<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Multiagent Model of Price Dispersion in the Retail Market of Petroleum Products</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>hynsky[</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Andriy Svydenko</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>National Technical University of Ukraine “Ihor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>37, Peremohy Ave., Kyiv, 03056</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Scientific-Technical Center “Psychea”</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>40G, Kyrylivska Str., Kyiv, 04080</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>66</fpage>
      <lpage>83</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>In this study a multiagent model of behaviour of the dispersion of retail prices for petroleum products has been developed, depending on changes of external factors, in particular, sharp changes in wholesale prices. Therefore, there is a need for a model that would not only have the potential to test the existence of a price dispersion as a consequence of the specifics of competition in the market of petroleum products and consumer search strategies, but would have the ability to quantify the price variance as a consequence of the behaviour of individual market agents. The basis of the behaviour of market agents of this model is algorithms of price oligopolistic competition from traders and user price search strategies. Calibration models and verification of historical data of the Kyiv region, where they were previously established empirical data on the dispersion of prices showed a fairly good correspondence between the model and the actual data. In particular, the existence of a price pattern has been established at jump-like changes of wholesale prices. The presence of price strategy of buyers, which are based on the strategy of the base price, is shown. The coincidence of model and real data still needs to be improved.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>multiagent model</kwd>
        <kwd>dispersion prices</kwd>
        <kwd>petroleum products</kwd>
        <kwd>oligopolistic competition</kwd>
        <kwd>search strategies</kwd>
        <kwd>dynamics of dispersion</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>Despite world trends in reducing the share of hydrocarbons in energy consumption, the
petroleum product market remains an extremely important institution for every single
economy on any continent. Relatively long history of the functioning of the market
shows that the central issue of this market is price behaviour. Governments of all
countries must closely monitor changes in prices, especially for their significant
increase, which can lead to negative social consequences. The long-established fact,
both empirical and theoretical, lies in the fact that prices in this market behave as
nonstationary time series. Some features of competition in the market of petroleum
products, as well as significant sensitivity of fluctuations in the level of domestic prices
from external factors, are the cause of such behaviour. The presence of the so-called
price asymmetry is also a characteristic phenomenon, when jumps in prices on the
wholesale market are accompanied by a rapid increase in retail prices and a slow decline
in retail prices after the reduction of wholesale prices.</p>
      <p>
        However, this is not the only problem in this market. Another characteristic
phenomenon is the presence of price dispersion. This means that for the same product,
at the same time, prices even at neighbouring gas stations are usually different.
Establishing the conditions in which firms choose a range of prices was and remains
the main issue in the theory of prices. Starting from the pioneering work of Stigler [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ],
the scientific environment recognizes the role of imperfect information in shaping the
equilibrium price dispersion. In numerous publications on this topic, the idea is that
markets consist of consumers who receive information actively seeking lower prices,
as well as consumers who remain uninformed, as they prefer to avoid the cost of
searching. This behavior allows some firms to set higher prices than others in
equilibrium, even when all firms sell homogeneous goods with identical production
costs. Therefore, the simplest explanation for these price differences, which is that gas
stations are not homogeneous in terms of costs or quality of petroleum products, is not
sufficient. The main reason for the spread of prices in the market of petroleum products,
as well as in the markets of other goods, is the behaviour of consumers who are trying
to find a bargain price. However, establishing evidence that price dispersion is the result
of an inadequate search for consumer spending is not a trivial task. Empirical studies
mostly relied on comparative statistics to determine the role of search in this market. In
a number of studies, regressive dependencies of the price dispersion from the
intermediate part of the search expense are set, while others create a quantity
dependence and price dispersion from the number of firms on the market, which allows
for a formal test for the existence of the price dispersion. In particular, the theoretical
dependence between the search intensity and the price dispersion, which is
nonmonotonic, as well as the reverse, confirms the role of the search, is established. In
particular, the theoretical dependence between the intensity of the search and the price
variance is established, which is nonmonotonic and also inverse, which confirms the
role of the search. However, there is a need to construct a model that could describe the
mechanism of generating a dispersion of prices in the petroleum product market and
allow an assessment of this change in dispersion over the short term.
