<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Radiation to Variations of Underlying Surface Emissivity Coefficient</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Egor Yu. Mordvin</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Anatoly A. Lagutin</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Rimma V. Kravchenko</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Altai State University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Barnaul</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="RU">Russia</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>We study the sensitivity of outgoing longwave radiation to variations of underlying surface emissivity  с( ). The approach to solving the problem consideration is based on the functional theory of sensitivity. Using the analytical result obtained in the work on the differential sensitivity coefficient of the outgoing radiation as well as the computational complex created on the basis of the LBLRTM shown that the maximum sensitivity of the outgoing longwave radiation to the variations of  с( ) is observed in the ranges of 780-1000 cm-1 and 1015-1200 cm-1.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Coefficient</kwd>
        <kwd>outgoing longwave radiation</kwd>
        <kwd>sensitivity</kwd>
        <kwd>emissivity</kwd>
        <kwd>underlying surface</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>LBLRTM.</title>
      <sec id="sec-1-1">
        <title>Introduction</title>
        <p>
          the spectral intensity  
radiation can be represented as [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
          ]
        </p>
        <p>
          Outgoing longwave radiation is one of the key components of the Earth radiation balance [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref2">1,2</xref>
          ]. It characterizes
the amount of energy generated by the radiation of the underlying surface of the Earth and the ascending radiation of
the atmosphere, which goes into space from the “underlying surface – atmosphere” system.
        </p>
        <p>Let the temperature, pressure and the emissivity of the underlying surface be denoted as   ,   and   ( ), the
Planck function will be denoted as  ( ,   ), and by  ( , 
→ 0;  ) we shall mean transmission function of the
atmospheric radiation with the frequency  on the path “the atmospheric level with pressure  – satellite”. In this case
( ,  ) of the outgoing from the cloudless nonscattering atmosphere under a zenith angle 
 
( ,  ) =   ( ) ( ,   ) ( ,   → 0;  ) + ∫  ( ,  ( ))
 ( ,</p>
        <p>→ 0;  )
 ln( )
 ln( ).
atmosphere is described by the expression</p>
        <p>It should be noted that in this work we neglect the contributions of solar radiation and the rescattering of
descending radiation by underlying surface into the spectral intensity (1) of outgoing longwave radiation (OLR).</p>
        <p>It can also be shown that if the fraction  of a pixel is covered by cloud at pressure level  с, whose emissivity is
 с( ) and the temperature at the upper edge is  с, then the spectral intensity of the radiation leaving the cloudy
 ( ,  ) = (1 −    ( )) 
+    ( ) 
( с),
(1)
(2)
where
equation
 
( с) =  ( ,   ) ( ,   → 0;  ) + ∫  ( ,  ( ))
 ( ,</p>
        <p>→ 0;  )
 ln( )
 ln( )
is the intensity of radiation emanating from an opaque cloud at cloud top pressure  с.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>The flux of the outgoing longwave radiation  was found by integrating the intensity (2) with respect to angles and frequency. In the case of azimuthal symmetry of the outgoing radiation, the OLR flux is determined by the</title>
      <p>= 2 ∫</p>
      <p>∫  ( ,  ) sin  cos   .</p>
      <p>
        In this paper, the integral of the spectral OLR with respect to angle 
was calculated in the framework of the
“effective angle approximation”, which is determined by the expression [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">4,5</xref>
        ]
 = 2
( ,   ( )) ∫
sin  cos  
=
      </p>
      <p>( ,   ( )).
 ⁄2
 ⁄2</p>
      <p>∞
0
 =  ∫  ( ,   ( ))  .</p>
      <p>For the range 2–2750 cm-1, the values of effective angles obtained in [4] are given in table 1.
(4)
(5)
(6)</p>
      <p>The equations (2)–(3) show that the OLR flux is determined by the emissivity and the temperature of the
underlying surface, temperature and humidity profiles, cloud properties, as well as concentrations of greenhouse
gases and aerosols in the atmosphere. Due to the presence of nonlinear relationships between these characteristics of
the system and the OLR, the interpretation of experimental results obtained by satellite devices requires data on the</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>OLR sensitivity to system characteristic variations.</title>
      <p>
        To solve such problems, in our work [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ], we propose an approach based on the functional theory of sensitivity [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ].
The coefficients of the differential sensitivity of the infrared spaceborne hyperspectrometer’s readings to variations of
the gas composition of the atmosphere have been obtained. It is shown that this coefficient is expressed in terms of
the mass absorption coefficient of the studied gas and the universal function determined by the intensity of the
outgoing radiation for the undisturbed atmosphere.
      </p>
      <p>In this paper, this approach is used to analyze the effect of variations in the emissivity on the flux of longwave
radiation leaving the atmosphere. The relevance of this study is due to the need to estimate how the OLR is affected
by the changes in the structure of underlying surface caused by both climate changes in global and regional scales and
landuse, to take into account errors in the dependence of the emissivity on the wavenumber during the interpretation
of satellite data, and to verify the correctness of the   ( ) definition in climate models.
2</p>
      <p>The sensitivity of the outgoing radiation flux to variations of the underlying surface</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Following [6], the variation of the flux  ,</title>
      <p>which is due to change of emissivity   ( ) →  ′( ) =   ( ) +    ( ), will be presented in the form</p>
      <p>
        The first functional derivative in (4) is conventionally called the differential sensitivity coefficient (see [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6 ref7">6,7</xref>
        ]).
