<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Formalization of Ukrainian-Language Content for Fuzzy Product in Court</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>kurov</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Yurii Fil</string-name>
          <email>4fileyyuriy@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>National University «Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic»</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Zaporizhzhia</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>This paper is devoted to the development of a method of formalizing Ukrainian-language content for fuzzy output production systems. Three variants of variables, which described in a text document, were proposed. The application's effectiveness of the proposed variants of variables initialization for production systems in the field of justice was carried out. It was made on the example of the processing of the verdicts texts in separate articles. The studies were conducted using the automated system Neuro-Adaptive Learning ANFIS in MATLAB. The best accuracy were provided by normalized initialization functions which used the positional calculus system with the least possible basis.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>decision-making</kwd>
        <kwd>court sentence</kwd>
        <kwd>Ukrainian-language content</kwd>
        <kwd>ontology</kwd>
        <kwd>fuzzy production system</kwd>
        <kwd>the order ratio</kwd>
        <kwd>graph</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>There are different models of information technologies implementation in the justice
field in the world practice [1]. The concepts of "e-justice", "e- proceedings", "e-court"
or "online court" have been fixed by law. Ukraine is a member of the continental legal
system. Among the countries with such legal model, the most developed is
e-proceedings of Germany, where the filling of documents, processing and adjudication
are done in electronic format [2]. The sentencing process formalizing is a discussion
issue. The large volume of legal norms, documentation of cases, the pressure of
responsibility for the human fate, the ambition of a just sentence creates a diversity of attitudes
to this question [3]. Recognizing that modern advanced technologies will not replace
the lawyer profession, it can be argued that they allow professionals to work effectively
with large amounts of information that passes through the analytical system.</p>
      <p>The work [4] emphasizes the steady interest increase to the intellectual systems use
in various fields, particular, in jurisprudence. Modern intellectual systems use
knowledge bases that are formed according to the subject area. One of the main results
of [4] is the development of data extraction method based on the ontological knowledge
base of syntax analysis of Ukrainian-language text documents.</p>
      <p>The study results on the construction of the product rules base and its optimization
are presented, for example, in [5]. This study develops models and algorithms for
optimizing the design of conjugated fuzzy knowledge bases using the criteria of “precision
output - complexity” as a min-max clustering problem.</p>
      <p>In another work [6], a study was conducted on the comparative analysis of four
hybrid artificial intelligence models for the prediction of probable fires; each model
consists of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) [7] combined with a specific
metaheuristic optimization algorithm.</p>
      <p>In this paper, authors set out to develop a common knowledge base of sentencing in
the combination of different circumstances to create a basis for determining similar
sentences in similar in composition and circumstances of the crimes. Such knowledge
base can be used as a reference or training base.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Related Works</title>
      <p>As you know, the production system System formally displays
System : Input  Output , where in the most general sense, the input is given
information Input that should affect the output result Output . In common case, the input
information Input is verbal, qualitative, nonmetric, unstructured, or poorly structured.
This information may contain a description of the phenomenon, object, process. It is
necessary to distinguish such information about one or more attributes, features,
properties of these phenomena, objects or processes that are significant in the sense of
influencing the output result Output . The outputs Output contain information about
possible alternative solutions, thus this information can be considered more structured.</p>
      <p>The research conducted in this work is a further development of the binary relation
Listening: Court  Court Рrocess that is introduced into the basic ontology of the
law system [8]. The preliminary results reported by the authors in [9, 10, 11] allowed
us to determine the model and stages of building a knowledge base for sentencing,
namely the presentation of knowledge in the form of a fuzzy inference product model.</p>
      <p>The development of the knowledge base goes through these four stages.</p>
      <p>At the first stage, the authors formed the structure of the ontology of the court
decision, which is outlined in [9]. The developed ontology of the sentence is a structure that
clearly illustrates the relationship between the concepts that are the classes of input
(offerder’s personality, judge's personality, circumstances burdening and mitigating the
crime) needed to make a decision and the degree of punishment presented by a fine,
restriction and imprisonment (real and conditional), public works (Fig.1).</p>
      <p>The ontology of a court sentence has become the basis for developing a model of a
productive decision support system (DSS) in court.</p>
      <p>At the second stage, in [10], this article’s authors constructed a system of fuzzy
inference to support court decisions. In such form, the construction of the ontology of the
court decision allowed to develop a general model of DSS in a court that has the form:
(Fine, Years, RF, Public Works, Condition) = F(Severity, Mitigation, Personality,</p>
      <p>
        Burden, Lawyer), (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        )
where F is the corresponding output algorithm; Severity is characterizes the severity of
the crime; Personality is characterizes the guilty person; Mitigation are mitigating
circumstances; Burden are circumstances that burden the punishment; Lawyer is the level
of neutrality of a court’s decision and takes value with the term {loyal, neutral, strict};
Fine is the size of the fine; Years are the number of years of imprisonment; RF
(Restriction of freedom) is restriction of freedom; Public Works are Public Works.
