<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Reddit Mining to Understand Women's Issues in STEM</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Allison Jacobs</string-name>
          <email>adjacobs@uwaterloo.ca</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Shivangi Chopra</string-name>
          <email>s9chopra@uwaterloo.ca</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Lukasz Golab</string-name>
          <email>lgolab@uwaterloo.ca</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>University of Waterloo</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Waterloo, Ontario</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="CA">Canada</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>We analyze social media discussions to understand the issues experienced by women in Science, Technology, Mathematics and Engineering (STEM), both in the classroom and at work. To do so, we identify two relevant discussion forums on the Reddit social media platform: r/womenEngineers and r/xxSTEM, and we perform topic modelling to discover frequently discussed topics. Our analysis leads to three main findings. First, women discuss harassment, inequality, and lack of representation. These issues were found to persist in both academic and professional environments. Second, women express a lack of confidence and feelings of being an imposter as well as having to change their appearance and behaviour to fit in with their coworkers. These issues again did not disappear after academic life but tended to persist into professional careers. Finally, some women were faced with a lack of parental leave policies at their organizations.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>Keywords: Women in Engineering, STEM, Social Media
Mining, Text Mining, Gender Imbalance</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>INTRODUCTION</title>
      <p>
        In recent years, marketing various Science, Technology,
Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) programs to young women has
become important to post-secondary institutions in an attempt
to even the gender gap [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. As a result, the percentage of women
enrolled and graduating from engineering programs has seen
improvement over the past decade [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">23</xref>
        ]. That said, the proportion
of female graduates earning bachelor’s degrees in fields such
as computer science and engineering is still low (around 20%)
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23 ref51">23, 51</xref>
        ]. Although the attraction to engineering and the success
rates from an academic standpoint are increasing, there is a large
percentage of women who do not pursue a career in engineering
or leave the workforce [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. For example, a longitudinal study
with 87 men and 34 women chemical engineering
undergraduates found that women scored better than men on pre-college
admission tests and were highly motivated at the start of their
program, but, by the end of their sophomore year, twice the
percentage of women, in comparison to men, dropped out [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>
        ].
Studies also suggest that many female engineering graduates
switch out of the field right after graduation or sometime after
joining the workforce [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>
        ]. Overall, women make up less than
14 percent of the professional engineering workforce in Canada,
a number that has remained constant for some time [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Prior work has studied gender diferences in STEM academics
and careers from various perspectives, including diferences in
biology, aptitude, attitude, motivation, interests, performance,
choice, socio-cultural factors, and opportunity [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">55</xref>
        ]. With a focus
on women’s barriers to entry and attrition [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18 ref49">18, 49</xref>
        ], studies have
listed issues such as dissatisfaction over pay and promotion
opportunities [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>
        ], self-doubt [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17 ref18 ref48">17, 18, 48</xref>
        ], lifestyle values of raising
a family and altruism [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52 ref55">52, 55</xref>
        ], under-representation [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ], and
sexism [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18 ref9">9, 18</xref>
        ]. However, most of this research is based on samples
collected during interviews and is mostly qualitative.
      </p>
      <p>
        In the context of data-intensive work on gender issues, there
is work that analyzed gender diferences in undergraduate
Engineering applicants [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ] and work-integrated learning programs
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12 ref13">12, 13</xref>
        ], and social media mining studies of the #MeToo [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30 ref37 ref43">30, 37,
43</xref>
        ] and the #ILookLikeAnEngineer [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">28</xref>
        ] movements. With social
media providing an anonymous environment to discuss sensitive
topics [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">54</xref>
        ], it has been used to analyze issues such as suicide [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">26</xref>
        ],
domestic violence [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46 ref47">46, 47</xref>
        ], mental health [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15 ref31 ref41">15, 31, 41</xref>
        ], bullying
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">58</xref>
        ], and racial inequality [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
        ]. However, we are not aware of
any social media mining studies that analyze women’s issues in
STEM.
      </p>
      <p>
        To fill this gap, we contribute to the research on gender issues
in STEM by analyzing the Reddit social media platform. We
identified two Reddit discussion forums — r/womenEngineers and
r/xxSTEM — designed for women to share their experiences in
STEM academics and workforce, and to ofer advice to others
considering or newly entering the STEM workforce. Specifically, the
goal of this analysis is to identify topics that are frequently
discussed by women in STEM. To do so, we perform topic modelling
of the content of the above Reddit forums between December
2015 and February 2019, using Non-negative Matrix Factorization
(NMF) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">40</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Our analysis leads to three main findings. First, women
discuss harassment, inequality, and lack of representation. These
issues were found to persist in both academic and professional
environments. Second, women express a lack of confidence and
feelings of being an imposter as well as having to change their
appearance and behaviour to fit in with their coworkers. These
issues also did not disappear after academic life but persisted
into professional careers. Finally, some women were faced with
a lack of parental leave policies at their organizations. Our social
media analysis confirms the findings obtained by qualitative prior
work and provides more specific details into the barriers faced
by women in STEM.</p>
      <p>The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2
explains our dataset and method; Section 3 presents the results;
Section 4 discusses our findings and compares them to prior work;
and Section 5 concludes the paper with directions for future work.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>DATA AND METHOD</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Data</title>
      <p>Reddit is a social media platform divided into discussion forums
referred to as subreddits. A subreddit contains posts that initiate a
discussion, and comments on the posts. This analysis is based on
Reddit data from December 2015 to February 2019, downloaded
from a publicly available database stored on Google Big Query1.
1https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/</p>
      <p>There are over one million subreddits in total. To find those
which are most closely related to our study of issues experienced
by women in STEM, we first identified all subreddits
containing at least one of the following terms in their title: “women”,
“engineer”, “STEM”, or “feminism”. We selected these words to
capture elements of STEM, specifically engineering, as well as
feminism. We then read a sample of recent posts in each of these
subreddits to determine the topics being discussed among posts
as well as common themes in the discussions. We selected two
subreddits for analysis — r/womenEngineers and r/xxSTEM —
that included discussions of gender issues in STEM education
and workplace. Examples of subreddits that we examined but
discarded are r/Feminism (containing discussions of gender issues,
but not related to STEM), r/AskEngineers (containing questions
about engineering education and careers, but not from a gender
perspective), and r/AskWomen (containing women’s perspective
on various issues, but not related to STEM).</p>
      <p>
        Table 1 contains some statistics for each of the chosen
subreddits. The number of unique users is the number of users who
created at least one post or comment on the forum, whereas
onetime users are those who only created one post or comment. Over
half the users on both forums are one-time users, a trend
previously observed in social media by [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15 ref41">15, 41</xref>
        ]. Notably, the number
of users who posted or commented at least once on both forums
is only 31, suggesting that the content on r/womenEngineers
and r/xxSTEM may be diferent, and thus motivating the need to
analyze both of these forums.
