<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>IWSG</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>The Science Gateways Community Institute: Going Beyond Borders</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Sandra Gesing</string-name>
          <email>sandra.gesing@nd.edu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Nancy Wilkins-Diehr</string-name>
          <email>wilkinsn@sdsc.edu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Maytal Dahan</string-name>
          <email>maytal@tacc.utexas.edu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Michael Zentner</string-name>
          <email>mzentner@purdue.edu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Katherine Lawrence</string-name>
          <email>kathla@umich.edu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Purdue University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>West Lafayette</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>The University of Texas at</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Austin</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>University of California, San Diego</institution>
          ,
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>University of Michigan</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Ann Arbor</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4">
          <label>4</label>
          <institution>University of Notre Dame</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Notre Dame</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2017</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>19</volume>
      <fpage>19</fpage>
      <lpage>21</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>-The Science Gateways Community Institute (SGCI), opened in August 2016, provides free resources, services, experts, and ideas for creating and sustaining science gateways. It offers five areas of services to the science gateway developer and user communities: the Incubator, Extended Developer Support, the Scientific Software Collaborative, Community Engagement and Exchange, and Workforce Development. While all these services are available to US-based communities, the Incubator, the Scientific Software Collaborative and the Community Engagement and Exchange serve also the international communities. We aim at reaching out and supporting beyond borders on international scale with diverse measures and our intent is to form and deepen collaborations with partner organizations and coalitions beneficial and/or related to the science gateways community. Research topics are independent of national borders and researchers spread worldwide can benefit from each other's research results, software, data and from lessons learned - via online materials and publications or at international events. The gateway community has long benefitted from this type of exchange. This paper will present related work describing the benefits of international collaborations generally, and specifically as they relate to science gateways. We go into detail regarding SGCI's ongoing work on an international scale and its work planned in the near future.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>science gateways community institute</kwd>
        <kwd>international collaboration</kwd>
        <kwd>community engagement and exchange</kwd>
        <kwd>scientific software collaborative</kwd>
        <kwd>incubator</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>I. INTRODUCTION: THE ORIGINS OF THE SCIENCE GATEWAYS</p>
      <p>COMMUNITY INSTITUTE</p>
      <p>
        The Science Gateways Community Institute (SGCI) was
established as one of the US National Science Foundation’s
first Software Institutes in August 2016 [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. This award was the
result of over 10 years’ work studying the community and its
scientific contributions and the benefits that could be gained
through a central organization providing increased visibility to
these efforts [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. Seven months in, early interest has been
strong. Many are recognizing that work they have done for
many years can be classified as a science gateway. Many more
are recognizing what an increased contribution their work
might make if it were exposed as a science gateway.
      </p>
      <p>
        Early work in the National Science Foundation’s TeraGrid
program [3] involved the creation of policies and a program to
provide access to NSF funded supercomputers for “community
leaders who are building discipline-specific cyberinfrastructure
capabilities”. These capabilities were by and large web-based,
and the science gateway concept was born. These gateways
came from many disciplines and had many different funding
models. Over the eight years of the program we saw a variety
or gateways large and small come and sometimes go,
sometimes despite strong user interest [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">4</xref>
        ]. Frequently failing
gateways could undermine confidence in and potential impact
of these powerful interfaces. Two subsequent studies and a
5000-respondent survey [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">5</xref>
        ] highlight characteristics,
environments and support systems that contributed to successful
science gateways. These studies have directly informed the
design of the Science Gateways Community Institute.
