<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Comparative Analysis of E-Democracy Implementation in Ukraine and Switzerland</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Ivan Franko National University of Lviv</institution>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Lviv Polytechnic National University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Lviv</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>0000</fpage>
      <lpage>0001</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>This article provides a comparative analysis of the implementation of e-democracy in Ukraine and Switzerland. The main stages of e-democracy development in these two countries are studied. Key facts from the history of edemocracy in Switzerland and Ukraine are presented. The advantages and disadvantages of implementing e-democracy in Ukraine and Switzerland are compared and analyzed. Having considered the experience of implementing edemocracy in Switzerland, a set of methods and measures to be implemented in Ukraine is proposed: to develop an open data portal, to introduce electronic identification of citizens, to establish effective e-communication between government and citizens by improving existing forms of e-democracy, i.e. petitions, complaints, and the introduction of new ones, such as Swiss forums and blogs, to improve the existing system of web-based means of interaction between government and citizens.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Comparative Analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>E-Democracy</kwd>
        <kwd>Implementation</kwd>
        <kwd>Ukraine</kwd>
        <kwd>Switzerland</kwd>
        <kwd>E-communication</kwd>
        <kwd>Web-Based Means</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>The concept of “e-democracy” is considered in two senses. When we talk about
edemocracy in the narrow sense, we mean the use of information and communication
technologies to ensure (electronic support) the rights of citizens. In this case, only the
technological side of submitting applications, appeals, and inquiries to the authorities
on behalf of citizens’ changes is changed. That is, using his legal right to receive a
certain certificate, a citizen can apply to the court in writing, or, for example, using
email. E-democracy in a broad sense involves the involvement of the community
through modern information technology in solving various socio-political problems. It
is in this context that we will consider e-democracy. An example is the interactive
participation of residents in a local council meeting. During the broadcast of the
meeting on the Internet, everyone interested can express their attitude to the decisions of
the council, the speeches of deputies, and thus to influence the stance of the authority.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Stages of development of e-democracy in Ukraine</title>
      <p>The first stage (2000–2001) had a preparatory character: the most general aspects of
the use of modern ICT were determined; the necessary basis for further actions of the
state in this direction was formed.</p>
      <p>The second stage II (2002–2003) was directly related to the formation of
egovernment mechanisms in Ukraine, which aimed to increase the efficiency and
transparency of public authorities and local governments, improve public awareness
of the activities of these bodies and enhance feedback between government and
society through the Internet.</p>
      <p>The third stage III began in 2003 with the adoption of the resolution “On
measures to create an electronic information system “Electronic Government”
(February 24, 2003 № 208) by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. The objectives of the
proposed measures for the development of the information society were to provide
citizens and legal entities with information and other services through the use of
electronic information system “Electronic Government”, which provides information
interaction between executive authorities and citizens, provides information and other
services based on modern information technologies.
3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>History of e-democracy in Switzerland</title>
      <p>The emergence of e-democracy in Switzerland (Table 1) began in 2003.
