=Paper= {{Paper |id=Vol-2563/aics_36 |storemode=property |title=The Digital Transformation of Irish Non-Profit Organisations |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2563/aics_36.pdf |volume=Vol-2563 |authors=John O'Grady,Paula Roberts |dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/aics/OGradyR19 }} ==The Digital Transformation of Irish Non-Profit Organisations== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2563/aics_36.pdf
            The Digital Transformation of Irish Non-Profit
                            Organisations

                                 John O’Grady and Paula Roberts1
            1 Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. ojohn@tcd.ie; robertsp@scss.tcd.ie




         Abstract. Irish Non-Profit Organisations have embarked on an exciting Digital Transfor-
         mation journey in support of the sector’s wider reform and renewal agenda. This coincides
         with the ambitious plans of the technology industry to deploy its Artificial Intelligence capa-
         bilities to tackle societal problems. This research investigated the current in-use experiences
         of AI-based and related systems in various non-profit organisations both in Ireland and inter-
         nationally to determine how a non-profit organisation can become more effective and strate-
         gic in its journey to fully leverage technology. The qualitative research approach employed a
         series of exploratory practitioner-based interviews guided by Grounded Theory methodology
         to examine the technology barriers and challenges faced by the non-profit sector. The findings
         revealed some inspirational exemplars of practice but also found that a comprehensive trans-
         formation of the sector facilitated by emerging technologies remains outstanding, frustrated
         by challenges including limited funding, resource constraints, skills gaps, donor reporting
         requirements and sectoral tendencies to ‘reinvent the wheel’. The practitioner interviews also
         highlighted discontinuities and a lack of synergy between the digital transformation ambitions
         of the sector and the Corporate Social Responsibility programmes of the technology sector.


     Keywords: Non-Profit Organisations, Digital Transformation, Artificial Intelligence


1        Introduction

1.1      Context to Research

Irish non-profit organisations (NPOs) have commenced an ambitious reform and moderni-
sation journey as the sector seeks to recover from recent scandals. The sector is working to
transform its operations and service delivery to drive efficiency and to leverage the possi-
bilities afforded by digital channels and other emerging technologies such as Artificial In-
telligence (AI). This technology-led imperative, which has been described by Peppard [1]
as Digital Transformation, sees organisations developing digital capabilities to transform
both their internal operational processes and to revolutionise the channels through which
they engage with their customers and stakeholders. This is a journey filled with creative
possibilities for the NPO sector but one which remains frustratingly incomplete, notwith-
standing some inspiring exemplars and pockets of excellent practice which are noted later.




    Copyright © 2019 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License
    Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
1.2     Challenges and Barriers to Digital Transformation for Non-Profits.

Three primary factors inhibit Irish NPOs in executing on the digital transformation agenda:


1.2.1      Short Term and Restrictive Funding Models

Research by The Wheel [2] shows that the NPO sector represents just under 6% of Irish
GDP with a reported income of €16bn. The majority of its funding comes via annual gov-
ernment grants which the NPO organisations are contractually bound to apply directly to
social purposes or service delivery. This funding model constrains the sector in undertaking
the longer-term capital investment required to modernise its technology infrastructure.


1.2.2      Public Perceptions: Low Trust, Expectation to see donations spent at front-line
The Charities Institute of Ireland [3] found that trust in Irish charities remains exceptionally
low, presenting challenges as the sector seeks to recover from damaging governance scan-
dals at Rehab, Console and the Central Remedial Clinic. At the same time, the public also
want charities to be more transparent, to maximise the proportion of donated funds spent
on service delivery and to minimise administrative costs, including technology expenditure.


1.2.3      NPO Management: Cautious Incrementalism rather than Transformation

The budgetary and low trust contexts noted serve to exponentially increase project risk and
to amplify the potential reputational consequences of a major failed project initiative. These
are factors which have coalesced to necessarily foster a relatively cautious and risk-averse
management stance to strategic technology investment within the Irish NPO sector to date.


1.3     Research Question

Based on the above, the primary research question examined was as follows: How can non-
profit organisations leverage the transformational opportunities afforded by digital
and emerging technologies, including Artificial Intelligence, for social good?


