=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-2456/paper29
|storemode=property
|title=Saffron: A Data Value Assessment Tool for Quantifying the Value of Data Assets
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2456/paper29.pdf
|volume=Vol-2456
|authors=Judie Attard,Jeremy Debattista,Rob Brennan
|dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/semweb/AttardDB19
}}
==Saffron: A Data Value Assessment Tool for Quantifying the Value of Data Assets==
https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2456/paper29.pdf
Saffron: A Data Value Assessment Tool
for Quantifying the Value of Data Assets ? ??
Judie Attard1[0000−0001−7507−1864] , Jeremy Debattista2[0000−0002−5592−8936] ,
and Rob Brennan3[0000−0001−8236−362X]
1
ADAPT Centre, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
judie.attard@adaptcentre.ie
2
School of Computer Science and Statistics, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
debattij@scss.tcd.ie
3
ADAPT Centre, School of Computing, Dublin City University, Ireland
rob.brennan@dcu.ie
Abstract. Data has become an indispensable commodity and it is the
basis for many products and services. It has become increasingly impor-
tant to understand the value of this data in order to be able to exploit it
and reap the full benefits. Yet, many businesses and entities are simply
hoarding data without understanding its true potential. We here present
Saffron; a Data Value Assessment Tool that enables the quantification of
the value of data assets based on a number of different data value dimen-
sions. Based on the Data Value Vocabulary (DaVe), Saffron enables the
extensible representation of the calculated value of data assets, whilst
also catering for the subjective and contextual nature of data value. The
tool exploits semantic technologies in order to provide traceable expla-
nations of the calculated data value. Saffron therefore provides the first
step towards the efficient and effective exploitation of data assets.
Keywords: Data value · Data governance · Data value monitoring ·
Data value assessment · Linked Data · Explainability.
1 Introduction
“Data is the new oil” is a claim supported by many. Even though there are many
things that differ between data and oil as a resource, such as their renewability
and their effect on the environment, one cannot deny the similarities in their
usage and utility potential, as well as in their nature of being indispensable
commodities in today’s society. We are increasingly relying on data or data-
based products and services, particularly in recent times, when the use of big
?
This research has received funding from the ADAPT Centre for Digital Con-
tent Technology, funded under the SFI Research Centres Programme (Grant
13/RC/2106), co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund and the Eu-
ropean Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie
Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 713567.
??
Copyright c 2019 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Com-
mons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
2 J. Attard et al.
data is ever so prevalent, and successful decision-making requires the effective
contextual exploitation of information.
Whether one agrees with the above-mentioned claim or not, it is undeniable
that data is, to different extents, valuable. But what is exactly meant by data
value? Numerous publications in literature explore this term in various domains.
Whilst the existing definitions of value might be somewhat similar, there is
currently no consensus on the definition of “data value”, or on its representation.
Moreover, it is inherently challenging to measure the value of data due to the
subjective and contextual nature of value. In fact, to the extent of our knowledge,
there currently exists no tool or framework that quantifies the value of data
based on various data value dimensions (aspects that characterise data value, e.g.
quality, cost, usage). In literature there are some approaches towards measuring
one or two of these dimensions, such as [2–4], however these cannot be deemed
as appropriate solutions to quantify data value since they do not cater for the
highly heterogeneous nature of data value. While it is evident that the use of data
has become a vital part of our everyday lives, only few are able to understand
the usefulness of measuring of the value of data. In fact, many businesses are
hoarding data without actually exploiting it or understanding its potential.
In order to target the niche in the topic of data value, our goal in this paper
is to tackle the quantification of data value. This quantification is essential to the
efficient and effective exploitation of data. We therefore propose our Data Value
Assessment Tool Saffron; a customisable semantic-based tool that considers a
number of data value dimensions to provide a comprehensive and context-aware
data value quantification. Saffron connects to data governance centres to extract
relevant metadata, uplifts it to a data value knowledge graph, and presents
analysis and semantic driven traceable explanations of the calculated data value.
2 Saffron: The Data Value Assessment Tool
Our motivation for Saffron is to enable the optimisation of data value chains
based on the quantification of data value. The tool therefore provides the ca-
pability of monitoring data assets as used within an enterprise, and uses the
relevant metadata to calculate the value of the assets. Considering the lack of
consensus on what characterises data value, we here designed Saffron to be ex-
tendible, and to calculate data value based on a number of different data value
dimensions and the relevant metric groups and metrics as defined in [1]. We also
take into consideration insight and feedback given by relevant stakeholders.
