<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>S. Ristov, M. Jovanov, M. Gusev, M. Mihova. Curriculum reorganization and courses' collaboration in
computer science // IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Information Modeling Technology in The Conditions of Students Visual Learning</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>1 North Caucasus Federal University, Stavropol, 355009, Russia Federation</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>2 Stavropol Regional Institute for the Development of Education, Advanced Training and Retraining of Educators</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Stavropol, 355002</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="RU">Russia</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2019</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <fpage>0</fpage>
      <lpage>13</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>In the article, on the basis of a theoretical analysis of modern trends in the development of the learning practice in higher education, some ways of integrating the information modeling technology into the process of students visual learning are shown. The study was limited to mental modeling, including actions and operations, without which it is impossible a complex process of constructive and meaningful analysis of different information and its use in the building of models. It is shown that in terms of visual learning it is possible to use different modeling options - visual (visual analogues, diagrams); sign (ordered, topological, graph recording); mathematical (equivalent circuits, program replacements). It is noted that in the students activity in educational modeling, the emphasis should be shifted to such types of actions as: transformation of connections and systematization of the simulated structure's elements in order to highlight the principle of its construction; fixing the properties of the structure in the subject, graphic or sign models; fixing methods of action in graphic or sign models (construction of schemes of action); modeling changes in the structure of the studied object, etc. Special attention in the article is paid to the correlation of the operational and constructive-informative ways of analyzing the objects studied by students.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The development of modern science and technology requires the readiness of university graduates to solve creative
problems, which is possible only if the universities themselves will improve the forms and methods of professional
training of students. Today, such improvement is directly related to the use of computers and their accompanying
software. They not only expand the opportunities of the theoretical and practical base for organizing training for
various disciplines, but also promote development of the students creative abilities, arming them with modern
methods of learning. Special value among them is information modeling, which is understood as the study of
objects, phenomena or processes on their information models.</p>
      <p>An information model is an approximate description and a possible demonstration of an object, process or
phenomenon that is significant from the point of view of learning objectives and implemented by means of
information technology.</p>
      <p>The practical application of information modeling implies the ability to analyze various types of information,
to use visibility, its descriptive, schematic or symbolic form.</p>
      <p>P.F. Kapterev [Kap82], referring to the visibility problem, wrote: \If learning should be based on the natural
course of human development, then it should start with the same thing as nature begins - to induce a person’s
sensual mind and gradually translate it to distractions. Visual learning is the only correct and natural method
of education, fully responding to the development of individuals. "</p>
      <p>E.G. Mingazov [Min86] believes that the term \visibility" should be considered in three senses: 1) as an
object; 2) as a property of real objects; 3) as a specific activity on the use of visibility.</p>
      <p>All this is possible in the organization of visual learning - such a didactic process in which the operation of
visual images takes place with the aim of:
- fixing and transmitting information of a certain type [Pos89];
- the development of students not only visual, but also motor sensations [Pol07];
- the use of linguistic and extralinguistic means [Gor18].</p>
      <p>Achieving the results of visual learning is directly related to the ability of the subject to see the unity of
the properties of the object and model in one of three aspects: structural (from the side of the model and the
object structure), functional (from the work of the main mechanisms of the object and the model structure) and
informational (from the information, which the model and the object contain).</p>
      <p>The main and most common requirement for modeling is the materiality of the similarity and the irrelevance
of the difference between the model and the original in the context of a specific cognitive task.</p>
      <p>In psychology modeling is considered a product of complex cognitive activity. The positive aspects of modeling
are: the ability to go beyond the border of the sensually achieved reflection of hidden essential connections and
relationships of things - a combination, linking various sensory images, a recovery of scientific information from
memory; scientific prediction of the events course, processes in the conscious formulation of not only immediate,
but also distant goals, the development of plans for activities and projects; the implementation ideal action
models in practice [Dos17].</p>
      <p>The problem of modeling is widely discussed in pedagogical sources [Vez14] [Pan18], [Zen18] and others.
