=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-2524/paper23
|storemode=property
|title=Emotion dysregulation and adolescents’ preference for online social interactions: the moderating role of gender
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2524/paper23.pdf
|volume=Vol-2524
|authors=Francesca Gioia,Valentina Boursier
|dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/psychobit/GioiaB19
}}
==Emotion dysregulation and adolescents’ preference for online social interactions: the moderating role of gender==
https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2524/paper23.pdf
Emotion dysregulation and adolescents’ preference for
online social interactions: The moderating role of gender
Francesca Gioia1[0000-0002-9264-3390] and Valentina Boursier1[0000-0003-0899-8090]
1
Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II
valentina.boursier@unina.it
Abstract. The number of young social media users is increasing year after year,
animating the scholar debate about excessive Internet use and its effects. Boys
and girls’ different social media use motives and purposes might reflect the way
in which they display their emotions, indeed increasing attention has been paid
to emotion dysregulation role in addictive behaviors. This study aimed at explor-
ing the moderating role of gender on the relation between difficulties in emotion
regulation and problematic preference for online social interactions. 693 Italian
adolescents (55% female and 45% male; mean age = 16+1.597) were involved in
the study. Results showed that gender differently moderated the relationship be-
tween emotion dysregulation and preference for web-mediated interactions in
males and females: girls with higher difficulties in regulation of emotional states
did not prefer online social interactions. On the contrary, boys’ problematic pref-
erence for web-mediated interactions always increased for difficulties in ac-
ceptance, understanding, control, and modulating negative emotions.
Keywords: Emotion Regulation, Problematic Social Network sites Use, Ado-
lescence, Gender.
1 Introduction
Web-based communication via social networking sites (SNSs) is growing fast among
adolescents. Indeed, among younger Internet users, 97% of teenagers and 99% of young
adults are web users [1,2]. Social media use seems to provide a useful online medium,
contributing to self-definition, identity construction, and development of social skills
[3,4,5,6,7,42,43]. At the same time, teens’ widespread Internet use seems to offer boys
and girls risky opportunities [8,9]. The emergence of possible abuse symptoms, espe-
cially in adolescence, constantly animates the scholar debate about the excessive Inter-
net use effects and the validity of the umbrella term “Internet addiction” (IA) [6,10,11],
and in recent years increasing attention has been paid to emotion dysregulation role in
addict1ive behaviors [12,13,14,15].
In 2004 Gratz and Roemer [16] defined emotion regulation as the awareness, under-
standing, acceptance, and modulation of own emotional states and some studies
Copyright © 2019 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
2
suggested that these abilities play a major role in inhibiting addictive behaviors, other-
wise engaging to escape from or minimize negative moods [12,13,17]. In problematic
Internet use (PIU) research field, studies suggested significant associations between
web-related activities to manage emotions, uncontrolled Internet use, and negative out-
comes of Internet use [12,17,18,19,20,21]. But, these findings highly support the asso-
ciation between difficulties in emotion regulation and PIU in adults. Indeed, although
some papers pointed out the pivotal role of improvement of recognition and regulation
of emotions abilities in adolescents’ PIU and Internet gaming disorder treatments
[22,23,24,25], still little is known about the link between emotion dysregulation and
Internet-related activities in boys and girls.
After the feminization of the web [26], females have become increasingly more engaged
on the Internet and, despite similarities, their motives of use were different from those
of boys [27]. Overall, girls seem to prefer social and communication activities (i.e so-
cial networking, instant messaging, blogging, photo-sharing) [27,28,29,30], whereas
males spent more time surfing, online videogaming, visiting pornographic sites, and
file downloading [9,28,31]. Likely, the girls’ expressive social media use for social
purposes and the instrumental Internet use for non-social purposes [32,33] reflect the
way in which adolescents are asked to display their emotions: girls in an expressive
way talking about their feelings with others, and boys in a more physical way [17].
However, despite the typical lower capability of self-control and emotion regulation in
both boys and girls during the adolescence [9], females seem to display greater aware-
ness of their emotions, ability to describe emotional experiences, and more emotional
regulation strategies than males [9,17,34,35,36].
2 Current study
The main goal of this study was to explore the links between adolescents’ difficulties
in emotion regulation and their preference for online social interactions, as a problem-
atic aspect of Social Network sites (SNS) use, highlighting possible gender-related dif-
ferences. Based on the literature reviewed, it was hypothesized that gender moderate
the predictive role of difficulties in emotion regulation on problematic preference for
web-mediated interactions.
