<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>The Main Aspects of the Introduction of ERP-Systems at the Machine-Building Enterprises</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Irina Nyzhnyk</string-name>
          <email>nyzhnyk@khnu.km.ua</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Viktor Lysak</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Khmelnytskyi National University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>11, Instytutska st., Khmelnytskyi, 29000</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Research goals and objectives: to carry out the analysis of the market of ERP-systems and to make scientific and practical recommendations for their choice for successful introduction at domestic machine-building enterprises. Subject of research: design, implementation and use of ERP-systems at the machine-building enterprises of Ukraine. Research methods: statistical, systematic and comparative analysis, modular design, analytical and expert methods. Results of the research: The advantages of implementing ERP-systems at the machine-building enterprises have been evaluated, the most significant impact on individual indicators of enterprises has been determined and the advantages and disadvantages of automation of business processes at machine-building enterprises, depending on their separate types, are described. Examples of integration of subsystems on the basis of information flows and interaction of automated systems with external entities are given. It is proved that the success of the implementation of ERP-systems depends on the correct choice of the system class, the type of production, set priorities for the automation of business functions, taking into account the factors of criticality, readiness, speed and value. As a result, the maximum effect from the implementation of the ERP system potentially depends on: the completeness of its compliance with national legislation, the user interface's convenience and clarity, the ability to adapt to the industry-specific features and the specifics of the operation of a particular enterprise, the possibilities of integration into the system of external and internal modules, etc. It is important to involve the consulting companies, industry specialists and employees of the enterprise in the process of implementation.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)</kwd>
        <kwd>Enterprise Resource &amp; Relationship Processing (ERP II)</kwd>
        <kwd>criteria for selecting</kwd>
        <kwd>designing and implementation</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        Currently, the Ukrainian market has a large selection of high-class systems for
automation of enterprises’ functioning. The worldwide leaders in this field, represented in
Ukraine, are products of SAP, Baan, Oracle and Microsoft companies. They are
correctly localized and implemented, or are successfully implemented at the Ukrainian
enterprises. The products of such Ukrainian companies as "Information
Technologies", Sirius System, IFS Ukraine and others are also common [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12 ref19 ref8 ref9">8, 9, 12, 19</xref>
        ]. And
here, the main thing is not the creation of a large number of interesting information
systems from the point of view of their developer. Design of ERP-systems should be
aimed at the consumer, to offer managers and marketers more opportunities for
understanding the views of consumers, to respond to their needs.
      </p>
      <p>The current global trend towards building integrated enterprise management
automation systems is the creation of the Enterprise Application Suite (EAS). This
approach allows the most efficient use of the capabilities of accounting systems
(ERPsystems, systems of financial and economic management, accounting programs) and
OLAP-systems (planning and budgeting, knowledge management systems, data
warehouses) and others.</p>
      <p>
        However, most Ukrainian enterprises have different automated enterprise
management systems that have been introduced long ago, they are inefficient and do not
fully meet modern business management concepts and therefore can be classified by
software capabilities. Among these systems are the following [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12 ref19 ref9">9, 12, 19</xref>
        ]: Material
Requirements Planning System (MRP), Manufacturing Resource Planning System
(MRP II), Manufacturing Execution System (MES), Customer Demand Planning
System (CDP), Customer Relationship Management System (CRM).
      </p>
      <p>
        Current demands for the operation of such systems require the use of advanced
tools, a strong technological base, mobility, accessibility, reasonable price for the
acquisition and service, taking into account relevant national standards [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11 ref15">11, 15</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>The aim of the article is to describe scientific and methodological foundations and
practical recommendations on key selection criteria for the modern ERP-systems of a
machine-building enterprise.
