<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>e-Government of Intelligent Information Society?</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Han-Seong Kim</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Future IT Innovation Laboratory, Pohang University of Science and Technology 77</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Cheongam-ro, Nam-gu, Pohang-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do</addr-line>
          ,
          <country>Republic of</country>
          <addr-line>Korea 37673</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>17</fpage>
      <lpage>21</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>e-Government shows the evolutionary mechanism of coevolution in information technology and society. The key means to achieve this are intelligent information technologies that include AI, IoT, big data, and cloud computing. In other words, the new e-government is one in which intelligent customized services have evolved through disruptive innovation in terms of intelligent information technology and social coevolution. For a discussion on new e-government, this study analyzed the trends of major countries including the US, the UK, and Canada, along with the opinions of international organizations including the OECD and Gartner. It also analyzed the strategy of the e-Government 2020 basic plan and drew implications based on it. Local e-governments that conform to the new e-government direction are premised on the continuous creation of services that satisfy local residents. To this end, there is a need for changes in e-government governance, establishment of a shared information/service platform created by local residents, cloud-based integration/redesign of local government administrative systems, and advancement into the global local e-government market are required.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>e-Governance</kwd>
        <kwd>Intelligent information society</kwd>
        <kwd>Intelligent information technology</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1 Introduction</title>
      <p>Today, as society becomes more interdependent and complex due to the Internet and
globalization, uncertainty is very high and disruptive innovation is taking place with
technological change that occurs at a faster rate than ever before. It is therefore important
to quickly and appropriately predict social change, and to prepare for it wisely at the
national level. Accordingly, informatization innovation strategies for governments based
on ICT (information and communications technologies) have been actively pursued,
with an evolution in goals and methods according to social demands.</p>
      <p>The e-government of the Republic of Korea reached its 50th anniversary amid such
changes, a period of five decades of achievements and changes where tremendous
progress has been made. Since the first introduction of computers for administrative use
by the Economic Planning Board in 1967, citizen complaint services and the like over 50
years have not only improved the quality of life of the people, but improved productivity
and transparency of administrative affairs through the computerization of government
affairs. Companies have also made great leaps forward in supporting corporate
competitiveness in areas such as speeding up export customs and the introduction of electronic
procurement through bringing corporate services online.</p>
      <p>
        Specifically, South Korean e-government achieved a leap forward as an exporting
country with an ICT-based administrative system. In the biannual e-government
evaluation by UN DESA (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs)
conducted on 190 member countries, Korea has achieved first place three times since
2010 [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]1. Its network readiness index, ICT development index, and public data
utilization index in particular show a level surpassing that of advanced countries such
as the United States. Korean e-government system is considered to have made a great
contribution to the efficiency and democratization of the state administration [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5 ref6">5,6</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Social change through the implementation of e-government is developing into a
coevolutionary relationship that develops with mutual influence through the role of
supply and demand. The view of society in the future presents new social needs, and
these social needs are leading to new forms of governments. In addition, in the process
of responding to the technological outlook and social demands necessary for the society
of the future, promotion strategies for informatization policy and a system in which
tasks are prepared and implemented are being naturally formed. A government-wide
response to this could be a driving force to enhance national competitiveness and lead
social development.</p>
      <p>This study thus seeks to examine the mechanism and social/technological
environmental changes following the evolution of e-government in Korea, and to suggest a new
concept and direction for it.
2</p>
      <p>
        e-Governance
E-government was introduced to improve the satisfaction of public administration
services by using ICT technology to quickly and accurately carry out government
administration and decrease government budgets, increase administrative efficiency, and provide
high-quality public administration services to the public [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Since the latter half of the 1980s, the Korean government has established an
egovernment development strategy to provide the world’s best e-government services.
In order to realize a government that responds to the public’s administrative needs and
communicates with the public, the Basic Plan for Mobile e-Government for Realization
of an Advanced Administrative Country was established in October 2010, and the
Smart e-Government Promotion Plan was announced in March 2011 for next-generation
e-government strategy [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref3">1,3</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        The 2020 e-Government Basic Plan was established in an effort to respond to the
rapidly changing e-government environment and to overcome challenges that include
1 According to United Nations e-government evaluation results, Korean e-government ranking
was first in 2010, 2012, and 2014, and third in 2016 and 2018 [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ].
increasingly complex and difficult social issues, the development of intelligent
information technology, the demands for reinforcement of integrated services tailored to the
people, and the enhancement of the role of e-government leadership in the international
community. Through the 2020 e-Government Basic Plan, a vision of “e-Government
that brings joy to the people with new digital experiences” was established, from which
three goals were set for its implementation: Citizen Experience, Intelligent Government,
and a Digital New Deal, from which the ENJOY five-part implementation strategy was
prepared2;3.
      </p>
      <p>
        In order to overcome these limitations, e-government must evolve into a new smart
e-government. The OECD (2014) refers to e-government of the future as a digital
government, explained as “government that uses digital technology as an integral part of
its modernization strategy to help various stakeholders promote the production of data,
content and services between and within the government4.” While e-government viewed
the provision of services as the extent of its scope, digital government emphasizes that
even when a service is provided, its scope then extends to receiving feedback on service
results which is used to lead to improvement and change in an operation extending to
the entire life cycle of the service. Digital government defines itself as a data-oriented
government based on cloud, mobile, and social network technologies, with change
management and governance described as larger challenges compared to the days of
e-government [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. A comparison between e-government and digital government is shown
in Table 1.
