<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Prediction of Business Confidence Index Based on a System of Economic Indicators</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Vita Los</string-name>
          <email>vitalos.2704@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Dmytro Ocheretin</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Zaporizhzhia National University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>66, Zhukovskogo Str., Zaporizhzhia, 69600</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>237</fpage>
      <lpage>248</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>One of the important indicators that characterize the economy of the country is the business confidence index. It is the basis for tracking the cycles of economic dynamics and analysis of the country's business climate. Evaluation of this indicator makes it possible to predict the crisis phenomena that are occurring in the economy, and to develop possible ways out of difficult situations. On the example of the five countries (Ukraine, Germany, Hungary, Slovenia, Poland) it was also analyzed the possibility of constructing the business confidence index based on economic indicators, which characterize current economic activity of the country. For analysis, the quarterly values of economic indicators over the last years were taken. The selected economic indicators based on crosscorrelation analysis were ranked into three groups: coincident, lagging and leading indicators. Using coincident and leading economic indicators, the several regression models of the business confidence index were built. On the basis of the obtained regression models, the forecast of business confidence index value for the next period is evaluated and the trends of its development are established.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>business climate</kwd>
        <kwd>business confidence index</kwd>
        <kwd>cross-correlation analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>socio-economic indicators</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        The modern development of the domestic economy is characterized by deepening
international economic relations in connection with the intensification of European
integration processes. This is the reason for the new tasks that confront the national
economy and require solution and coordination with the world methodology of business
management. One such task is the assessment and analysis of the country’s business
climate. The indicator characterizing the business climate in European countries is the
index of business expectations, or as it is called the business confidence index (BCI)
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. The business confidence index is a special economic indicator that reflects the state
of the economy as a whole and in its individual sectors. This index is especially
important for macroeconomics, as it characterizes the efficiency of economic activity
and the prospects for the development of the country's economy as a whole. It is the
basis for making economically sensible decisions about the effectiveness of identifying
and using resources, and analyzes business cycles. This index is associated with the
concept of economic cycles, because the economy develops unevenly and in its
dynamics can be traced to the presence of certain cycles. So on its basis it is possible to
identify and predict the crisis phenomena that occur in the economy and to develop
possible ways out of a difficult situation [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        The purpose of this paper is to verify whether it is possible to use some of the
economic indicators for calculating the business confidence index. Based on the
selected methods we will try to confirm or reject the hypothesis which say that business
confidence index can be predicted on the base of coincident indicators. The
methodological basis for choosing economic indicators is the recommendations for
calculating the business expectations indicators set out in the Joint Harmonised EU
Programme of Business and Consumer Surveys, which contains the clear definition of
the list of business expectations indicators and the methodology for their calculation
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Confidence indicators reflect entrepreneurs' perceptions and expectations at the
sector level in the one-dimensional index. They are calculated as the simple arithmetic
average of the balances of answers (in percentage points) to selected questions [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]. The
respondents are asked to give their assessments of the current business situation and
their expectations for the next six or twelve months. The situation can be characterised
as “good”, “satisfactorily” or “poor”. The business expectations of the respondents for
the next period are characterised as “more favourable”, “unchanged” or “more
unfavourable”. The balance value of the current business situation is the difference of
the percentages of the responses "good" and "poor", the balance value of the
expectations is the difference of the responses "more favourable" and "more
unfavourable" percentages. The business confidence index is a mean of the balances of
the business situation and the expectations.
      </p>
      <p>Ukrainian business confidence index is calculated since 2006 and consists of five
averages of the balances in the industry, construction, retail and wholesale trade,
agriculture, transport and some others (Figure 1).</p>
      <p>Business expectations index
n
o
i
t
i
d
n
o
c
c
i
m
o
n
o
c
e
d
n
a
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
F
n
o
i
t
c
u
d
o
r
p
n
w
o
f
o
s
e
l
a
s
f
o
e
m
u
l
o
V
n
o
i
t
c
u
r
t
s
n
o
c
r
o
f
s
t
s
o
c
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
I
,
y
r
ien ry
ch to
rfaom iednnv
s n
t
so tan
tc e
tseevnm ieuqp</p>
      <p>
        m
n
I
s
r
e
k
r
o
w
f
o
t
n
u
o
m
A
Fig. 1. The balances of business confidence index in Ukraine.