2</p>
      <p>
        The Main Requirements for Modern ERP Systems
The analysis shows that for the Ukrainian enterprises the most relevant concepts of
enterprise management systems are MRPII and ERP, which actually became world
standards. They represent a set of general rules set out in 1980-1990 years [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. Taking
into consideration the fact, that ERP-systems are focused on fulfilling more tasks than
MRPII, which focuses on managing production resources, in the article we focus on
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>ERP, in particular, their modern version - ERPII.</title>
      <p>It is difficult to calculate exactly what the ERP-system gives to the company,
taking into account the diversity of systems, different conditions of enterprises before
introduction, and the complexity and uniqueness of each project. An expert survey of
specialists of machine-building enterprises of Khmelnytskyi region was conducted by
us at the beginning of 2019. We asked about the effectiveness of the ERP-systems,
introduced by them and the results of the survey showed positive results (Table 1).</p>
      <p>Since the authors did not aim at assessing the effectiveness of embedded IT
technology ERP-systems, then the calculation of the values of changes in table indicators
did not apply common methods such as Return on Investment (ROI), Total Cost
Ownership (TCO), Cost-Benefits Analysis (СВА) etc. Instead, the comparison of the
values of the indicators of economic characteristics before the implementation of the
ERP-system and after the startup of the system at the enterprises was made. The
assessment of qualitative and quantitative indicators was carried out on the basis of the
points put forward in the questionnaires by experts of the enterprises, and also on the
basis of statistical data of their financial reports.</p>
      <p>As a result, as shown in table 1, the introduction of ERP systems in
machinebuilding enterprises has had the most positive effect on the deadlines for closing the
accounting period, the general culture of management, the use of optimal business
process schemes, delivery in the exact terms, transport and procurement costs,
aftersales service. For such a conclusion we have taken only those indicators, the growth
rate of which exceeds 60%.</p>
      <p>
        According to the statistical portal Statista, the entire world market of large and
medium ERP was income from the sale of software $ 82.1 billion in 2015 and the results
of 2016 rose to $ 82.3 billion [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]. The main problem when choosing the ERP modules
and its implementation is the task of creating a unified system that meets the needs of
employees at all departments [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12 ref13">12, 13</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Modern enterprise management system that meets the ERP concept should have
the following modules: Supply Chain Management (SCM), Advanced Planning and
Scheduling (APS), Sales Force Automation (SFA), Stand Alone Configuration Engine
1</p>
      <p>
        Created by the authors based on the results of the expert survey of 28 machine-building
enterprises of Khmelnytskyi region.
(SCE), Finite Resource Planning (FRP), Business Intelligence (BI), Online Analytic
Processing (OLAP), E-Commerce (EC), Product Data Management (PDM) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12 ref6">6, 12</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Recently, one can observe the trend of intensive management technologies
development aimed at improving the interaction with external entities: customers,
suppliers, partners and others. These information systems are based on the management of a
full cycle of production: from designing according to customer requirements to
guarantee and service. These technologies in modern terms are: Customer Synchronized
Resource Planning (CSRP), Supply Chain Management (SCM), Customer
Relationship Management (CRM).
3</p>
      <p>ERP Selection Based on the Type of Production and Scale of
Automation
In order to consider all the needs of a machine-building enterprise, the choice of ERP
must begin with the analysis of production and, depending on its characteristics, focus
on different management concepts and automated information systems. In the
evaluation of existing trends in production planning, it can be noted that the individual
production is the most difficult, which requires constant technological change,
recruitment and changes in work processes and therefore, the use of ERP in this case is
inappropriate. Here it is better to apply PERT (Program/Project Evaluation and Review
Technique) methods and network planning methods, especially for analyzing the time
for each individual task and minimizing the time spent on the whole project (Fig. 1).