2       Background

Analysis into related works highlighted this area of investigation as a critical but hitherto
under-examined topic in the research literature, especially in an Irish context. The areas of
previous work noted below provided a theoretical grounding informing the qualitative in-
vestigation undertaken.


2.1     Research into the Non-Profit Sector’s technology journey to date
In Burt and Taylor’s case study [4] within U.K. NPOs, they showed that centralised imper-
atives to implement technology programmes can founder when they come into conflict with
the decentralised and volunteer-led nature of local operations. Carnochan et al. [5] note that
a lack of internal expertise can inhibit NPOs in leveraging the full capabilities of digital
technology, observing that the specific internal competencies to support successful innova-
tion are not the same ones which are conducive to technological deployment. Jaskyte [6]
highlights the need for leadership support for technology within NPOs, noting that newly
appointed CEOs may be more open to transformational change than long-established ones.


2.2    Theoretical Approaches to Technology Adoption

Volkoff and Strong [7] examined the social process of NPO technology development and
deployment through a critical realist lens to derive a practical framework, envisioning ICT
as a dynamic process linking technology uptake to affordance actualisation. A related and
substantial body of work concerning ICT4D (Information and Communications Technol-
ogy for Development) pertains to international charities operating in the developing world.
ICT4D has sought to combine implementation insights from the Information Systems do-
main with Development theories concerning transformational impacts emanating from the
Social Sciences. However, some commentators (Marcus and Silver [8]) have described the
attempt by ICT4D to fuse and cross-pollinate disciplines as only partially successful to date.


2.3    Strategic Alignment of Technology Plans to Overall Strategic Plan

The degree of strategic alignment between functional ICT teams and the leadership team
within NPOs often serves as a major enabler (and predictor) of successful digital transfor-
mation. Collins [9] sets out three alternative pathways for NPOs to achieve digital transfor-
mation which depend on the chosen internal operating model (see Figure 1 below).




         Figure 1 Pathways to Digital Transformation (adapted from [Collins [12])

The preceding framework closely echoes the mainstream digital pathways developed in the
strategic management literature by Weill and Woerner [10] examining the process of digital
transformation within commercial organisations. They term ‘Future Ready’ companies as
being fully ambidextrous: focussed on improving their customers’ experience relative to
competitors while iteratively simplifying operations, reducing cost, and driving efficiency.


3       Exemplars of NPOs in the use of AI and related tools

A detailed survey of the literature was undertaken, and a representative sample of individual
relevant organisations was chosen to identify existing exemplars of practice which can in-
form the wider sector’s transformation journey. Notwithstanding an acute awareness of the
growing potential of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and data science
to support NPOs in working to address societal issues, it rapidly became clear that com-
pleted deployments of emerging technologies which had been fully mainstreamed into the
core operations of the NPOs were relatively rare. The reasons for the limited adoption of
AI and other emerging technologies and some solutions to address this are explored further
in the sections that follow. However, before examining the research data in detail, some
promising sectoral ‘green shoots’ from the wider NPO sector are briefly noted here:

    •    Friends of the Earth launched the highly successful Great British Bee Count pro-
         gramme [11], which enables local activists to use mobile apps to gather infor-
         mation on local bee populations. They have also explored the use of machine
         learning to aid classification of the bees photographed using the mobile app.
    •    Oxfam, one of the largest global charities, is developing DataHub, a project to
         manage central repositories of local programme data and support local teams to
         use data science tools to analyse that data. A particularly beneficial aspect is that
         the management of critical data privacy risks is embedded centrally within the
         core data management process. As a result, Oxfam has now begun working with
         Microsoft to develop an open source version which will serve as a data privacy
         tool to support data analysis for use across the wider NPO sector.
    •    Technology companies such as Microsoft and Google are partnering with the
         World Bank, U.N. and global relief organizations to use AI to predict future dis-
         asters which will require humanitarian aid and to streamline the planning and lo-
         gistics processes which underpin the rapid delivery of emergency aid.
    •    NetHope, a technology focussed partnership between global NPOs and the tech-
         nology industry, has launched the No Lost Generation [12] programme which
         provides access to digital e-learning tools localised for use by Syrian refugees.
    •    Irish Wheelchair Association, Ireland’s largest provider of Assisted Living Ser-
         vices to people with disabilities is developing VERA (Virtual Employee Relations
         Assistant), an employee-focussed chatbot agent to provide support, guidance and
         a point of 24-7 contact for its front-line care workers who work in the community.
         • A poverty organisation interviewed for this research is currently considering the
         development of a predictive machine learning tool to examine patterns in the use
         of homelessness services to identify those individuals who may be at particular
         risk of homelessness and to plan for appropriate early support interventions.
4       Methodology

