<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Arti cial Intelligence on Edge Computing: a Healthcare Scenario in Ambient Assisted Living</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Andrea Pazienza</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Giulio Mallardi</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Corrado Fasciano</string-name>
          <email>corrado.fascianog@poliba.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Felice Vitulano</string-name>
          <email>felice.vitulanog@exprivia.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Innovation Lab, Exprivia S.p.A. Via A. Olivetti 11</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Molfetta (I-70056)</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Polytechnic University of Bari</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Via E. Orabona 4</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Bari (I-70125)</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The aging population brings many challenges surrounding the quality of life for older people and their carers, as well as impacts on the healthcare market. Several initiatives all over the world have focused on the problem of helping the aging population with Arti cial Intelligence (AI) technology, aiming at promoting a healthier society, which constitutes a main social and economic challenge. In this paper, we focus on an Ambient Assisted Living scenario in which a Smart Home Environment is carried out to assist elders at home, performing trustworthy automated complex decisions by means of IoT sensors, smart healthcare devices, and edge nodes. The core idea is to exploit the proximity between computing and information-generation sources. Taking automated complex decisions with the help AI-based techniques directly on the Edge enables a faster, more private, and context-aware Edge Computing empowering, called Edge Intelligence.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Edge Computing</kwd>
        <kwd>Edge Intelligence</kwd>
        <kwd>Healthcare</kwd>
        <kwd>Smart</kwd>
        <kwd>Home Environment</kwd>
        <kwd>Ambient Intelligence</kwd>
        <kwd>Semantic Web of Things</kwd>
        <kwd>Argumentation</kwd>
        <kwd>Decision Support Systems</kwd>
        <kwd>Explainable AI</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>One of the main issues that healthcare is facing is the aging population, which
will lead to an ever-increasing rise in the costs associated with prevention,
diagnosis, and treatments. In recent years there has been an increasing attention
on Ambient Assisted Livng (AAL) topics such as \aging well" or \domiciliary
hospitalization". In particular, the latter deals with the situation in which a
person is considered or treated as hospitalized even when he/she is at home. In
this scenario, Arti cial Intelligence (AI) techniques can play a crucial role. The
development of new AI-based techniques, supporting older adults and helping
Copyright c 2020 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative
Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
them to cope with the changes of aging and healthcare assistance, represents one
of the most advanced Information &amp; Communication Technology (ICT) areas.</p>
      <p>Thanks to the ever more availability of the Web resources, the Internet of
Things (IoT) and mobile technologies, the healthcare system has now the
possibility of moving a step forward the path of prevention, diagnosis and care to
the patient's home by delegating the use of healthcare facilities, personnel, and
machinery only in cases of urgency or specialized expertise.</p>
      <p>Due to various challenging issues such as computational complexity and more
delay in Cloud Computing, Edge Computing is an emerging paradigm and a
promising solution that pushes computing tasks and services from the network
core to the network edge. Recently, Edge Computing has overtaken the
conventional process by e ciently and fairly allocating the resources i.e., power and
battery lifetime in IoT-based industrial applications. In the meantime,
considering that AI is functionally necessary for quickly analyzing huge volumes of data
and extracting insights, there exists a strong demand to integrate Edge
Computing and AI, which gives the birth of Edge Intelligence. Moreover, Big Data has
recently gone through a radical shift of data source from the mega-scale cloud
datacenters to the increasingly widespread end-devices, e.g., mobile devices and
IoT devices. We are then facing an urgent need to push the AI frontiers to the
network edge so as to fully unleash the potential of the edge big data.</p>
      <p>Therefore, the paper aims are threefold: (i) to introduce a novel Edge
Intelligence architecture; (ii) to exploit several interrelated AI techniques that may
be involved in an Edge Computing solution; and, (iii) to present a novel
fulledge platform, called eLifeCare, which is enhanced by the In-Edge computation
of AI-based techniques to perform reliable decision-making activities in a high
complexity scenario such as the healthcare domiciliary hospitalization in an AAL
fashion.</p>
      <p>This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 provides an overview of related
work and technologies which were investigated as background knowledge.
Section 3 describes the architecture of our proposal, taking into account all the
requirements coming from di erent disciplines of AI, and introduces the eLifeCare
platform. Section 4 describes the possible scenarios of application speci cally
designed for our approach, such as Healthcare in AAL. Finally, Section 5 discusses
the proposed framework and concludes the paper, outlining future works.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Background and Related Work</title>
      <p>In this section we will cover all the basics and recent state-of-the-art of Edge
Intelligence and AI-based reasoning tasks useful to present the architecture of
our proposed platform.