Figure 1 shows a diagram of the architecture of the Saffron tool. The latter
enables its users to connect to one or more data governance centres through
APIs. These centres include any methods used by an entity to manage their data,
and the relevant metadata. Saffron is therefore able to extract the metadata on
data assets as required.
In the Semantic Data Management component, Saffron uses the Data Value
Vocabulary4 (DaVe) to construct a knowledge graph containing information such
4
http://theme-e.adaptcentre.ie/dave/
Saffron: A Data Value Assessment Tool 3
Fig. 1. Architecture of Saffron: The Data Value Assessment Tool
as the name of the data asset, its description, and other metadata required to
calculate the implemented metrics. We refer to the latter as data asset readings.
As a proof of concept, we here implemented four different dimensions to
characterise data value, namely Infrastructure, Usage, Data, and Quality. For
each of these dimensions we implemented a number of metrics, totalling to eight
metrics over the four dimensions. Table 1 provides an overview based on the
hierarchy used in the DaVe vocabulary. Each of these metrics require one or
more data asset readings. For example for the Created By metric we require the
ID of the person who created the data asset. These readings are then used within
the respective formulas of each metric to calculate the metric value. These results
are added to the data asset knowledge graph and persisted to a triple store.
Table 1. Implemented Dimensions, Metric Groups, and Metrics
Dimension Metric Group Metric
Created By
User
Class of User
Usage
Last Modification Date
Data
Created On
Completeness
Quality Intrinsic
Accuracy
Data Extrinsic Trust
Infrastructure Data Data Management
For the quantification of the data value of data asset, we take into consid-
eration the metric values calculated as described above, as well as any Metric
Settings and Dimension Weights specified by the user through the Saffron Dash-
board. The metric settings are ‘assumptions’ required to cater for the subjective
nature of data value. For example, one might consider an older data asset to be
more valuable, but the opposite might also stand true. Therefore these settings
are used in order to tailor the overall data value calculation according to the
specific use context. Similarly, the dimension weights are used to cater for the
contextual nature of data value, where one dimension might be considered to be
relevant in one context, but less in another. For example, the usage dimension
4 J. Attard et al.
would be considered less important than the quality dimension (particularly a
timeliness metric) for weather forecast data. It is important to note that the met-
ric calculations are not affected with the dimensions weights, and are therefore
objective.
Through the Saffron Dashboard the user is able to access a number of interac-
tive visualisations, including: (1) The overall data value of a project (consisting
of a number of data assets); (2) The data value for specific assets, including a
breakdown of the dimension values; (3) The metric values for specific assets; (4)
The historic metric values for specific assets as they changed over time; and (5)
The project dimensions weights’ current settings.
In the Saffron Dashboard the user is also able to view an explanation of
how the data value was calculated. This explanation is generated within the
Semantic Data Management component, where asserted knowledge about the
data asset (from the knowledge graph) and the user set weights are coupled with
the terminology concepts about data value as defined in the DaVe vocabulary.
This enables us to present the user with a concise explanation of why and how
Saffron provided the given result as the data value of a data asset.
3 Conclusion
In this paper we presented the Saffron: Data Value Assessment Tool; the first
tool that enables users to quantify the value of their data assets based on a
number of dimensions. The tool is extendible and caters for the subjectivity and
context dependence of data valuation through the use of weights and settings.
Whilst still a proof of concept with a limited amount of implemented dimen-
sions and metrics, the Saffron tool is already being validated and evaluated with
stakeholders. Saffron is a concrete step towards quantifying the value of data
assets and enabling their effective and efficient exploitation.
References
1. Attard., J., Brennan., R.: A semantic data value vocabulary supporting data value
assessment and measurement integration. In: Proceedings of the 20th International
Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS,. pp. 133–144.
INSTICC, SciTePress (2018)
2. Klann, J.G., Schadow, G.: Modeling the Information-value Decay of Medical Prob-
lems for Problem List Maintenance. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International
Health Informatics Symposium. pp. 371–375. IHI ’10, ACM, New York, NY, USA
(2010)
3. al Saffar, S., Heileman, G.L.: Semantic Impact Graphs for Information Valuation.
In: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. pp.
209–212. DocEng ’08, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2008), event-place: Sao Paulo,
Brazil
4. Ying, Chen: Information Valuation for Information Lifecycle Management. In: Sec-
ond International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC’05). pp. 135–146
(Jun 2005)