      </p>
      <p>We inspected a sample of posts and comments from the two
selected subreddits. We observed that a post starts a conversation
and the sharing of experiences, but the comments on each post
provide more insight into experiences and issues faced.
Additionally, there are more comments than posts in total. As a result, we
selected only the comments for further analysis.
2.2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Method</title>
      <p>Our method to analyze the comments made on r/womenEngineers
and r/xxSTEM is summarized in Figure 1 and detailed below.</p>
      <p>
        Data pre-processing: We discarded comments of the form
“[REMOVED]” and “[DELETED]”, indicating that they were
removed by Reddit moderators. For the remaining comments, we
used Ekphrasis [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] to parse them, normalize the words, remove
stopwords, and correct spelling errors. There were originally
1095 comments in r/womenEngineers and 2446 in r/xxSTEM.
Discarding the deleted comments, we are left with 1041 and 2305,
respectively, as reported in Table 1.
      </p>
      <p>Topic Modeling: Next, we run the Non-negative Matrix
Factorization (NMF) algorithm to segment the comments and
identify underlying topics. NMF groups the comments into k clusters,
with k being a user-specified parameter, and identifies a set of
representative terms, which we refer to as topic keywords, for
each cluster.</p>
      <p>
        To decide on the number of clusters or topics, we experimented
with k ∈ {10, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400}, and computed the coherence
of each choice [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">38</xref>
        ]. Topic coherence allows for analysis to
determine the extent to which the top terms representing a topic
are semantically related, relative to some "background corpus".
A higher coherence is desirable.
      </p>
      <p>We plot the coherence as a function of the number of topics
in r/womenEngineers and r/xxSTEM in Figure 2 and Figure 3,
respectively. The y-axes of the figures start at 0.9, not 0, to
emphasize the diferences in coherence. For r/womenEngineers, k = 50
has the highest coherence. For r/xxSTEM, highest coherence
occured at 200 topics, but the coherence at 50 topics was nearly
as high. Standard data science practice dictates an afinity for a
smaller model, and to maintain consistency across subreddits,
we chose k = 50 for both subreddits.</p>
      <p>To verify the choice of k, we manually inspected the
representative terms of each cluster for each tested value of k. For k &lt; 50,
NMF returned terms that suggested several topics per cluster,
whereas larger values of k produced clusters of repeating topics.</p>
      <p>Topic Analysis: In this step, we manually examined the
keywords returned by NMF for each topic, and we analyzed the
comments belonging to each topic. Finally, after inspecting the
topic keywords and reading a sample of comments assigned
to each topic, we manually extracted five frequently discussed
themes that will be discussed below.
models.
3
3.1</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>RESULTS</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Topic Analysis</title>
      <p>Table 2 and Table 3 show the topic keywords produced by NMF
for five largest topics for the two subreddits, as well as the
number of comments categorized under each of these topics. For
r/womenEngineers, the terms suggest frequent discussions of
classroom experiences, job interview experiences, parental leave,
and pay. For r/xxSTEM, the representative terms suggest
discussions of gender bias and gender gap.</p>
      <p>We identified the following five themes that frequently
occurred in the discussions on both subreddits. Notably, these five
themes were present both in discussions of academic and
workplace issues.</p>
      <p>(1) Representation: discussions of the lack of representation
of women.
(2) Personal: an experience that was unique to the person; e.g.,
an encounter that was sexist or classified as harassment.
(3) Confidence: imposter syndrome or other internal battles,
i.e., feelings of inadequacy or self-doubt.
(4) Interests: expressions of interests that have allowed women
to continue or discontinue their engineering career.
(5) Equality: comparisons to another gender or person.
3.2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>Analysis of r/womenEngineers</title>
      <p>We now discuss the above five themes in more detail, starting
with r/womenEngineers. Table 4 summarizes the types of issues
discussed under each theme in the context of academics and
careers.</p>
      <p>In terms of academics, we found Equality to be frequently
discussed. This includes women comparing themselves to their
male peers and discussing experiences in which they were treated
diferently. We give an example comment below.</p>
      <p>Equality: “I recently worked with a male project partner on an
electronics project for grad school, he didn’t know how to hook up
the multimeter to measure current. Was that failure of knowledge
because he was male? Nope, he just didn’t have much hands-on
experience with hardware. I think a lot of women growing up do
really well in school (which is often theory heavy) but aren’t
necessarily ofered the practical experience outside of school. Men are
assumed to like tools and technology from a young age so it’s more
likely their family members give them gifts that align with those
things and invite them to talk about and participate in engineering
related projects. So, it can seem like women aren’t as good but the
actual reason isn’t gender but societal influence.”</p>
      <p>The Personal theme was also frequent. In these comments,
women were recounting experiences of harassment from their
school life.</p>
      <p>Personal: "Guy in charge of the school machine shop who sets
all the equipment for his size at 6’3” where I am 5’3”: why are you
on your tip toes, you cut like a girl (how does one cut like a girl on
a band saw?)"</p>
      <p>Next, the topic of Representation included comments
discussing the lack of female classmates, faculty members, and role</p>
      <p>Representation: "I went to school in a mostly male major, and
I’m currently working in automotive manufacturing. It’s great
having male friends, but every now and then I just want to be able to sit
down and talk about nail polish colors with other girls. It’s good for
your health, plus there’s a lot of conversations that are girls-only.</p>
      <p>My company is really small, so there’s not too many women I can
hang out with after work. But it makes it so much more worth while
when I get that little break and I hangout with other girls!"</p>
      <p>Confidence discussions frequented around the theme of
imposter syndrome and self-doubt. Women discussed the guilt they
felt for receiving scholarships and in general any form of
academic success.</p>
      <p>Confidence: "That being said, I have also sufered from “Imposter
Syndrome” a lot recently, so I completely understand where you are
coming from. It’s intimidating being in a field dominated by men
where you basically stick out like a sore thumb. All you can do is
your best and seek feedback/guidance whenever possible."</p>
      <p>Finally, Interests included discussions about the impact of
engineering on the community as well as the reasons why the
individual has chosen to pursue an engineering education.</p>
      <p>Interests: "I was pretty lucky. Several adults recognized my
aptitude for engineering before I knew engineering was a thing. I was
encouraged by my dad and several teachers to continue developing
my skills in math and science, because I always excelled in those.</p>
      <p>Once I realized that I could use those skills (which I also genuinely
enjoyed) to help contribute to new technology, I felt it was a perfect
ift. I always had a passion for learning, so I wanted to be at the
vanguard, learning all the time."</p>
