=Paper= {{Paper |id=Vol-2475/short6 |storemode=property |title=Study The Impact of Electronic Tests Using Moodle Program on Student Achievement |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2475/short6.pdf |volume=Vol-2475 |authors=Ali Obaid,Khansaa Al-Husseini }} ==Study The Impact of Electronic Tests Using Moodle Program on Student Achievement== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2475/short6.pdf
     Study the Impact of Electronic Tests Using Moodle
              Program on Student Achievement
                  [1]
                        Ali Hamzah Obaid, [2]Khansaa Azeez Obayes Al-Husseini
 1
   Babylon Technical Institute, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University,51015 Babylon, Iraq.
               inb.ali210@atu.edu.iq, alimk_iq@yahoo.com
 2 Babylon Technical Institute, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University,51015 Babylon, Iraq.
            inb.khansaa@atu.edu.iq, azeezkhansaa@gmail.com




        Abstract. The study aims to urge educators to utilize electronic tests rather
        than customary tests. And the present study examines the relation between
        Computerized using the Moodle program and Traditional Tests. And it sought
        to increase the collection and development of the positive abilities of students
        and to demonstrate their educational skills through the performance of electron-
        ic tests and their effects in raising the student's level of study and compare them
        to the traditional test method by applying these tests to the group of students of
        the ″Department of Computer Systems at the Institute Technical Babylon Uni-
        versity of the Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University ″ by (60) students for the
        academic year 2018-2019 . Statistical analysis showed that the E-test group
        outperformed the paper-based test group. and a major effect on the students’
        achievements.

        Keywords: - Electronic tests, Moodle, Examination system, E-learning




1 Introduction

The modern Electronic Testing has a more forty-year history. but still, universities
and most professors are not interested in this field for several reasons. Electronic tests
differ from traditional tests (paper) in many characteristics, the most important of
which is that electronic tests used in a multimedia presentation of text, voice, image
and True, false and multiple choices, which increases the student's motivation and
participation more and the launch of intellectual creativity.
   Universities in Iraq have chosen the path of creating their own learning But most
universities combine a form of learning, opt for free LMS software instead, Moodle,
Google Classroom. As the best “investment” to the future seems to be a Moodle has
to continue development ). Moodle is increasingly appearing also in universities.
Where it Electronic test activity is an interesting research subject affecting To learn
the students' levels of understanding and awareness of educational materials. The
study describes one of these Electronic Testing and Moodle presents the outcomes of
a survey about electronically testing.
___________________________
Copyright © 2019 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribu-
tion 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
In: P. Sosnin, V. Maklaev, E. Sosnina (eds.): Proceedings of the IS-2019 Conference, Ulyanovsk, Russia,
24-27 September 2019, published at http://ceur-ws.org
                                                                                       233




1.1     The Case of This Study
Case study as a research strategy often emerges as an obvious option for researchers
based on their workplace. Therefore, it was necessary to prove the suitability of the
electronic tests and their preference for the traditional tests in terms of success rates
and the exam time.


1.2     Problem Statement
The problem of searching the answer is limited to the following question:
   The extent of the impact of the use of electronic tests on raising the levels of stu-
dent grades and the effectiveness of using the Moodle program proposed for use in
this study and the branch of this question to:
   The effectiveness of the proposed program in increasing and influencing the stu-
dent's grades, comparing the proposed program with the traditional tests, learning the
positive trends of the electronic tests in the direction of the education programs, and
comparing the time between the traditional test and the electronic test.


1.3     Research Limits
      The study was limited to:
          1. Course content for computer maintenance (students are provided with
              subjects to be studied)
          2. Students enrolled in the Department of Computer Systems Technology
              Class I.
          3. Proposed Moodle Program.