The primary research methodology used a qualitative interview approach to develop a prac-
titioner-centric view of the current status, challenges and opportunities faced by the Irish
NPO sector on its journey to leverage the power of digital technology, a research area which
has not been extensively explored or documented to date. As the topic was not well docu-
mented to date, a qualitative approach informed by Grounded Theory (Glaser and Strauss
[13]) was selected as the primary research design as it facilitated an exploratory approach.


4.1     Sample Selection

Using the Irish Charity Regulator’s Public Register of Charities [14], an initial sample of 7
Irish NPOs (interviews 1-7 in Table 1 below) with a collective turnover of €650m was
generated using a purposeful sampling approach to ensure a mix of different organisation
types including overseas development charities, those combatting poverty in Ireland and
those supporting people with disabilities or other specific health conditions. Subsequently,
directly informed by the exploratory Grounded Theory approach, the research lens for the
final three interviews (interviews 8-10 below) broadened to include interviews with non-
technology stakeholders, a senior technology executive at a large global international or-
ganisation and to include two U.K. based conservation organisations, a sector which was
not previously represented in the data. This broader focus greatly increased the richness
and diversity of the qualitative data gathered. However, it must be noted that there is a
challenge in comparing the available resources and technology approaches of organisations
which operate at such different scales and it would be inappropriate to conflate the contexts.


4.2     Data Analysis.

With the consent of participants, the interviews were recorded, transcribed, coded and an-
alysed using Dedoose, a Computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS)
tool. Reflective memos were created by the primary researcher after each interview to rec-
ord and explore the emerging insights from the data. A recursive approach was used so that
the data emerging in early interviews highlighted new research themes which in turn in-
formed the nature of the topics explored and the selection of participants in later interviews.

Table 1 Overview of the 10 Interview Participants and their organisations
    Interview #   Interviewee Role                 Charity Area            HQ Location   Annual Budget
    1             Head of ICT                      Poverty/ Homelessness   Ireland       €75- €100m
    2             IT Manager                       Disability              Ireland       €0- €25m
    3             Project Manager                  Overseas Development    Ireland       €150- €200m
    4             Director of Corp. Services       Overseas Development    Ireland       €75- €100m
    5             Director of Corp. Services       Poverty/ Homelessness   Ireland       €25- €50m
    6             Head of ICT                      Overseas Development    Ireland       €100- €150m
    7             Head of ICT                      Disability              Ireland       €50- €75m
    8             CIO                              Overseas Development    Global NGO    > €1bn
    9             Director of Digital Disruption   Environmental           UK            €0- €25m
    10            Head of ICT                      Environmental           UK            €0- €25m
5      Research Findings

The interviews conducted for this research revealed a clear consensus that emerging tech-
nologies including AI can and must radically transform how non-profit organisations de-
liver services, manage operations and engage with stakeholders in order for the organisa-
tions to remain relevant in the modern economy. Interviewees saw a strategic imperative
for the sector to modernise, with developing their technology capability linked as a pivotal
support pillar to the wider sectoral reform agenda. As the research interviews progressed,
various operational challenges and resource constraints in executing digital transformation
as well as a variety of fascinating solutions came to light.


