<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Towards a Temporal Deep Learning Model to Support Sustainable Agricultural Practices</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Agustin Garcia Pereira</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Lukasz Porwol</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Adegboyega Ojo</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Edward Curry</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Applied Informatics, Faculty of Management and Economics, Gdańsk University of Technology</institution>
          ,
          <country country="PL">Poland</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Insight Centre for Data Analytics</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>NUI Galway</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IE">Ireland</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The impressive results of deep learning in many different fields, specifically in remote sensing, together with the growing availability of open Earth Observation data creates new opportunities to address global problems. One such global problem is associated with the simplification and intensification of agricultural systems which threatens the worldwide sustainability of crop production. Despite the fact that a plethora of satellite images describe a given location on earth every year, very few deep learning-based solutions have harnessed the temporal and sequential dynamics of land use to map sustainable and unsustainable cropping practices. In this paper, we present the preliminary results of a set of experiments conducted using one-dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) for classifying multispectral time series derived from Landsat satellites constellation. The experimental data is related to agricultural practices in Sacramento County, California, United States of America. We discuss the applicability of this approach for mapping sustainable crop rotationbased practices which have been proven to mitigate the environmental impact of agricultural land use dynamics.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>AI</kwd>
        <kwd>Deep Learning</kwd>
        <kwd>Satellite Images</kwd>
        <kwd>Sustainable Agriculture</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        Confronted with important global problems related to agriculture sustainability, food
security, climate change, and biodiversity loss, new ecological movements across the
world are promoting a set of “ecological intensification” principles, as an alternative
paradigm to mainstream agricultural practices [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref2 ref3">1–3</xref>
        ]. Practices such as intercropping,
double cropping, crop rotations and the use of cover crops have been shown to
increase agriculture sustainability [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]. There is an increasing tendency among farmers,
decision-makers, and society in general to establish cropping systems that allow, not
only the maximization of crop yield but also the provision of ecosystem benefits [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ].
In this regard, the need for spatial information about agricultural practices is expected
to grow rapidly [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ], and remote sensing has been shown to be an effective tool for
monitoring the land surface properties resulting from human practices. Despite
significant efforts made in this area, an extensive literature review shows that only 9% of
the total remote sensing and agriculture publications focus on cropping practices [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Recent applications of deep learning in many fields, including remote sensing,
together with the increasing availability of free satellite images with higher spectral,
spatial and temporal resolutions, creates new opportunities to tackle global
challenges. Deep learning-based models have the ability to learn feature representations
exclusively from raw data without the need for domain-specific knowledge. This fact,
together with the advances in computational power, has encouraged the use of deep
neural networks for many tasks, including image classification, object detection,
semantic segmentation and anomaly detection [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7 ref8">7, 8</xref>
        ] in remotely sensed imagery.
However, most recent AI models or classifiers used in operational mapping generally use
single date spectral data for classification [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ] and do not harness the temporal
resolution of remotely sensed time-series images.
      </p>
      <p>In this work, we present a set of experiments using Convolutional Neural Networks
(CNNs) with convolutions in the temporal dimension and more than 400,000
remotely sensed time series data to classify land use and agricultural practices.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Related Work</title>
      <p>
        Zhong, Liheng et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ] have exploited the intrinsic characteristics of time-series
data to describe seasonal patterns and sequential relationships for classifying summer
crops. They developed different deep neural network architectures and used Enhanced
Vegetation Index (EVI) calculated from Landsat Level 2 product imagery bands and
ground in-situ data from California Department of Water Resources. Their results,
based on an architecture that includes one-dimension convolution and an inception
module, outperformed traditional algorithms for land use classification including
XGBoost, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine and recurrent deep neural
networks. Pelletier et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ] proposed a temporal convolutional neural network
constructed with three convolutional layers, a dense layer and finally, a SoftMax layer.
Different to [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ], the authors of this study used three spectral bands of the available
satellite imagery. Results show that the proposed architecture outperformed Random
Forest algorithm by 2 to 3 % and based on the evidence gathered they point out the
importance of using both spectral and temporal dimensions when computing the
convolutions. Cai et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ] developed a deep learning architecture to train a model able
to classify corn and soybean fields. They used a combination of Landsat-5, Landsat-7
and Landsat-8 satellite images time-series covering a period of sixteen years. They
report an overall accuracy of 97%.
