<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Predicting Judicial Outcomes in the Brazilian Legal System Using Textual Features</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Vithor Gomes Ferreira Bertalan</string-name>
          <email>vbertalan@usp.br</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Evandro Eduardo Seron Ruiz</string-name>
          <email>evandro@usp.br</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Computing and Mathematics, FFCLRP, University of Sa~o Paulo</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>PPG-CA</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>DCM, FFCLRP</addr-line>
          ,
          <institution>University of Sa~o Paulo</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>USP</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The combination of Natural Language Processing and Articial Intelligence for the eld of Law is a growing area, with the potential of radically changing the daily routine of legal professionals. The amount of text generated by those professionals is outstanding, and to this point, still unexplored by Computer Science. One of the most acclaimed research eld covering both knowledge areas is Legal Prediction, in which intelligent systems try to predict speci c judicial characteristics, such as the judicial outcome or the judicial class or a given case. This research intends to create a classi er to predict judicial outcomes in the Brazilian legal system. At rst, we developed a text crawler to retrieve judicial outcomes from the o cial Brazilian electronic legal systems. Afterward, a few judicial subjects were selected, and some of their features were extracted. Later, a set of di erent classi ers was applied to predict the legal considering these textual features.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Legal prediction</kwd>
        <kwd>Digital humanities</kwd>
        <kwd>Arti cial Intelligence and Law</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>1.1</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The combination of Natural Language Processing and Arti cial Computer
Science has been revolutionizing many di erent elds of expertise. Sub elds of
Computer Science, like Natural Language Processing (also known as NLP), have
steadily improved a myriad of professional and scienti c activities. NLP helps
researchers to understand how computers can process and analyze large amounts
of natural language data and their meanings. Even simple NLP mechanisms,
such as dictionaries and word counts, can o er interesting underlying facts that
cannot always be noticeable without e ective processing.</p>
      <p>Law is one of the knowledge areas that are the most dependent on text data.
Millions of legislation workpapers, court decisions, and appeals are produced
daily, and many di erent job specializations, such as lawyers, judges, defendants,
and plainti s, have various necessities that could be supplied by intelligent
systems.</p>
      <p>Over the last years, researchers have been dedicated to predicting judicial
case outcomes using NLP application software and Machine Learning methods
over those textual cases. See Section 1.3 below. However, no research with this
intention has been done in Brazilian Portuguese for Brazilian courts, as of 2019.</p>
      <p>
        Branting et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ] cites that automation of legal reasoning and
problemsolving has been a goal of Computer Science research from its earliest days.
However, according to the author, broad adoption of legal computer systems
never occurred, and Computer Science and law remained a niche research area
with little practical impact.
      </p>
      <p>
        Hyman et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ] point out the Zubulake v. UBS Warburg case, a series of
trials and decisions dealing with what data a litigant must preserve and under
what circumstances the parties must pay for search and production costs, as
a seminal case for AI in Law. According to the authors, this case became a
landmark for the practical applications of the research. This case is mainly about
the inability of the defendant to retrieve hundreds to thousands of emails that
were claimed by the plainti to be relevant to the main issue in the lawsuit.
1.2
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Research Objectives</title>
      <p>As a primary objective, this research intends to develop a framework to predict
judicial outcomes in the Brazilian state of S~ao Paulo Justice Court. The S~ao
Paulo Justice Court is the most signi cant legal court on the planet, considering
the number of cases per year. We believe that designing a predicting model that
o ers consistent results for this judicial court this model could be transferred,
after ne-tuning, to any other court. Firstly, we will develop a text crawler to
retrieve data from the legal outcomes. To pre-process these data, we combine
NLP tools to extract characteristics from the text, selecting what is believed to
be the primary information that can lead to valid predictions. After this step, we
will insert these pre-processed data into machine learning frameworks. Finally,
we evaluate all the methods and their respective results against the real judicial
outcomes of the court.
1.3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Related Works</title>
      <p>
        Recent advancements have signi cantly improved the state-of-the-art in the eld
of legal prediction. In the most in uential work, Aletras et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] have used a
dataset of cases from the European Court of Human Rights, containing cases
that violate Article 3 (Prohibits torture and inhuman and degrading treatment ),
Article 6 (Protects the right to a fair trial ), and Article 8 (Provides a right to
respect for one's private and family life, his home and his correspondence ) of the
Convention. Katz et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ] have used random forests to predict the behavior of
the Supreme Court of the United States.
      </p>
      <p>
        In another in uential research, Sulea et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
        ] have done a similar
investigation, predicting the law area and decisions of the French Supreme Court
using lexical features and support vector machine, SVM. The authors have used
a diachronic collection of rulings from the French Supreme Court (Court de
Cassation, in European French).