2
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Related Works</title>
      <p>
        G. Stigler has a fundamental paper [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] in which the phenomenon of price dispersion for
a homogeneous product is established due to incomplete consumer awareness. In
addition, it introduces the concepts of search and price dispersion – “A buyer (or seller)
who wants to identify the most favourable price must be able to identify the various
sellers (or buyers) – a phenomenon I will term search”. However, this paper did not
establish a direct link between price dispersions and user searches. Moreover, Diamond
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ] discovered the famous paradox, establishing a “law of one price”, on which the price
can hold, despite the imperfect information. The Diamond’s paper really shows that
even with the cost of searching for standard terms of the oligopoly of Bertrand, there is
a unique equilibrium with a monopoly price. A little later, in the paper [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ], it was shown
that the market equilibrium is achieved not at one price, but at a certain price
distribution. The fundamentals of customer search theory and its role in price dispersion
were laid down by Varian [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]. The most common assumptions about the optimal rules
for finding this theory are:
─ Firms sell absolutely homogeneous goods;
─ Consumers carry the search costs to find prices beyond the first price;
─ The price distribution is fully assumed by consumers;
─ Consumers can do different ways of searching: for example, a consistent search by
which consumers disclose one price by another at random;
─ The optimal search rule is then reduced to a backup price (constant if the search cost
is linear).
─ Search ceases as soon as the price is below the reserve price.
      </p>
      <p>
        Varian has shown that there is no equilibrium in pure strategies, but equilibrium is
achieved in mixed strategies. Diamond’s paradox and Bertrand’s competition are
extreme cases when all consumers are informed or not informed. This paper looks at
the interesting conclusion about increasing the number of companies operating in the
market. When the number of competitors increases, the likelihood that any particular
seller will successfully sell the product to some informed clients is reduced. As a
consequence, in the equilibrium distribution of prices, higher prices increase their share.
But this effect turns out to be positive for informed customers, because the expected
lower price is decreasing. The reason is that more firms compete and well-informed
buyers pay the lowest price. For unskilled clients, the expected price is clearly
increasing. The gasoline market is a good example of a homogeneous, albeit not perfect,
market where price dispersions are observed. Many consumers are only aware of some
prices, and this gives some monopoly power to gas stations. In many cases, consumers
find themselves in a situation where fuel runs out and have no choice other than filling
their petrol tanks at the first-best filling station they are facing, which gives additional
market power for gas stations. Prices change quite often, and to determine which
gasoline station has the cheapest fuel in this market is a non-trivial task. The price
variation in the fuel markets was widely documented in the scientific literature. In
particular, publications on this topic [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref5 ref6 ref7 ref8 ref9">5-10</xref>
        ] examined the dependence of the price
dispersion on the density of vendors on the number of gas stations in the radius of 1.5 –
2.5 miles around each station.
      </p>
      <p>
        The price variation is measured by unexplained price fluctuations, namely, the
square of the residues of the logarithmic regression of market characteristics, including
the density of sellers. It was established that the increase in the number of neighbouring
gas stations is associated with a decrease in the price dispersion. Lewis [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ] agrees on
two previous approaches, using station-level data to control differentiation, and
examines the link between price variability and local market characteristics. The data
includes prices for 327 gas stations in the San Diego area each Monday 2000 and 2001
(91 weeks). The paper finds a negative connection between the density of sellers and
the price dispersion, as in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ], and confirms and complements this result by introducing
the difference between the groups of consumers who use elite fuel and groups that use
simpler fuel grades. According to [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ], data on petrol prices from the Netherlands
showed that with increasing competition, the price dispersion is increasing: low prices
are decreasing and high prices rise on average. As a result, competition has an
asymmetric impact on prices, and all consumers, regardless of the amount of prices
they are watching, benefit from an increase in the number of gas stations. However, the
gain from this is greater for informed consumers. The model proposed by [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ], and
develops the Varian’s sales model, yielded the following results.