According to the method of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development (OECD) composite confidence indicator (business confidence index) is
average of the industrial confidence indicator (ICI), construction confidence indicator
(CCI), retail trade confidence indicator (RCI) and confidence indicator for services
(SCI) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]. The industrial confidence indicator is an average of the balances to the
questions in the industry survey relating to future tendency of production, total order
books, stocks of finished goods. The construction confidence indicator is an average of
the balances to the questions in the construction relating to total order books and future
tendency of employment.
      </p>
      <p>The retail trade confidence indicator is an average of the balances to the questions
in the retail trade survey relating to present business situation, future tendency of the
business situation and stocks. The confidence indicator for services is an average of the
balances to the questions in the survey relating to the future tendency of employment,
present business situation, future tendency of business situation.
2</p>
      <p>
        Construction and Forecast of Business Confidence Index
Cross-correlation is a standard method of estimating the correlation degree of
sequences [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. The correlation coefficient r between the business confidence index (xi)
and economic indicator (yi) with time delay t, where i = 1, 2, ..., N is considered. Time
delay t and length of correlation series could be less than N, e.g., goal may be the
verification of correlation for the limited set of measurements. Coefficient r = 1 lies in
the range of -1 ≤ r ≤ 1 and the boundary values of this range point out to maximum
correlation. When r = 0, correlation is absent. For the case of correlation coefficient
equal to unity, there is a coincidence of the series and, accordingly, the maximum
degree of correlation. When correlation coefficient is close to the unity in absolute
value, but has a negative value, there is an inverse correlation, i.e., it is a contrary
relationship between two variables such that they move in opposite directions.
      </p>
      <p>
        In order to verify if a given economic indicator shown sufficient concurrence with
business confidence index and does not behave as e.g. leading or lagging indicator, we
will apply cross correlations for 12 periods forward and backwards. The first condition
for including economic indicators in the groups of leading, coincident or lagging
indicators is the highest absolute value of correlation coefficient must be at least 0.55
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. The second condition for including economic indicators contains the following:
1. coincident indicators have the highest absolute value of correlation coefficient in the
period of time t;
2. lagging indicators have the highest absolute value of correlation coefficient is on the
right side from t;
3. leading indicators have the highest absolute value of correlation coefficient is on the
left side from t.
      </p>
      <p>
        We have chosen the secondary data for our analysis, obtained from the National Bank
of Ukraine [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ], OECD [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ] and CESifo Group Munich [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ]. In all cases it was times
series with quarterly periodicity.
      </p>
      <p>To calculate the index of business expectations, we use the time series of economic
indicators that correspond to the components of the index of business expectations.
Based on the International System of Leading Indicators in the part of business
tendency survey for analysis the following indicators were chosen: producer prices
(index points), unemployment rate (% of labour force), Gross Domestic Product
(annual growth rate), new orders (index points). The indicators used for the countries
have been analyzed and time series are listed in Table 1.</p>
      <p>After the application of the selected methods, we got the result of cross correlations
for all selected economic indicators for each country. Based on the results, we are able
to assess, which indicators behave in line with the business confidence index and which
act with a delay or in advance as compared to the business confidence and expectations.</p>
      <p>Concerning Ukraine, we have the time series of the selected economic indicators and
analyzed their in relation to business confidence index through cross correlations. The
results of these correlations are compared in Table 2.</p>
      <p>The results of these correlations, with the range of 12 quarters forwards and
backwards show that only two economic indicators act with business confidence index
of Ukraine. The maximum value of cross correlation between producer prices and
business confidence index were achieved in the period of time t – 12 and there absolute
value were below 0.55 (0.2119). It means that this indicator does not show any
relationship with any Ukrainian business confidence expectations. The result of the
cross correlation between unemployment rate and business confidence index was
achieved in the period of time t – 1 and there absolute values were above 0.55 (0.721).