2.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Edge Intelligence</title>
        <p>
          Pushing the AI frontier to the edge ecosystem that resides at the last mile
of the Internet is highly non-trivial, due to the concerns on performance, cost
and privacy. Essentially, the physical proximity between the computing and
information-generation sources promises several bene ts compared to the
traditional cloud-based computing paradigm, including low-latency, energy-e ciency,
privacy protection, reduced bandwidth consumption, on-premises and
contextawareness [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">37</xref>
          ]. On the one side, Edge Computing aims at coordinating a
multitude of collaborative edge devices and servers to process the generated data in
proximity; on the other side, AI strives for simulating intelligent human behavior
in devices/machines by learning from data. Besides enjoying the general bene ts
of edge computing, pushing AI to the edge further bene ts each other.
        </p>
        <p>
          Edge Intelligence does not necessarily mean that the AI model is fully trained
or inferred at the edge, but can work in a cloud-edge-device coordination manner
via data o oading. As shown in Figure 1, as the level of Edge Intelligence goes
higher, the amount and path length of data o oading reduce. As a result, the
transmission latency of data o oading decreases, the data privacy increases
and the WAN bandwidth cost reduces. However, this is achieved at the cost
of increased computational latency and energy consumption. The surge of IoT
devices makes the Internet of Everything (IoE) a reality [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>
          ]. More and more
data is created by widespread and geographically distributed mobile and IoT
devices, other than the mega-scale cloud datacenters. Edge Computing provides
AI also with scenarios and platforms. Many more application scenarios, such as
Industry 4:0, Healthcare, and Territorial Control, can leverage data into more
useful information and interoperable industrial control networks to put humans
in the loop, connecting them in a more relevant, valuable ways [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">26</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>
          Regarding Edge Intelligence scenarios speci cally in the area of AAL, [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
          ]
proposed an agent-based system that works in an SHE scenario, which is in
charge of handling the di erent features and capabilities of a situation-aware
environment, ensuring suitable contextualized and personalized support to the
users actions, adaptivity to the user's status and needs and to changes over time,
and automated management of the environment itself. While, focusing on the
Healthcare domain, [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>
          ] proposed a Telemedicine Platform for the treatment,
care, and early prevention of the patient with a strong passage from the
hospital to the domestic dimension (called also proximity medicine), through the
exploitation of advanced sensors for monitoring and administering patient
homebased therapies, including also data analytics. In [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>
          ] it is proposed to exploit
the concept of Fog Computing in Healthcare IoT systems by forming a
geodistributed intermediary layer of intelligence between sensor nodes and Cloud.
Instead, [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>
          ] proposed an architecture for IoT based u-healthcare monitoring
with the motivation and advantages of Cloud to Fog (C2F) computing which
interacts more by serving closer to the edge (end-points) at smart Homes and
hospitals. In [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
          ] it is proposed a three layer patient-driven Healthcare
architecture for real-time data collection, processing and transmission, giving insights to
the end-users for the applicability of fog devices and gateways in Healthcare 4.0
environment. While, [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
          ] proposed the Edge-Cognitive-Computing-based
(ECCbased) smart-healthcare system, able to monitor and analyze the physical health
of users using cognitive computing, and performing optimal computing resource
allocation of the whole edge computing network comprehensively according to
the health-risk grade of each user.
        </p>
        <p>
          Recently, in [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">35</xref>
          ] an AI-driven mechanism for Edge Computing is proposed
as a dynamic approach to adapt the running time of sensing and transmission
processes in IoT-based portable devices. Contrariwise, in [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>
          ] advances AI
mechanism of Computer Vision and Conversational Interfaces are deployed on the
devices to improve smart manufacturing processes. Thus, we have to distinguish
two di erent approaches of Edge-AI. On the one hand, AI for edge is a research
direction focusing on providing a better solution to the constrained optimization
problems in Edge Computing with the help of popular and e ective AI
technologies. Here, AI is used for energizing edge with more intelligence and optimality
[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
          ]. On the other hand, AI on edge studies how to carry out the entire process of
AI models on edge. It is a paradigm of running AI models training and inference
with cloud-edge-device synergy, which aims at extracting insights from massive
and distributed edge data with the satisfaction of algorithm performance, cost,
privacy, reliability, and e ciency [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>
          Our research is broadly situated in the latter purpose of Edge Intelligence.
Further, our contribution is placed in a scenario where the convergence of
multiple AI-technologies allow us to automate complex decision-making activities
resulting from a multi-strategic inference approach. In fact, the scope of Edge
Intelligence should not be restricted to running AI models, referring exclusively to
Machine Learning (ML) or Deep Learning (DL) models [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">36</xref>
          ]. We believe instead
that Edge Intelligence should be the paradigm that fully exploits the available
data and resources across the hierarchy of end-devices, edge nodes and cloud
datacenters to optimize the overall performances of various di erent AI
techniques:
{ ML/DL (training &amp; inferring) models;
{ Knowledge Representation (KR) and Semantic Web Technologies for IoT;
{ Reasoning over uncertain, partial, and con icting information.
