<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Enhancing Teachers' Computational Thinking Skills Through Game Based Learning</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Nataša Hoić-Božić</string-name>
          <email>natasah@inf.uniri.hr</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Jasminka Mezak</string-name>
          <email>jasminka@uniri.hr</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Krešo Tomljenović</string-name>
          <email>kreso.tomljenovic@ufzg.hr</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Faculty of Teacher, Education</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Rijeka</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="HR">Croatia</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Faculty of Teacher, Education</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Zagreb</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="HR">Croatia</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>University of Rijeka, Department of Informatics</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Rijeka</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="HR">Croatia</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2019</year>
      </pub-date>
      <fpage>20</fpage>
      <lpage>23</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Computational thinking is a concept which involves formulating and solving problems in a way computer would do it, though not necessarily with the help of a computer. It is considered to be the necessary skill for successful functioning in the technology driven society of the 21st century, therefore it is important to integrate it into the education system. Since the role of the teacher in that context is important, the paper considers activities in the development of computational thinking of pre-service and in-service teachers, especially through game based learning. Two projects that explore this topic are presented: the Erasmus+ project GLAT and the Digital games project.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>working with these students. For example, of 27 published papers about CT promotion from July of 2015 to
April of 2016, only 3 studies are targeted at lower primary school age and teachers as aimed groups of research
[deA16].</p>
      <p>This paper focuses on the promotion of teacher’s CT, both future teachers and teachers already participating
in the teaching process (pre-service and in-service teachers). The activities that have started within the Erasmus+
project GLAT - Games for Learning Algorithmic Thinking and have continued within the UNIRI project Digital
games in the context of learning, teaching and promoting inclusive education are presented. One of the projects’
objectives is to encourage the integration of CT into the daily teaching of different subjects in the lower grades
of primary school using game based learning (GBL). This research will include the design of a model for CT
teacher education so that in their future work teachers could stimulate among their students important concepts
that CT includes.</p>
      <p>The paper is organized as follows: the second chapter provides some of the CT definitions, concepts, and
models. The third chapter brings brief description of Game Based Learning (GBL) and Scratch Tool. The
fourth chapter deals more closely with CT in the context of teacher education, with reference to the Croatian
education system and the new curriculum. Next, there are chapters featuring projects activities: the fifth chapter
presents Games for Learning Algorithmic Thinking (GLAT) project which ends in 2019 and the sixth chapter
presents the project Digital games in the context of learning, teaching and promoting inclusive education (Digital
Games) which begun in 2019, partly as a continuation of the GLAT project. At the end of the paper, the last
chapter points out the main conclusions.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Computational Thinking (CT)</title>
      <p>CT covers a wide range of features so there is no unambiguous definition of it. The CT definition is often the
set of skills it consists of. Most of the authors agree that CT is a set of fundamental skills for everyone, not
just computer scientists; it is a thought activity of formulating and solving problems in the way computers do
it. Thereby the problem solving process does not necessarily involve computers themselves [Cun10].</p>
      <p>A more extensive definition is given by C. Selby and J. Woollard in which the CT is referred to as "a focused
approach to problem solving, incorporating thought processes that utilize abstraction, decomposition, algorithmic
design, evaluation, and generalizations [Sel13].</p>
      <p>Even more complete CT definition is formulated in the Computational Thinking Toolkit publication from 2010.
Organized by the National Science Foundation (NSF), the International Society for Technology in Education
(ISTE) and the Computer Science Teachers Association (CSTA) from USA, by the synergy of a large number of
leading education scientists, teachers and computer scientists, the operational CT definition is produced [Com10]:</p>
      <p>Computational thinking (CT) is a problem-solving process that includes (but is not limited to) the following
characteristics:
- Formulating problems in a way that enables us to use a computer and other tools to help solve them
- Logically organizing and analyzing data
- Representing data through abstractions such as models and simulations
- Automating solutions through algorithmic thinking (a series of ordered steps)
- Identifying, analyzing, and implementing possible solutions with the goal of achieving the most efficient and
effective combination of steps and resources
- Generalizing and transferring this problem solving process to a wide variety of problems.</p>
      <p>Further, the publication states number of dispositions or attitudes that are essential dimensions of CT, which
include:
- Confidence in dealing with complexity
- Persistence in working with difficult problems
- Tolerance for ambiguity
- The ability to deal with open-ended problems
- The ability to communicate and work with others to achieve a common goal or solution
The broad domains to which the CT relates implies that the research is limited to individual CT elements.