      </p>
      <p>Condition determines the actual or conditional entry into action.</p>
      <p>General ideas were tested on the implementation of the DSS for a separate article of
the Criminal Code of Ukraine in two variants, with Mamdani and Sugeno algorithms
[10]. The experiment was conducted on sentences under Article 185 of the Criminal
Code [12] of Ukraine on theft contained in the register of court decisions of Ukraine
[13].</p>
      <p>An interesting feature of production systems is that the Input information at the
input of system is textual, and at the output there should be information containing a
quantitative component. This feature gives rise to the need to initialize qualitative
variables that are characterized by natural language. Therefore, in the third stage it is
necessary to build a model of concepts developed by the ontology. This requires the
creation of algorithms for handling existing court cases. The theoretical substantiation of
the stage is outlined in [11], which proposes a method of constructing a membership
function for fuzzy sets of terms of a linguistic variable that allows to formalize verbal
information for production systems.</p>
      <p>Next, in the fourth stage, it is necessary to build the production base and optimize it.
By optimization we mean ensuring the achievement of conflicting goals, namely,
improving the accuracy of output while reducing the complexity of the system. The
automated Neuro-Adaptive Learning ANFIS in MATLAB system was used to test possible
approaches to performing the tasks of the fuzzy output production system optimization
and optimization process [7].</p>
      <p>In this work attention is focused on the last two stages and demonstration of
possibilities of the formalization method of Ukrainian-language content for creation of a
fuzzy production system on the basis of initialized input vectors.
3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Our Approach for Evaluating Variables Contained in</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Ukrainian-Language Content</title>
      <p>Further studies allowed to apply the results obtained in [11] to construct a method for
initializing the input vectors of a fuzzy production system, which allows to formalize
the information contained in textual form and to adjust the system itself. The method
consists of four steps: modeling information of Ukrainian-language content in the form
of digraphs; building order relations on the elements of this model; initialization of
input vectors; fuzzy production system setup.</p>
      <p>In the setup of fuzzy production system, we will understand the definition of
membership functions for fuzzy sets of terms of linguistic input variable information,
production rules, and accurate output estimation by the Sugeno fuzzy output method.</p>
      <p>Initialization variables must be defined for the vector of input variables. Assume that
the variable  contains an estimate of certain text information Input that is put to the
product system input.</p>
      <p>The first step of the method is the modeling of ontology concepts [9] in the form of
a digraph H in Fig. 2 [14].</p>
      <p>Assume that the variable  is characterized by n nonmetric features Pi , i  1, n
forming the set P , P= n . Each feature Pi can take ki values pij , j  1, ki . Each
X  xs xs  p1 js1 , p2 js2 ,..., pnjsn ,1  jsi  ki ,i  1, n.
branch of the order H defines a specific feature Pi , i  1, n . The vertexes
corresponding to the features Pi , i  1, n form the first tier. The second tier consists of the leaves
of the order H , which are possible values pij of the feature Pi .</p>
      <p>To determine the set of features P and the possible meanings of these features, a
semantic analysis of textual information is required [14].</p>
      <p>The second step of the method is to build the order of the plural order X .
