=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-2588/paper30
|storemode=property
|title=Prioritization of Security Indicators at Organization of the Life Cycle of Virtual Communities
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2588/paper30.pdf
|volume=Vol-2588
|authors=Olha Trach,Andriy Peleshchyshyn
|dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/cmigin/TrachP19
}}
==Prioritization of Security Indicators at Organization of the Life Cycle of Virtual Communities==
https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2588/paper30.pdf
Prioritization of Security Indicators at Organization of
the Life Cycle of Virtual Communities
Olha Trach[0000-0003-1461-791X] and Andriy Peleshchyshyn [0000-0002-5022-0410]
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine
olya@trach.com.ua, apele@ridne.net
Abstract. The article presents the classification and algorithms for determining
the prioritization of virtual community life cycle organization indicators. The
prioritization of indicators for the direction tasks is divided into: critical, not
critical and important. The algorithms presented are necessary for quality and
structured management of the virtual community. Also presented is the inter-
face of the program "Organization of the life cycle of virtual communities". The
application has the option of determining the priority of indicators in the direc-
tions of organization of the lifecycle of the virtual community.
Keywords: virtual community, life cycle, prioritizing, indicators
1 Introduction
Today, virtual communities have become one of the largest media platforms for meet-
ing user needs. Virtual communities are widely used in various fields, including: mass
media [1-3], science [4-6], medicine [7-10].
The virtual community survey metrics previously described in [11] are quantitative
parameters — three required to complete tasks in the lifecycle of virtual communities.
Task metrics are also used to calculate community entry into a socially-risk-averse
area [12]. Documenting and tracking the dynamics of the virtual community lifecycle
is an important security issue.
Prioritization is necessary to prevent socially-oriented risks in managing the commu-
nity and to lose control of the community, improves the timing of the steps, because it
eliminates delays in completing the tasks of the directions, and poor quality tasks are
immediately rejected.
Also, prioritizing is important for correctly identifying the tasks that need to be ad-
dressed in terms of media literacy, relevance and credibility.
Copyright © 2020 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attrib-
ution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) CMiGIN-2019: International Workshop on Conflict Management in
Global Information Networks.
2 Prioritizing of indicators of directions of organization of the
life cycle of virtual communities
For qualitative fulfillment of tasks of organization of life cycle of the virtual commu-
nity, indicators of tasks of directions of organization of life cycle of the virtual com-
munity are introduced. For fast and qualitative fulfillment of the formulated tasks in
accordance with the purpose and goals of creating a virtual community, it is necessary
to determine the priority of indicators of the tasks of organizing the lifecycle of the
virtual community. In order to prioritize indicators, the inputs and targets of the virtu-
al organization of the life cycle of virtual communities tasks are required.
Comparing the input and output indicators of the virtual community lifecycle tasks
allows you to determine the quality of the tasks performed in the previous stages and
take into account the planned performance of the virtual community lifecycle tasks
and the level of community creation.
Determining the priorities of the indicators of the organization of the lifecycle of the
virtual community are divided into (fig. 1):
Priority of indicators
Critical Non-critical Important
Fig. 1. Classification of prioritizing of indicators
Critical indicators of the tasks of the organization of the lifecycle of the virtual com-
munity. Indicators are critical to meeting the goals of organizing the lifecycle of a
virtual community. If the inequality is not met, the tasks should be rejected.
Directions are fulfilled if the following equality is fulfilled:
k iDr * k iDr (1)
0, якщоIndP IndI
(2)
k Dr
IndP IndI
, IndP IndI
i
IndP
* k Dr
where i – the permissible delta set by the virtual community lifecycle manager;
IndP – planned target of directing the lifecycle of the virtual community;
IndI – a real indicator of the task of organizing the lifecycle of the virtual communi-
ty, formed in the previous stage;
Dr Us, Inf , Rp, Rs – user, information, reputation, and resource directions of the
virtual community lifecycle, respectively.
Non-critical indicators of the tasks of directions of organization of life cycle of the
virtual community. Indicators of direction tasks are non-critical for the purpose of
directing the lifecycle of a virtual community.
