<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>FDIA</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Multidimensional Relevance in Microblog Search</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Divi Galih Prasetyo Putri</string-name>
          <email>d.putri@campus.unimib.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Search</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Universit degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Dipartimento di Informatica Sistemistica e Comunicazione</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Viale Sarca 336, Milan, 20126</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2019</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>17</volume>
      <fpage>17</fpage>
      <lpage>18</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>In Information Retrieval, the assessment of relevance is affected by multiple criteria. This doctoral research aims to understand which relevance criteria or dimensions can a ect the e ectiveness of Microblog search systems. The research is based on the hypotheses that depending on the search intention, the user will consider di erent criteria and give di erent importance to the various relevance dimensions.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Microblog Search Task</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>
        The concept of multidimensional relevance in Information Retrieval has been
introduced by several works in the literature [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3 ref5">5, 3</xref>
        ]. Relevance is in fact a
complex notion that relies on several dimensions since a user generally evaluates
whether a document is relevant not only based on topicality. However, there has
not been much research nalised to explore relevance dimensions in the
context of social search. In [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
        ], the authors have characterised the main di erences
between web search and Microblog search. The huge amount and the
characteristics of user-generated content (UGC) constitute a challenge in the process of
information seeking, as generally UGC in microblogs are very short and can
contain some noise, irregular syntax, slang and misspelled words. Moreover, UGC is
not always credible. Recently, some research works proposed a quality indicator
of microblogs (Tweet) and exploited it as a relevance criterion in the retrieval
model; examples of such indicators are credibility [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
        ], informativeness [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ],
interestingness [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ][
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ], and opinionatedness[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>This doctoral research aims to explore the notion of multidimensional
relevance in Microblog search, in particular with reference to speci c search tasks,
related to di erent search intentions. We postulate that each speci c task might
need an evaluation process that relies on di erent relevance dimensions
(evaluation criteria or aspects). This implies that we can de ne which dimensions are
important for a given task, and we can develop a method to aggregate the
assessment of those dimensions so as to characterize the evaluation of relevance for
the di erent tasks. The tasks we consider are supported by existing datasets. We
have conducted a preliminary study where we de ne relevance dimensions that
we have identi ed base on properties introduced in previous studies about
Microblog Retrieval, namely credibility, informativeness, interestingness, and
opinionatedness. First, We explore which aspects or dimensions can be useful to
estimate relevance. Then, the combination of the dimensions and the
importance of each dimension have to be tailored speci cally to the various search
task we aim to consider.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Relevance in Microblog Search</title>
      <p>
        As previously outlined, the multi-dimensionality of relevance has been outlined
in several papers, and as a matter of fact, search engines consider multiple
dimensions to assess relevance. Among the most used relevance dimensions are
Topicality, Novelty, and Reliability [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16 ref5">16, 5</xref>
        ]. However, in the literature, no study
has addressed this issue in the context of Microblog search. During the rst
period of doctoral research, we have identi ed some relevance dimensions that
could be potentially useful in Microblog search. Moreover, as it will be
introduced in Section 3, we have identi ed di erent shared task related to Microblog
search. We want to study the association between the relevance dimensions and
the search tasks.
2.1
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Informativeness</title>
        <p>
          Informativeness has several de nitions. It has been de ned as \the extent to
which a tweet meets the general interest of people involved with or tracking the
event"[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
          ]. Another study uses a similar de nition of interestingness used in [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
          ]
as \speci c information that people might care about" [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ]. In [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ], the authors
perform human annotation to assess whether a document is relevant or not and
whether it is informative or not. The result shows that informativeness and
relevance are correlated and retweeted tweets tend to be more informative [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ]. In
[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
          ], the authors eliminate non-informative tweets by adapting another work on
tweet ranking and credibility. The result shows that credible users tend to post
informative content and the proposed approach can help improve the ranking
quality.
2.2
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>Credibility</title>
        <p>
          Credibility is also used as a quality notion of a document. Previous research
utilizes several Microblog features to estimate the credibility of a document [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
          ].
The authors adopt the method proposed by another study on the credibility
of a blog post and add several Microblog features such as repost, follower, and
recency. They use a language modelling approach and use the credibility as the
prior probability. Not only the credibility of the content but also the credibility
of the user is being evaluated to improve retrieval [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
          ]. In this paper, the
authors build a network consisting of retweet, mention, and reply to estimate user
credibility score.
2.3
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>Interestingness</title>
        <p>
          Microblogs can be used by many people to communicate with other people about
personal matters. However, private and personal messages are not what people
are looking for in Microblogs [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
          ]. A tweet is considered useful to a user if the
tweet is interesting to the user. Several studies tried to incorporate
interestingness as a static quality measure of a tweet [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref11 ref14">1, 11, 14</xref>
          ]. These studies all proposed
classi cation technique (logistic regression and nave bayes) to calculate the
interestingness as the quality of a document. A concept related to the interestingness
of a tweet is the Retweet (RT). Some works calculated the probability of a tweet
being retweeted as the interestingness score [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref11">1, 11</xref>
          ]. Interestingness also able to
improve the search task when it is used to remove tweet with interestingness
score below the threshold but gives a lower performance in re-ranking.