The domain of the variable definition  is determined by the Cartesian product of
nonn
metric features X  P1  P2 ... Pn , X  i1 ki :
The problem is that the arbitrary positioning of the value xs on the abscissa does not
allow to build an initialization function f (xs ) with predefined properties. Therefore,
it is necessary to define a bijective mapping f : X  R that meets two requirements:
1. the reproduction of a binary order  that corresponds to the natural ordering xs of
a certain quality criterion, and
2. fulfillment of conditions of monotonicity of the initialization function f (xs ) .
The theoretical basis of the ordering of the set X is given in [11].
X  xs xs  p1 js1 , p2 js2 ,..., pnjsn ,1  jsi  ki , i  1, n.</p>
      <p>The result of the method’s second step is an ordered set of feature values, which enables
the ordered arrangement of the abscissa of the vectors set
The third step is to define the initialization functions for the variable  .</p>
      <p>To determine the identifier xs , we apply positional numeral system with base, in
which the digit 10ni1 is determined by the sequence number of the vertex describing
the feature Pi in the strict order column and the digit jsi - the sequence number of the
value pijsi for the feature Pi , which was implemented in the vector xs . Let denote the
absence of a value for a particular sign as “0”. Place the vectors of the values P of the
traits on the abscissa axis according to the defined order p,  .</p>
      <p>At the fourth step, to set up a fuzzy product system, it is needed to build the vectors
of the input xs  p1 js1 , p2 js2 ,..., pnjsn ,1  jsi  ki , i  1, n , xs  X , and output data.
Functional dependency views f (xs ) should reproduce the intuitively expected evaluation of
an object  , that is, fit the order  and provide general requirements for the
monotony of the function.</p>
      <p>For large values ki ,i  1, n and n , the number of vectors X is too large for the
expert definition of the initialization function. Therefore, it is advisable to automate the
initialization functions’ construction, which further will be used to train the fuzzy
production system on the values of the input and output variables.</p>
      <p>
        The following types of formulas are offered to determine the initialization function
f (xs ) , where  r , r  1,2 - parameters:
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        )
n
f (xs )  1   2 * i1 jsi * basei , 0  jsi  ki
One of definition variant is base  10 . It is also advisable to determine the basis of the
calculation system base , where base  1mod(max ji ) . Another way to define the
initialization function as linear:
      </p>
      <p>f (xs )  3  4 * num(xs )
where num(xs ) is the sequence number of the vector xs in order  .
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Experiments</title>
      <p>
        The authors aimed to conduct an experiment to investigate the effectiveness of applying
formula (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ) with different bases of the calculation system and formula (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ) to build
estimates of the input vectors of a fuzzy production system.
      </p>
      <p>To achieve this aim, the capabilities of the automated system Neuro-Adaptive
Learning ANFIS in MATLAB were used [7]. To train the fuzzy system with the
neuroadaptive methods’ help, matrix is formed from the input and output experiments’ data. In
order to form a fuzzy output system, which works with neuro-adaptive methods and
satisfies the output quality requirements, ANFIS training should be conducted on a
sample data that fully reflects the features of the simulation data.</p>
      <p>According to Art. 65, 66, 67 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine [12], as in previous
works [9, 10], the following methods were chosen by the method of direct logical
deduction by input linguistic variables: Severity - severity of the crime committed;
Personality - characteristic of the person of the offender which takes value from the
termset {negative, neutral, positive}; Mitigation - an assessment of the judge's ability to
consider the amount of mitigating circumstances to the crime; Burden - assessment of
the judge's ability of taking into account the number of burden circumstances; Lawyer
characterizes the level of neutrality of the judge and takes the value from the term-set
{loyal, neutral, strict}. We will assume that the judge is "neutral".</p>
      <p>
        The analysis of the verdicts in court cases showed that there was another element
that influenced the court's decision. This is the plaintiff. Therefore, the model (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        )
presented in [10] is supplemented by the linguistic variable Plaintiff, which takes the value
from the term {adjusting to mitigation, neutral, not adjusting to mitigation}.
