<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Weekend in rome: a cognitive training exercise based on planning</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2019</year>
      </pub-date>
      <abstract>
        <p>-We present the design of a novel cognitive rehabilitation problems [2]. Recently, the use of computerized tools for tehxeerMcisSe-Rfeohratbhesyrestheambi.liItnattihoins eoxfeerxceisceu,ttivhee fpuantcietinotnhsatsotiontpelgarnataetiwntoo- cognitive training in MS has been increasing, as opposed to the day vacation in Rome by reserving the trains and hotel, and planning traditional pen-and-paper approach (see for example [3], [4]). the itinerary in the city while taking into consideration a number of The aim of this paper is to present the design of a constraints, mirroring the kind of limitations one would have to plan novel cognitive rehabilitation exercise for the rehabilitation of faourt oinmraetaeldlifepl(asnunchinags otopencoinngsthaonutrlys agnednbeurastsechneedwulesp)r.oWbleemexsplobiyt executive functions to integrate into MS-Rehab, an advanced combining randomly the different tasks to be carried out and to give system able to integrate the various phases of the MS hints to the users during rehabilitation. The exercise was carefully cognitive rehabilitation process [5]. designed to be as realistic as possible, thus having a high ecological Executive function is an umbrella term used to denote the lviafeli.dity and to maximize the positive impact on the patients quality of set of higher-order processes widely accepted as fundamental Index Terms-multiple sclerosis, cognitive rehabilitation, executive components of human cognition; indeed, studies have shown functions, planning, brain games that executive function deficits may lead to social and behavioral problems. Planning is one of the main skills related to executive functions, and a requirement of many cognitive I. INTRODUCTION and motor tasks. Specifically, it may be defined as the ability to organize cognitive behaviour in time and space and is necessary in situations where a goal must be achieved through a series of intermediate steps each of which does not necessarily lead directly towards that goal. The ability to plan is precisely the skill that the exercise we have developed, named Weekend in Rome, aims to train. The scenario which is simulated is different from any other present in rehabilitation software and had to be designed from scratch, involving a number of meetings with psychologists and rehabilitation experts to ensure its clinical validity. In this exercise, the patient has to plan a two-day vacation in the italian capital. In addition to making train and hotel reservations, he is also given a list of tasks (such as locations to visit or events to attend) he must accomplish, navigating all the difficulties which are typical of planning a trip in real life (reservations, bus schedules, opening hours...). Indeed, the exercise was carefully designed to be as realistic as possible, thus having a high ecological validity and to maximize the positive impact on the patients quality of life. The exercise was built using automated planning, a branch of artificial intelligence related to decision theory, which involves devising a plan, described as a sequence of actions, in order to achieve a given goal. Like all the other exercises of the MS-Rehab system, Weekend in Rome incorporates different auto-adaptive levels of difficulty.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common disease
of the central nervous system, affecting about 2 1/2 million
people worldwide. Specifically, it is an inflammatory
demyelinating disease: this means it is caused by damage to
the myelin, a lipid-rich substance that surrounds the axon of
some nerve cells, and allows a nerve to transmit its impulses
rapidly. Thus, the loss of myelin in MS is accompanied by a
disruption in the ability of the nerves to conduct electrical
impulses to and from the brain. This produces the various
symptoms of MS, which vary widely and include deficits in
movement, sensation, visual and bodily functions. In
particular, researchers indicate that 43 to 70% of patients are
cognitively impaired [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. Cognitive dysfunction could appear in
the earliest stages of the disease as the first symptoms of MS.
The cognitive domains impaired in MS seem to have an
interpatient variability, but a characteristic pattern may be defined:
memory, information processing efficiency, executive
functioning, attention, processing speed, are the most
commonly compromised functions. Cognitive rehabilitation
therapy, exercise, and education programs are promising
psychosocial interventions to improve coping and lessen
cognitive symptoms. Specifically, cognitive rehabilitation
therapy is a term used to describe treatments that address
these cognitive
SAT19: 1st Workshop on Socio-Affective Technologies: an interdisciplinary
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>II. EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS AND AUTOMATED PLANNING</title>
      <p>The term executive function covers a wide range of
concepts: most researchers, in fact, agree that it is an
exceptionally broad term, and there is little consensus on a
precise definition. Nevertheless, it is indisputable that the
term refers to abilities which are critical for functioning in
everyday life: for example, executive functions help you
manage life tasks such as planning a trip, your day, a research
project or even something as basic as preparing a meal.