      </p>
      <p>
        Identification of the role of imperfect information cannot be made by simply
checking the usual comparative static of the dispersion of prices for costs or benefits of
the search, or the number of enterprises on the market. Price dispersion becomes a
nonmonotonic function of these variables if we allow consumers to adjust their
strategies for finding equilibrium. Using a new test of rank spreads and price spreads
between pairs of stations, it has been found that the time dispersion of the prices at the
market level is consistently higher than for stations at one crossroads. This is consistent
with the theory of consumer search, since the dispersion in the latter group is carried
out only through the differentiation of petroleum products. At the same time, the
assumption that the development of modern communication technologies will
automatically eliminate the problem of the variance of prices themselves did not justify.
So, on the data of Italian motorways [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ], found that increasing transparency of prices
had little effect on the level of price dispersion. Analysis of customer transaction data
shows that less than 10% of consumers effectively use price data.
      </p>
      <p>
        The above results of outstanding researchers have proved not only the existence of
a dispersion of prices in the market of petroleum products as a consequence of the
search behavior of buyers, but also allowed to find quantitative dependence of price
characteristics on the infrastructure parameters of the market and the behavior of market
actors. However, many questions remain unclear. One of the difficult problems is the
estimation of the change in the variance of retail prices in the case of spin-off changes
in wholesale prices. As already noted, in such cases there is a phenomenon of price
asymmetry caused by the behavior of participants in the oligopolistic market of
petroleum products. This phenomenon was not studied by the classical theory, but in
recent decades, by the efforts of many researchers, this gap has largely been overcome,
but only with the assumption of a hypothesis of a single price. The question of how the
variation in retail prices in wholesale jumps has attracted the attention of researchers
recently, in particular Noel [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ], based on retail gas prices (known as Edgeworth price
cycles), has established a two-way link between price dispersion and consumer search.
The search activity not only affects the variance, as it was well documented, but the
price variance also affects the search. This is an extremely interesting result, which,
however, did not eliminate the need to develop a model for assessing the dynamics of
the dispersion of retail prices at the usual wholesale price jumps, and not for the case
of exogenous shocks, as was investigated by Noel. For this non-trivial problem, it is
necessary to have an appropriate methodology for the solution.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Data analysis</title>
      <p>In this paper we study of the level of dispersion and its dynamics at the data on gasoline
prices in the retail market of petroleum products of Ukraine for separate filling stations
were provided by the Scientific-Technical Centre “Psychea”. The choice of gasoline,
as a fuel, is explained by the higher homogeneity of consumers, compared with
consumers of diesel fuel. However, despite the homogeneity of the market of petroleum
products, in particular the gasoline market, the product market boundaries were clearly
limited to cover the most homogeneous product:
─ Only non-branded gasoline, which falls under the state standard of quality, is
involved in the consideration.
─ Gasoline of the brand А-95 is considered, because this type of fuel has the most
homogeneity of consumers.</p>
      <p>A comparative analysis of regional petroleum products markets in Ukraine showed
existent of a daily dispersion of prices for gas stations belonging to different owners, as
well as a significant difference in the level of price dispersion between individual
regions of the country (Fig. 1, 2). Although there is a certain correlation between the
level of retail prices and the level of dispersion, the market concentration may also
affect the level of dispersion. Therefore, the study of the phenomenon of price
dispersion is advisable to do for individual regions, and not for the whole country as a
whole, because it will distort the results. Therefore, a sample of historical data of retail
prices for A-95 gasoline of the Kyiv region for the period 2012-2017 was selected for
the study.</p>
      <p>The analysis behaviour gasoline prices for years 2012-2017 showed that most
developments in the petroleum product market characterized by unique dispersion, but
for intermittent changes in retail prices, to some extent, can assert the presence of the
characteristic pattern of behaviour dispersion. In Fig. 3 shows a typical pattern of
dispersion behaviour at a jump in retail prices caused by fluctuations in world oil prices.
A characteristic feature of the dispersion is a significantly higher level of dispersion in
the course of price growth and its return to the initial level during a decline.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Model</title>
      <p>There are many models of behavior of retail prices in the market of petroleum products.