∞
e
g
n
a
r
t
c
u
d
o
r
P
0</p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Complexity of production 1</title>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-1">
          <title>Individual production</title>
          <p>PERT methods
and network
planning methods
2</p>
          <p>Small-scale
production
3</p>
          <p>Serial
production
ERP methods
4</p>
          <p>Large-scale
production
JIT methods
5</p>
          <p>Mass
production</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>Volume of production</title>
        <p>∞
0</p>
        <p>P
R
E
f
o
r
e
w
o
p
l
a
n
o
it
c
n
u
F</p>
        <p>The three following types are different versions of serial production, in which,
when the seriality increases, the versatility of the equipment decreases and the
spe</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>2 Suggested by the authors</title>
      <p>cialization of workers shrinks, consequently, the number of types of finished products
decreases, and the volume of output increases. The fifth type is characterized by mass
production, the availability of specialized equipment, conveyors, technological
complexes, the minimum number of types of products with maximum output volumes.</p>
      <p>Research has shown that the use of modern flexible and powerful algorithms for
the distribution of production processes has led to the development of Advanced
Planning and Scheduling (APS). Therefore, the enterprises of the second, third and
fourth types of production need to apply the concept of ERP, and for the fifth type
JIT-methods (Just-In-Time), because ERP-techniques for such production are too
powerful. The scale of automation introduction at the machine-building enterprises of
Khmelnitsky region can be divided into partial automation, by individual areas, by the
chosen sphere of activity and full automation (Table 2).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Automation of Advantages: individual subsystems are much cheaper than a</title>
      <p>certain local complete solution.</p>
      <p>business pro- Disadvantages: lack of strategy; task locality; probability of
Partial cesses getting pieces of unfinished infrastructure; additional costs due
to functions duplication and servicing of unfinished modules;
inefficiency of investment.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Automation of Advantages: automation systems in certain areas provide signifi</title>
      <p>individual cant economic benefit; saving investment resources.</p>
      <p>By individu- aprreoadsuoctrioadnmin- type of manufacturing and its standards; frequent viewing of</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Disadvantages: automation is carried out strictly under a certain</title>
      <p>al areas
istrative units strategic and operational plans of automation
on functional
grounds.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Automation of Advantages: implementing ERP &amp; MRP II before full automa</title>
      <p>the chosen tion; all subdivisions of the chosen sphere of activity are
insphere of activ- volved; emerging information and communication structure of
By sphere of ity. the company; a re-engineering of business processes and
creatactivity areas ing a business model.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>Disadvantages: requires frequent review of strategic and operational plans of automation; requires significant investments in hardware, software, hiring developers.</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>Creation of an Advantages: full integration of all modules and control units,</title>
      <p>integrated procedures, functions and operations to a single system based on
enterprise database; integration of the mathematical software on the basis</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>Full management of models and methods for providing planning and forecasting. system. Disadvantages: the need for adjustment of the strategic plan to reflect changes in the market; additional costs for service support and maintenance of hardware, software, hiring developers.</title>
      <p>We have proved that in today's competitive processes ERP application helps
optimize operations, reduces errors, improves forecasting and planning, and aims to
significantly reduce costs and improve production processes. However, analyzing the
advantages and disadvantages of automating business processes at an enterprise, it</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-11">
      <title>Systematized according to the advantages and disadvantages based on our own research</title>
      <p>must be emphasized that everything depends on the needs and financial capabilities of
each particular enterprise.
4</p>
      <p>
        ERP-Systems Selection Based on Their Capabilities
Since the beginning of the 21st century, new functional capabilities of the ERP
system have begun to evolve in the world, which went beyond the traditional features of
automation and optimization of business processes of the ERP methodology. The
traditional concept of ERP envisaged primarily work with internal enterprise
resources, resource planning, careful inventory management and insurance of
transparency of manufacturing processes. The functional of modern systems has been
supplemented by modules such as SCM and CRM, responsible for optimizing external
communications of the enterprise. There was a separation of concepts: the traditional
ERP management was called back-office, and external applications that appear in the
system - front-office. Thus, a new standard has appeared - ERP II (Enterprise
Resource and Relationship Processing) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Our analysis confirms that new ERP really provides comprehensive management
of key business processes, often in real time. Typically, these systems are represented
by a set of integrated applications that the enterprise can use to collect, store, manage
and view data about many types of their own activities. These systems monitor
business resources (cash, raw materials, manufacturing facilities and the status of business
liabilities (demand for products and materials) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        The analysis showed that the new ERP was complemented by the following
modules [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref13 ref19 ref6">1, 6, 13, 19</xref>
        ]:
─ Supplier Relationship Management (SRM), which is designed to improve
management, optimize purchasing power, improve customer service by selecting and
properly working with suppliers, establishing and improving business processes
with further analysis of results.
─ Product Lifecycle Management (PLM), which helps in planning and optimizing
production capacity and material resources.
─ Supply Chain Management (SCM), which allows controlling processes in the
warehouse and quickly respond to changes in supply and demand.
─ Customer Relationship Management (CRM), which is used to manage
relationships with consumers, including the collection, storage and analysis of information
about customers, suppliers, partners, and information about relationships with
them.
─ Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), which can effectively manage all lifecycle,
improve resource utilization and reduce costs by using powerful analytics tools.
─ Business Intelligence (BI) &amp; Online Analytical Processing (OLAP), which allows
converting streaming business information into human-readable form.
─ E-Commerce System, which manages activity of all electronic financial and
trading transactions, as well as related business processes.