5.1    ICT Strategy Status

Considering the range of NPO organisations investigated for this research, it became clear
that they were at very different stages in planning their technology journey. Some had well-
developed technology plans linked to the overall strategy, while at others, the development
of an ICT strategy has commenced but remained incomplete. This state of being “between
strategies” was noted at several organisations and the resulting lacuna incubated a cau-
tiously incremental technology strategy which served as a holding position while waiting
for a leadership mandate for more radical technology transformation to emerge. Interview
participants noted that resource constraints and operational challenges meant the sector
would have to follow and belatedly emulate the private sector’s technology journey, espe-
cially in relation to automation and AI. Conversely, it was noted that the timing of this
journey could also potentially enable them to “leap-frog” larger enterprises as they would
not need to migrate legacy applications.

Each participant was asked to benchmark their own organisation against the wider sector,
which yielded fascinating results. Those organisations which had a cautious technology
strategy were quick to accentuate their modest achievements while the most innovative
organisations were also those more likely to understate their own technology journey, high-
lighting gaps, resource constraints and outstanding areas of work. This indicated that those
organisations which had the most advanced understanding of the transformative potential
of emerging technologies were also those who were the most likely to conceptualise their
long-term technology journey as evolutionary, open-ended and a work-in-progress.


5.2    Leadership and Strategic Alignment Perspectives

Interviewees also noted that the organisation’s historical experience with technology in-
vestments directly impacted on the willingness of the Board or Leadership team to commit
substantial resources to technology investments. Failed previous projects cast a long
shadow over the organisation’s future technology ambitions while successful exemplars
created a mandate for more transformative and ambitious undertakings. Where an organi-
sational impetus for further automation emerged, this frequently coincided with a change
within the senior management team. This worked most effectively where energetic vision-
ary leadership was matched by an innovative and creative technology team which focussed
on strategically supporting the wider business and growth objectives of the organisation.
Cross-referencing the interview data with the strategic plan documents for the ten organi-
sations was revealing. In the published strategic plans, two organisations made no reference
to technology; four included a one-line technology reference without specifics; two more
noted some specific initiatives while the final two included a comprehensive list of their
technology project priorities within their strategic plan.


5.3    Executive Representation for the ICT function

Many interviewees saw the head of the technology function being represented on the lead-
ership committee for their organisation as increasingly critical to ensuring the alignment of
their technology capabilities with the broader execution of the organisation’s strategy.
However, to date, it had only happened at the four largest organisations examined in the
research. There, it was noted that the elevation to the leadership team afforded the technol-
ogy executive extended opportunities to engage in ongoing dialogue with executive peers
concerning the capacity of technology to add value to strategic initiatives. In this regard,
the most enterprising and progressive technology leaders across the organisations empha-
sised that one of their most valuable contributions to their organisation was to act as what
one interviewee termed ‘horizon gazers’, an activity which was perceived as a strategic
remit to maintain a constant weather eye on the ever-changing technology landscape to
identify technology opportunities which the organisation could exploit and to align these to
the organisation’s overall strategic implementation. This vital function of ICT teams is par-
ticularly apposite in relation to emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence, ma-
chine learning and data analytics.


5.4    Funding Issues

Inevitably, a significant challenge concerned the lack of funds required to invest in tech-
nology. As noted above, the sector relies on government grants which are rarely structured
to encourage or support long term transformational strategic projects. A related barrier
noted was a constant requirement to demonstrate the prudent use of donated funds and grant
income which can make it difficult to finance major technology initiatives, especially for
strategic projects which necessitated costly external consulting. As one interviewee noted:

  “Our sector is driven so heavily by the demands of our donors. When you buy an iPhone
  or a Ford car you don't tell Ford that you want to know exactly how much they funded
  in overheads in making that car. Our sector has the unique challenge to actually do that.”


5.5    Data Issues
The need to comply with funder requirements could also directly block or inadvertently
inhibit the organisation’s desire to upgrade its technology processes. Several organisations
provided examples of funder compliance requirements to simultaneously update two infor-
mation systems- the internal and the funder-mandated systems- with the same data. Another
case concerned an Irish international aid organisation which had successfully piloted a fully
digital beneficiary payments system using blockchain. The success of the pilot had clearly
demonstrated the feasibility of the digital solution and the project benefits in terms of au-
ditability, fraud reduction and security over the current paper process. However, the initia-
tive had stalled because of the funder’s requirements for the organisation to continue to
provide paper-based evidence of payments via beneficiary fingerprints.


