<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Sluimer, I., Prokop, M., van Ginneken, B.: Toward automated segmentation of the
pathological lung in ct. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>ImageCLEF 2019: Pro jection-based CT Image Analysis for TB Severity Scoring and CT Report Generation</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Vitali Liauchuk</string-name>
          <email>vitali.liauchuk@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>United Institute of Informatics Problems</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Minsk</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="BY">Belarus</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2005</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>24</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      <abstract>
        <p>This paper presents an approach for automated analysis of 3D Computed Tomography (CT) images based on representing the 3D CT data as a set of 2D projection images along all three axes. Such approach reduces the dimensionality of the input data and therefore allows using less complicated models for image classi cation tasks. Deep Learning methods were used to predict most of the features of CT images of patients with lung tuberculosis (TB). For part of the features, conventional methods were used. Two di erent methods of segmentation of lungs were employed including the registration-based scheme. The proposed image analysis approach was utilized by United Institute of Informatics Problems (UIIP BioMed) participant for accomplishing the two subtasks of ImageCLEF Tuberculosis task of ImageCLEF 2019 international competition. Employing the proposed approach allowed achieving the best performance in both CT Report Generation and TB Severity Scoring subtasks. Source codes implementing the proposed methods are available on Github1.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Computed Tomography</kwd>
        <kwd>Tuberculosis</kwd>
        <kwd>Deep Learning</kwd>
        <kwd>Projections</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        Automated analysis of 3D CT images is an important step in many tasks
connected with the development of Computer-Aided Diagnosis systems, screening
of lung diseases, early detection of pathology and development of the dedicated
web-portals2 [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ]. However, the task of CT image analysis nowadays remains
challenging due to a number of factors. Partly this is caused by the
complexity of 3D CT image data as well as by the diversity of representations of such
data. A CT image can often be represented as a set of 2D slices with inter-slice
Copyright c 2019 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative
Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). CLEF 2019, 9-12
September 2019, Lugano, Switzerland.
1 https://github.com/skli 13/CompetitionsParticipation
2 http://tbportals.niaid.nih.gov/
distance varying between 0.5 and 5 mm. Variable size and shape of CT image
voxels make it di cult to correctly apply many image analysis algorithms. The
other problem comes from low availability of CT imaging data compared to
some other biomedical image modalities such as X-ray [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8, 14</xref>
        ], histology [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4, 13</xref>
        ]
and microscopy images [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. This strengthens with the complexity and high costs
of manual labeling of 3D CT images. Availability of good quality labeling
signi cantly eases the task of CT image analysis [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6 ref9">6, 9</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>The approach for analysis of 3D CT images proposed with this study employs
the idea of representing each 3D CT scan as a set of 2D projection images
along all three (X, Y and Z) axes: sagittal, frontal and axial projections. The
advantage of such an approach over the conventional slice-wise representation
consists in the fact that each projection obtained via averaging of voxel intensity
values contains information about all the slices present in the image. On the one
hand, such approach signi cantly reduces the complexity of the input data which
eases the task of training the Convolution Neural Networks on a limited amount
of training data. On the other hand, generating projections along di erent axes
(X, Y , Z) provides additional "native" augmentation of the input data.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Subtasks and datasets</title>
      <p>
        The tuberculosis task [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ] of ImageCLEF 2019 Challenge [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ] included two subtasks
all dealing with 3D CT images. Both subtasks shared the same CT imaging data
which included 218 images in the Training (also referred as Development) dataset
and 117 in the Test dataset.
      </p>
      <p>The subtask #1 (SVR subtask) was dedicated to the problem of categorizing
TB cases into one of the two classes: high severity and low severity. In
contrast to the previous year's challenge, the task was only to predict TB Severity
class ("HIGH"/"LOW") rather than to provide a Severity score from 1 to 5.
Also, along with the CT images of TB patients an additional information about
the patients was provided. The metadata included information about presence
of disability, relapse, presence of TB symptoms, co-morbidity, bacillarity, drug
resistance status, patient's education, being ex-prisoner, smoking status and
alcohol addiction. The task was aimed at automatic classi cation of TB Severity
into "HIGH" and "LOW" classes. The frequencies of occurrence of each
metadata label are listed in Table 1.</p>
      <p>The subtask #2 (CTR subtask) was the newly-introduces subtask which was
dedicated to automated generation of CT reports which indicated presence of
several types of abnormalities in lungs. Such automated annotation of CT scans
is important for development of the dedicated image databases. The task was to
predict the presence of six types of ndings in CT scans. Information about the
corresponding labels is listed in Table 2.