      </p>
      <p>
        SGCI’s current conference series builds on significant work
by others. The Open Grid Computing Environments program,
that advanced the use of web portals, began its workshop series
in 2005 [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">6</xref>
        ]. In 2009, the International Workshop on Science
Gateways (IWSG) series began and in 2015 an Australian
series, IWSG-A [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">7</xref>
        ]. These three series have a history of cross
attendance as well as keynote speakers from the other series.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>II. INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION IN RESEARCH</title>
      <p>
        The benefits of international collaborations are well
supported. The Technopolis group and the Manchester Institute of
Innovation Research analyzed in 2009 the drivers of
international collaboration in research [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">8</xref>
        ]. Their examination is
based on international collaborations in the EU context but also
beyond it including the US, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China,
India, Japan, Mexico, Russia, and South Africa. They found
that the main four drivers of international collaborations are
 Improving national competitiveness
 Supporting less developed countries by developing
science, technology and innovation capabilities


      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Tackling global societal challenges</title>
      <p>Creating good and stable diplomatic relationships (and
indirectly ensuring international security)</p>
      <p>
        While globalization is not a new trend, it becomes more
and more evident in industrial research and the worldwide
mobility of researchers. The success of LIGO [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">9</xref>
        ] and the
detection of gravitational waves is one of the recent
achievements of international collaboration that was attained
by more than 1,000 scientists from 15 different countries. The
2009 report elucidates that the increased political debate and
urgency of global challenges such as climate change, health
issues and sustainable energy resources has led to more
international collaborations. Further findings include that
smaller countries tend to collaborate internationally more often
than bigger ones, and the authors refer to literature reviews that
show that publications with international partners are more
cited than publications with one author or a group of authors
from one country. This trend has many reasons and does not
refer to the quality of publications by single authors but is
evident in citation counts.
      </p>
      <p>For SGCI, international research has—besides the big
picture of such collaborations—also very practical aspects.
Software solutions already developed in countries outside of
the US can be also applied in the US if the source code is
openly accessible and if access technologies and policies for its
usage are aligned. Software frameworks and technologies are
in general not bound to a location; they can be bound to
hardware requirements or require high-speed networks for
efficient and effective use.</p>
      <p>
        Despite all the possibilities and opportunities of
international collaborations, there are also challenges. The
established system sciences conference series HICSS (Hawaii
International Conference on System Sciences) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">10</xref>
        ], for
example, for more than 10 years has had a minitrack analyzing and
discussing the challenges for global virtual teams—not only in
academia but also in industry and governmental projects [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">11</xref>
        ].
They investigate challenges including temporal, cultural, and
language differences; diversity in management and work
styles; and conflict management. Research recommendations
suggest alleviating challenges by increasing the awareness of
these challenges and by training people. While SGCI offers
training and webinars in the context of science gateways with
consideration of these aspects, it will not offer training on the
topic of international collaboration itself.
      </p>
      <p>
        The last decade has led to diverse, mature, science-gateway
frameworks such as HUBzero [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">12</xref>
        ], the Agave Platform [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">13</xref>
        ],
Apache Airavata [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">14</xref>
        ], and Galaxy [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">15</xref>
        ]. Their worldwide usage
is an example for the potential of sharing science gateways
beyond borders (Fig. 1 illustrates the usage of HUBzero-based
science gateways around the globe) and are success stories for
international usage of science gateway technologies.
      </p>
      <p>The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section
3 covers related international organizations and programs.
SGCI is described in section 4 with a particular focus on the
international aspects of each service area. Section 5 goes into
detail about ongoing work between SGCI and its international
counterparts and future work.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>III. RELATED WORK</title>
      <p>
        The UK Software Sustainability Institute (UK SSI) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">16</xref>
        ]
was funded in 2010 and serves the UK’s research software
community as well as partners on an international level. Its
goal is to cultivate better, more sustainable, research software
to enable world-class research. Its investigations have
elucidated that 70% of UK researchers rely on software in their
research [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">17</xref>
        ]. The institute has worked with over 50 projects to
directly improve their codes, written over 80 best practices and
organized training events to teach over 1,000 learners the
basics of software engineering. They have built a platform to
provide researchers and developers access to the contacts,
information and training necessary to develop reliable and
reproducible research software. Besides UK-based and online
activities, the UK SSI organizes a yearly Research Software
Engineers Conference open for international participation and
is majorly involved in the organization of further events such
as the workshop series Working towards Sustainable Software
for Science: Practice and Experience (WSSSPE) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">18</xref>
        ]. Similar
to the goals for international collaborations of SGCI, they have
established partnerships in Canada, the US, and European
countries. They achieved to be the de facto point of contact for
research software good practice. Science gateways form a
subgroup of research software and SGCI aims at building a
longterm partnership with the UK SSI. The institutes can
complement each other with services in the international
research software and science gateways landscape.