Appeal to scientific sources shows that the concept of "modeling" has at least three meanings: 1) the method of
objects cognition through their models; 2) the process of building these models; 3) the form of cognitive activity.
The most common is the first option. From the whole variety of definitions, from our point of view, the most
acceptable is the formulation given by I.B. Novik and A.I. Uemov [Nov68]: modeling is "an indirect practical
or theoretical study of an object where is studied not itself an interested object, but some auxiliary natural or
artificial system (model):
- located in some objective accordance with a cognizable object;
- able to replace it at certain stages of knowledge;
- giving while researching, ultimately, information about the simulated object" .</p>
      <p>Note that in everyday life a person uses modeling in the form of intuitive analogization for many thousands
of years. But as a strict scientific method, it has only a few decades. Today, modeling has acquired a general
scientific character and is used in studies of living and inanimate nature, in the sciences of man and society,
in forming approaches to the construction of new pedagogical systems and technologies for informatization of
education [Gor09].</p>
      <p>Along with the term \modeling" in the scientific lexicon, the term \Building Informational Modeling" is used,
implying the process by which the object information model is formed. From the theory of information modeling,
it follows that the information model acts as a set of interrelated descriptions of concepts about the subject of
study based on the use of sign systems. The information model reflects the qualitative and quantitative properties
of the objects that make up the subject of study, as well as the logical, functional, spatial and temporal relations
between them.</p>
      <p>In other words, the possibilities of the information modeling method are unlimited. It can be used to create
a variety of models for:</p>
      <p>- determining the characteristics of the objects and processes under study; understanding the essence of
phenomena and developing the ability to control them; building new or upgrading existing facilities;
- making informed decisions; anticipating the consequences of their activities;
- obtaining new information about the object based on the model;
- integration and systematization of information about the object; saving and transferring information about
the object modeling.</p>
      <p>However, it should be borne in mind that information models used for educational purposes, as a rule, are not
universal. Each of them is designed to simulate a fairly narrow range of phenomena. Based on the technology of
mathematical modeling, models can be used not only to demonstrate phenomena that are difficult to reproduce
in a learning environment, but also to interactively determine the degree of influence of certain parameters on a
simulated system or situation.</p>
      <p>As our studies show, in the practice of training future specialists, information modeling significantly increases
the level of knowledge acquisition, speeds up the process of the practical skills formation. This happens due to the
involvement of the subject in the process of modeling his imagination, which arises from the need to anticipate,
explain the incomprehensible, to have an impact on him. At the same time, imagination can be considered both
as a process and as a result of the reflection of objective reality. It is mediated by a certain target setting and
performs a heuristic (serves as a factor in search creative activity) and anticipating (anticipates forms of activity)
functions.</p>
      <p>To apply the method of information modeling in the educational process, it is necessary to know technologies
of working with information, which involves the use of spatial visibility, as well as its descriptive or sign forms
[Tyn03]. In turn, this requires the ability to see the unity of the properties of the object and the created model
in one of three aspects: structural, functional and informational. As our experience shows, the formation of
such skills most successfully takes place under conditions of visual learning, i.e. such a didactic process, which
is based on the extensive use of visibility and modeling in the educational and cognitive activity of students.</p>
      <p>The analysis of literary sources undertaken by us [Men2000], [Gui06], [Had04], [Bou18], [Geb18], devoted
to the problem of modeling, allows us to conclude that a number of theoretical issues have already received
sufficient justification. Among them: the possibilities of the method and the laws of its inclusion in cognitive
activity; methods and means of enhancing cognitive activity based on modeling; classification of models created
in the process of modeling and their practical value, etc. At the same time, the issues related to the information
modeling technology in the structure of students visual learning have not been studied enough.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Task</title>
      <p>Based on the analysis of the problem, the study set the following tasks: 1) to identify the didactic possibilities
of the information modeling method in the educational activities of students in conditions of visual learning;
2) to implement the process of mastering the technology of information modeling by students in the context of
future professional activities; 3) to experimentally prove the effectiveness of information modeling technology as
a method of improving the practice of teaching students in high school.