      <p>At the career level, many comments referred to Personal
experiences. This includes sharing experiences of sexism, harassment
or other uncomfortable encounters. We show an example below.</p>
      <p>Personal:“I know it sucks to hear, but you need to grow tougher
skin and stand your ground. You need to pull that guy aside and
frankly tell him that you’re not interested. If he continues to harass
you, that is where you would consider going to the Title IX
department. Continuous harassment being saying inappropriate things to
you, gossiping about you behind your back, or sending you sexually
explicit images/messages. I had to go there to file a claim against a
GTA who blatantly sexually harassed me and they’re nothing but
welcoming.”</p>
      <p>For the theme of Equality, women compared themselves to
their male coworkers and commented on the wage gap.</p>
      <p>Equality: "I was in the same boat as you. I was paid way less
than my male colleagues had more education - master’s degree
vs colleagues having bachelor’s or some no degree. I was the only
female engineer and other female engineers who started in my
department were moved to non technical positions. (No idea if that
is what they wanted just something I noticed) I was given the soft
jobs, less technical and after over a year of asking for the more
interesting technical jobs, I ended up applying to other jobs out of
the company and left for job that paid me 20% more and for more
Topic 47: go would make thing also say school ask difer experi lot find woman someth men class talk much could student
well someon like sure back work male start think engin
Topic 0: like feel general seem person thing someth respons interview scienc right black field sometim part understand life
crap yeah uncomfort awkward fashion may gender expect math unfair non shadow struggl
Topic 3: number year graduat school go age start semest senior program week percent kid leav hour month never back gone
bachelor three worri junior money pay employe class next long
Topic 2: engin degre field mechan comput studi mani life mind electr industri scienc sub probabl area graduat hey better
tech male see chang thread relat societi live question lot design role
Topic 33: wear shirt casual jean ofic blous dress slack black pant heel cardigan button comfort nice shoe color flat hair
occasion cloth busi manufactur boot usual feminin tend fashion coupl tech
Topic 46: think want need way ask also could see even someth talk difer take person someon experi find use question point
start right lot guy give meet never may team happen
Topic 7: women men stem gender issu confer woman bias male field tech societi support group mani secur hire career us
young think lot equal gap reason problem posit cultur treat event
Topic 9: week last start next project today back bridg pe hour plan review trip still weekend busi big finish coupl current
alreadi excit hous glad super new fire home friday laterg
Topic 42: program degre phd scienc year appli comput internship univers requir start master interest graduat cs math stem
also lab student mani data undergradu languag research applic ofer cours field colleg
Topic 23: school grad student high undergrad gpa appli depart physic stress math colleg univers year lot went back choic
learn first late graduat still strong professor anxieti guy start top major
technical and interesting work. And I’m good at it :)"</p>
      <p>Representation again discusses the lack of female coworkers
or what it feels like to be the first female employee hired at a
company. One comment example is below.</p>
      <p>Representation: "If you aren’t able to find that within your own
organization, look to similar ones. At my last job I was the only
woman in our entire department, and the only women more senior
than myself were in HR and Marketing (not that I was that senior,
it’s just that I worked at a brewery and there just aren’t a lot of
women). So I attended professional events like SWE and also
industry specific events, and found women who were in those higher
level positions but with diferent companies. I also met women just
through the vendors and contractors I worked alongside. One of the
biggest mentors I had was the COO of one of our vendor companies,
and I met her because she happened to come on site one day to see
how our installation and testing was going."</p>
      <p>Confidence discussions again related to the imposter
syndrome and understanding one’s worth within the company.</p>
      <p>Confidence: "The larger point to understand here is how the
system being tilted in your favor doesn’t do you any favors. Now a
feeling of imposter-syndrome goes from being an
anxiety-inducedfabrication to justified and you can’t really tell how much of it
is justified vs. emotional until you’re on the job and start
accomplishing tasks. Because the tilt of the system has pulled you ahead
of yourself you cannot perform. Because you cannot perform you
cannot be trusted with critical tasks. Because you are not trusted
with worthwhile tasks you do not improve."</p>
      <p>In a career context, discussions of Interests included reasons
why women decided on their careers, and reasons for leaving a
job. Furthermore, commenters discussed the consequences
associated with deciding to start a family and the potential glass
ceiling issues associated with promotions and career growth.</p>
      <p>Interests: "The worst issue was at my last job when my boss and
I sat down to discuss my "5-year plan" and mentioned how I may
want to get switch jobs due to the heavy travel in a few years when
I meet a man and want to settle down. I told him nope that I love
my job and don’t plan to leave because of the travel and possible
children (which is light years away, if at all). He said well, we’ll
keep it in mind that you might want to slow down."
3.3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>Analysis of r/xxSTEM</title>
      <p>This analysis was repeated in the same manner for the second
subreddit, r/xxSTEM. Table 5 summarizes the academic and
career issues discussed on this forum.</p>
      <p>For Academic issues, many discussions were Personal. This
included recounts of comparisons and assumptions made about
a student based on their gender or recounts of harassment. We
give an example comment below.</p>
      <p>Personal: "Of course you got a job at [company]. You’re a girl."
– classmate. "Girls get all the scholarships." - classmate "Being a
woman must have helped you get the job." - my FEMALE co-op
coordinator "I never hire women. All they do is get pregnant and go
on maternity leave." - my sister’s boss</p>
      <p>Discussions of Equality described how to be seen and not
treated diferently from male peers. An example of this is below.</p>
      <p>Equality: “In my high school, girls were actively discouraged/not
allowed to take these classes. I wanted to take wood shop, but wasn’t
allowed. I ended up doing theatre and learned to build sets instead.”</p>
      <p>One commenter discusses her early exposure to STEM and its
impact.</p>
      <p>Equality: "I was lucky my parents did this while I was growing up.
I helped my Dad with his construction projects, he helped my sibling
and I with our homework (math &amp; sci included), he took us to his
work and other future engineering events, we had legos and K’nex,
and his friends/coworkers were fairly diverse engineers. I was not
aware that women were an oddity in STEM until late in highschool"</p>
      <p>Representation discussions followed similar themes present
in r/womenEngineers.</p>
      <p>Representation: "Of the 104 people who are “members of the
department” (PhD candidates, instructors, professors, research faculty,
and post docs) only 17 are women. And 9 of those 17 are professors
or instructors and thus have keys to private restrooms. It just pisses
me of that I’m so non existent to the department that I have to go
down 4 floors for a bathroom when my ofice and lab are up here.