      </p>
      <p>
        Science gateways are often called Virtual Research
Environments (VREs) in Europe and the Horizon 2020
program regularly announces solicitations calling for projects
in the context of VREs in general or dedicated to a certain
research domain. For example, VRE4EIC (A Europe-wide
interoperable Virtual Research Environment to Empower
multidisciplinary research communities and accelerate
Innovation and Collaboration) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">19</xref>
        ] targets key data and
software challenges in supporting multidisciplinary data-driven
sciences. Its specific objectives include among others:
 Increase the VRE usability for multi-disciplinary
research;
 Increase the deployment of VRE on different research
infrastructures by abstracting and reusing building
blocks and workflows;
 Improve the contextual awareness and interoperability
of metadata.
These objectives are well aligned with objectives of SGCI
that are concerned with supporting the development of
userfriendly science gateways and reusing existing mature science
gateway frameworks. A goal is to partner with the project on
suitable best practices.
      </p>
      <p>
        ENVRIplus [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">20</xref>
        ] is a Horizon 2020 project “bringing
together Environmental and Earth System Research
Infrastructures, projects and networks together with technical
specialist partners to create a more coherent, interdisciplinary
and interoperable cluster of Environmental Research
Infrastructures across Europe”. The project published a report with a
vision for a worldwide environmental research infrastructure.
The recommendations include topics independent of the
research domain such as improving interdisciplinary
collaboration, sharing computationally expensive results,
dataintensive federation support and software sustainability, which
overlap with goals of science gateways The project organizes
and teams up on events for best practices to create
environmental research infrastructures and is also a very suitable
potential partner for SGCI to share experiences and best
practices on software solutions for interdisciplinary research.
      </p>
      <p>
        Science gateways are an increasingly common component
of funded activities by many agencies in the US. The National
Science Foundation (NSF) and National Institutes of Health
(NIH) directly mention science gateways in solicitations and
roadmaps, [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">21</xref>
        ]; moreover, NIH and Intelligence Advanced
Research Projects Activity (IARPA) also allow for applications
requesting funding for international partners. SGCI can offer
all services of the institute to such international collaborations
when there is support from a US-based partner.
      </p>
      <p>IV. SGCI’S CONCEPT FOR INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATIONS</p>
      <p>SGCI consists of five service areas, which closely interact
and complement each other to serve the communities tailored
to their needs and increase the sustainability and reusability of
science gateways.</p>
      <p>



</p>
      <p>The Community Engagement and Exchange (CEE)
brings the community together through interaction and
professional development.</p>
      <p>The Scientific Software Collaborative (SSC) leverages
and promotes existing investments in gateway
technologies.</p>
      <p>The Incubator team provides expertise and guidance for
the science gateway lifecycle.</p>
      <p>The Extended Developer Support (EDS) enhances
gateways through technical help from experienced
gateway developers.</p>
      <p>The Workforce Development nurtures the next
generation of science gateways users and developers.</p>
      <p>CEE, SSC and the Incubator present near term targets for
engaging and supporting international collaborations on
science gateways via SGCI. These are the areas that can be
offered to the international community, while the EDS and
Workforce Development are actively supporting various
USbased projects and students and are available for US-based
communities but not on an international level. The restriction
on national scale results inherently from characteristics of the
funding. Thus, we describe here in detail the three areas that
are available to the international community.</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>A. Community Engagement and Exchange</title>
        <p>CEE provides a wide variety of measures to interact with
the SGCI and within the community surrounding science
gateways. The yearly Gateways conference series succeeds the
successful Gateways Computing Environment (GCE)
workshop series and attracted more than 120 participants from
the US, Poland, Italy, Mexico and Australia in 2016. It is a
major event for the community to share experiences, present
their work, identify new issues and shape future directions of
research in the context of science gateways. It takes place in
the US and partners with the European workshop series
International Workshop on Science Gateways (IWSG) and
International Workshop on Science Gateways–Australia
(IWSG-A) on a yearly journal special issue as well as on
invitations of keynote speakers.</p>
        <p>Besides these science-gateway focused events, SGCI staff
also present and publish at international technology-focused or
domain-focused events, which attract communities on different
