The paper deals with the problem of sustainable development and innovative integral modeling and forecasting approach in the management of technogenic objects and processes (TOP) as a system of socio-eco-economic and humanitarian type (SEEH). Based on the use of information and innovation technologies in order to forecast the non-linear dynamics of eco-economic and socio-humanitarian systems, integrated stochastic models of objects and processes were developed and studied, suitable for the conditions of systemic crises. The paper handles the aspect of integration of 4 business and functioning areas of the modern complex systems. It proposes a general conceptual integrated model, generalized synergetic model of dynamics, considering different uncertainty (stochastic and chaotic components). The paper examines the aspects of integration of multiple business areas and sectors of the modern complex systems functioning and developing under the present conditions of nonlinearity, instability and crises. An integrated stochastic non-linear phase-space growth dynamics model was developed and studied to forecast the development of the state of an innovative economy. The paper looks into the aspects of activity management of the modern complex systems functioning and developing under the present conditions of instability.
The knowledge of the scientific potential on economics was assigned to V. Heyets
[
The conception of sustainable, safe, secure and viable development provides for a change in the paradigms of the traditional economy, humanization and ecologization of its core principles, search for general approaches and coordination between the development conceptions of environmental and economic systems.
The problem of sustainable development features the following aspects: systemic,
synergetic, environmental, economic, mathematical, informational, philosophical,
legal, educational, etc. The paper handles the aspect of integration of 4 business and
functioning areas of the systems: socio-eco-economic and humanitarian, including
spiritual-moral and cultural technologies. The sustainable development paradigm
requires transition from the investigation of separate functioning isolated systems to the
investigation of integral evolving systems, actualization and strengthening of
systemsynergetic links of an open system and its environment. The existing
“monodisciplinary” conceptions, linear static models, reproductive-representative
methods (reflecting the linearity of our knowledge), profitability and optimality criteria
should give place to interdisciplinary, system-synergetic, evolutionary non-linear
models and methods of forecasting and knowledge acquisition, management (reflecting
the non-linearity and non-Gaussian character of the laws of nature and society), criteria
of rationality, local optimality, and correspondence to the “common sense”.
“Interdisciplinary” paradigm is understood not in the intuitive, technocratic relationship
of disciplines, accumulation of quanta of knowledge and skills, but in the actualization
of individual and public intellect, education and learning of new self-organized and
sustainable structures [
Under the current complex conditions and as the modern economy advances, a need arises to consider its forecasting problems in a new fashion. This is connected with the increased influence of globalization processes and uncertainty and risk factors on the economy and business performance of individual countries and regions. Existing forecasting methods and models rely, to a considerable extent, on the application of econometric models. This paper analyzes the opportunities of development forecasting on the basis of the approximation of the integral stochastic growth model in the form of recurrent equations formed taking into account the increment properties of the Wiener random processes. This considers only current or initial state of the economy.
Only integration of the modeling methods for socio-economic, environmental,
cultural and spiritual and other processes will ensure sustainability and viability of
development of the entire system [
Also, note that a system-thinking and active person usually forecasts and considers his/her performance results, compares his/her capabilities, considers environmental interests, those of future generations and the need for noospheric development.
The purpose of the paper is to develop and investigate problems of non-linear forecasting, in particular on the basis of the integral socio-eco-economic stochastic model of the dynamics of technogenic objects and processes functioning under the conditions of systemic crises.
The problem of modeling, forecasting, optimal management and decision making in
socio-ecological-economic systems and in science as a whole is the main and urgent.
The purpose of this work is to study the methods, principles and models for forecasting
and management used in various socioeconomic processes and systems, as well as the
introduction of a new class of models for solving problems of modeling and prediction
of socio-ecological and economic processes. The work is based on the analysis of
modern methods of dynamic modeling and forecasting of various processes and
systems [
In this paper, technogenic objects and processes (TOP) mean technogenic production enterprises (TPE) or technogenic regional production operations (TRPO), or technogenic regions (TR), technogenic economic object (TEO), etc. Let us designate all these as TOP.
Under the current conditions of instability and crises, the problem of developing analysis, modeling, forecasting and decision-making methods and technologies for sustainable development of viable socio-economic systems is becoming even more topical. These systems are characterized by the complexity of the structure and behavior, synergeticity, non-linearity and have other “NO” and “MANY” factor characteristics.
Moreover, another very important problem includes investigation of systems with integral properties, i.e. systems including in their structure socio-economic and humanitarian subsystems (SEEH) as the systems of the future (noospheric type systems). Local production systems of regional level, such as technogenic industrial systems (TIS) are also SEEH type systems.
To investigate and solve these problems, management and decision-making methods
and models based on the object-oriented approach have been traditionally used.