3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Development Of Methodology</title>
      <p>In determining the research methodology, we proceeded from the tasks. In this regard, first of all, it required an
refer to the method of logical analysis of scientific sources, in which judgments about concepts are presented
model, modeling, information modeling, information modeling technologies. The definitions of concepts presented
in them were considered by us as some completed structures. Such an approach was justified because it prepared
the ground for moving in the opposite direction - to synthesis, on the basis of which generalizations were made
and models were created, and didactic possibilities of information modeling were studied in providing students
with more productive learning activities with information in the context of visual learning.</p>
      <p>The solution of the research tasks was also connected with the method of ascent from the abstract to the
concrete, the specificity of which was the development by students of various types of information models and
endowing them with the properties of ideal images. Models were used as simulated objects:
at the empirical level:
- reconstructing (recreating the qualitative specificity of the object);
- measuring (obtaining quantitative characteristics of the object);
- descriptive (providing visibility and clarity);
at the theoretical level:
- interpretative (explanation, generalization, comprehensive description);
- predictive (predicting the behavior of the prototype object);
- criterion (verification of truth, the adequacy of knowledge about the object);
- heuristic (hypothetical representation of the object);
at a practical level:
- cognitive-illustrating;
- training.</p>
      <p>The process of information modeling itself was carried out on the basis of the pedagogical experiment method,
consisting of two stages - forming (conducted in the experimental group) and final (obtaining empirical data in
the experimental (EG) and control (CG) groups). The main method of obtaining empirical data was survey,
suggesting the respondents’ answers to specific tasks by means of reflexive thinking [Kib15], [Ris16], [Byrd17].
In this regard, the tasks were used to establish:
- the attitude of students to mastering the information modeling technology is the leading motive type;
- the degree of knowledge assimilation about the modeling method (cognitive component of IC; qualitative
and quantitative analysis);
- the degree of knowledge assimilation about the diversity models’ types and functions;
- the degree of students’ understanding of the information modeling technology role in the structure of future
professional activity;
- mastery of knowledge about information technologies and the skills to use them for processing information;
- the ability to create various types of models: informative, structural-logical, functional;
- the ability to use various types of graphical visibility in the process of information modeling.</p>
      <p>Tasks were given to the subjects in turn and performed them in writing. In assessing the results of the tasks,
an expert assessment was used, which did not allow subjectivity due to the fact that the expert had reference
standards.</p>
      <p>The study involved students from the 1-2 grades of the master’s program in the direction of \Pedagogical
education" from several institutes of the \North-Caucasian Federal University" . The total number of respondents
was 80 people.
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>The main results of the study, obtained on the basis of the survey-diagnostic method and comparative analysis,
are presented by us in the sequence as they were made available to experts.
4.1</p>
      <p>Students’ Attitude To Mastering Information Modeling Technology Is The Leading Type Of
Motive
A leading type of student motive was subjected by the study. For the study the task formulated in the form of
a question was used: "What is the most important for you in mastering information modeling technology?".</p>
      <p>Table 1: Comparative analysis of the motives of students mastering the information modeling technology, in
% of the total number</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>Respondent Assessing parameter</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>Possible use in the profession Desire to learn something new Attracts the possibility of realization</title>
        <p>Attracts the process of mastering
Broadens the mind
self</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-3">
        <title>Students in the ex</title>
        <p>perimental group</p>
        <p>Students in control group
1 grade
43,0
29,0
23,0</p>
        <p>From the materials of the table it follows that the choice of students in the experimental and control groups
differs significantly. Moreover, this difference is most significant for the second year of study. The motivation
function of the students in the experimental group by the end of training has increased significantly, whereas in
the control group the dynamics were not so significant.