Metaphorically speaking, executive functions could be
considered the brains chief executive officer, the conductor of
all cognitive skills. In fact, some abilities encompassed in
executive functioning involve other cognitive domains as well,
such as memory and attention. These abilities include the
maintenance and manipulation of information, temporal
organization, set shifting, self-monitoring, concept formation,
verbal fluency, inhibition, motivation, organization, and
planning. Widely accepted as fundamental components of
human cognition, studies have shown that executive function
deficits may lead to social and behavioral problems, as well as
academic underachievement [6]: people who have difficulty
inhibiting themselves, remembering things, planning, problem
solving, and being flexible will present major deficiencies in
social, academic, and vocational functioning. Executive
functions gradually develop and change across the lifespan of
an individual and can be improved at any time over the course
of a persons life [7]. Here we concentrate on planning
capabilities. Specifically, planning may be defined as the ability
to organize cognitive behaviour in time and space and is
necessary in situations where a goal must be achieved through
a series of intermediate steps, each of which does not
necessarily lead directly towards the specified goal [8]. Simply
put, planning is the ability to think about the future and
mentally anticipate the right way to carry-out a task: this
means to choose the necessary actions to reach a specific goal,
decide the right order, assign each task to the proper cognitive
resources, and establish a plan of action. In order to plan
efficiently, one needs the necessary information and the
ability to mentally establish an adequate synthesis of all the
data.</p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>A. Rehabilitation of Planning Abilities</title>
        <p>
          The ability to plan depends on elements like brain plasticity
or neuroplasticity, myelinization, or the ability to establish new
paths and synaptic connections. An absence or deficiency in
this ability is a typical symptom of frontal lobe disorders,
especially disorders that affect the prefrontal dorsolateral
area. Any task that requires planning, organization,
memorization, time management, and flexible thinking will be
particularly challenging for subjects who have deficient
planning abilities. Having significant difficulties in carrying out
these kind of tasks is known as dysexecutive syndrome (DES)
[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
          ]. In everyday life, this means that a persons ability to care
for himself, complete tasks, keep appointments and interact
with people appropriately may be compromised. Without
treatment, this may have devastating long-term effects on the
ability to succeed at home, work or school.
        </p>
        <p>
          Cognitive rehabilitation therapy (CRT) is a broad term used
to describe treatments that address these cognitive problems.
The Institute of Medicines 2011 [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
          ] report defines CRT as
cognitive rehabilitation attempts to enhance functioning and
independence in patients with cognitive impairments as a
result of brain damage or disease.
        </p>
        <p>
          We give a few example of cognitive exercises designed to
test, restore or strengthen underlying cognitive functions, in
particular planning, with a high ecological validity. Exercises
with a high ecological validity are exercises which train the
patient on typical tasks required in day-to-day life, thus giving
rehabilitation a positive impact on the patients quality of life.
• Zoo Map: In 1996, Wilson, Alderman, Burgess, Emslie,
and Evans developed the Behavioral Assessment of the
Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS), an ecologically valid test
battery designed specifically for the assessment of
planning and organizational capacity for situations one
could encounter in everyday life. Up until then,
conventional executive function tests lacked ecological
validity, resulting in a discrepancy between test
performance and functioning in everyday life [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
          ]. The
entire battery contains six subtests, including the Zoo
Map Test, where the participants are instructed to plan
their route through a map of the zoo, visiting a selection
of locations while actively disregarding others and
obeying certain rules: for example, the order of the
locations to visit, or crossing certain paths only once. This
test is particularly useful to assess the specific executive
deficit in order to carry out the appropriate rehabilitation
therapy.