Consequently, unemployment rate is the leading indicator for business confidence
index of Ukraine. The Gross Domestic Product (annual growth rate) is coincident
indicator with business confidence index, because the highest absolute value of
correlation coefficient is in the period of time t and its meaning 0.8657. This economic
indicator is a reflection of the financial and economic state of the country and is very
important for the business community of each country.</p>
      <p>We have also assessed the relation between the business confidence index and
economic indicators of Germany. The results of these correlations are compared in
Table 3.</p>
      <p>Cross correlations between producer prices and business confidence index and
between unemployment rate and business confidence index do not show any
relationship insofar as there maximum absolute value were below 0.55 (0.4883 and
0.503 respectively).</p>
      <p>But, in the case of Germany we have found that 2 out of 4 tracked indicators report
the maximum values of cross correlations above the level of 0.75 showing strong
relationship of these indicators with the business confidence index. Such indicators are
Gross Domestic Product and new orders. These indicators are coincident with the
highest value of correlation coefficients in the period of time t (0.7685 and 0.907
respectively). We can recommend these indicators as an alternative to business
confidence index, when it comes to monitoring economic tendency of Germany.</p>
      <p>The next country for analysis is Hungary. The results of correlations for this country
are compared in Table 4.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Maximum absolute value of cross correlation 0.360 0.476</title>
      <p>0.6181</p>
      <p>Cross-correlation analysis revealed that three economic indicators do not affect the
business confidence index of Hungary. The absolute value correlations of these
economic indicators with business confidence index are below the threshold value of
0.55. They are equal 0.360, 0.476, 0.4297 for producer prices, unemployment rate and
new orders respectively. Only Gross Domestic Product is coincidental indicator with
business confidence index; maximum absolute value of cross correlation is equal
0.6181.</p>
      <p>We have also assessed the relation between the economic indicators and business
confidence index of Slovenia. The results of these correlations are compared in Table 5.</p>
      <p>Such economic indicators as producer price and unemployment rate are
characterized by lack of relations with business confidence index of Slovenia. There
maximum absolute value of cross correlations are 0.1644 and 0.415 respectively. The
Gross Domestic Product is leading indicator of business confidence index with a lead
of 1 quarter and maximum absolute value of cross correlation 0.8425.</p>
      <p>The last monitored economy is Poland. The results of correlations for this country
are compared in Table 6.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Maximum absolute value of cross correlation 0.4894 0.435</title>
      <p>0.8794</p>
      <p>Cross-correlation analysis revealed that two economic indicators do not affect the
business confidence index of Poland. Such indicators as producer prices and
unemployment rate have a maximum absolute value of cross correlation less than the
threshold value (0.4894 and 0.435 respectively). The maximum absolute value of cross
correlation between new orders and business confidence index is above the threshold
value (0.7012), but this indicator is lagging with period of time t + 1. Therefore, this
indicator is excluded from further consideration. The Gross Domestic Product is
coincident indicator with the business confidence index with high level of correlation
(0.8794).</p>
      <p>
        The next step of business confidence index analysis is the construction regression
model with coincident economic indicators and the forecast of the business confidence
index for the next period. In order to forecast economic indicators for the next value in
the next period of time it was used the single exponential smoothing with smoothing
parameter α [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
        ]. In this paper the smoothing parameter is α = 0.9.
      </p>
      <p>
        Investigate the applicability of linear and nonlinear (multiplicative) regression
models for forecast of the business confidence index. Linear regression models are
easiest to calibrate and are the most common. Some nonlinear regression models can
be transformed to a linear model by means of some transformation such as
logarithmization of dependent and independent variables. Predicted values can then be
converted to ordinary numbers by taking their antilog or exponential [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
        ]. Economic
indicators are represented by percentage changes or index values changes. But some
values of Gross Domestic Product (annual gross indicator) take negative values. Since
the logarithmic function for negative values is not defined, the use of multiplicative
models for forecast of the business confidence index is impossible. Therefore, for
further research we will use the linear regression model which allow use of absolute
and relative indicators that take both positive and negative values.