To this end, we can achieve trustable and explainable results, insomuch that an
AI distributed at the edge of a multi-IoT network, such as in a Smart Home
Environment (SHE), would justify its decisions in a reliable and transparent
way.
2.2
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>Knowledge Representation with Semantic Web of Things</title>
        <p>
          The Semantic Web of Things (SWoT) is an emerging paradigm in ICT, joining
the Semantic Web and IoT. On the one side, the Semantic Web initiative aims
at allowing software agents to share, reuse and combine information available
in the World Wide Web [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
          ]. On the other side, the IoT vision promotes on a
global scale the pervasive computing paradigm, which aims at embedding
intelligence into ordinary objects and physical locations by means of a large number
of heterogeneous micro-devices, each conveying a small amount of information
[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">31</xref>
          ]. Consequently, as we can see from Figure 2, the goal of SWoT is to
embed semantically rich and easily accessible information into the physical world,
by enabling storage and retrieval of annotations from such tiny smart objects
[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">28</xref>
          ]. These capabilities enable new classes of smart applications and services by
augmenting real-world object, locations and events with semantically rich and
machine-understandable information.
        </p>
        <p>
          SWoT environments are intrinsically dynamic: the availability of hosts, data
sources and services can vary frequently and unpredictably, due to device and
people mobility, battery limitations and wireless networks unreliability [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">30</xref>
          ]. The
SWoT vision has signi cant impact also on human-computer interaction
models, with the goal of reducing the amount of user e ort and attention required
in order to bene t from computing systems. Such a vision requires an increased
exibility and autonomy of ubiquitous knowledge-based systems in information
encoding, management, dissemination and discovery. User agents running on
mobile personal devices are designed to be able in dynamically discovering the best
available resources according to users pro le and preferences, in order to support
her current tasks through unobtrusive and context-dependent suggestions [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">32</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>
          SWoT may enhance also ML classi cation tasks by merging ontology-based
characterizations of data distributions with non-standard reasoning for a
negrained event detection [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">29</xref>
          ]. In this way, a classi cation problem of ML can be
treated as a resource discovery by exploiting semantic matchmaking. Outputs
of classi cation are endowed with computer-processable descriptions in standard
Semantic Web languages, while explanation of matchmaking outcomes motivates
con dence on results on a single edge node.
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>Explainable and Reliable Decision-making with Argumentation</title>
        <p>
          In AI, Abstract Argumentation is a very simple but also very powerful formalism
to reason over con icting knowledge. It studies the acceptability of arguments
based purely on their relationships and abstracted from their content. An
argument is a set of assumptions (i.e., information from which conclusions can
be drawn), together with a conclusion that can be obtained by one or more
reasoning steps. Given a problem to solve (making decision, reasoning with
uncertain information, classifying an object), arguments are di erent from proofs
in that they are defeasible, that is, a type of non-monotonic reasoning in which
the validity of their conclusions can be disputed by other arguments in the light
of new evidence. Then, Argumentation is the process by which arguments and
counterarguments are constructed and handled. Handling arguments may
involve comparing arguments, evaluating them in some respects, and judging a
constellation of arguments and counterarguments to consider whether any of
them are warranted according to some principled criterion [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>
          Basically, Abstract Argumentation, introduced by Dung [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
          ], is a graph-based
formalism to reason over con icting knowledge without considering the internal
structure of the arguments but only on their relations of attack, denoting the
con icts between the arguments, and a semantics for evaluating them, i.e.
assessing to what extent each argument is acceptable.
        </p>
        <p>
          Building appropriate argumentation formalism can cause much more concern
than expected. Attention must be paid to avoid the risk of violating some
natural rationality postulates [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
          ] in the overall instantiation-based argumentation
        </p>
        <p>0:6
0:7</p>
        <p>
          0:5
0:3
process. Here, generating proper argumentation structures is the key to
obtaining reasonable and consistent output. Dung's original formalism for abstract
argumentation has been extended along many lines giving rise to a large and
thriving literature in AI (see [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref34">34, 1</xref>
          ] for an overview). Most relevant frameworks
may consider a support relation alongside the attack relation [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
          ] (leading to a
notion of bipolar frameworks), or may add quantitative information to empower
the strength of (attack) relations [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref13">13, 10</xref>
          ], others assign a preference between
arguments [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref21">21, 2</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>
          A Bipolar Weighted AF (BWAF ) [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23 ref24">24, 23</xref>
          ] incorporates two of most
important generalizations of Dung-style AFs: the bipolar AF (BAF), and weighted AF
(WAF). The idea behind it is to allow not only weighted attack relations between
abstract arguments, but also weighted support relations. This is achieved by
assigning to each relation a weight which can be positive or negative. As depicted
in Figure 3, a BWAF can be represented as a directed graph whose nodes
represent arguments, relations represent attacks (with normal arcs) and supports
(with dashed arcs), and weights represent the relative strength of relations.