1.4     Why This Study
         Previous studies have been conducted on school students or faculty members
and few on university students. This study dealt with the subject of electronic tests for
students of technical institutes



2       Theoretical Framework and Previous Studies

There are several studies in the field of electronic tests, including those who question
the level of the understudies and its effect on the aftereffects of the tests, understudies
234


not obviously favor PC testing and assessment to educator's evaluation (JULIA
TOMANOVÁ,MARTIN CÁPAY), Many scholars believe that e-learning facilitates
the processes and services provided to all parties in the teaching process (Bates and
Paul 2003, Park Nason 2004). Perhaps one of the most important characteristics of
current studies in the field of assessment has been to focus on the process of interac-
tion between assessment and learning, focusing on multiple building options of tests
that are strong in the learning experiences of students.(Black and William, 1998). The
results of some studies, such as the Allam 2007 and Alkabisi 2007, indicate that the
tests are an important means of measuring and evaluating the abilities of students at
different levels of study, meeting the targets of education and measuring the learning
of students. The elements of success and the identification of students' strengths and
weaknesses can be identified in order to improve and develop the level, as well as the
effectiveness of the strategies of mutual teaching and effectiveness. Despite the im-
portance of electronic testing and its usefulness, many teachers prefer to use tradition-
al tests .( Davidson, 2003 ).


2.1    The Moodle
The Moodle is used as a learning resource, as teaching-learning-assessment means
alongside traditional teaching, learning, and assessment. The Moodle has been im-
plemented within the Babylon Technical Institute, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical Uni-
versity in last years and even though its use has not become compulsory so far, where
it contributes to making the learning in electronic tests process between student and
the teaching it is better.


2.2    The E-Testing
The E-Testing is a rapidly growing territory of re-evaluation including the convey-
ance of assessments and appraisals on PCs, either utilizing neighborhood frameworks
or online frameworks. This includes the exchange of paper tests to PC or a mix of
strategies to take e-testing to the PC.


2.3    The E-Learning
E-learning is an instructive technique that plans to give instructive or preparing pro-
jects to understudies or students whenever and wherever utilizing data and corre-
spondence innovation (ICT) [3].
   Parts of e-Learning can incorporate the substance of various organizations, the
board of the learning background, and an online network of students, content design-
ers, and specialists. In Iraq, E-learning has turned into an undeniably pervasive learn-
ing approach in higher instructive organizations because of the quick development of
web advancements. Though Improving the exhibition of e-learning administrations to
give an adaptable and viable e-learning framework is a major test for instructive asso-
ciations. The e-learning framework faces numerous difficulties in learning administra-
                                                                                         235


tions, and specialized administrations (for example asset provisioning and money
related expense).


2.4    Traditional Testing
          The traditional test is a Traditional paper test. Teachers use a pattern of essay
questions or some multiple-choice questions. Examination students must answer pa-
per, affecting thinking processes and distinguishing students' memorization skills.



3      Materials and Methods

The purpose of the research was to find out if the -Testing by Moodle had a better
than the traditional tests (paper). We analyzed and compared electronic tests by Moo-
dle and traditional tests (paper) in raising students' level. Researchers used a set of
statistical standards, and the researcher relied on the quasi-experimental approach
because it is the appropriate method for the purpose of research.


3.1    Study and Sample Population
The research adopted an experimental design with partial control of two groups, one
experiment, and the other control.
   sample population: The study population consists of students of the Computer Sys-
tems Department at the ″Technical Institute of Babylon, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical
University″, who study computer maintenance.
   The study sample: The study was conducted on a group of students enrolled in the
computer maintenance course via the second semester of the scholarly year 2018-
2019. The number of students was 60 students. And the students were aged between
18 and 20 years old. The students were divided into two groups of 30 students.
   Experimental Group: This group (30) students, the first test using The traditional
test (Paper) method, Second test using electronic test by Moodle.
   Control Group: This group is (30) students, the first test using the traditional test
(Paper)method, Second test using electronic test by Moodle.
   In the following table (1), the percentages of males and females in each group
                              Table 1. Male and female ratios

                Group                   Gender           No.        Ratio           su
                                                                                m
                                        Males            12          40%
         Experimental Group                                                         30
                                       Females           18          60%
                                        Males            10         33.33%
            Control Group                                                           30
                                       Females           20         66.66%
236


        From the above table, the number of Females (38) and ratio (63.33%), while
the number of males (22) and the ratio (36.66%) .




