than 60 points out of 100 and 1 is equal or higher than 60 points. The individual score for each SRL subscale was computed by averaging ratings of corresponded items. Table <ref type="table" target="#tab_0">1</ref> provides descriptive statistics for the data from the SRL questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha was estimated for the current sample at 0.81, ranging from 0.49 to 0.68 for the subscales. Age was used as a continuous variable, ranging from 13 to 79. Education level was coded as a dichotomous variable, where 0 is some school or post-secondary education and 1 is bachelor, master or Ph.D. Prior online experience was coded as a dichotomous variable, where 0 means lack of prior experience at online-learning, 1 means some experience at online-learning. This study examined a binary logistic regression model for learners' success in MOOCs, explained by SRL subscales and demographics. The following regression equation ( <ref type="formula">1</ref>) was suggested:</p><p>Ln (pi (probability of successful MOOC completion)/1pi) = β0 + β1 x forethought + β2 x performance + β3 x self-reflection + β4 x age + β5 x gender + β6 x educational level + β7 x prior online learning experience + εi (1)</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3">Research results</head><p>I begin with general observations about survey results and platform data on learners' grades. Scores on the SRL questionnaire range from 11 to 43.33, where higher scores indicate a higher level of SRL. About 42% of participants have prior online-learning experience. Average grades on weekly quizzes indicate that 45% of learners exceed the threshold of 60 points. Next, I looked at the effects of the SRL subscales on learners' success in MOOCs. To estimate the result I examine a binary logistic regression model, where learners' results is the outcome variable. The SRL subscales here are used as predictors and age, gender, level of education, prior online-learning experience as control variables. Table <ref type="table" target="#tab_2">3</ref> shows the results of the binary logistic regression model.  <ref type="figure">-8</ref>.16 Note: the dependent variable in this analysis is learners' educational outcomes coded as 0 is the result is lower the threshold of 60 points out of 100 and 1 is the result is equal or higher than 60 points χ 2 = 127.73 df = 7 p = 0.00 Pseudo R 2 = 0.03 N = 2815 ** p &lt; .01 The results of binary logistic regression leads to the following regression equation:</p><p>Ln (pi (probability of successful MOOC completion)/1pi) = -.27 + .03 x forethought + .01 x age -.07 x prior online learning experience (2) The results show that out of three SRL subscales only forethought is statistically significant at p &lt; .01. This indicates forethought subscale significantly predicts learners' success in MOOCs, taking into control demographics characteristics. To assess the effect of forethought subscale on the outcome variable, the other variables remain constant. The results of binary logistic regression shows that the odds to get 60 or points on weekly quizzes were 1.12 times higher for learners with a high level of forethought. Other subscales, which are performance and self-reflection, are not statistically significant in predicting learners' success in MOOCs. Such demographics as gender and education do not show any significant results either. However, older age and absence of prior online-learning experience increase chances to finish MOOC with 60 or more points.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4">Conclusions</head><p>This work builds on the SRL framework, proposed by Zimmerman, which describes learners' actions during the process of study. Like in prior research <ref type="bibr" target="#b6">(Milligan, Littlejohn, &amp; Margaryan, 2013)</ref>, level of SRL predicted course attainment. In this paper, a more detailed approach to access the association between SRL and educational outcomes of MOOCs learners was implemented. As a result, only one SRL phase, which is forethought, is statistically significant in the regression model, while performance and self-reflection do not predict learners' success. According to the research results, such SRL sub-processes as goal-setting, self-efficacy, and task value are the most helpful for MOOC completion. This conclusion can be useful for future interventions in MOOCs since SRL is not a fixed trait and it can be developed through practice <ref type="bibr" target="#b11">(Zimmerman, 2015)</ref>.</p></div><figure xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="fig_0"><head>Fig. 1 .</head><label>1</label><figDesc>Fig. 1. The self-regulated learning framework.Each of the phases integrates affective, behavioral or cognitive sub-processes. Forethought phase includes goal setting, self-efficacy, and task value. Performance phase combines task strategies, interest enhancement, and help seeking. Self-reflection phase consists of such cognitive factors as self-satisfaction and self-evaluation. SRL skills can be successfully trained through prompts in MOOCs to provide learners with targeted help to lower psychological barriers. However, the impact of particular SRL skills on MOOC completion is unclear yet. The purpose of this study was to examine whether such SRL skills as forethought, performance, and self-reflection affect learners' educational outcomes.</figDesc><graphic coords="2,136.05,411.88,314.83,140.15" type="bitmap" /></figure>