I’m an undergrad at an R1 school with 40,000 people."
Interests focused on the dificulties starting a family in academia.</p>
      <p>Interests: "The thing that really annoys me is that academia in
general is terrible at taking care of parents, especially mothers. My
graduate school didn’t have a maternity leave policy in place until
two years ago. They presented that policy at the school wellness
meeting and it was SO embarrassing. But even that maternity leave
policy is terrible. Only 4 weeks paid leave and that’s only for the
mother. Anyways this is a long way of saying I agree with you and
I think the above stuf is a lot of the reason why women get lost
in the academia pipeline. They are basically actively punished for
wanting a family."</p>
      <p>Confidence was commonly challenged for female students,
which has led them to feelings of self-doubt.</p>
      <p>Confidence: "How do you know you got accepted purely on merit
and not because you are a woman filling their quota?" Said to me
by a woman. I don’t think she knows that 3/4 of my class and every
class below me has been female. We’re not filling a quota,
apparently women have stronger applications on average."</p>
      <p>At the career level, Equality and Personal issues made up most
of the comments. Below is an example of a comment discussing
Equality.</p>
      <p>Equality: “Women are consistently held to an impossibly higher
standard compared to men in life in general it seems. So, if your
experience in life is that you have to be pretty damn near perfect,
you’re not going apply to something that you know you won’t get
if you don’t meet all the qualifications for. Whilst your male
colleagues, who society just automatically gives more respect to, can
aford to apply to things without all the qualifications.”</p>
      <p>An example of a positive comment on equality is shown below.</p>
      <p>Equality: "Yes it does! But not everywhere. The big tech
companies are great and actively work to make women and other minority
groups feel welcome. I had a similar experience to you in school,
constantly feeling like an outsider. After a few years of work and
picking the right companies, I’m happy to say I feel accepted as
an engineer— not just a female engineer. Echoing a commenter
above, don’t forget to advocate for yourself. You are your own best
cheerleader and won’t be happy in any situation if you let people
push you around."</p>
      <p>Another commenter further discusses comments made to them
about wage gaps and other general comparisons to their male
coworkers.</p>
      <p>Equality: " 1. "Have fun making .75 for every dollar a man
makes." 2. "You’re only here to get your Mrs. degree." Which is a
degree made up to imply that I’m only in college to find a husband
to support me. I am currently on a web development team and
my supervisor is female, but the rest of my team of 2 besides me
are male. It is so important for more women to be in the
engineering/computer science field. Best of luck, engineering is tough but
it’s worth it!"</p>
      <p>Personal experiences including sexism were common as well
as general gender bias.</p>
      <p>Personal: "I never reported my harassers. Other women at the
company reported their harassers and those women never worked
there much longer. I wish I had been brave enough to do it but
I saw the pattern of report, quit or be fired and decided I wasn’t
ready to leave yet. I was the only woman on the team for a long
while. I left the job this past August and moved to a way less hostile
environment."</p>
      <p>Although women know there are a lack of role models in their
ifelds, there are those who are determined to see this change.
One comment reads:</p>
      <p>Representation: "I came here to say this, a lot is based in gender
expectations and a lack of inspirational role models, you rarely see
women in these roles in the media and that needs to be challenged
and improved. It’s one of the reasons that I do outreach. It annoys
me but I know that by being there I am showing that women can
and do have jobs like this."</p>
      <p>A recurring theme in the discussion of Interests was again
focused on maternity leave policies and how this impacts the
choice of company in the future.</p>
      <p>Interests: "The culture will vary company to company. I would
recommend reaching out to mothers/women you can identify on
LinkedIn or through other networking and contact them directly to
ask about this info. This is the kind of thing where you really do
have to talk to employees outside the interview context to
understand the company culture and how that influences use of maternity
leave policies."</p>
      <p>Finally discussions of Confidence again revolve around
selfdoubt.</p>
      <p>Confidence: "We have a weekly status meeting as a team, and I
always make sure to talk about 2-3 things I did. The problem is if
someone else talks about something before I get a chance, there’s
no need to repeat what’s already been said. I definitely have a
confidence problem. I still feel really unsure of what I’m doing,
which is why I usually seek confirmation from someone else. I think
I’m really afraid to mess up or seem like I don’t know what I’m
doing. "
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>DISCUSSION AND RELATED WORK</title>
      <p>In general, this analysis revealed negative results. One reason for
the lack of positive discussions is that anonymous social media
platforms often provide a way to vent, or discuss problems and
invite guidance and support from those who have experienced
similar situations.</p>
      <p>Below, we reiterate our main findings, organized around our
ifve themes, and compare them to those reported in prior work.</p>
      <p>
        Confidence: Women shared their problems with confidence
in their academics and careers or experienced some type of
imposter syndrome and self-doubt. Past studies support this finding
and report that women start college with a lower self-confidence
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">57</xref>
        ], a lower self-concept about their performance in STEM
courses [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44 ref45">44, 45</xref>
        ], and a lower self-eficacy [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34 ref39">34, 39</xref>
        ]. As students
progressed through the curriculum, bad grades led to greater
drops in self-esteem for women in engineering [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
        ]. Additionally,
Fouad et. al found that women who leave engineering have lower
levels of self-eficacy than women who stay in the profession [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">36</xref>
        ].
Other studies also identify self-doubt as an important reason for
women’s attrition from STEM [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17 ref18 ref48">17, 18, 48</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Representation: We found that support and mentorship are
critical to combating the confidence issues women may face.