The authors offer different models trying to classify the aspects of CT on the essential components. The Aspects
of CT most commonly analyzed and found in the literature as fundamental are decomposition, abstraction,
algorithms, debugging, iteration and generalization [Shu17]. Then the research is designed in such a way that
the targeted aspect of the CT can be evaluated.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Game Based Learning (GBL)</title>
      <p>While playing games children demonstrate many CT qualities [Lee12]. In the early years of schooling (preschool
up to 4th grade), children are still motivated to learn because they experience it more like a game and not a
commitment. At that time, while their interest is still forming, it is important to focus their learning process in
a way that promotes CT. The GBL approach to learning more demanding content at children retains a sense of
play rather than a coercion, which is in line with contemporary theories of learning [Wu12].</p>
      <p>Game based learning is a newer theory of learning, accepted as motivating for students, but there is a difference
between playing games and building the game itself. In the latter case student’s motivation is higher and the
learning process is more efficient [Vos11].</p>
      <p>Although there are a number of researches on GBL, this area is still relatively new, especially in the context
of Croatian education. In order to increase motivation, efficiency, interest and engagement of students, there is
a necessity to propose an innovative way of using GBL principles in Croatian education system.</p>
      <p>An example of a very popular tool for programming and algorithmic thinking indirect learning is Scratch
[Scr19]. The tool is created by the Lifelong Kindergarten Group, the MIT Media Lab. All contents are free for
sharing, exploring, and upgrading. Scratch is very easy to use thus suitable for the younger students, offering
a significant environment for development creativity, systematicity and cooperativity. Using Scratch, students
design their stories, games, animations, and simulations by matching the already programmed code blocks as if
they fit Lego dice [Res09].</p>
      <p>Scratch is a suitable environment for the constructivist aspect of GBL, suitable for lower grades students and
the development of programming concepts through game design [Wil13].</p>
      <p>Based on the Scratch activities, Brennan and Resnick have formed a highly cited and accepted CT model
[Bre12]. In their model, CT aspects are divided into three dimensions:
- Computational concepts (the concepts designers employ as they program): sequences,loops, parallelism,
events, conditionals, operators, and data
- Computational practices (the practices designers develop as they program): being incremental and iterative,
testing and debugging, reusing and remixing, and abstracting and modularizing
- Computational perspectives (the perspectives designers form about the world around them and about
themselves): expressing, connecting and questioning</p>
      <p>Scratch is represented in the curriculum of Faculties of Teacher Education in Croatia, as a part of education
program for future teachers. It is also represented in the GLAT project presented in this paper.</p>
      <p>There are a whole range of tools like Scratch, all represented in the educational process of different subjects.
GBL is thus imposed as a natural medium for promoting concepts and ideas of CT.
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>CT and Teacher Education</title>
      <p>Given the interdisciplinarity of primary school junior grade teachers, which are expected to be educated in all
subjects, good teacher education is one of the crucial factors in the promotion of CT in the lower grades of
elementary school [Adl18].</p>
      <p>CT aspects can be taught in a series of school subjects, should not be related solely to math, computer science
or natural science subjects. Yadav et al. conducted workshop based research about CT understanding of future
teachers. After the completed workshop, the results indicates that future teachers in general are considering
CT as integrating technology into teaching, while the experimental group has realized CT as a problem-solving
approach, universally applicable in teaching and not related just to technology [Yad17].</p>
      <p>Instead of focusing on the application of new technologies, the education of future teachers at universities
should concentrate on the acquisition of skills and competences that characterize the CT as part of its primary
profession and methodology courses, which can easily be applied to novelties in technology [Yad14]. Yadav et al.
