=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-2586/paper7
|storemode=property
|title=Introduction of Actor-Focused Digital Building Blocks into Enterprise Architectures of Hospitals (short paper)
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2586/paper7.pdf
|volume=Vol-2586
|authors=Johannes Wichmann
|dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/ifip8-1/Wichmann19
}}
==Introduction of Actor-Focused Digital Building Blocks into Enterprise Architectures of Hospitals (short paper)==
https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2586/paper7.pdf
Introduction of Actor-Focused Digital Building Blocks
into Enterprise Architectures of Hospitals
Johannes Wichmann
University of Rostock
Institute of Computer Science
Business Informatics
Albert-Einstein-Str. 22, 18059 Rostock, Germany
johannes.wichmann@uni-rostock.de
Abstract. As the digitalization progresses, enterprises, such as hospitals, are in
need to utilize the advantages for their performances. Given that the sector is one
of the lesser digitalized, this research seeks to define a reference architecture as
an artifact, which enables experts to seamlessly implement, adapt or remove dig-
ital building blocks (e.g. systems or applications) in enterprise architectures of
hospitals. Therefore, a systematic literature review about the current digitaliza-
tion approaches as an overview for the determination of the status quo is neces-
sary. Afterwards, objectives for the artifact will be designed that include needs
of the physical actors within a hospital. To verify the artifact, a demonstration
will be conducted, as a digital building block will be implemented, adapted or
removed. In connection, the demonstration will be evaluated and the results com-
municated to the community within the sector as well as the scientific community
interested in enterprise architecture management.
Keywords: Enterprise Architecture Management, EAM, Digital Transfor-
mation, Digital Building Block, Actor-Based Enterprise Modeling
1 Introduction
In times of the ongoing digitalization, enterprises face challenges in terms of flexibili-
zation and consequently new phenomena emerge continuously, e.g. methods for pro-
cess improvement or decision models for working activities. One approved method to
handle these challenges and to structure digitalization efforts is the Enterprise Archi-
tecture Management, as it provides “methods and tools to establish a more holistic per-
spective on enterprises which includes systematically capturing and developing the dif-
ferent architectural layer of an enterprise (e.g. business, application and technology ar-
chitecture)” [18]. However, especially the healthcare sector still lacks digitalization ef-
forts [4, 5]. According to digitization indexes, such as the McKinsey Global Institute
industry digitization index [23] or the DIGITAL Economy Monitoring Report [24], the
healthcare branch is one of the least digitized. In terms of the digital usage that is spe-
cifically relevant for this research and contains transactions, customer and supplier in-
teractions as well as internal business processes, only the construction as well as the
Copyright © 2020 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under
Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
2
agriculture & hunting branch perform worse [23]. Thus, the healthcare sector is in need
of smart and appropriate services to improve the digital usage, whereas Enterprise Ar-
chitecture Management is a suitable concept for the development [1, 2]. In connection,
cost-related and time-consuming activities to improve the digitalization efforts are the
most critical barriers that inhibit digitalization [6]. The improvement of customer com-
munication using digital channels, the enhancement in the quality of services or the
range of services and the reduction of costs through the digitalization of internal pro-
cesses, workflows and resources could provide huge advantages for the sector’s enter-
prises [6]. In connection to the aforementioned most critical barriers, it is necessary to
design an initiative plan for the implementation, adaption and removal of digital entities
that integrates all relevant stakeholders, as this approach is considered to be the most
promising one [21, 22]. To further define the digital entities, the term digital building
block is used, as it helps teams to deliver services faster and to comply with regulation.
Digital building blocks offer well-defined capabilities that can be used in digitalization
of internal operations and delivery of patient-oriented services in hospitals. They en-
compass organizational, technical and economic aspects adaptable to individual hospi-
tals. Furthermore, some of the basic capabilities of those blocks can be reused in any
other project to facilitate the delivery of digital services across the stakeholders [12].
Therefore, this research investigates a possible solution for managing the digitalization
in hospitals by designing a reference architecture that is dedicated to seamlessly imple-
ment, adapt or remove digital building blocks as the assumption is that such a reference
architecture could gain the aforementioned advantages for a hospital. Furthermore, this
research should answer the main research question:
RQ: How could a hospital benefit from a reference architecture that is dedicated to
seamlessly implement, adapt or remove digital building blocks?