11. April, 2018
12. June, 2018
13. September, 2018
14. October, 2018
15. June, 2019
16. September, 2019
17. October, 2019</p>
      <p>Beginning of VAT declaration on the Internet
Establishment of the joint-stock company
"eOperationsSwitzerland".</p>
      <p>The Federal Council adopted the Digital
Switzerland strategy for the next 2 years
Development of a "virtual rural area"
Presentation of the e-government strategy for
20202023 entitled "digital first"
The Law "On Electronic Identification" was
adopted
More than 50% of Swiss can use "electronic
movement"</p>
      <p>The national strategy, adopted in January 2007, aims to enable businesses and the
public to interact with the authorities in electronic format. The government, in turn,
modernizes its own business processes.</p>
      <p>At the end of the programming period 2008-2015, 59 projects were approved. Of
these, 27 have been completed and 32 are still being implemented.</p>
      <p>The beginning of the "electronic course" started in 2016. The introduction of
eservices took place first in the canton of Zurich, then in the city of St. Gallen, and by
the end of the year -was introduced in many municipalities in Zurich. Also in 2016,
the Canton of Jura together with the Canton of Friborg created the conditions for
various authorities, using the infrastructure of the e-government portal.</p>
      <p>In January 2017, a lexicon on e-government legal issues was developed, which
provided comprehensive documentation on e-government legal issues.Since January
2017, the signature validator has been working in the cantonal and municipal
authorities and in the Zug administrative court. This allows individuals and companies to
verify the authenticity and integrity of digitally signed PDF documents. In October
2017, Federal Adviser Wally Maurer signed the Tallinn Declaration on
eGovernment. Therefore, Switzerland emphasizes the importance of e-government in
Switzerland. In November 2017, the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs SECO
reached an important milestone in the strategic project "Business Transaction Portal"
with the launch of EasyGov.swiss. Thus, companies can communicate online with the
authorities of the federal government, cantons and municipalities through a single
access. The offers of the portal are constantly expanding. The Office of e-Government
and the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs SECO published the first national
eGovernment survey in November 2017. Surveys of the population, business and
government are central to the monitoring of e-government in Switzerland. From the
beginning of April 2018, downloading an XML invoice with VAT became possible
through the ESTV Suisse Tax portal. VAT can be charged electronically. In June
2018, the Swiss Conference on Computer Science (SIK) established eOperations
Switzerland with the consent of the Confederation and the cantons to develop and
operate IT solutions for the digitization of public services by the federal government,
cantons and municipalities. The Federal Council adopted the Digital Switzerland
strategy on September 5, 2018. The Digital Switzerland Strategy 2018 sets out the
desired goals and guidelines for digitization in all important areas of life. In October
2018, modules for citizen participation in social and political processes, the so-called
"virtual rural area" were created. n June 2018, the Steering Committee of the
Confederation, Cantons and Municipalities of e-Government of Switzerland presented the
eGovernment Strategy for 2020-2023 for consultations. The strategy aims to establish
an electronic channel as the main choice in business relations between citizens and the
government, guided by the principle of "digital first". On September 27, 2019, the
parliament adopted the Federal Law "On Electronic Identification". The Swiss
population will be able to continue to receive online services from the authorities and
companies in the future. Often annoying new registration is no longer required, it is
enough to confirm your identity. By October 2019, 13 cantons had joined the
eUmzugCH solution. This means that more than half of Swiss residents can easily
register and cancel their registration with the municipality when switching to the
eumzug.swiss portal.</p>
      <p>Unlike other European countries, the implementation of e-democracy in
Switzerland is a long and difficult process. Comparison and analysis of the benefits of
implementing e-democracy in Ukraine and Switzerland First, let us analyze the
implementation of e-democracy in Ukraine. E-government, by definition of researchers
Solovyov and Danylenko, is a technology of e-democracy, that is why it is important
to consider the functioning of e-government in Ukraine.</p>
      <p>According to the Government portal (https://www.kmu.gov.ua/services), the
following electronic services are provided in Ukraine in various fields:
1. Sphere of health care and education:
 medical institutions: the electronic map of places of provision contains information
on places of provision - with addresses and telephone numbers, distribution of
institutions by oblasts, indications of the number of declarations for each doctor, etc.
(Fig. 2);
 educational institutions (Fig. 3);
 verification of documents: on education, student;
 e-health: checking the legitimacy of a medical certificate in the Unified State
Database of Medical Examinations of Certain Categories of Persons in the Health Care
System;
2. Sphere of security and court:
 police: providing various certificates, as well as the ability to check the phone
number in the database;
 state registration of vehicles: in particular, the electronic driver's office (Fig. 5),
there is a service for passing tests on knowledge of traffic rules;
3. Finance and taxes: provision of certificates, extracts from registers;
4. Judicial system: provision of certificates, also, citizens have the opportunity to
apply to the court online;
5. Sphere of transport;
6. Sphere of entrepreneurship:
 issuance of permits;
 business licensing: obtaining licenses;
 business registration;
 providing certificates and extracts from registers;
7. Citizenship and migration: registration of passport documents (Fig. 6), provision of
citizenship services to foreign citizens;
8. Sphere of land and ecology: issuance of special permits, declarations, various
information in this area (Fig. 7);
9. Sphere of construction and real estate;
10. Social protection: provision of certificates, registration of social assistance,
pensions and other services.