4.2</p>
        <p>The Study Of The Degree Of Students’ Knowledge Assimilation About The Modeling
Method
Students performed three test tasks: 1) to distinguish: indicate which of the definitions reflects the essence of
the method; 2) to recognize: which of these features are related to information modeling; 3) to choose the correct
answer: from the set of named functions, select those that are peculiar to modeling.</p>
        <p>The criteria for evaluating the completed tasks were level characteristics:
- level a (low) - if the subject has performed correctly only one of the three tasks;
- level a (medium) – if the subject has completed two of the three tasks correctly;
- level a (high) - if the subject has completed all tasks correctly.</p>
        <p>Table 2: Analysis of students’ knowledge about the information modeling method, in%</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-4">
        <title>Respondent Assessing parameter Level «(low )</title>
        <p>The analysis of the data in the table shows that by the beginning of the study (1 grade), the high level of
students’ knowledge about information modeling in both groups was insignificant – 10.0% . At the end of the
formative experiment in the experimental group the quantitative data changed significantly. Thus, the indicator
"a-low level" was characterized by 12.0% (32.0% difference); the indicator "a - medium level" was found in
34.0% of respondents (12.0% difference); the indicator "a - high level" was set for 54.0% of respondents (44.0%
difference).</p>
        <p>In the control group, the indicator \ - low level" decreased, the other two indicators slightly increased:
(medium) level - the difference was 6.0% ; a (high) level - the difference was 4.0% . The best results in the
experimental group, in our opinion, were promoted by the purposeful use of visual learning and modeling
technologies.
4.3</p>
        <p>The Degree Of Student Knowledge Assimilation About The Diversity Models’ Types And
Functions
The study was conducted by testing method. Tests suggested tasks: the formulation of the definitions of the
concepts \modeling" and \model" ; on the enumeration of models types; on the listing of modeling functions
and models; the determination the sequence of actions in the simulation; the identification of visual learning
methods.</p>
        <p>The criteria for assessing the results of the tasks were indicators:
- level (low) - high degree of inaccuracies in all tasks;
- level a (medium) - insignificant degree of inaccuracies in all tasks;
- level a (high) - sufficient degree of accuracy in all completed tasks.</p>
        <p>Table 3: Analysis of students’ knowledge about the diversity models’ types and functions, in%</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-5">
        <title>Respondent Assessing parameter</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-6">
        <title>Level «(low )</title>
        <p>Level (medium)
Level (high)</p>
        <p>Total:
Students in the
experimental group
1 grade
54,0
40,0
6,0
100,0</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-7">
        <title>2 grade</title>
        <p>11,0
46,0
43,0
100,0
Students in control group
1 grade
51,0
43,0
6,0
100,0</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-8">
        <title>2 grade</title>
        <p>43,0
41,0
16,0
100,0</p>
        <p>Comparison of the data presented in the table allows to conclude that in the experimental group students’
knowledge compared with the beginning of the experiment changed not only quantitatively but also qualitatively.
For example, if at the beginning of the formative experiment a high degree of inaccuracies in the completed tasks
corresponded to 54.0% of respondents, by the end of the experiment the same indicator decreased by 43.0% .
The highest indicator was \ (high), amounting to 43.0% compared with the initial 6.0% . In the control group,
the dynamics in the students’ knowledge turned out to be insignificant. A factor in achieving higher results of
the experimental group by the end of training was undoubtedly the purposeful work of students in mastering
the modeling method in visual learning.
4.4</p>
        <p>The Degree Of Students’ Understanding Of the Information Modeling Technology Role In
The Structure Of Future Professional Activity
The following tasks were used for the study: 1) to identify the main components of the information modeling
technology; 2) to list the approaches to the study of information modeling technology; 4) to identify the main
properties of information modeling technology.</p>
        <p>The criteria for assessing the results of the tasks were indicators:
- level (low) - high degree of inaccuracies in all tasks;
- level a (medium) - insignificant degree of inaccuracies in all tasks;
- level a (high) - sufficient degree of accuracy in all completed tasks.</p>
        <p>Table 4: Analysis of students’ understanding of the information modeling technology role in the structure of
future professional activity, in%</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-9">
        <title>Respondent Assessing parameter Level «(low )</title>
        <p>Comparison of the table materials reveals a positive trend in the knowledge of students of both groups.
