<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>1https://www.journalism.org/2017/09/07/news</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Exploring Relevance in Microblog Search (Extended Abstract)</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Divi Galih Prasetyo Putri</string-name>
          <email>d.putri@campus.unimib.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Gabriella Pasi</string-name>
          <email>gabriella.pasi@unimib.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>University of Milano-Bicocca</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Milan</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2017</year>
      </pub-date>
      <abstract>
        <p>Microblog search has some important diferences with respect to Web search, both in objectives and intents, and in the format and content of microblogs, e.g tweets. Properties such as credibility, informativeness and interestingness of microblogs could be considered as relevance dimensions to be assessed during query processing. In this paper we propose an approach aimed to investigate the association of diferent relevance dimensions with distinct search tasks in Microblog search. We hypothesize that the importance of a relevance dimension can be diferent, depending on the considered task. The preliminary results shows that the consideration of diferent relevance dimensions has a diferent impact on diferent search task.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>CCS CONCEPTS</title>
      <p>• Information systems → Evaluation of retrieval results;
Relevance assessment; Web and social media search.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>INTRODUCTION</title>
      <p>
        Nowadays, more and more people rely on social media to freely
express their opinions and to gather information relevant to their
needs. Based on the report from the Pew Research Center, more than
half of US adults use social media to fulfill their information needs
1; for example, users who consume news using Twitter grew up to
15% between 2016 to 2017. In [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ], the authors argue that search in
Microblogs such as Twitter is diferent from Web search, specifically
regarding the users’ search behaviour and intents. In information
retrieval, not all topically-related information are relevant to the
users’ information need expressed in a query. The concept of
multidimensional relevance is widely used in the context of Web search,
which implies that several relevance dimensions should be
considered to assess the utility of an information item to a user query.
In [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], the authors conclude that interestingness is an important
relevance dimension in Microblog search; they also outline that
users consider less interesting the personal tweets generated from
social interactions between users. Other research contributions
employed diferent quality indicators of User-Generated Content,
2
Microblog search is mainly based on topicality to estimate relevance;
however, several studies introduce more relevance dimensions that
indicate the quality of microblogs to provide users with more useful
information. They include informativeness, interestingness,
credibility, and opinionatedness. The relation between relevance and
informativeness has been studied in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ], where the authors employ
human annotations to assess whether a microblog is relevant or
not, and if it is informative or not. The reported results show that
informativeness and relevance are correlated. Interestingness can
also be a signal of the quality of microblogs, as outlined in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. In
this study, an interestingness score is computed by exploiting
several Microblog features including the probability of a tweet of being
retweeted. Another quality indicator of UGC that has been
considered in previous research is credibility [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. The authors adopt a state
of the art approach to assess the credibility of a blog post. Another
interesting relevance criterion is opiniontedness, which constitutes
a relevance dimension related to the opinion retrieval task [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3 ref4 ref5">3–5</xref>
        ]. In
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ], the authors have defined lexicon-based approaches to estimate
the opinionatedness of microblogs. While in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] the authors
considered the topic and the stylistic variation of the tweet in the opinion
retrieval task. Most of these works do not consider the relation
between search task and relevance dimensions in their retrieval
systems. They compare the obtained search results with
topicality assessment as a baseline (e.g BM25), and it is not clear which
combination of relevance dimensions can achieve better retrieval
results. The aim of our research is to study the correlation between
relevance dimensions and search tasks.
3
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>PROPOSED METHOD</title>
      <p>The hypothesis at the basis of the research shortly reported in this
paper is that distinct search tasks can be related to the assessment of
distinct relevance dimensions. To tackle this issue, an incremental
approach is adopted. Topicality is assumed to be the basic relevance
criterion for all considered tasks; the topical relevance of each
document is assessed by using a standard retrieval model, namely
the query likelihood model, and it is used as the baseline.
Relevance Dimensions
We consider four additional relevance dimensions namely
credibility, informativeness, opinionatedness, interestingness. In this
preliminary study, for each of the considered tasks, we combine
each of the additional relevance dimensions with topicality only,
to get the final Retrieval Status Value (RSV) of a document; in the
future we aim to consider and combine more relevance dimensions.
To combine the relevance scores associated with the two considered
dimensions (topicality plus one of the four above mentioned
dimensions), we use a linear combination RSV = αRSVt + (1 − α )RSVi ,
where RSVt is the topicality score, RSVi is the score assessed for the
additional relevance dimension, and α denotes a weight between 0
and 1. As it has been done in the literature, we compare the overall
RSV with the topicality score only as a baseline, to see the impact
of the additional dimension to the retrieval result.