 round-the-clock access to e-democracy tools. Earlier, people needed traditional
media or they had to read newspapers or go to public hearings, or general meetings
in the city hall, which was significantly time consuming. Now the latest technology
provides round-the-clock access from a computer or even a mobile phone;
 transparency of the use of e-tools: e-access increases transparency, because people
constantly have access to information;
 social inclusion: by providing information with tools, people are directly or
indirectly involved in a political sphere that becomes more open to society. This is
very convenient for certain categories of the population, for example, for people
with disabilities, the elderly, etc.;
 opportunity to express an opinion without intermediaries. Now citizens can directly
participate in voting for an electronic petition online, send an e-complaint. That is,
it is an exemption from intermediaries - no one acts between a citizen and an
executive, for example, a politician;
 e-democracy as a tool to fight corruption, because the human factor is excluded.</p>
      <p>For example, when receiving a certain electronic service, when a citizen
downloads a form from a computer or state source, the services of a third party are no
longer required to provide this form;
 collective intelligence and cooperation of citizens - information and
communication technologies allow us to be more effective in cooperation and achieve more
effective results.
3.2</p>
      <p>Advantages of e-democracy in Switzerland:
 convenience. Electronic voting is a method of voting independent of place and
time;
 increasing participation. Electronic voting offers alternative electronic tools to
people who do not have the opportunity to vote in the traditional way,
 reduction of process costs. After e-voting, after building the infrastructure and
accepting the high investment cost, the cost will be redeemed in a few years, and
the cost of the process will be lower compared to traditional voting channels, such
as polls or postal ballots;
 increasing efficiency due to more accurate organization of electronic voting,
prevention of mistakes and falsification;
 the introduction of the smartvote system provides not only electronic voting, but
also an innovative and simple way of informing voters, becoming the main source
of elections;
 maximum proximity of the state and citizens. A clear example of this is the blog of
former Swiss Confederation President Moritz Levenberger;
 access to open data of the Swiss government through the national portal OGD
opendata.swiss (has been operating since 2016). It provides shared public access to
open, i.e. freely used state data;
 thanks to the developed Internet portal of election and voting results, as well as the
creation of an interactive map, e-services such as “visualization of election results”
have become available to citizens, and the voting process has become simpler;
 maximum involvement of citizens in solving state issues: before the adoption of
laws, amendments to laws, etc. For example, residents of 3 cantons of Switzerland
(Zug, Schwyz, Graubünden) have the opportunity not only to vote for a bill, but
also to see voting results via the online portal (Fig. 8).
 with the help of the eumzug.swiss web application (it has been operating since
2017), citizens have the opportunity to report electronically about movements,
relocations within cantons and countries (Fig. 9). You can also use this web
application to report the movement of dogs;
 in order to improve the usability of official websites, the Federal Office created the
concept of "Electronic public access at home and abroad to the services of the
Swiss authorities" in 2016-2019. That is, through various forums the authority
bodies communicate with citizens, for example, the forum "ch.ch" answers about 13
million users’ questions a year;
 an electronic service such as a “digital vehicle identifier” which helps to track the
vehicle in many administrative processes is also available;
 the open-source Ki-Tax program has been in effect since March 2017 and allows
families to apply for financial support for child care;
 using Chabot, the city of St. Gallen offers residents and tourists access to
information and services from the administration. By the end of 2018, various topics
had been demonstrated in the chat. These include a calendar of events, parking
information, mobility information request, and use of eUmzugCH, departure
information request and feedback input;
 thanks to the e-participation module for citizens, Swiss municipalities establish
ecommunication with communities. This is similar to the Ukrainian form of
edemocracy, i.e. electronic petitions, but much more perfect;
 it is interesting to introduce conversational e-government - voice assistants, who,
for example, inform residents about the date of waste removal;
 with the help of block chain technology, citizens are provided with the service of
electronic identification (identification) and electronic signature;
 citizens are provided with access to geo data and metadata through the interactive
