<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Towards an autonomous system with exhaled breath separation for cleaner condensed air samples</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Carlos Pizarro F.</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Cristobal J. Nettle</string-name>
          <email>nettle@innovacionyrobotica.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Oscar F. Araneda</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Marcelo Tuesta</string-name>
          <email>marcelo.tuesta@unab.cl</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Centro de Innovación y Robótica</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Escuela de Kinesiología, Facultad de Ciencias de la Rehabilitacion, Universidad Andres Bello</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Andres Bello</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>Laboratorio Integrativo de Biomecánica y Fisiología del Esfuerzo (LIBFE), Escuela de Kinesiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de los Andes</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4">
          <label>4</label>
          <institution>Laboratorio de Fisiología Cardiorrespiratoria, Centro de Rehabilitación Cardiovascular</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Doctor Jorge Kaplan Meyer</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The acquisition of condensed samples of exhaled air is a well-known noninvasive method for analyzing the healthiness of the lungs. Unlike other invasive methods as induced sputum or bronchoscopy, the condensate collection is faster and non-aggressive. During breathing, it is interesting to fractionate the sample in two differentiated portions as the first exhaled portion comes from a section of the respiratory way known as Dead Space, while the lasting exhaled portion comes from a section known as Alveolar Space. The liquid collected from the Dead Space contains a low-to-none density of biomarkers, which are mainly contained in the Alveolar Space's breathed air. Novel procedures have shown that separating the samples results in a more precise analysis of the state of the patient, improving the collected data for enhancing the current description of associated diseases. Here we describe a novel device and the associated theoretical bases for detecting and separating the exhaled air based on the source area. The implemented system integrates a closed loop for pressure control which operates on a three-ways balloon valve, based on the instantaneous exhaled amount of carbon dioxide following a proven methodology that dynamically fits the expected measured range a patient, providing a reliable cut-off among air spaces. The device, available in an open repository, besides being far less expensive than commercial devices provides a simpler and shorter method for acquiring samples.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        store in a single collecting cap all the condensed air, despite its origin (see a list of commercially
available devices in
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Konstantinidi et al. (2015)</xref>
        ). The collected samples, then, mainly derives from
conducting airways, being highly diluted lacking the presence of biomarkers. This is a known
problem of EBC and is barely assessed by requesting patients to perform slow breathing cycles,
having into account that the dilution can remarkably affect the sample composition
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Horváth et al.
(2017)</xref>
        .
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Here, we introduce a novel equipment which is able to separate the exhaled breath into two</title>
      <p>isolated samples: one collected sample contains condensed air from Dead Space areas (or
conducting ways), depositing into another cap condensed air mostly from Alveolar Space areas. Then,
this second cap contains the sample collected which is actually used for posterior biomarker’s
analysis, presenting a higher density and, therefor, efficacy in the collecting procedure and medical
evaluation.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>All codes developed for functioning and performing post-processing analysis, including examples</title>
      <p>of registered data, are available in an open repository1.</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Retrieving biomarkers from breathing areas</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Condensed samples</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>The EBC procedure allows to retrieve biomarkers in a simple, noninvasive fashion. Standard equipment captures exhaled air in an inner camera which has to be cold enough to provoke the condensation of the contained gas. Samples are then stored as liquid or frozen material for immediate or later analysis (Horváth et al., 2017).</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>The procedure for sampling collection only requires to have the patient to breath tidally using a</title>
      <p>
        nose clip. While it is common to request subjects to breath over a defined period of time (e.g., 15
min.), as the collected volume depends directly on this time
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">(Liu and Thomas, 2007)</xref>
        the absolute
time per patient can variate and be defined online by the medical examiner in order to retrieve a
volume sufficient enough for following examinations.
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-5-1">
        <title>Fractionated samples</title>
        <p>
          Recent proposals have shown that the efficacy in terms of density of biomarkers, measured as the
number of detected biomarkers, can be enhanced in a EBC procedure by separating the exhaled
air based on the proximity of its origin. The exhaled air is separated into either proximal – also
known as Dead Space (e.g., trachea) – or distal airways – also known as Alveolar Space –
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref5">(Corradi
et al., 2008; Hoffmeyer et al., 2009)</xref>
          . This origin may have an important effect in the composition of
the collected sample. Air from proximal airways contributes to a major dilution of the sample by
injecting condensed water while it can also increase the influence of ambient air into the sample
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">(Reinhold and Knobloch, 2010)</xref>
          .