3
3.1
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Data</title>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Study Area</title>
        <p>
          The setting of the study is a surface of 4466 km2 or 1724 square miles in Sacramento
County, in the west part of the United States of America and encompasses a one-year
period ranging from January 2015 to December 2015. Fig. 1 shows the delimited
surface. The annual mean temperature in this area is 16.1 °C with a monthly daily
average temperature ranging from 8.0 °C in December and 24.2 °C in July. The wet
season period extends from October to April. The region of Sacramento has a strong
agricultural tradition and remains an important economic force not only in California
but also at a national level [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>Fig. 1. Study Area, Sacramento County, United States of America. The red thick line delimits
the region of interest for this study and the green polygons represent the agricultural fields our
experiments and analysis will be based on.
3.2</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Ground Truth Data</title>
        <p>In this study, the 2015 Sacramento County land use survey was used as a source of
“ground truth” data. The Survey was developed by the State of California,
Department of Water Resources (DWR). The main goal of this survey is to map agricultural
fields. In this regard, a surveyor visited almost every delineated field, providing a
high land use assessment accuracy.</p>
        <p>The dataset is distributed in a Shapefile format and consists of a total of 40205
polygons, each of them containing 29 different attributes that describe the agricultural
land use practices at the field level.
3.3</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>Satellite Imagery</title>
        <p>
          Different satellite constellations provide freely distributed images of the world surface
in a continues manner and at different spatial, spectral and time resolutions. For
instance, the two Sentinel-2 satellites provide 10m resolution imagery of the planet
surface every five days, whereas a combination of Landsat-7 and Landsat-8 satellites
offer an eight days revisit time with a 30m spatial resolution [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
          ]. Due to the fact that
satellites have been launched at different dates, a match between the ground truth data
to be used and the availability of remotely sensed data represents a strong limitation at
the time of selecting a satellite product. Considering that the land use survey
described before is based on the agricultural fields for the year 2015, a combination of
Landsat-7 and Landsat-8 was deemed as the best option. It offers an eight-days revisit
time since 2013, whereas Sentinel-2 images only offer five-days revisit time since the
year 2017.
        </p>
        <p>
          Among the available Landsat products, Landsat Level 2 is a research-quality,
application-ready science product derived from Landsat Level 1 data [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
          ] and can be
downloaded, on-demand, from USGS webpage1. The selection of this source of
remotely sensed data is motivated by the fact that these images are
radiometriccalibrated and atmospheric-corrected.
        </p>
        <p>A total of 178 Surface Reflectance image products were downloaded for the region
of interest delimited with red in Fig. 1 for the year 2015. From this set, 88 images
correspond to Landsat-8 and a total of 90 images correspond to Landsat-7. Three
bands were selected for the application of this study. The green band emphasizes peak
vegetation, which is useful for assessing plant vigor. Red Band discriminates
vegetation slopes while Near Infrared (NIR) emphasizes biomass 2. 1 summarizes the bands'
information per satellite.</p>
        <p>
          As we can see from Table 1, the spectral ranges of the different bands are slightly
different between Landsat-7 and Landsat-8. These differences have been studied in
[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
          ] suggesting that their impact on a model depends on the sensitivity of the model
in question. Studies have shown the insignificant impact of these differences on
classification models [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref12">10, 12</xref>
          ].
3.4
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-4">
        <title>Data preprocessing</title>
        <p>In order to create pixel-level labeled time-series we followed the pipeline we
proposed in a previous paper. In that contribution, we created a set of tools leveraging the
open-source Orfeo ToolBox (OTB)3 tool and we presented an end to end pipeline that
1 https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/
2
https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/what-are-best-landsat-spectral-bands-use-my-research?qtnews_science_products=7#qt-news_science_products
3 https://www.orfeo-toolbox.org
can consume a collection of satellite images and a ground in-situ shapefile dataset to
create labeled, temporal-sampled and linearly interpolated time series at the pixel
level. The code assets created in that study where made available for others to reuse
and can be found in https://github.com/agustingp/remoteSensingTimeSeries.
4</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Methodology</title>
      <p>During this study, we designed two experiments to assess the performance of CNNs
for classifying land-use practices that can inform decision making to achieve a more
sustainable agriculture. Below, we explain the aim of each experiment and describe
the process for creating the labeled time-series dataset.
