=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-2369/keynote01
|storemode=property
|title=None
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2369/keynote01.pdf
|volume=Vol-2369
|dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/amw/Ortiz19
}}
==None==
From Complete to Incomplete Data and Back in
Ontology-Enriched Databases
Magdalena Ortiz
Institute of Information Systems, TU Wien, Austria
Abstract. Enriching a database with a background theory expressing
domain knowledge, usually called an ontology, has been proposed as a
tool to overcome the incompleteness of data. In ontology mediated query-
ing the theory is used to infer answers that may involve implied facts not
present in the data. This and other related reasoning problems have been
extensively studied over the last decade, mostly for ontologies written in
description logics and in dialects of Datalog± . But the usual first-order
semantics used in this setting, which assumes that all data is incomplete,
can sometimes be too weak and not give all expected answers. I will
discuss some alternatives that have been explored for combining com-
plete and incomplete data in the presence of description logic ontologies,
and the challenges that they pose, including increased computational
complexity of reasoning and non-monotonicity of the ontology mediated
query languages they induce. I will discuss a few interesting reasoning
problems that arise in these setting, and some translations from these
query languages into variants of Datalog.