      </p>
      <p>In general, there are three main areas that determine the development of the class
ERPII: deepening the functionality of ERP; the emergence of technologies that
simplify the creation of specialized industry solutions; creation of new and improvement
of existing management modules between corporate business processes.</p>
      <p>Our system analysis revealed that the main differences between ERP and ERPІI
arose from the rapid development of e-commerce and increased interaction between
all subjects of financial and business processes via the Internet, so the modern system
received a Web-based architecture (Fig. 2).</p>
      <p>g
n
i
teh trae
tso spo
e t
c n
r a
tp iltrrfeaeounn itlltraapo ifssseonbu</p>
      <p>s icp .s
e o en t</p>
      <p>s
ccon tiaon tisapo tireen
eNw iitzm th no
op tem mm</p>
      <p>s o
om sy ec
r e th
f s
s i
u rp in
c r
fo t</p>
      <p>e
itignh reen
f ta
S rpo
o
c</p>
      <p>Changing role of ERP
Automation of internal and external business processes, free
interaction with partners - customers, suppliers, banks and others.</p>
      <sec id="sec-11-1">
        <title>Structural change of system architecture</title>
        <p>To replace the closed monolithic platform came open, multi-level
applications, built on the principle of component model.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-11-2">
        <title>Changing technology system towards openness and transparency</title>
        <p>Internal processes become open. Business activity data may be
available to all members of the business community.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-11-3">
        <title>Increased system functionality</title>
        <p>All business processes of the enterprise are subject to automation.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-11-4">
        <title>Extending the scale of implementation</title>
        <p>Adaptation of any type of the enterprise system and scale.</p>
        <p>
          In our opinion and in the opinion of many scientists enterprise resource
management requires a comprehensive review of all business processes within a single
information system [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11 ref19 ref4 ref6 ref9">4, 6, 9, 11, 19</xref>
          ]. The absence of functions important to the
enterprise in the system and the impossibility of their additions for a certain period of time
- indicate the inexpediency of its implementation at this enterprise. And because of
this, in the face of increased competition, it is necessary to find out the real needs of
the enterprise from the function of modern ERP and to develop and describe the
sequence of such a system, to determine the need for individual blocks of automation of
business processes.
        </p>
        <p>We have proved that an important aspect of implementing the chosen ERP is the
level of integration between its subsystems. As an example, consider a scheme of
integration of subsystems based on information flows (Fig. 3).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-12">
      <title>4 Systematized by the authors based on [1, 5, 13]</title>
      <p>Product
warehouse
product
composition</p>
      <p>planned
nomenclature
purchase order
required time,
release
required
time</p>
      <p>Schedule
e
l
b
a
t
e
m
ti
Requirements
planning
customer orders
list of configurations
available for order</p>
      <p>fulfillment
order status
special order
sales order
stock status
confirmation
productive
reserves
required
time
arrival</p>
      <p>Order book</p>
      <p>Customers
payments
s
u
t
a
t
s
r
e
d
r
o
e
s
a
e
l
e
r
Inventory
management
l
a
v
i
r
r
a
e
s
a
e
l
e e
r s
a
e
l
e
r
,
s
u
t
a
t
s
k
c
o
t
s</p>
      <p>Accounting
5
Supply
actual costs</p>
      <p>Payments
to suppliers
procurement
of goods,
services</p>
      <p>Operational management
unfinished
production
routing technology,
standards
C O S T</p>
      <p>M A N A G E M E N T</p>
      <p>P L A N
At the same time, we believe, it is necessary to be aware how the chosen enterprise
management system integrates with external objects and systems (Fig. 4).</p>
      <p>Common information model</p>
      <sec id="sec-12-1">
        <title>Computer-aided design system (CAD)</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-12-2">
        <title>Computer-aided manufacturing system (CAM)</title>
        <p>State authorities,
regulatory frameworks</p>
        <p>ERP
Service system</p>
        <p>Distribution system
Suppliers</p>
        <p>Customers</p>
        <p>Human resources
management System
Training and retraining</p>
        <p>systems
Vendors and software</p>
        <p>developers
Consulting companies</p>
        <p>Marketing and
e-commerce
Financial system
Fig. 4. An example of interaction of ERP system with external entities and their systems
6</p>
        <p>With schemes given above and on the basis of functional features one can create an
implementation plan of all subsystems, which eventually will become a powerful tool
for managing financial and economic activity of the enterprise.