The overwhelming majority, including those that quantify the price dispersion
phenomenon in the fuel market, are based on econometric approaches. However, for
the study of the influence of the behavior of individual market agents on the behavior
of market prices, the multi-agent approach seems more relevant. The bottom line is that
multi-agent model of petroleum product markets can more flexibly take into account
the different structure and rules for the functioning of national markets and the behavior
of market agents.</p>
      <p>
        The model of [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ] focuses on the interaction between gas stations and the diffusion
of prices from one gas station to another in the territorial dimension. Many aspects of
using the multi-agent approach to competition in oligopolistic markets were studied by
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14 ref15">14-15</xref>
        ]. The agent who makes the decision to change the price is a gas station and the
influence of the gas station owner is absent. However, this approach is not universal. In
some markets for petroleum products, in particular in the Ukrainian petroleum product
market, prices for each of the gas stations are set by the owners of the networks. Prices
can be the same at all gas stations or different, but at the same time during the change
in prices observed their equal increase in absolute terms. This approach was
implemented for the model of the phenomenon of asymmetry of retail prices and their
prediction in the retail market of petroleum products in Ukraine [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
        ]. For these models,
the main indicator, on the basis of which the conformity of the model with real data
was checked, was determined by the average retail price. Such a model enables to
reproduce the behaviour of retail networks, based on a comparison of the average price
in the model and the average market price. However, the analysis of the behaviour of
dynamics of price dispersion in this model was not foreseen. To show this phenomenon,
the model has been refined. So let’s determine the main assumptions and
simplifications that are put into the model:
─ At the gas station only one type of fuel is used (gasoline A-95).
─ Consumers have only cars.
─ The market is limited to a certain area.
─ The list of retail networks is deterministic and unchanged.
─ Retail networks change prices at the same time at all gas stations and at the same
absolute value.
─ The location of the gas station corresponds to their actual location in the specified
area.
─ Consumers are evenly distributed throughout the territory.
      </p>
      <p>It should also be noted that an improved multi-agent model takes into account the basic
means of state regulation of the pricing of retail networks. In particular, unlike
petroleum products markets in some countries, where the change in retail prices is not
forbidden for one day, the model takes into account the rule that operates in the
Ukrainian petroleum product market, where retail networks can only change prices
once a day. In the multi-agent petroleum market model there are the following agents:
retail chain, gas station, consumer and trader. According to the model, the daily
activities of petroleum products trading consist of the following actions: consumers
purchase fuel, retail networks collect statistics from gas stations, gas stations if
necessary, order a new consignment of fuel from the trader, interaction between the gas
station and the trader, retail networks analysing all available information, set prices for
the next day. The software model is represented by the following class diagram (Fig. 4).</p>
      <p>The base class of each agent is MAgent, which is followed by agents of the gas station
(MAzs class), retail network (MAzsNet class) and trader (class MTrader). For
abstraction of a separate modeling, there is the MSimulation class, which manages the
whole model and provides a set of tools for working with the model. The
MInformSystem class is an interface for agent communication and information support.
It should be noted that in the absence of a dedicated state agent, his functions in this
model are assigned to this class, namely: to provide information on the list of taxes paid
by retail networks and their current rates. The dynamics of the interaction between the
flows of agents is shown in Fig. 5.