3 Methods
3.1 Participants
A total of 693 Italian high-school students (55% female and 45% male; mean age =
16+1.597) were involved. General information about the aim of the study was an-
nounced in class. Participants were informed that participation was voluntary, and all
students agreed to participate and completed the questionnaires in a classroom setting
through their smartphones. No course credits or remunerative rewards were given.
3
3.2 Measures
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). The DERS [16] is a 36-items
measure rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (“almost never”) to 5 (“almost
always”). This measure was developed to clinically assess difficulties in emotion reg-
ulation scored on six scales: Nonacceptance of emotional responses
(NOACCEPTANCE); Difficulties engaging in goal-directed behavior (GOALS); Im-
pulse control difficulties due to negative emotions (IMPULSE); Lack of emotional
awareness (AWARENESS); Limited access to emotion regulation strategies
(STRATEGIES); and Lack of emotional clarity (CLARITY). The Italian adaptation of
the DERS [37] has good psychometric properties. In the current study, the Cronbach's
alpha was α= .881.
Preference for Online Social Interactions Sub-Scale (POSI). The POSI is a sub-
scale of the Generalized Problematic Internet Use 2 (GPIUS2; [19]). It measures the
degree to which individuals prefer the online communicative context on a scale ranging
from 1 (“strongly disagree”) to 8 (“strongly agree”). According to Casale and Fio-
ravanti [38], the participants were asked of referring only to their use of SNS. In the
current study the Cronbach's alpha was α= .694.
3.3 Data Analysis
Means, standard deviations, and Pearson’s correlations between the study variables
were performed (Table 1). Preliminary analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were also run
in IBM SPSS 23 to point out possible gender-related differences in considered dimen-
sions. ANOVAs revealed a significant effect of gender on GOALS [F(1,692)=28.707;
p=<.001]; IMPULSE [F(1,692)=10.801; p=.001]; CLARITY [F(1,692)=9.203; p=.003]; and
AWARENESS [F(1,692)=45.328; p=<.001]. Females showed higher means in all dimen-
sions except AWARENESS. To examine the potential moderating effect of gender on
the relationship between DERS dimensions and POSI we tested six separate models
using the SPSS macro PROCESS suggested by Hayes [39]. This SPSS macro
PROCESS is specifically developed for assessing the complex models including mod-
erator variables. Simple slope analyses were completed to determine the nature of the
moderation effects.
4
Table 1. Means, standard deviations, and Pearson's correlations between the study
variables. Males’ data below the diagonal, females’ data above the diagonal.
M(SD)
Males Females 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 POSI 2.46(1.498) 2.47(1.510) - .101* .090 .092 .030 .079 .083
2 DERS
2.54(.954) 2.55(1.054) .322** - .424** .550** .443** .307** -.018
NoAccept
3 DERS
3.11(.949) 3.50(.950) .235** .489** - .594** .573** .314** -.230**
Goals
4 DERS
2.83(.669) 2.80(.740) .256** .553** .421** - .526** .393** .144**
Strategies
5 DERS
2.88(.936) 3.13(1.019) .241** .473** .694** .390** - .214** -.138**
Impulse
6 DERS
2.76(.868) 2.97(.907) .282** .293** .269** .488** .195** - .257**
Clarity
7 DERS
2.75(.893) 2.32(.794) -.021 -.044 -.363** .218** -.381** .270** -
Awareness
4 Results
Table 2 shows the results from testing gender as moderator. A moderating effect exists
if the coefficient of the product term (independent variable by moderator) is significant.
The coefficients of NOACCEPTANCE, GOALS, STRATEGIES, IMPULSE and
CLARITY * gender were significant at the 0.05 level, indicating that gender moderated
the relationships between these DERS dimensions and POSI. Thus, the moderating
roles of gender on the relation were confirmed.
Table 2. Moderating effect test for gender.