map viewer map.geo.admin.ch and the geodienste.ch geo data portal (Fig. 10);
 the Federal Administration has been able to position itself as a center of
competence for electronic invoices in Switzerland, as evidenced by the fact that there are
about 700 million invoices in Switzerland every month, and paper invoices are
almost never used;
 with the help of IDV, citizens can enter the applications of different authorities
with the same login information. This allows, for example, registration in the
municipal web application to apply for childcare subsidies outside the family with
data on the registration of the cantonal tax portal;
 in the case of many administrative proceedings, such as the collection of military
dues or insurance premiums or the collection of debts, the responsible authority
shall contact the person in writing. To do this, they need the current address. This
issue has been resolved in Switzerland through the establishment of a national
address service;
 electronic service "search for real estate by AHV number will help in the future to
identify people by this number.</p>
      <p>The most common forms of e-democracy in our country include e-appeals, public
budgets, e-consultations, e-petitions. It is worth noting that open data resources also
function, but they still need to be improved.</p>
      <p>Instead, Switzerland has a National e-Government Strategy. This strategy was
developed in close cooperation with representatives of cantons and municipalities, under
the leadership of FSUIT. The strategy lays the groundwork for the Confederation, the
cantons and the municipalities to focus on common goals.</p>
      <p>In Switzerland, the emphasis is placed on round-the-clock access to public
information, the introduction of the principles of efficiency and remote nature of public
administration, primarily due to the lack of queues for administrative services and
cooperation with the private sector (business structures).</p>
      <p>In Switzerland, likewise in Ukraine, in accordance with the Convention on the
National Cyber Administration Strategy approved by the Federal Council in 2015, the
current phase of the cyber administration strategy is aimed at creating an electronic
identity card, and among the most important sectors is the ability to notify about the
change of addresses and electronic registration of VAT tax deduction for commercial
companies.</p>
      <p>In Ukraine, in connection with the introduction of biometric passports (ID-cards),
the idea of remote provision of public administration competence (regarding the
issuance of public administration acts, payment of taxes) seems reasonable. Introduction
of electronic parking tickets by local governments, etc.) also seems appropriate. The
aspect of financing e-democracy reform deserves special attention. In Switzerland, the
National Cyber Administration Strategy is funded by the Confederation and the
cantons on an equal footing in the total amount of 5 million francs per year (but the
budget for 2016-2019 was halved, and under the loan for economic development, the
parliament approved the allocation of funds in the amount of 17 million 700 thousand
francs for the next 4 years) . Such a budget will help create a single window for small
and medium enterprises. For Ukraine, the practice of providing loans or grants for the
implementation of reforms in the field of e-government and e-democracy is extremely
relevant, given the difficult political and socio-economic situation.</p>
      <p>Overall, the average voter turnout in Switzerland is 43%, 75% of Swiss people use
the Internet to interact with public authorities, and 65% of Swiss companies use the
Internet to obtain information from the government. Consider the example of e-voting
in the process of implementing e-democracy in Switzerland.</p>
      <p>Electronic voting in Switzerland began in 2003 in the canton of Geneva, where
residents of Agnes voted online. This was the first e-voting trial in Switzerland. In the
following years, the number of people who were able to use electronic voting
increased as more and more cantons began to adopt such a system.</p>
      <p>The Swiss government has several reasons for using electronic voting. This can
reduce costs and increase the speed of counting ballots. Swiss residents “on board” are
able to vote more reliably. It may also help increase voter turnout (declining since the
1970s), as online voting is considered more convenient by the majority. The country
uses several electronic voting systems, including CHVote (open source software
developed by Geneva) and sVote (from Swiss Post, proprietary software developed by
Scytl).</p>
      <p>Electronic voting (e-voting) allows citizens to participate in elections regardless of
time and location, using a smartphone, computer or tablet. To vote, the Swiss must
register on a special website (https://smartvote.ch/), indicating their individual code,
which they receive by mail along with other documents required for voting (Fig. 11).
Then you need to select the desired candidate or party list and confirm your vote,
which will be encrypted and sent to the e-mail ballot box.