2 Problem Investigation & Research Progress
This section provides a detailed explanation of the individual steps of the research
as well as the definition of sub research questions that are necessary to answer the main
research question. As the first step of the research, an overview about the current ap-
proaches for digitalization in hospitals and their repercussions on the respective enter-
prise architectures is necessary. Furthermore, limitations are important and have to be
documented as they could function as provider for ideas. Consequently, the first sub
research question is:
S-RQ1: What is the current state of the art concerning enterprise architecture modeling
in hospitals and what are the main difficulties to be resolved by implementing
new digital building blocks?
The S-RQ1 seeks to define the research problem and to justify the value of a solution.
The problem shall be atomized to gain information and to determine if the problem is
of special or general interest. The latter is necessary, so that the reader is able to validate
3
the research’s finding, to accept the results and to understand the reasoning, which is
associated with the researcher’s understanding of the problem [3]. To realize this pur-
pose, a systematic literature review shall be conducted.
As the second activity, the research’s scope has to be sharpened. Since several stake-
holders in terms of digitalization of hospitals exist, the first step is to predefine the
target group for the research. Whereas the definition of internal and external stakehold-
ers in hospitals depends on certain views, such as the key output [10], the research
would become too complex by considering external stakeholders, as they vary from
country to country, e.g. the Medicaid [8] program in the USA or the Medical Advisory
Service of the German Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds [9] in Ger-
many. Since it is possible that patients are determined as external stakeholders due to
that fact that they do not operate in hospitals and by contrast are the necessity that a
hospital can function [11], this research intends to investigate the physical actors within
a hospital, which includes the patient as an internal stakeholder. Thereby, different and
very important needs emerge, as it is conceivable that the alteration of a digital building
block could affect several actors in a hospital, regardless of whether they operate in a
hospital (e.g. physicians, nurses) or not (patients, relatives). Therefore, a determination
of the actor group is essential, which leads to the second sub research question that is
divided in three parts each concerning one of the aforementioned aspects:
S-RQ2.1: Who are the physical actors in a hospital?
S-RQ2.2: What are their needs?
S-RQ2.3: How do they interact with the corresponding enterprise architecture and the
digital building block(s)?
By answering those questions, the objectives for the solution shall be gathered and
determined, by what is possible and feasible. As a new artifact shall be developed that
is a desirable solution, which is better than the current one, there should be qualitative
and quantitative goals. Additionally, the solution should fulfill the actors’ needs [3]. To
assure that, the necessities have to be ascertained, which could be realized by the Digital
Innovation and Transformation Process [13]. This process is particularly well-suited
for the present research as it supports the digital architect to moderate modeling ses-
sions, regardless of the level of knowledge the local experts in the hospital exhibit con-
cerning enterprise architecture modeling.
The first phase of this process is called Focus Your Intention as presented in figure
1. It is dedicated to collect information about the actors’ needs as it asks for: What has
to be digitalized?, How does it have to be realized?, Who is involved? and What is the
value of the solution? [13].
4
Fig. 1. The Digital Innovation and Transformation Process by Wißotzki et al. [13]
Consequently, those information as well as the information gathered by S-RQ1 and
the qualitative and quantitative goals lead to the third phase of the research – the crea-
tion of the artifact. Typically, such artifacts are models, methods, constructs or instan-
tiations [3]. For this research, a reference architecture is envisaged that satisfies the
actors’ needs and enables IT specialists within the hospitals to implement, adapt or
remove digital building blocks in the respective enterprise architecture with seamlessly
conditions. Therefore, the third sub research question reads as follows:
S-RQ3: How is it possible to seamlessly implement, adapt or remove digital building
blocks into the enterprise architecture of hospitals?
The next step of the research requires the demonstration of the developed artifact.
This could be an experiment, simulation, case study, proof of concept or other appro-
priate activities [3]. By now, a conceivable case study could be the implementation of
sensor-based indoor positioning [14] into the enterprise architecture of a hospital, as
called the CliNav project. It would provide a digital mobility solution to navigate people
through the hospital buildings to their destinations. Therefore, CliNav transforms loud-
speakers into indoor GPS satellites. The project explores a web-based positioning so-
lution on non-audible ultrasonic tones so that the clinic’s website can navigate every
webpage visitor to the desired space. Concerning this research, the actors’ needs for
indoor positioning are interesting and have to be ascertained as well as investigated in
terms of potential outcomes concerning the reference architecture. Additionally, data
from other use cases already exist [15] and could lead to further improvements by com-
parison. Further, the outcomes regarding the enterprise architecture of the hospital (e.g.