However, a series of scientific publications and scientific schools have recently
appeared, which lay emphasis on the importance and necessity of recording the
behavior dynamics of a management subject, use of the subject-oriented approach and
reflection to resolve the said tasks [
The paper proposes the review and analysis of some findings obtained in the recent years by different authors for macro- and micro-modeling of the dynamics of ecoeconomic and socio-humanitarian systems and processes which are attributed to TOP and function and develop under the complex conditions of non-linearity, instability and crises.
Most of the previously created models of socio-eco-economic systems (SEES) have theoretical and deterministic nature and are rather problematic from the viewpoint of the adequacy and availability of information for their implementation. In this connection, the objective of technogenic regional production operations (TRO) management under the conditions of crisis causes the objective necessity of improving methods, models and information technologies on the basis of stochastic equations for SEEH management.
The key requirement of the sustainable development paradigm includes creation of existence conditions for future generations by means of restricted use of natural resources, establishment of natural resources and environment recovery cycles together with social capital development – all these can only be realized based on the use of scientific and technical achievements on the back of the high innovation activity. Therefore, the innovative development paradigm conceptually justifies the way for achievement of sustainable growth of TRO (TOP) with the help of development of the human potential and reduction of the TRO load on people and the environment.
To improve the TRO management efficiency amid crisis, one should positively influence all its structural components on which the success of the long-term TRO activities depends. Sustainable development of the TRO requires such choice and combination of its component parts to ensure harmonious functioning of the TRO as a whole. One of the main drivers of increasing the operating efficiency of the TRO includes intensification of production, which is crucially influenced by science. Intellectual capital of the TRO is an internal resource capable of giving new innovative advantages to it. It is important that the innovation activities of the TRO aimed at getting over crisis events result in the increased level of their systematicity, and a synergetic effect was obtained owing to this.
The papers [
This research represents the development of the findings of the authors’ papers
[
The conceptual model of forecasting and management of eco-economic processes
(EEP) of a technogenic economic object (TEO) under the conditions of “NO and
MANY factors” available, can be presented in the form of a set-theoretical model as a
tuple [
Then the task of optimal eco-economic forecasting, i.e. determining a predictor for both internal and external processes can be formulated as follows: determine the estimate xˆ(tkT ), 0,1,... of the state vector x(tk+Δ) with the preset forecast step Δ on the basis of multiple eco-economic observations {y(t), t [t0,tk ]} and based on the preset FOC Kp.
Now the EEC task is to determine the effective integral management vector U U екn ,U екl on the bases of the estimates xˆ(tkT ), 0,1,... and nonlinear dynamic eco-economic model of the TEO that ensures achievement of the goal G with a preset generalized eco-economic criterion Ku and constraints taking into account the uncertainty and risks.
The multiplicative-additive stochastic model with the chaotic dynamics can be generally presented as vector equations: x A(t)x(t)[ X 0 x(t)] D(t),
A(t) a(t) (t) (t), D(t) d (t) (t) or, multiplicative-additive stochastic model with the chaotic dynamics and with management, i.e. taking into account action managers: x A(t)x(t)[ X 0 x(t)] D(t) P(t),
A(t) a(t) (t) (t), D(t) d (t) (t), P(t) p(t) (t)u(t).
The observation model is represented as follows:
y(t) H (t)x(t) (t).
Here, the following designations are used: ξ(t), ζ(t), η(t) – multiplicative-additive stochastic components in the models (2)-(4), and λ(t) – chaotic component in the system model (2). Other designations are shown below.
The integral socio-eco-economic dynamic behavioral model with spiritual and
moral variables can be conceptually presented in a general (block) form [
Synergetic dynamics model of the non-linear stochastic system with the chaotic behavior:
n j 3 2 xi wi biui t , xi ii t xi t X j1 aij t k1 xk t l1 dil rl2 i 1, n, xi 0 xi0 , where i , wi – stochastic components of the model; {aij(t)} – non-stationary components of the model; {dil} – diffusion coefficients determining the level of distribution of the state variables; ΣX – aggregate maximum (maximum allowable) value of the vector x, {λi} – set of parameters causing chaotic nature.
In particular, this model can be also represented as an equation system: X i / t Ai [i (ri X i ji bij X i X j ai X i2 ) Di (x, y)X i ] i ui , where Xi – coordinates of the system state vector, where Xi ≡ Xi(t, x, y); i, j = 1, 2, …, n – reproduction (duplication, growth, development, etc.) coefficient; ai – saturation parameter limiting growth (reproduction); bij – subsystem interaction parameter (between business entities); Di(x, y) – diffusion factor of the i-th subsystem (of the economic entity) in the point (x, y); ξi ≡ ξi(t, x, y) and ζi ≡ ζi(t, x, y) – stochastic multiplicative and additive components of the model, respectively; ui ≡ ui(t, x, y) – coordinates of the management vector, i.e. vector of managerial decisions; Ai – scaling factor; – Laplacian, i.e. (*) 2 (*) x2 2 (*) y 2 and t[0, T] – time interval of the system functioning and development.
