The present article is devoted to the problems of creating linguistic tools for the virtual lexicographic laboratory of Spanish explanatory dictionary (DLE 23). The goal of the research is to consider some issues related to the development of linguistic tools for the virtual lexicographic laboratory. To achieve this goal the dictionary was analyzed to define the peculiarities of linguistic facts representation, its structure and metalanguage. On the basis of the dictionary analysis and the theory of lexicographic systems the formal model of DLE 23 was developed and its main components, including their relationships, were determined to ensure their availability via linguistic tools for accessing linguistic information. The range of research activities to be performed by using the linguistic tools was outlined.
Explanatory Dictionary of the Spanish Language (herein after DLE 23, Diccionario de la lengua española. Edición del tricentenario (23ª edición)), like other big explanatory lexicons, contains profound systemic language regularities, which, being almost hidden from the reader, play an important role in identifying linguisticallyinformative potential of the language.
In general, the properties of the language as a system, as well as their presentation in comprehensive dictionaries of explanatory type, are the object of many researches, for example [1; 2; 3; 4; 5]. In our opinion, such properties have the best representation in monolingual explanatory dictionaries. The article is focused on large, mostly multivolume lexicons, which contain the major part of the national lexicon and phraseology, and that are characterized by a detailed description of lexical-grammatical and lexical -semantic systems of the language. Due to the great amount, elaborated structure and completeness of a lexicographic description such dictionaries are carriers of a huge number of implicitly-defined linguistic, cognitive, logical and other relationships ( mostly uncontrolled), making this extensive lexicographical system a kind of “thingin-itself” [6].
This raises a question of the development of methodology and technology of creation of such lexicographical objects, and also a question of study a variety of effects that explicitly or implicitly operate there. From the beginning, we are talking about the methods of computational linguistics, because, as noted in the book “Computer lexicography” [6], it is physically impossible to perform such studies with a help of traditional methods. So, the first problem here is to create digital analogues of corresponding traditional lexicographic studies or convert them into digital form, followed by the explication of underlying systemic linguistic regularities. 2
The Ukrainian Lingua-Information Fund (Kyiv city), where studies devoted to this work had been conducted, developed a universal theoretical basis, focused on the construction of lexicographic objects of almost unlimited size and complexity, and on implementation of a profound study of the language systems. We are talking about a theory of lexicographic systems, using the theory the Fund designed and elaborated linguistic software tools to perform researches on the basis of the Ukrainian, Russian and Turkish language explanatory dictionaries [7; 8; 9], as well as the tools for etymological studies of the Ukrainian language [10].
Using these tools (and partly even before they had been created, but with approaches based on the theory of lexicographic systems), a number of studies were conducted and obtained a series of fundamentally new linguistic results for the Ukrainian language. Among these result we should mention a study and establishment of formal structure of headword rows of verb and noun (the Ukrainian language) [9; 10; 11; 12].
However, the developments of the Fund successfully applied to the Ukrainian, Russian and Turkish languages can’t be automatically used for the Spanish language for the following reasons: typological features of the Spanish language, among them are part-of-speech variation, dependability of lexical meaning on grammatical one, the possibility of acquiring lexical meaning by a word when it functions in the specific grammatical meaning; peculiarities of metalanguage and entry structure of DLE 23 to describe grammatical and lexical properties of Spanish language units. 3
The method of formal modeling of lexicographic objects like DLE 23 is based on the theory of lexicographical systems developed by Prof. Volodymyr Shyrokov. According to the theory of lexicographical systems, one of the most important relationships is “subject – object”. In this context we will note that the subject (designated by the symbol S) can be a person or a group of persons (lexicographers, linguists, experts etc.) and the object is a set of elementary information units (EIU) marked as IQ(D). In other words, when processing the EIUs in its mental apparatus, the subject acquires a set of their descriptions V (IQ(D)). It can be formally represented as: For each elementary unit x ∊ IQ(D) there is a description V(x) represented as a dictionary entry. In its turn, V(x) is an element of V(IQ(D)). Therefore, we can assert that V(IQ(D)) is DLE 23 comprised by the set of the entries V(x):