scale, e.g., at the American Geophysical Union (AGU) Fall
meeting with approximately 24,000 participants in 2016, at the
Hawaiian International Conference on System Sciences
(HICSS) with about 1000 participants yearly, or the 2nd
Personalized Medicine Conference with about 40 participants.</p>
        <p>In addition to face-to-face meetings, SGCI features diverse
online options for interaction with different levels of
involvement. Regular newsletters inform not only about news
regarding the activities and products of the SGCI but about
related events, publications and achievements of science
gateway projects. The monthly webinar provides the
opportunity to present use cases, projects, technologies and/or
concepts. Researchers all over the world are also invited to
write blog posts, offer their project as a case study, and
advertise related events. SGCI continuously works on best
practices for various topics related to science gateways,
especially in the Incubator and Extended Developer Support
service areas. We aim for international contributions that
consider the distinct science gateway landscapes in different
countries and on different continents with regard to the
variation of technologies, policies and funding opportunities.
Additionally, researchers can also request webinars on diverse
topics or meetings led by SGCI staff to be presented at their
home institutions. For example, they can ask for a webinar on
software development sustainability via on-campus groups.</p>
        <p>The partner program has been launched to build long-term
partnerships between organizations, projects and the SGCI to
benefit the community in multiple ways:
</p>
        <p>Leverage the expertise of complementary organizations
to support and advise the gateway community in the
best possible way.



</p>
        <p>Exchange existing services to provide the best array of
services to gateway clients.</p>
        <p>Cross-promote resources and services offered by SGCI
and partners.</p>
        <p>Provide a streamlined process to access resources and
services provided by a partner.</p>
        <p>As appropriate, provide student exchange or internship
opportunities.</p>
        <p>Interested organizations collaboratively develop a Letter of
Commitment that includes background information on the
organization and a description of how the organization’s
services/resources are augmented by involvement with SGCI
as well as how it is anticipated that SGCI will benefit from the
partnership. While this program has started only recently, we
plan to immediately reach out to our international collaborators
of many years to form partnerships.</p>
        <p>With this mixture of the outreach and interaction measures
we aim at reaching out to and growing the existing science
gateways community. Researchers might work with or develop
science gateways without being aware of that their web-based
solution is a science gateway and that there are more solutions
and a vibrant community that could be beneficial for their own
research. One of the reasons is that various terms are used to
label science gateways, such as virtual research environments
in Europe or virtual labs in Australia. While we do not try to
unify the various labels, we strive for increasing the visibility
of research and developments in the context of science
gateways and bring the communities together irrespective of
the preferred expression or their locations.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>B. Scientific Software Collaborative</title>
        <p>The Scientific Software Collaborative (SSC) area of the
Institute has the goal of engaging a variety of gateway
developers—from researchers looking for end-to-end solutions
to developers looking to contribute their software services—by
promoting gateways, software and services available. The SSC
will provide researchers the information they need to build
their gateway using existing software or by leveraging existing
gateways, enabling researchers to focus their efforts on their
domain-specific challenges instead of the technology needed to
get there.</p>
        <p>The SSC will deliver software solutions that facilitate the
following:



</p>
        <p>End-to-end solutions to help developers from various
scientific domains who want an “out-of-the-box” hosted
gateway for their application, even if they have minimal
IT support.</p>
        <p>A “use-what-you-need” approach to help developers
discover available software and services to create their
own customized gateways.</p>
        <p>Software for developers who want to actively extend
open-source gateway software to meet their needs
Discovery of gateways for those looking to find existing
gateways they might want to use or collaborate with.</p>
        <p>One of the initial milestones of the SSC will be to deliver a
community Gateway Catalog. The Gateway Catalog is a
publicly available, easy-to-use listing of available science
gateways. The initial catalog will be seeded with entries the
Institute is familiar with and will continue to grow with
community contribution. The community, including
international gateways, will have the ability to create accounts
and add their gateway to the listing. The Gateway Catalog
includes basic information such as name, description, URL, but
also more in depth metadata such as language used to build the
gateway, frameworks, documentation and more. This catalog is
openly accessible and available for international contributions.