suggest that the education of future teachers should include co-operation with information science specialists, in
order to incorporate core CT quality into pedagogical and methods course education. They suggest that such
education should take into account the following components [Yad17]:</p>
      <p>Curriculum. Develop a pre-service teacher education curriculum to prepare teachers to embed computational
thinking in their classrooms.</p>
      <p>Core ideas. Introduce pre-service teachers to core ideas of computational thinking by redesigning educational
technology courses.</p>
      <p>Methods courses. Use elementary and secondary methods courses to develop pre-service teachers’
understanding of computational thinking in the context of the discipline.</p>
      <p>Collaboration. Computer science educators and teacher educators collaborate on developing computational
thinking curricula that goes beyond programming.</p>
      <p>Teacher education. Use existing resources and curriculum standards to assimilate computational thinking into
pre-service teacher education.</p>
      <p>Teacher education should not end at formal education during the study. Apart from the fact that study
programs are often obsolete or the process of redesigning syllabuses is too slow, the very speed of change in
information communication technologies requires continuous teacher education.</p>
      <p>A positive thing is the availability of a large number of tools and resources available for free use in teaching,
free to use, upgrade and further share. Lockwood and Mooney in the 2017 review [Loc17] list over 50 different
tools, software, programming languages, etc., which were the foundation of CT research in education. That the
number is constantly increasing as well as the free sharing and usage facilities based on these tools. There is also
a positive enthusiasm of a large number of teachers, scientists, and private technology companies to make their
work massively available for better education and popularization of CT.</p>
      <p>The Croatian educational system is currently implementing an experimental phase of curricular reform [Nac19]
named \School for life" , which places emphasis on acquiring knowledge, developing ability and willingness
of students to solve problems, making decisions, metacognition, critical thinking, creativity and innovation.
Students should also be enabled for communication, collaboration, information and digital literacy and the use
of technology. The advantage of the game as a natural activity of children which implies the importance of using
the GBL especially in the lowest grades is stressed as well.</p>
      <p>However, up to now, not sufficient attention is being paid to the development of CT in education for future
teachers in their formal education. There are not enough appropriate courses that introduce CT in study
programs for future primary junior grade teachers, and not enough courses within which models such as Game
Based Learning into teaching could be implemented. Mostly there are implemented as elective courses e.g. one
of the elective courses in the Graduate study of primary school education is "Extracurricular Informatics and
Technical Activities" at Faculty of Teacher Education, University of Rijeka. The situation is similar in most
study programs for teachers across Europe which was one of the reasons for connecting experts from different
EU countries and starting a project which deals with these issues.
5</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Project GLAT - Education for Teachers</title>
      <p>One of the projects about enhancing teachers’ CT skills and teaching them applying CT concepts with their
students is Erasmus+ project GLAT - Games for Learning Algorithmic Thinking [Gla19]. The general goal of
the project is development of algorithmic thinking of younger students which will improve students’ attitudes
towards coding and increasing students’ interest in the selection of future career in the ICT and STEM areas.
