<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>1 Mimyk Medical Simulations Pvt. Ltd, Authors contributed equally</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Vishnusai Y</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Prithvi Prakash</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Nithin Shivashankar</string-name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>In this paper, we discuss our submissions for the Endoscopic Disease Detection Challenge (EDD2020) [1], which had two sub-challenges. The first task involved a bounding box based multi-class detection of diseases, namely Polyp, Barrett's Esophagus (BE), Cancer, Suspicious and HighGrade Dysplasia (HGD). The second task involved creating semantic masks of the images for the aforementioned class of diseases. For the disease detection task we submitted the predictions of a Faster R-CNN with a ResNeXt-101 backbone and achieved a dscore of 0.1335 0.0936. For the semantic segmentation task, we employed a U-NET with a ResNeXt50 backbone that achieved an sscore of 0.5031.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        1. METHOD
1.1. Disease Detection Task
For the disease detection task we made use of a Faster R-CNN
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ] object detector with a ResNeXt-101 serving as the
backbone. Prior to feeding the data into our Neural Network model
we applied augmentation techniques based on RandAugment
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] to improve the generalization capability of the neural
network. From a choice of 16 augmentation techniques, two
augmentation transformations were selected at random. We
observed that magnitudes of 4, 5, 6 gave out the most
effective augmentations and hence, this was chosen. The Faster
R-CNN model was trained for 10 epochs and the learning rate
was set to 0.01. The images were resized to 1300x800 pixels.
1.2. Semantic Segmentation Task
The U-NET [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ] Architecture was used for the semantic
segmentation task. Five separate U-NET models were created
to train individual models to segment out different diseases.
Prior to feeding our data to each U-NET, the images and
masks were scaled to 256x256 pixels. It was then split to
ensure that a proportionate sample of the true classes was
present in both the sets. This was done by the K-Means
clustering algorithm and sampling an 80-20 split from each
bucket. The number buckets was decided using the
ElbowMethod. We then applied augmentations on the train images
namely: flip, zoom, and rotate and then trained them on a
U-NET with a ResNeXt-50 backbone for 150 epochs.
2. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION
      </p>
      <p>Disease Detection Task</p>
      <p>Model mAP
ResNet-101 0.1724
ResNeXt-101 0.2235
Semantic Segmentation Task</p>
      <p>Model Train IoU
Single Model 0.381</p>
      <p>BE Model 0.871
Cancer Model 0.782
HGD Model 0.814</p>
      <p>Polyp Model 0.932</p>
      <p>Suspicious Model 0.434
Aggregate Model (2-6) 0.766
Val IoU
0.121
0.542
0.217
0.313
0.571
0.115
0.351</p>
      <p>The results of the disease detection and segmentation
tasks are summarised in Table 1. From the disease
detection section, we see that the ResNeXt-101 outperformed
the ResNet-101. On submission we obtained a dscore of
0.1335 0.0936. From the semantic segmentation task
section, we observe that the individual disease models performed
better than a single model trained for all diseases. This
prompted us to adopt an aggregate model that aggregated the
results of the individual disease models. On submitting the
predictions of this aggregate model on the test dataset, an
sscore of 0.5031 was obtained.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Sharib</given-names>
            <surname>Ali</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Noha Ghatwary, Barbara Braden, Dominique Lamarque, Adam Bailey, Stefano Realdon, Renato Cannizzaro, Jens Rittscher,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Christian</given-names>
            <surname>Daul</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>James</given-names>
            <surname>East</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <source>Endoscopy disease detection challenge</source>
          <year>2020</year>
          . arXiv preprint arXiv:
          <year>2003</year>
          .03376,
          <year>2020</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>[2] Ren et</article-title>
          . al.
          <article-title>Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems - Volume</source>
          <volume>1</volume>
          ,
          <issue>NIPS15</issue>
          , page 9199, Cambridge, MA, USA,
          <year>2015</year>
          . MIT Press.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ekin</surname>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Cubuk et</article-title>
          . al. Randaugment:
          <article-title>Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search space</article-title>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Olaf</given-names>
            <surname>Ronneberger</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Philipp</given-names>
            <surname>Fischer</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Thomas</given-names>
            <surname>Brox</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Unet:
          <article-title>Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Medical Image Computing and ComputerAssisted Intervention (MICCAI)</source>
          , volume
          <volume>9351</volume>
          <source>of LNCS</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>234</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>241</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2015</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>