4.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>Experiment 1</title>
        <p>
          The first experiment was designed aiming at classifying two agricultural practices:
single cropping and double cropping, within the same year. Double cropping practice
is an important sustainable practice that aims at reducing the fallow periods of the
land, exploiting solar energy to enhance the quality of the soil and preventing soil
erosion [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
          ]. When introducing the so-called “Cover Crops” into annual crop
rotations, double cropping has been shown to improve the provision of multiple
ecosystem services in time, such as biomass production, N supply, soil C storage, NO3
retention, erosion control, weed suppression, and beneficial insect conservation [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>For the experiment, we first filtered the ground truth data removing classes that
were not representing agricultural fields. Then we identified the fields where double
cropping practice and single cropping practice took place during the year. Table 2
presents the total amount of polygons and the total amount of pixels sampled. For
each pixel, a labeled time series was created using the three spectral bands from the
satellite images. This process is explained in Section 3.4. In this case, as the
doublecropping class was under-represented, we selected the total amount of double
cropping pixels as the limit to be sampled from the single cropping polygons. The
sampling was done randomly, maximizing the diversity of single cropping polygons and
not exceeding the limit of 29596 pixels. In the end, the total number of pixels sampled
was 29596 for both classes.</p>
        <p>Class name
Double cropping
Single cropping</p>
        <p>Total</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>Experiment 2</title>
        <p>
          The second experiment consists of the classification of 20 different agricultural land
use classes. During this practical experience, we focused on the classification of
different crops that were grown in a “Single Cropping” approach. The rotation of crops
across different years often leads to better yields due to soil fertility improvements
[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
          ], while also reducing the external dependency on agrochemicals [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19 ref20">19, 20</xref>
          ]. As we
described in Section 1, crop rotations should follow a set of rules and criteria in order
to be efficient. In this way, we aim to develop a model that classifies a comprehensive
list of crops harnessing their temporal growing patterns.
        </p>
        <p>For the experiment, we first filtered the ground truth data removing all the classes
that did not represent an agricultural field. Following this, we removed the
doublecropping practice ones, to focus on the fields where only one crop was grown during
the year. From a list of 47 different crops (also including agricultural classes such as
“fallow”), we selected the 20 classes that were best represented in terms of the
number of pixels available. However, class imbalances are present in our dataset with the
highest number of pixels for “Mixed Pasture” class, and the lowest number of pixels
for “Grain Sorghum” class. Table 3 presents the total amount of polygons and the
total amount of pixels sampled. Finally, we followed the same criteria for time series
creation as for Experiment 1.</p>
        <p>Class name
Eucalyptus
Walnuts</p>
        <p>Pears
Almonds
Cherries
Safflower</p>
        <p>Corn
Grain sorghum</p>
        <p>Sudan
Beans
Hay
Rest
Alfalfa</p>
        <p>Clover
Mixed Pasture</p>
        <p>
          Melons
Potatoes
Tomatoes
Flowers
In this study, we employed the CNN architecture proposed by Pelletier et al. [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
          ] and
implemented using Keras framework. Fig. 2 depicts a general view of the
architecture. For simplicity, we excluded from the diagram the Batch Normalization,
Activation, and Dropout layers. This sequence is followed after each 1 Dimension
Convolution and after the Dense layer, as well. Table 4 presents a list of parameters and
values used for the network configuration.
        </p>
        <p>221
4154
2758
360285
The models for both experiments were trained using the Azure cloud infrastructure
provided by Microsoft AI for Earth grant program. The virtual machine uses an
NVIDIA Tesla K80 GPU card. Each dataset created for Experiment 1 and Experiment
2, respectively, was split in two, 80% for the training set and 20% for the testing set.
The training set was also split in runtime to separate some data for validation. We
used a validation rate of 0.05, which means that 5% of the training set was used to
validate the model performance during training. During each partitioning step, the</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>division of data was done at the polygon level, meaning that no pixels from the same
polygon are in the training, testing or validation set at the same time.</p>
      <p>In this section, we present the results of the data preprocessing pipeline as well as the
trained models' performance.
5.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-5-1">
        <title>Time-series profiles</title>
        <p>After the preprocessing process described in Section 3.4, we obtained 419,477 pixels’
time-series. A sample of this time-series was plotted for both experiments. Fig. 3
presents the temporal and multispectral timeseries data for two different pixels, the
left-hand side one corresponds to the “Single cropping” class, whereas the right-hand
side corresponds to the “Double cropping” class. Fig. 4 presents this information for
other two pixels classes, “Corn” and “Alfalfa”, respectively.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-2">
        <title>Models Evaluation</title>
        <p>The overall classification accuracy for Experiment 1 was 88% and Experiment 2 was
89%. To achieve an extra performance verification of the model developed in
Experiment 1, we used it to classify the entire dataset from Experiment 2. As we explained
before, Experiment 2 dataset contains only pixels that belongs to single cropping
practice. The results of the classification show 97% for this dataset. The highly
accurate results can be explained because the model in Experiment 1 was trained with a
sampling of pixels that maximized the diversity of polygons represented in the
dataset. Then, most of the polygons in Experiment 2 where sampled in the dataset of
Experiment 1. These results show that even the use of a small number of pixels
coming from the same polygon are representative enough for the network to learn the
specific time-patterns of the polygon.</p>
        <p>
          In Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 we present the recall, precision and F-score for each experiment
classes.