Main objective is encouraging the integration of computational and algorithmic thinking, problem-solving skills,
logic and creativity into the daily teaching through different subjects in students’ younger ages in a fun and
attractive way.</p>
      <p>Partners are European experts in the field of didactics of informatics, e-learning, and game-based learning
from Croatia, Estonia, Slovenia, Macedonia and Bulgaria. The direct participants are Croatian primary school
junior grade teachers and the most important project activities include professional development for teachers
using workshops where they are introduced to innovative methods for teaching in the field of ICT.</p>
      <p>In the context of the project, syllabus and learning materials for blended learning model of education for
primary school junior grade teachers are developed. Learning outcomes are related to innovative teaching
methodologies and tools such as: Problem Based Learning (PBL), Inquiry Based Learning (IBL), Game Based Learning
(GBL), use of Web 2.0 tools for creating content for unplugged activities, creating logical tasks and online quizzes,
games and tools for learning basics of programming.</p>
      <p>Teachers were introduced to the learning management system Moodle and provided with access to the
ecourse "Games for Learning Algorithmic Thinking". Within this e-course, teachers access all learning materials,
communicate with project experts, submit created learning scenarios, and share their impressions regarding
implementation of learning scenarios in classroom with other participants.</p>
      <p>The most important part of GLAT education are 3-day workshops for focus group of about 20 teachers (Figure
1) for f2f part of a total of 48 hours [Hoi18].</p>
      <p>The goal of the first workshop was to introduce the participants to the concepts and examples of GBL
and game-based unplugged activities (activities that take place in the classroom without using a computer) for
algorithmic thinking as well as tools for creating content for unplugged activities and designing learning scenarios.</p>
      <p>After the second workshop teachers have been able to describe principles of PBL and teamwork, use Web 2.0
tools for creating logical tasks and online quizzes, apply digital didactic games into different school subjects, and
create learning scenarios to develop innovative ideas for carrying out logical tasks and online quizzes (Figure 2).</p>
      <p>The third workshop was related to IBL as well as learning CT and basic programming concepts using games
and game-based tools. During the workshop, participants attended lectures, demonstrations, and practical work.
Through individual and group activities, they analyzed and use games and tools for learning programming like
Run Marco!, Code.org, Blockly Games, and Scratch – a block-based visual programming language by which
students can program their interactive stories, games, and animations (Figure 3). Participants have also learned
how to apply the micro:bit for encouraging algorithmic thinking.</p>
      <p>During the GLAT workshops, attendants have learned how to prepare learning scenarios: documents in which
the teacher develops innovative ideas to carry out educational activities by means of modern teaching methods
with the use of appropriate digital content and tools. The most important elements of the scenarios are the
learning outcomes and the activities for their realization by using contemporary teaching and learning methods
and digital tools [Car17].</p>
      <p>After each workshop teachers have started designing their own learning scenarios, with the help of mentors
experts from the project team. The main goal of these scenarios is encouraging algorithmic and computational
thinking of students as preparation for later learning of coding. Besides the textual form of the scenario (Figure
4), teachers are supposed to design graphical form using the LePlanner tool [Hoi16]. Final versions of scenarios
have been implemented in the classroom with the students from 1st to 4th grades of primary school.
An evaluation was conducted after each workshop with aim to establish how participants were satisfied with
the workshop content and lecturers. The evaluation in a form of an anonymous survey consisted of first part
with Likert scale-based statements and second part with open ended questions. In the first part participants
were asked to express their opinions on the applicability of the statement to the workshop using the Likert scale,
where 1 refers to \extremely poor" to 5 - \exquisitely" . In open ended questions in the second part, participants
were asked to mention the topics for which they considered to be of most use in their job in school (the value of
education), and to give some suggestions and proposals for the improvement of the workshops.</p>
      <p>The survey was completed by 24, 22 and 19 participants respectively per each workshop which is 65
questionnaires overall for the whole education. As shown on Figure 5 participants highly evaluated six of eight
items: the contemporary (up-to-date) content, importance of a workshop for personal professional development,
communication and collaboration within a group, preparedness of lecturers, an opportunity to express their own
opinions and general evaluation of the workshop. It is significant that all above mentioned statements had high
marks (above 4,7) for each workshop separately.</p>
      <p>Generally, looking at the entire education of teachers trough three workshops, participants highly evaluated
all statements with means’ value above 4,55 as shown in Table 2. Only two statements overall had standard
deviation over 0,5.