The key idea of the approach proposed with this study consists in converting 3D
CT scans into 2D projections followed by analysis of the obtained 2D projection
images with use of Deep Learning and conventional methods.</p>
      <p>
        For generation of the projections, two di erent versions of automatically
extracted lung masks were used: the lung masks provided by the competition
organizers [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] ("default") and the masks obtained via a conventional
segmentationthrough-registration scheme [12]. A short description of implementation of the
registration-based lung segmentation method can be found in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. Source codes
implementing this method are available on Github3. The lung masks obtained
via registration-based approach are in general less accurate compared to the
default ones but they appear useful in the cases of presence of large lesions in
lungs. Fig. 1 illustrates both versions of lung masks on a CT image of a patient
with pleurisy (Patient-ID: "CTR TRN 013"). It can be seen that the default
lung masks tend to leave parts of large lesions outside of the segmentation.
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>3 https://github.com/skli 13/CT RegSegm</title>
        <p>The process of generation of CT projection images considered performing the
following major procedures. The CT image voxel intensity values were increased
by the value of 1024 Houns eld Units (HU) to ensure only positive intensity
values. To exclude the in uence of image segmentation faults on the lung borders,
the lung masks were eroded using ellipsoidal structure elements of radius 10 along
XY plane. The radius along Z-axis was calculated respectively to the inter-slice
distance of the speci c CT image. Image intensity values outside of the eroded
lung masks were zeroed. Optionally, an intensity threshold can be applied to
lter noisy voxels with low intensities.</p>
        <p>Each 2D projection image was represented as a pseudo-RGB image and had
three channels. The rst (red) channel contained mean values of CT image
intensities along the speci ed axis. The mean values were nally divided on their
maximum value along the projection image. The second (green) channel
contained maximum intensity values along the speci ed axis divided by the value
of 1500 which corresponds to 1500 1024 = 476 HU in terms of the original
voxel intensities. The third (blue) channel was composed of the corresponding
Standard Deviation intensity values. As in the case of red channel, blue channel
values were divided by their maximum. Finally, the resultant 2D projection
images were cropped using the bounding boxes of non-zero regions and resized to
256 256 pixels size. Projections were generated for each lung separately. The
general scheme of generation of 2D projections from 3D CT images is shown in
Fig. 2</p>
        <p>Using this scheme, six 2D projection images were generated for each CT scan
in the dataset: sagittal, frontal and axial projections for each of the two lungs.
Three versions of projection images were generated with use of di erent lung
masks and intensity thresholds. Details on the versions are shown in Table 3.
For correct validation of the developed image analysis algorithms, the
Development dataset provided by the organizers was split into training and validation
subsets. With this study, each 4-th CT image from the Development dataset was
labeled as validation image (54 cases), whereas all other CT cases were used for
training the algorithms (164 cases). This training/validation data split was used
at every stage for both subtasks without changes.
3.3</p>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-1">
          <title>Utilized neural network model</title>
          <p>
            Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) were used to predict most of CT
image characteristics. A deeply modi ed version of a popular VGG16 [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
            ] neural
network was used with this study.
          </p>
          <p>Conventional VGG16 architecture includes 13 convolutional layers in ve
blocks and three fully-connected layers (13 + 3 = 16). Considering the limited
amount of the available data, the employed neural network model was simpli ed
by (i) reducing the number of convolutional layers to one per block (5 layers),
(ii) using global maximum pooling after the last convolutional block instead of
attening, and (iii) reducing the number of nodes in the fully-connected layers
to 128. All this signi cantly reduces the number of trained parameters of the
network model which minimizes the e ect of over- tting. The resultant network
model included eight trainable layers: 5 convolutional and 3 fully-connected.
3.4</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-2">
          <title>Prediction of labels for the CTR subtask</title>
          <p>Training CNN for lung-wise detection of abnormalities. Most of the
metadata labels provided with this challenge (TB Severity class, presence of
certain lesions) were assigned at the level of CT scans. On the other hand,
LeftLungA ected and RightLungA ected labels from the CTR subtask metadata can
be used to train image classi cation models to detect presence of abnormalities
at single lung level.</p>
          <p>At this step, a Convolutional Neural Network was trained to classify a 2D
lung projection image as either healthy ("normal") or a ected by TB
("abnormal"). The training and validation data was composed of lung projection images
along X, Y and Z axes, left and right lungs were considered separately. Thus,
the total number of input samples was 164 2 (lungs) 3 (projections) = 984
for training and 54 2 3 = 324 for validation. The size of the network input
was 256 256 3 which corresponded to a projection image of a single lung.