5
advantages, risks, complications, procedure of integration) will be captured and evalu-
ated in order to improve the intended reference architecture, which leads to the fourth
sub research question:
S-RQ4: How could the artifact be further developed to better fulfill the existing or new-
emerged needs of the actors?
To gain the information needed, several approaches are conceivable and the selec-
tion will depend on the progress of the case study. A possible attempt could be the
comparison between the situations before and after conducting the case study. For ex-
ample, error-proneness’s regarding the hospital’s architecture as well as time savings
or expenditures due to the navigation system could be measured. Furthermore, satisfac-
tion surveys, client feedback or simulations are possible [3].
As the sixth and last step of the research, the overall process, which includes the
problem and its importance to handle it, the artifact including its utility and novelty
(and possible improvements) as well as its effectiveness to researchers and other audi-
ences will be communicated [3]. Concerning this research process, the summarizing
communication should be a publication, which comprises the whole research work and
is the doctoral thesis.
3 Methodology
As the methodology for this research, the design science approach by Peffers et al. [3]
is used. It provides the following six steps to carry out the research process:
1. Prolem identification and motivation,
2. Define the objectives for a solution,
3. Design and development,
4. Demonstration,
5. Evaluation and
6. Communication.
These six steps are presented below in figure 2 and adapted to this research. Addi-
tionally, several factors [20] influence the process steps. First, the column research
methods describes the approaches that are relevant for the progress. Second, the col-
umns below the research methods describe the data collection and data analysis and
respectively the tools applied. Third, on the bottom of the figure, are the databases rel-
evant for the research. They are separated in knowledge base (light green), e.g. research
publications within the area and environment (dark green) with data derived from use
cases, e.g. information from expert interviews.
6
Fig. 2. Adapted Design Science Research Methodology by Peffers et al. [3] and Wißotzki [20]
4 Preliminary Results & Outlook
In relation to the first step of this research, possibilities and interests in terms of indoor
location-based services were gathered. Qualitative interviews with domain experts in
several sectors were conducted [15] to determine, if those services trigger a general
interest and if they could be implemented in several branches. Additionally, the Digital
Innovation and Transformation Process has to be verified, improved and tested con-
cerning the suitability in hospitals. Therefore, implementations in different contexts
took place, such as zoo gardening facilities [17]. By considering the S-RQ1, a system-
atic literature review has been conducted [7, 16]. SpringerLink, AISeL, IEEE and Sco-
pus have been selected as the relevant databases and it was ascertained, that efforts
concerning digitalization and new approaches for enterprise architecture management
exists and that the number of researches within the area is rising (figure 3). In order to
gain a holistic view, the outcomes of the systematic literature review were categorized
in sub-groups by a similarity approach according to Palinkas et al. [19]. As the most
important topics, the 405 relevant were sorted as:
1. Clinical Process Management, including Lean Management (132 paper),
2. Business or Enterprise Architecture Management (69),
3. Platform Development & Management (40),
4. Process Mining, including Data Management (38),
7
5. Decision Management (35),
6. Conformance Management (16),
7. Simulation Management (16),
8. Quality Management (9),
9. Knowledge Management (8) and
10. Petri Net Models (6) [16].
Fig. 3. Trend and Number of digitalization-relevant Paper concerning hospitals per Year [16].
The next steps of the research process will be to determine actor-based digital build-
ing blocks in hospitals and the respective state of research as well as to prepare quali-
tative studies in terms of expert interviews. Therefore, research questions have to be
considered that trigger the actors’ needs for the artifact.
Acknowledgements
The research is supervised by Kurt Sandkuhl (Chair of Business Informatics) and Mi-
chael Leyer (Business Administration of Services) at the University of Rostock as well
as by Matthias Wißotzki (Business Informatics / Business Models) at the Wismar Uni-
versity of Applied Sciences.
References
1. Haghighathoseini, A. Bobarshad, H. Saghafi et al.: Hospital enterprise Architecture Frame-
work (Study of Iranian University Hospital Organization). International journal of medical
informatics 114, 88-100 (2018).
8
2. Handayani, P. W., Pinem, A. A., Munajat, Q. et al.: Health Referral Enterprise Architecture
in Indonesia. Health Informatics Research 25(1), 3-11 (2019).
3. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A. et al.: A Design Science Methodology for
Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24(3), 45-78
(2007).
4. German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy: Monitoring-Report DIGITAL
Economy 2017. https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/EN/Publikationen/monitoring-report-
wirtschaft-digital-2017.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=8, last accessed 2019/07/29.
