<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>International Workshop on
Socio-Technical Perspective in IS Development was held on June</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2019</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>10</volume>
      <issue>2019</issue>
      <abstract>
        <p>Importance of socio-technical perspective in research and practice A socio-technical perspective sees an organization as an emergent whole of multiple systems view - in this perspective a multiplicity of emergent combinations of what may appear as two systems is a key feature - a social system and a technical system as one indivisible whole. The real pattern of behaviour in the organization is determined by the interaction of the two. While analysing management problems of how best to get things done by people, adequate consideration should be given to technology as well as informal and formal interactions of people. Despite that a socio-technical perspective has been around for over a half century, it is often forgotten in the IS discourse today. Consequently, many “new approaches” appear to reflect on IS systems problems, such as modern IT systems poorly adjusted to the external or/and internal environment (e.g. security threats, market changes and , organizational culture) of organizations in which they are (to be) deployed. We strongly believe that it is high time the social-technical perspective took its proper place in IS research, practice and teaching.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>The main purpose of the workshop is to arrange discussions on using a socio-technical
perspective in IS development, the long term goal being to make this workshop a
meeting place for the community of IS researchers and practitioners interested in the
sociotechnical approach. These workshop proceedings are a continuation from last year’s
attempt to set a broad platform for discussion and debate on the benefits and problems
of viewing information systems as socio-technical artefacts.</p>
      <p>There were 18 submissions of various kinds - idea and research papers, experience
reports, position papers, posters and multimedia presentations. Each submission was
reviewed by at least 2, program committee members. The committee decided to accept
16 papers; in addition some papers were reclassified, e.g. from a research paper to a
position paper.</p>
      <p>As the result, the final proceedings consists of 7 position papers, 3 idea and research
papers, 3 experience reports and 3 posters, one of which included a multimedia
presentation. The topics cover various application domains where a socio-technical
perspective can be used, such as security, production, storage, healthcare, etc. The program
also included one invited talk, which also has been included in the proceedings. The
invited talk was devoted to applying to socio-technical systems two important system
theoretical concepts: autopoiesis and homeostasis.</p>
      <p>The STPIS workshop has a tradition to devote half time to papers presentation and
half time to collaborative work. Collaborative sessions at STPIS'19 were devoted to
work in groups on a business case, each group producing a solution based on a
sociotechnical systems approach of their choice. A short presentation of the business case
that was used in the exercise is included in the proceedings.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>The organizers are grateful to the members of Program Committee for their excellent
work of reviewing submitted papers in short time. We are also thankful to EasyChair
for providing us with a tool to manage the workshop free of charge. We are also much
obliged to the ECIS 2019 organizers for their support in organizing the fifth STPIS
workshop.</p>
      <p>June 25, 2019
STPIS’19 organizers</p>
      <p>Stewart Kowalski</p>
      <p>Peter Bednar
Alexander Nolte</p>
      <p>Ilia Bider
©Copyright held by the author(s)</p>
      <p>Program Committee</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>PC member Organization</title>
      <p>Steven Alter University of San Francisco, US
Peter Bednar University of Portsmouth, UK
Ilia Bider Stockholm University, Sweden
Federico Cabitza Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Italy
Umberto Fiaccadori Lund University, Sweden
Simon Foley Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
Thomas Herrmann University of Bochum, Germany
Paul Johannesson Stockholm University, Sweden
Stewart Kowalski Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
Alexander Nolte University of Tartu, Estonia
Gil Regev Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
Lars Taxén Linköping university, Sweden</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>