                          Fig. 1. The percentages of males and females

          The researchers were keen to achieve equality between the two groups by
obtaining the grades of students of the two groups (Experimental Group, Control
Group) from the examination committee in the department, after the adoption of Sta-
tistical processes. Researchers confirmed that the two groups are equal. can be seen in
Table (2)
                   Table 2. the mean, SD and t value (calculated and tabulated)

Group        No.        mean      V           SD df     Calculated     tabulated      sig
Experi-                                                                               Not
             30         75.5   139.7    11.71
mental                                                                             signifi-
                                                 63     1.08             2
                                                                                   cant at
Control      30         74.4   130.3    10.98
                                                                                   0.05

  pre-test A pre-test was conducted for the study group. The differences between the
two groups were as in Table (3). In a traditional tests.
                         Table 3. the mean, SD and t value in a pre-test

                                                                        tabulat-
   Group          No.      mean        V        SD     df Calculated                 sig
                                                                           ed
  Experi-                                                                            Not
                   30      67.5       127.5    10.40
  mental                                                                           signifi-
                                                       60      1.07        2.00
                                                                                   cant at
  Control          30      68.6       129.6    10.92
                                                                                     0.05

          It is clear from the statistical results between the results of the two groups in
the tribal test that the value of T and the relationship between the two groups is not
significant at 0.05. Showing homogeneity between the two groups, thus the require-
ment of the composition of the two groups.
                                                                                    237


3.2    Test Application
The researchers told the students of the two groups that there is a test for them on the
subjects given to them, The tests in the final version will take place on day Monday,
1-2-2019 at the same time.
   Believe the test Questions were asked to a group of computer teachers to take
opinions in the traditional and electronic tests and were approved.



4      Statistical Methods

4.1    T-Test
The T-test provides the calculation of the sample mean and standard deviation.


4.2    Pearson Correlation Coefficient
 The researchers used The Pearson coefficient of linear correlation can be calculated
in terms of the two variables. to calculate each of the tests.


4.3    Equation Discrimination
 This method was used to find the discriminating force coefficients of the Test para-
graphs.


4.4    Effectiveness of Distractors
 This method was used to find the effectiveness of incorrect substitutes for the Test
paragraphs



5      Results and Discussion

On the results obtained, Are electronic tests using Moodle better than paper tests? Is
there an equivalence in scores between electronic tests and paper tests? To answer this
question using the researcher Use the test (T-Test Calculator for two Independent
Means) at 0.05. show Table (4).
238


                                                  Table 4. T-Test

                      Max      Min.               Var     Standard                   p-
                                          Me                                  T-
   Group       No     de-      de-                ianc    Devia-      DF             val-       sig
                                          an                                  test
                      gree     gree               e       tion                       ue
 Tradition-
 al Test-                                 50.     127.
               30     65       22                         11.29
 ing(Paper                                2       54                                            is
 )                                                                            8.2    0.00    signifi-
                                                                      59
 E-                                                                           2      001     cant at
 Test-                                    74.     132.                                       0.05
               30     100      51                         11.50
 ing(Mood                                 4       3
 le)

          His study includes displaying the results reached by the researchers accord-
ing to their hypothesis (there was no difference at (0.05) between the average
achievement of E-Test (Moodle) student and the average achievement of students in
the traditional-test (Paper ) in computer maintenance ).To verify this hypothesis, the
researchers used a t-test tow independent sample using the SPSS program, to scorcher
the difference between the E-Test (Moodle) and traditional-test (Paper ) groups as a
show table (5).
   The variance of the E-Test (Moodle) group (132.3) and its mean (74. 4) while the
mean of the traditional-test group which was tested (normal) was (127.54) and the
difference was (50. 2). this indicates that there are indicators of mean differences
variance for E-Test (Moodle)l and traditional-test scores, in the test conducted after
the statistical analysis, the calculated t value (8.22142) (P-value is <.00001. The out-
come is noteworthy at p < .05). was greater than the degree from freedom (59).
   thus, rejecting the zero hypothesis because the E-Test (Moodle) group appeared
superior to the traditional-test (Paper) group. The E-Test (Moodle) of the model af-
fected the achievement of students.
              Table 5. t-test time between Traditional Testing and E-Testing(Moodle)

                            Max.    Min.                  Standard    T-
      Group         No.                          Mean                           p-value        sig
                            time    time                  Deviation   test
 Traditional
               30           3000    900         2370.83    374.98                           is signifi-
Testing(Paper)
                                                                      10.40     0.00001     cant     at
    E-Test
               30           1860    720         1435.47    318.78                           0.05
  (Moodle)

        His study includes displaying the results reached by the researchers according
to their hypothesis (there was no difference at (0.05) between time Traditional Testing
and E-Testing(Moodle), As a result of the analysis of T-Test(10.40) and p-value
(0.00001), there are statistically eloquent variation between the time needed to per-
form the electronic and paper tests. The time of the electronic test is less than the time
of the paper test. The study agrees with Olsen (1990; Weiss, 1985; Moreno et al.,
                                                                                       239


1984; Austin, 1991) that the time required to perform the electronic test is 25-72%
and is consistent with De Beer & Visser (1998) ; Ryan et al., 2000) of the characteris-
tics of electronic test saving time.