: ( ) → ( ( ))
( ( )) = ⋃ ∈ 〱( ) ( )
(
Within each A-word the A-subwords formed of the A-alphabet characters, are
possible to be distinguished. Let us designate the set of A-subwords as B[V(x)]. In case of
DLE 23 the A-subwords are as follows: 1) headword; 2) headword row; 3) headword
variants; 4) etymology; 5) irregular forms; 6) orthography; 7) definition block. All of
them compose the set B[V(x)]:
[ ( )] ≡ { ( ) | = 1,2, … }
(
Here βi(x) is an A-subword and i is an index number of an A-subword in the entry of
DLE 23. We’d like to note that the identification of βi(x)-elements is based on the
peculiarities of the dictionary metalanguage that clearly establishes the rules for the
representation of a particular element of the dictionary entry. Thus, we have defined
the first lexicographic structure to be induced within the set of descriptions V(IQ(D)):
Furthermore, β(х) will be the set of the structural elements of the entry V(х) devoted
to selected headword х:
( ( )) ≡ = { , 1,2, … }
(
: → [ ]
The entry is subdivided into the left and right parts. The left part is made up of a headword, headword row and information block. The letter contains headword variants, etymological information, orthography and word flection properties. The right part explains the meaning of the headword. The main and obligatory element is the definition. In case of lemmas with part-of-speech variation, the definitions are grouped according to the part of speech (grammatical category). The example of a dictionary entry is shown in Figure 1. Let us deeply analyze the peculiarities of representing linguistic peculiarities of Spanish words in the entry. The information zones corresponding to β5(х) and β6(х) don’t have their own metalanguage marker and they can be only identified in the entry by their place in the sequence of information zones. For example, β5(х) always goes after etymology. The definition block, in its turn, can be decomposed in β7(х)GRAM (corresponding to partof-speech note and / or grammar category), β7(х)PRAGM (a group of notes denoting pragmatic use of the headword, e.g. domain, geographic area, social dialect etc.) and β7(х)SEM (definitions corresponding to β7(х)GRAM and β7(х)PRAGM). To group the definitions according to each β7(х)GRAM the following metalanguage means are used in DLE 23: black circle “” to identify the group of definitions belonging to the part of speech of the headword; white circle “○” to identify the group of definitions belonging to the grammar category of the headword; vertical parallel bars “||” to separate definitions within the group marked with black or white circle. 4.2
In the structure of dictionary entries, we distinguish the set of register (head) lexical units W = {х}, which serve as the identifiers of the corresponding dictionary entries V(x). The DLE 23 register includes words and morphemes, certain phrases and abbreviations. Representation of morphemes, phrases and abbreviations as headwords is not inherent for most explanatory dictionaries. For convenience, all language units that act as a headword will be called headwords.
In the structure of each dictionary entry V(x) there is a “left part” L(x), which
consists of certain headword parameters, and there is “right part” P(x), in which the
lexicographic representation of the semantics of a headword x is given. In the case of
DLE 23, we distinguish two types of language units: lexical level units and
collocations (which include the headword). Therefore it is natural to present the structure of
the dictionary unit V(x) in the form of a combination of descriptions (dictionary
entries) of structural units of both types:
( ) ≡
( ) ⋃[⋃ ( ) ⋃ ( )
( )]
(
In the case of V = VLex(x), the headword of the dictionary entry with the corresponding parameters (which we shall now name the parameters of the headword) acts as L0. For Vi Fras(x), L0 is the phrase in the register dictionary form plus the parameters of the head unit. The structure of the right part P0 is identical for a lexical unit and phrase. Arrows hereinafter indicate relations of inclusion. The text analysis of the dictionary entries showed that the structures V(x) are almost identical for collocations and headwords.
To build up a formal model of the lexicographic structure of DLE 23, taking into
account its features mentioned above, we relied on the theory of L-systems by
Volodymyr A. Shyrokov [5], according to which any dictionary can be represented as:
{ ( ), ( ( )), , [ ],
[ ( ( ))]}
(
By VW(xi) and VCOL(xi) we designate the sets of descriptions of headword and derived collocations, respectively; VWL(xi) and VWR(xi) correspond to the “left” and “right” parts. Further, the set VCOL(xi) is divided into the two subsets: a) VCOL’(xi) for collocations of “noun + adjective” type; b) VCOL’’(xi) for collocations of other types, e.g. verbal, adverbial, prepositional etc.