        </p>
        <p>
          This representation has been chosen as the most convenient and suitable
to reason over partial and/or inconsistent knowledge conveyed by devices in
an Edge Intelligence system. In fact, giving the sensors, actuators, and other
edge devices the faculty of arguing about the information they are conveying,
it follows that the whole IoT network and Edge infrastructure would become
smarter and more reliable. Devices would become able to perform operations
such as processing data on Edge so as to produce higher-level information and
autonomously deciding their own course of actions toward the achievement of
their (individual or collectively shared) goals [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
          ]. With argumentation, smart
devices will be capable of explaining their behavior and motivating their choices
and decisions, also improving their capability of interaction with
humans-in-theloop.
3
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Exprivia's AI on Edge</title>
      <p>In this section we rstly present a generic Edge Computing architecture that
exploits several AI techniques to optimize healthcare in a SHE autonomous
setting, and then we focus on eLifeCare, that is our platform in which AI on
Edge is actually performed.
We have to deal with and Edge Computing architecture so that processing can be
done at the devices (i.e., end-nodes), or at the gateways (i.e., edge nodes). This
will reduce unnecessary data tra c and processing latency, and is important
for applications such as critical patient monitoring and analysis. Focus is placed
on designing and developing edge nodes, with associated end-nodes for various
patient monitoring applications. In this complex scenario, we deal with a large
scale of heterogeneous devices as edge nodes in an IoT environment, which,
at di erent levels of abstractions and di erent roles, communicate and convey
di erent kinds of information:
1. End-nodes / Device Layer:
{ Simple, Complex sensor;
{ Mobile, Wearable, Embedded devices;
{ Actuators.
2. Edge nodes / Edge Layer:
{ Gateway, Sink devices;
{ Fog, Decider nodes.
3. Cloud Datacenter / Cloud Layer.</p>
      <p>In an healthcare scenario, end-nodes can be distinguished in a further
taxonomy, as shown in Figure 4:
1. Medical Devices : any device intended to be used for medical purposes, such
as the diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, treatment, alleviation or
compensation of a disease or an injury.
2. Ambient Devices : any type of consumer electronics, characterized by their
ability to be perceived at-a-glance, such as motion sensors, cameras, smoke
sensors, smart appliances, etc.
3. Interactive Devices : any mobile or stationary hardware component which
enables the interaction between the human user and an application or the
environment of the user, such as smartphones, speech recognition devices,
wearable devices, etc.</p>
      <p>
        Here an edge node can be nearby end-device connectable by device-to-device
(D2D) communications [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ], a server attached to an access point (e.g., WiFi,
router, base station), a network gateway, or even a micro-datacenter available
for use by nearby devices.
      </p>
      <p>Focusing on AI, we envision a Edge Computing network capable of
performing not only data analysis, classi cation, regression and/or clustering via ML/DL
online training and inference, but also a wider range of AI techniques, adding a
context-awareness and explainability/reliability of results. In this vision, ML/DL
models are deployed in a hybrid mode which combines the decentralized
training/inferring mode with a centralized revised/re ned mode.</p>
      <p>As shown in Figure 5, the edge servers may train the ML/DL model by
either decentralized updates with each other or centralized training with the
cloud datacenter. The hybrid architecture is also called as Cloud-Edge-Device
training due to the involved roles. As the hub of the ML/DL architecture is
placed as close as possible to end-nodes and edge nodes, there is an improvement
of performances regarding the training loss, convergence, privacy, communication
cost, latency, and energy e ciency.</p>
      <p>The structure of such a complex heterogeneous network of edge nodes may
have a pyramidal topology, as in Figure 4. In this con guration, the nodes at
the upper level are intended to have a di erent role since at a higher level of
\abstraction" of the heterogeneous network, and may, therefore, have di erent
tasks from the end-nodes, not excluding that they may include an exclusive
partial knowledge over the entire network. Therefore, they can act as simple
collectors of information deriving from groups of sensors, or from aggregators of
such information, or they can make further processing steps on the edge network.