      </p>
      <p>The following general model of DSS is proposed in court:
(Fine, Years, RF, Public Works, Condition) = F (Severity, Lawyer, Personality,
Plaintiff, Mitigation, Burden), (4)
where F is the corresponding fuzzy inference algorithm.</p>
      <p>For the experiment were selected part 3 Art. 185 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine
on theft and part 2 Art. 240 "Violation of the rules of protection or use of subsoil" [12].</p>
      <p>The experiments were performed to construct a fuzzy inference system by the
Sugeno algorithm. The mathematical model of DSS was adopted in accordance with
the selected articles in court:
(Years) = SUGENO(Personality, Plaintiff, Mitigation, Burden)
(5)
The models’ simplification with relation to the general (4) was made in view of the fact
that the gravity of the crime is unchanged within the scope of a specific article of the
Criminal Code. The automatic implementation of Sugeno output with Neuro-Adaptive
Learning ANFIS in MATLAB allows to get the only one output that was chosen Years
or Fine.
4.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-5-1">
        <title>An Example of Production System Construction According to Part 385 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine</title>
        <p>The first step: modeling ontology concepts in the form of digraphs.</p>
        <p>For its realization it is necessary to select information concerning variables:
Personality, Mitigation, Burden, Plaintiff, which are defined in (4). The collection of
documents consisted of 25 court sentences under part 385 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.
The documents were obtained from the Unified Register in accordance with the rules
for using this electronic resource containing certain restrictions for access [13]. The
statutory form of the court decision contains an introductory, motivating and resolutive
part. The information about the offender is contained in the introductory part, in the
explanatory part the court indicates what information about the person of the defendant
is taken into account when determining his sentence, circumstances that mitigate or
burden the sentence. The resolution section contains the court's decision on sanctions.</p>
        <p>The study used the methods of semantic analysis [15, 16]: the signal words in the
HTML document highlighted the necessary paragraphs of the motivation part, which
built the libraries, removed the stop words from the Unified Register of court sentences,
stamming, calculation of term-document matrices with TF-IDF weight index use.</p>
        <p>The categories of terms and words corresponding to the terms of the ontologies
concepts were distinguished: the person of the guilty; the plaintiff; the mitigating and
burdening circumstances. Synonyms for each concept were expertly created from the
chosen terms. Models are represented by digraphs in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4.</p>
        <p>For example, let’s look at many of the features for Personality in Ukrainian, in
courts’ decision language:</p>
        <p>1
PPersonaliyt  {працевлаштування, сімейний стан, проживання, реєстрація,
характеристика, перебування на обліку, наявність зв‘язків, кримінальна
відповідальність, судимість}, P  9 .</p>
        <p>In the second step we will define the area of definition of variables Personality and
Plaintiff.</p>
        <p>Therefore, the domain of the variable X definition is a Cartesian product of the
fea</p>
        <p>
          X  1728
tures X  P1  P2 ... P9 , whose power . The digraph in Fig. 3 reflects the
expertly defined order of characteristics relative to the term "positive person". This
makes it possible to arrange 1728 plural elements X .
In the third step, we calculate the normalized values of the estimates based on the
formula (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
          ) with base  10 , base  4 and on the formula (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
          ) (Fig. 5 a)).
        </p>
        <p>Similar actions are performed for the Plaintiff model.</p>
        <p>1</p>
        <p>Pplaintiff  {відшкодування отримав, моральні збитки, просить пом‘якшення},
P  3 .</p>
        <p>
          Therefore, the domain of the variable X definition is a Cartesian product of the
features X  P1  P2  P3 , whose power X  8 . The digraph displays an expertly defined
order of characteristics with respect to the term "Adjusting to mitigation".
For variables Personality and Plaintiff initialization functions were built. In formulas
(
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
          ) - (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
          ) assume that  k , k  1,7 . Normalized initialization functions for variable
Personality are presented in Fig. 5 a), for variable Plaintiff in Fig. 5 b).
        </p>
        <p>The fourth step, namely the definition of a linguistic variable based on the model
created and the fuzzy production system setup, was carried out using the automated
ANFIS in MATLAB system. The network learning method is a hybrid, which is a
combination of the least-squares method and the inverse gradient reduction method.
a)
In Fig. 6 shown the structure of the neuro-fuzzy system. The system consists of 4 layers.