01 Applicability of the topics in practical work
02 The contemporary (up-to-date) content
03 Importance for professional development
04 Communication and collaboration within a
group
05 Clarity of presentation
06 Preparedness of lecturers / workshop leaders
07 An opportunity to express our own opinions
08 General evaluation of the workshop</p>
      <p>The second part with open ended question confirmed the satisfaction of participants. As the value of education,
participants emphasized contemporary topics, applicability of presented topics, unique education opportunity,
very good organization and preparedness of lecturers, great communication and collaboration with lecturers and
colleagues. To point out some of the comments:</p>
      <p>„I would emphasize the value of teaching about the use of digital tools; we use them more and more in teaching,
especially in the experimental program of curricular reform “School for life”.“</p>
      <p>„Getting acquainted with new ways of learning that is much more interesting to children because it includes
what is close to them, namely, the games and technology. “</p>
      <p>„Excellent preparation and expertise of lecturers, the ability to develop creativity, encourage to continuous
participation and learning, interesting content, pleasant lecturers, very responsive. Excellent education! Thank
you¡‘</p>
      <p>There were not many suggestions and proposals for the improvement of the education. After the first workshop
titled “Game based learning and unplugged activities” there was no suggestions at all, probably because teachers
were familiar with topics in general. The last two workshop were more demanding for teachers because they
were not familiar enough with digital tools that can be used in classroom, so they stated that there were too
many tools to upskill. The comments were:
“More time for a particular application. More details on using a particular tool.”
„The pace of presenting new content is too rapid. “</p>
      <p>As presumed, our participants had no additional prior knowledge about using and implementing digital tools
and game-based tools for learning programming concepts, so they found these tasks demanding.</p>
      <p>The teachers will apply their work with students from 1st to 4th grade, and afterwards a more detailed
evaluation follows. The interviews and questionnaire will also be prepared for students who took part in testing
of the learning scenarios. All results and collected data will be used for improving the GLAT syllabus and
teaching materials for formal and non-formal teacher training programs as well as for further research efforts
about improvement of the CT education model for primary junior grade teachers in the context of the new
project “Digital games”.
6</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Future plans – project “Digital games”</title>
      <p>The above-described research started under the Erasmus+ GLAT project will continue in the University of
Rijeka’s scientific project Digital games – “Digital games in the context of learning, teaching and promoting
inclusive education” . The project started in January 2019 and lasts for three years.</p>
      <p>The purpose of the project is to explore the possibilities of using digital games to improve the quality of
learning, teaching and promoting inclusive education, and the development and promotion of contemporary
pedagogical-technological frameworks for the use of GBL in schools. The project will cover activities that
correspond to specific research objectives, which are the selection and development of games and digital tools, as
well as modern teaching models for building the GBL frameworks, and the designing of learning scenarios based
on developed frameworks applicable in practice for learning and teaching subjects in primary schools.</p>
      <p>Several studies based on the principles of GBL will begin in the context of the project. One of the studies is
about encouraging the integration of computational thinking into the daily teaching of different subjects in the
lower grades of primary school using GBL, which will stimulate creativity, logical thinking and problem-solving
skills among students. In the context of this study, special attention will be given to the development of CT
education models for future K-4 teachers to enable the transfer of CT knowledge and skills to their students.</p>
      <p>Within the aforementioned study, based on GLAT project results, additional analysis of relevant research and
the existing situation in schools, project members will select and develop games and digital tools and appropriate
learning models to build pedagogical-technological frameworks based on GBL to educate the teachers for CT.