6      Conclusions

 Those using Electronic tests (Moodle) get better grades than use Traditional paper
  tests.
 Understanding the electronic tests (Moodle) will allow us to determine which ac-
  tions might be carried out to boost, to improve both skills and grades.


7       Recommendations

Through the results obtained from this study, which proves that the electronic test by
Moodle program is better of the paper tests, the researchers recommend applying the
electronic tests at Al-Furat Middle University and applying it in the scientific sub-
jects. And encourage professors to grapple with and apply some of the key principles
of this research approach.



References:
 1. Cápay, M. Electronic Automated Evaluated Tests in the Subject of Programming. In
    DIVAI 2010 – Distance Learning in Applied Informatics. Nitra. 2010. ISBN 978-80-8094-
    691-3.
 2. Zhenming, Y., Liang, Z., Guohua, Z.: A novel web-based online examination system for
    computer science education. In: 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference,
    Boulder, Co. (2003)Google Scholar.
 3. [Al-araibi, Asma Ali Mosa; Mahrin, Mohd Naz'ri bin; Yusoff, Rasimah Che Mohd Educa-
    tion and Information Technologies, v24 n1 p567-590 Jan 2019
 4. https://docs.moodle.org/37/en/Question_types
 5. Dong, L. Y., & Huang, R. (2011). Designing collaborative E-learning environments based
    upon semantic wiki: from design models to application scenarios. Educational Technology
    & Society, 14(4), 49–63.Google Scholar
 6. Joseph Bleiberg, Robert L. Kane, Dennis L. Reeves, William S. Garmoe & Ellen
    Halpern(2000) Factor Analysis of Computerized and Traditional Tests Used in Mild Brain
    Injury Research, The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 14:3, 287-294, DOI: 10.1076/1385-
    4046(200008)14:3;1-P;FT287.
 7. Aristovnik, A. (2012) ‘The impact of ICT on educational performance and its efficiency
    inselected EU and OECD countries: a non-parametric analysis’, The Turkish Online Jour-
    nal of Educational Technology, Vol. 3, No. 11, pp.144–152.
 8. OPROIU G.C. A Study about Using E-learning Platform (Moodle) in University Teaching
    Process, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 180, pp. 426 –432, 2014.
240


 9. [ThomasN.RobbKyoto(Japan)http://www.tesl-
    ej.org/ej30/m2.html]
10. Savery,R. John (2002): Faculty and Student Perceptions of Technology Integration in
    Teaching, The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, Volume 1, Number 2, ISSN: 1541-
    4914.
11. Khansaa Azeez Obayes Al-Husseini , Ali Hamzah Obaid ,USAGE OF PROTOTYPING
    IN SOFTWARE TESTING, Multi-Knowledge Electronic Comprehensive Journal For Ed-
    ucation And Science Publications . ISSUE (14), Nov (2018) .
12. Khansaa Azeez Obayes Al-Husseini : RISK MANAGEMENT TOOLS IN THE DESIGN
    OF AUTOMATED SYSTEMS . p 287 INTERACTIVE SYSTEMS: Problems of Human-
    Computer Interaction . Ulyanovsk , Russia: USTU, 2017. − 290 p. UDC 681.518 (04) .
    ISBN 978-5-9795-1692-9 .
13. Ali Hamzah Obaid : TOOLS FOR CONCEPTUAL-ALGORITHMIC PROTOTYPING IN
    SOLVING DESIGN PROBLEMS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF SYSTEMS WITH
    SOFTWARE . p 276 . INTERACTIVE SYSTEMS: Problems of Human-Computer Inter-
    action . Ulyanovsk , Russia: USTU, 2017. − 290 p. UDC 681.518 (04) . ISBN 978-5-9795-
    1692-9 .