2.4
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-4">
        <title>Opinionatedness</title>
        <p>
          Opinionatedness as a relevance dimension is related to the opinion retrieval task.
The aim of this task is to retrieve relevant documents that contain user opinions
on a topic while the opinion can be positive or negative. Previous research
implemented a lexicon-based approach to estimate the opinionatedness of tweet [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
          ].
The score is combined with social features using L2R to generate the ranking.
Another study also estimates the opinionatedness of a document by using the
average opinion score and add stylistic-based opinion score [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
          ].
3
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Research Question</title>
      <p>
        This doctoral research is focused on relevance assessment in Microblog search.
Following the concept of multidimensional relevance, we want to exploit
several aspects of relevance that can improve the e ectiveness of Microblog search.
Speci cally, we want to study the concept and behavior of multidimensional
relevance related to the search task ( Ex: Event Retrieval, Opinion Retrieval, etc.).
The main research questions are as follows:
Research Question 1 (RQ1) : What are the aspects of relevance
dimension that important in di erent microblog search-tasks?
Several aspects of relevance in Microblog search have been introduced in
previous studies such as credibility, informativeness, and etc. Di erent search task in
Microblog might have di erent search intent. The value used in assessing and
ranking UGC can vary depending on the intention. For example, people search
for user opinion on a topic in Microblog. In this case, the IR system will also
consider opinionatedness as relevance dimension of the content. Only limited
studies on speci c search task have considered more than topical aspect. This
work is based on the hypothesis that each of the search tasks tends to favor
di erent aspect of relevance. This research questions can extend our knowledge
on the application of multidimensional relevance in microblog search.
Research Question 2 (RQ2): How to model the dimensional
importance and how to combine it with another dimension?
The retrieval status value of a single retrieved document is calculated based on
several values representing the considered dimensions. In di erent search-task,
the user might prioritize or give di erent weight to some dimension. In [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ], the
authors proposed the use of Multi-Criteria Decision Making to perform
prioritized aggregation of several relevance criteria. This concept supports the idea of
having di erent importance in di erent task or domain. By extending the
concept of prioritized aggregation, a model has to be able to change dynamically
when di erent importance is assigned to each relevance dimension.
4
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Methodology</title>
      <p>In the planned experiments, data from Twitter will be used. In order to
examine di erent relevance dimensions in di erent search tasks, we will consider the
following retrieval tasks, with associated datasets:</p>
      <p>To understand the impact of each relevance dimension on a speci c search
task, we make use of a retrieval system using only topical relevance as the baseline
system. Then for each of the additional relevance dimension we will consider,
the score will be combined with the topicality score by using linear combination.
4.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>Preliminary Result</title>
        <p>
          In this paper we report the preliminary experiment related to two search tasks.
We have employed the following datasets: Disaster Related Retrieval- SMERP
2017 on Text Retrieval (Level-1 and Level-2) and Opinion Retrieval Data. In this
preliminary experiment we consider only one additional relevance dimension, i.e
informativeness. The retrieval system is developed using Apache Lucene. For
the baseline, we use Language Model with Dirichlet Smoothing as the retrieval
model. The RSV of the baseline is the topicality score RSVt that will be combined
with informativeness score RSVi by means of a linear combination. We estimate
the nal RSV using RSV = RSVt + (1 )RSVi. We tune the weight in
steps of 0.1. Runs were evaluated using trec-eval, an evaluation tool provided by
TREC.
1 https://www.computing.dcu.ie/ dganguly/smerp2017/
2 https://mc2.talne.eu/
To estimate the score of Informativeness, we exploit an annotated dataset that
publicly available [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
          ]. This dataset labeled based on the information source
and information type (informativeness). In this dataset, they de ne a tweet as
informative if it helps to understand the situation. We build a model using
logistic regression to predict the probability and the informativeness value of a
new tweet. The features used in this study is based on the previous study [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
          ].
We use 5-fold cross validation in the experiment and the model is able to get the
precision of 73,73%, recall of 85,19%, and f-measure of 78,99%. Fig. 1 illustrates
the results of our experiment using Language Model as the baseline. The
xaxis represents the weight of the topicality value and y-axis shows the MAP
score. We use this gure to highlight the changes in MAP score with respect to
the weight. We can see in Fig.1 that adding informativeness value can improve
the performance of disaster-related tweet retrieval. Both in SMERP level-1 and
SMERP level-2 dataset, the combination outperforms the baseline when the
weight is 0.1 and 0.2. However, combining informativeness does not improve the
result of the opinion retrieval system. We can infer that informativeness has an
impact on disaster-related retrieval task but not on opinion retrieval task.