The collaboration will be established with students - future teachers as well as teachers in schools with the help
of which learning scenarios and CT learning materials will be built.</p>
      <p>The research will use the Design Based Research (DBR) approach [Wan05] which represents a systematic
but flexible methodology for research to improve the educational practice through iterative analysis, design,
development and implementation based on co-operation between researchers and teachers-practitioners. DBR
iteratively designs a learning model which is tested in a natural environment and revised after testing as many
times it takes. The basic advantage of DBR in relation to the classical experiment is implementation in a real
environment, not in conditions isolated from everyday life.</p>
      <p>In order to ensure a balance between existing practice and pedagogical and technological innovations, the
role of the teachers in the schools will be important. Quantitative (the software tools event logs, test results,
surveys ...) and qualitative data (conversations with teachers and students, observation of class interaction and
video analysis, analysis of student activities ...) will be collected during the research to evaluate developed
pedagogical-technological frameworks for GBL application.</p>
      <p>Design based research (DBR) will include improvement of existing e-learning models for learning CT by
introducing GBL and gamification through learning resources with digital games, puzzles, logical tasks and
similar elements for encouraging learning (technological aspect) and the contemporary learning and teaching
strategies that place students in the center of the educational process (pedagogical aspect).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>The technology-pervasive modern society, the rapid advancement of ICT, and the new learning strategies are
usually seen as a challenge in educating the new-coming generations of students. This is a complex task for
teachers who are expected to successfully teach these upcoming generations. More than ever, teachers must be
students themselves, be educated on a continuous basis and keep up to date with contemporary tendencies.</p>
      <p>Technological aspect of learning needs teacher to be an expert in 21st century skills with the ability to choose
appropriate activities and digital tools for their students. This also includes enhancing teachers’ CT skills and
teaching them how to apply CT concepts with their students.</p>
      <p>On the other hand, pedagogical aspect refers to be good methodological expert in order to encourage multiple
strategies to foster qualitative discussion and better learning. Teachers need to be flexible with managing new
classroom dynamics and be willing to adapt their teaching styles to accommodate new pedagogical approaches
to learning such as PBL, IBL, and GBL.</p>
      <p>These two aspects require flexible education system as well as personal effort of teachers to communicate
and collaborate with each other and with students. For the above to occur, teachers will need professional
development opportunities and strong support systems.</p>
      <p>This paper presents activities in the promotion of teachers’ CT skills based on recent pedagogical methods
and contemporary digital tools. Through project GLAT, based on game-based learning approaches, primary
school junior grade teachers are educated in developing their own teaching materials that are then applied in
class. The GLAT project results demonstrated the participants’ satisfaction with the use of digital tools to
promote CT skills, communication and collaboration is established. The main project results will consist of
syllabus of workshops with the materials for learning in Croatian and English language, complemented by the
examples of best practices, and available at online platform for e-learning. Syllabus will be used in the future
for the organization of a program of professional development of teachers, course or similar forms of education
in Croatia, partner countries and beyond.</p>
      <p>In the context of the new project Digital Games, efforts on building pedagogical-technological frameworks
based on GBL to educate the teachers for CT will continue.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>Acknowledgment</title>
      <p>The research has been co-funded by the Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union under the project „Games
for Learning Algorithmic Thinking“ (2017-1-HR01-KA201-035362) and by University of Rijeka (Croatia) under
the project “Digital games in the context of learning, teaching, and promoting inclusive education”
(uniri-drustv18-130).
[Adl18]</p>
      <p>Adler, R. F., &amp; Kim, H. (2018). Enhancing future K-8 teachers’ computational thinking skills through
modeling and simulations. Education and Information Technologies, 23 (4), 1501–1514.
[Car17] CARNet. (2017). Retrieved March 19, 2019, from
https://edutorij.e-skole.hr/share/page/scenarijipoucavanja
[Com10] Computational thinking for all j ISTE. (2010). Retrieved
https://www.iste.org/explore/Solutions/Computational-thinking-for-all</p>
      <sec id="sec-8-1">
        <title>March</title>
        <p>11,
2019,
from
[Cun10] Cuny, J., Snyder, L., &amp; Wing, J. M. (2010). Demystifying computational thinking for non-computer
scientists. Unpublished Manuscript in Progress, Referenced in Http://Www. Cs. Cmu. Edu/
CompThink/Resources/TheLinkWing. Pdf.
[deA16] de Araujo, A. L. S. O., Andrade, W. L., &amp; Guerrero, D. D. S. (2016). A systematic mapping study on
assessing computational thinking abilities. In 2016 IEEE frontiers in education conference (FIE) (pp.