      </p>
      <p>The future e-government represented by digital government has values oriented on
democracy and sustainability and focuses on digitization and openness, and can said
to be an e-government based on intelligent information technologies that include AI,
IoT, big data, and cloud technologies. In addition, it is a government that provides
intelligent personalized services in an evolving form through disruptive innovation in
terms of technology and social coevolution, in a process of which it is a government that
creates a sustainable environment in which an ecosystem is built in which governments,
enterprises, non-profit organizations and individuals cooperate.</p>
      <p>
        E-government policy of the past can be said to be focused on efficiency and
transparency through the informatization of administrative affairs using items such as
information systems and the Internet, as well as boosting online administrative services for
the public. In the future, intelligent information technologies such as AI, mobile, IoT,
big data and cloud must be utilized as core means to develop into an on-demand5 digital
2 https://www.mois.go.kr/frt/bbs/type010/commonSelectBoardArticle.do?
bbsId=BBSMSTR_000000000008&amp;nttId=48976
3 The five major strategies making up the ENJOY acronym for e-Government 2020 are: (1)
Enhancement of the digital experience, (2) New building of an intelligent government, (3)
Joining an e-government ecosystem, (4) Organizing trust infrastructure, and (5) saying Yes to a
global e-government [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ].
4 The concept of digital government advocates one that is distinct from existing e-government,
which emphasized the efficiency of work within the government and the quality of public
service.
5 The mobile trend keyword ‘on-demand’ refers to a way to provide necessary goods and services
at any time according to consumer needs. Various on-demand services such as Uber, Airbnb
and Kakao Taxi have already been provided in the private sector.
government tailored to the people that responds immediately to their needs. In line with
these changes, the government has set personalized policy promotion on the corporate
and personal level as a national task, in which both central government administrative
agencies and local governments strive to discover and provide personalized services for
the people, consumers, and individuals. However, this has for the most part pertained
to gathering citizen opinions, living guides, and tourist information services. The
provision of truly customized administrative services requires efforts for an expansion of
private and public cooperation in the social, economic, political and administrative fields
through intelligent information technology in order to achieve governmental innovation
and sustainable development.
3
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>Society is transforming into an intelligent information society through an innovative
ICTbased convergence/complex revolution, where ICBMS6 technology is internalized within
it and acts as a new growth engine that drives innovative changes between technology
and the people that live in it. A new future-oriented e-government can only be built
once the direction of e-government development has gone through a process in which
technology, society, and the people develop together. The concept and characteristics
of e-government that the government should pursue can be said to be the convergence
of digital technologies based on cooperation between all actors involved including
government, people, and enterprises, for a government that digitally provides the services
that people want, without restrictions for time, location, and device. The government
should thus build a future-oriented e-government using the new technology known as
intelligent information technology.
6 An acronym derived from the terms IoT, Cloud, Big data, Mobile, and Security.</p>
      <p>The future e-government model aims to realize sustainable development of society
as a whole through a 100% digitization of government services, through which
databased administrative services, disruptive innovation strategies, and support for
customerbased value creation can be achieved. In order to pursue this vision and strategy, the
establishment of a cloud-based future administrative work environment and an integrated
government service window is first needed.</p>
      <p>In addition, in order to realize this, there is an urgent need for laws and regulations
related to e-government, a reorganization of civic consciousness, culture and institutions
that lag behind the times, and a strengthening of digital capabilities. In order to realize
a future-oriented e-government, it is necessary to develop a new technology-based
electronic public service with a greater scope by setting the foundation to provide life
cycle and personalized services and redesigning e-government towards one centered
on data. In future studies, surveys and in-depth interviews of policy actors and policy
users should be conducted along with an in-depth study of the direction of e-government
through analysis of overseas cases.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <article-title>Smart gov plan (draft) to realize the world's best e-government to become one with the people</article-title>
          .
          <source>Tech. rep., Ministry of the Interior and Safety of Republic of Korea</source>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <article-title>Recommendation of the council on digital government strategies</article-title>
          .
          <source>Tech. rep., Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)</source>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3. e-Government 2020
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Basic</given-names>
            <surname>Plan</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <source>Tech. rep., Ministry of Government Administration of Republic of Korea</source>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>UN</surname>
          </string-name>
          e-Government
          <string-name>
            <surname>Surveys</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          ), https://publicadministration.un.org/en/ research/un-e
          <string-name>
            <surname>-</surname>
          </string-name>
          government-surveys
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kim</surname>
          </string-name>
          , S.T.:
          <article-title>Smart society e-policy &amp; e-Gov. : theory &amp; stratergy</article-title>
          .
          <source>Bobmunsa</source>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kim</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kim</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.S.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>A study on the classification of the quality of e-government service using the kano model : Focusing on civil servants and citizens</article-title>
          .
          <source>Korean Journal of Policy Analysis and Evaluation</source>
          <volume>25</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>235</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>258</lpage>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Oh</surname>
          </string-name>
          , K.T.:
          <article-title>E-government international expert debate (2015), (Presentation material)</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Osborne</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gaebler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Reinventing Government: The Five Strategies for Reinventing Government</article-title>
          .
          <source>PLUME (Feb</source>
          <year>1993</year>
          ), https://www.ebook.de/de/product/3301700/ david_osborne
          <article-title>_ted_gaebler_reinventing_government_the_five_strategies_ for_reinventing_government</article-title>
          .html
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>