5.6    Data Analytics

Participants noted the benefits of collecting improved data in assessing the effectiveness of
each programme area, helping to drive decision making and resource allocation. Partici-
pants at two different Irish NPOs had built an activity tracking system on their CRM plat-
form. Prior to this, neither organisation had a comprehensive means to measure the overall
impact of their local programmes. When they began formally and consistently gathering
this data, they discovered that the real quantum of their activity was considerably higher
than previously estimated. Referencing trust and reputational issues, interview participants
highlighted data capabilities as enabling the construction of a clear narrative to show the
beneficial impact of their activities, noting particularly that developing a compelling graph-
ical visualisation of their impact can be extremely valuable in bringing activity data to life.


5.7    Partnerships and Capacity Building with the Technology Sector’s Corporate
       and Social Responsibility (CSR) Programmes.

There was palpable excitement among the interviewees about the opportunities presented
by the technology sector’s donations of technology to non-profits. The software donation
programmes meant that the licensing cost of new technology had largely been removed as
a financial barrier. However, the internal teams often still faced challenges in getting fund-
ing for the additional consulting and professional services to support the implementation of
the donated technology platforms. Limited budgets and small teams necessitated team
members acting as technology generalists with a paucity of specialist technology roles.
Each of the large technology companies have significant Corporate Social Responsibility
(CSR) and philanthropy programmes to support the NPO sector, primarily via software
donations. The Irish charities examined were all availing of the non-profit Microsoft Non-
Profit Cloud programme which makes Office 365, SharePoint and other related tools avail-
able to charities free or at a substantial discount, with partnerships with Google and
Salesforce also noted as significant support relationships, particularly among the larger
global organisations. Consistent with the literature, several organisations had sought to
build partnerships with the technology companies to explore technologies such as AI and
data science, viewing this as an exciting opportunity to fuse the sectoral knowledge of
NPOs with the proprietary product knowledge of the technology sector but the NPOs noted
disappointment that the initiatives had largely failed to deliver on the expected potential.


5.8    Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing Opportunities

A striking finding was that there was limited dialogue or collaboration around technology
between the Irish non-profit organisations even though many of them were using identical
technology platforms. Allied to this, the need for sectoral research on the reasons for the
prevalence of failed and compromised technology projects emerged as a critical require-
ment so that the underlying causes can be identified and addressed. This was noted as a
tricky and sensitive area for the sector where greater transparency and openness are needed.


5.9    Implementation and Project Delivery Challenges

Participants noted that the sector had longer lead times for technology project delivery than
the private sector. As well as funding challenges, this was because of the slower consensus-
based nature of decision making in NPOs as well as a lack of specialist business analysis
skills within some of the organisations. Setting clear, realistic and achievable project ob-
jectives for the available technology resources to deliver on was viewed as vital to success.
Bearing in mind the difficulty of ICT teams delivering new technology projects while also
having a requirement to support the delivery of ICT operations and manage legacy technol-
ogy, interviewees noted the benefit of disaggregating the technology function into discrete
functional sub-units which focussed on ICT operations and on project delivery respectively.


5.10   Unique Approaches to Innovation and Prototyping

Irish NPOs have long been innovative and agile in designing adaptive responses to societal
issues. A unique characteristic is the prevalence of volunteers, often retired from the work-
force, who may have less familiarity with technology. This requires a more inclusive, par-
ticipative and nuanced approach to implementing technology. Multiple interview partici-
pants stressed the importance of early meaningful engagement with relevant stakeholders
to establish a clear and shared sense of purpose about the expected deliverables for the
project. The existence of a supportive business champion outside the technology function
was frequently cited as a critical enabler of project success. This was especially valuable
where the project sponsor had the local knowledge and organisational standing to clearly
articulate and “sell” project benefits in terms that were comprehensible and meaningful to
local teams while also having the vision to maintain an unrelenting focus on driving the
overall delivery of the project objectives.