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Developed equipment considering the separation of exhaled air is commercially unavailable</title>
      <p>
        (see e.g.,
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Goldoni et al. (2013)</xref>
        ). Its functional capabilities allow them to act as a proof of concept,
but lacks of a comprehensive description obstructing its reproducibility, and therefor its usability.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Tackling this problem, here we introduce the CK Flow Divider system, a novel equipment capable</title>
      <p>
        of performing an automatic separation of the exhaled air into two different collecting units: one
for air from Dead Space and another one for air from Alveolar Space. Using an online measure of
the exhaled CO2 based on the classical Fowler’s Model for classifying the origin of the air
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">(Fowler,
1948)</xref>
        and commercially available equipment (see following section), the CK Flow Divider system
constitutes a reproducible functional device for collecting separated condensed samples.
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-7-1">
        <title>The CK Flow Divider system: Functional Separation of Breathing Samples</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>The following section contains a full description of the CK Flow Divider system by introducing</title>
      <p>its composing parts and giving an architectural view. Each component, as described below, has
1Relevant codes and registered data presented here are publicly available at
https://github.com/Sobreviviente/Fractionated_exhaled_breath.</p>
      <p>Inhaling</p>
      <p>CO2&gt;1%</p>
      <p>Dead-air
Storage</p>
      <p>CO2&gt;50%</p>
      <p>Alveolar-air</p>
      <p>Storage
D</p>
      <p>S
CO2&lt;1%
A
S
specific responsibilities over the complete process of condensing and collecting exhaled air, as path
(hydraulic) separation, control, actuation and condensation.</p>
      <p>The CK Flow Divider is divided into four physically separable units:</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>1. Flow Carrier Unit or FCU: a set of hydraulic equipment that form the two ways for breath</title>
      <p>separation, including a T-Shape Inflatable Balloon-Type valve for flow switching.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>2. Air &amp; Data Supplier or AIS: a processing unit in charge of keeping a sustained air pressure for</title>
      <p>valve control, acquiring data, and computing control variables.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-11">
      <title>3. Air Switcher or AS: an actuator unit controlled by the AIS.</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-12">
      <title>4. Condenser: which receives the air flow from the FCU and condense it for sampling.</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-13">
      <title>The process of sampling acquisition is by itself divided into three temporally separated stages:</title>
      <p>inhaling, dead-air storage, and alveolar-air storage. Figure 1 shows the activation loop and control
events that constitute the transition between stages. The first stage lacks sample storage as the air
flow goes into the patient. The last two stages considers sample acquisition and are differentiated
by which output of the FCU is open, making the air flow to reach a different collecting unit in the</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-14">
      <title>Condenser.</title>
      <sec id="sec-14-1">
        <title>Flow Carrier Unit</title>
        <sec id="sec-14-1-1">
          <title>The FCU integrates a mouthpiece for placing the lips, a saliva collector, a CO2 sensor, a Three-Way</title>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-15">
      <title>T-Shape Inflatable Balloon-Type valve for separating the air flow and a One-Way respiratory valve for inhaling without contaminating the samples. The separated parts and the assembled unit are shown in figure 2 A and E, respectively. Unlike other devices, the mouthpiece can be decontaminated</title>
      <sec id="sec-15-1">
        <title>Air &amp; Data supplier</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-16">
      <title>This unit contains the micro-controller in charge of monitoring and controlling the breathing and</title>
      <p>storage cycle (see figure 2 D). It has to (1) determine the stage of the breathing cycle based on
online CO2 measures, and (2) provide the air pressure for inflating the balloon valve during stage
changes as shown in figure 1.</p>
      <sec id="sec-16-1">
        <title>Pressure control loop for inflating the balloon valve</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-17">
      <title>The Air &amp; Data supplier incorporates a closed air circuit which has to keep a pressure above</title>
      <sec id="sec-17-1">
        <title>6 [psi] ù 41:4 [psi], nominal pressure for inflating the balloon-type valve. The pressure of the</title>
        <p>circuit is monitored using a MP3V5050DP sensor. The implemented control regulates the pressure
considering hysteresis: whenever the pressure drops below 49 [kpa] the system activates two rolling
pump model KPM27C in charge of introducing air. The rolling pumps are deactivated when the
pressure reaches 50 [kpa].</p>
        <p>Solenoid valves Electronics
Inflating outputs:
Left and right baloons</p>
        <p>D</p>
        <p>Micro-controller
Air-Pump bombs
Pressure sensor
Air tank</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-18">
      <title>For storing the air, the closed circuit has a small tank for high pressure compressed air (shown in figure 2 D). This tank act as the air providing unit for inflating the balloons at the T-Shape valve.</title>
      <p>CO2-based control loop</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-19">
      <title>The implemented algorithm for detecting the origin of the exhaled air is based in Fowler’s model</title>
      <p>
        for describing Dead Space
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">(Fowler, 1948)</xref>
        . Fowler’s model states that a suitable approximation for
the point where the origin can be considered as Dead Space (instead of Alveolar Space) is such as
when the exhaled CO2 reaches the 50~ of its maximum value.