However, a sufficient degree of accuracy in all tasks performed in the experimental group was 25.0% higher than
in the control.</p>
        <p>The average level of the completed tasks, providing for the admissibility of minor inaccuracies, in the
experimental group was 55.0% , which is 11.0% higher compared to the control group. As for the results of performing
tasks at a high level, in the experimental group was 33.0% , and in the control - only 18.0% .
4.5</p>
        <p>Degree Of Mastering Students Knowledge About Information Technology And Skills To Use
Them For Information Processing
Students of the experimental and control groups performed the types of test tasks that allowed to establish the
degree of students’ knowledge of information technologies and skills of their use for processing information
- the level of students’ understanding of computer work and fast and accurate application of information
technology;</p>
        <p>- the level of ownership of performing activitiy, which requires the ability to use a variety of information
technologies in the implementation of logical, imaginative and mixed operations;</p>
        <p>- the level of ownership of constructive activity, which requires skills related to the modeling of content and
its presentation in a graphical version. par</p>
        <p>Analysis of the completed tasks results was carried out on the basis of the level characteristics:
- level a (low) - uses with great difficulty;
- level (medium) - owns with some difficulties;
- level a (high) - fluent in skills.</p>
        <p>Table 5: Analysis of students’ proficiency levels in the use of information technology in performing logical,
figurative and mixed operations, in%</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-10">
        <title>Fluent in skills owns with some difficulties uses with great difficulty Total:</title>
        <p>1 grade
32,0
40,0
28,0
100,0</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-11">
        <title>2 grade</title>
        <p>62,0
35,0
3,0
100,0
1 grade
34,0
41,0
25,0
100,0</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-12">
        <title>2 grade</title>
        <p>36,0
42,0
22,0
100,0</p>
        <p>Comparison of the data in the table shows that the level of students proficiency in the experimental group for
all indicators has changed towards improvement. So, if at the beginning of the formative experiment (1st grade),
weak knowledge of information technologies when performing various operations was typical of 32.0% of subjects
(in control, about the same result), then at the end of the experiment (2nd grade) this indicator changed almost
twice for the better and amounted to 62.0% . Similar changes occurred in other indicators, demonstrating that
we havechosen the right strategy and tactics of training. In the control group, the changes were insignificant in
all three indicators.
4.6</p>
        <p>Analysis Of The Students Readiness To Create Various Types Of Models
At the stage of the final experiment, the students’ knowledge of the skills for creating three types of models, the
most common in subject learning, was studied:
- informative (e.g., the creation of tables, charts, reference notes using signal-symbols);
- structural and logical (e.g., building an algorithm for actions when students perform practical work, the
sequence of a phenomenon or process);
- functional-logical (e.g., building a model of the intended didactic process). par
Evaluation of the work performed was carried out according to the following criteria and indicators:
- level (low) - uses skills with great difficulty;
- level (medium) - owns skills with some difficulties;
- level a (high) - fluent in skills.</p>
        <p>Table 6: Analysis of students’ readiness to create pedagogical models, in %</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-13">
        <title>Students in the ex</title>
        <p>perimental group</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-14">
        <title>Students in control group</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-15">
        <title>1 grade</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-16">
        <title>2 grade</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-17">
        <title>1 grade</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-18">
        <title>2 grade</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-19">
        <title>Informative models</title>
        <p>Respondent</p>
        <p>Assessing parameter</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-20">
        <title>Fluent in skill Owns skills with some difficulties Uses skills with great difficulty Total:</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-21">
        <title>Fluent in skill Owns skills with some difficulties Uses skills with great difficulty Total:</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-22">
        <title>Fluent in skills Owns skills with some difficulties Uses skills with great difficulty Total:</title>
        <p>22,0
34,0
44,0
100,0
19,0
41,0
40,0
100,0
14,0
20,0
66,0</p>
        <p>The materials in the table allow us to conclude that the students in the experimental group were more
prepared to work on the implementation of modeling. The vast majority of them mastered the necessary skills,
as evidenced by quantitative data.</p>
        <p>In the control group, although there were changes, they differ significantly from the results in the experimental
group.</p>
        <p>Students’ Readiness To Use Graphic Visibility In Professional Pedagogical Activity</p>
        <p>Comparison of the data presented in the table shows that by the beginning of the formative experiment, the
students’ readiness of both groups to use graphical visibility in relation to pedagogical activity was at a rather low
level. Conducting a formative experiment, dominated by the visual learning technology, has allowed to achieve
good performance in the knowledge and skills of the students in the experimental group.</p>
        <p>As for the learning outcomes in the control group, the changes between the beginning and the end of the
experiment were insignificant.
