Prioritization of Security Indicators at Organization of the Life Cycle of Virtual Communities Olha Trach[0000-0003-1461-791X] and Andriy Peleshchyshyn [0000-0002-5022-0410] Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine olya@trach.com.ua, apele@ridne.net Abstract. The article presents the classification and algorithms for determining the prioritization of virtual community life cycle organization indicators. The prioritization of indicators for the direction tasks is divided into: critical, not critical and important. The algorithms presented are necessary for quality and structured management of the virtual community. Also presented is the inter- face of the program "Organization of the life cycle of virtual communities". The application has the option of determining the priority of indicators in the direc- tions of organization of the lifecycle of the virtual community. Keywords: virtual community, life cycle, prioritizing, indicators 1 Introduction Today, virtual communities have become one of the largest media platforms for meet- ing user needs. Virtual communities are widely used in various fields, including: mass media [1-3], science [4-6], medicine [7-10]. The virtual community survey metrics previously described in [11] are quantitative parameters — three required to complete tasks in the lifecycle of virtual communities. Task metrics are also used to calculate community entry into a socially-risk-averse area [12]. Documenting and tracking the dynamics of the virtual community lifecycle is an important security issue. Prioritization is necessary to prevent socially-oriented risks in managing the commu- nity and to lose control of the community, improves the timing of the steps, because it eliminates delays in completing the tasks of the directions, and poor quality tasks are immediately rejected. Also, prioritizing is important for correctly identifying the tasks that need to be ad- dressed in terms of media literacy, relevance and credibility. Copyright © 2020 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attrib- ution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) CMiGIN-2019: International Workshop on Conflict Management in Global Information Networks. 2 Prioritizing of indicators of directions of organization of the life cycle of virtual communities For qualitative fulfillment of tasks of organization of life cycle of the virtual commu- nity, indicators of tasks of directions of organization of life cycle of the virtual com- munity are introduced. For fast and qualitative fulfillment of the formulated tasks in accordance with the purpose and goals of creating a virtual community, it is necessary to determine the priority of indicators of the tasks of organizing the lifecycle of the virtual community. In order to prioritize indicators, the inputs and targets of the virtu- al organization of the life cycle of virtual communities tasks are required. Comparing the input and output indicators of the virtual community lifecycle tasks allows you to determine the quality of the tasks performed in the previous stages and take into account the planned performance of the virtual community lifecycle tasks and the level of community creation. Determining the priorities of the indicators of the organization of the lifecycle of the virtual community are divided into (fig. 1): Priority of indicators Critical Non-critical Important Fig. 1. Classification of prioritizing of indicators Critical indicators of the tasks of the organization of the lifecycle of the virtual com- munity. Indicators are critical to meeting the goals of organizing the lifecycle of a virtual community. If the inequality is not met, the tasks should be rejected. Directions are fulfilled if the following equality is fulfilled: k iDr  * k iDr (1) 0, якщоIndP  IndI  (2) k Dr   IndP  IndI , IndP  IndI i   IndP * k Dr where i – the permissible delta set by the virtual community lifecycle manager; IndP – planned target of directing the lifecycle of the virtual community; IndI – a real indicator of the task of organizing the lifecycle of the virtual communi- ty, formed in the previous stage; Dr  Us, Inf , Rp, Rs – user, information, reputation, and resource directions of the virtual community lifecycle, respectively. Non-critical indicators of the tasks of directions of organization of life cycle of the virtual community. Indicators of direction tasks are non-critical for the purpose of directing the lifecycle of a virtual community. Let – scattering of relative deviations of planned and real indicators of tasks of directions of organization of life cycle of virtual community: 1/ 2 N 1      ( kiDr )2  i 1 N  (3) Important indicators of the task of directing the lifecycle of the virtual. The im- portance of an indicator of the task of organizing the lifecycle of a virtual community indicates the criticality of individual indicators. The task will only be accomplished using important metrics, others will be rejected. To determine the importance of the indicator, we use the Euclidean measure of proximity. Important indicators of the tasks of the organization of the life cycle of virtual com- munities area are determined if its individual value exceeds the total scatter: Ind iDr   (4) Dr moreover Indi is calculated by the formula: Ind iDr   ( Ind i Dr ) 2 * wiDr (5) where Ind Dr  0, якщоIndP  IndI ,    i ( IndP IndI ), IndP IndI wiDr – the weighting factor defined by the virtual community lifecycle manager, 0  wi  1 wi  w w i w wi  1 , , ; IndP – planned target of directing the lifecycle of the virtual community; IndI – a real indicator of the task of organizing the lifecycle of the virtual communi- ty, formed in the previous stage; Dr Us, Inf , Rp, Rs – user, information, reputation, and resource directions of the virtu- al community lifecycle, respectively. 