<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Event-driven Reorganization of Distributed Business Processes in Electrical Energy Systems</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Leibniz University Hannover</institution>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>University of Oldenburg</institution>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>1881</year>
      </pub-date>
      <fpage>0000</fpage>
      <lpage>0003</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Business processes, e.g. economic or operational optimization, in large power systems employs heuristics based on solving a relaxation of the original problem due to the number of actors and components involved as well as the time-criticality for finding feasible solutions. In order to cope with the large number of conflicting objectives in the problem instance, multi-agent systems (MAS) are often chosen in order to find timely solutions while guaranteeing certain fairness aspects. However, utilizing MAS poses specific challenges achieving observability and other non-functional requirements in the context of safety-critical electrical energy systems. To cope with these systemic risks, we will sketch out methods to increase observability and dynamic reorganization in the sense of regulated autonomy.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>smart grids</kwd>
        <kwd>multi-agent systems</kwd>
        <kwd>safety-critical operation</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        The energy transition (Energiewende) introduces rapidly changing requirements into
historically grown, heterogeneous industry and application landscapes. Future energy
system solutions – so-called smart grids – are increasingly IT-based. The increasingly
decentralised and highly automated management of energy sources is changing the
existing communication and energy distribution structure as well as introduces various
new stakeholders to the system. In that sense it is an autonomous cyber-physical system
(ACPS) that is controlled or monitored by highly autonomous computer-based systems,
tightly integrated with the Internet and its users. Physical and software components are
deeply intertwined, each operating on different spatial and temporal scales, exhibiting
multiple and distinct behavioural modalities, and interacting with each other in
numerous ways that change with context [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Additionally, electrical energy systems exhibit special characteristics that set them
apart from other ACPS (e.g. transportation systems). Energy systems are considered a
critical infrastructure (German acronym: KRITIS1) and are indispensable lifelines of
modern societies. They have a size that transcends continents – from North Africa to
Scandinavia, from Ireland to Asia. Phenomena and their dynamics exhibit
instantaneous propagation speed – this is a special challenge with regard to the analysis and
timely reaction, i.e. containability of instabilities. Conflicts of objectives are
omnipresent – monetary, technical, political (national/international) interests meet in both
systems planning as well as operation. Last but not least, the energy system is undergoing
rapid and fundamental change following the energy transition [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. In its course, the
system is digitalized and becoming ICT-reliant, which yields unique systemic risks
considering that the ICT is dependent on a high power quality itself and at the same
time indispensable to ensure that quality. These risks have to be addressed properly in
order to guarantee a safe and stable energy supply.
      </p>
      <p>
        From an ICT-perspective, future power systems are composed of billions of
components – producers and consumers of electrical energy, grid and operating equipment,
markets as well as (local) coordination platforms. This complexity together with
nonlinear system dynamics and almost immediate propagation velocities results in business
processes to be highly decentralized, multi-objective, dynamic, real-time optimization
problems [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3 ref4">3,4</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        One strategy to cope with this complexity is to follow distributed heuristical
optimization approaches on the basis of multi-agent systems (MAS) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3 ref5 ref6 ref7 ref8">3,5,6,7,8</xref>
        ]. However, in
order to apply distributed AI-techniques such as MAS during operation of
safety-critical infrastructures, it is desired to infer the state of the solution quality as well as other
aspects (e.g. convergence behaviour, spatial disparities) on-line and incorporate this
knowledge into operational (autonomous as well as human-in-the-loop)
decision-making.
      </p>
      <p>With multiple business process being executed at the same time and within the same
technical (sub-)system, it is foreseeable that at any given time there is a set ordering
regarding the criticality or priority over a certain number of processes, e.g.
stabilityrelevant processes are more critical than economic dispatch, or large bulk-market
contracts being of higher priority than small-scale decentralized contracts.</p>
      <p>
        The goal of this work is to derive relevant solution parameters of distributed process
optimization and integrating them into existing supervisory automation and control
concepts. This not only allows for facilitating the observability of the most critical
processes but also the controllability of the heuristic solution process by assigning specific
ICT-resources (computationally or communication-specific) to individual processes.