• Plan-A-Day: Another similar exercise is Plan-A-Day [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
          ],
[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
          ], proposed by Funke &amp; Kruger in 1995. In this
exercise, the patient has to schedule a list of tasks to
complete during the day (for example, picking up his
daughter from the swimming pool or buying groceries)
while considering various constraints about when,
where, and for what duration the activities have to be
carried out.
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>B. Automated Planning</title>
        <p>Planning is one of the executive functions of the brain, and
thus a fundamental property of intelligent behavior. It involves
the explicit deliberation process that chooses and organizes
actions by anticipating their outcomes, aiming at achieving
some pre-stated objectives. Automated planning is the
computational study of this deliberation process. In particular,
plans are needed in many different areas of human endeavor
and often it is useful, if not essential, to create these plans
auto- matically. Automated planning technology now plays a
significant role in a variety of applications, ranging from
controlling space vehicles (such as the Mars Rover), managing
fire extinctions or controlling underwater vehicles. Specifically,
given a description of the possible initial states of the world, a
description of the desired goals, and a description of a set of
possible actions, the planning problem is to synthesize a plan
that, when applied to an initial state, is guaranteed to bring us
to a goal state which contains all the desired goals. As depicted
in Figure 1 the main elements of a planning problem are
characterized by the following components:
• State-transition system: a formal representation of the
real-world system we want to build plans for;
visit the monuments, taking into account the duration of the
visits and the appointments. Here, the setting was changed
from Florence to Rome, and the time frame was increased
from a single day to a weekend (two days). This allowed us to
make the exercise even more realistic, thus increasing its
ecological value, by adding the train and hotel reservations to
the tasks the patient must accomplish in order to plan the
vacation: the patient has to choose the train trip which allows
him to arrive at the right time and the hotel located in the right
place in order to complete all the tasks.</p>
        <p>At first, a few locations in Rome were selected among the
most famous tourist attractions, chosen between two
categories: locations which could be visited, and locations
where
• Controller performs actions that change the state of the
system;
• Planner: produces the plans which drive the controller.</p>
        <p>
          In 1998, in an attempt to standardize Artificial Intelligence
planning languages, Drew McDermott and his colleagues
proposed the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL)
[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
          ], inspired by STRIPS (STanford Research Institute Problem
Solver) and Adl (Action Description Language). In the next
section, we will show how PDDL describes the key elements of
Weekend in Rome.
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>III. THE DESIGN OF WEEKEND IN ROME</title>
      <p>The first step of the design phase of the exercise was laying
the groundwork and devising the basic concepts of the
exercise. This was followed by a precise analysis of the domain
and actions in the exercise, and the formalization in PDDL.</p>
      <p>The initial objective was to formulate how the basic
structure of the exercise. Weekend in Rome was inspired by
one paper-based exercise for executive functions
rehabilitation used at the Bellaria Hospital in Bologna, Map of
Florence: in this exercise, the patient is given a stylized map of
Florence and a list of monuments or places to visit (for
example, the Uffizi Gallery or the Piazza del Duomo), as well as
some fixed-time appointments (for example, meet your
friends for lunch at 1pm), and a starting time and location. The
patient then has to plan the visit, choosing in which order to
an event could occur (such as a concert). The chosen locations
were: the Trevi fountain, Saint Peters Basilica, the Colosseum,
the Pantheon, the Auditorium, the Ara Pacis, the Olympic
Stadium and the Trastevere neighbourhood. The intent was to
have some variety in the type of goals, which could range from
the classic visiting a tourist attraction (such as the Trevi
fountain), to attending a planned public event (such as a
concert at the Auditorium or a football match at the Olympic
Stadium) or a social occasion (such as having lunch with your
friends in Trastevere). To increase the realistic aspect all the
more, the patient is given two options for moving around the
city: by foot, or by bus. In the latter case, bus timetables have
to be taken into consideration as well. At this point, a
semirealistic map (see Figure 2) with the chosen locations, the
two train stations (Termini and Tiburtina), four hotels and