A common phenomenon observed was that the deployment of a technology-based solution
across the organisation often inspired a broader initiative to standardise processes which
had previously been ad-hoc and subject to local variation. All interview participants rec-
ognised the necessity of piloting new solutions which afforded project teams the capability
to demonstrate an early prototype, to test the fit and scalability of the proposed solution and
to assess the performance in some of the challenging field-based scenarios encountered, an
informal and iterative approach which echoes Agile approaches to technology delivery.


5.11   Planning and Governance Issues
However, some of the larger organisations noted that an unstructured technology approach
to project initiation and portfolio management could be a recipe for mounting chaos, in-
creasing the overall levels of project and governance risk if unchecked. As their IT delivery
capabilities progressively matured and became better resourced, they found it necessary to
formalise IT planning processes to maximise business alignment and reduce project risk.
Several organisations had implemented highly effective ICT Governance or Change Boards
where representatives of the operations and technology leadership teams came together to
prioritise projects and align technology plans to the overall organisational strategy, partic-
ularly where technology requirements to support operations exceeded available resources.


5.12   Mainstreaming Innovation and Digital Disruption

An interesting and unforeseen finding emerging from the interviews related to the fact that
the most innovative (and disruptive) technology initiatives within NPOs often took place
well away from core operations. This created challenges in mainstreaming even relatively
straightforward pilot projects. The reasons for this somewhat siloed approach to technology
innovation differed across the sector. A primary explanation was the understandable need
to avoid negative or disruptive impact on key operational activities as well as to take ad-
vantage of partnerships and funding opportunities so as to foster and publicly demonstrate
a culture of innovation. However, even where the pilot projects were overwhelmingly suc-
cessful, a clear plan to leverage and operationalise this new capability on a wider opera-
tional scale was often missing and the post-pilot mainstreaming approach had often not
been explicitly addressed or prepared for during the planning of the pilots.


6      Research Learnings and Limitations

6.1    Research Limitations

A limitation of the research findings is that they represent the individual views of the par-
ticipants who were interviewed, rather than the considered position of the organisations for
whom the individual participants work, or a comprehensive picture of the entire NPO sec-
tor. While the research yielded valuable original data, and demonstrated the effectiveness
of Grounded Theory as an effective exploratory research approach, further validity and
rigour could have been added to the research by extending the approach to combine quali-
tative interview data with an additional quantitative survey covering all of the non-profit
organisations in the sector. A wider survey could possibly have served as a confirmation
exercise once dimensions of the research topic had been initially scoped through interviews.


6.2    Reflection on the Research Contribution

Notwithstanding the limitations noted in section 6.1 above, many of the findings (for ex-
ample, concerning leadership issues, strategic alignment as well as funding and data issues)
proved remarkably consistent with the international research examined in the literature re-
view. However, the research also revealed some new insights concerning discontinuities
between the technology sector’s CSR initiatives and the needs of the NPO sector as well as
challenges in mainstreaming successful innovation projects into the NPO’s core operations
which had not been examined in detail within the literature to date. This underscores the
considerable and original value of the interview data gathered, the full richness of which
can only be hinted at in this short paper. It represents a sincere and accurate articulation of
practitioner experiences within NPOs concerning their recent technology implementations,
albeit firmly situated at a single point in time and primarily within the specific context of
the Irish non-profit sector. A welcome and positive direct outcome of the research has been
the establishment of new knowledge sharing structures where technology leaders within
the Irish NPOs meet to collaborate and share insights from their technology journeys.


6.3    Further Work

It would be very worthwhile to delve deeper into the unexpected disconnect identified be-
tween the technology sector’s CSR programmes and the NPO’s technology and moderni-
sation agenda. A full understanding of the underlying causes of this discontinuity remained
quite fragmentary at the conclusion of this research. Additionally, a more comprehensive
analysis of best practice exemplars from larger international NPOs would be likely to pro-
vide a range of implementation insights and repeatable modalities of practice which smaller
Irish NPOs could emulate in their digital journey with AI and other emerging technologies.


7      Conclusions

7.1    Need for IT Governance Processes to align with Strategy

Critically, an unambiguous correlation emerged from the interview data between the
amount of progress that an organisation had made to date in its journey towards digital
transformation and the extent to which it had implemented effective processes to align the
work of the technology function with the overall strategy agenda of the organisation.