5
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Conclusion and Future Work</title>
      <p>In this work, we focus on exploring the use of multidimensional relevance in
di erent tasks of Microblog search. We combine topicality with another relevance
dimension and evaluate the system using two di erent types of dataset
(Disasterrelated retrieval task and opinion retrieval task) to see the impact in each search
task. In future work, we plan to implement other aspects of relevance such as
credibility, interestingness, and opinionatedness, and also to evaluate the system
using other dataset related to other tasks in Microblog search.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alhadi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gottron</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kunegis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Naveed</surname>
          </string-name>
          , N.:
          <article-title>Livetweet: Microblog retrieval based on interestingness and an adaptation of the vector space model</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: TREC</source>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alonso</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Carson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gerster</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ji</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nabar</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.U.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Detecting uninteresting content in text streams</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: SIGIR Crowdsourcing for Search Evaluation Workshop</source>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Borlund</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>The concept of relevance in ir</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology</source>
          <volume>54</volume>
          (
          <issue>10</issue>
          ),
          <volume>913</volume>
          {
          <fpage>925</fpage>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Choi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Croft</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kim</surname>
          </string-name>
          , J.Y.:
          <article-title>Quality models for microblog retrieval</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management</source>
          . pp.
          <year>1834</year>
          {
          <year>1838</year>
          . ACM (
          <year>2012</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5. da Costa Pereira,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Dragoni</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Pasi</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G.:
          <article-title>Multidimensional relevance: Prioritized aggregation in a personalized information retrieval setting</article-title>
          .
          <source>Information processing &amp; management 48(2)</source>
          ,
          <volume>340</volume>
          {
          <fpage>357</fpage>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Giachanou</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Harvey</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Crestani</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Topic-speci c stylistic variations for opinion retrieval on twitter</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: European Conference on Information Retrieval</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>466</volume>
          {
          <fpage>478</fpage>
          . Springer (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Huang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zubiaga</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ji</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Deng</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Le</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Abdelzaher</surname>
            , T., Han,
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Leung</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hancock</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , et al.:
          <article-title>Tweet ranking based on heterogeneous networks</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proceedings of COLING 2012</source>
          pp.
          <volume>1239</volume>
          {
          <issue>1256</issue>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Luo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Osborne</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>An e ective approach to tweets opinion retrieval</article-title>
          .
          <source>World Wide Web</source>
          <volume>18</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <volume>545</volume>
          {
          <fpage>566</fpage>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mahata</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Talburt</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Singh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>From chirps to whistles: discovering eventspeci c informative content from twitter</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the ACM web science conference</source>
          . p.
          <fpage>17</fpage>
          .
          <string-name>
            <surname>ACM</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Massoudi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tsagkias</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>De Rijke</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Weerkamp</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Incorporating query expansion and quality indicators in searching microblog posts</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: European Conference on Information Retrieval</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>362</volume>
          {
          <fpage>367</fpage>
          . Springer (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Naveed</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gottron</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kunegis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alhadi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Searching microblogs: coping with sparsity and document quality</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>183</volume>
          {
          <fpage>188</fpage>
          .
          <string-name>
            <surname>ACM</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Olteanu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vieweg</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Castillo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>What to expect when the unexpected happens: Social media communications across crises</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work &amp; social computing</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>994</volume>
          {
          <fpage>1009</fpage>
          .
          <string-name>
            <surname>ACM</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Surdeanu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ciaramita</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zaragoza</surname>
          </string-name>
          , H.:
          <article-title>Learning to rank answers to nonfactoid questions from web collections</article-title>
          .
          <source>Computational linguistics 37(2)</source>
          ,
          <volume>351</volume>
          {
          <fpage>383</fpage>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tao</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Abel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hau</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Houben</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.J.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Twinder: a search engine for twitter streams</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: International Conference on Web Engineering</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>153</volume>
          {
          <fpage>168</fpage>
          . Springer (
          <year>2012</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Teevan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ramage</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Morris</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title># twittersearch: a comparison of microblog search and web search</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>35</volume>
          {
          <fpage>44</fpage>
          .
          <string-name>
            <surname>ACM</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Xu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Relevance judgment: What do information users consider beyond topicality</article-title>
          ?
          <source>Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology</source>
          <volume>57</volume>
          (
          <issue>7</issue>
          ),
          <volume>961</volume>
          {
          <fpage>973</fpage>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          17.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhao</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Xu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Huang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , H.:
          <article-title>Exploiting user activities for answer ranking in q&amp;a forums</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>693</volume>
          {
          <fpage>703</fpage>
          . Springer (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>