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-19-1">
        <title>In order to estimate the C50 (i.e., the point where the expelled CO2 reaches the half of the</title>
        <p>maximum amplitude), at every breathing cycle the maximum and minimum sensed CO2 are stored.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-20">
      <title>Now, as in an online evaluation the maximum amplitude of a running breathing cycle is unknown,</title>
      <p>
        the CK Flow Divider uses an average of the last three stored measures as in
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Goldoni et al. (2013)</xref>
        .
Figure 4 shows the actual value and the online estimation of the C50. As shown, the online
estimation is able to follow the actual value without introducing specific parameters for each
patient. Once the C50 is reached, the stage passes from Dead-air storage to Alveolar-air storage,
deflating and inflating the proper balloons in the T-Shape valve, redirecting the air flow from one
cap tube to the other.
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-20-1">
        <title>For monitoring the CO2 levels, the micro-controller receives an analog signal from a Nihon</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-20-2">
        <title>Kohden OLG-2800K CO2 monitor, which incorporates a cap-ONE CO2 Sensor TG -920P. This signal is</title>
        <p>filtered using an exponential moving average with a smoothing factor = 0:95. The sampling rate
INFLATE</p>
        <p>Balloon</p>
        <p>SUSTAIN</p>
        <p>Balloon</p>
        <p>DEFLATE</p>
        <p>Balloon</p>
        <p>High
pressure
circuit
Open
output</p>
        <p>High
pressure
circuit
Open
output</p>
        <p>High
pressure
circuit
Open
output
Two-way Solenoid valve</p>
        <p>Two-way Solenoid valve</p>
        <p>Two-way Solenoid valve
Single-way Solenoid valve</p>
        <p>Single-way Solenoid valve</p>
        <p>Single-way Solenoid valve</p>
        <sec id="sec-20-2-1">
          <title>Air Switcher</title>
          <p>The Air Switcher (shown in figure 2 B) is a purely actuator device fully controlled by the Air &amp; Data
supplier unit. This device contains the hardware necessary for inflating and deflating each balloon
of the T-Shape valve. It receives a connection from the air tank of the Air &amp; Data supplier, and
switches between connecting a balloon either with the high pressure closed circuit for inflation, or
to the environment for deflation. In order to be able to inflate and deflate each balloon separately,
the Air Switcher incorporates two solenoid valves for each pathway (two valves for controlling a
single balloon). The first one is a two-way solenoid valve which once activated inflates its respective
balloon (see left diagram in figure 3). The second solenoid valve allows to either deflate (once open)
or sustain (kept closed) the air inside the balloon (see center and right diagrams in figure 3).</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-20-2-2">
          <title>Condenser</title>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-21">
      <title>The Condenser unit (red receptacle in figure 2 E) is form by two separated sample containers (cap</title>
      <p>tubes, figure 2 C). The containers receive the air flow through a Y shaped glass pipe. Both, the
container and the glass pipe, are surrounded by cold-packs producing the condensation of the air
into a liquid sample. In order to keep the temperature inside a functional range, each sampling
acquisition requires a set-up replacing the cold-packs, forcing to have at least two sets of them.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-22">
      <title>Then, while a sampling process is being performed, the second set can be stored in a freezing unit for lowering its temperature again.</title>
      <p>Detection of Dead Space and Alveolar air separation
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
Time [s]</p>
      <sec id="sec-22-1">
        <title>Preliminary results</title>
        <sec id="sec-22-1-1">
          <title>In order to ensure the precision of the detection of the C50 (i.e., the point where the exhaled CO2</title>
          <p>reaches the half of its maximum value) we have done off-line processing of registered data during a
single examination. The collected data, presented in figure 4, shows 20 breathing cycles performed
by a patient. Red dots in the figure shows the point for which the measured CO2 reaches the
half of the maximum for that specific breathing cycle. The figure also shows in green dots online
estimated points based on the last three breathing cycles and, therefore, the point where the CK</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-23">
      <title>Flow Divider system changes the breathing stage and the currently inflated balloon. The presented</title>
      <p>data shows how the estimated point adjusts after a change in the maximum exhaled CO2 (shown
after a saturation of the sensor before the breathing cycle at t = 60 [s], which also do not break
the estimation process). Then, all the estimated points are at least situated in the curve section
associated with Alveolar air during each breathing cycle.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-24">
      <title>The CK Flow Divider has been tested by performing the full acquisition process in 8 subjects.</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-25">
      <title>The experiments show a continuous operation of the system with a systematic separation of the</title>
      <p>
        air flow. The CK Flow Divider adjusts to each patient range of expelled CO2, ensuring the breath
separation with respect to its origin: Dead Space or Alveolar Space. The condensed samples (see
figure 5) show a volume difference of 50 , 10~, coherent with previous results from
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Möller et al.