Future iterations of the catalog will also have an API endpoint
for automatically sharing and consuming gateway data. The
catalog team will also look at working with national and
international collaborators to share data in the catalog and
consume data with other similar projects. With the changing
landscape and the ever-growing science gateway environment
researchers aren’t limited to using technologies within their
borders. Many technology products are open-source and
available for use. By leveraging SGCI to offer an inclusive
environment for promoting gateway projects across borders it
opens up opportunities for usage from a diverse set of
participants. An example prototype of the catalog is shown in
Fig. 2. When the catalog is in production we will engage
gateway developers from international arenas such as Europe
and Australia to contribute their gateways to the listing.</p>
        <p>As the SSC area continues to expand, we will also be
promoting gateway software. We intend to list gateway
frameworks as well as gateway components providing
authentication, information services, workflows, etc. This
offers additional opportunities for international collaborators to
share software solutions via SSC. The international community
has an opportunity to collaborate with the SSC area of SGCI in
various forms as stated above, and the SSC is open to other
opportunities to collaborate in other ways that advance the
software infrastructure of developing science gateways. In
addition to being contributors, international opportunities are
available in the form of the affiliates program, which entails a
commitment to support users of their software platforms or
components. By having international affiliates become a part of
the program we can leverage the expertise of complementary
organizations to support and advise the gateway community in
the best possible way. Furthermore we can cross-promote
resources and services to provide the best support to gateway
clients.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-3">
        <title>C. Incubator</title>
        <p>The Incubator is focused on helping people who are at
various stages of their gateway lifecycle—ranging from
planning through operations—to step back from the effort and
view it anew with a different set of eyes that are more focused
on the business of gateways than on the technological or
scientific aspects. We accomplish this through two primary
activities. The first is a week-long in-person cohort training
session called a “gateway bootcamp.” The goals of this session
are to equip participants with that second set of eyes, to
establish interpersonal relationships with others in the cohort
engaged in creating gateways, and to familiarize participants
with the in-depth consultations they might seek from the SGCI.
The second is an in-depth consultation to focus on specific
identified areas where a gateway effort needs help. For
gateways in the planning stage, this may take the form of
helping to create a credible case for the value of the proposed
gateway to its likely stakeholders. For gateways that are
already operational, it may take the form of examining
alternative ways they may measure impact to demonstrate to
funders and other stakeholders the value that they bring to their
community. For gateways in the mid-to-late funding stage, it
may involve helping develop a sustainability strategy.</p>
        <p>While SGCI cannot provide direct to support to specific
gateway projects based outside the US, our sponsor views
international engagement opportunities quite positively and
encourages ways for us to convey information to and learn
from groups involved in gateways regardless of the country of
origin. For example, an international group is joining our first
“gateway bootcamp” as observers. Our goal with this
observation is to work with other gateway support
organizations as a mutual learning opportunity rather than to
help a specific international gateway effort.</p>
        <p>Our expectation therefore is to have a follow-up debrief to
learn about the gateway-development climate in the observer’s
region, how it differs from our own, and how to adapt our
message for international audiences. Given that user bases of
gateways span national boundaries, this knowledge is
important in helping gateways understand the implications of some
of their sustainability strategies. Depending on the feedback in
our first session, we may seek to have interested international
participants participate as lecturers in future sessions.</p>
        <p>The Incubator also can offer paid engagements with
international organizations to offer training cohorts in their
regions and with specific gateway efforts who may benefit
from the advisory services we offer. Additionally, since the
Incubator team includes some core SGCI personnel but also
independent consultants, those consultants are able to offer
their services without restriction from our funding agency.