      </p>
      <p>For Ukraine time series of data consists of 47 quarterly values (1st quarter 2007 –
3rd quarter 2018). The regression model of business confidence index of Ukraine is
BCIUkraine  136,892  2, 729 URUkraine  1, 579  GDPUkraine ,
(1)
where BCIUkraine – business confidence index of Ukraine (index points);
URUkraine – Ukrainian unemployment rate (% of labour force);
GDPUkraine – Gross Domestic Product (annual growth rate) of Ukraine.</p>
      <p>The model is qualitative (R2 = 0.882) and statistically significant
(Fcal = 197.9 &gt; Ftable = 3.2 with 95% confidence that there is no significant difference
in precision). The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of predicted values is 1.4%.
Actual and predicted values of business confidence index of Ukraine is presented on
Figure 2.</p>
      <p>x 150
ed 140
n
i
ec 130
end 120
i
fno 110
ssc 100
isen 90
uB 80
70
1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3Q 2
7_002Q _0702Q 0_802Q 0_902Q 0_102Q 10_02Q 1_102Q _2102Q 1_302Q 13_02Q 4_102Q _1502Q 6_102Q 61_02Q 1_702 81_02Q</p>
      <p>Time</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Predicted business confidence index (Ukraine)</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Business confidence index (Ukraine)</title>
        <p>The forecast value of the business confidence index for the 4th quarter of 2018 is 119.5
and is in confidence interval [92.24; 146.77] with 95% confidence level. The forecast
confirms the continued growth of business activity level in the economy of Ukraine.</p>
        <p>For Germany time series of data consists of 56 quarterly values (the 1st quarter 2005
– the 4th quarter 2018). The regression model of business confidence index of Germany
is</p>
        <p>BCIGermany  57, 33  0, 69  GDPGermany  0, 41 NOGermany ,
(2)
where BCIGermany – business confidence index of Germany (index points);
GDPGermany – Gross Domestic Product (annual growth rate) of Germany;
NOGermany – new orders (index points) of Germany.</p>
        <p>The model is qualitative (R2 = 0.787) and statistically significant
(Fcal = 81.4 &gt; Ftable = 3.2 with 95% confidence that there is no significant difference in
precision). The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of predicted values is 5.2%.
Actual and predicted values of business confidence index of Germany are presented on
Figure 3.</p>
        <p>105
edx 100
ien 95
c 90
ifenond 8805
c
s
s
e
n
i
s
u
B</p>
        <sec id="sec-3-2-1">
          <title>Time</title>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>Predicted business confidence index (Germany)</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-4">
        <title>Business confidence index (Germany)</title>
        <p>The forecast value of the business confidence index for the 1st quarter of 2019 is 101.4
and is in confidence interval [91.41; 111.41] with 95% confidence level. The forecast
confirms the continuation of the fall in the level of business activity in the economy of
Germany.</p>
        <p>For the next country – Hungary – time series of data consists of 72 quarterly values
(1st quarter 2001 – 4th quarter 2018).The regression model of business confidence
index of Hungary is</p>
        <p>BCI Hungary  99,19  0, 31 GDPHungary ,
(3)
where BCIHungary – business confidence index of Hungary (index points);</p>
        <p>GDPHungary – Gross Domestic Product (annual growth rate) of Hungary.
For the constructed model, the approximation accuracy is insufficient (R2 = 0.382) and
the model requires improvement. Actual values of business confidence index of
Hungary are presented on Figure 4.</p>
        <p>For the construction of the index of business expectations in Hungary required an
additional analysis of indicators, that affect the expectations of the business
environment.</p>
        <p>For Slovenia time series of data consists of 76 quarterly values (1st quarter 2000 –
4th quarter 2018). The regression model of business confidence index of Slovenia is
104
edx 110023
iiifssceecendnnon 1100999999875601
su 94
B</p>
        <p>104
ex 102
d
iifsseececonnnnd 199900864
i
su 92
B</p>
        <p>Time</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-5">
        <title>Business con fidence index (Hungary)</title>
        <p>The model is qualitative (R2 = 0.701) and statistically significant
(Fcal = 173.4 &gt; Ftable = 3.97 with 95% confidence that there is no significant difference
in precision). The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of predicted values is 0.9%.