Let – scattering of relative deviations of planned and real indicators of tasks of
directions of organization of life cycle of virtual community:
1/ 2
N 1
( kiDr )2
i 1 N (3)
Important indicators of the task of directing the lifecycle of the virtual. The im-
portance of an indicator of the task of organizing the lifecycle of a virtual community
indicates the criticality of individual indicators. The task will only be accomplished
using important metrics, others will be rejected. To determine the importance of the
indicator, we use the Euclidean measure of proximity.
Important indicators of the tasks of the organization of the life cycle of virtual com-
munities area are determined if its individual value exceeds the total scatter:
Ind iDr
(4)
Dr
moreover Indi is calculated by the formula:
Ind iDr ( Ind i
Dr
) 2 * wiDr
(5)
where Ind Dr 0, якщоIndP IndI ,
i
( IndP IndI ), IndP IndI
wiDr
– the weighting factor defined by the virtual community lifecycle manager,
0 wi 1 wi w w
i w
wi 1
, , ;
IndP – planned target of directing the lifecycle of the virtual community;
IndI – a real indicator of the task of organizing the lifecycle of the virtual communi-
ty, formed in the previous stage;
Dr Us, Inf , Rp, Rs – user, information, reputation, and resource directions of the virtu-
al community lifecycle, respectively.
3 Algorithms for determining the prioritizing of indicators of
the task of organization of the life cycle of virtual
communities
The algorithm for determining the critical indicators of the task of directing the
lifecycle of the virtual community is designed to determine the criticality of the indi-
cator of the task of directing the lifecycle of the virtual community and the expedien-
cy of the task.
The implementation of the Critical Indicators Algorithm for the virtual community
lifecycle assignment is the responsibility of the executor and the community manager,
who is responsible for setting the allowable delta for determining the criticality of the
indicator.
The result of performing the algorithm is to determine the criticality of the indicators
and to perform the task of organizing the lifecycle of the virtual community or reject-
ing it (fig. 2).
Beginning
Setting
objectives
IndIn iDr,
Input and planned
IndPlaniDr
performance of the
task
Updating the
Definition statement of the
Δ*kiDr,ΔkiDr task
Yes
Error analysis The success of the
ΔkiDr≤ Δ*kiDr
and correction analysis
Yes No
Implementation Rejection of the
tasks task
IndOutiDr Formation of the
output indicator
Go to the next
task
End
Fig. 2. An algorithm for determining the critical indicators of the task of life cycle organization
The algorithm for determining non-critical performance indices of the virtual com-
munity lifecycle has been developed to determine the non-critical performance indica-
tor of the virtual community lifecycle and task accomplishment.
The implementation of the algorithm for determining non-critical indicators of the
task of directing the organization of the lifecycle of the virtual community is the re-
sponsibility of the executor of the community and the manager of the community,
which is responsible for establishing a valid delta for determining the non-criticality
of the indicator.
The result of the algorithm is to determine the non-criticality of indicators and to per-
form the task of organizing the lifecycle of the virtual community (fig. 3).
Beginning
1
Setting objectives
Tasks
IndIniDr, Output
Input and
planned IndPlaniDr indicators
performance of IndOutiDr
the task Definition
ΔkiDr Go to the next
task
( kiDr )2 End
1
Fig. 3. An algorithm for determining non-critical indicators of the task of organizing the virtual
lifecycle
The algorithm for determining the importance of indicators of the task of the organi-
zation of the lifecycle of the virtual community is designed to determine the important
indicators of the task of the organization of the lifecycle of the virtual community.
The rejection of impractical indicators of the task of the organization of the lifecycle
of the virtual community and to complete the task. (fig. 4).
Beginning
1
Setting objectives
IndiDr=0
IndIniDr, Input and
planned 2
IndPlaniDr performance of
the task Tasks
Determination of
the weight factor
ωiDr Output
indicator
IndOutiDr
Definition IndN
Go to the next
task
IndiDr=
IndPlan≤IndIn Ні
IndPlan-IndIn End
Так
2
1
Fig. 4. An algorithm for determining important indicators of the task of organizing the lifecycle
of a virtual community
The implementation of the algorithm for determining important indicators of the task
of organizing the lifecycle of the virtual community is the responsibility of the execu-
tor of the community and the manager of the community, which is responsible for
establishing a valid delta determination of the non-criticality of the indicator.