<figure xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" type="table" xml:id="tab_0"><head>Table 1 . Descriptive statistics for the SRL questionnaire.</head><label>1</label><figDesc></figDesc><table><row><cell>Subscale</cell><cell>SRL</cell><cell>sub-</cell><cell>Number</cell><cell>M</cell><cell>Cronbach's</cell></row><row><cell cols="2">processes</cell><cell></cell><cell>of items</cell><cell>(SD)</cell><cell>alpha</cell></row><row><cell>Forethought</cell><cell cols="2">Goal-setting</cell><cell>4</cell><cell>12.44</cell><cell>0.49</cell></row><row><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell>(1.96)</cell><cell></cell></row><row><cell></cell><cell cols="2">Self Efficacy</cell><cell>4</cell><cell>13.77</cell><cell>0.81</cell></row><row><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell>(2.01)</cell><cell></cell></row><row><cell></cell><cell>Task value</cell><cell></cell><cell>3</cell><cell>10.51</cell><cell>0.74</cell></row><row><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell>(1.50)</cell><cell></cell></row><row><cell>total average</cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell>11</cell><cell>12.24</cell><cell>0.68</cell></row><row><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell>(1.44)</cell><cell></cell></row><row><cell>Performance</cell><cell cols="2">Task strategies</cell><cell>5</cell><cell>15.81</cell><cell>0.63</cell></row><row><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell>(2.44)</cell><cell></cell></row><row><cell></cell><cell>Interest</cell><cell></cell><cell>3</cell><cell>10.44</cell><cell>0.79</cell></row><row><cell cols="2">enhancement</cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell>(1.55)</cell><cell></cell></row><row><cell></cell><cell cols="2">Help-seeking</cell><cell>3</cell><cell>6.87</cell><cell>0.51</cell></row><row><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell>(1.88)</cell><cell></cell></row><row><cell>total average</cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell>11</cell><cell>11.04</cell><cell>0.49</cell></row><row><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell>(1.40)</cell><cell></cell></row><row><cell>Self-reflection</cell><cell>Self-</cell><cell></cell><cell>4</cell><cell>11.63</cell><cell>0.69</cell></row><row><cell cols="2">satisfaction</cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell>(2.22)</cell><cell></cell></row><row><cell></cell><cell cols="2">Self-evaluation</cell><cell>3</cell><cell>9.99</cell><cell>0.68</cell></row><row><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell>(1.67)</cell><cell></cell></row><row><cell>total average</cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell>7</cell><cell>10.81</cell><cell>0.54</cell></row><row><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell>(1.63)</cell><cell></cell></row><row><cell>total SRL</cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell>29</cell><cell>34.09</cell><cell>0.81</cell></row><row><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell>(3.84)</cell><cell></cell></row><row><cell cols="6">Table 2 illustrates subscales and subscale-total correlations. The correlation between</cell></row><row><cell cols="6">subscales ranges from 0.56 to 0.64. The correlation between subscales and the total</cell></row><row><cell>SRL score exceeds 0.8.</cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell></row></table></figure>
<figure xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" type="table" xml:id="tab_1"><head>Table 2 . Correlations for the SRL subscales.</head><label>2</label><figDesc></figDesc><table><row><cell></cell><cell>Forethought</cell><cell>Performance</cell><cell>Self-reflection</cell></row><row><cell>Forethought</cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell></row><row><cell>Performance</cell><cell>0.56**</cell><cell></cell><cell></cell></row><row><cell>Self-reflection</cell><cell>0.64**</cell><cell>0.63**</cell><cell></cell></row><row><cell>total SRL</cell><cell>0.86**</cell><cell>0.85**</cell><cell>0.86**</cell></row><row><cell>Note:** p &lt; .01</cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell></row></table></figure>