Actual and predicted values of business confidence index of Slovenia presented on
Figure 5.</p>
        <p>BCISlovenia  99,123  0, 474  GDPSlovenia ,
where BCISlovenia – business confidence index of Slovenia (index points);
GDPSlovenia – Gross Domestic Product (annual growth rate) of Slovenia.
(4)</p>
        <p>Time</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-6">
        <title>Businessconfidence index(Slovenia)</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-7">
        <title>Predicted business confidence index (Slovenia)</title>
        <p>The forecast value of the business confidence index for the 1st quarter of 2019 is 101.1
and is in confidence interval [97.78; 104.43] with 95% confidence level. The forecast
confirms the continuation of the fall in the level of business activity in the economy of
Slovenia.</p>
        <p>For Poland time series of data consists of 52 quarterly values (the 1st quarter 2006 –
the 4th quarter 2018).The regression model of business confidence index of Poland is
BCIPoland  98, 283  0, 486  GDPPoland ,
(5)
where BCIPoland – business confidence index of Poland (index points);
GDPPoland – Gross Domestic Product (annual growth rate) of Poland.</p>
        <p>The model is qualitative (R2 = 0.773) and statistically significant
(Fcal = 170.7 &gt; Ftable = 4.03 with 95% confidence that there is no significant difference
in precision). The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of predicted values is
0.38%. Actual and predicted values of business confidence index of Poland are
presented on Figure 6.</p>
        <p>103
x 102
e
ind 101
ce 100
iedn 99
fon 98
ssc 97
e
n
i
su
B
1Q 4Q 3Q 2Q 1Q 4Q 3Q 2Q 1Q 4Q 3Q 2Q 1Q 4Q 3Q 2Q 1Q 4Q
_6002 _6002 _7002 8_002 9_002 9_002 _0012 _1012 T2_012ime _2021 3_012 4_012 _5012 _5012 6_120 7_120 _8120 _8120</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-8">
        <title>Businessconfidence index(Poland) Predicted business confidence index (Poland)</title>
        <p>The forecast value of the business confidence index for the 1st quarter of 2019 is 100.7
and is in confidence interval [98.88; 102.48] with 95% confidence level. The forecast
confirms the continuation of the fall in the level of business activity in the economy of
Poland.
3</p>
        <p>Conclusions
As mentioned above, generalized business confidence index is determined on the basis
of the survey of respondents in a country regarding their business expectations. This
assessment process is quite costly and problematic, as business entities may be more
optimistic in their expectations during the survey. This, in turn, will lead to inaccurate
information. Thus, the existing approach of determining the business confidence index
is imperfect and requires clarification by formalizing the evaluation process. It can be
carried out by means of the selection and justification of quantitative socio-economic
indicators, on the basis of which the business confidence index will be determined. One
more important condition is that the indicators belong to the group of leading, which
would allow to establish and recognize crisis phenomena in the economy.</p>
        <p>Finally, the business confidence index was improved, based on a system of
socioeconomic factors. The absolute value of correlation coefficient the indicators with the
business confidence index must be the high. Also the indicators were grouped into three
groups, and indicators that belonged to the group of coincident and the group of leading
were chosen for estimation and forecasting.</p>
        <p>The result of prediction of the business confidence index of Ukraine in the 4th
quarter of 2018 will be equal to 119.5 and will increase by 1.97% from the 3rd quarter
of 2018. This confirms the continuing optimism of respondents in Ukraine.</p>
        <p>Predicted results for Germany, Slovenia an Poland show that the business confidence
index for these countries in the 1th quarter of 2019 will be decrease from the 4th quarter
of 2018 by 0.57, 0.43 and 0.64 percent respectively. This is due to the uncertainty of
business expectations in these countries.</p>
        <p>For the prediction of the index of business expectations in Hungary the additional
analysis is required. The results of cross-correlation and regression analyzes showed
that Gross Domestic Product (annual growth rate) is not the main factor that influences
business expectations in this country.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gagea</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Confidence indicators analysis in the context of Romanian and European economy</article-title>
          .
          <source>Procedia Soc Behav Sci</source>
          .