Women noted that mentorship was dificult to find in a
maledominated workforce. We found that women were frequently
asking for resources in which they can find the support that is
lacking in the workplace environment. Past studies support this
ifnding and suggest that under-representation may discourage
females to pursue or continue in STEM [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref50">10, 50</xref>
        ]. Similarly, Cadaret
et al. suggest that career interventions can assist young women
to strengthen their expectations for success in engineering fields,
thus expanding their social support and improving their identity
as engineers through efective mentoring [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">33</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Further to this, we found that improper forms of education
counselling may prevent women from pursuing a STEM related
career. Studies show that a female student’s choice not to pursue
a career in STEM is not due to their lack of technical skills, but
rather the perception of a lack of skills by parents, counsellors and
students themselves [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5 ref53 ref55">5, 53, 55</xref>
        ]. Textbooks mentioning the work
and photographs of male scientists propagate a similar gender
bias [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ], emphasizing the social and occupational segregation of
gender [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">32</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Interests: In the discussions of interests, we note that women
discussed the implications of starting a family while also trying to
succeed in their career. Studies have noted similar circumstances
afecting women’s careers, such as raising children,
accommodating a spouse’s career, or caring for elderly family members
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22 ref52 ref55 ref7">7, 22, 52, 55</xref>
        ]. Women also described cases of discrimination and
poor infrastructure in their workplace as they may have been the
only employee pregnant at a time or one of a limited number of
female employees. One civil engineer recounts her experience by
noting that she was the first female her employer has ever hired,
and that the maternity policy was never needed before her. It
was also noted that although Information Technology related
industries are implementing maternity policies, industries such as
construction are failing to change to meet the needs of their
employees, specifically women. This underscores the need for clear
parental leave information dissemination to all employees. Wang
and Degol note similar issues in STEM workplaces which often
lack the support required by women with young children and
other care-taking responsibilities, which forces them to vacate
STEM positions at greater rates than men [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">55</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Other posts noted that starting a family would result in missed
opportunities and chances to be promoted. Their managers
suggested they take jobs with less responsibility and no travel, so
they can be ready for family life. This disparity was discussed by
Hewlett [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>
        ]. After conducting a survey to explore the
professional and private lives of highly educated, high-earning
professionals, she found that 49 percent of those women were childless
compared to only 19 percent of men. Furthermore, she discusses
the wage gap and its connection to the penalties women tend to
face when they interrupt their careers to have children. Recent
studies have confirmed that an increasingly large part of the wage
gap can now be explained by childbearing as this is something
that interrupts a woman’s career, but not a man’s [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24 ref6">6, 24</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Equality: Our results indicate that some women were treated
unequally by their classmates, coworkers, faculty, and managers.
Diferences in terms of career advice, kind of work assigned,
wage, and promotion, have been noted. Past studies found
similar instances of inequality. Researchers found that male faculty
were more likely to ignore emails from prospective female
graduate students than males [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">35</xref>
        ]. Analysis of 1,224 recommendation
letters for graduate studies in geo-science revealed that female
applicants were half as likely to receive excellent versus good
letters compared to male applicants. Male and female
recommenders were equally likely to display this bias [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>
        ]. In STEM
workplaces, women’s success in STEM was attributed to luck as
opposed to skill [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">56</xref>
        ]. Other studies conclude that men have a
higher chance of being promoted and receive higher increases in
wage throughout their careers [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20 ref29">20, 29</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Personal: Our results indicate that women feel pressured
to change themselves to fit in with their male colleagues and
peers. This includes providing advice on clothing that would
allow women to be taken seriously, and avoiding unwelcome
harassment or interactions. Past studies support this finding
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42 ref56">42, 56</xref>
        ]. Some women have noted that they were forced to change
themselves in some way to meet the culture in their workplace
or in an academic setting. This includes avoiding reporting their
harassers out of worry of further implications or consequences.
From a young age, women have noted the diferences in treatment
and general gender disparities. For some, STEM careers were not
promoted to them due to their gender. In other cases, those who
decided to pursue their aspirations were anomalies who then
encountered various issues in school and in the workplace. Past
studies note similar instances of implicit and explicit sexism in
both STEM academics and workplaces [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18 ref48">18, 48</xref>
        ].
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-11">
      <title>5 CONCLUSIONS</title>
      <p>In our analysis of the subreddits r/womenEngineers and r/xxSTEM,
we have found that there is valuable information being discussed
by women at various points in their STEM careers. Beginning at
an academic level and proceeding into their professional career,
women have noted diferent reasons for dissatisfaction and
attrition. A trend that we were not expecting to see was the many
discussions of beginning a family while also being a woman in
engineering. Unequal treatment from male coworkers as well as
employers not having a maternity or paternity policy in place
have also placed a strain on women.</p>
      <p>These findings motivate the need for policies to efectively
support working mothers and allow them to succeed in their
career without dealing with a glass ceiling mentality and
sacriifcing the want for a family to advance professionally. This issue
combines both the lack of equality in the workforce and the lack
of representation. Women are commonly faced with the decision
between their career and a family and are therefore unable to
move up the corporate ladder. They cannot situate themselves
in a position where they are able to become mentors and role
models for the upcoming generation of engineers.</p>
      <p>It is important to continue to examine the experiences of
women in engineering in a forum in which they can speak freely.
In future work, we will carry out a similar text mining study on
other social media platforms such as Twitter or Facebook.
Furthermore, comments on platforms such as Glassdoor or LinkedIn
can provide unique insight into specific employers and industries.
Finally, as we mentioned earlier, comments on social media
platforms have a tendency to be negative. An interesting direction
for future work is to analyze positive discussions that
specifically point out programs and initiatives to improve women’s
satisfaction and persistence in STEM.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Catherine</surname>
            <given-names>T</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Amelink</surname>
          </string-name>
          and Elizabeth G Creamer.
          <year>2010</year>
          .
          <article-title>Gender diferences in elements of the undergraduate experience that influence satisfaction with the engineering major and the intent to pursue engineering as a career</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Engineering Education</source>
          <volume>99</volume>
          ,
          <issue>1</issue>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          ),
          <fpage>81</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>92</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cornelia</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ashby</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2006</year>
          . Higher Education: Science, Technology, Engineering, and
          <article-title>Mathematics Trends and the Role of Federal Programs</article-title>
          .
          <article-title>Testimony before the Committee on Education and the Workforce</article-title>
          ,
          <source>House of Representatives. GAO-06-702T. Government Accountability Ofice</source>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Christos</given-names>
            <surname>Baziotis</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Nikos Pelekis, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Christos</given-names>
            <surname>Doulkeridis</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <article-title>Datastories at semeval-2017 task 4: Deep lstm with attention for message-level and topicbased sentiment analysis</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2017)</source>
          .
          <fpage>747</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>754</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Rae</given-names>
            <surname>Lesser Blumberg</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2007</year>
          .
          <article-title>Gender bias in textbooks: A hidden obstacle on the road to gender equality in education</article-title>
          . Unesco Paris.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stephen</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brush</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Women in Science and Engineering</article-title>
          .
          <source>American Scientist</source>
          <volume>79</volume>
          ,
          <issue>5</issue>
          (Oct.
          <year>2016</year>
          ),
          <fpage>404</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>419</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Michelle</surname>
            <given-names>J Budig</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Paula</given-names>
            <surname>England</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al.
          <year>2001</year>
          .
          <article-title>The wage penalty for motherhood</article-title>
          .
