<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>EEG based emotion recognition of image stimuli</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Girma Neshir</string-name>
          <email>girma1978@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Prabhat Ranjan</string-name>
          <email>prof.prabhat.ranjan@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, Department of Software Engineering</institution>
          ,
          <country country="ET">Ethiopia</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Vice Chancellor, D Y Patil International University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Pune</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IN">India</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Introduction: Emotion is playing a great role in our daily lives. Traditional ap proaches of emotion recognition are performed based on the features including facial images, measurements of heart rates, blood pressure, temperatures, tones of voice/ speech, etc. However, these features can potentially be changed to fake features by a person while it is recorded. To unhide the real features, the brain signal representing the response of a person is recorded directly from his/her brain. The various ways of measuring brain waves: electroencephalogram(EEG), Magnetoencephalography(MEG), functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI), etc. For this study, EEG is chosen for emotion recognition relying on cost effectiveness and performance trade-offs. Brain computer interface(BCI) based emotion recognition is used in a vari ety of applications including advertisement, patient treatment, depression management, music player, human computer interaction, detecting children learning disabilities, assistive technologies, game playing, automatic addition of emotional pictures during conversation, emotion enabled avatar, neuromarketing ,etc.[1]. The brainwave activity is broadly divided into five frequency bands. The boundary between the frequency bands is not strict but does not vary much. The frequency bands include delta(0.5-4Hz), theta(5-8Hz), alpha(9-12Hz), beta(13-30Hz) and gamma(above 30Hz) [2,3]. The main purpose of this study is to detect emotion based on EEG signal analy sis recorded from brain in response to visual stimuli. Numerous studies demonstrated that even though it is possible to measure emotion from EEG signals recorded from stimulated brain in practice, the outputs of Brain Computer Interface(BCI) related re search works are different with same stimuli and with brain response of same or dif ferent subjects [4]. The other problem is that parts of the brain that responds to emo tion is not clearly identified or/and mixed up in research results. For example, emotion is responded either or both on frontal lobe or temporal lobe. Besides this, the brain wave containing emotion is not clearly understood to be in alpha frequency band or gamma frequency band. This problem inspires us to work on it. This study attempts to find out answers for the following research questions: (1) What regions of the brain are associated with visual emotion? (2) Which frequency bands of the brain waves are used for emotion recognition? (3) How accurately the chosen features were recognizing emotions using machine learning approaches? Methods: We collected three image data sets include: 90 sample images of Geneva Affective Picture Database (GAPED), 8 colour images and 36 Indian company logo. EMOTIV EPOC head sets, Emotiv EPOC TestBench Control panel software and EventIDE are used for EEG brain activity recording. The Spectrum Density (PSD) of</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>all 14 channels along with five frequency bands including: theta, alpha, low_beta,
high_beta and gamma frequency bands are measured. A total of 70 channels are
recorded for each of 11 subjects(person) samples for each of the three image data sets.
These bands are filtered. The proposed approach consists of six stages: image
stimulus presentation, subjects, EEG signal recordings, signal filtering, feature extraction
and classification. See Fig. 1 of Appendix. For pre-processing and building machine
learning models, weka software environment is used.</p>
      <p>
        Results: To answer research question one and two, the top ranked features for each
subject are extracted using Relief algorithm in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]. The brain frequency bands where
it has top ranked features are counted for each subject. On the basis of this, 37.5% of
the subjects responded to emotional images with alpha brain waves. Alpha waves is
dominant feature which carries the most of all brain waves. The brain frequency
bands and the channel numbers are counted in each of the three experiments on the
three data sets. With similar approach, we empirically observed that the frontal lobe
of human brain is more responsible for emotional function than other parts of cerebral
cortex. We split the filtered data into train and test sets. We trained the most popular
supervised machine learning (Bayesian Network, J48(decision tree), Adaboost(meta
learner) and Random forest). After fine tuning the parameters of the selected machine
learning models, the performances of these models are tested on test sets. The inten
tion is to use these machine learning models to predict the emotion type
(positive/negative) in response to the presented stimuli using test sets. The performance of these
models are tested. For the three data sets, the average accuracy of machine learning
algorithms (i.e. J48, Bayes Net, Adaboost and Random Forest) is 78.86, 74.76, 77.82
and 82.46, respectively. For more detail, see Table 1 of Appendix.
      </p>
      <p>Conclusions: For feature selection, we used relief algorithm along with ranking
algorithm. Because this feature evaluation algorithm is more appropriate for recognizing
relevant features from irrelevant feature that may cause degrading the performance of
machine learning algorithm. In this study, we tried to address three key issues. First,
we empirically identified the brain regions which are more responsible for emotion.
On the basis of feature evaluation result, frontal lobe is more emotionally informative
than other regions of the brain. Second, alpha frequency bands are more discriminator
than other brain frequency waves for emotion recognition.</p>
      <p>
        In addition, this study attempts to develop an EEG based Emotion recognition of
image stimuli. It is constrained by a number of challenges dominantly lack of quality in
the recording of EEG data. The level of attention of subjects, the variability arise in
multiple session, the variability caused by muscle movement, the variability due to
machine noise, differing physiology of subjects, differ cognitive patterns and differing
behavior of subjects [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]. We achieved encouraging results. The EEG based approach
is tested for logo color preference detection in the context of neuromarketing. The re
sults empirically demonstrated detection of the favorite color preferences of the
customers in response to the logo color of an organization or service. For interested re
searchers, we recommend to work on EEG based researches in the areas of
neuromarketing, TV ads evaluation, product branding, product preferences, disability treat
ment, stress management, just to name a few.
      </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            <surname>Sourina</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. K.</given-names>
            <surname>Nguyen</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Real-time eeg-based emotion recognition and its applications,”</article-title>
          <source>in Transactions on computational science XII</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>256</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>277</lpage>
          , Springer,
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Hedda Šola</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Neuromarketing-science and practice,” FIP-Financije i pravo</article-title>
          , vol.
          <volume>1</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>1</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>25</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>34</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3. “Neuromarketing india.” http://neuromarketing-india.
          <source>blogspot.com/</source>
          ,
          <year>2014</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>J. M. Williams</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Deep learning and transfer learning in the classification of eeg signals</article-title>
          ,”
          <year>2017</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. F.</given-names>
            <surname>Rosario</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Thangadurai</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.,
          <article-title>“Relief: feature selection approach</article-title>
          ,”
          <source>International journal of innovative research and development</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>4</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>11</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>218</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>224</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2015</year>
          . Fig.
          <article-title>1 Proposed System Table 1. Performance of the machine learning models for the three data sets</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>