The result of the algorithm is to identify important indicators, rejection of impractical
indicators and perform the task of organizing the lifecycle of the virtual community.
4 The user interface for the organization of the life cycle of
virtual communities software application
The essence of the software-algorithmic complex show on fig. 5.
WORK ON CREATING AND MANAGING A COMMUNITY
FORMATION OF A TEAM OF EXECUTORS AND
MANAGEMENT OF PERFORMERS
PRIORITIZATION OF INDICATORS
DOCUMENTATION OF THE PROCESS OF ORGANIZING THE
LIFECYCLE OF VC
Fig. 5. The essence of the software-algorithmic complex
The user interface “Organization of the life cycle of virtual communities” is devel-
oped (fig. 6).
Fig. 6. The user interface “Organization of the life cycle of virtual communities”
When you create a virtual community, the primary data will be: community name,
community information, and the virtual community's main highlight. The Virtual
Community Manager also identifies the executors of the virtual community lifecycle
organization. When defining contractors, the manager of the virtual community
lifecycle organization records the contractors, which include the primary details of the
burglars: surname and first name, position (specialty), telephone, email (fig. 7).
Fig. 7. The user interface “Organization of the life cycle of virtual communities”
Artist information is written to the virtual community lifecycle artist database.
According to the task of organizing the lifecycle of the virtual community, the man-
ager chooses the direction of organizing the lifecycle of the virtual community.
Selects the appropriate contractor, and indicators of the direction of organization of
the lifecycle of the virtual community, and determines the timing of the task and se-
lects the priority of the task of organizing the lifecycle of the virtual community (fig-
ure 8).
Fig. 8. The user interface “Organization of the life cycle of virtual communities”
The next step in the software “Organization of the life cycle of virtual communities”
is the definition of a metric that is calculated on the basis of a benchmark and a metric
based on analysis.
Important in the software “Organization of the life cycle of virtual communities”
there is also a prioritization of indicators in the implementation of the objectives of
the life cycle organization according to the algorithms developed in the section. This
feature improves the timing of the steps, eliminating delays in the execution of direc-
tion tasks, and defective tasks are immediately rejected.
All metric results are recorded in the virtual community lifecycle database. On the
basis of these data, the executors form a manager's report on the task of organizing the
lifecycle of the virtual community.
Conclusion
The complex of work associated with the project activity of the virtual community has
many features. Formalizing the lifecycle of a virtual community provides a better
approach to the processes of planning, analyzing, developing and managing a virtual
community. Measuring the prioritization of metrics allows you to manage the com-
munity in a quality way and protect your users from various threats.
Software application “Organization of the life cycle of virtual communities” assists
administrators with media literacy manage the community and adhere to media hy-
giene practices in the virtual community.
References
1. Fedushko, S., Syerov, Y., Kolos, S.: Hashtag as а Way of Archiving and Distributing Infor-
mation on the Internet. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2019. Vol. 2386: Workshop Proceed-
ings of the 8th International Conference on “Mathematics. Information Technologies. Edu-
cation 2019. P. 274–286. (2019)
2. Zakharchenko, А., Maksimtsova, Y., Iurchenko, V., Shevchenko, V., Fedushko, S.: Under
the Conditions of Non-Agenda Ownership: Social Media Users in the 2019 Ukrainian Presi-
dential Elections Campaign. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2019. Vol 2392: Proceedings of
the 1st International Workshop on Control, Optimisation and Analytical Processing of So-
cial Networks (COAPSN-2019). P. 199–219. (2019)
3. Fedushko, S., Ustyianovych, T.: Predicting Pupil’s Successfulness Factors Using Machine
Learning Algorithms and Mathematical Modelling Methods. In: Hu Z., Petoukhov S.,
Dychka I., He M. (eds) Advances in Computer Science for Engineering and Education II.