          <source>American sociological review 66</source>
          ,
          <issue>2</issue>
          (
          <year>2001</year>
          ),
          <fpage>204</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>225</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Beil K. Dam N. Yassinskaya M. Shaw C. Mavriplis</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Heller</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Sorensen</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2010</year>
          .
          <article-title>Mind the Gap: Women in STEM Career Breaks</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Technology Management and Innovation</source>
          <volume>5</volume>
          ,
          <issue>1</issue>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Engineers</given-names>
            <surname>Canada</surname>
          </string-name>
          . [n.d.]. Retention | Engineers Canada. https:// engineerscanada.ca/diversity/women-in-engineering/retention
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Molly</given-names>
            <surname>Carnes</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Patricia G Devine,
          <article-title>Carol Isaac</article-title>
          , Linda Baier Manwell, Cecelia E Ford,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Angela</surname>
            Byars-Winston,
            <given-names>Eve</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fine</surname>
            , and
            <given-names>Jennifer</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sheridan</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2012</year>
          .
          <article-title>Promoting institutional change through bias literacy</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Diversity in Higher Education</source>
          <volume>5</volume>
          ,
          <issue>2</issue>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          ),
          <fpage>63</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Sapna</given-names>
            <surname>Cheryan and Victoria C Plaut</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2010</year>
          .
          <article-title>Explaining underrepresentation: A theory of precluded interest</article-title>
          .
          <source>Sex roles 63</source>
          ,
          <fpage>7</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>8</lpage>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          ),
          <fpage>475</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>488</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shivangi</surname>
            <given-names>Chopra</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Hannah Gautreau, Abeer Khan, Melicaalsadat Mirsafian, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Lukasz</given-names>
            <surname>Golab</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2018</year>
          .
          <article-title>Gender Diferences in Undergraduate Engineering Applicants: A Text Mining Approach</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, EDM</source>
          <year>2018</year>
          ,
          <article-title>Bufalo</article-title>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>NY</surname>
          </string-name>
          , USA, July
          <volume>15</volume>
          -
          <issue>18</issue>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          .
          <fpage>44</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>54</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shivangi</surname>
            <given-names>Chopra</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Abeer Khan, Melicaalsadat Mirsafian, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Lukasz</given-names>
            <surname>Golab</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2019</year>
          .
          <article-title>Gender Diferences in Science and Engineering: A Data Mining Approach</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the Workshops of the EDBT/ICDT 2019 Joint Conference</source>
          , EDBT/ICDT 2019, Lisbon, Portugal, March
          <volume>26</volume>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          . http://ceur-ws.
          <source>org/</source>
          Vol-2322/DARLIAP_7.pdf
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shivangi</surname>
            <given-names>Chopra</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Abeer Khan, Melicaalsadat Mirsafian, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Lukasz</given-names>
            <surname>Golab</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2019</year>
          .
          <article-title>Gender Diferences in Work-Integrated Learning Assessments</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, EDM</source>
          <year>2019</year>
          , Montréal, Canada,
          <source>July 2-5</source>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          . https://drive.google.com/file/d/ 1W78yWFprzoQmazdrO1JArD6zZ8FhJt3F
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jennifer</surname>
            <given-names>Crocker</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Andrew Karpinski,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Diane M Quinn</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <article-title>Sara</article-title>
          K Chase.
          <year>2003</year>
          .
          <article-title>When grades determine self-worth: consequences of contingent self-worth for male and female engineering and psychology majors</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of personality and social psychology 85</source>
          ,
          <issue>3</issue>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          ),
          <fpage>507</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Munmun De Choudhury and Sushovan De</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2014</year>
          .
          <article-title>Mental health discourse on reddit: Self-disclosure, social support, and anonymity</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>ICWSM</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2014</year>
          ,
          <volume>71</volume>
          -
          <fpage>80</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Munmun De Choudhury</surname>
            , Shagun Jhaver, Benjamin Sugar, and
            <given-names>Ingmar</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Weber</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Social Media Participation in an Activist Movement for Racial Equality</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proceedings of the 10th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media</source>
          <year>2016</year>
          ,
          <fpage>92</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>101</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Eric</surname>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Deemer</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Dustin B Thoman, Justin P Chase, and Jessi L Smith.
          <year>2014</year>
          .
          <article-title>Feeling the threat: Stereotype threat as a contextual barrier to women's science career choice intentions</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Career Development</source>
          <volume>41</volume>
          ,
          <issue>2</issue>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          ),
          <fpage>141</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>158</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alessandra</surname>
            <given-names>Jayne</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dinin</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <article-title>An Exploration in Theory of the Storied Experiences of Women Earning Engineering Bachelor's Degrees at a Southern, Research, Predominately White Institution</article-title>
          .
          <source>ProQuest LLC</source>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          [19]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kuheli</surname>
            <given-names>Dutt</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Danielle L Pfaf,
          <article-title>Ariel F Bernstein, Joseph S Dillard,</article-title>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Caryn</surname>
          </string-name>
          J Block.
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Gender diferences in recommendation letters for postdoctoral fellowships in geoscience</article-title>
          .
          <source>Nature Geoscience</source>
          <volume>9</volume>
          ,
          <issue>11</issue>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          ),
          <fpage>805</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          [20]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kimberly</surname>
            <given-names>A Eddleston</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , David C Baldridge, and John F Veiga.
          <year>2004</year>
          .
          <article-title>Toward modeling the predictors of managerial career success: does gender matter</article-title>
          ?
          <source>Journal of Managerial Psychology</source>
          <volume>19</volume>
          ,
          <issue>4</issue>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          ),
          <fpage>360</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>385</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          [21]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Richard</surname>
            <given-names>M Felder</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gary N Felder</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Meredith Mauney,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Charles E Hamrin</given-names>
            <surname>Jr</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E Jacquelin</given-names>
            <surname>Dietz</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>1995</year>
          .
          <article-title>A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention</article-title>
          . III.
          <article-title>Gender diferences in student performance and attitudes</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Engineering Education</source>
          <volume>84</volume>
          ,
          <issue>2</issue>
          (
          <year>1995</year>
          ),
          <fpage>151</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>163</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          [22]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kimberley</surname>
            <given-names>Ferriman</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , David Lubinski, and Camilla P Benbow.
          <year>2009</year>
          .
          <article-title>Work preferences, life values, and personal views of top math/science graduate students and the profoundly gifted: Developmental changes and gender diferences during emerging adulthood and parenthood</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of personality and social psychology 97</source>
          ,
          <issue>3</issue>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ),
          <fpage>517</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation>
          [23]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Darcy</given-names>
            <surname>Hango</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2013</year>
          .