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Function</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>OLR flux:</title>
      <p>3</p>
      <p>Results
( (∙) →  ′(∙)) =  ( ′(∙)) −  ( (∙)),
describes a percentage variation  caused by a change of   in a unit interval around  0 by 1%.</p>
      <p>Calculating the variational derivative, we find the coefficient of differential sensitivity and the variation of the
 (  (∙))
   ( 0) 0
∞
0</p>
      <p>=  (1 −    ( 0)) ( 0,   ) ( 0,   → 0;   ( 0)) ,
=  ∫ (1 −    ( 0)) ( 0,   ) ( 0,   → 0;   ( 0))  
 ( 0) 0
.</p>
      <p>
        Calculations of the atmospheric transmission function  ( ,   → 0;   ), the OLR flux and the differential
sensitivity coefficient were performed using the LBLRTM (Line-By-Line Radioactive Transfer Model) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]. Preparing
the necessary characteristics of the atmosphere and the underlying surface for the model as well as generating a
configuration file for LBLRTM run was carried out using the program developed by the authors. Atmospheric and
surface data were extracted from the research product AIRS version 6, which contains measurements at 100
atmospheric levels with the altitude range from the surface up to ~60 km. To set the emissivity of the underlying
surface we use data from the MODIS UCSB Emissivity Library of the MODIS LST group at University of California,
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Santa Barbara (UCSB) (http://www.icess.ucsb.edu/modis/EMIS/html/em.html).</title>
      <p>Figures 1 and 2 show the dependence of flux sensitivity  on frequency in a cloudless atmosphere for a sandy
surface and for a surface covered with vegetation. It is easy to see that the sensitivity peaks are in the ranges of 780–
1000 cm-1 and 1015–1200 cm-1. Significantly lower sensitivity is observed in the ranges 2100–2200 cm-1 and 2480–
2550 cm-1.
to the variation of the emissivity   by 1% in the interval 
a sandy surface.
to the variation of the emissivity   by 1% in the interval 
a surface covered with vegetation.
=  ⁄1200 for
4</p>
      <sec id="sec-7-1">
        <title>Conclusion</title>
        <p>In this paper, the effect of variations in the emissivity of underlying surface on the flux of longwave radiation
leaving the atmosphere was analysed. The approach implemented in this paper is based on the functional theory of
sensitivity. Using the analytical result obtained in the work on the coefficient of differential sensitivity of the outgoing
radiation as well as the computational complex created on the basis of the LBLRTM model, it is shown that the
maximum sensitivity of the outgoing longwave radiation to the variations of emissivity is observed in the ranges of
780–1000 cm-1 and 1015–1200 cm-1.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Trenberth</surname>
            <given-names>K.E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fasullo</surname>
            <given-names>J.T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kiehl</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <source>Earth's global energy budget // Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc</source>
          .
          <year>2009</year>
          . Vol.
          <volume>90</volume>
          . Pp.
          <volume>311</volume>
          -
          <fpage>323</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stephens</surname>
            <given-names>G.L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Li</surname>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wild</surname>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          et al.
          <article-title>An update on Earth's energy balance in light of the latest global observations // Nat</article-title>
          . Geosci.
          <year>2012</year>
          . Vol.
          <volume>5</volume>
          . Pp.
          <volume>691</volume>
          -
          <fpage>696</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Timofeev</given-names>
            <surname>Yu</surname>
          </string-name>
          .M.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vasilyev</surname>
            <given-names>A.V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Theoretical basis of atmospheric optics</article-title>
          .
          <source>SPb: Nauka</source>
          ,
          <year>2003</year>
          (in Russian).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Mehta A.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Susskind</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>J</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Outgoing longwave radiation from the TOVS Pathfinder Path A data set</article-title>
          // J. Geophys. Res.
          <year>1999</year>
          . Vol.
          <volume>104</volume>
          . N.
          <year>D1</year>
          ,
          <volume>2</volume>
          .
          <fpage>193</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>12</lpage>
          .
          <fpage>212</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Susskind</surname>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Blaisdell</surname>
            <given-names>J.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and Iredell L.
          <article-title>Improved methodology for surface and atmospheric soundings, error estimates, and quality control procedures: the atmospheric infrared sounder science team version-6 retrieval algorithm</article-title>
          // J. Applied Remote Sensing.
          <year>2014</year>
          . Vol.
          <volume>8</volume>
          . Pp.
          <volume>1</volume>
          -
          <fpage>33</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Sarmisokov Z.T.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Lagutin</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.A.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Mordvin</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Yu</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Sensitivity of the satellite thermal infrared hyperspetrometer to variations of atmospheric characteristic // Proс</article-title>
          . SPIE.
          <year>2017</year>
          . Vol.
          <volume>10466</volume>
          ,
          <year>104661Z</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lagutin</surname>
            <given-names>A. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Uchaikin</surname>
            <given-names>V. V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>The method of conjugate equations in the theory of high-energy cosmic ray transport</article-title>
          .
          <source>Barnaul: ASU publishing house</source>
          ,
          <year>2013</year>
          (in Russian).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Clough</surname>
            <given-names>S.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shephard</surname>
            <given-names>M.W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mlawer</surname>
            <given-names>E.J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          et al.
          <article-title>Atmospheric radiative transfer modeling: a summary of the AER codes /</article-title>
          / JQSRT.
          <year>2005</year>
          . Vol.
          <volume>91</volume>
          . P.
          <volume>233</volume>
          -
          <fpage>244</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>