ICCSEEA 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 938. Springer, Cham.
pp 625-636. (2020)
4. Anisimova, O., Vasylenko, V., Fedushko, S.: Social Networks as a Tool for a Higher Educa-
tion Institution Image Creation. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. – 2019. Vol 2392: Proceed-
ings of the 1st International Workshop on Control, Optimisation and Analytical Processing
of Social Networks (COAPSN-2019). P. 54–65. (2019)
5. Wang, J., Yang, J., Chen, Q., Tsai, S.: Creating the sustainable conditions for knowledge
information sharing in virtual community. Springerplus, 5. 9 (2016).
6. Berezko, O., Zhezhnych, P.: Rethinking the NGO website from the knowledge management
perspective. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Scientific and Technical Conference
on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies, CSIT 2017. pp. 389-392 (2017).
7. Fedushko, S., EleonoraBenova, E.: Semantic analysis for information and communication
threats detection of online service users. The 10th International Conference on Emerging
Ubiquitous Systems and Pervasive Networks (EUSPN 2019) November 4-7, 2019, Coimbra,
Portugal. Procedia Computer Science, Volume 160, 2019, Pages 254-259. (2019)
8. Syerov, Y., Shakhovska, N., Fedushko, S.: Method of the Data Adequacy Determination of
Personal Medical Profiles. Proceedings of the International Conference of Artificial Intelli-
gence, Medical Engineering, Education (AIMEE2018). Advances in Artificial Systems for
Medicine and Education II. Volume 902, 2019. pp. 333-343. (2018)
9. Shakhovska N., Shakhovska K., Fedushko S. Some Aspects of the Method for Tourist Route
Creation. Proceedings of the International Conference of Artificial Intelligence, Medical
Engineering, Education (AIMEE2018). Advances in Artificial Systems for Medicine and
Education II. Volume 902. pp 527-537. (2019)
10. Fedushko, S., Davidekova, M.: Analytical service for processing behavioral, psychological
and communicative features in the online communication. The International Workshop on
Digitalization and Servitization within Factory-Free Economy (D&SwFFE 2019) November
4-7, 2019, Coimbra, Portugal. Procedia Computer Science. Volume 160, Pages 509-514.
(2019)
11. Trach O., Peleshchyshyn A.: Development of directions tasks indicators of virtual communi-
ty life cycle organization. Proceedings of the XIth International Scientific and Technical
Conference "Computer Sciences and Information Technologies" (CSIT-2017). Lviv, 05-08
September 2017. P. 127–130. (2017)
12. Trach, O., Fedushko, S.: Determination of Measures of Counteraction to the Social-Oriented
Risks of Virtual Community Life Cycle Organization. In: Shakhovska N., Medykovskyy M.
(eds) Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing IV. CCSIT 2019. Advances in Intelli-
gent Systems and Computing, vol 1080. Springer, Cham. pp. 680-695. (2020)
13. Vovk N., Klymash M.: Problem-oriented social network for the exchange of international
professional experience // CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Vol. 2392 : Proceedings of the 1st
International workshop on control, optimisation and analytical processing of social networks
(COAPSN-2019), Lviv, Ukraine, May 16–17, 2019. P. 252–262. (2019)
14. Shakhovska N., Peleshyshyn O., Myna Z., Bilushchak T.: Online community information
model for use in marketing activities // CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Vol. 2392 : Proceed-
ings of the 1st International workshop on control, optimisation and analytical processing of
social networks (COAPSN-2019), (Lviv, Ukraine, May 16–17, 2019). P. 263–272. (2019)
15. Mastykash O., Liubinskyi, B., Topylko, P., Penyak, I.: Ranking the social media platform
user pages using big data. Mathematical Modeling and Computing. Volume 5, Issue 1, Pag-
es 56-65. (2018)
16. Shakhovska N., Duda O., Matsiuk O., Bolyubash Y., Vovnyanka R.: Analysis of the Activi-
ty of Territorial Communities Using Information Technology of Big Data Based on the Enti-
ty-Characteristic Mode. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing III, vol 871, pp.
155-170. (2019)
17. Artem K., Holoshchuk R., Kunanets N., Shestakevysh T., Rzheuskyi A.: Information Sup-
port of Scientific Researches of Virtual Communities on the Platform of Cloud Services,
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing III, vol 871, pp. 301-311. (2019)