In the proposed multi-agent model, the algorithm for retail network behaviour is based
on states. The model outlines the following agent states retail network: market
followup (S1), strategy changes (S2), trade stop (S3), return to market (S4). State S1
implements the behaviour of the agent in the presence of profits during periods of
decline in prices and for their minor fluctuations during periods of high margins. State
S2 realizes the agent's response to a sharp change in the market situation: a leap of
prices, a sharp decline in demand, and so on. The states S3 and S4 implement market
exit strategies if it is impossible to get the profit and return to the market in the event
of such an opportunity. Fig. 6 shows a diagram of states of the mechanism of
decisionmaking by the agent “Network”.</p>
      <p>Agent’s behavioral algorithm Network in state S1 has the following appearance:</p>
      <p>END</p>
      <p>END
ELSE</p>
      <p>IF price_c &gt; 0 AND
current_trader_price_c &lt; 0 AND
competitors_prrice_c &lt; 0 AND
competitors_prrice - price &lt; -0.5 THEN</p>
      <p>delta = (competitors_prrice – price)*Pd;
ELSE</p>
      <p>IF price_c &gt; 0 AND price_c &lt; Pd AND
current_trader_price_c &lt; 0.1 THEN</p>
      <p>delta = (optimal_price - price) *
PrM * last_buy_prrice_c * 0.75 +
0.25 * competitors_prrice_c * Ck;</p>
      <p>ELSE</p>
      <p>delta = 0;</p>
      <p>END</p>
      <p>END
END
price = price + delta;
To analyse the current situation, each agent has a statistical module that, with the help
of the Ordinary Least Squares method, linearly defines the trajectory of the main
indicators. Variables with suffixes “_c” denote the coefficient of the linear equation
with the corresponding variable. Analysis of real data showed that retail networks
mostly do not adjust the prices daily for a small value, and make a change in prices at
least a certain value (usually it is 0.1 – 0.3 UAH / litre). Therefore, for the formation of
the correct dispersion dynamics, the rules for the formation of threshold price changes
by each network are additionally prescribed. In addition, in the price change algorithm,
3 main drivers are allocated, which form the necessary level of prices in the usual
situation:
─ The behaviour of wholesale (current_trader_price) prices with respect to the prices of
last fuel purchases (last_by_price).
─ Price behaviour of competing networks (competitors_prrice).
─ Optimal price that maximizes profit (optimal_price).</p>
      <p>We determine the optimum price as maximizing the profit of the retail network, taking
into account current demand:
profit  D(P,Pavg )P Tax  Costs  max</p>
      <p>Pc  P 1.4Pacg
(1)
(2)
where D  P, Pavg   a0  a1 P  Pavg – function of estimating the volume of sales of fuel</p>
      <p>Pavg
at the gas station; Pavg – average fuel price within a radius of K km from the location of
the gas station; P – the fuel price of the agent, the variable for which the optimization
takes place; Tax – Tax Component; Costs – Costs; Pc – the price of fuel purchases. The
demand function coefficients (α0 and α1) are automatically evaluated for each agent
individually and specified at each step of the model during simulation. It should be
noted that the establishment of both the upper and lower bounds of this indicator is
dictated by both insufficiently studied demand function and consumer behaviour. The
formation of the initial level of dispersion is achieved by setting variables and constant
costs for each network based on real estimates of these indicators with some correction
on the assumption of model and the stability of the initial state of the model.
4.2</p>
      <p>Algorithms of Consumer Behaviour
As the results of previous studies have shown, consumer strategy with the search for a
base price can generate asymmetric behaviour of retail prices. Therefore, based on the
basic algorithm of consumer behaviour, the search for the base price is chosen: the
consumer searches until he finds a price not higher than the price of the previous
purchase. At the same time, as you know, consumers are not homogeneous, and among
them there are groups with other patterns of behaviour: consumer orientation at the
price and random selection of gas stations.</p>
      <p>The algorithm of consumer behaviour with the search for the base price is presented
in Fig. 7. The consumer makes several attempts to find a price lower than the price of
the last purchase of fuel. In the basic version of the model, the number of attempts to
search is 5. The behaviour of consumers without a search is equivalent to a uniform
distribution of demand for all filling stations. The scheme of the algorithm is shown in
Fig. 8.</p>
      <p>The behavior of price-oriented consumers is carried out by the construction by each
consumer of distribution at the gas station in accordance with the price level at the gas
station. The basis of such a distribution is an exponential distribution with
modifications based on the following empirical assumptions: the consumer is guided
by the relative price level when selecting a gas station, the lower the price, the greater
the probability of choosing this gas station. Given the complexity of estimating the
additional distribution parameters it is assumed that the mathematical expectation is
equal to 1, and the density function has the following form as follows:
prob = 1 e( pricemin( price))
k
(3)
where price – price at the gas station, min(price) – the minimum price among all the
gas stations in the field of consumer’s vision, k – the coefficient of normalization of
distribution density:
where M – amount of fuel station that in field of consumer’s vision. This list of observed
gas stations prepared for each consumer using empirical assumption that maximum
distance from consumer location to station must not exceed 7 km. This value was
determined on the basis of a survey of drivers in the region of Kyiv and has a
preliminary assessment character, which requires a separate study. However, in order
of magnitude it coincides with the values of the authors in the literature cited above.</p>
      <p>Due to the lack of reliable data on consumer preferences in the choice of gas stations,
the basic algorithm of consumer behaviour will be considered the algorithm for finding
the base price. However, for comparison, all types of consumer behaviour algorithms
were used.