      </p>
      <p>
        Recent researches have used machine learning successfully to improve Law
decisions. Gokhale and Fasli [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ] have developed a co-training algorithm to
classify human rights abuses, using SVM and Logistic Regression. Branting et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]
have used hierar-chical attention networks, SVMs, and maximum entropy
classi cations for decision support in administrative adjudication, such and routine
licensing, permitting, immigration, and bene ts decisions. SVMs are also used by
Fornaciari and Poesio [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ] to automatically detect deception, such as defamation
and false testimony, in Italian court cases. Remnits [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
        ] has used Latent Dirichlet
Allocation to discover the main topics of discussion in judicial outcomes of the
United States Supreme Court. Mochales [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
        ] has used argumentation mining to
structure better legal arguments, capturing main issues and evidence of a given
corpus.
      </p>
      <p>
        Not directly related to the scope of legal prediction used in this paper,
some recent research has also been conducted in Brazilian Portuguese. Aires et
al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] have used deontic logic to identify norm con icts in contracts. In contrast,
Araujo, Rigo and Barbosa [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ] have used ontology-based algorithms to classify
legal documents in Brazilian judicial outcomes.
      </p>
      <p>
        Liu and Chen [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
        ] also write that natural language processing and machine
learning have augmented possibilities based on the exploration of semantic of
law and case texts. Also, according to Barraud [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ], NLP and AI have expanded
the limits of justice, transforming it into a predictive, quantitative, statistic, and
simulative justice. As stated by Alarie, Niblett and Yoon [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ], intelligent judicial
systems can not only help lawyers with timely and objective assessments of their
claims but also governments, by using legal classi ers to help evaluate claims and
manage litigation risks.
2
2.1
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>Methodology</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Domain Characterization</title>
      <p>A corpus of judicial sentences, along with their outcomes, was collected from
eSAJ, the electronic system of the S~ao Paulo Justice Court (TJSP). To
restrict the number of documents retrieved, a few previously de ned judicial
subjects were selected, which are: second-degree murder (in Brazilian Portuguese,
homic dio simples ), and active corruption (in Brazilian Portuguese, corrupc~ao
ativa).</p>
      <p>Only subjects with very well de ned outcomes will be selected. As well
de ned outcomes, we intend to choose those judicial outcomes with the
condemnation or absolution of the defendant. Many di erent legal subjects, such
as divorce papers, do not have explicit terms for condemnation or absolution.
Therefore, it is of utmost importance to nd those judicial subjects with clear
and well-established results. We also applied numerical labels to features as
condemnations and to the absolutions. These binary labels are used to develop a
mathematical/statistical model that one may predict the conclusion of the cases
mentioned above based on their textual structure.
2.2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Data Collection</title>
      <p>We have implemented a web text crawler to retrieve data from eSAJ, using
Python. As the user can select from many di erent elds to exhibit the judicial
opinions, such as classes, subjects, judges, and processes numbers, the crawler
must be able to choose from those di erent query choices to compose a raw text
le. The following elds were collected: judicial class, judicial subject, judge,
county, release date, and full text of the judicial sentence.</p>
      <p>In addition to the data collected from the text, additional elds were derived
from the information collected: gender of the judge, and a boolean eld indicating
whether the county was the capital city of S~ao Paulo, or a state city.</p>
      <p>To classify each of the judicial outcomes, we have created the binary labels
for condemnation (+1) and absolution (-1). We have also used the professional
guidance of Brazilian lawyers, with the purpose of better understanding the
texts. The language adopted in the eld of Law worldwide might be notoriously
obscure for a layman.</p>
      <p>The data collection poses a compelling challenge, as the amount of data
displayed on the website of the TJSP is indeed substantial. As of June 1st, 2018,
a simple search for the Brazilian Portuguese correspondent of rape (estupro),
for example, returns 5,658 hits. Another search for the Brazilian Portuguese
term for drug (droga) returns 138,956 hits. Each hit is a judicial opinion of its
own, containing many sentences and text topics. As each judicial class under the
Brazilian law system contains di erent text topics, e.g. the topics in a text from
the class divorce papers (in Brazilian Portuguese, documentos de divorcio) di er
substantially from texts from the class release permits (in Brazilian Portuguese,
alvara de soltura).</p>
      <p>Table 1 illustrates the number of documents retrieved from the eSAJ system.
The data retrieved was pre-processed to remove unnecessary information. We
began by tokenizing the text and eliminating stopwords. For this task, we used
the Natural Language Processing Toolkit in Python, called NTLK. NLTK can
deal with di erent languages other than English, such as Brazilian Portuguese,
which makes this framework a strong candidate for this research. Unusual
characters, such as hyphens or parentheses, were also removed. After those steps, we
have proceeded with the stemming of the resulting text. For the testing rounds,
we used a 10-fold cross validation.
