<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Improving the Accuracy of Hydrocarbon Reserves Estimation Based on an Integrated Approach</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>D.A. Zavyalov</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Development project</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Tomsk Polytechnic University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Tomsk</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="RU">Russia</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2009</year>
      </pub-date>
      <abstract>
        <p>The paper presents an integrated approach to computer modeling of hydrocarbon deposits, as well as the results of its application in oil volume calculation. Such approach involves all available information, as well as visual analytics, and allows to get a more accurate and reliable distribution of parameters in the volume of the three-dimensional computer model of hydrocarbon deposit due to its adjustment based on actual (historical) information about the operation of the oil field. The adjusted in this way model allows to obtain a more accurate predictive solution for the development and to improve the management efficiency of hydrocarbon deposits.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>oil and gas field</kwd>
        <kwd>oil field managing</kwd>
        <kwd>oil volume calculation</kwd>
        <kwd>integrated approach</kwd>
        <kwd>visual analytics</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>The hydrocarbon field is a large socio-economic system
(SES) that has a complex hierarchical structure and is closely
interconnected with other SES (administratively,
infrastructurally, economically), and sometimes determines
their progress. The hydrocarbon field includes both
underground oil deposits and ground-based infrastructure
(pipelines, power plants, residential and working premises,
roads, etc.), as well as drilled wells (oil-production, injection,
water-production, and others). Usually three organizational
systems participate in managing a field at different stages: the
state, a subsoil user company, and a project institute, which
include specialists of different profiles, whose interaction is
often inconsistent.</p>
      <p>Considering the volume of capital investments (the cost of
drilling and developing wells, conducting research and field
works) and the operating costs of developing the fields, as well
as the degree of uncertainty in carrying out the works, the
planning task becomes critical in managing the field as a
socioeconomic system. This problem is solved with the development
designing process, the result of which is a long-term strategy
for the functioning of the field.</p>
      <p>The basis of any field development project is detailed
threedimensional computer model, the accuracy and reliability of
which determine the feasibility of the development strategy,
and therefore the management efficiency of the SES
"hydrocarbon field" [1].</p>
      <p>computer
models
of</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Three-dimensional hydrocarbon fields</title>
      <p>The field model is a three-dimensional digital interpretation
of the real formation according to a number of parameters
(porosity, permeability, oil saturation, etc.), and the modeling
process itself is the restoration of those parameters from several
observation points (studies in drilled wells). Obviously, in the
early stages of deposits lifecycle, the reliability of geological
models is lower due to the smaller number of such observation
points. However, the reliability of the models is determined not
only by the density of the grid of observations or the quality of
research, but also by the complexity and heterogeneity of the
geological structure of the field. To increase the reliability of
field models, an integrated approach to modeling is required,
which means the involving of all available information, as well
as visualization tools and visual analytics.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. An integrated model of hydrocarbon field</title>
      <p>In this paper, the effectiveness of the use of an integrated
field model by the effect on the reliability (in terms of accuracy
of estimating oil reserves) of the geological model and reserves
estimation is assessed.</p>
      <p>To assess the reliability of oil reserves estimation on the
basis of the integrated model, one of the fields of Tomsk
Region the designing history of which includes more than one
reserves calculation project was selected. There are geological
models and protocols about approved oil reserves on their
basis, as well as data on drilled production wells and
retrospective information (historical data) on their operation
regimes (table 1).
2006
2007
2008
2009</p>
      <p>Hydrocarbon
reserves
estimation
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔</p>
      <p>The first hydrocarbon reserves estimation at the field was
carried out in 2006, the subsequent ones were in 2008 and 2011.
Industrial development of the field has been conducted from
2008 to the present (data are available till 2016).</p>
      <p>As an illustration of changes in ideas about the geological
structure of the field, fig. 1 shows the structural maps of the top
of the reservoir in different years of calculating reserves, which
were approved at the state level. Fig. 2 presents the history of
the designing of this field based on available project and
historical data.</p>
      <p>The volume of oil reserves approved in 2006 at the field
was 5,825 thousand tons. This calculation was carried out on
the eastern part of the reservoir, in which an inflow of oil from
a drilled well was obtained.</p>
      <p>
        In 2007, on the basis of the first oil reserves calculation, the
first project document for the field was developed, according to
which its commercial operation began in 2008. The oil inflows
got in 3 drilled wells gave reason to carry out a new calculation
of oil reserves in 2008 and to put the remaining oil deposits on
the balance of the subsoil user (the volume of reserves
increased to 17,744 thousand tons) – the reservoir area has
increased according to the modelling results.
of the field in time: a) 2006, b) 2008, c) 2011
project document was developed for the operation of the field,
which involved intensive drilling of the reservoir – 19 new
wells were drilled, some of which did not confirm the oil
content of part of the reservoir. Thus in 2011, the third
calculation of reserves was carried out, which reduced the area
of the deposit and the reserves - their volume decreased to
15,973 thousand tons of oil.