possible bus routes was sketched in order to aid the modeling.</p>
      <p>The next step was to choose the possible goals or tasks a
patient had to accomplish. The immediate goals which could
be defined were the train and hotel reservations. The latter
imply that the patient has to sleep at the reserved hotel. To
give a minimum of structure, it was decided to give a precise
time at which the patient must go to sleep. Two additional
tasks related to the hotel choice were defined to make the
exercise more authentic: having breakfast at the hotel (taking
into account breakfast hours), and exercising (doing
gymnastics) before breakfast. In regards to the tasks
pertaining to tourist activities, three main types were outlined:
Simple sightseeing tasks; Activity tasks; Timed activity tasks.</p>
      <p>From the very beginning the integration of automated
planning for the exercises implementation was recognized as
an essential requirement. One could argue that different
approaches would have been possible: for example, given that
the exercise basically consists in reaching a series of goals
while satisfying certain constraints, one method which could
come to mind is to solve the problem by modeling it as a
constraint satisfaction problem (CSP). What makes automated
planning a better solution is that while a CSP solver does find
a solution in which all constraints are satisfied, a planner
outputs the sequence of actions which can bring you to the
solution, which is exactly what the pa- tient is required to do
in order to train his executive functions. Thus, with automated
planning, we can compare the planners solution to the
patients to have a</p>
      <p>performance metric. Moreover, the use of automated
planning also allowed the implementation of a hint button
(suggesting the next action to execute) and a verify button
(giving the patient feedback on whether he is on the right track
or not) as features of the exercise.</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>A. PDDL Modelling and Integration</title>
        <p>Once the specification of the exercise was well defined, the
next phase was modeling it in PDDL. At first, the domain was
formalized, extrapolating the different possible actions and
predicates. The first step was to define the types of objects,
that is the entities involved: in this case, two types were
defined: time and place.</p>
        <p>
          Time has to be modeled explicitly because the solver we
used (the PDDL4J library [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
          ]) does not support some features
of PDDL 2.1 that would have helped in modeling time, namely
numeric fluents (for modeling non-binary resources) or
durative actions (which could have variable, non- discrete
length, conditions and effects). The basic idea of our
representation of time is that each atomic time unit is
represented by a time object. In the case of Weekend in Rome,
48 time objects were defined, corresponding to the 48 hours
of the two-day weekend. A chronological order is established
using predicates, and the passage of time is modeled by
marking these objects as in the past, present or future.
        </p>
        <p>Modeling the domain also required a preliminary analysis to
extrapolate the possible atomic actions in the different states.
This resulted in the following list of actions:
• Book train: the patient will use this action to choose
which trains to book. There are two possible situations:
the booking of a single journey, or the booking of a
roundtrip.
• Book hotel: action to choose the hotel to book, among
the 4 available.
• Wait: action to skip ahead in time of one hour.
• Travel: action to move around on the map. Two kind of
travel actions were implemented; travel by foot and
travel by bus. Both of the actions have a duration of one
hour; the advantage of traveling by bus was built into the
map layout (i.e. some bus routes act as a shortcut
between two places where two or more travel by foot
actions would be needed to get from one to the other).
• Sleep: action to go to sleep; two kind of sleep actions
were implemented: a short sleep with the duration of
four hours, and a long sleep with the duration of eight
hours. These actions can only be executed at the booked
hotel and at the determined sleep time, fixed by a specific
predicate.
• Have breakfast: action (with the duration of one hour) to
be done at the hotel after sleeping, during the breakfast
hours of the hotel.
• Do activity: this action represents the different activities
that can be done in the different locations (visit the
exhibition, do the guided tour, watch the football
match...).</p>
        <p>For simplicity, it was determined that all the activities
have the duration of two hours.
• Exercise: this action has the duration of one hour, and
must be done before breakfast.</p>
        <p>During the definition of the actions, additional predicates to
express accurately the preconditions and effects emerged as
well. Train predicates are used to define the possible outward,
return or round-trip journeys that are available for booking.