(2010)</xref>
        , being Alveolar-air storage roughly twice the volume from Dead-air storage.
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-25-1">
        <title>Discussion</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-26">
      <title>Following the obtained results, in an extreme case where all Dead-air storage is condensed water</title>
      <p>from Dead Space areas, the efficacy of the condensed samples (i.e. the number of biomarkers in a
certain volume) would be increase by three times. It is important to note that a posterior analysis
for quantifying the amount of biomarkers has to be done to determine the absolute contribution of
applying a Fractionated Exhaled Breath Condensate (FEBC).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-27">
      <title>More over, a wide testing of different materials has to be performed for characterizing the</title>
      <p>
        efficacy of the CK Flow Divider system for different biomarkers. Recent studies have shown how
the materials for the condenser unit can alter the samples as different coating materials introduce
different temperature curves
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">(Rosias et al., 2008)</xref>
        . The effect of the selection of the coating material
is such as it determines which biomarkers are going to be actually present in the acquired sample.
Such considerations has not been assessed in this study. The CK Flow Divider system lacks any
analysis with respect to the statistical acquisition of biomarkers, which as exposed depends on
the materials composing it. Once introduced the ability to store a cleaner condensed sample
coming from lung spaces specifically associated with alveolar air, a fully comprehensive analysis
has to be done, actualizing current knowledge about the dependency on retrieved biomakers with
respect to the coating material, as it dependency could be reduced or increased. Having performed
such analysis may contribute to introduce directions for standardizing separated exhaled breath
condensate sampling.
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-27-1">
        <title>Conclusions</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-28">
      <title>While further characterizations of the CK Flow Divider system must be accomplished, this device</title>
      <p>
        presents a fully reproducible equipment for achieving Separated Exhaled Breath Condensate. The
implementation of a commercial version of this device, with the appropriate considerations for
medical use, could replace a currently common invasive procedure for collecting lung biomarkers,
the bronchoscopy, a method for which statistics shows an important a risk of damage (10 ~ as
shown by
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">DeBoer et al. (2019)</xref>
        ). Its application, through a stand-alone fully noninvasive device
requiring a simple operation, can be considered for clinical environments and home health care (as
currently available EBC commercial devices, see
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Konstantinidi et al. (2015)</xref>
        ).
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-29">
      <title>Some following steps for improving the hardware of the CK Flow Divider system are the inte</title>
      <p>gration of volume sensors, allowing to directly register the amount of exhaled volume collected
into both caps separately. Others sensors for achieving a proper characterization and collection
of samples are temperature sensors for monitoring the Condenser unit. Also, integrating a CO2
sensor directly connected to the micro-controller would allow to bypass the use of a CO2 Monitor.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Corradi</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Goldoni</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Caglieri</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Folesani</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Poli</surname>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Corti</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mutti</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Collecting exhaled breath condensate (EBC) with two condensers in series: a promising technique for studying the mechanisms of EBC formation, and the volatility of selected biomarkers</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery</source>
          .