Such models describe and cover rather wide class of complex processes and
systems, including the noospheric model of stable development (NMSD) [
The system has synergetic (or cybernetic) description, if the effectively built operator D is such that the state of the system at each point of time t (t0, T(t0)) can be built based on the vector values x(τ), τ (t1, t0), provided that all the external managing actions are fixed:
x(t)=D(x(τ), ε, η, u), t (t0, T(t0)), τ (t1, t0), where ε(t, r) – random action with the known probabilistic characteristics; η(t, r) Gη – action predetermined by the extent of uncertainty; Gη, u Rk – managing actions; r – spatial variable (vector).
Consequently, the integrated stochastic model of the growth dynamics for forecasting the development of the innovative economy can be represented in the form of the following system of difference equations: (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (12*) (13) (13*) (14) (15) Rt Rt ( R Rt K Kt Yt L Lt ) R t , R 0 R0
Rt Rt (d Kt , Lt , Rt K Kt L Lt Yt ) R t , Zt Zt ( g (Zt ) f * (Ct , Kt , Lt , Rt )(1 Ct )) Z t , Z (0) Z0 , zt zt ( z zt E t 1 L1 (t)Lt 2 K2 (t)Kt 3 ) z t ,
t t (t G t 1 L11 (t) L1t 2 K1 (t) Kt 3 s(t) 4 ) t ,
L1t L1t ( L1 L1t D t 1 L21 (t) L1t 2 ) L1 t , st st ( s st H t 1 L1 (t)Lt 2 K2 (t)Kt 3 z3 (t)zt 4 ) s t , Kt Kt ( K (t) Iht Ct Dt Bt ) K t , K 0 K0 ,
Ih t Iht (rIh (t) h0 I0 ) Ih t , Ih (t0 ) h0 I (t0 ), Сt Ct {At Kt (1 )Kt } At Kt C t , (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) where Δ – step of the time interval (forecast step), for which calculations will be made; ξt – realization of the random value which is subject to the standard normal law with the average equal to zero and dispersion equal to one. Also note that here z(t), s(t), τ(t), φ(t) are the indexes of the respective basic indicators.
Note that computer realization of the stochastic difference (discrete) equations (9) – (20) will require transition to the averaged variables x(t)=(Y(t), K(t), L(t), R(t), Z(t), z(t), s(t), τ(t), φ(t), Ih(t), C(t)), i.e. to their expectation values.
Optimal control / management criteria options. Eco-economic development strategy selection criterion:
M[Ф(С, Y, D, B)]→max, where Ф(С, Y, D, B) – welfare function, and М – expectation value symbol.
Consequently, the hierarchical optimization model of the system is obtained in the following form: М{Z} min, М{K} max, Z (Z , K , L, R, c), K (K , L, R, c).
In case of a “small” integral management model, utility function (UF) is a function of the parameters / variables u~ 1, 2 , 3 , 4 , where {αk(t), k=1, ..., 4} – shares of costs for non-manufacturing, environmental costs, R&D efforts, for safety and security, innovation and information technologies, etc., and then the following relationship will be the optimality criterion:
T (c, k, z, L, , S ) u 1, 2 , 3 , 4 exp t dt max .
t0 {i }
To resolve the EEC tasks on the basis of the presented stochastic and deterministic
models, one can use the known classical methods of optimal control with restrictions
[
Generally, the optimization criterion can be represented as
T (a) u 1, 2 , 3 , 4 ,... exp t dt {mi }ax .
t0 This requires even higher integration of models and criteria (and restrictions) of management optimization and DP.
It is also important to consider criteria of random (stochastic) factors of multiplicative and adaptive impact in the models.
In other words,
T (a) M[ u 1, 2 , 3 , 4 ,... exp t dt] max t0 {i } . (23) (24) As a criterion in tasks similar to the one in question, objective functional of maximization of the average per capita consumption of employee within the temporary interval is usually assumed [0, T]:
T C(t) 0 L1 (t) L2 (t)
exp( t)dt max where θ > 0 – discount factor that reflects the extent of giving preference to the future consumption over the current one.
Note that the criterion (24) is only a private (economic) criterion. Therefore, socioecological, innovation and other optimality criteria are also required integrally!
Control synthesis task in stochastic systems. Let us consider the optimal
management synthesis task in stochastic linear systems [
Phase state of the system means the vector x=(x1, x2, ..., xn), where xi, i=1, ..., n – aggregate of data describing the i-th sector of the system. Let us assume that all the sectors are provided with some management levers: u=(u1, u2, ..., un).