5</p>
        <p>Built by the authors, based on the analysis of the functional structures of industrial
enterprises of Khmelnytskyi region</p>
        <p>
          Built using [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref13 ref6">1, 6, 13</xref>
          ]
        </p>
        <p>Criteria of Criticality, Readiness, Speed and Costs in
the Enterprise Management System
The analysis shows that most companies are choosing ERP for help with specialized
consulting companies, but even with the involvement of external consultants, the
company should also attract its own experts who can influence the final decision.</p>
        <p>Among the wide range of criteria to select the ERP system should be the following:
functionality of the system; total cost of ownership (acquisition costs, implementation
and support); guarantees of successful implementation; reliability, performance,
system perspective; efficiency and payback period of the project; support level by
integrator after implementation; level of service and the possibility of further
development of the system by our own specialists. The maximum effect after implementing
ERP is potentially dependent on selected priorities in automation of business
processes at the enterprise. In our opinion, analysis of possible automation steps should be
carried out according to the criteria of criticality, readiness, speed and cost.</p>
        <p>With the criticality criteria one can identify "problem areas" in the company, usually
subsystem of sales, marketing and advertising are analyzed to attract new customers and
retain existing ones. To enhance the efficiency of controlling over financial resources you
must first carry out automation of financial management and cost of production. First and
foremost, priority should be given to automation "problem areas" in view of the
relationship of their business processes with other enterprise activities (Fig. 5).</p>
        <p>Cost planning for staff
training and retraining</p>
        <p>Planning for
maintenance costs
...</p>
        <p>Planning
the advertising cost
Financial planning</p>
        <p>Planning marketing costs</p>
        <p>Planning proceeds from
financing activities</p>
        <p>...</p>
        <p>Sales planning
Core business planning</p>
        <p>Production planning
Procurement planning</p>
        <p>
          HR planning
Research [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref16 ref17 ref18">10, 16, 17, 18</xref>
          ] shows that automation of financial and business
enterprises can improve not only the effectiveness of operational control over the use of
funds, but also increase the effectiveness of sales and management subsystem,
procurement personnel management subsystem, marketing activities management
subsystem, etc. It may not be promising to develop your own automation block, but to
integrate an already existing module.
        </p>
        <p>Here, in our opinion an important evaluation criterion is the readiness of
enterprises to introduce an integrated information system, which consists of professional and
psychological readiness of employees and managers. Lack of professional readiness
could lead to the rejection of the project or hiring third-party developers that will
increase the cost of implementation. Psychological readiness may be due to a
significant increase in the functional responsibilities of staff and promote responsibility,
especially at the stage of development and implementation.</p>
        <p>Another criterion that we have defined is speed implementation solution, when
automating site is chosen because of the simplicity of the design and subsystems
implementation.</p>
        <p>Cost component is generally perceived by management as an investment, and
taking into account the fact that ERP has a modular structure, it is recommended to start
a project with low-cost modules, in order not to risk losing the invested funds if for
some reason the project fails. Therefore, ERP introduction should be carried out on
areas of the enterprise where the maximum economic effect is expected, the
implementation process will take place quickly and with minimal cost, and the staff is ready
to change and will be able to use benefits.</p>
        <p>
          Selecting the type of ERP is difficult and responsible task, since these systems are
usually implemented for quite a long time (the average lifetime is 9 years) [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
          ], they
should have expected functionality and reasonable price.
        </p>
        <p>
          When purchasing ERP, you must consider the TCO, which in turn consists of the
following costs [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16 ref17 ref19 ref4 ref7">4, 7, 16, 17, 19</xref>
          ]: preparations for the project (audit of the company,
development of technical specifications, modeling etc.); installation, adjustment and
adaptation of the system to the specifics of the enterprise; simulation, testing and
experimental exploitation; purchase and installation of necessary equipment; training
(users and support personnel for follow-up); hiring additional staff technical support
of the system; transferring data from the previous system; ongoing maintenance and
support (salaries, purchase or repair of equipment, etc.); maintenance services from a
company-developer (hourly consultations, urgent revision etc.).
        </p>
        <p>Since these types of costs can increase the cost of the system by times, compared
with the cost of the software itself, therefore, it is necessary to make a full
precalculation of costs.