A key issue in this complex scenario is that of the truthfulness and reliability of
information gathered by groups of heterogeneous sensors that can:
{ detect con icting information within a end-nodes and/or edge nodes;
{ group information at di erent levels of abstraction;
{ perform partial processing at the Edge Layer.</p>
      <p>In particular, an Edge Intelligence task could be performed either with partial
ML/DL model training or with speci c inference and reasoning tasks on the data
collected through semantic descriptions and ontological dictionaries. A certain
degree of uncertainty or inconsistency is likely to arise from all the partial small
amount of processed data by any type of device in the heterogeneous network.</p>
      <p>Therefore, a key problem regards to evaluate the reliability (or justi
ability) and explainability of the partial results from the entire network. Moreover,
such information may be con icting, yielding the system unable to take
autonomous trustable decisions. A computational model of argumentation, such as
the BWAF, could solve two types of inconsistencies between con icting
information:
1. in a \horizontal" way, it can resolve the con icts created by the end-nodes
that transmit similar but con icting information;
2. in a \vertical" way, it can solve problems of con icting knowledge between
the information (possibly aggregated) sent by the lower levels of the
pyramid towards the higher levels, in which an inconsistency is found between
partially disjointed knowledge between the end-nodes and edge-nodes.</p>
      <p>The automatic building of an argumentation framework like the BWAF and
its subsequent evaluation through argumentative semantics for the selection of
acceptable arguments is a perfect solution in this context. Speci cally, endowing
the information coming from end-nodes and edge nodes with semantic
annotations allows a machine-understandable representation of information that can be
exploited to automatically build the BWAF, which can give a representation of
con icting and/or supporting arguments of the entire network. In particular, the
non-standard inference method of semantic matchmaking between pairs of
arguments is employed to de ne a weighted notion of relation between arguments
(i.e., attack or support).</p>
      <p>From the result obtained it will therefore be possible to be certain of the
truthfulness and reliability of the information detected and processed at the
Edge, in a heterogeneous and complex multi-IoT network, which can be crucial
when a complex decision is automatically taken.
3.2</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>The eLifeCare Platform</title>
        <p>The eLifeCare platform is the Telemedicine system that contains the set of
solutions and services provided by Exprivia for Teleconsulting, Telereporting,
Telepresence and Telemonitoring to support all operators involved in the care and
monitoring of the patient at home (see Figure 6).</p>
        <p>The eLifeCare platform revolutionizes the approach to home patient care in
that it provides the technological Edge Computing infrastructure and all the
services necessary for the full, integrated management of all the care-giving
processes and services, accessible and usable from any kind of IoT device:
{ Remote monitoring;
{ Telemedicine and Teleconsulting;
{ Medicinal product procurement monitoring;
{ Reporting and ling systems;
{ Patient's medical history in electronic folders.</p>
        <p>The eLifeCare platform deals with the new Digital Health challenge that puts
the patient at the centre and guarantees continuous services that improve quality
https://www.exprivia.it/exprivia-resources/images/File/
yer-healthcare-052018/italiano/20180522 004-0 EXPITL H FS eLifeCare ITA.pdf
of life and, at the same time, help to limit the costs of the local health authorities
and hospitals by removing the patient from hospital. The platform is based on a
WebApplication used to monitor and manage all patients in real time, acting as
an operating intermediary between the patient and the medical team or specialist
that is following the patient. The full-Edge architecture of the platform allows
the medical team to perform AI-driven autonomous decisions for a single patient
at home, according to his clinical record data on the treatment, vital parameters,
diagnosis, etc. If necessary, it decides to modify the treatments, sharing speci c
treatment protocols and consulting any reports in support of the treatment. The
AI on Edge component of eLifeCare gathers data from devices and performs ML
classi cation tasks to monitor the treatment process, endowing data with small
pieces of semantic annotations inferred from healthcare ontologies on the edge
nodes, and nally performing argumentation to discard the unjusti ed possible
treatments in case of therapy modi cation.</p>
        <p>The eLifeCare platform has speci c mobile applications for use by the patient
that support active participation of the patient himself, the care giver, and the
medical team allowing them the remote management of:
{ Care giving at the patient's home on the basis of the programme indicated
in the Care Plans;
{ Measurement of vital parameters;
{ Videoconsulting sessions;
{ Patient geolocation;
{ Administration of pharmacological treatment;
{ Medicinal product procurement requests.
4</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>A Healthcare Scenario in AAL</title>
      <p>As a sample scenario, consider a SHE in which the patient at home has
monitoring instruments and wearable technology, and is constantly monitored from
the Edge Computing infrastructure of heterogeneous multi-IoT network devices.
The Edge Layer coordinates and monitors the patient's care at home through
active interaction designed to detect the care needs and critical factors involved
in the care. The platform provides the operators involved with the information
about the patient by opening a clinical record (medical history, clinical diary,
treatment, vital parameters, etc.). The Cloud Layer acts as an intermediary: it
receives any requests and/or alerts sent by the Edge Layer after the
measurement of speci c vital parameters, and activates speci c operating protocols. If
the Cloud-Edge-Device coordination of AI/ML models with SWoT annotation
and inference and argumentation autonomously decides to make a change in
the patient's treatment, the platform starts Teleconsulting or Videoconsulting
session with the specialists that are following the patient to communicate the
therapy variation and send a con rmation request. Using the platform, the
specialist views the patient's clinical documentation and manages the care pathway.</p>
      <p>As brie y depicted in Figure 7, the eLifeCare platform exploits AI on the
Edge level to perform di erent kinds of reasoning an take complex autonomous</p>
      <p>Fig. 7. Healthcare Scenario in AAL
decisions at di erent layers of the Edge network. This is helpful in recognizing
the severity, timeliness, and appropriateness of intervention among the factors
determining the clinical outcome. Moreover, the platform acts as an alert
systems, such as Early Warning Scores (EWS), which help in identifying speci c
phases of illness and provide appropriate care.