2.4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Data Transformation</title>
      <p>In this step, we transformed the data into a mathematical sequence that can
be passed through machine learning algorithms. We used TFIDF (term
frequency{inverse document frequency) to transform each of the sentences into
numbers that are processed through various machine learning (ML) algorithms.
3
3.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-7-1">
        <title>Preliminary Results</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>Homicides Data Set</title>
      <p>We have already tested the two di erent datasets with various ML methods. The
methods selected were: Logistic Regression (LR), Linear Discriminant Analysis
(LDA), Gaussian Nave Bayes (GNB), K-Neighbor (KN), Support Vector
Machines (SVM) and, Regression Trees (RT). All the tests were initially run by
splitting the training set with 75% of the whole data set, and the test set with
the remaing 25% .</p>
      <p>For the rst data set, the homicides legal texts, we found the calibration
plot in Fig. 1. In calibration plots using Platt Scaling, the closest to the
perfect calibrated curve, the better. Therefore, from this gure, we can infer that
Regression Trees show better results. Support Vector Machines presented the
lowest performance, predicting values very di erently to those that would be
expected based on the reviewed literature.</p>
      <p>At last, we run a k-fold cross validation, with 10 epochs, for each of the
algorithms. The results are shown in Table 2 and Fig. 2. LDA and Linear Regression,
in these tests, were the best choices among all the algorithms.
For the second data set, with the corruption legal texts, we found the
calibration plot shown in Fig. 3. In Platt Scaling, the closest to the perfect calibrated
curve, the better. As the previous results with the Homicides data set, we can
infer that Regression Trees are the best choice. K-Neighbors showed the lowest
performance, predicting values very di erently to those that would be expected.
All the tests were initially run by splitting the training set considering 75% for
the training set and 25% for the test set.</p>
      <p>Those results show that, at least for the two databases being evaluated,
Regression Trees are the best choice for predicting the outcomes of legal texts.
In both data sets, it showed to the the best choice, or being among the best
choices available.
4</p>
      <sec id="sec-8-1">
        <title>Conclusions and Future Steps</title>
        <p>After the tests done, we can infer that Regression Trees are the best method to
predict results in both data sets being analyzed. Even though the other
algorithms showed varying results. SVM, as an example, showed a good performance
in the corruption database, but the lowest value in the homicides database.
Regression Trees have always kept good predicting outcomes. Those results match</p>
        <p>
          Fig. 4. Candlesticks for the algorithms with 10 k-fold
other results found by other researches in the legal area, in many di erent
countries, such as the one conducted by Kastellec [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
          ], who obtained good outcomes
by using Regression Trees in the American legal system. The author mentions
that Regression Trees have the capability of studying legal conceptions of Law,
revealing patterns that other methods cannot emulate as e ectively.
        </p>
        <p>
          Other researchers also used the same method, such as Rios-Figueroa [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
          ],
who used Regression Trees to analyze the concept of judicial independence and
corruption among Supreme Courts in Latin America, Antonucci et.al. [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ], who
adopted Regression Trees to measure the e ciency of Italian courts, and
Kufandirimbwa and Kuranga [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
          ], who used the same method to predict outcomes
in Zimbabwe.
        </p>
        <p>Those researches show that, even though legal systems are extremely di erent
around the world and throughout di erent languages and countries, such as
Brazil, USA, Italy and Zimbabwe, they do have similar characteristics that can
be e ectively measured by the correct algorithms.</p>
        <p>As future steps, we plan to adopt di erent methods of converting word
embeddings into whole texts, so that we can also utilize methods, such as neural
networks, and, eventually, compare these with the ones mentioned in this work.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Aires</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pinheiro</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>De Lima</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Meneguzzi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Norm con ict identi cation in contracts</article-title>
          .
          <source>Arti cial Intelligence and Law</source>
          <volume>25</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <volume>397</volume>
          {
          <fpage>428</fpage>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alarie</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Niblett</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yoon</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>How arti cial intelligence will a ect the practice of law</article-title>
          .
          <source>University of Toronto Law Journal 68(supplement 1)</source>
          ,
          <volume>106</volume>
          {
          <fpage>124</fpage>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Aletras</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tsarapatsanis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Preotiuc-Pietro</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lampos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Predicting judicial decisions of the european court of human rights: A natural language processing perspective</article-title>
          .
          <source>PeerJ Computer Science</source>
          <volume>2</volume>
          ,
          <issue>e93</issue>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Antonucci</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Crocetta</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>D'Ovidio</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Evaluation of Italian Judicial System</article-title>
          .