Map predicates are used to model the underlying map of
Rome and its mechanics, such as foot-path and bus-path to
specify which locations are accessible with which kind of
transport, opening-hours to define the opening hours of the
different locations, can-sleep and train-station to denote
whether a location is a hotel or a train station, breakfast-hours
to define the hours during which breakfast is available at the
hotel, and activity-available to mark the locations where an
activity is available. Predicates to keep track of goals are used
to keep track of the actions that have already been done, in
order to identify when all the goals have been satisfied. Some
examples are slept, visited, done-activity, done-activity-timed
and doneexercise.</p>
        <p>An example of action formalized using PDDL is presented in
Figure 3. The action Travel by Bus specifies that you can travel
by bus from a location ?src at the hour ?departuretime and to
a location ?dst arriving at the hour ?arrival-time. The
preconditions dictate that: the patient has to have finished the
reservations; the patient has to be in the start location at the
departure time; the arrival time must be hour immediately
following the departure time; there must be a bus path
between the two locations; the arrival time must be in the
future; there must be a bus scheduled on that route at the
departure time The effect equation says that, once the action
is applied, you are at the destination at the arrival time, are no
longer at the source location at the departure time, the
departure time and the arrival time are in the past (i.e. no
longer in the future), and the destination is marked as visited.</p>
        <p>Subsequently, a common structure for all the problem
instances was identified. Specifically, the common basis
consisted in:
• Objects: the objects involved are the same for each
problem: the locations and the 48 hours
• Initial state: most of the initial state description is
common to all instances, namely the predicates to model
the map and to model time.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>IV. IMPROVEMENT OF PLANNING BASED EXERCISES</title>
      <p>Weekend in Rome adopts original solutions concerning the
use of automatic planning in exercises for the rehabilitation of
executive functions. We present these solutions comparing
Weekend in Rome with other similar exercises based on
planning, namely two currently available planning exercises in
the MS-Rehab system (Plan-A-Day and ZooSafari visit), and the
Plan a Holiday exercise of the RehaCom cognitive training
software.</p>
      <p>The MS-Rehab version of Plan-A-Day is based on the
penand-paper version by Funke &amp; Kruger. In this exercise, the
patient has to schedule a list of tasks to complete during the
day (for example, picking up his daughter from the swimming
pool or buying groceries) while considering various constraints
about when, where, and for what duration the activities have
to be carried out. Conceptually, the exercise is similar to
Weekend In Rome: the patient has to move around on a map
and execute given tasks. However, in Weekend in Rome, there
is the additional difficulty of having to plan the train and hotel
reservations beforehand. In regards to the implementation,
one main difference is that in Plan-A-Day, the planner is called
after every action of the patient: if the new problem has a
solution, the patient may continue, otherwise the exercise
ends. This approach was not adopted for Weekend in Rome as
there was a risk of having long loading times while the planner
searched for a solution, making the exercise slow and
bothersome. Another difference is that in the case of
PlanADay, a new map is generated for each exercise; in Weekend
in Rome, there are 3 static maps (corresponding to the 3
difficulty levels). The complete map presented in Figure 2 is
associated to the high level, the easy and medium level maps
are obtained from this map removing some of the locations
and are illustrated in Figures 4 and 5. The logic for moving
around on the map was also changed from drag &amp; drop to
clicking, as the first proved to be not easy to use for patients
on tablet.</p>
      <p>ZooSafari Visit was the second planning exercise
implemented for MS-Rehab, inspired by the Zoo Map test. In
this exercise, the patient has to plan his route through a map
of the zoo, visiting a selection of locations while actively
disregarding others and obeying certain rules: for example, the
order of the locations to visit, or crossing certain paths only
once. In this case the approach used in Plan-A-Day (calling the
planner after each action of the patient) was also avoided.