Each of the listed parameters, in its turn, represents a vector composed of the numeric values of different characteristics of the system dynamics. Let us assume that [t0, tk] – reviewed system development period. Let us designate as ξ the vector of some additional parameters determined by means of forecasting using statistical data of the system, or which are constants.
Consequently, the dependence is studied of each variable xi, i=1, ..., n from the managing variables ui of the system states and the vector of parameters ξ.
The linearized system model looks as follows: x( , t) A( )x( , t) B( )u( , t),
x( , t) R n, u( , t) Rm , A( ) R nm , B( ) Rnm ; (25) where A(ξ)=|Aij(ξ)|, B(ξ)=|Bij(ξ)| – matrices with parametric uncertainty; x(ξ, t)=[xi(ξ, t)] – system state vector; u(ξ, t)=[ui(ξ, t)] – management vector; ξ – vector of stochastic processes.
The task of optimal management synthesis for a stochastic dynamic system is posed
as follows: to find an optimal management law in the form of [
tk J (xT ( , t)x( , t) uT ( , t)Ru( , t))dt ( )d .
0
In a simple case, linear observation equation may be used in the following form:
y(t)=H(t)x(t)+η(t). In this equation, the observation H(t) is represented by a stochastic
observation matrix, which can be preset in practical terms, and η(t) is the “white noise”
type process, which can be preset based on statistical data. In doing so, two independent
tasks are to be resolved based on the separation principle [
In the early papers of the first author of this paper, the task of optimal evaluation
(filtration) under the conditions of multiplicative-additive mixtures was resolved using
the integral description of the filter [
However, the filtration task can also be conveniently resolved using the Kalman
filter for the linear case and the Stratonovich filter for the non-linear right part of the
dynamics equation [
Based on the use of state-of-the-art methods, models, information and innovation technologies in order to forecast the state of the non-linear dynamics of eco-economic and socio-humanitarian systems, integrated stochastic models of objects and processes were developed and studied, suitable for the conditions of systemic crises. The paper examines the aspects of integration of multiple business areas and sectors of the modern complex systems of SEEH type functioning and developing under the complex conditions of instability and crises. Complex formalization resulted in obtaining one of the options of the integral socio-eco-economic and innovative non-linear model of dynamics in the form of a system of differential and functional stochastic equations. The paper presents the task of forecasting the state of a complex system in the innovative economy on the basis of the integral model in a phased space with observation equations, development of optimal management filters and algorithms. The prospects of the further investigations include conducting computer experiments.
The paper deals with the problem of sustainable development and innovative integral modeling approach in the management of technogenic objects and processes as a system of socio-eco-economic and humanitarian type. Based on the use of information and innovation technologies in order to forecast the non-linear dynamics of eco-economic and socio-humanitarian systems, integrated stochastic models of objects and processes were developed and studied, suitable for the conditions of systemic crises. The paper handles the aspect of integration of 4 business and functioning areas of the modern complex systems. It proposes a general conceptual integrated model, generalized synergetic model of dynamics, considering different uncertainty (stochastic and chaotic components). Most of the previously created dynamics models of eco-economic and socio-humanitarian systems and processes functioning and developing under the complex conditions of non-linearity, instability and crises, have theoretical and deterministic nature and are rather problematic from the viewpoint of the availability of information and adequacy for their implementation. In this connection, the objective of TOP management conditions the objective necessity of improving methods, models and information technologies on the basis of stochastic equations for SEEH management.
Integral socio-eco-economic stochastic models of the dynamics of TOP systems, i.e. technogenic integrated systems functioning under the conditions of the current systemic crises, were developed and investigated.
Based on the use of state-of-the-art methods, models, information and innovation technologies in order to forecast the state of the non-linear dynamics of eco-economic and socio-humanitarian systems, integrated stochastic models of objects and processes were developed and studied, suitable for the conditions of systemic crises. The paper approaches the aspect of integration of multiple business areas and sectors of the modern complex systems of SEEH type functioning and developing under the complex conditions of instability and crises. Complex formalization resulted in obtaining one of the options of the integral socio-eco-economic and innovative nonlinear model of dynamics in the form of a system of differential and functional stochastic equations.
An integrated stochastic non-linear growth dynamics model was developed and studied to forecast the development of the state of an innovative economy, which is suitable for the conditions of risks and crises. The paper examines the aspects of integration of multiple business areas and sectors of the modern complex systems functioning and developing under the present conditions of instability. The prospects for the further investigations include representation of the proposed integral model in a phased space with observation equations, development of optimal management filters and algorithms.
The prospects of the further investigations in this area include conducting computer experiments and their wide practical use. The prospects also include development and investigation of models, criteria and methods of optimal management of technogenic objects and creation of decision-making systems based on the proposed integral model within the state space.