5</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>One of the most important higher education tasks is the quality of preparing students for their upcoming
professional activities. In solving this problem, an undoubted role is played by the work to improve the methods
and learning technologies. A special place among them is occupied by the information modeling technology.</p>
      <p>The study of objects and patterns, no matter how deep they reach, always requires visual reproduction, a
certain of their representability. Therefore, instead of the traditional form of visualization, modern science uses
imaginative mentally abstractly recreating properties of the object model. The model representation, on the one
hand, serves as a means of forming abstract knowledge of the subject, on the other hand, serves as a sensual
support of thought as it moves further towards a more in-depth knowledge of the object, towards new abstract
knowledge. The mental model helps to interpret the reflection in it of the theoretical knowledge essence in a new
concrete practical situation.</p>
      <p>Considering the information modeling issue, it should be borne in mind that its use in educational work has
a great didactic value, which ensures the accuracy of perception of the studied objects and empirical accuracy.</p>
      <p>The study found that any model created in the modeling course contains a certain amount of information. Its
mastering by a student takes place at the cognitive, emotional, axiological and behavioral levels.</p>
      <p>Considering the mastering information means, we, as one of them, single out the information modeling
technology, the use of which in the conditions of students visual learning provides:
- optimization the process of students professional development;
- development of the intellectual properties of the student’s personality;
- the development of research methods;
- formation of skills to solve complex, poorly formalized tasks.</p>
      <p>The process of mastering students of information modeling technology in learning should be presented in the
form of the following educational tasks:</p>
      <p>- mastering knowledge: about the features of information flows in the pedagogical field of activity; about
promising areas of development and use of information technologies means; about modeling technologies based
on electronic educational resources; about educational software;</p>
      <p>- mastering skills and abilities: using a computer and computer networks in analytical work with various
types of information; information presentation based on its coding in various ways; information modeling
implementation in real practice based on information technology; results analysis of the educational process using
spreadsheets; processing test control results, etc.</p>
      <p>In order the goal and objectives will work, it is necessary to create certain conditions due to which their
realization in the learning outcomes would occur. In the formative experiment, we chose as such:
- psychological conditions - the motivation of students’ conscious assimilation of information modeling
technology;</p>
      <p>- pedagogical conditions - intensification and optimization of the educational process through the involvement
of visual learning.</p>
      <p>The final stage of the study, the quantitative and qualitative data analysis confirmed the our position
correctness and revealed a significant change in the students learning outcomes in the experimental group compared to
the control.
[Pos89]</p>
      <p>D. A. Pospelov. Modeling reasoning: experience analysis of cognitive aspects. -M., 1989 184 p.</p>
      <p>E. S. Polat, M. Yu. Buharkina. Modern pedagogical and information technologies in the education
system, Academy. Moscow, 2007.