Finally, there are also granting agencies in the US and abroad
that have specific initiatives to foster international
collaboration. Provided that such efforts have a partially
USbased team, we are able to offer our services to these efforts.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>V. FIRST STEPS AND FUTURE WORK</title>
      <p>
        There has been much interest in advancing the progress of
science gateways (virtual laboratories, virtual research
environments) internationally. The International Coalition of
Science Gateways [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">22</xref>
        ] has been proposed as an organization
that would provide a framework for organizations, forums and
individuals with an interest in international, regional, national,
cross-institutional, domain-specific, and interdisciplinary
initiatives in science gateways to exchange information.
Several initial groups have expressed interest in participating.
These included SGCI (USA), NeCTAR (Australia), NESI
(New Zealand), Sci-GaIA (Africa), Academia Sinica Grid
Computing Center (Taiwan), Software Sustainability Institute
(UK), VRE4E1C (Europe), IWSG (Europe), CANARIE
(Canada), Research Data Canada (Canada), the IEEE Technical
Area on Science Gateways (International). First steps included
drafting a survey paper that would provide an overview of
programs internationally, including
practices as well as lessons learned.
successes
and
best
      </p>
      <p>Almost simultaneously in the Research Data Alliance, the
Virtual Research Environments Interest Group
(https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/vre-ig.html) was proposed
to “bring together those initiatives actively developing VREs,
virtual laboratories and science gateways, along with the
representatives of the common infrastructure services and the
researchers seeking to make use of these technologies”. This
effort is geared toward the definition of reference architectures,
standard components, interfaces and best practices in the
construction of science gateways. At current writing, this
interest group consists of 68 members from all over the world.
Meetings have been held at several RDA conferences and a
case statement was developed for the group to review in
March, 2017. The goal here is to move VRE-IG from an
interest group to a working group. Working groups (WGs)
have 18-month deliverables, milestones and work plans and
their activities are a core focus of RDA. In contrast, interest
groups are long-lived and strategic and are expected to 'spawn'
WGs for specific 18-month tasks producing outputs. They
promote communication and coordination and can produce
surveys, recommendations and reports.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>VI. SUMMARY</title>
      <p>SGCI, still in its infancy, looks forward to engaging with
the important international community. We are building on
over 8 years of collaborative work with international
organizations to organize gateway workshops and special
journal issues to enhance communication among the
community and recognize the contributions of the science
gateway developer community. As we in SGCI build out our
own services, we do it in the context of these ongoing
international engagements and with an eye toward how we can
most valuably share developments in and offerings of our
Institute with the wider community. We hope to engage with
other organizations building their own services with an eye
toward international collaboration as well.</p>
      <p>Via the combination of face-to-face meetings, publications,
online resources, the partnership program, the SSC and the
Incubator service area, the SGCI aims at not only reaching out
to a wide and diverse community but also serving as an
international focal point for science gateways. SGCI closely
collaborates with researchers and creators of science gateways
despite national or continental borders or political bans. We are
aware of the diversity of challenges in international
collaborations and would like to start a discussion to extend the
existing measures and ideas about science gateways on an
international scale. The SGCI has the opportunity to expand
beyond currently existing partnerships, and even though it is
located in the US, many measures such as the webinar series
are independent of its location. As we do this, we would like to
continually engage with that community to solicit feedback on
current directions and adapt for the future.</p>
      <p>This research is supported by NSF Award Id ACI-1547611.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>ACKNOWLEDGMENTS</title>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>[1] http://sciencegateways.org/</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gesing</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wilkins-Diehr</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dahan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lawrence</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zentner</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pierce</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hayden</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Marru</surname>
          </string-name>
          , S. “
          <article-title>Science Gateways: The Long Road to the Birth of an Institute”</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proc. of HICSS-50 (50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences)</source>
          ,
          <fpage>4</fpage>
          -7
          <source>January</source>
          <year>2017</year>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Hilton</given-names>
            <surname>Waikoloa</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>HI</surname>
          </string-name>
          , USA,
          <year>2017</year>
          . http://hdl.handle.net/10125/41919 Wilkins-Diehr,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Gannon</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Klimeck</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Oster</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Pamidighantam</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>S</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>"TeraGrid Science Gateways and Their Impact on Science"</article-title>
          , IEEE Computer, volume
          <volume>41</volume>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>number</surname>
            <given-names>11</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>November 2008</year>
          .. https://doi.org/10.1109/
          <string-name>
            <surname>MC</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2008</year>
          .