<figure xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" type="table" xml:id="tab_2"><head>Table 3 . Binary logistic regression analysis for learners' success in MOOCs.</head><label>3</label><figDesc></figDesc><table><row><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell>OR</cell><cell>β</cell><cell>S.E.</cell><cell>z</cell></row><row><cell>SRL subscales</cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell></row><row><cell>forethought</cell><cell></cell><cell>1.12**</cell><cell>.03**</cell><cell>.01</cell><cell>8.54</cell></row><row><cell>performance</cell><cell></cell><cell>.97</cell><cell>-.01</cell><cell>.01</cell><cell>-2.33</cell></row><row><cell>self-reflection</cell><cell></cell><cell>.98</cell><cell>-.01</cell><cell>.02</cell><cell>-1.28</cell></row><row><cell cols="2">Control variables</cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell></row><row><cell>age</cell><cell></cell><cell>1.01**</cell><cell>.01**</cell><cell>.01</cell><cell>3.21</cell></row><row><cell>gender (1=male)</cell><cell></cell><cell>1.15</cell><cell>.03</cell><cell>.10</cell><cell>1.59</cell></row><row><cell cols="2">educational level (1=bachelor or</cell><cell>1.18</cell><cell>.04</cell><cell>.13</cell><cell>1.50</cell></row><row><cell>higher)</cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell></row><row><cell>prior</cell><cell>online-learning</cell><cell>.74**</cell><cell>-.07**</cell><cell>.06</cell><cell>-3.72</cell></row><row><cell>experience (1=yes)</cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell><cell></cell></row><row><cell>constant</cell><cell></cell><cell>.04**</cell><cell>-.27**</cell><cell>.01</cell><cell></cell></row></table></figure>
		</body>
		<back>
			<div type="references">

				<listBibl>

<biblStruct xml:id="b0">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Retrieval practice and study planning in MOOCs: Exploring classroom-based self-regulated learning strategies at scale</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">D</forename><surname>Davis</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">G</forename><surname>Chen</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">T</forename><surname>Van Der Zee</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">C</forename><surname>Hauff</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">G</forename><forename type="middle">J</forename><surname>Houben</surname></persName>
		</author>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="m">European conference on technology enhanced learning</title>
				<meeting><address><addrLine>Cham</addrLine></address></meeting>
		<imprint>
			<publisher>Springer</publisher>
			<date type="published" when="2016">2016</date>
			<biblScope unit="page" from="57" to="71" />
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b1">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Georgetown&apos;s First Six MOOCs: Completion, Intention, and Gender Achievement Gaps</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">P</forename><forename type="middle">A</forename><surname>Healy</surname></persName>
		</author>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">Undergraduate Economic Review</title>
		<imprint>
			<biblScope unit="volume">14</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="page">1</biblScope>
			<date type="published" when="2017">2017</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b2">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Selfregulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">R</forename><forename type="middle">F</forename><surname>Kizilcec</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">M</forename><surname>Pérez-Sanagustín</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">J</forename><forename type="middle">J</forename><surname>Maldonado</surname></persName>
		</author>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">Computers &amp; education</title>
		<imprint>
			<biblScope unit="volume">104</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="page" from="18" to="33" />
			<date type="published" when="2017">2017</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b3">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Designing MOOCs for professional learners: Tools and patterns to encourage self-regulated learning</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">A</forename><surname>Littlejohn</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">C</forename><surname>Milligan</surname></persName>
		</author>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">eLearning Papers</title>
		<imprint>
			<biblScope unit="volume">42</biblScope>
			<date type="published" when="2015">2015</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b4">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">A</forename><surname>Littlejohn</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">N</forename><surname>Hood</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">C</forename><surname>Milligan</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">P</forename><surname>Mustain</surname></persName>
		</author>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">The Internet and Higher Education</title>
		<imprint>
			<biblScope unit="volume">29</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="page" from="40" to="48" />
			<date type="published" when="2016">2016</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b5">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Mining theory-based patterns from Big data: Identifying self-regulated learning strategies in Massive Open Online Courses</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">J</forename><surname>Maldonado-Mahauad</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">M</forename><surname>Pérez-Sanagustín</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">R</forename><forename type="middle">F</forename><surname>Kizilcec</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">N</forename><surname>Morales</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">J</forename><surname>Munoz-Gama</surname></persName>