Categorical cross-entropy was used as the cost function. Additional on-the- y
data augmentation was applied which included random rotations with 10 degree
range, width and height shifts and random re-scaling.</p>
          <p>The network training for lung-wise "normal"/"abnormal" classi cation was
performed with use of lung projections v1.0, Adam optimizer and learning rate
set to 10 5 within 120 training epochs. Network weights were initialized
randomly. Here and further the training was performed with use of Keras
framework with Tensor ow backend on a personal computer equipped with a GPU of
Nvidia TITAN X type with 3072 CUDA Cores and 12 GB of GDDR5 on-board
memory.</p>
          <p>The trained CNN was evaluated on the lung projection images generated
from the validation CT scans to produce the con dence scores. Projection-wise
comparison to the ground truth data resulted in 0.865 Area Under ROC-Curve
(AUC). However, 2D projections generated along di erent axes from the same
3D image must have the same label ("normal" or "abnormal"). Therefore, the
con dence scores obtained for the three projections of each lung were combined
to increase the lung-wise classi cation quality. The best performance of lung-wise
"normal"/"abnormal" classi cation was achieved by means of using maximum
among the three con dence values which corresponded to X, Y and Z axes
(AUC = 0.920).</p>
          <p>Detection of caverns and lung capacity decrease. Similar approach was
used for detection of caverns and lung capacity decrease. In this case, the
corresponding labels were speci ed at CT image level, therefore the input data
consisted of projections of both lungs. The corresponding neural network model
had the input of size 256 512 3 which corresponded to two concatenated
projection images. Lung projections v1.1 were used.</p>
          <p>Weights of the convolutional layers were initialized with the corresponding
weights of the CNN previously trained for lung-wise "normal"/"abnormal"
classi cation. The networks for detection of lung capacity decrease and caverns were
trained for 50 and 120 epochs respectively. Evaluation of the trained CNNs on
the validation data resulted in 0.832 AUC for lung capacity decrease and 0.809
AUC for caverns detection at projection level. Averaging the con dence values
obtained for X, Y and Z projections gave the CT-wise detection performance
of 0.856 AUC for lung capacity decrease and 0.879 AUC for caverns.
Detection of calci cation and pleurisy. Scores for prediction of calci cation
were calculated using the mean intensity values of v1.2 projection images. These
values re ect the number of voxels in lung regions of the original CT images
with intensities exceeding 1000 HU threshold. Evaluation of such scores on the
Development dataset resulted in 0.726 AUC value.</p>
          <p>Since the lung masks provided by the organizers tend to exclude pleurisy from
lung segmentation (see Fig.1), the scores for detection of pleurisy were calculated
as di erence between the volume of lung masks obtained via registration-based
scheme and the volume of lung masks provided by the organizers. Evaluation of
such scores gave 0.776 AUC value on the Development dataset.</p>
          <p>Summary on the CTR subtask. The results of evaluation of the prediction
algorithms for the CTR subtask are shown in Table 4. All the AUC values were
assessed on the validation dataset.
The approach used with this study for prediction of TB severity consisted of two
major stages.</p>
          <p>The rst stage considered training a CNN for prediction of severity class
with use of only CT projection images. At this stage, the VGG16 network was
trained to classify TB severity into "HIGH" and "LOW" classes. Similarly to
the detection of caverns and lung capacity decrease in the CTR subtask,
input for the CNN for severity classi cation was composed of projections of both
left and right lungs. Weights of all trainable layers (convolutional and
fullyconnected) of the network were initialized with the corresponding weights of the
CNN previously trained for lung-wise "normal"/"abnormal" classi cation. The
network was trained on v1.0 projection images during 60 epochs. Evaluation of
the trained network on the validation set resulted in 0.768 AUC value.</p>
          <p>At the second stage, the output of a trained CNN (con dence score) was
combined with the available metadata features for prediction of TB severity with
use of Linear Regression classi er. Several more classi ers were tested including
Random Forests, Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine, but Linear
Regression gave the best AUC on the validation subset. Two sets of the metadata
features were used: all available metadata features and the subset of four selected
features which gave the same AUC on the validation subset. The subset of four
features included DrugResistance, HigherEducation, ExPrisoner and Alcoholic
labels.</p>
          <p>AUC values assessed on the validation data using di erent combinations of
metadata features and CNN outputs obtained from di erent projection images
are shown in Table 5. The testing results presented with the table suggest that
2D projection images generated along X axis were the most informative for
prediction of TB Severity class by the neural network. Utilizing projections along
Z axis did not improve the results compared to the prediction using only X and
Y projections.</p>
          <p>Among the combinations which used all available metadata features, the
one which used CNN outputs from X projections showed the best performance
with 0.844 AUC on the validation subset. The overall best performance on the
validation data was achieved using the subset of four metadata features along
with CNN outputs from X and Y projections. These two combinations were
used in the two submitted runs for the SVR subtask.