On the first layer put the numerical values of the input vector. The second layer is a
phase layer in which the modules reproduce a fuzzy membership function to represent
the input values in a fuzzy set. Each module at this level corresponds to a certain fuzzy
set. The next layer defines the fuzzy rules. Each module at this level meets certain rules.
Each node connects to those nodes of the first layer that form the preconditions of the
corresponding rule. The modules implement operations "AND" with a minimum in the
t-norm form [16]. The fourth layer implements an output device, one for each output.</p>
        <p>
          The input vectors are initialized by function (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
          ) with the basis either base  10 , or
base  4 for Personality and base  2 for Plaintiff, or (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
          ) with normalization and
without normalization. The experiment results showed that the best accuracy was
obtained with the normalized initialization functions (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
          ) base  4 for Personality and
base  2 for Plaintiff. The biggest error is given by function (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
          ).
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-2">
        <title>An Example of Building Production System under Part 2 of Art. 240 of the</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-3">
        <title>Criminal Code of Ukraine</title>
        <p>The variable model Personality is the same as the previous example. The Plaintiff in
Article 240 is considered the state. The state's mitigation of the sentence is provided by
the Law of Ukraine on the Use of Amnesty in Ukraine [18]. Therefore, the model of
the Plaintiff variable is represented in relation to the effect of this law, and the ordering
is made in relation to the term "Adjusting to mitigation".
 , Pplaintif  1 . Therefore, the variable definition area</p>
        <p>
          2
Pp2laintif has power X p2laintif  2 . The digraph in Fig. 7 reflects the expertly defined order
of characteristics. In the third step, we calculate the normalized values of the estimates
based on the formula (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
          ) with base  10 or base  4 for Personality and base  2 for
Plaintiff, or (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
          ) with normalization and without normalization (Fig. 5 a)).
        </p>
        <p>Several experiments were performed for the selected sentence collection: for
sentences containing fines; for sentences containing years of imprisonment and restriction
of freedom, and for the general sample with pre-coding of sentences according to the
severity of the sentence. Construction and training of fuzzy inference systems were
performed. Experiments were conducted with variants of forming an input vector
similar to Example 1. The conclusions were obtained similar to Example 1.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Discussions and Further Researches</title>
      <p>
        In practical application of the initialization functions (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ) - (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ), some certain features
must be considered.
      </p>
      <p>
        The estimates (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ) need normalization, to provide a global scale when not all
attributes of a qualitative variable  have their characteristics.
      </p>
      <p>The initialization functions are discrete, which makes it possible to obtain a finite
set of evaluation values.</p>
      <p>For the adopted method, not all values of the abscissa axis are implemented in
vectors xs . Entering an identifier corresponding to the number of possible values
ki ,i  1, n for each trait will eliminate the redundancy.</p>
      <p>With many features, there are limitations in the accuracy of the calculations. In this
case, it would be appropriate to break the set of features into subsets, with their further
implementation in separate product rules.</p>
      <p>In terms of further research, methods of distinguishing the terms of the concepts of
the ontology of the court decision need to be developed. It is necessary to build
sufficiently exact ‘fine’ algorithms for recognition of the semantics of court sentences,
because the vocabulary contains antonymic pairs, differing in the proportion "no",
homonyms, the same keywords for different classes of information.
6</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Conclusions and Acknowledgment</title>
      <p>Scientific novelty is determined by firstly developed common Sentence Knowledge
Base based on the method of formalizing Ukrainian-language content for fuzzy output
production systems. The structure of the information contained in the court sentence is
based on a combination of different crime circumstances reflected in the court's DSS
model and ways of formalizing it as input to the fuzzy output system.</p>
      <p>The development will allow the processing of large volumes of court sentences as
training samples for fuzzy inference systems.</p>
      <p>The work was carried out as the part of the research work «Mathematical modeling
of socio-economic processes and systems», the registration number DB05038, at the
Department of System Analysis and Computational Mathematics of "Zaporizhzhia
Polytechnic" National University.
7
of European Court of human rights]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni
V. N. Karazina 1086, 65-68 (2013) (In Ukr.).
4. Lytvyn, V., Vysotska, V., Hrendus, M. Method of data expression from the ukrainian content
based on the ontological approach. Radioelektronika, informatika, upravlinnya 30, 157
(2018).