5. Gandhi, P., Khanna, S., Ramaswamy, S.: Which industries are the most digital (and why?).
https://hbr.org/2016/04/a-chart-that-shows-which-industries-are-the-most-digital-and-why,
last accessed 2019/07/29.
6. German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy: Monitoring-Report DIGITAL
Economy 2018. https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/EN/Publikationen/monitoring-report-
digital-economy-2018.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2, kast, last accessed 2019/07/29.
7. University of Rostock: Presentations at BIS 2019 / BITA Workshop.
https://www.wirtschaftsinformatik.uni-rostock.de/en/chair/chair-overview/news-in-de-
tail/n/praesentationen-auf-der-bis-2019-bita-workshop-49789/, last accessed 2019/07/29.
8. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: Medicaid – Basic Health Program.
https://www.medicaid.gov/basic-health-program/index.html, last accessed 2019/07/29.
9. Medical Advisory Service of the German Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds.
https://www.mdk.de/, last accessed 2019/07/29.
10. Pandi-Perumal, S. R., Akhter, S., Zizi, F. et al.: Project Stakeholder Management in the
Clinical Research Environment: How to Do it Right. Front Psychiatry 6:71 (2015).
11. Fottler, M. D., Blair, J. D., Whitehead, C. J. et al.: Assessing Key Stakeholders: Who Matters
to Hospitals and Why?. Hospital & Health Services Administration 34(4), 525-546 (1989).
12. European Commission: CEF Building Blocks. https://ec.europa.eu/cefdigital/wiki/dis-
play/CEFDIGITAL/Building+Blocks, last accessed 2019/07/30.
13. Wißotzki, M., Sandkuhl, K.: The Digital Business Architect – Towards Method Support for
Digital Innovation and Transformation. 10th IFP WG 8.1. Working Conference, In: Poels,
G., Gailly, F., Serral Asensio, E., Snoeck, M. (eds) The Practice of Enterprise Modeling
(POEM). pp. 352-362 (2017).
14. Koopango: https://koopango.com/en/, last accessed 2019/07/30.
15. Wißotzki, M., Schweers, P., Wichmann, J.: The Determination of Customer Location as
Human-Computer Interaction in the Retail Trade: Potentials and New Business Models. In:
Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems
(ICEIS), Vol. 2, pp. 425-432 (2019).
16. Wichmann, J., Wißotzki, M.: An Exploration of Enterprise Architecture Research in Hospi-
tals. 10th Workshop on Business and IT Alignment (BITA). In: Abramowicz, W., Corchuelo,
R.: Business Information Systems. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on
Business Information Systems (BIS), LNBIP, (2019) [tbp].
17. Wißotzki, M., Wichmann, J.: Application of the Digital Innovation and Transformation Pro-
cess in Zoo Gardening Facilities. 11th Workshop in Information Logistics and Digital Trans-
formation (ILOG). 18th International Conference on Perspectives in Business Information
Research (BIR), (2019) [pending].
18. Timm, F., Wißotzki, M., Köpp, C., Sandkuhl, K.: Current State of Enterprise Architecture
Management in SME Utilites. In: Cunningham, D., Hofstedt, P., Meer, K., Schmitt, I. (eds)
INFORMATIK, LNI, 895-907 (2015).
9
19. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A. et al.: Purposeful sampling for qualitative data
collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Pol-
icy in Mental Health and Mental Health 42(5), 533-544 (2016).
20. Wißotzki, M.: Capability Management Guide – Method Support for Enterprise Architectures
Management. Springer Vieweg. Wiesbaden (2018).
21. Russ, S. J., Sevdalis, N., Moorthy, K. et al.: A Qualitative Evaluation of the Barriers and
Facilitators Toward Implementation of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist Across Hospitals
in England. Annals of Surgery, Vol. 0, Iss. 0, pp. 1-11 (2014).
22. Alighanbari, Z., Alizadeh, A., Khorrami, F.: Barriers and strategies in Implementing Clinical
Decision Support System in Hospitals: A Case Study in Iran. Hormozgan Medical Journal,
Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 137-145 (2017).
23. Gandhi, P., Khanna, S., Ramaswamy, S.: Which Industries Are the Most Digital (and Why)?.
Harvard Business Review, Iss. April (2016). https://hbr.org/2016/04/a-chart-that-shows-
which-industries-are-the-most-digital-and-why, last accessed 2019/09/27.
24. German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. DIGITAL Economy Monitor-
ing Report 2018. https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/EN/Publikationen/monitoring-report-
digital-economy-2018.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2, last accessed 2019/09/27.