          <source>Procedia Economics and Finance</source>
          <volume>17</volume>
          (
          <year>September 2015</year>
          ),
          <volume>121</volume>
          {
          <fpage>130</fpage>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-
          <volume>5671</volume>
          (
          <issue>14</issue>
          )
          <fpage>00886</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>7</lpage>
          , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2212-
          <volume>5671</volume>
          (
          <issue>14</issue>
          )
          <fpage>00886</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>7</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5. de Araujo,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.A.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Rigo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.J.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Barbosa</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>J.L.V.</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Ontology-based information extraction for juridical events with case studies in brazilian legal realm</article-title>
          .
          <source>Arti cial Intelligence and Law</source>
          <volume>25</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <volume>379</volume>
          {
          <fpage>396</fpage>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Barraud</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>An algorithm that can predict judges' decisions: Toward a robotization of justice? Les Cahiers de la Justice (1</article-title>
          ),
          <volume>121</volume>
          {
          <fpage>139</fpage>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Branting</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yeh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Weiss</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Merkhofer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brown</surname>
          </string-name>
          , B.:
          <article-title>Inducing predictive models for decision support in administrative adjudication</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: AI</source>
          Approaches to the
          <source>Complexity of Legal Systems: AICOL International Workshops</source>
          <year>2015</year>
          -2017:
          <article-title>AICOL-VI@ JURIX 2015</article-title>
          ,
          <article-title>AICOL-VII@ EKAW 2016</article-title>
          ,
          <article-title>AICOL-VIII@ JURIX 2016</article-title>
          ,
          <article-title>AICOL-IX@ ICAIL 2017, and AICOL-X@ JURIX 2017, Revised Selected Papers</article-title>
          . vol.
          <volume>10791</volume>
          , p.
          <fpage>465</fpage>
          . Springer (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fornaciari</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Poesio</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Automatic deception detection in italian court cases</article-title>
          .
          <source>Arti cial intelligence and law</source>
          <volume>21</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <volume>303</volume>
          {
          <fpage>340</fpage>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gokhale</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fasli</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Deploying a co-training algorithm to classify human-rights abuses</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: 2017 International Conference on the Frontiers and Advances in Data Science (FADS)</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>108</volume>
          {
          <fpage>113</fpage>
          .
          <string-name>
            <surname>IEEE</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hyman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sincich</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Will</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Agrawal</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Padmanabhan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fridy</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>A process model for information retrieval context learning and knowledge discovery</article-title>
          .
          <source>Arti cial Intelligence and Law</source>
          <volume>23</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <volume>103</volume>
          {
          <fpage>132</fpage>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kastellec</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>The Statistical Analysis of Judicial Decisions and Legal Rules with Classi cation Trees</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Empirical Legal Studies</source>
          <volume>7</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <volume>202</volume>
          {
          <fpage>230</fpage>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-
          <fpage>1461</fpage>
          .
          <year>2010</year>
          .
          <volume>01176</volume>
          .x
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Katz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bommarito</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>II</surname>
          </string-name>
          , J.B.:
          <article-title>A general approach for predicting the behavior of the supreme court of the united states</article-title>
          .
          <source>PloS one 12(4)</source>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kufandirimbwa</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kuranga</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Towards Judicial Data Mining : Arguing for Adoption in the Judicial System 1(2</article-title>
          ),
          <volume>15</volume>
          {
          <fpage>21</fpage>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
          </string-name>
          , H.:
          <article-title>A predictive performance comparison of machine learning models for judicial cases</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: 2017 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI)</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>1</volume>
          {
          <issue>6</issue>
          .
          <string-name>
            <surname>IEEE</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mochales</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Moens</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Argumentation mining</article-title>
          .
          <source>Arti cial Intelligence and Law</source>
          <volume>19</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <volume>1</volume>
          {
          <fpage>22</fpage>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Remmits</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.L.J.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Finding the topics of case law: Latent dirichlet allocation on supreme court decisions</article-title>
          . B.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sc</surname>
          </string-name>
          .,
          <source>Faculteit der Sociale Wetenschappen (7</source>
          <year>2017</year>
          ), supervisors: Kachergis,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.E.</given-names>
            ;
            <surname>Kuppevelt</surname>
          </string-name>
          , D. van ; Dijck, G. van
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          17.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rios-Figueroa</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <source>Judicial Independence and Corruption: An Analysis of Latin America. SSRN Electronic Journal (212)</source>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          ). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.912924
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          18.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sulea</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zampieri</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vela</surname>
          </string-name>
          , M.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>van Genabith</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Predicting the law area and decisions of french supreme court cases</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>RANLP</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2017</year>
          . pp.
          <volume>716</volume>
          {
          <issue>722</issue>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>