          <volume>62</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>393</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>397</lpage>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pronoza</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Theory and practice of early recognition of crisis processes in economy</article-title>
          .
          <source>Innovatsiina ekonomika</source>
          .
          <volume>51</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>198</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>209</lpage>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>European</given-names>
            <surname>Commission</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>The Joint Harmonised EU Programme of Business and Consumer Surveys: User Guide</article-title>
          . http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/db_indicators/surveys/documents/bcs_user_guide_en .pdf (
          <year>2016</year>
          ).
          <source>Accessed 21 Mar 2019</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4. CESifo Group Munich:
          <article-title>Calculating the ifo Business Climate</article-title>
          . http://www.cesifogroup.de/w/45YCTv5Bp (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <source>Accessed 18 Feb 2019</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5. OECD:
          <article-title>Business Tendency Surveys: A Handbook</article-title>
          . http://www.oecd.org/sdd/leadingindicators/31837055.pdf (
          <year>2003</year>
          ).
          <source>Accessed 21 Mar 2019</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bourke</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P</given-names>
          </string-name>
          : Cross Correlation. http://paulbourke.net/miscellaneous/correlate (
          <year>1996</year>
          ).
          <source>Accessed 20 Feb 2019</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bilan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Gavurova,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Gedek</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Tkacova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>A.</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>The Composite Coincident Indicator (CCI) for business cycles</article-title>
          .
          <source>Acta Polytechnica Hungarica</source>
          .
          <volume>7</volume>
          (
          <issue>14</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>71</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>90</lpage>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
          <source>doi:10.12700/APH.14.7</source>
          .
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <volume>7</volume>
          .
          <fpage>5</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <article-title>National bank of Ukraine: Business expectations of enterprises</article-title>
          . https://bank.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/ category?cat_id=
          <volume>58374</volume>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <source>Accessed 18 Feb 2019</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>OECD</given-names>
            <surname>Data</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>: Leading indicators - Business Confidence Index (BCI). https://data.oecd.org/leadind/ business-confidence-index-bci</article-title>
          .
          <source>htm</source>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <source>Accessed 18 Feb 2019</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10. CESifo Group Munich:
          <article-title>Long time-series for the ifo Business Climate</article-title>
          . http://www.cesifogroup.de/w/AABWVtCn (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <source>Accessed 18 Feb 2019</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tradingeconomics</surname>
          </string-name>
          .com: Producer prices. https://tradingeconomics.com/countrylist/producer-prices (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <source>Accessed 18 Feb 2019</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <article-title>Unemployment - Unemployment rate</article-title>
          .
          <source>OECD Data</source>
          . https://data.oecd.org/unemp/unemployment-rate.
          <source>htm</source>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <source>Accessed 18 Feb 2019</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tradingeconomics</surname>
          </string-name>
          .com: Ukraine Unemployment Rate. https://tradingeconomics.com/ukraine/ unemployment-rate (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <source>Accessed 18 Feb 2019</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tradingeconomics</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>com: GDP annual growth rate</article-title>
          . https://tradingeconomics.com/countrylist/gdp
          <article-title>-annual-growth-rate (</article-title>
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <source>Accessed 18 Feb 2019</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tradingeconomics</surname>
          </string-name>
          .com: New orders. https://tradingeconomics.com/country-list/new-orders (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <source>Accessed 18 Feb 2019</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hyndman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Athanasopoulos</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G.:
          <article-title>Forecasting: principles and practice</article-title>
          .
          <source>OTexts</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Melbourne</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          17.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gloudemans</surname>
          </string-name>
          , R.J.:
          <article-title>Comparison of three residential regression models: Additive, multiplicative, and nonlinear</article-title>
          .
          <source>Assessment Journal: 9</source>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>25</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>36</lpage>
          (
          <year>2002</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          18.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Los</surname>
          </string-name>
          , V.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ocheretin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Construction of business confidence index based on a system of economic indicators</article-title>
          .
          <source>SHS Web of Conferences</source>
          .
          <volume>65</volume>
          ,
          <issue>06003</issue>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1051/shsconf/20196506003
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>