          <article-title>Gender Diferences in science</article-title>
          , technology, engineering, mathematics, and computer science (STEM) programs at university.
          <source>Insights on Canadian Society (12</source>
          <year>2013</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation>
          [24]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Susan</given-names>
            <surname>Harkness</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Jane</given-names>
            <surname>Waldfogel</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2003</year>
          .
          <article-title>The family gap in pay: Evidence from seven industrialized countries. In Worker well-being and public policy</article-title>
          . Emerald Group Publishing Limited,
          <fpage>369</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>413</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <mixed-citation>
          [25]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Hewlett</surname>
          </string-name>
          . [n.d.].
          <article-title>Executive Women and the Myth of Having It All</article-title>
          . https: //hbr.org/
          <year>2002</year>
          /04/executive
          <article-title>-women-and-the-myth-of-having-it-all.</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref26">
        <mixed-citation>
          [26]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Christopher</surname>
            <given-names>Homan</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Ravdeep Johar, Tong Liu, Megan Lytle, Vincent Silenzio, and Cecilia Ovesdotter Alm.
          <year>2014</year>
          .
          <article-title>Toward macro-insights for suicide prevention: Analyzing fine-grained distress at scale</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: From Linguistic Signal to Clinical Reality</source>
          .
          <fpage>107</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>117</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref27">
        <mixed-citation>
          [27]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Jennifer</given-names>
            <surname>Hunt</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Why do women leave science and engineering?</article-title>
          <source>ILR Review 69</source>
          ,
          <issue>1</issue>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          ),
          <fpage>199</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>226</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref28">
        <mixed-citation>
          [28]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Aditya</surname>
            <given-names>Johri</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Habib Karbasian, Aqdas Malik, Rajat Handa, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Hemant</given-names>
            <surname>Purohit</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2018</year>
          .
          <article-title>How diverse users and activities trigger connective action via social media: lessons from the twitter hashtag campaign# ilooklikeanengineer</article-title>
          . arXiv preprint arXiv:
          <year>1804</year>
          .
          <volume>09226</volume>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref29">
        <mixed-citation>
          [29]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Antti</given-names>
            <surname>Kauhanen</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Sami</given-names>
            <surname>Napari</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2011</year>
          .
          <article-title>Gender diferences in careers</article-title>
          .
          <source>Technical Report. ETLA discussion paper.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref30">
        <mixed-citation>
          [30]
          <string-name>
            <surname>H.Liu L. Manikonda</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Beigi</surname>
            and
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kambhampati</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2018</year>
          .
          <article-title>Twitter for Sparking a Movement, Reddit for Sharing the Moment: metoo through the Lens of Social Media</article-title>
          .
          <source>Technical Report</source>
          . Arizona State University.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref31">
        <mixed-citation>
          [31]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Michael</given-names>
            <surname>Thaul</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lehrman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Cecilia Ovesdotter Alm, and Rubén A Proano</source>
          .
          <year>2012</year>
          .
          <article-title>Detecting distressed and non-distressed afect states in short forum texts</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Language in Social Media. Association for Computational Linguistics</source>
          ,
          <fpage>9</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>18</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref32">
        <mixed-citation>
          [32]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Judith</surname>
            <given-names>Lorber</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Susan A Farrell</source>
          , et al.
          <year>1991</year>
          .
          <article-title>The social construction of gender</article-title>
          . Sage Newbury Park, CA.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref33">
        <mixed-citation>
          [33]
          <string-name>
            <surname>L. Subich M. Cadaret</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hartung</surname>
            and
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Weigold</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <article-title>Stereotype threat as a barrier to women entering engineering careers</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Vocational Behavior</source>
          <volume>99</volume>
          ,
          <issue>1</issue>
          (Oct.
          <year>2017</year>
          ),
          <fpage>40</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>51</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref34">
        <mixed-citation>
          [34]
          <string-name>
            <surname>David</surname>
            <given-names>MacPhee</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Samantha Farro, and Silvia Sara Canetto.
          <year>2013</year>
          .
          <article-title>Academic self-eficacy and performance of underrepresented STEM majors: Gender, ethnic, and social class patterns</article-title>
          .
          <source>Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy</source>
          <volume>13</volume>
          ,
          <issue>1</issue>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          ),
          <fpage>347</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>369</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref35">
        <mixed-citation>
          [35]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Katherine</surname>
            <given-names>L Milkman</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Modupe Akinola</surname>
            , and
            <given-names>Dolly</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chugh</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <article-title>What happens before? A field experiment exploring how pay and representation diferentially shape bias on the pathway into organizations</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Applied Psychology</source>
          <volume>100</volume>
          ,
          <issue>6</issue>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          ),
          <fpage>1678</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref36">
        <mixed-citation>
          [36]
          <string-name>
            <surname>K. Cappaert W. Chang N. Fouad</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Singh</surname>
            and
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wan</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Comparison of women engineers who persist in or depart from engineering</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Vocational Behavior</source>
          <volume>92</volume>
          ,
          <issue>1</issue>
          (Oct.
          <year>2016</year>
          ),
          <fpage>79</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>93</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref37">
        <mixed-citation>
          [37]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Rebecca</given-names>
            <surname>Northfield</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2018</year>
          . Female engineers#
          <source>MeToo? Engineering &amp; Technology</source>
          <volume>13</volume>
          ,
          <issue>6</issue>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          ),
          <fpage>32</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>36</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref38">
        <mixed-citation>
          [38]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Derek O'callaghan</surname>
            , Derek Greene, Joe Carthy, and
            <given-names>Pádraig</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cunningham</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <article-title>An analysis of the coherence of descriptors in topic modeling</article-title>
          .
          <source>Expert Systems with Applications</source>
          <volume>42</volume>
          ,
          <issue>13</issue>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          ),
          <fpage>5645</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>5657</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref39">
        <mixed-citation>
          [39]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Frank</given-names>
            <surname>Pajares</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2005</year>
          .
          <article-title>Gender diferences in mathematics self-eficacy beliefs</article-title>
          .
          <source>Gender diferences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach</source>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          ),
          <fpage>294</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>315</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref40">
        <mixed-citation>
          [40]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V Paul</given-names>
            <surname>Pauca</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Farial Shahnaz, Michael W Berry, and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Robert</surname>
          </string-name>
          J Plemmons.
          <year>2004</year>
          .