		</author>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="m">Proceedings of EMOOCs 2019: Work in Progress Papers of the Research, Experience and Business Tracks</title>
				<meeting>EMOOCs 2019: Work in Progress Papers of the Research, Experience and Business Tracks</meeting>
		<imprint>
			<date type="published" when="2018">2018</date>
			<biblScope unit="volume">80</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="page" from="179" to="196" />
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b6">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">C</forename><surname>Milligan</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">A</forename><surname>Littlejohn</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">A</forename><surname>Margaryan</surname></persName>
		</author>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching</title>
		<imprint>
			<biblScope unit="volume">9</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
			<date type="published" when="2013">2013</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b7">
	<monogr>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">J</forename><surname>Reich</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<ptr target="https://er.educause.edu/articles/2014/12/mooc-completion-and-retention-in-the-context-of-student-intent" />
		<title level="m">MOOC completion and retention in the context of student intent // EDUCAUSE Review Online</title>
				<imprint>
			<date type="published" when="2014">2014</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b8">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">The MOOC pivot</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">J</forename><surname>Reich</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">J</forename><forename type="middle">A</forename><surname>Ruipérez-Valiente</surname></persName>
		</author>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">Science</title>
		<imprint>
			<biblScope unit="volume">363</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="page" from="130" to="131" />
			<date type="published" when="2019">2019. 6423</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b9">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Students&apos; characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">C</forename><forename type="middle">H</forename><surname>Wang</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">D</forename><forename type="middle">M</forename><surname>Shannon</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">M</forename><forename type="middle">E</forename><surname>Ross</surname></persName>
		</author>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">Distance Education</title>
		<imprint>
			<biblScope unit="volume">34</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="page" from="302" to="323" />
			<date type="published" when="2013">2013</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b10">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview</title>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">B</forename><forename type="middle">J</forename><surname>Zimmerman</surname></persName>
		</author>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="j">Educational Psychologist</title>
		<imprint>
			<biblScope unit="volume">25</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
			<biblScope unit="page" from="3" to="17" />
			<date type="published" when="1990">1990</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b11">
	<monogr>
		<author>
			<persName><forename type="first">B</forename><forename type="middle">J</forename><surname>Zimmerman</surname></persName>
		</author>
		<ptr target="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080970868260601" />
		<title level="m">International encyclopedia of the social &amp; behavioral sciences</title>
				<imprint>
			<publisher>Elsevier</publisher>
			<date type="published" when="2015">2015</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
	<note>Self-regulated Learning: Theories, measures, and outcomes</note>
</biblStruct>

<biblStruct xml:id="b12">
	<analytic>
		<title level="a" type="main">Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice</title>
	</analytic>
	<monogr>
		<title level="m">Proceedings of EMOOCs 2019: Work in Progress Papers of the Research, Experience and Business Tracks</title>
				<editor>
			<persName><forename type="first">B</forename><forename type="middle">J</forename><surname>Zimmerman</surname></persName>
		</editor>
		<editor>
			<persName><forename type="first">D</forename><forename type="middle">H</forename><surname>Schunk</surname></persName>
		</editor>
		<meeting>EMOOCs 2019: Work in Progress Papers of the Research, Experience and Business Tracks</meeting>
		<imprint>
			<publisher>Springer Science &amp; Business Media</publisher>
			<date type="published" when="2012">2012</date>
		</imprint>
	</monogr>
</biblStruct>

				</listBibl>
			</div>
		</back>
	</text>
</TEI>