Nelder-Mead method was used to calibrate the model. The criterion of optimality was
the sum of absolute deviations of average retail prices in the model from their real
values. In total, 130 steps were taken to select the optimal model parameters. These
parameters are the following parameters (the notation corresponds to the variables in
algorithm above):
─ PrM (with value 7.1195) – optimal price correction coefficient, which determines
the effect of the deviation of the calculated optimal price from the current price at
the gas station;
─ Pd (with value 0.05) – a coefficient that determines the magnitude of the impact of
competitors prices absolute value on the price of gas stations;
─ Ck (with value -2.8899) – coefficient, which determines the influence of the price
trend of competitors to the price of gas stations;
─ Trk (with value 1.0292) – coefficient, which determines the effect of wholesale
prices change on the price at the gas station;
─ Pd2 (with value -16.861) – the threshold of competitors average price delta, which
is used to switch the pricing approach in the algorithm.</p>
      <p>As a result of the selection of parameters, it was possible to achieve qualitative detection
of the dynamics of retail prices (Fig. 9), while the dynamics of dispersion repeats the
actual trends (Fig. 10). That is, the multi-agent model identifies a pattern of price
dynamics and dynamics of price dispersion. It should be noted that in general, some
discrepancy between the finite level of the real and the model dispersion can be dictated
by the local peculiarity of the jump. A slightly lower dispersion level of 75-90 model
days is caused by the early reaction of retail networks of the lower price segment. Such
an early reaction to the rise in prices in these networks is due to the existence of a single
algorithm of behaviour as retail networks operating on both purchased fuel and
selfproduced fuel. Therefore, in some cases, the decision to change prices in such networks
may occur somewhat later than other networks in connection with the monthly schedule
of processing capacity.
Along with the calibration of the model of the dynamics of the dispersion of retail prices
with the use of the algorithm for searching the base price for consumers, the possibility
of forming adequate dispersion estimation for other types of consumer behaviour was
also checked. In Fig. 11 shows a comparison of the dynamics of retail price dispersion
by various consumer behaviour algorithms. Other patterns of consumer behaviour have
a fundamentally different dynamics of dispersion. In cases of search and price targeting,
almost the same growth of dispersion is observed during the growth of retail prices.
However, in the case of price-targeting, the dispersion, and somewhat lowered while
finding retail prices for the “plateau”, began to increase again after falling prices. On
the one hand, this testifies to the discrepancy of such behaviour with real situations.
However, on the other hand, there may be a simple non-compliance of the rules of retail
networks with a similar behaviour of consumers. It should be noted that the re-training
of the model with the use of the algorithm of targeting the price was not carried out,
because the replacement of the algorithm has a small effect on the dynamics of average
prices. The dynamics of dispersion in the use of consumers without a search showed
that such a type of consumers cannot be dominant in the market given the significant
difference in dispersion from the real.
This paper proposes a multiagent model of the phenomenon of dispersion of prices in
the market of petroleum products. The conducted research showed that the multiagent
model of oil products market as an oligopolistic competitive environment, in which fuel
consumers are guided by the strategy of price search, generates the phenomenon of the
price variance regardless of the initial conditions of the variance values. The agents’
interaction was based on oligopolistic competition rules and consumer price search
strategies. This model was tested on the price data for gasoline in the Kyiv region of
the Ukrainian oil market. The choice of data for this region and the choice of gasoline
as a commodity were dictated by the desire to identify the effect of dispersion due to
the existence of a search strategy for consumers on a market with a homogeneous
product. At the same time, the existence of a dispersion of retail prices in the market of
petroleum products has been shown as a result of oligopolistic competition of traders
and price search behavior of buyers, as well as the growth of price dispersion at price
jumps of wholesale prices. It is shown well enough to predict the appearance of this
pattern at price jumps. It has been established that the best approach to real data, both
in terms of price and dispersion, has been shown by the consumer strategy with the
search for the base price. The availability of other search strategies has not been
confirmed. Comparison of model calculations and real data showed a fairly satisfactory
coincidence, which, however, needs to be improved. However, to do this, there is need
to conduct additional research in mixed search strategies for different categories of
users.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stigler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>The economics of information</article-title>
          .