Thus, event-driven reorganization – even temporary centralization of the optimization
process – may be achieved, in the sense of a Smart Grid dynamic regulated autonomy
approach [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref9">9,10</xref>
        ].
      </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Meister</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Ihle</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Lehnhoff und M. Uslar</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>: “Smart Grid Digitalization in Germany by Standardized Advanced Metering Infrastructure and Green Button”</article-title>
          . In: Application of Smart Grid Technologies (Eds.:
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Lamont</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>A. Sayigh)</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Academic Press, Elsevier,
          <source>ISBN 978-0-12-803128-5</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>347</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>371</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          , https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0
          <source>-12-803128- 5</source>
          .
          <fpage>00010</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>6</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Lehnhoff und M. Uslar</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>: “Smart Grid Architecture - Key Elements and Definitions”</article-title>
          . In: Communication,
          <article-title>Control and Security for the Smart Grid</article-title>
          (Eds.:
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Muyeen</surname>
          </string-name>
          , S. Rahman),
          <source>IET, ISBN: 978-1-78561-142-1</source>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Hinrichs</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Lehnhoff</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Sonnenschein: “COHDA: A Combinatorial Optimization Heuristic for Distributed Agents”</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Communications in Computer and Information Science (Eds. J. Filipe, A. Fred)</source>
          , Springer,
          <year>2014</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Krause</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Lehnhoff</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Rehtanz</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E. Handschin und H. F.</given-names>
            <surname>Wedde</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>: “On Feasibility Boundaries of Electrical Power Grids in Steady State”</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: International Journal of Electric Power &amp; Energy Systems - IJEPES</source>
          , Volume
          <volume>31</volume>
          (
          <issue>9</issue>
          ), pp.
          <fpage>437</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>444</lpage>
          , ISSN:
          <fpage>0142</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>0615</lpage>
          , Elsevier,
          <year>2009</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>J.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Bremer und S. Lehnhoff: “Phase-Space Sampling of Energy Ensembles with CMA-ES”</article-title>
          . In: Applications of Evolutionary Computation, (Eds. Sim, Kevin and Kaufmann, Paul), Springer International Publishing, pp.
          <fpage>222</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>230</lpage>
          , ISBN:
          <fpage>978</fpage>
          -3-
          <fpage>319</fpage>
          -77538-
          <issue>8</issue>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>J.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Bremer und S. Lehnhoff: “Enhancing Support Vector Decoders by Integrating an Uncertainty Model”</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Agents and Artificial Intelligence</source>
          (Eds.: J. van den Herik, J. Filipe),
          <source>Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence</source>
          , Springer,
          <source>ISBN 978-3-319-53354-4</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>114</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>132</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Lehnhoff</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Blank</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Klingenberg</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Calabria</surname>
          </string-name>
          , W. Schumacher: “
          <article-title>Distributed Coalitions for Reliable and Stable Provision of Frequency Response Reserve - An Agent-based Approach for Smart Distribution Grids”</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Intelligent Energy Systems</source>
          (
          <article-title>IWIES) collocated with IECON 2013 - the 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society</article-title>
          , IEEE Press,
          <year>2013</year>
          , invited Paper.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H. F.</given-names>
            <surname>Wedde</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Lehnhoff</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E. Handschin und
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Krause</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>: “Establishing Large-Scale Renewable Reserve Capacity through Distributed Multi-Agent Support”</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Industrial Informatics</source>
          , IEEE Press, Vienna, Austria,
          <fpage>2007</fpage>
          -
          <volume>07</volume>
          - 23.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Schumann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. D.</given-names>
            <surname>Lattner</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Timm</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>: „Regulated Autonomy : A Case Study”</article-title>
          . In L. Mönch &amp; G. Pankratz (Eds.),
          <source>Intelligente Systeme zur Entscheidungsunterstützung</source>
          , Teilkonkonferenz der Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (pp.
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>15</lpage>
          ).
          <source>SCS Publishing House</source>
          ,
          <year>2008</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Nieße</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Tröschel: “Controlled Self-Organization in Smart Grids”</article-title>
          ,
          <source>IEEE International conference on systems engineering (IEEE ISSE)</source>
          ,
          <year>2016</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>