4</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Submissions and results</title>
      <p>As the result of this study, three runs were submitted by UIIP BioMed for the
CTR subtask and two for the SVR subtask. Full list of the submitted results for
both subtasks is available at the task web page4. Network models and classi ers</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>4 https://www.imageclef.org/2019/medical/tuberculosis/</title>
        <p>used for predicting the Test data were trained on the training subset of
Development data (see subsection 3.2). All the computed prediction scores were scaled
to the range from 0 to 1 to t the submission requirements.</p>
        <p>Subsection 3.4 describes the methods used for the last ("CTR run3 ...")
submission for the CTR subtask. The previous submissions di ered with the ways
of predicting LungCapacityDecrease, Pleurisy and Caverns and demonstrated
poorer performance on the validation data. In "CTR run1 ...", these three
ndings were predicted by a single neural network trained for multi-class multi-label
classi cation (0.844 mean AUC on validation). In "CTR run2 ...",
LungCapacityDecrease and Caverns labels were predicted using separate CNNs trained for
binary classi cation which gave better results (0.852 mean AUC on validation).
Table 6 shows results achieved by the participants in the CTR subtask, one best
run for each participating group. The run submitted by UIIP BioMed achieved
the highest values of both mean and minimum AUC for prediction of presence
of lung abnormalities.</p>
        <p>The methods used for submissions in the SVR subtask are described in
subsection 3.5. The rst submitted run ("SRV run1 ...") used all metadata features
and X projections for TB Severity classi cation and achieved the overall best
performance in both AUC (0.7877) and Accuracy (0.7179). The second
submission "SRV run2 ..." used the subset of four metadata features along with X and
Y projections. This approach demonstrated better performance on the
validation data. However, on the Test data it resulted in lower AUC (0.7636 vs. 0.7877)
but higher Accuracy (0.7350 vs. 0.7179). Results of the participants' submissions
with the highest AUC values are shown in Table 7.
5</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>The results of this study allow to draw the following conclusions:
{ 2D projections of lungs generated from 3D CT scans preserve basic
information about the lungs structure which is su cient for detection of
abnormalities of di erent sort.
{ TB Severity can be assessed based on the analysis of CT scans, however
additional information on clinical data, drug resistance and patient's social
status are helpful for more accurate scoring of TB Severity.
{ Usefulness of di erent methods of lungs segmentation may vary depending of
the speci c task being solved. Combining multiple lung segmentation
methods may provide additional information which can be useful for detection of
certain abnormalities in lungs.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>This study was partly supported by the National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, USA through the CRDF project DAA3-18-64818-1 "Year 7:
Belarus TB Database and TB Portals".</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Al-Kofahi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zaltsman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Graves</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Marshall</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rusu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>A deep learningbased algorithm for 2-D cell segmentation in microscopy images</article-title>
          .
          <source>BMC Bioinformatics</source>
          <volume>19</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <volume>365</volume>
          (Oct
          <year>2018</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2375-z, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2375-z
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Dicente</given-names>
            <surname>Cid</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Liauchuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Klimuk</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Tarasau</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Kovalev</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>V.</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Muller, H.:
          <article-title>Overview of ImageCLEFtuberculosis 2019 - automatic ct-based report generation and tuberculosis severity assessment</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: CLEF2019 Working Notes. CEUR Workshop Proceedings</source>
          , CEUR-WS.org &lt;http://ceur-ws.
          <source>org&gt;</source>
          , Lugano,
          <source>Switzerland (September 9-12</source>
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Dicente</given-names>
            <surname>Cid</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Jimenez del Toro</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.A.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Depeursinge</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>A.</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Muller, H.:
          <article-title>E cient and fully automatic segmentation of the lungs in ct volumes</article-title>
          . In: Goksel,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Jimenez del Toro</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.A.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Foncubierta-Rodr guez</surname>
          </string-name>
          , A., Muller, H. (eds.)
          <article-title>Proceedings of the VISCERAL Anatomy Grand Challenge at the 2015 IEEE ISBI</article-title>
          . pp.