5. Rakytianska, H. Optymizatsiia spoluchenykh nechitkykh baz znan na pravylakh i
vidnoshenniakh [Optimization of complied fuzzy knowledge based on rules and relations]. Informatsiini
tekhnolohii ta komp`iuterna inzheneriia 1, 17-26 (2015) (In Ukr.).
6. Jaafari, A., Zennerb, E., Panahic, M., Shahabid, H. Hybrid artificial intelligence models based
on a neuro-fuzzy system and metaheuristic optimization algorithms for spatial prediction of
wildfire probability. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 266-267, 198-207 (2019).
7. Neuro-Adaptive Learning and ANFIS,
https://www.mathworks.com/help/fuzzy/neuro-adaptive-learning-and-anfis.html#responsive_%20offcanvas. Last access 2020/02/28.
8. Valkman, Yu., Hala, E. Proektirovanie ontologii dlya pravovoy predmetnoy oblasti na osnove
tekstovogo kontenta s ispolzovaniem nechyotkoy logiki [Designing ontology for a legal
subject area based on textual content using fuzzy logic]. Ontologiya proektirovaniya 2(12),
1939 (2014) (In Russian).
9. Bakurova, A., Tereschenko, E., Filei, Y., Pasichnyk, M., Ropalo, H. Modeling of decision
making ontology. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON
COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (COLINS-2019).</p>
      <p>Vol.1: Main Conference. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2362/paper18.pdf (2019).
10. Bakurova, A., Tereschenko, E., Filei, Y., Pasichnyk, M. Production model for administration
of judicial decisions in the case of theft. EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MACHINE
LEARNING FOR PREDICTION OF EMERGENT ECONOMY DYNAMICS. Proceedings
of the Selected Papers of the 8th International Conference on Monitoring, Modeling &amp;
Management of Emergent Economy (M3E2-EEMLPEED 2019), vol. 2422, pp.284-296. Odessa,
Ukraine. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2422 (2019).
11. Bakurova, A., Pasichnyk, M., Tereschenko, E. Fuzzy Modeling of Verbal Information for
Production Systems. Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries 4(10),
513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30837/2522-9818.2019.10.005 (2019).
12. Kriminalniy kodeks Ukrayiny, (In Ukr.), http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/. Last access 2020/02/28.
13. Сourt decisions register of Ukraine, (In Ukr.), http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua. Last access
2020/02/28.
14. Ore, O. Theory of graphs, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications vol. 38;
270 (1962).
15. Manning, Ch., Raghavan, P.,Schutze, H. Introduction to Information Retrieval, Cambridge
University Press, UK (2008) Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809071 Last
access 2020/02/28.
16. Lande, D. Elementy kompiuternoi linhvistyky v pravovii informatytsi [Elements of
computational linguistics in legal informatics]. NDIIPR, Kyiv (2014) (In Ukr.).
17. Novak, V., Perfyleva, Y., Mochkrozh, Y. Matematicheskie principy nechetkoj logiki
[Mathematical Principles of Fuzzy Logic]. Fizmatlit, Sankt-Peterburg, (2006) (In Russian).
18. Amnesty Law of Ukraine, (In Ukr.),
https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/392/96%D0%B2%D1%80. Last access 2020/02/28.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Von</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zareczka</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Suchenko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          et al.
          <article-title>Yevropejs`ki ta mizhnarodni standarty u sferi sudochynstva [European and international standards in the field of justice] Madoyan</article-title>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kyiv</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
          <article-title>(In Ukr</article-title>
          .).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bryntsev</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          “
          <article-title>Elektronnyi sud” v Ukraini. Dosvid ta perspektyvy [“E-court” in Ukraine</article-title>
          .
          <source>Experience and perspectives] Pravo</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kharkiv</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
          <article-title>(In Ukr</article-title>
          .).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tobota</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Yu.
          <article-title>Poniattia ta kryterii «spravedlyvoho sudovoho rozghliadu» u rishenniakh yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny [Conception and criteria of «fair legal process» in judgements</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>