6</p>
        <p>Use of Advanced
Economic Security</p>
        <p>Development</p>
        <p>Tools
and</p>
        <p>
          Support
of
The analysis of information technology used in ERP is equally important. If the system
is based primarily on its own development, then there may be a strong dependence on
the supplier company [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref19 ref4">1, 4, 19</xref>
          ]. In our opinion, it is advisable to use proven
technologies, especially those oriented at industry. Especially for large and medium enterprises
we need to focus on the level of implementation of "client-server" architecture using
powerful database management systems of Oracle, IBM and Microsoft companies.
        </p>
        <p>Considering the current tendency to increase competition in the market, you should
also take care of the security system to prevent unauthorized access and so on. It is
necessary to examine mechanisms for data exchange between structural divisions, set
a distributed data access, organize work in the sphere of identifying leaks or external
threats and so on. Of course, the organization of information security is based not
only on the use of software, but also on logistical organization, users’ experience and
their corporate culture.</p>
        <p>
          Effective functioning of ERP depends on the quality of service, including: the ability to
select the necessary and appropriate level of service for the customer; prompt response to
requests and ordered system of control over them; providing advice in real time;
completeness of orders execution; free and prompt elimination of errors by the developer;
availability of favorable conditions for the supply of new versions, etc. [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14 ref16 ref17 ref18">14, 16, 17, 18</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>Research has shown that for automation systems of large and medium enterprises
in Khmelnytskyi region, the quality of service and support comes to the fore in the
long run, and so, when choosing ERP, you can sacrifice a certain functionality of the
system, but not the quality and completeness of the service and support.</p>
        <p>In our opinion, as practical recommendations to domestic enterprises, before
choosing and implementing an ERP system, you need to use the following criteria and
pre-verify: the completeness of reflection in the system of national legislation, the
compliance with the procedure for the implementation of operations adopted in the
enterprise, the clarity of the interface and documentation to users, the functionality of
the system on similar enterprises, taking into account branch characteristics and
specifics of own production, the possibility of branching out within affiliates, integration
with other management systems.
7</p>
        <p>Conclusions
Based on the research and analysis of existing scientific approaches, the article
assesses the advantages of implementing the ERP system at the enterprises of
mechanical engineering, expertly determines its most significant impact on individual
indicators of the enterprises, determines the main criteria for modern management system
requirements to compliance with the resource planning concept. The authors offered
scientific and methodological approach to the application of planning methods for
various types of production depending on the volume of output and assortment, and
also described the advantages and disadvantages of automating business processes at
the enterprises in Khmelnytskyi region depending on the individual types of
automation. The article defines a list of modules that appeared in modern ERP II, singles out
differences between ERP and ERP II, and also provides examples of integration of
subsystems based on information flows and interactions with external business
entities. The authors systematized the criteria for providing benefits of the development
or acquisition of ERP and suggested the use of advanced tools for developing and
maintaining the economic security of enterprises, and presented practical
recommendations on the use of ERP at the enterprises.</p>
        <p>The results of the conducted research confirm that the introduction of the modern
ERP-system at the enterprise allows you to obtain competitive advantages and ensures
compliance with modern world standards for improving the company's rating, leads to
an increase in the market segment, sales growth, creates the ERP-system compliance
with the expectations of the head of the company, because it is the head of the
enterprise who is responsible for setting the task and goals. The introduction of the modern
ERP-system also finds the factors of the false work of some departments of the
enterprise; weakens internal audit, as the quality of external audit increases.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Aldzhanov</surname>
          </string-name>
          , V.:
          <article-title>IT-architecture from A to Z: Theoretical basis [e-book]</article-title>
          .
          <source>Publ: Ridero</source>
          . 396 p. (
          <source>In Russian)</source>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Almajali</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Antecedents of ERP systems implementation success: a study on Jordanian healthcare sector</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Enterprise Information Management. Emerald</source>
          .
          <volume>29</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ), (
          <year>2016</year>
          ), http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/JEIM-03-2015-0024, last accessed
          <year>2019</year>
          /01/06.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>APICS</given-names>
            <surname>Dictionary</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>The essential supply chain reference</article-title>
          , http://apics.org,
          <source>last accessed</source>
          <year>2019</year>
          /01/02.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chase</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Aquilano</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jacobs</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <source>Production and Operations Management; transl. from English. Moscow. Publ. "Williams"</source>
          . 704 p.