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>EXPERIMENTS AND RESULTS</title>
      <p>
        For the experiments we have used diferent data collections for
diferent search tasks. We utilize the data collection from the First
International Workshop on Exploitation of Social Media for
Emergency Relief and Preparedness (SMERP) 2017 3 for the
disasterrelated retrieval task, and the data proposed by [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ] for the opinion
retrieval task. The disaster-related dataset contains five topics and
the opinion retrieval dataset consists of 50 topics. We adopt the
approach of [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ] to calculate the informativeness score, based on
logistic regression; we use the predicted probability as the
informativeness value of a tweet. The opinionatedness score is obtained
by using the approach proposed in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]. The opinionatedness score
is calculated not only based on term-based opinion score but also
based on the topic and the stylistic variations of tweets. We build
the proposed ranking system based on Apache Lucene4. In this
experiment, we use MAP to compute the performance of the
retrieval system. We report here the results related to two search
tasks, namely the Disaster-related retrieval task and the Opinion
retrieval task. Fig.1 shows the results of the experiment for each of
the two considered tasks by comparing MAP values of the system
combining two relevance dimensions with the system based on
topicality (the baseline). The y-axis shows the MAP score and the
x-axis represents the weight of the topicality score in the linear
combination (RSVt ). Fig. 1 illustrates how the retrieval results change
according to the weight of the topicality dimension. The upper part
of Figure 1 shows the behavior of the system using informativeness
as an additional relevance dimension in the disaster-related task.
The bottom part of Figure 1 shows the behavior of the system in
the opinion retrieval task; it can be seen that opinionatedness can
improve the results of the retrieval system with increasing weights
of topicality in the linear combination.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>CONCLUSIONS</title>
      <p>In this work, we study the correlation between multidimensional
relevance criteria and search tasks in Microblog search. Besides
topicality we aim to use four additional relevance dimensions and
we consider three search tasks. In future, we plan to implement all
relevance dimensions and to evaluate the system using more data
collections related to diferent search task. We also intend to study
and model the interactions between relevance dimensions.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Arifah</given-names>
            <surname>Che</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alhadi</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Thomas Gottron, Jérôme Kunegis, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Nasir</given-names>
            <surname>Naveed</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2011</year>
          .
          <article-title>LiveTweet: Microblog Retrieval Based on Interestingness and an Adaptation of the Vector Space Model.</article-title>
          .
          <source>In TREC.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Jaeho</given-names>
            <surname>Choi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W Bruce</given-names>
            <surname>Croft</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and Jin Young Kim.
          <year>2012</year>
          .
          <article-title>Quality models for microblog retrieval</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM</source>
          ,
          <year>1834</year>
          -
          <fpage>1838</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Anastasia</given-names>
            <surname>Giachanou</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Morgan Harvey, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Fabio</given-names>
            <surname>Crestani</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Topic-specific stylistic variations for opinion retrieval on twitter</article-title>
          .
          <source>In European Conference on Information Retrieval</source>
          . Springer,
          <fpage>466</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>478</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Zhunchen</given-names>
            <surname>Luo</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Miles Osborne, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Ting</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <article-title>An efective approach to tweets opinion retrieval</article-title>
          .
          <source>World Wide Web 18</source>
          ,
          <issue>3</issue>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          ),
          <fpage>545</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>566</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Zhunchen</given-names>
            <surname>Luo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Jintao</given-names>
            <surname>Tang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Ting</given-names>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2013</year>
          .
          <article-title>Propagated opinion retrieval in twitter</article-title>
          .
          <source>In International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering</source>
          . Springer,
          <fpage>16</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>28</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Debanjan</given-names>
            <surname>Mahata</surname>
          </string-name>
          , John R Talburt, and Vivek Kumar Singh.
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <article-title>From chirps to whistles: discovering event-specific informative content from Twitter</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the ACM web science conference. ACM</source>
          ,
          <volume>17</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Kamran</given-names>
            <surname>Massoudi</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Manos Tsagkias, Maarten De Rijke, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Wouter</given-names>
            <surname>Weerkamp</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2011</year>
          .
          <article-title>Incorporating query expansion and quality indicators in searching microblog posts</article-title>
          .
          <source>In European Conference on Information Retrieval</source>
          . Springer,
          <fpage>362</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>367</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Jaime</given-names>
            <surname>Teevan</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Daniel Ramage, and Merredith Ringel Morris.
          <year>2011</year>
          . #
          <article-title>TwitterSearch: a comparison of microblog search and web search</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. ACM</source>
          ,
          <volume>35</volume>
          -
          <fpage>44</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>