After that, next to the name and surname of the selected candidate (s) one can see
verification codes, which are compiled specifically for each encrypted vote. That is,
each voter receives separate control codes designed specifically for him, which can be
compared with the codes sent on sheets of paper by mail. If all the numbers on the
electronic media and paper match, it means that the electronic vote was saved without
various manipulations. Otherwise, it is necessary to interrupt the voting and apply to
the electoral commission.</p>
      <p>It is also worth noting that Switzerland now uses an improved version of electronic
voting - "smart vote".</p>
      <p>Instead, in Ukraine such a form of e-democracy as electronic voting has not yet
been introduced, as it requires significant funds and improvement of the protection
system, although the first steps have already been taken, i.e. biometric passports in the
form of ID-cards have been introduced, as well as electronic digital signatures, and
electoral lists.</p>
      <p>That is, having analyzed and compared the benefits of e-democracy in Switzerland
and Ukraine, the following conclusions can be drawn:
─ Ukrainian e-government is in a less advantageous position in comparison with the
e-government of Switzerland, because in Switzerland the principle of "maximum
openness of power to citizens" really works. In Ukraine, unfortunately, many
projects still remain in the "project" stage, but the main difference is that Ukraine has
only just begun to implement mechanisms and tools for electronic interaction
between government and citizens, built on the principle of "openness", which would
prevent various corruption and bureaucracy processes. That is, Ukraine, despite the
rapid development of e-government over the past 4 years, still needs to improve
much to get closer to the level of Switzerland;
─ regarding e-democracy, the advantage is again on the side of Switzerland, because
in Ukraine citizens do not have the opportunity to participate in e-voting, do not
participate in e-voting for the adoption or rejection of certain bills, there are not
any e-forums where one could openly address questions to a certain politician.
However, in Switzerland, such electronic means of democracy are quite accessible
to citizens.
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Comparison and analysis of the shortcomings of the implementation of e-democracy in Ukraine and Switzerland</title>
      <p>Among the disadvantages of the introduction of e-democracy in Ukraine are the
following (Fig. 12):
─ low level of involvement of the Ukrainians in e-government, lack of digital
literacy;
─ the problem of "digital inequality" among citizens;
─ failures in the work of information and communication systems as a result of the
lack of proper testing of software products and intensive implementation of
edemocracy mechanisms;
─ the presence of threats to security in the information sphere, including Russia's
propaganda and information war against our state, which may be manifested
through various falsifications;
─ lack of accountability mechanism in case of abuses or falsifications in the
application of e-democracy mechanisms;
─ problems with using e-petitions, namely: imperfect interface, complex user
registration procedure, no information about the features of the site, etc .;
─ the use of e-petitions as a tool for manipulating public consciousness by the
authorities;
─ high cost of implementing e-democracy mechanisms, in addition, it is necessary to
allocate funds from the state budget;
─ low level of efficiency of e-democracy application, due to low level of digital
literacy of citizens, and development of information and communication technologies;
─ lack of reliability, full protection, resulting in various threats to the introduction of
e-democracy.</p>
      <p>Disadvantages of implementing e-democracy in Switzerland.
1. Disadvantages of the electronic voting system:
─ high investment costs. After all, the development of e-voting infrastructure is
expensive because it includes computers, setting up servers, hiring experts and
purchasing software. Estimates suggest that the introduction of e-voting across the
country will cost between 400 and 600 million Swiss francs;
─ complexity and lack of transparency. Electronic voting is a very complex process
that requires expertise to fully understand it. For this reason, only a few work in the
system, on which every citizen depends and whom they trust. Thus, the whole
system can be interpreted by the community as a "black box" that minimizes
transparency and undermines trust;
─ security. A significant disadvantage of electronic voting is the low level of
protection, as there is no one hundred percent guarantee of non-interference;
─ quality of voting. Political parties are taking advantage of new opportunities to
advertise and spread their message online at low cost. For users, this can lead to
information overload and confusion about the origin of information, as well as
reduced political debate and interaction between e-voters;
─ many electronic services are in the process of being finalized, which means that
citizens do not have full access to a particular service.</p>
      <p>The main shortcomings of the implementation of e-democracy, both in Ukraine and in
Sweden are attributed to the following main problems: lack of funds for the
implementation of certain e-democracy projects (Switzerland is now solving this problem
by creating a company), inability to implement projects due to computer
imperfections, computer technologies and others.
5</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Having analyzed the experience of implementing e-democracy in Switzerland, it is
advisable to take the following measures in Ukraine:
─ to develop an open data portal from which citizens could obtain information,
including state information. Perhaps in this way we will take a step towards reducing
bureaucracy and corruption;
─ to introduce electronic identification of a citizen, so that the user will not need to
register every time in order to receive a certain public service online,;
─ to establish effective e-communication between government and citizens by
improving existing forms of e-democracy i.e. petitions, complaints, and the
introduction of new ones, for example, such as Swiss forums and blogs. However, it is
necessary to overcome the secrecy of the government, to make it as open and
transparent as possible;
─ to improve the existing system of web-based means of interaction between
government and citizens.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Parvez</surname>
            , Zahid, and
            <given-names>Pervaiz</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ahmed</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>"Towards building an integrated perspective on edemocracy</article-title>
          .
