<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Entitymetrics 2.0: Measuring the Impact of Entities and Relations Extracted from Scientific Documents</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Min Song</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Yonsei University</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>South Korea min.song@yonsei.ac.kr</string-name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2020</year>
      </pub-date>
      <abstract>
        <p />
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>Since the concept of entitymetrics was first introduced in 2013, entitymetrics has been
applied to measure the impact of entities as well as to gauge the knowledge usage and
transfer anchored on entities for knowledge discovery. This concept extends
informetrics by quantifying the importance of various types of entities such as concept,
dataset, and domain entities buried in a large amount of full-text collections.
Entitymetrics uses entities for knowledge usage as well as discovery. We claim that it
is the next generation of content-based citation analysis in that it aims to utilize
entities to create a knowledge graph for scientific discovery where entities are
connected to each other either by citation or predicate relation. In this talk, the
previous studies employing entitiymetrics are summarized and the limitations of the
current approaches are discussed. In addition, the future directions of entitymetrics are
suggested.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>