7.2    Need for ICT to be supported/represented at the Leadership/Executive level

It was notable, too, that there was a disparity between the technology maturity and ambi-
tions of smaller and larger organisations. International and larger Irish NPOs were much
more likely to appoint a CIO role to lead the technology function, granting this role mem-
bership of the executive leadership team. Where this had happened, it was correlated di-
rectly with the level of strategic technology awareness and ambition, and with the progress
made to date on the implementation journey at those organisations. This finding is entirely
consistent with previous research in the literature (in particular Jaskyte [6]) which high-
lights the importance of executive support for the digital agenda.


7.3    Sectoral Capacity Building/ Development of new Partnership Models with the
       Technology Sector

Capacity building as an urgent prerogative within the sector surfaced frequently in the in-
terviews. There are plentiful models from the international NPO sector such as the NetHope
skills framework [15] for digital transformation which can readily be emulated in a local
Irish context. Ireland’s non-profit sector should proactively engage with the technology
corporates to develop new partnerships to explore mutually beneficial innovation opportu-
nities. No other sector can replicate the intimate first-hand knowledge of Ireland’s societal
problems and the deep understanding of the needs of stakeholders which the non-profit
sector already possesses. Rather than seeking to reinvent the technology wheel, the sector
should articulate its challenges and requirements as problem statements and work with the
technology sector to develop partnership approaches and co-create appropriate solutions.



References
 1. Peppard, J.: Future Ready Organisations. Irish Computer Society Practitioner Briefing. Dublin,
    Ireland. 25th Jan 2019.
 2. The Wheel: A Portrait of Ireland’s Non-Profit Sector, https://www.wheel.ie/sites/de-
    fault/files/media/file-uploads/2018-07/Portrait%20of%20the%20Non-Profit%20Sec-
    tor%202014_%20UpdateJun2014.pdf, last accessed 2019/10/11.
 3. Charities Institute of Ireland: Charities 2037, https://www.charitiesinstituteireland.ie/s/S17-063-
    Charities-2037-Version-5-2410.pptx, last accessed 2019/10/11.
 4. Burt, E., Taylor, J.: New Technologies, Embedded Values, and Strategic Change: Evidence From
    the U.K. Voluntary Sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(1), 115-127 (2003).
 5. Carnochan, S., Samples, M., Myers, M., Austin, M. J.: Performance Measurement Challenges in
    Non-profit Human Service Organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43, 1014-
    1032 (2014).
 6. Jaskyte, K.: Predictors of Administrative and Technological Innovations in Nonprofit Organiza-
    tions. Public Administration Review, 71(1), 77-86 (2011).
 7. Volkoff, O., Strong, D. M.: Critical Realism and Affordances: Theorizing IT- Associated Or-
    ganisations Change Processes. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 819-834 (2013).
 8. Markus, M. L., Silver, M. S.: A Foundation for the Study of IT Effects: A New Look at DeSanctis
    and Poole's Concepts of Structural Features and Spirit. Journal of the Association for Infor-
    mation Systems, 9(10), 609-632 (2008).
 9. Collins, K.: Strategy, Leadership and Team Building. In: Transformational leadership and not
    for profits and social enterprises. Wiltshire, K., Malhotra, A., Axelsen, M. (eds.) Routledge,
    London (2018).
10. Weill, P., Woerner, S. L.: Is Your Company Ready for a Digital Future. MIT Sloan Management
    Review, 59, 21-25 (2018).
11. Great British Bee Count, https://friendsoftheearth.uk/bee-count, last accessed 2019/10/11.
12. No Lost Generation Task Force, https://solutionscenter.nethope.org/initiatives/nlg-tech-task-
    force, last accessed 2019/10/11.
13. Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative
    Research. Aldine, Chicago (1967).
14. Irish Charities Register, https://www.charitiesregulator.ie/en/information-for-the-public/search-
    the-charitiesregister, last accessed 2019/10/11.
15. Digital Nonprofit Skills Assessment 2018 Survey, https://solutionscenter.nethope.org/as-
    sets/collaterals/The-DNS-Assessment-White-Paper2018.pdf, last accessed 2019/10/11.