where Vo is the volume of oil reserves; i, n – respectively, the
index and the number of cells in the model; Vbi – the rock
volume, Poroi – the porosity coefficient, Soi – the oil saturation
coefficient of the i-th cell of the model; ρo – the oil density; Bo
– the volumetric coefficient of oil [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2, 3</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Moreover, in a two-phase system (oil-water), the sum of
saturations is equal to one, therefore, So in each cell of the model
is calculated by the formula:
−

1
) , (2)
where ρw is the density of water, ρo – the density of oil, g – the
acceleration of gravity, h – the height relative to the level of free
water, γ – the surface tension between oil and water, θ – the
wettability angle, A and B are the coefficients of the power
dependence of the Leverett J-function, which has the form:
where coefficients A and B are calculated on the basis of the
results of laboratory core tests.</p>
      <p>In geological modeling, the calculation of permeability in
models is based on the results of geophysical studies in wells as
a function of porosity. Darcy's law allows to solve the inverse
problem of calculating the permeability value in the well area:
 (
) =  ∗</p>
      <p>− ,
 = 
∗
18.41∗  ∗  ∗(ln( )−0.75+ )
ℎ∗( ̅ − 
)
,
where qo is the oil production rate (m3/day), K – the permeability
(mD), h – the effective reservoir thickness (m), Pr – the average
reservoir pressure (atm), Pwf – the bottomhole pressure of the
well (atm), μo – the oil viscosity in reservoir conditions (cP), Bo
– oil volumetric coefficient (m3/m3), re – drainage radius (m), rw
– well radius (m), S – skin factor.</p>
      <p>In the designing of hydrocarbon field development, thematic
mapping
is
widely
used
for
operational
monitoring
of
development, visual analysis of the history and development
status, prediction of reservoir behavior and so on. In addition,
such tools as time series analysis, slices of multidimensional
data, sections of data cubes, geological and statistical sections
and others are widely used for visual analytics [4, 5, 6, 7, 8].</p>
      <p>At the first step, to analyze the correspondence of the
parameters of the field model to the real reservoir, maps of the
distribution of the actual and
model oil production
were
constructed, which</p>
      <p>made it possible to conclude that the
geological model of the field was unreliable and there is the need
for its correction. Based on a comparison of production maps,
areas of the model that require adjustment of parameters were
identified (fig. 4).</p>
      <p>To correct permeability in the 2008 project model time series
characterizing the dynamics of actual production of wells were
analyzed, after that, based on (4) new values of permeability in
wells
were
calculated.</p>
      <p>Interpolation
of
new
values
of
permeability in the volume of the reservoir model allows to
adjust the initial oil saturation according to (3), (2) and further
recalculating of the initial oil reserves by formula (1).</p>
      <p>The average value of reservoir permeability decreased by
12.1% (from 6.79 mD to 5.97 mD), oil saturation decreased by
1.4% (from 0.579 u.f. to 0.571 u.f.), which led to a reduction in
the recalculated oil reserves by 0.9% compared with the standard
approach.
5), initial oil saturation (fig. 6) and initial oil reserves over the
area and volume of the oilfield model, which makes it possible
to obtain a more correct forecast decision and make more
adequate
field
development
strategy.</p>
      <p>The
recalculated
parameters turned out to be closer in value to the parameters
obtained in the 2011 project, when 12% of oil reserves were
written off.
Fig. 5. Average maps of permeability: a) approved model, b)
adjusted</p>
      <p>The use of such an integrated approach to modeling a number
of fields has let to increase the accuracy of estimating
hydrocarbon reserves by 0.7 to 3.2%.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Conclusion</title>
      <p>The paper presents an integrated approach to estimating the
volume of hydrocarbon reserves, which allows to increase the
accuracy of such an assessment and the reliability of the
geological model of the field. The model adjusted in this way
allows to obtain a more accurate predictive solution for the
development and to improve the management efficiency of the
SES “hydrocarbon field”.
b)
Fig. 6. Average maps of oil saturation: a) approved</p>
      <p>model, b) adjusted model</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. Acknowledgements</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>6. References</title>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>This work has been supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation with the Grant No</article-title>
          .
          <volume>2</volume>
          .1642.
          <year>2017</year>
          /4.6. [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Novikov</surname>
            <given-names>D.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Organizational Systems</surname>
          </string-name>
          Management
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Theory</surname>
          </string-name>
          . 3rd ed. - Moscow: Publishing house of physical
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>and mathematical literature</source>
          ,
          <year>2012</year>
          . - 604 p.
          <article-title>[2] Determining of design parameters for calculating reserves</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          Polytechnic University [Bulletin of TPU].
          <source>- 2012</source>
          . - V.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          320, №
          <article-title>1: Earth sciences</article-title>
          . - [P.
          <fpage>142</fpage>
          -146] [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zakrevsky</surname>
            <given-names>K.E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Workshop on geological 3D modeling</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>Building a test model in Petrel</source>
          <year>2009</year>
          /
          <year>2010</year>
          . - 110 p.
          <article-title>[4] Guidelines for the preparation of technical projects for the</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>Resources of Russia. 18.05</source>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          [
          <article-title>5] Guidelines for the application of the classification of</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>Resources of Russia. 01.02</source>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ding</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Xue</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cao</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Zhang,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Fine</surname>
          </string-name>
          3-D geology
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>Linpan oilfield // (2019) Springer Series in Geomechanics</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>and Geoengineering</source>
          , (
          <volume>216039</volume>
          ), pp.
          <fpage>201</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>211</lpage>
          . [7]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bie</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cui</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Xia</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>An integrated</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>model // (2019) Springer Series in Geomechanics and</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Geoengineering</surname>
          </string-name>
          , (
          <volume>216039</volume>
          ), pp.
          <fpage>1560</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1567</lpage>
          . [8]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pakyuz-Charrier</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Giraud</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ogarko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lindsay</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          ) Tectonophysics,
          <fpage>747</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>748</lpage>
          , pp.
          <fpage>16</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>39</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>