5</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Concluding Remarks and Future Work</title>
      <p>Edge Intelligence, although still in its primary stage, has attracted more and
more researchers and companies to get involved in studying and using it. This
paper attempts to provide possible research opportunities about AI on Edge.
Concretely, we rst discuss the relation between Edge Computing and AI. We
believe that the synergy of multiple AI-technologies allow us to automate complex
decision-making activities resulting from a multi-strategic inference approach.
In fact, we state that Edge Intelligence should be the paradigm that fully
exploits the available data and resources to optimize the overall performances of
not only Machine Learning models, but also other inference and reasoning tasks,
including Semantic Web of Things and Argumentation.</p>
      <p>
        In particular, semantic-enhanced ML on heterogeneous data streams in the
IoT allows a mapping of raw data to ontology-based concept labels, providing
a low-level semantic interpretation of the statistical distribution of information,
while the conjunctive aggregation of concept components allows building
automatically a rich and meaningful representation of events during the model
training phase. Speci cally, the exploitation of non-standard inferences for
matchmaking enables a ne-grained event detection by treating the ML classi cation
problem as a resource discovery. In particular, Mini-ME [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">33</xref>
        ] is an extremely
lightweight reasoning engine, conceived especially for SWoT applications, which,
thanks to its non-standard Semantic Web services [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ], is the candidate reasoning
tool to perform KR tasks on Edge in ubiquitous scenarios, where mobile agents
must provide quick decision support and/or on-the- y organization in
intrinsically unpredictable environments. While, exploiting argumentation within this
domain potentially presents several advantages:
{ explainability : decision making based on argumentation, leveraging
declarative approaches, make decisions amenable of interpretation, so that any
action may be easily explained and justi ed by a chain of arguments both
to human users or supervisor systems.
{ security : it is naturally supported, despite uncertainty of perceptions and
system openness. Argumentation in fact, on the one hand enables reaching
consensus despite discrepancies in measured metrics by guaranteeing that
only well-backed claims win a debate, on the other hand may be used to
spot malicious behaviors by proof-checking false claims.
{ reliability : if users can get justi cations about why a system is pursuing a
given course of actions, and how it came up with a precise conclusion about
the state of the world, they are likely to increase their con dence in relying
on the autonomous capabilities of the system.
      </p>
      <p>We also showed how all these AI techniques promote and reinforce each other
by presenting a novel Edge Computing architecture and the eLifeCare platform,
speci cally designed for healthcare, outlining also a use case scenario in SHE.</p>
      <p>Looking at future work, the progressive deployment of 5G networks will make
available a backbone with signi cantly enhanced spectral e ciency, improved
signal e ciency and signi cantly reduced latency, all factors that will facilitate
new services in the healthcare domain. There will be a change of paradigm from
\hospital based" to \distributed patient care".</p>
      <p>This approach can then be re ned if dynamic networks are also taken into
account, in which the Edge nodes change over time, introducing or eliminating
information in the Edge network.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Baroni</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gabbay</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Giacomin</surname>
          </string-name>
          , M.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>van der Torre</surname>
          </string-name>
          , L.:
          <article-title>Handbook of Formal Argumentation</article-title>
          , vol.
          <volume>1</volume>
          .
          <string-name>
            <given-names>College</given-names>
            <surname>Publications</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bench-Capon</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.J.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Doutre</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dunne</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Value-based argumentation frameworks</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Arti cial Intelligence</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>444</volume>
          {
          <issue>453</issue>
          (
          <year>2002</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Berners-Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hendler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lassila</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , et al.:
          <article-title>The semantic web</article-title>
          . Scienti c american
          <volume>284</volume>
          (
          <issue>5</issue>
          ),
          <volume>28</volume>
          {
          <fpage>37</fpage>
          (
          <year>2001</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Besnard</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hunter</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Elements of Argumentation</article-title>
          . The MIT Press (
          <year>2008</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Caminada</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Amgoud</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms</article-title>
          .
          <source>Arti cial Intelligence</source>
          <volume>171</volume>
          (
          <issue>5-6</issue>
          ),
          <volume>286</volume>
          {
          <fpage>310</fpage>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cayrol</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lagasquie-Schiex</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning</source>
          and Uncertainty,
          <source>ECSQARU. Lecture Notes in Computer Science</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>3571</volume>
          , pp.
          <volume>378</volume>
          {
          <fpage>389</fpage>
          . Springer (
          <year>2005</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Li</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hao</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Qian</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Humar</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Edge cognitive computing based smart healthcare system</article-title>
          .