          <article-title>Text mining using non-negative matrix factorizations</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 2004 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. SIAM</source>
          ,
          <fpage>452</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>456</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref41">
        <mixed-citation>
          [41]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Umashanthi</given-names>
            <surname>Pavalanathan and Munmun De Choudhury</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <article-title>Identity management and mental health discourse in social media</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM</source>
          ,
          <volume>315</volume>
          -
          <fpage>321</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref42">
        <mixed-citation>
          [42]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Abigail</surname>
            <given-names>Powell</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Barbara Bagilhole, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Andrew</given-names>
            <surname>Dainty</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2009</year>
          .
          <article-title>How women engineers do and undo gender: Consequences for gender equality</article-title>
          .
          <source>Gender, work &amp; organization 16</source>
          ,
          <issue>4</issue>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ),
          <fpage>411</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>428</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref43">
        <mixed-citation>
          [43]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B. Chakalov S.</given-names>
            <surname>Modrek</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2019</year>
          .
          <article-title>The MeToo Movement in the United States: Text Analysis of Early Twitter Conversations</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Medical Internet Research</source>
          <volume>21</volume>
          ,
          <issue>9</issue>
          (Sept.
          <year>2019</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.2196/13837
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref44">
        <mixed-citation>
          [44]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Linda</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sax</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>1994</year>
          .
          <article-title>Mathematical self-concept: How college reinforces the gender gap</article-title>
          .
          <source>Research in Higher Education</source>
          <volume>35</volume>
          ,
          <issue>2</issue>
          (
          <year>1994</year>
          ),
          <fpage>141</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>166</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref45">
        <mixed-citation>
          [45]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Linda</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sax</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>1994</year>
          .
          <article-title>Predicting gender and major-field diferences in mathematical self-concept during college</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 1</source>
          ,
          <issue>4</issue>
          (
          <year>1994</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref46">
        <mixed-citation>
          [46]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nicolas</surname>
            <given-names>Schrading</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Cecilia Ovesdotter Alm, Raymond Ptucha, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Christopher</given-names>
            <surname>Homan</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <article-title># whyistayed,# whyileft: Microblogging to make sense of domestic abuse</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies</source>
          .
          <fpage>1281</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1286</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref47">
        <mixed-citation>
          [47]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nicolas</surname>
            <given-names>Schrading</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Cecilia Ovesdotter Alm, Ray Ptucha, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Christopher</given-names>
            <surname>Homan</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <article-title>An analysis of domestic abuse discourse on Reddit</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing</source>
          .
          <fpage>2577</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2583</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref48">
        <mixed-citation>
          [48]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Carroll</surname>
            <given-names>Seron</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Susan S Silbey, Erin Cech, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Brian</given-names>
            <surname>Rubineau</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Persistence is cultural: Professional socialization and the reproduction of sex segregation</article-title>
          .
          <source>Work and Occupations</source>
          <volume>43</volume>
          ,
          <issue>2</issue>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          ),
          <fpage>178</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>214</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref49">
        <mixed-citation>
          [49]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Adrienne</surname>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Smith</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2012</year>
          .
          <article-title>They chose to major in engineering: A study of why women enter and persist in undergraduate engineering programs</article-title>
          .
          <source>Ph.D. Dissertation</source>
          . University of Massachusetts - Amherst.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref50">
        <mixed-citation>
          [50]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jennifer</surname>
            <given-names>Steele</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Jacquelyn B James, and Rosalind Chait Barnett.
          <year>2002</year>
          .
          <article-title>Learning in a Man's world: Examining the perceptions of undergraduate women in Male-Dominated academic areas</article-title>
          .
          <source>Psychology of women quarterly 26</source>
          ,
          <issue>1</issue>
          (
          <year>2002</year>
          ),
          <fpage>46</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>50</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref51">
        <mixed-citation>
          [51]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>IPEDS</given-names>
            <surname>Completion</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Survey</article-title>
          . [n.d.]. American Physical Society. https://www. aps.org/programs/education/statistics/womenmajors.cfm.
          <source>Accessed: 20th August</source>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref52">
        <mixed-citation>
          [52]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Divy</surname>
            <given-names>Thakkar</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Nithya Sambasivan, Purva Kulkarni, Pratap Kalenahalli Sudarshan, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Kentaro</given-names>
            <surname>Toyama</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2018</year>
          .
          <article-title>The Unexpected Entry and Exodus of Women in Computing and HCI in India</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM</source>
          ,
          <volume>352</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref53">
        <mixed-citation>
          [53]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Joachim</given-names>
            <surname>Tiedemann</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2000</year>
          .
          <article-title>Parents' gender stereotypes and teachers' beliefs as predictors of children's concept of their mathematical ability in elementary school</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Educational psychology 92</source>
          ,
          <issue>1</issue>
          (
          <year>2000</year>
          ),
          <fpage>144</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref54">
        <mixed-citation>
          [54]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Joseph</surname>
            <given-names>B</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Walther</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>1996</year>
          .
          <article-title>Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction</article-title>
          .
          <source>Communication research 23</source>
          ,
          <issue>1</issue>
          (
          <year>1996</year>
          ),
          <fpage>3</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>43</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref55">
        <mixed-citation>
          [55]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ming-Te Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jessica L. Degol</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2017</year>
          . Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mathematics</surname>
          </string-name>
          (STEM):
          <article-title>Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions</article-title>
          .
          <source>Educational Psychology Review</source>
          <volume>29</volume>
          ,
          <issue>1</issue>
          (
          <issue>01</issue>
          <year>Mar 2017</year>
          ),
          <fpage>119</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>140</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref56">
        <mixed-citation>
          [56]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Joan</given-names>
            <surname>Williams</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Katherine</given-names>
            <surname>Phillips</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Erika</given-names>
            <surname>Hall</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2014</year>
          .
          <article-title>Double Jeopardy? Gender Bias Against Women of Color in Science. Published online at www</article-title>
          .worklifelaw.org. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1763.8723
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref57">
        <mixed-citation>
          [57]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shelly L Wismath and Maggie Zhong</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2014</year>
          . Gender Diferences In University Students'
          <article-title>Perceptions Of And Confidence In Problem-Solving Abilities</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering</source>
          <volume>20</volume>
          ,
          <issue>1</issue>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref58">
        <mixed-citation>
          [58]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jun-Ming</surname>
            <given-names>Xu</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Benjamin Burchfiel, Xiaojin Zhu, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Amy</given-names>
            <surname>Bellmore</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2013</year>
          .
          <article-title>An examination of regret in bullying tweets</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies</source>
          .
          <fpage>697</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>702</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>