          <volume>31</volume>
          {
          <fpage>35</fpage>
          . CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS (May
          <year>2015</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Ehteshami</given-names>
            <surname>Bejnordi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Veta</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            , Johannes van Diest, P.,
            <surname>van Ginneken</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Karssemeijer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Litjens</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G., van der Laak,
          <string-name>
            <surname>J.A.W.M.</surname>
          </string-name>
          , ,
          <article-title>the CAMELYON16 Consortium: Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer</article-title>
          .
          <source>JAMA</source>
          <volume>318</volume>
          (
          <issue>22</issue>
          ),
          <volume>2199</volume>
          {
          <volume>2210</volume>
          (12
          <year>2017</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <volume>14585</volume>
          , https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.
          <year>2017</year>
          .14585
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ionescu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Muller, H.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Peteri</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cid</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Liauchuk</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kovalev</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Klimuk</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tarasau</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Abacha</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hasan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Datla</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Demner-Fushman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dang-Nguyen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Piras</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Riegler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tran</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lux</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gurrin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pelka</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Friedrich</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>de Herrera</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.G.S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Garcia</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kavallieratou</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>del Blanco</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Rodr guez, C.C.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vasillopoulos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Karampidis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chamberlain</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Clark</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Campello</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>ImageCLEF 2019: Multimedia retrieval in medicine, lifelogging, security and nature</article-title>
          . In:
          <article-title>Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the CLEF Association (CLEF</source>
          <year>2019</year>
          ), vol.
          <volume>2380</volume>
          .
          <source>LNCS Lecture Notes in Computer Science</source>
          , Springer, Lugano,
          <source>Switzerland (September 9-12</source>
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kalinovsky</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Liauchuk</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tarasau</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Lesion detection in CT images using Deep Learning semantic segmentation technique</article-title>
          . In: International Workshop "Photogrammetric and
          <article-title>computer vision techniques for video surveillance, biometrics and biomedicine"</article-title>
          .
          <source>The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XLII</source>
          , pp.
          <volume>13</volume>
          {
          <fpage>17</fpage>
          . Moscow, Russia (May
          <year>2017</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2
          <string-name>
            <surname>-W4-</surname>
          </string-name>
          13-2017, http://www.int
          <article-title>-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci</article-title>
          .net/XLII2-W4/13/2017/
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Liauchuk</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kovalev</surname>
          </string-name>
          , V.:
          <article-title>ImageCLEF 2017: Supervoxels and co-occurrence for tuberculosis CT image classi cation</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: CLEF2017 Working Notes. CEUR Workshop Proceedings</source>
          , CEUR-WS.org &lt;http://ceur-ws.
          <source>org&gt;</source>
          , Dublin,
          <source>Ireland (September</source>
          <volume>11</volume>
          -14
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Liauchuk</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kovalev</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Detection of lung pathologies using deep convolutional networks trained on large X-ray chest screening database</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Pattern Recognition and Information Processing</source>
          (PRIP'
          <year>2019</year>
          ). Minsk, Belarus (May 21-23
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Liauchuk</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tarasau</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Snezhko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kovalev</surname>
          </string-name>
          , V.:
          <article-title>ImageCLEF 2018: Lesionbased TB-descriptor for CT image analysis</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: CLEF2018 Working Notes. CEUR Workshop Proceedings</source>
          , CEUR-WS.org &lt;http://ceur-ws.
          <source>org&gt;</source>
          , Avignon,
          <source>France (September 10-14</source>
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rosenthal</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gabrielian</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Engle</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hurt</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alexandru</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Crudu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sergueev</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kirichenko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lapitskii</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Snezhko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kovalev</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Astrovko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Skrahina</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Taa</surname>
            <given-names>e</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , J.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Harris</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Long</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wollenberg</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Akhundova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ismayilova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Skrahin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mammadbayov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gadirova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Abuzarov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Seyfaddinova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Avaliani</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Strambu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zaharia</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Muntean</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ghita</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bogdan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mindru</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Spinu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sora</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ene</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vashakidze</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shubladze</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nanava</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>U.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tuzikov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tartakovsky</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>The TB Portals: an open-access, web-based platform for global drug-resistant-tuberculosis data sharing and analysis</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of clinical microbiology</source>
          <volume>55</volume>
          (
          <issue>11</issue>
          ),
          <volume>3267</volume>
          {
          <fpage>3282</fpage>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Simonyan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zisserman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition (</article-title>
          <year>2014</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>