β SE t p
Model 1
NOACCEPTANCE -.293 .171 -1.7105 .088
Gender -.850 .311 -2.7340 .006
NOACCEPTANCE * Gender .350 .113 3.1133 .002
Model 2
GOALS -.239 .194 -1.2330 .218
Gender -.782 .414 -1.8876 .060
GOALS * Gender .250 .120 2.0845 .038
Model 3
STRATEGIES -.525 .254 -2.0685 .039
Gender -1.010 .469 -2.1534 .032
STRATEGIES * Gender .376 .162 2.3258 .020
Model 4
IMPULSE -.474 .178 -2.6645 .008
Gender -1.006 .375 -2.6797 .008
IMPULSE * Gender .347 .117 2.9509 .003
Model 5
CLARITY -.353 .194 -1.8197 .069
Gender -.984 .379 -2.5995 .010
CLARITY * Gender .363 .127 2.8626 .004
Model 6
AWARENESS .318 .214 1.4863 .138
Gender .483 .359 1.3446 .179
5
AWARENESS * Gender -.173 .134 -1.2918 .197
Dependent Variable: POSI
Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 graphically show the changes of POSI between genders: males
prefer online social interactions more than women when have difficulties in emotion
regulations. Specifically, as can be seen in Figure 1, for high difficulties in emotions
acceptance, boys report a much higher preference for online social interactions, but for
low NOACCEPTANCE the males’ preference is lower than females. Similarly, for
higher difficulties engaging in goal-directed behavior (GOALS) the males’ POSI in-
creases (Figure 2). In Figures 3 and 4 while for higher limited access to emotion regu-
lation strategies (STRATEGIES) and impulse control difficulties (IMPULSE) boys re-
port higher preference for online social interactions, girls show lower POSI. Finally,
Figure 5 shows that gender moderates the CLARITY-POSI relation: for higher lack of
emotional clarity (CLARITY) boys’ POSI increases. For girls the effect appears almost
unchanged.
4
2.903
3 2.391 2.449
2.508
POSI
2 2,491
2.079
1
0
Low Medium High
NOACCEPTANCE
Male Female
Fig. 1. Moderating effect of gender on NOACCEPTANCE-POSI relation.
3 2.518 2.770
2,5 2.458 2.479
2.468
2 2.266
POSI
1,5
1
0,5
0
Low Medium High
GOALS
Males Females
Fig. 2. Moderating effect of gender on GOALS-POSI relation.
6
3 2.651
2.490
2,5 2.549
2.443
2 2.329 2.338
POSI
1,5
1
0,5
0
Low Medium High
STRATEGIES
Males Females
Fig. 3. Moderating effect of gender on STRATEGIES-POSI relation.
3 2.727
2.596 2.510
2,5
2.292 2.470
2 2.344
POSI
1,5
1
0,5
0
Low Medium High
IMPULSE
Males Females
Fig. 4. Moderating effect of gender on IMPULSE-POSI relation.
3 2.851
2.518
2,5 2.450 2.468
2 2.459
2.184
POSI
1,5
1
0,5
0
Low Medium High
CLARITY
Males Females
Fig. 5. Moderating effect of gender on CLARITY-POSI relation.
7
5 Discussion and conclusion
This present study explored the relation between adolescents’ difficulties in emotion
regulation and their problematic preference for web-mediated interactions, highlighting
gender-related differences.
Contrary to previous findings were males were more predisposed to difficulties in
emotion regulation [9,17,34,35,36], in this study girls showed higher mean scores than
boys in difficulties engaging in goal-directed behaviors, controlling impulses due to
negative emotional states, and in clear understanding of experienced emotions. More-
over, girls showed lower awareness of their emotions than boys. No statistically signif-
icative gender-related differences were found in mean scores of preference for online
social interactions and difficulties in acceptance of their own emotions and in access to
emotion regulation strategies.
Gender was found to have a moderating role on the relationship between emotion
dysregulation and preference for web-mediated interactions. Indeed, the effect of poor
ability to understand, accept, modulate, and manage negative emotions was signifi-
cantly different between males and females. Despite higher levels of emotion-related
difficulties and an inclination for social and communicative activities online [4,28,29],
girls with higher difficulties in regulation of emotional states did not prefer online social
interactions. On the contrary, boys’ problematic preference for web-mediated interac-
tions always increased for difficulties in acceptance, understanding, control, and mod-
ulating negative emotions. Likely, even though girls use social media for social pur-
poses, they could prefer to express and display their emotional experiences mostly turn-
ing to others in face-to-face relations. In another way, girls could carry out other online
and offline activities to try and regulate their negative emotions. On the contrary, boys
that might express their emotions in a more physical way [17] could prefer online social
interactions and other web-related activities to manage and take out their negative emo-
tions [12,17,18,19]. These controversial findings could be related to the involved boys’
and girls’ cultural context, their personal characteristics, or, overall, to the rapid
changes in adolescents’ online interests and activities that reflect how fast are the
changes in social media landscape [40,41].