          <year>2008</year>
          ;
          <volume>21</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>35</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>44</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>DeBoer</surname>
            <given-names>E</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Houin</surname>
            <given-names>P</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Towler</surname>
            <given-names>E</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kerby</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stillwell</surname>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>How Safe Is Flexible</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Bronchoscopy? Six Years of Pediatric Bronchoscopy Outcomes</article-title>
          . In:
          <article-title>A53. CLINICAL STUDIES IN NEONATAL AND PEDIATRIC LUNG DISEASE</article-title>
          AND
          <string-name>
            <surname>CYSTIC FIBROSIS American Thoracic Society</surname>
          </string-name>
          ;
          <year>2019</year>
          .p.
          <fpage>A1904</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>A1904</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Fowler</given-names>
            <surname>WS</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Lung function studies. II. The respiratory dead space</article-title>
          .
          <source>American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content</source>
          .
          <year>1948</year>
          ;
          <volume>154</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>405</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>416</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Goldoni</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Corradi</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mozzoni</surname>
            <given-names>P</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Folesani</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alinovi</surname>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pinelli</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Andreoli</surname>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pigini</surname>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tillo</surname>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Filetti</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , et al.
          <article-title>Concentration of exhaled breath condensate biomarkers after fractionated collection based on exhaled CO2 signal</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of breath research</source>
          .
          <year>2013</year>
          ;
          <volume>7</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>017101</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hoffmeyer</surname>
            <given-names>F</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Raulf-Heimsoth</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Harth</surname>
            <given-names>V</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bünger</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brüning</surname>
            <given-names>T</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Comparative analysis of selected exhaled breath biomarkers obtained with two different temperature-controlled devices</article-title>
          .
          <source>BMC pulmonary medicine</source>
          .
          <year>2009</year>
          ;
          <volume>9</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>48</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Horváth</surname>
            <given-names>I</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Barnes</surname>
            <given-names>PJ</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Loukides</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sterk</surname>
            <given-names>PJ</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Högman</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Olin</surname>
            <given-names>AC</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Amann</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Antus</surname>
            <given-names>B</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Baraldi</surname>
            <given-names>E</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bikov</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , et al.
          <article-title>A European Respiratory Society technical standard: exhaled biomarkers in lung disease</article-title>
          .
          <source>European Respiratory Journal</source>
          .
          <year>2017</year>
          ;
          <volume>49</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>1600965</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Konstantinidi</surname>
            <given-names>EM</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lappas</surname>
            <given-names>AS</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tzortzi</surname>
            <given-names>AS</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Behrakis</surname>
            <given-names>PK</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Exhaled breath condensate: technical and diagnostic aspects</article-title>
          .
          <source>The Scientific World Journal</source>
          .
          <year>2015</year>
          ;
          <year>2015</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Thomas</surname>
            <given-names>PS</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Relationship between exhaled breath condensate volume and measurements of lung volumes</article-title>
          .
          <source>Respiration</source>
          .
          <year>2007</year>
          ;
          <volume>74</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>142</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>145</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Möller</surname>
            <given-names>W</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Heimbeck</surname>
            <given-names>I</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Weber</surname>
            <given-names>N</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Saba</surname>
            <given-names>GK</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Körner</surname>
            <given-names>B</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Neiswirth</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kohlhäufl</surname>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Fractionated exhaled breath condensate collection shows high hydrogen peroxide release in the airways</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery</source>
          .
          <year>2010</year>
          ;
          <volume>23</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>129</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>135</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Reinhold</surname>
            <given-names>P</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Knobloch</surname>
            <given-names>H</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Exhaled breath condensate: lessons learned from veterinary medicine</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of breath research</source>
          .
          <year>2010</year>
          ;
          <volume>4</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>017001</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rosias</surname>
            <given-names>PP</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Robroeks</surname>
            <given-names>CM</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kester</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>den Hartog</surname>
            <given-names>GJ</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wodzig</surname>
            <given-names>WK</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rijkers</surname>
            <given-names>GT</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zimmermann</surname>
            <given-names>LJ</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>van Schayck</surname>
            <given-names>CP</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jöbsis</surname>
            <given-names>Q</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dompeling</surname>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Biomarker reproducibility in exhaled breath condensate collected with different condensers</article-title>
          .
          <source>European Respiratory Journal</source>
          .
          <year>2008</year>
          ;
          <volume>31</volume>
          (
          <issue>5</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>934</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>942</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>