          <source>The J. of Polit. Econ</source>
          .
          <volume>69</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>213</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>225</lpage>
          (
          <year>1961</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Diamond</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>A model of price adjustment</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. of Econ. Theory</source>
          .
          <volume>3</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>156</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>168</lpage>
          (
          <year>1971</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stiglitz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Equilibrium in product markets with imperfect information</article-title>
          .
          <source>Am. Econ. Rev</source>
          .
          <volume>69</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>339</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>345</lpage>
          (
          <year>1979</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Varian</surname>
          </string-name>
          , H.:
          <article-title>A model of sales</article-title>
          .
          <source>Am. Econ. Rev</source>
          .
          <volume>70</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>651</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>659</lpage>
          (
          <year>1980</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lach</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Existence And Persistence Of Price Dispersion: An Empirical Analysis</article-title>
          .
          <source>The Rev. of Econ. and Stat</source>
          .
          <volume>84</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>433</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>444</lpage>
          (
          <year>2002</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Barron</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Taylor</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Umbeck</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Number of sellers, average prices, and price dispersion</article-title>
          .
          <source>Int. J. of Ind. Org</source>
          .
          <volume>22</volume>
          (
          <issue>8-9</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>1041</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1066</lpage>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Baye</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Morgan,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Scholten</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>P. P.</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Price Dispersion in The Small And in The Large: Evidence From An Internet Price Comparison Site</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. of Ind. Econ</source>
          .
          <volume>52</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>463</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>496</lpage>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lewis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Price Dispersion and Competition with Differentiated Sellers</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. of Ind. Econ</source>
          .
          <volume>56</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>654</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>678</lpage>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lach</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Moraga</surname>
            <given-names>González</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>J.L.</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Asymmetric price effects of competition</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. of Ind. Econ</source>
          .
          <volume>65</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>767</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>803</lpage>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chandra</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tappata</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Consumer search and dynamic price dispersion: an application to gasoline markets</article-title>
          .
          <source>The RAND J. of Econ</source>
          .
          <volume>42</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>681</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>704</lpage>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rossi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chintagunta</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Price transparency and retail prices: Evidence from fuel price signs in the Italian highway system</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. of Mark. Res. 53.3</source>
          ,
          <fpage>407</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>423</lpage>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Noel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Gasoline Price Dispersion and Consumer Search: Evidence from a Natural Experiment</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. of Ind. Econ</source>
          .
          <volume>66</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>701</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>738</lpage>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Heppenstall</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Using Hybrid Agent-Based Systems to Model Spatially-Influenced Retail Markets</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. of Art. Societ. and Soc. Sim</source>
          .
          <volume>9</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ) (
          <year>2006</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ramezani</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bosman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>La Poutré</surname>
          </string-name>
          , H.:
          <article-title>Adaptive Strategies for Dynamic Pricing Agents</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology</source>
          , volume
          <volume>02</volume>
          . IEEE Computer Society (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Levin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>McGill</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nediak</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Dynamic Pricing in the Presence of Strategic Consumers and Oligopolistic Competition</article-title>
          .
          <source>Man. Sci</source>
          .
          <volume>55</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>32</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>46</lpage>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Galchynsky</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Svydenko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>The Asymmetry of Price in the Petroleum Products Market of Ukraine</article-title>
          . Brit. J. of Econ.,
          <source>Man. &amp; Trade</source>
          .
          <volume>13</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>14</lpage>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          17.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Galchynsky</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Svydenko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Multiagent model of prices dispersion on the retail market of petroleum products</article-title>
          .
          <source>SHS Web of Conferences</source>
          .
          <volume>65</volume>
          ,
          <issue>04021</issue>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ). DOI:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1051/shsconf/20196504021
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>