          <source>" Information, Community &amp; Society 9.5</source>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ):
          <fpage>612</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>632</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Böhlen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Michael</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al., eds. E-Government: Towards Electronic Democracy: International Conference, TCGOV 2005, Bolzano, Italy, March 2-
          <issue>4</issue>
          ,
          <year>2005</year>
          , Proceedings. Vol.
          <volume>3416</volume>
          . Springer,
          <year>2005</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Melnykova</surname>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Buchyn</surname>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Albota</surname>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fedushko</surname>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kashuba</surname>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <article-title>The Special Ways for Processing Personalized Data During Voting in Elections</article-title>
          . In: Shakhovska N.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Medykovskyy</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </string-name>
          . (eds) Advances
          <source>in Intelligent Systems and Computing IV. CCSIT 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing</source>
          , vol
          <volume>1080</volume>
          . Springer, Cham. pp.
          <fpage>781</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>791</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-
          <fpage>030</fpage>
          -33695-0_
          <fpage>52</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Loundy</surname>
          </string-name>
          , David J.
          <article-title>"E-Law 4: Computer Information Systems Law and System Operator Liability."</article-title>
          <source>Seattle UL Rev</source>
          .
          <volume>21</volume>
          (
          <year>1997</year>
          ):
          <fpage>1075</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chappelet</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kilchenmann</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Interactive tools for e-democracy: Examples from Switzerland."</article-title>
          <source>International Conference on e-Government</source>
          . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp.
          <fpage>36</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>47</lpage>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Peixoto</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Tiago.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>"e-Participatory Budgeting: e-Democracy from theory to success?."</article-title>
          <source>Available at SSRN</source>
          <volume>1273554</volume>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Peart</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Michael N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and Javier Ramos Diaz.
          <article-title>"Comparative project on local e-democracy initiatives in Europe</article-title>
          and
          <source>North America." Research Centre on Direct Democracy</source>
          , Faculty of Law, University of Geneva, available at: http://edc. unige. ch/download/ESF (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Moreira</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Ana</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Maria</surname>
          </string-name>
          , et al. "
          <string-name>
            <surname>E-Society and</surname>
          </string-name>
          e-democracy.
          <source>"</source>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bohlen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , et al.
          <article-title>E-government: towards electronic democracy</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Conference proceedings TCGOV</source>
          .
          <year>2005</year>
          . p.
          <fpage>112</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ladner</surname>
            , Andreas,
            <given-names>Jan</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fivaz</surname>
            , and
            <given-names>Joëlle</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pianzola</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>"Voting advice applications and party choice: evidence from smartvote users in Switzerland."</article-title>
          <source>International Journal of Electronic Governance</source>
          <volume>5</volume>
          .
          <fpage>3</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>4</lpage>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          ):
          <fpage>367</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>387</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Snellen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I. Th M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>"Local e-democracy in five European countries: Convergence and divergence in democratic development." Public administration in the information age</article-title>
          :
          <source>Revisited</source>
          <volume>19</volume>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          ):
          <fpage>116</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pratchett</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Lawrence.
          <article-title>"Understanding e-democracy developments in Europe." Scoping Paper prepared for CAHDE http</article-title>
          ://www. dmu. ac. uk/ (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yavorska</surname>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Prihunov</surname>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Syerov</surname>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Libraries in Social Networks: Opportunities and Presentations</article-title>
          .
          <source>CEUR Workshop Proceedings</source>
          .
          <year>2019</year>
          . Vol
          <volume>2392</volume>
          :
          <source>Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Control, Optimisation and Analytical Processing of Social Networks</source>
          , COAPSN-2019. P.
          <volume>242</volume>
          -
          <fpage>251</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Oni</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Aderonke A., et al.
          <article-title>"Strategic framework for e-democracy development and sustainability." Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy (</article-title>
          <year>2016</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>