          <article-title>(in Russian) (</article-title>
          <year>2004</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>ERP</given-names>
            <surname>Selection</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>: Finding the Right Fit</article-title>
          , http://aberdeen.com/Aberdeen-Library/7701/RAenterprise-resource-planning.aspx,
          <source>last accessed</source>
          <year>2014</year>
          /02/20.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Golitsina</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O. L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Maksimov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N. V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Information systems</article-title>
          , Moscow, Publ. “
          <string-name>
            <surname>Infra-M”</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>(in Russian) (</article-title>
          <year>2009</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ivakhnenkov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S. V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Information technologies of audit and internal control in the context of world integration</article-title>
          .
          <source>Scientific publication, Zhytomyr, Publ. "Ruta" (in Ukrainian)</source>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kolesov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Gartner on the world market for average ERP solutions</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal "PC Week"</source>
          . Vol.
          <volume>29</volume>
          -
          <issue>30</issue>
          ,
          <fpage>683</fpage>
          --
          <lpage>684</lpage>
          (in Russian) (
          <year>2010</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lavinsky</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G. V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Obolenskaya</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T. E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Marinchenko</surname>
            <given-names>B. V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <source>Automated systems for processing economic information, Kyiv</source>
          , Higher School (in Ukrainian) (
          <year>1995</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee J. Krajewski</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Larry P. Ritzman, Manoj K.
          <source>Malhotra: Operations Management: Process Chain and Value Chains, 8th Edition</source>
          , Pearson Education, Inc. (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <article-title>List of National Standards of Ukraine for the creation</article-title>
          ,
          <source>implementation and maintenance of automated and information systems</source>
          , http://nbuv.gov.ua/node/1469, last accessed
          <year>2019</year>
          /01/14.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lysenko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lysenko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V. V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Topical issues of implementation of ERP-systems at domestic enterprises in modern market economy</article-title>
          (in Ukrainian) http://ir.nmu.org.ua/handle/123456789/149397, last accessed
          <year>2018</year>
          /11/07.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O</given-names>
            <surname>'Leary</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Daniel E.:
          <article-title>ERP systems. Modern planning and management of enterprise resources</article-title>
          . Selection, implementation, operation. Moscow, Publ.
          <article-title>"Vershina" (in Russian) (</article-title>
          <year>2004</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rosemann</surname>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wiese</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .:
          <article-title>Measuring the Performance of ERP Software: A Balanced Scorecard Approach</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proceedings of the 10th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (Wellington, December 1-3</source>
          ,
          <year>1999</year>
          ). P.
          <fpage>773</fpage>
          --
          <lpage>784</lpage>
          (
          <year>1999</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15.
          <article-title>State Agency for E-Governance of Ukraine (in Ukrainian) https://www</article-title>
          .e.gov.ua,
          <source>last accessed</source>
          <year>2018</year>
          /12/03.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vasylkiv</surname>
            <given-names>N. M.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>The effectiveness of information systems</article-title>
          .
          <source>Ternopil. Publ: Economichna dumka. 98</source>
          p.
          <article-title>(in Ukrainian) (</article-title>
          <year>2005</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          17.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vereskun</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Methods of evaluation of the efficiency of implementation of information systems at industrial enterprises</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal Theoretical</source>
          and
          <article-title>practical aspects of economics and intellectual property</article-title>
          .
          <source>Issue</source>
          :
          <volume>1</volume>
          (
          <issue>11</issue>
          ), P.
          <fpage>21</fpage>
          --
          <lpage>26</lpage>
          (in Ukrainian) (
          <year>2015</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          18.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yemchuk</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Analysis of the factors determining the effectiveness of the implementation of the information system in the enterprise</article-title>
          . Journal of Dnipro university. Series: Economic. Issue: 4,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Part</surname>
          </string-name>
          . 21. P.
          <volume>76</volume>
          -
          <fpage>82</fpage>
          . (in Ukrainian) (
          <year>2013</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          19.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yurinets</surname>
          </string-name>
          , V.:
          <source>Automated Information Systems in Finances</source>
          , Lviv, Publ.
          <article-title>"LNU named after Franko" (in Ukrainian) (</article-title>
          <year>2004</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>