However, Weekend in Rome offers two additional features to
exploit the planner, the Verify feature and the Hint feature: the
Verify feature (see Figure 6) will give the patient an input on
whether the problem is still solvable or not. In the latter case,
it will inform the patient of which goal is unsolvable and give
him the options to either continue in order to satisfy the other
goals, or end the exercise. The Hint button instead will give</p>
      <p>Fig. 5. Weekend in Rome Map: medium level.
the patient a hint on which action to perform next. For both of
these features, it is necessary to keep track of all the user
actions in order to update the problem state.</p>
      <p>
        A similar planning based exercise is available in the
RehaCom therapy system in the Plan a Vacation module, under
the name of Plan a HoliDay [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
        ]. Despite the name, the
exercise resembles more Plan-A-Day rather than Weekend in
Rome: the patients ability to organize and plan a day is trained,
in a realistic manner (particular tasks have to be dealt with at
specific places and must be completed within a given point in
time). Thus, the exercise does not included train or hotel
reservations, and plans are made only for one day - unlike
Weekend in Rome. However, Plan a HoliDay also provides an
almost endless number of different tasks since new
combinations of tasks can be generated randomly.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>V. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK</title>
      <p>The rehabilitation of executive functions is essential for
improving the quality of life of patients affected by multiple
sclerosis, as their impairment compromises even the simplest
day-to-day activities such as planning a meal or dressing
oneself. If it is possible to improve executive functions through
rehabilitation, then more people with MS might become more
independent with activities of daily living, and might respond
better to their rehabilitation. The objective of this work was
the design and implementation of a novel exercise for the
rehabilitation of executive functions and its subsequent
integration in the the MS-Rehab system. In this exercise, the
patient has to plan a two-day vacation in Rome by reserving
the trains and hotel, and planning the itinerary in the city while
taking into consideration a number of constraints, mirroring
the kind of limitations one would have to plan for in real life
(such as opening hours and bus schedules). This leads to the
first key aspect of the exercise: its high ecological value.
Indeed, while there are quite a few computerized cognitive
rehabilitation exercises which involve planning a day into the
city, none of them take place in a two-day span nor include the
train and hotel reservations. A second important aspect is the
generation of constantly new problems by combining
randomly the different tasks to be carried out. Careful
attention was also given to the user interface, in effort to make
it not only easy to navigate and intuitive for the patient, but
also pleasurable and fun in order to encourage the patient to
carry out the exercise even at home. Last but not least, a novel
feature which is not present in the other two planning
exercises of the MS-Rehab system was implemented: the Hint
feature, in which the patient is suggested the next action to
execute in order to carry out all the given tasks. The varying
difficulty levels were carefully defined in collaboration with a
psychologist specialized in cognitive rehabilitation, which also
deemed the exercise suitable for its planned purposes, that is
the rehabilitation of executive functions.</p>
      <p>A possible extension of the exercise would be to add a
budget constraint, implemented through numeric fluents in
PDDL (which are not currently supported by the PDDL4J
planner). The exercise could also be enriched with ulterior
activities to be carried out as tasks, such as a boat ride on the
Tiber, or a stroll in the Villa Borghese park. Maps representing
other cities, such as Florence or New York, could be designed
for variety.</p>
      <p>
        Another possible, but more challenging extension, would be
to implement a 3D version of the exercise, in which the patient
has to navigate through the streets of the city in firstperson
view, eventually exploiting Virtual Reality technologies.
Indeed, VR offers the potential to develop human testing and
training environments that allow for the precise control of
complex stimulus presentations in which human cognitive and
functional performance can be accurately assessed and
rehabilitated. Although further studies are needed, some 3D
applications are effective in treating cognitive deficits in
people with neurological diagnoses [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
        ].
      </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. H.</given-names>
            <surname>Benedict</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Zivadinov</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Risk factors for and management of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis,” Nature Reviews Neurology</article-title>
          , vol.
          <volume>7</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>6</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>332</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>342</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Rosti-Otajarvi</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>P. I. H</surname>
          </string-name>
          ¨ am¨ al¨ ainen, “
          <article-title>Neuropsychological reha-¨ bilitation for multiple sclerosis</article-title>
          ,
          <source>” Cochrane Database Syst Rev, no. 2</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Feb</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2014</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Iaffaldano</surname>
            , and
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Trojano</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Computer-assisted rehabilitation of attention in patients with multiple sclerosis: results of a randomized, double-blind trial</article-title>
          ,
          <source>” Multiple Sclerosis Journal</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>20</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>1</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>91</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>98</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2014</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Cerasa</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
            <surname>Gioia</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Valentino</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Nistico</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Chiriaco</surname>
          </string-name>
          , D. Pir-`
          <string-name>
            <surname>ritano</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tomaiuolo</surname>
            , G. Mangone,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Trotta</surname>
          </string-name>
          , T. Talarico et al., “
          <article-title>Computerassisted cognitive rehabilitation of attention deficits for multiple sclerosis: a randomized trial with fMRI correlates,” Neurorehabilitation and neural repair</article-title>
          , vol.