          <source>Future Generation Computer Systems</source>
          <volume>86</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>403</fpage>
          {
          <fpage>411</fpage>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gao</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Exploiting massive d2d collaboration for energy-e cient mobile edge computing</article-title>
          .
          <source>IEEE Wireless Communications</source>
          <volume>24</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <volume>64</volume>
          {
          <fpage>71</fpage>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Colucci</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Di Noia,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Pinto</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Ruta</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Ragone</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Tinelli</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E.:
          <article-title>A nonmonotonic approach to semantic matchmaking and request re nement in e-marketplaces</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Journal of Electronic Commerce</source>
          <volume>12</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <volume>127</volume>
          {
          <fpage>154</fpage>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Coste-Marquis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Konieczny</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Marquis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ouali</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Selecting extensions in weighted argumentation frameworks</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>342</volume>
          {
          <issue>349</issue>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Deng</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhao</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dustdar</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zomaya</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Edge intelligence: the con uence of edge computing and arti cial intelligence</article-title>
          . arXiv preprint arXiv:
          <year>1909</year>
          .
          <volume>00560</volume>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dung</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games</article-title>
          .
          <source>Arti cial intelligence</source>
          <volume>77</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <volume>321</volume>
          {
          <fpage>357</fpage>
          (
          <year>1995</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dunne</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hunter</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>McBurney</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Parsons</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wooldridge</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Weighted argument systems: Basic de nitions, algorithms, and complexity results</article-title>
          .
          <source>Arti cial Intelligence</source>
          <volume>175</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <volume>457</volume>
          {
          <fpage>486</fpage>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ferilli</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>De Carolis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pazienza</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Esposito</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Redavid</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>An agent architecture for adaptive supervision and control of smart environments</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: PECCS 2015 - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Pervasive and Embedded Computing and Communication Systems</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>160</volume>
          {
          <issue>167</issue>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jara</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Olivieri</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bocchi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jung</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kastner</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Skarmeta</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Semantic web of things: an analysis of the application semantics for the iot moving towards the iot convergence</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Journal of Web and Grid Services</source>
          <volume>10</volume>
          (
          <issue>2- 3</issue>
          ),
          <volume>244</volume>
          {
          <fpage>272</fpage>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kumari</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tanwar</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tyagi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kumar</surname>
          </string-name>
          , N.:
          <article-title>Fog computing for healthcare 4.0 environment: Opportunities and challenges</article-title>
          .
          <source>Computers &amp; Electrical Engineering</source>
          <volume>72</volume>
          ,
          <issue>1</issue>
          {
          <fpage>13</fpage>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          17.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lippi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mamei</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mariani</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zambonelli</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>An argumentation-based perspective over the social iot</article-title>
          .
          <source>IEEE Internet of Things Journal</source>
          <volume>5</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <volume>2537</volume>
          {
          <fpage>2547</fpage>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          18.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Loven</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Leppanen, T.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Peltonen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Partala</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Harjula</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Porambage</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ylianttila</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Riekki</surname>
          </string-name>
          , J.:
          <article-title>Edgeai: A vision for distributed, edge-native arti cial intelligence in future 6g networks</article-title>
          .
          <source>The 1st 6G Wireless</source>
          Summit pp.
          <volume>1</volume>
          {
          <issue>2</issue>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          19.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mallardi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mariani</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Altomare</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Maruccia</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vitulano</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bellifemine</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Telemedicine solutions and services: a new challenge that supports active participation of patients</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: i-CiTies</source>
          <year>2017</year>
          (
          <article-title>3rd CINI Annual Conference on ICT for Smart Cities</article-title>
          &amp; Communities) (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          20.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Miraz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ali</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Excell</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Picking</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>A review on internet of things (iot), internet of everything (ioe) and internet of nano things (iont)</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: 2015 Internet Technologies and Applications (ITA)</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>219</volume>
          {
          <fpage>224</fpage>
          .
          <string-name>
            <surname>IEEE</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          21.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Modgil</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks</article-title>
          .
          <source>Arti cial Intelligence</source>
          <volume>173</volume>
          (
          <issue>9</issue>
          ),
          <volume>901</volume>
          {
          <fpage>934</fpage>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          22.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nandyala</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kim</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>From cloud to fog and iot-based real-time u-healthcare monitoring for smart homes and hospitals</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Journal of Smart Home</source>
          <volume>10</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <volume>187</volume>
          {
          <fpage>196</fpage>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation>
          23.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pazienza</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ferilli</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Esposito</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Constructing and evaluating bipolar weighted argumentation frameworks for online debating systems</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Advances In Argumentation In Arti cial Intelligence</source>
          co
          <article-title>-located with XVI International Conference of the Italian Association for Arti cial Intelligence, AI3@AI*IA 2017</article-title>
          . pp.