[Gor18] V. I Gorovaya, S. A. Khudoverdova. Technology of visual-model education in the information culture
formation // Problems of modern pedagogical education / Pedagogy and psychology. Collection of
Proceedings. Vol. 60. RIO GRA. Yalta. pp. 109-111, 2018.
[Dos17] B. Dosher, Z. I. Lu. Visual perceptual learning and models / annual review of vision science. Annual</p>
      <p>Reviews Inc. Vol. 3, pp. 343-363, 2017.</p>
      <p>T. G. Vezirov, R. J. Guseynov, E. S. Sultanov, R. M. Abdulgalimov, Y. V. Sorokopud Russian
experience of the unesco’s programs realization in the sphere of informatization of the pedagogical education
// Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia. 2014. T. 11. N 3. Pp. 1631-1638.
[Pan18] O. P. Pankratova, E. A. Konopko, R. M. Nemkov, O. S. Mezentseva. The preparation of a modern
computer science teacher with the help of resource-saving technologies and green it implementation //
Integrating Research Agendas and Devising Joint Challenges International Multidisciplinary
Symposium ICT Research in Russian Federation and Europe. 2018. Pp. 222-228.
[Zen18] S. V. Zenkina, O. P. Pankratova, E. A. Konopko, A.H. Ardeev. Model of organization of network
projectresearch students activities in collaboration with city-forming enterprises // Integrating Research
Agendas and Devising Joint Challenges International Multidisciplinary Symposium ICT Research in Russian
Federation and Europe. 2018. Pp. 290-296.
[Ris16]</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Kap82]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P. F.</given-names>
            <surname>Kapterev</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Selected pedagogical writings / by ed. A.
          <string-name>
            <surname>M. Arsenyev</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Moscow,
          <year>1982</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Min86]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E. G.</given-names>
            <surname>Mingazov</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>About two forms of visualization in school practice</article-title>
          // New research in
          <source>pedagogical sciences, Moscow</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>78</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>93</lpage>
          ,
          <year>1986</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Nov68]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I. B.</given-names>
            <surname>Novik</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. I.</given-names>
            <surname>Uemov</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Modeling and analogy // Materialistic dialectics and
          <source>methods of natural Sciences, Moscow</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>257</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>258</lpage>
          ,
          <year>1968</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Gor09]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.I</given-names>
            <surname>Gorovaya</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Modeling of the learning process at the university in the system of multi-level education // Modernization of the system of continuous education: Materials of the international scientific-practical conference</article-title>
          , Makhachkala, pp.
          <fpage>63</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>67</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2009</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Tyn03]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Yu. S.</given-names>
            <surname>Tynnikov</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Method of study: methodological analysis of the didactic categories</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Sochi</source>
          .
          <year>2003</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Men2000]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Menon</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Preface.
          <source>In Emerging Communication Technologies and the Society. Indian National Science Academy. New Delhi</source>
          ,
          <year>2000</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>[Gui06] Guidelines on Information Literacy for Lifelong Learning</article-title>
          . - http://www.ifla.org/V/s42/pub/ILGuidelines2006.pdf .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Had04]
          <article-title>Haddon. Information and Communication Technologies in Everyday Life: A Concise Introduction</article-title>
          and Research Guide, Berg, Oxford,
          <year>2004</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Bou18]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Boumiza</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Bekiarski</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Pleshkova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Souilem</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Development of Simulation Models for Interactive Audiovisual Control of Students in the E-Learning Environment // International Conference on High Technology for Sustainable Development</article-title>
          . Proceedings, HiTech,
          <year>2018</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Geb18]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Gebre</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Learning with multiple representations: Infographics as cognitive tools for authentic learning in science literacy [Apprendre avec des représentations multiples: L'infographie de presse comme outil cognitif pour l'apprentissage authentique en science] //</article-title>
          <source>Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology</source>
          ,
          <volume>44</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ), 24 p.,
          <year>2018</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>