Some limitations need to be addressed. Firstly, this preliminary study explores just
one dimension of problematic Social Network sites use in association with difficulties
in emotion regulation. Other aspects should be explored, especially the SNS misuse as
mood regulator [19]. Secondly, other psychosocial factors should be investigated in
association with emotion dysregulation, trying to identify gender-related differences in
SNS use. In this regard, this study highlighted that the heterogeneity of scholar findings
reflects the need of problematic social media use research field of further exploration.
Finally, these findings clearly showed the importance of interventions aimed to increase
teens’ awareness, understanding, acceptance, and regulation of emotions, in online and
offline contexts.
8
References
1. Mascheroni, G., Ólafsson, K.: Accesso, usi, rischi e opportunità di internet per i ragazzi
italiani. I primi risultati di EU Kids Online 2017. EU Kids Online e OssCom, (2018).
2. Online Safety Site Homepage, https://www.onlinesafetysite.com/P1/Teenstats.htm. (2017)
3. Boursier, V., Manna, V.: Problematic Linkages in Adolescents: Italian Adaptation of a
Measure for Internet-Related Problems. In Psychological, Social, and Cultural Aspects of
Internet Addiction, IGI Global, 253-282 (2018).
4. Boursier, V., Manna, V.: Selfie expectancies among adolescents: Construction and valida-
tion of an instrument to assess expectancies toward selfies among boys and girls. Frontiers
in psychology, 9, 1-14 (2018).
5. Boursier, V., Manna, V.: Relational Body Identities: Body Image Control Through Self-
Portraits–A Revision of the Body Image Control in Photos Questionnaire. In Intimacy and
Developing Personal Relationships in the Virtual World IGI Global, 40-63 (2019).
6. D’Arienzo, M. C., Boursier, V., Griffiths, M. D.: Addiction to Social Media and Attachment
Styles: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Mental Health and Addic-
tion, 1-25 (2019).
7. McQuillan, H., Neill, B. O.: Gender differences in children's Internet use: Key findings from
Europe. Journal of Children and Media, 3(4), 366-378 (2009).
8. Livingstone, S.: Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers' use of
social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New media & society,
10(3), 393-411 (2008).
9. Munno, D., Saroldi, M., Bechon, E., Sterpone, S. C. M., Zullo, G.: (2016). Addictive behav-
iors and personality traits in adolescents. CNS spectrums, 21(2), 207-213.
10. Kuss, D., Griffiths, M., Karila, L., Billieux, J.: Internet addiction: a systematic review of
epidemiological research for the last decade. Current pharmaceutical design, 20(25), 4026-
4052 (2014).
11. Rumpf, HJ., Brandt, D., Demetrovics, Z. et al.: Epidemiological Challenges in the Study of
Behavioral Addictions: a Call for High Standard Methodologies. Current Addiction Reports,
1-7 (2019).
12. Casale, S., Caplan, S. E., Fioravanti, G.: Positive metacognitions about Internet use: The
mediating role in the relationship between emotional dysregulation and problematic use.
Addictive behaviors, 59, 84-88 (2016).
13. Kun, B., Demetrovics, Z.: Emotional intelligence and addictions: a systematic review. Sub-
stance use & misuse, 45(7-8), 1131-1160 (2010).
14. Williams, A. D., Grisham, J. R., Erskine, A., Cassedy, E.: Deficits in emotion regulation
associated with pathological gambling. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 51(2), 223-
238 (2012)
15. Wills, T. A., Pokhrel, P., Morehouse, E., Fenster, B.: Behavioral and emotional regulation
and adolescent substance use problems: a test of moderation effects in a dual-process model.
Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25(2), 279 (2011).
16. Gratz, K. L., Roemer L.: Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregu-
lation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion
regulation scale. Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment, 26(1), 41-54.
(2004).
17. Yu, J. J., Kim, H., Hay, I.: Understanding adolescents’ problematic Internet use from a so-
cial/cognitive and addiction research framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6),
2682-2689 (2013).
9
18. Caplan, S. E.: Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a the-
ory-based cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument. Computers in Human Behav-
ior,18(5), 553–575 (2002).
19. Caplan, S. E.: Theory and measurement of generalized problematic Internet use: A two-step
approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1089–1097 (2010).
20. Gámez-Guadix, M., Calvete, E., Orue, I., Las Hayas, C.: Problematic Internet use and prob-
lematic alcohol use from the cognitive-behavioral model: A longitudinal study among ado-
lescents. Addictive Behaviors, 40, 109–114 (2014).
21. Tokunaga, R. S.: Perspectives on Internet addiction, problematic Internet use, and deficient
self-regulation. In E. Cohen (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 39(pp. 131–161). New York:
Routledge (2015).