          <volume>111</volume>
          {
          <issue>125</issue>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation>
          24.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pazienza</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ferilli</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Esposito</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>On the gradual acceptability of arguments in bipolar weighted argumentation frameworks with degrees of trust</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Foundations of Intelligent Systems - 23rd International Symposium, ISMIS</source>
          <year>2017</year>
          ,
          <article-title>Proceedings</article-title>
          . pp.
          <volume>195</volume>
          {
          <issue>204</issue>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <mixed-citation>
          25.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pazienza</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Macchiarulo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vitulano</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fiorentini</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cammisa</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rigutini</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Di Iorio</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Globo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Trevisi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>A novel integrated industrial approach with cobots in the age of industry 4.0 through conversational interaction and computer vision</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the Sixth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics</source>
          (CLiC-it
          <year>2019</year>
          ) (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref26">
        <mixed-citation>
          26.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pazienza</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Polimeno</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vitulano</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Maruccia</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Towards a digital future: an innovative semantic IoT integrated platform for industry 4.0, healthcare, and territorial control</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics</source>
          (SMC). pp.
          <volume>587</volume>
          {
          <issue>592</issue>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref27">
        <mixed-citation>
          27.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rahmani</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gia</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Negash</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Anzanpour</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Azimi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jiang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Liljeberg</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Exploiting smart e-health gateways at the edge of healthcare internetof-things: A fog computing approach</article-title>
          .
          <source>Future Generation Computer Systems</source>
          <volume>78</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>641</fpage>
          {
          <fpage>658</fpage>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref28">
        <mixed-citation>
          28.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ruta</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Scioscia</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Di Sciascio</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E.:
          <article-title>Enabling the semantic web of things: framework and architecture</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: 2012 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Semantic Computing</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>345</volume>
          {
          <fpage>347</fpage>
          .
          <string-name>
            <surname>IEEE</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref29">
        <mixed-citation>
          29.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ruta</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Scioscia</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Loseto</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pinto</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Di Sciascio</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E.:
          <article-title>Machine learning in the internet of things: a semantic-enhanced approach</article-title>
          .
          <source>Semantic Web (Preprint)</source>
          ,
          <volume>1</volume>
          {
          <fpage>22</fpage>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref30">
        <mixed-citation>
          30.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ruta</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Scioscia</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pinto</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gramegna</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ieva</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Loseto</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Di</given-names>
            <surname>Sciascio</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E.:
          <article-title>Coap-based collaborative sensor networks in the semantic web of things</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing</source>
          <volume>10</volume>
          (
          <issue>7</issue>
          ),
          <volume>2545</volume>
          {
          <fpage>2562</fpage>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref31">
        <mixed-citation>
          31.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Satyanarayanan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , et al.:
          <article-title>Pervasive computing: Vision and challenges</article-title>
          .
          <source>IEEE Personal communications 8(4)</source>
          ,
          <volume>10</volume>
          {
          <fpage>17</fpage>
          (
          <year>2001</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref32">
        <mixed-citation>
          32.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Scioscia</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ruta</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Loseto</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gramegna</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ieva</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pinto</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Di Sciascio</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E.:
          <article-title>A mobile matchmaker for the ubiquitous semantic web</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS) 10(4)</source>
          ,
          <volume>77</volume>
          {
          <fpage>100</fpage>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref33">
        <mixed-citation>
          33.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Scioscia</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ruta</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Loseto</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gramegna</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ieva</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pinto</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Di Sciascio</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E.:
          <article-title>Mini-me matchmaker and reasoner for the semantic web of things</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Innovations, Developments, and Applications of Semantic Web and Information Systems</source>
          , pp.
          <volume>262</volume>
          {
          <fpage>294</fpage>
          .
          <string-name>
            <given-names>IGI</given-names>
            <surname>Global</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref34">
        <mixed-citation>
          34.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Simari</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rahwan</surname>
          </string-name>
          , I. (eds.):
          <source>Argumentation in Arti cial Intelligence</source>
          . Springer (
          <year>2009</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref35">
        <mixed-citation>
          35.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sodhro</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pirbhulal</surname>
          </string-name>
          , S.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>de Albuquerque</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.H.C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Arti cial intelligence driven mechanism for edge computing based industrial applications</article-title>
          .
          <source>IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics</source>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref36">
        <mixed-citation>
          36.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Han,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Zhao</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Q.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Chen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Chen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.:</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>In-edge ai: Intelligentizing mobile edge computing, caching and communication by federated learning</article-title>
          .
          <source>IEEE Network</source>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref37">
        <mixed-citation>
          37.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhou</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Li</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zeng</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Luo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , J.:
          <article-title>Edge intelligence: Paving the last mile of arti cial intelligence with edge computing</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proceedings of the IEEE</source>
          <volume>107</volume>
          (
          <issue>8</issue>
          ),
          <volume>1738</volume>
          {
          <fpage>1762</fpage>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>