1–9). IEEE.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-2">
        <title>GLAT project. (2019). Retrieved February 23, 2019, from https://glat.uniri.hr/ [Hoi18] Hoić-Božić, N., Dlab, M. H., Prskalo, L. N., Rugelj, J., &amp; Šerbec, I. N. (2018). Games for Learning</title>
        <p>Algorithmic Thinking–GLAT Project. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 4 (2), 73–95.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Hoi16]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hoić-Božić</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Laanpere</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pata</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Franković</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Teder</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Introducing inquiry-based learning to Estonian teachers: Experiences from the Creative Classroom project</article-title>
          .
          <source>In 2016 39th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO)</source>
          (pp.
          <fpage>1010</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1015</lpage>
          ). IEEE.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Lee12]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T. Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mauriello</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ingraham</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sopan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ahn</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bederson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B. B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          ).
          <article-title>CTArcade: learning computational thinking while training virtual characters through game play</article-title>
          .
          <source>In CHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems</source>
          (pp.
          <fpage>2309</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2314</lpage>
          ). ACM.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Loc17]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lockwood</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mooney</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Computational Thinking in Education: Where does it fit? A systematic literary review</article-title>
          .
          <source>ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1703</source>
          .
          <fpage>07659</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Nac19]
          <article-title>Nacionalni kurikulum j Ministarstvo znanosti i obrazovanja</article-title>
          . (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <source>Retrieved March</source>
          <volume>11</volume>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          , from https://mzo.hr/hr/rubrike/nacionalni-kurikulum
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Res09]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Resnick</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Silverman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kafai</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Maloney</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Monroy-Hernández</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rusk</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , : : : Silver,
          <string-name>
            <surname>J.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Scratch: programming for all</article-title>
          .
          <source>Communications of the ACM</source>
          ,
          <volume>52</volume>
          (
          <issue>11</issue>
          ),
          <volume>60</volume>
          . https://doi.org/10.1145/1592761.1592779
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>[Scr19] Scratch - Imagine</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Program, Share. (n.d.).
          <source>Retrieved February 25</source>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          , from https://scratch.mit.edu/
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Sel13]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Selby</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Woollard</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Computational thinking: the developing definition</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Shu17]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shute</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sun</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Asbell-Clarke</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Demystifying computational thinking</article-title>
          .
          <source>Educational Research Review</source>
          ,
          <volume>22</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>142</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>158</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Vos11]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Van Der Meijden</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Denessen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Effects of constructing versus playing an educational game on student motivation and deep learning strategy use</article-title>
          .
          <source>Computers &amp; Education</source>
          ,
          <volume>56</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>127</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>137</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Wan05]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hannafin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments</article-title>
          .
          <source>Educational Technology Research and Development</source>
          ,
          <volume>53</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>5</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>23</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Wil13] Wilson,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Hainey</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            , &amp;
            <surname>Connolly</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>T. M.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Using Scratch with primary school children: an evaluation of games constructed to gauge understanding of programming concepts</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Journal of Game-Based Learning (IJGBL)</source>
          ,
          <volume>3</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>93</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>109</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Win06]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wing</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Computational thinking</article-title>
          .
          <source>Communications of the ACM</source>
          ,
          <volume>49</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ), 33. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>[Wu12] Wu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.-H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hsiao</surname>
          </string-name>
          , H.-C.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.-L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.-H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Huang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.-H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Investigating the learningtheory foundations of game-based learning: a meta-analysis</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Computer Assisted Learning</source>
          ,
          <volume>28</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>265</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>279</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Yad17]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yadav</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gretter</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Good</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>McLean</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Computational thinking in teacher education</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Emerging research, practice, and policy on computational thinking</source>
          (pp.
          <fpage>205</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>220</lpage>
          ). Springer.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Yad14]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yadav</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mayfield</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhou</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hambrusch</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Korb</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education</article-title>
          .
          <source>ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE)</source>
          ,
          <volume>14</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>5</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [Yad17]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yadav</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stephenson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hong</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Computational thinking for teacher education</article-title>
          .
          <source>Communications of the ACM</source>
          ,
          <volume>60</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>55</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>62</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1145/2994591
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>