The paucity of up-to-date ground truth data presents a problem for utilizing newer
satellite imagery with a higher spatial, spectral and temporal resolution for training
supervised AI models, as it is the European Sentinel constellation. On the other hand,
initiatives like the Harmonized Landsat and Sentinel-2 [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>
          ] by NASA aiming at
creating a virtual constellation of surface reflectance data coming from different satellites,
should be strongly supported. Currently, this product is not available worldwide,
creating another mismatch with ground truth data. Comparing our experiments with
other related studies, ours have made use of publicly available satellite imagery, making
a transfer learning approach that would make the process of fitting the models for
other geographical locations, viable. We have also utilized convolution layers to learn
temporal patterns from land-use dynamics. While some studies have only focused on
the classification of a few agricultural types, we have trained a single model that is
able to classify 20 agricultural classes with 89% accuracy. None of the studies
analyzed before had classified pure temporal characteristics, as we did in Experiment 1.
The confusion matrix for Experiment 2 shows that the network is making mistakes in
classifying classes with similar characteristics. For instance, Grain Sorghum is being
confused with Corn most of the times. The physiological and developmental similar
characteristics between this two crops have been well documented [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>
          ] and can
explain the network confusion between these two classes. In the case of Mixed Pastures,
greatest confusion occurs with Alfalfa class, and vice versa (confusion of Alfalfa with
Mixed Pastures). Alfalfa is a type of pasture, and the confusion can be explained
because of a high concentration of Alfalfa in these pixels, or the presence of other types
of pastures in Alfalfa fields, respectively. Future work includes finetuning the model
parameters to improve precision and recall, extending the number of classes to learn,
and create a more general architecture that is able to handle multiple years of data.
Further work will also involve evaluation of the transferability of the models learned
on the Sacramento data to different geographic locations.
7
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>In this paper, we presented a novel approach to processing satellite imagery
validated in a set of two distinct experiments using Convolutional Neural Networks with
convolutions in the temporal dimension. Most of the recent AI models or classifiers
used in operational mapping use single date spectral data for classification and do not
harness the temporal resolution of remotely sensed time-series images. Therefore, we
argue that our solution provides an important contribution to the domain. Our
evaluation showed promising results with our models achieving 88% and 89% accuracy for
experiments 1 and 2 respectively. Our future work will focus on improving these
results, covering more classes and with a more general architecture.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sahajpal</surname>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
            <given-names>X</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Izaurralde</surname>
            <given-names>RC</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , et al (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
          <article-title>Identifying representative crop rotation patterns and grassland loss in the US Western Corn Belt</article-title>
          .
          <source>Comput Electron Agric</source>
          <volume>108</volume>
          :
          <fpage>173</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>182</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.
          <year>2014</year>
          .
          <volume>08</volume>
          .005
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>TWN</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
          <article-title>Agroecology: Key Concepts</article-title>
          and Practices
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Doré</surname>
            <given-names>T</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Makowski</surname>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Malézieux</surname>
            <given-names>E</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , et al (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
          <article-title>Facing up to the paradigm of ecological intensification in agronomy: Revisiting methods, concepts and knowledge</article-title>
          .
          <source>Eur J Agron</source>
          <volume>34</volume>
          :
          <fpage>197</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>210</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.
          <year>2011</year>
          .
          <volume>02</volume>
          .006
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schipanski</surname>
            <given-names>ME</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Barbercheck</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Douglas</surname>
            <given-names>MR</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , et al (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
          <article-title>A framework for evaluating ecosystem services provided by cover crops in agroecosystems</article-title>
          .
          <source>Agric Syst</source>
          <volume>125</volume>
          :
          <fpage>12</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>22</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.
          <year>2013</year>
          .
          <volume>11</volume>
          .004
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>De Baerdemaeker</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
          <article-title>Precision agriculture technology and robotics for good agricultural practices</article-title>
          .
          <source>IFAC</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bégué</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Arvor</surname>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lelong</surname>
            <given-names>C</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , et al (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
          <article-title>Agricultural Systems Studies using Remote Sensing</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cresson</surname>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
          <article-title>A Framework for Remote Sensing Images Processing Using Deep Learning Techniques</article-title>
          . IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.
          <year>2018</year>
          .2867949
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhu</surname>
            <given-names>XX</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tuia</surname>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mou</surname>
            <given-names>L</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , et al (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
          <article-title>Deep Learning in Remote Sensing: A Comprehensive Review and List of Resources</article-title>
          .