22. Du, Y. S., Jiang, W., Vance, A.: Longer term effect of randomized, controlled group cogni-
tive behavioural therapy for Internet addiction in adolescent students in Shanghai. Australian
and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 44(2), 129-134 (2010).
23. Gioia, F., Boursier, V.: Treatment of Internet Addiction and Internet Gaming Disorder in
Adolescence: A Systematic Review. In Multifaceted Approach to Digital Addiction and Its
Treatment. IGI Global, 157-176 (2019).
24. Park, J. H., Lee, Y. S., Sohn, J. H., Han, D. H.: Effectiveness of atomoxetine and
methylphenidate for problematic online gaming in adolescents with attention deficit hyper-
activity disorder. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental, 31(6), 427-432
(2016).
25. Song, J., Park, J. H., Han, D. H., Roh, S., Son, J. H., Choi, T. Y., ... Lee, Y. S.: Comparative
study of the effects of bupropion and escitalopram on I nternet gaming disorder. Psychiatry
and clinical neurosciences, 70(11), 527-535 (2016).
26. Joiner, R., Gavin, J., Duffield, J., Brosnan, M., Crook, C., Durndell, A., ... Lovatt, P.: Gen-
der, Internet identification, and Internet anxiety: Correlates of Internet use. Cyber Psychol-
ogy & Behavior, 8(4), 371-378 (2005).
27. Abraham, L. B., Morn, M. P., Vollman, A. Women on the web: How women are shaping
the internet. Comscore Inc. (2010).
28. Dufour, M., Brunelle, N., Tremblay, J., Leclerc, D., Cousineau, M. M., Khazaal, Y., ... Ber-
biche, D.: Gender difference in internet use and internet problems among Quebec high
school students. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 61(10), 663-668 (2016).
29. Junco, R., Merson, D., Salter, D. W.: The effect of gender, ethnicity, and income on college
students' use of communication technologies. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Net-
working, 13(6), 619-627 (2010).
30. Mihara, S., Osaki, Y., Nakayama, H., Sakuma, H., Ikeda, M., Itani, O., ... Higuchi, S. Inter-
net use and problematic Internet use among adolescents in Japan: A nationwide representa-
tive survey. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 4, 58-64 (2016).
31. Chen, S. Y., Fu, Y. C.: Internet use and academic achievement: gender differences in early
adolescence. Adolescence, 44(176), 797 (2009).
32. Gross, E. F.: Adolescent Internet use: What we expect, what teens report. Journal of applied
developmental psychology, 25(6), 633-649 (2004).
33. Tufekci, Z.: Grooming, gossip, Facebook and MySpace: What can we learn about these sites
from those who won't assimilate?. Information, Communication & Society, 11(4), 544-564
(2008).
34. Barrett, L. F., Lane, R. D., Sechrest, L., Schwartz, G. E.: Sex differences in emotional aware-
ness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1027-1035 (2000).
35. Nolen-Hoeksema, S.: Emotion regulation and psychopathology: The role of gender. Annual
review of clinical psychology, 8, 161-187 (2012).
10
36. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Aldao, A.: Gender and age differences in emotion regulation strategies
and their relationship to depressive symptoms. Personality and individual differences, 51(6),
704-708 (2011).
37. Giromini, L., Velotti, P., de Campora, G., Bonalume, L., Zavattini, G. C.: Cultural adapta-
tion of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: Reliability and validity of an Italian
version. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68, 989–1007 (2012).
38. Casale, S., Fioravanti, G.: Shamme experiences and problematic Social Networking sites
use: An unexplored association. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 14(1) (2017).
39. Hayes, A. F.: Process for SPSS. The Ohio State University, Release, 2(2) (2014).
40. Griffiths, M. D., Kuss, D.: Adolescent social media addiction (revisited). Education and
Health, 35(3), 49-52 (2017).
41. van den Eijnden, R. J., Lemmens, J. S., Valkenburg, P. M.: The social media disorder scale.
Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 478-487 (2016).
42. Boursier, V., Manna, V., Gioia, F., Coppola, F., Venosa, N.: Cyber-moms facing mother-
hood: Holding functions and regressive movements in parenting websites. In Global per-
spectives on health communication in the age of social media, IGI Global, 29-58 (2018).
43. Boursier, V., Gioia, F., Coppola, F., Schimmenti, A.: Digital storytellers: Parents facing with
children’s autism in an Italian web forum. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology,
7(3) (2019).