          <volume>27</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>4</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>284</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>295</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Gaspari</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Zini</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Castellano</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Pinardi</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Stecchi</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>An advanced system to support cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis</article-title>
          ,
          <source>” in Proceeding of IEEE RTSI</source>
          <year>2017</year>
          ,
          <article-title>3 International Forum on Research and Technologies for Society and Industry</article-title>
          . IEEE Press, IEEE Xplore digital library,
          <year>2017</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Murray</surname>
            , and
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nosarti</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Real-life impact of executive function impairments in adults who were born very preterm</article-title>
          ,
          <source>” Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>23</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>5</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>381</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>389</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          64, no.
          <issue>1</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>135</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>168</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2013</year>
          , pMID:
          <fpage>23020641</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>A. M. Owen</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Cognitive planning in humans: Neuropsychological, neuroanatomical and neuropharmacological perspectives,” Progress in Neurobiology</article-title>
          , vol.
          <volume>53</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>4</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>431</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>450</lpage>
          ,
          <year>1997</year>
          . [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030100829700042 7
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Baddeley</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Wilson</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Frontal amnesia and the dysexecutive syndrome,” Brain and Cognition</article-title>
          , vol.
          <volume>7</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>2</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>212</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>230</lpage>
          ,
          <year>1988</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Matchett</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Cognitive Rehabilitation Therapy for Traumatic Brain Injury: Evaluating the Evidence, ser</article-title>
          . Institute of Medicine.
          <source>The National Academies Press</source>
          ,
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Oosterman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Wijers</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Kessels</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Planning or something else? examining neuropsychological predictors of zoo map performance</article-title>
          ,
          <source>” Applied Neuropsychology: Adult</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>20</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>2</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>103</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>109</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Funke</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Kruger</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Plan-A-Day: Konzeption eines modifizierbaren¨ Instruments zur Fuhrungskr¨ afte-Auswahl sowieerste empirische Befunde¨ [Plan-A-Day: Design of a modifiable instrument for selecting managerial personnel and first empricial results],” in Neue Konzepte und Instrumente zur Planungsdiagnostik</article-title>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Funke</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Kruger</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>and</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <surname>A</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Fritz, Eds.¨ Deutscher Psychologen Verlag,
          <year>1995</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>97</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>120</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Baschieri</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Gaspari</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Zini</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>A planning-based serious game for cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis,” in Proceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good, ser</article-title>
          . Goodtechs '
          <fpage>18</fpage>
          . New York, NY, USA: ACM,
          <year>2018</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>214</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>219</lpage>
          . [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.
          <source>org/10</source>
          .1145/3284869.3284916
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Pellier</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Fiorino</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Pddl4j: a planning domain description library for java</article-title>
          ,
          <source>” Journal of Experimental &amp; Theoretical Artificial Intelligence</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <issue>34</issue>
          ,
          <year>12 2017</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15] ASOMED GmbH, “
          <article-title>Rehacom user manual - plan a vacation,”</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tech. Rep.</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2015</year>
          . [Online]. Available: http://www.rehacom.com
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Tieri</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Morone,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Paolucci</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Iosa</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Virtual reality in cognitive and motor rehabilitation: facts, fiction and fallacies,” Expert Review of Medical Devices</article-title>
          , vol.
          <volume>15</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>2</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>107</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>117</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Perez-Marcos</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Bieler-Aeschlimann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>and</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Serino</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Virtual Reality as a Vehicle to Empower Motor-Cognitive Neurorehabilitation,” Front Psychol</article-title>
          , vol.
          <volume>9</volume>
          , p.
          <fpage>2120</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>