          <source>IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Mag</source>
          <volume>5</volume>
          :
          <fpage>8</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>36</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.
          <year>2017</year>
          .2762307
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gómez</surname>
            <given-names>C</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>White</surname>
            <given-names>JC</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wulder</surname>
            <given-names>MA</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
          <article-title>Optical remotely sensed time series data for land cover classification: A review</article-title>
          .
          <source>ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens</source>
          <volume>116</volume>
          :
          <fpage>55</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>72</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <volume>03</volume>
          .008
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhong</surname>
            <given-names>L</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hu</surname>
            <given-names>L</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhou</surname>
            <given-names>H</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
          <article-title>Deep learning based multi-temporal crop classification</article-title>
          .
          <source>Remote Sens Environ</source>
          <volume>221</volume>
          :
          <fpage>430</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>443</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.
          <year>2018</year>
          .
          <volume>11</volume>
          .032
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pelletier</surname>
            <given-names>C</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Webb</surname>
            <given-names>GI</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Petitjean</surname>
            <given-names>F</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
          <article-title>Temporal Convolutional Neural Network for the Classification of Satellite Image Time Series</article-title>
          . https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11050523
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cai</surname>
            <given-names>Y</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guan</surname>
            <given-names>K</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Peng</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , et al (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
          <article-title>A high-performance and in-season classification system of field-level crop types using time-series Landsat data and a machine learning approach</article-title>
          .
          <source>Remote Sens Environ</source>
          <volume>210</volume>
          :
          <fpage>35</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>47</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.
          <year>2018</year>
          .
          <volume>02</volume>
          .045
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Coppock R</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Agriculture in the Sacramento Region Trends</article-title>
          and Prospects
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>FAO</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
          <article-title>Handbook on remote sensing for agricultural statistics</article-title>
          . https://doi.org/10.13140
          <source>/RG.2.2.13259.69920</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15. Landsat Science Products. https://www.usgs.gov/land-resources/nli/landsat/landsatscience-products.
          <source>Accessed 14 Jun 2019</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Flood</surname>
            <given-names>N</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
          <article-title>Continuity of reflectance data between landsat-7 ETM+ and landsat-8 OLI, for both top-of-atmosphere and surface reflectance: A study in the australian landscape</article-title>
          .
          <source>Remote Sens</source>
          <volume>6</volume>
          :
          <fpage>7952</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>7970</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6097952
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          17.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pinto</surname>
            <given-names>P</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fernández Long</surname>
            <given-names>ME</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Piñeiro</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
          <article-title>Including cover crops during fallow periods for increasing ecosystem services: Is it possible in croplands of Southern South America?</article-title>
          <source>Agric Ecosyst Environ</source>
          <volume>248</volume>
          :
          <fpage>48</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>57</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <volume>07</volume>
          .028
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          18.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ellis</surname>
            <given-names>BG</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hargrove</surname>
            <given-names>WL</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pierce</surname>
            <given-names>FJ</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rice</surname>
            <given-names>CW</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
          <article-title>Crop Rotation and Its Impact on Efficiency of Water and Nitrogen Use</article-title>
          . https://doi.org/10.2134/asaspecpub51.c3
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          19.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sarandón</surname>
            <given-names>SJ</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Claudia Cecilia Flores (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
          <article-title>Agroecología: bases teóricas para el diseño y manejo de Agroecosistemas sustentables</article-title>
          . Universidad
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nacional de La Plata - Editorial de la Universidad</surname>
          </string-name>
          de La Plata
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          20.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dias</surname>
            <given-names>T</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dukes</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Antunes</surname>
            <given-names>PM</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
          <article-title>Accounting for soil biotic effects on soil health and crop productivity in the design of crop rotations</article-title>
          .
          <source>J Sci Food Agric</source>
          <volume>95</volume>
          :
          <fpage>447</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>454</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6565
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          21.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Claverie</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ju</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Masek</surname>
            <given-names>JG</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , et al (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
          <article-title>The Harmonized Landsat and Sentinel-2 surface reflectance data set</article-title>
          .
          <source>Remote Sens Environ</source>
          <volume>219</volume>
          :
          <fpage>145</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>161</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.
          <year>2018</year>
          .
          <volume>09</volume>
          .002
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          22.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Assefa</surname>
            <given-names>Y</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Roozeboom</surname>
            <given-names>K</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Thompson</surname>
            <given-names>C</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , et al (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
          <article-title>Corn and Grain Sorghum Comparison: All Things Considered</article-title>
          .
          <source>Corn Grain Sorghum Comp All Things Consid 1-116</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>