          <volume>470</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lawrence</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wilkins-Diehr</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2012</year>
          .
          <article-title>"Roadmaps, Not Blueprints: Paving the Way to Science Gateway Success."</article-title>
          <source>XSEDE12 Conference, July 16-20</source>
          ,
          <year>2012</year>
          . ACM Digital Library, DOI= http://doi.acm.
          <source>org/10</source>
          .1145/2335755.2335837.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lawrence</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zentner</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wilkins-Diehr</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wernert</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pierce</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Marru</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Michael</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
          <article-title>Science gateways today and tomorrow: positive perspectives of nearly 5000 members of the research community</article-title>
          .
          <source>Concurrency Computat.: Pract</source>
          . Exper.,
          <volume>27</volume>
          :
          <fpage>4252</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>4268</lpage>
          . http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpe.3526.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>[6] http://www.collab-ogce.org/ogce</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>[7] http://iwsg.info/</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Patries</given-names>
            <surname>Boekholt</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Jakob Edler, Paul Cunningham,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Kieron</given-names>
            <surname>Flanagan</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>"Drivers of International collaboration in research"</article-title>
          .
          <source>Final Report</source>
          .
          <year>2009</year>
          . http://www.eurosfaire.prd.fr/7pc/doc/1266832886_drivers_of_internatio nal_cooperation_in_research.pdf
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B. P.</given-names>
            <surname>Abbott</surname>
          </string-name>
          et al.
          <article-title>(LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger”</article-title>
          .
          <source>Phys. Rev. Lett</source>
          .
          <volume>116</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>061102</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>Published</lpage>
          11 February 2016
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>[10] http://hicss.org/</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>[11] http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/42288</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <surname>M. McLennan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kennell</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>"HUBzero: A Platform for Dissemination and Collaboration in Computational Science and Engineering,"</article-title>
          <source>Computing in Science and Engineering</source>
          ,
          <volume>12</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ), pp.
          <fpage>48</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>52</lpage>
          , March/April,
          <year>2010</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dooley</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Rion et al.
          <article-title>"Software-as-a-service: the iPlant foundation</article-title>
          <source>API." 5th IEEE Workshop on Many-Task Computing on Grids and Supercomputers (MTAGS) Nov</source>
          .
          <year>2012</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Marru</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Suresh, Lahiru Gunathilake, Chathura Herath, Patanachai Tangchaisin, Marlon Pierce, Chris Mattmann, Raminder Singh et al.
          <article-title>"Apache Airavata: a framework for distributed applications and computational workflows."</article-title>
          <source>InProceedings of the 2011 ACM workshop on Gateway computing environments</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>21</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>28</lpage>
          . ACM,
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Goecks</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nekrutenko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Taylor, J and The Galaxy Team. “
          <article-title>Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences”</article-title>
          .
          <source>Genome Biol</source>
          .
          <source>2010 Aug</source>
          <volume>25</volume>
          ;
          <issue>11</issue>
          (
          <issue>8</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>R86</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stephen</surname>
            <given-names>Crouch</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Neil Chue Hong, Simon Hettrick,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mike Jackson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Aleksandra</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pawlik</surname>
            , Shoaib Sufi, Les Carr, David De Roure, Carole Goble, and
            <given-names>Mark</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Parsons</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>The software sustainability institute: Changing research software attitudes and practice</article-title>
          .
          <source>Computing in Science &amp; Engineering</source>
          ,
          <volume>15</volume>
          (
          <issue>6</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>74</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>80</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>[17] https://www.software.ac.uk/</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>[18] http://wssspe.researchcomputing.org.uk/</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>[19] https://www.vre4eic.eu/</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>[20] http://www.envriplus.eu/</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>[21] https://dibbs17.org/report/Presentations/KeynoteQualters.pdf</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>[22] http://www.icsciencegateways..org</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>