3 Algorithms for determining the prioritizing of indicators of the task of organization of the life cycle of virtual communities The algorithm for determining the critical indicators of the task of directing the lifecycle of the virtual community is designed to determine the criticality of the indi- cator of the task of directing the lifecycle of the virtual community and the expedien- cy of the task. The implementation of the Critical Indicators Algorithm for the virtual community lifecycle assignment is the responsibility of the executor and the community manager, who is responsible for setting the allowable delta for determining the criticality of the indicator. The result of performing the algorithm is to determine the criticality of the indicators and to perform the task of organizing the lifecycle of the virtual community or reject- ing it (fig. 2). Beginning Setting objectives IndIn iDr, Input and planned IndPlaniDr performance of the task Updating the Definition statement of the Δ*kiDr,ΔkiDr task Yes Error analysis The success of the ΔkiDr≤ Δ*kiDr and correction analysis Yes No Implementation Rejection of the tasks task IndOutiDr Formation of the output indicator Go to the next task End Fig. 2. An algorithm for determining the critical indicators of the task of life cycle organization The algorithm for determining non-critical performance indices of the virtual com- munity lifecycle has been developed to determine the non-critical performance indica- tor of the virtual community lifecycle and task accomplishment. The implementation of the algorithm for determining non-critical indicators of the task of directing the organization of the lifecycle of the virtual community is the re- sponsibility of the executor of the community and the manager of the community, which is responsible for establishing a valid delta for determining the non-criticality of the indicator. The result of the algorithm is to determine the non-criticality of indicators and to per- form the task of organizing the lifecycle of the virtual community (fig. 3). Beginning 1 Setting objectives Tasks IndIniDr, Output Input and planned IndPlaniDr indicators performance of IndOutiDr the task Definition ΔkiDr Go to the next task   ( kiDr )2 End 1 Fig. 3. An algorithm for determining non-critical indicators of the task of organizing the virtual lifecycle The algorithm for determining the importance of indicators of the task of the organi- zation of the lifecycle of the virtual community is designed to determine the important indicators of the task of the organization of the lifecycle of the virtual community. The rejection of impractical indicators of the task of the organization of the lifecycle of the virtual community and to complete the task. (fig. 4). Beginning 1 Setting objectives IndiDr=0 IndIniDr, Input and planned 2 IndPlaniDr performance of the task Tasks Determination of the weight factor ωiDr Output indicator IndOutiDr Definition IndN Go to the next task IndiDr= IndPlan≤IndIn Ні IndPlan-IndIn End Так 2 1 Fig. 4. An algorithm for determining important indicators of the task of organizing the lifecycle of a virtual community The implementation of the algorithm for determining important indicators of the task of organizing the lifecycle of the virtual community is the responsibility of the execu- tor of the community and the manager of the community, which is responsible for establishing a valid delta determination of the non-criticality of the indicator. The result of the algorithm is to identify important indicators, rejection of impractical indicators and perform the task of organizing the lifecycle of the virtual community. 4 The user interface for the organization of the life cycle of virtual communities software application The essence of the software-algorithmic complex show on fig. 5. WORK ON CREATING AND MANAGING A COMMUNITY FORMATION OF A TEAM OF EXECUTORS AND MANAGEMENT OF PERFORMERS PRIORITIZATION OF INDICATORS DOCUMENTATION OF THE PROCESS OF ORGANIZING THE LIFECYCLE OF VC Fig. 5. The essence of the software-algorithmic complex The user interface “Organization of the life cycle of virtual communities” is devel- oped (fig. 6). Fig. 6. The user interface “Organization of the life cycle of virtual communities” When you create a virtual community, the primary data will be: community name, community information, and the virtual community's main highlight. The Virtual Community Manager also identifies the executors of the virtual community lifecycle organization. When defining contractors, the manager of the virtual community lifecycle organization records the contractors, which include the primary details of the burglars: surname and first name, position (specialty), telephone, email (fig. 7). Fig. 7. The user interface “Organization of the life cycle of virtual communities” Artist information is written to the virtual community lifecycle artist database. According to the task of organizing the lifecycle of the virtual community, the man- ager chooses the direction of organizing the lifecycle of the virtual community. Selects the appropriate contractor, and indicators of the direction of organization of the lifecycle of the virtual community, and determines the timing of the task and se- lects the priority of the task of organizing the lifecycle of the virtual community (fig- ure 8). Fig. 8. The user interface “Organization of the life cycle of virtual communities” The next step in the software “Organization of the life cycle of virtual communities” is the definition of a metric that is calculated on the basis of a benchmark and a metric based on analysis. Important in the software “Organization of the life cycle of virtual communities” there is also a prioritization of indicators in the implementation of the objectives of the life cycle organization according to the algorithms developed in the section. This feature improves the timing of the steps, eliminating delays in the execution of direc- tion tasks, and defective tasks are immediately rejected. All metric results are recorded in the virtual community lifecycle database. On the basis of these data, the executors form a manager's report on the task of organizing the lifecycle of the virtual community. Conclusion The complex of work associated with the project activity of the virtual community has many features. Formalizing the lifecycle of a virtual community provides a better approach to the processes of planning, analyzing, developing and managing a virtual community. Measuring the prioritization of metrics allows you to manage the com- munity in a quality way and protect your users from various threats. Software application “Organization of the life cycle of virtual communities” assists administrators with media literacy manage the community and adhere to media hy- giene practices in the virtual community. References 1. Fedushko, S., Syerov, Y., Kolos, S.: Hashtag as а Way of Archiving and Distributing Infor- mation on the Internet. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2019. Vol. 2386: Workshop Proceed- ings of the 8th International Conference on “Mathematics. Information Technologies. Edu- cation 2019. P. 274–286. (2019) 2. Zakharchenko, А., Maksimtsova, Y., Iurchenko, V., Shevchenko, V., Fedushko, S.: Under the Conditions of Non-Agenda Ownership: Social Media Users in the 2019 Ukrainian Presi- dential Elections Campaign. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2019. Vol 2392: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Control, Optimisation and Analytical Processing of So- cial Networks (COAPSN-2019). P. 199–219. (2019) 3. Fedushko, S., Ustyianovych, T.: Predicting Pupil’s Successfulness Factors Using Machine Learning Algorithms and Mathematical Modelling Methods. In: Hu Z., Petoukhov S., Dychka I., He M. (eds) Advances in Computer Science for Engineering and Education II. ICCSEEA 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 938. Springer, Cham. pp 625-636. (2020) 4. Anisimova, O., Vasylenko, V., Fedushko, S.: Social Networks as a Tool for a Higher Educa- tion Institution Image Creation. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. – 2019. Vol 2392: Proceed- ings of the 1st International Workshop on Control, Optimisation and Analytical Processing of Social Networks (COAPSN-2019). P. 54–65. (2019) 5. Wang, J., Yang, J., Chen, Q., Tsai, S.: Creating the sustainable conditions for knowledge information sharing in virtual community. Springerplus, 5. 9 (2016). 6. Berezko, O., Zhezhnych, P.: Rethinking the NGO website from the knowledge management perspective. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies, CSIT 2017. pp. 389-392 (2017). 7. Fedushko, S., EleonoraBenova, E.: Semantic analysis for information and communication threats detection of online service users. The 10th International Conference on Emerging Ubiquitous Systems and Pervasive Networks (EUSPN 2019) November 4-7, 2019, Coimbra, Portugal. Procedia Computer Science, Volume 160, 2019, Pages 254-259. (2019) 8. Syerov, Y., Shakhovska, N., Fedushko, S.: Method of the Data Adequacy Determination of Personal Medical Profiles. Proceedings of the International Conference of Artificial Intelli- gence, Medical Engineering, Education (AIMEE2018). Advances in Artificial Systems for Medicine and Education II. Volume 902, 2019. pp. 333-343. (2018) 9. Shakhovska N., Shakhovska K., Fedushko S. Some Aspects of the Method for Tourist Route Creation. Proceedings of the International Conference of Artificial Intelligence, Medical Engineering, Education (AIMEE2018). Advances in Artificial Systems for Medicine and Education II. Volume 902. pp 527-537. (2019) 10. Fedushko, S., Davidekova, M.: Analytical service for processing behavioral, psychological and communicative features in the online communication. The International Workshop on Digitalization and Servitization within Factory-Free Economy (D&SwFFE 2019) November 4-7, 2019, Coimbra, Portugal. Procedia Computer Science. Volume 160, Pages 509-514. (2019) 11. Trach O., Peleshchyshyn A.: Development of directions tasks indicators of virtual communi- ty life cycle organization. Proceedings of the XIth International Scientific and Technical Conference "Computer Sciences and Information Technologies" (CSIT-2017). Lviv, 05-08 September 2017. P. 127–130. (2017) 12. Trach, O., Fedushko, S.: Determination of Measures of Counteraction to the Social-Oriented Risks of Virtual Community Life Cycle Organization. In: Shakhovska N., Medykovskyy M. (eds) Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing IV. CCSIT 2019. Advances in Intelli- gent Systems and Computing, vol 1080. Springer, Cham. pp. 680-695. (2020) 13. Vovk N., Klymash M.: Problem-oriented social network for the exchange of international professional experience // CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Vol. 2392 : Proceedings of the 1st International workshop on control, optimisation and analytical processing of social networks (COAPSN-2019), Lviv, Ukraine, May 16–17, 2019. P. 252–262. (2019) 14. Shakhovska N., Peleshyshyn O., Myna Z., Bilushchak T.: Online community information model for use in marketing activities // CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Vol. 2392 : Proceed- ings of the 1st International workshop on control, optimisation and analytical processing of social networks (COAPSN-2019), (Lviv, Ukraine, May 16–17, 2019). P. 263–272. (2019) 15. Mastykash O., Liubinskyi, B., Topylko, P., Penyak, I.: Ranking the social media platform user pages using big data. Mathematical Modeling and Computing. Volume 5, Issue 1, Pag- es 56-65. (2018) 16. Shakhovska N., Duda O., Matsiuk O., Bolyubash Y., Vovnyanka R.: Analysis of the Activi- ty of Territorial Communities Using Information Technology of Big Data Based on the Enti- ty-Characteristic Mode. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing III, vol 871, pp. 155-170. (2019) 17. Artem K., Holoshchuk R., Kunanets N., Shestakevysh T., Rzheuskyi A.: Information Sup- port of Scientific Researches of Virtual Communities on the Platform of Cloud Services, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing III, vol 871, pp. 301-311. (2019)