The content example of β-structures for VW(cómico) and VCOL’(cómico de la legua) and VCOL’’(ponerse cómico) is shown in Table 2, based on the entry text (Fig. 1). As it was stated above the βj(хi) are possible to be split into smaller objects σ[βj(хi)] generated by the σ-operator. In DLE 23 there are σ[βj(хi)] objects corresponding to: 1. a certain information element of the entry, e.g. only etymology, headword variants, definition block etc. (σ0); 2. linguistic information distribution in the entry, e.g. distribution of lexical meanings by grammatical classes or categories of a headword (σ1); 3. information provided by the dictionary metalanguage, e.g. definition types (σ2), origin, etymon language, number of definitions etc. 4. linguistic information concerning the interaction of different language levels, e.g.
morphology – semantics; (σ3).
The full list of σ[βj(хi)] objects as a result of application of σ-operator to βj(хi) structures, is given in Table 3. To conduct linguistic researches on the basis of DLE 23 the interface of the virtual lexicographic laboratory allows: the access to the subsystems VLEX(x), VCOL’(xi) and VCOL’’ of the Spanish language dictionary (vocabulary and collocations); selection of σ[βj(хi)] structures within the subsystems to get linguistic facts of any kind (for example: etymology and semantics of a Spanish word); logical operations on σ[βj(хi)] structures to reveal a group of Spanish language units with common linguistic peculiarities.
Applying logical operations “AND”, “OR” and “NOT” to different σ[βj(хi)] objects through the interface, it is possible to make a sample of Spanish language units having common linguistic characteristics. For example, hereinafter we form a sample of words the suffix of which denotes the process and result. In this case the set of σ[βj(хi)] is as follows: σ0[β1(хi)] = «aje» AND σ2[β1(хi)] = «m.» AND σ3[β1(хi), β7(хi)] = «Acción y efecto de + X». As a result, we’ll get the words with suffixes: -ado (lavado, peinado), -aje (etiquetaje, embalaje), -ión (cubrición, gestión).
The linguistic tools for conducting researches of the Spanish language are grouped in respective tabs devoted to each DLE 23 information element, for example “Headword”, “Headword variants”, “Etymology” etc. Each tab corresponds to specific σ[βj(хi)]-structure and contains checkboxes to set σ-links (“Origin”, “Homonymy”, “Headword type” etc.).
In our opinion, the above mentioned features of the interface distinguish the virtual lexicographic laboratory from other electronic (online) lexicographic resources (www.dle.rae.es, www.oed.com, dictionary.cambridge.org etc.). 5
One of the main tasks of modern computer lexicography is updating and supporting fundamental lexicons – large paper explanatory dictionaries – in digital environment. Computer lexicography successfully solves this task by combining many years of traditional lexicography experience with the latest computer technologies. Virtual lexicographic laboratories (VLLs) are the result of such combination, i.e. systems that enable both the operation of dictionary material and the conducting series of linguistic studies.
The virtual lexicographic laboratory provides the users with linguistic tools with a wide range of opportunities for the study of grammatical, semantic, pragmatic, and other features of the Spanish linguistic units. Unlike digital dictionaries and dictionary writing systems the VLL offers a software interface for implementation of: access administration functions: users authorization and identification; new users adding and removing; access control (read only, reading and editing of the dictionary); lexicographic works: creation of a number of derivative dictionaries on the basis of explanatory dictionary; representation of dictionary entries in any format; research work: research at a certain language level, presented in the explanatory dictionary (grammar, including derivation; lexis, including semantics; pragmatics); research at the junction of language levels: grammar and semantics, word forming and semantics, semantics and pragmatics etc.
Unabridged monolingual dictionaries, among them DLE 23, in digital format are found to be powerful research environment facilitating the navigation and access to their structural elements and integration of language facts in one object. This can be achieved by formalizing the structure of dictionary text in a form of β-structures and σ-links.
In prospect, it is planned to develop the theory of lexicographic systems by Prof. Volodymyr Shyrokov for creating the virtual lexicographic laboratory for the dictionary of Spanish language inflection. To elaborate this laboratory it is necessary to work out the principles of word flection formal modeling, especially for the Spanish language. 6