<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Increasing the Distinctiveness of Forest Species Composition by Satellite Images</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Sergey Zraenko</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Engineering School of Information Technologies, Telecommunications and Control Systems Ural Federal University Ekaterinburg</institution>
          ,
          <country country="RU">Russia</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2020</year>
      </pub-date>
      <fpage>109</fpage>
      <lpage>112</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>-The brightness of reflections from coniferous and foliar vegetation was studied using Landsat-7 images for different seasons of the year. Results were obtained for each of the spectral channels of the ETM + sensor, which allows forming standards for classifying forest vegetation in various phenological phases. To increase the distinctness of plant objects, information about their brightness is combined with data from another spectral channel. As a result, an additional classification feature is formed - the Euclidean distance in the space of spectral brightness. It is shown that the combination of two channels can significantly increase the number of informative classification features when mapping forest vegetation.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>spectral brightness</kwd>
        <kwd>coniferous and foliar vegetation</kwd>
        <kwd>Landsat-7</kwd>
        <kwd>combination of two spectral channels</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>INTRODUCTION</p>
      <p>When classifying forest vegetation from satellite images,
the spectral brightness coefficient is used. This coefficient is
usually defined as the absolute value of the object's
brightness in various spectral ranges [1]. Differences in the
level of reflection from vegetation depend on its species
composition in the study area, phenological phases of
development and the state determined by weather conditions.
The values of this parameter are also affected by the spatial,
radiometric and spectral resolution of the shooting
equipment; the time and season of shooting (changes in the
azimuth and height of the Sun); exposure and steepness of
the surface; the characteristics of atmospheric transparency.</p>
      <p>The purpose of the study is to determine the information
content of spectral brightness as a classification feature in the
selection of coniferous and foliar vegetation. The relevance
of this problem is confirmed by active research on the
formation of spectral libraries of plant and natural objects
based on satellite images [2–5], as well as monitoring their
state and classification by multispectral and hyperspectral
data [6,7].</p>
      <p>II.</p>
      <p>RESEARCH METHODS</p>
      <p>Satellite images of a flat forest area were selected for the
study (Fig. 1). In this drawing, a fragment of a foliar forest is
highlighted in black, while a coniferous forest is highlighted
in gray. The images used were obtained using ETM +
equipment (Table 1) the Landsat–7 satellite [8].</p>
      <p>The spectral brightness of reflection from vegetation was
determined for its various phenological phases (for different
seasons of the year: winter-spring, summer and autumn). In
this case, the mathematical expectation and standard
deviation of the reflection brightness in each spectral channel
were determined by a set of image pixels corresponding to a
known type of vegetation cover.</p>
      <p>Spectral Band</p>
      <p>
        (number)
1 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        )
2 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        )
3 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        )
4 (4)
5 (5)
61 (6) Low Gain
62 (7) High Gain
7 (8)
8 (9)
Fig. 1. Space image of the study area.
      </p>
      <p>CHARACTERISTICS OF THEMATIC MAPPER (ETM+)</p>
      <p>Wave Length (µm)</p>
      <p>Pixel size (m)</p>
      <p>In the course of the research, a specialized database was
used to store the source images corresponding to the
analyzed fragments [9]. This database also contains
information about the composition of forest species, area,
and other parameters of the study sites.</p>
      <p>III.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS</title>
      <p>As a result of the study, spectral curves were obtained for
the winter and spring months (Fig.2), as well as for the
summer and autumn months (Fig.3).</p>
      <p>It should be noted that the use of Landsat satellite images
is characterized by a large time interval (16 days) for
capturing images of the same surface. At the same time, the
presence of frequent clouds for the 600 North latitude, where
the analyzed forest area is located, does not allow you to
collect images corresponding to different seasons of the same
year (close years). In addition, not all images for the study
area are available in the Landsat system operator's database
[10]. These points often limit the accuracy of obtaining
quantitative results from conducted studies.</p>
      <p>
        These differences in one channel were determined as
follows
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        )
Here BFi and BCi is the brightness of foliar and coniferous
species, respectively, for images of the same size in the i-th
spectral channel.
      </p>
      <p>the difference in brightness of species, and the
measure of their difference is determined by mathematical
expectation and standard deviation.</p>
      <p>
        Negative numbers in the table below correspond to the
overlap of the brightness values of coniferous and foliar
vegetation in accordance with the criterion defined (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ). At
the same time, coniferous and foliar vegetation differ most
in spectral brightness in the following channels: 1, 2, 3 of
the February image, 5 – April, 4 – May, 4, 5 – July, 1, 3 –
October. The results obtained can be explained by the
absence of foliage and reflection from the snow through the
crown of foliar trees in February and reflection from the
litter in April, the appearance and presence of foliage that
differs in tone from the needles in May and July, the change
in color of the foliage and its fall in October.
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        )
      </p>
      <p>In the figures below, dependencies for foliar forests are
shown in black, while for coniferous forests they are shown
in gray. Here, the upper curve corresponds to the
mathematical expectation of brightness, to which is added to
its doubled standard deviation. The lower curve corresponds
to the mathematical expectation of brightness, from which its
doubled standard deviation is subtracted.</p>
      <p>As follows from the results, the spectral characteristics of
reflection from coniferous and foliar areas in the spectral
channels of Landsat–7 differ from each other in different
seasons of the year. A quantitative assessment of the
brightness differences of the vegetation under study for
spectral channels with a resolution of 30 meters is given in
table 2.</p>
      <p>To increase the number of informative features that
distinguish coniferous and foliar vegetation, spectral
channels were combined in pairs. Spectral channels with the
same spatial resolution of 30 meters were also used. Then the
Euclidean distance in brightness and the measure of the
difference between coniferous and foliar species was
calculated between the channels</p>
      <p>Based on Landsat–7 satellite data for different seasons, a
fragment of the spectral library of coniferous and foliar
vegetation of the forest area located in the area of 600 North
latitude of the European part of the Russian Federation was
formed.</p>
      <p>Based on the introduced criterion based on the
calculation of mathematical expectation and the doubled
mean square deviation for the difference in spectral
brightness between the studied vegetation types, the
following conclusions are formulated. Coniferous and foliar
species differ the most in channels 1, 2, 3 of the February
image, 5 – April, 4 – May, 4, 5 – July, 1, 3 – October. The
results obtained are explained by the absence of foliage and
reflection from the snow through the crown of foliar trees in
February and reflection from the litter in April, the
appearance and presence of foliage that differs in tone from
the needles in May and July, the change in color of the
foliage and its fall in October.</p>
      <p>To increase the number of informative features that
distinguish coniferous and foliar vegetation, spectral
channels were combined in pairs. In this case, as in the case
of a single channel, spectral channels with the same spatial
resolution of 30 meters were used. Then the Euclidean
distance in brightness and a similar measure of the
difference between coniferous and foliar species were
calculated between the channels. It is shown that combining
information from two channels can significantly increase the
number of informative vegetation classification features for
the selected seasons. We also selected pairs of channels,
combining which allows you to get the maximum difference
between coniferous and foliar vegetation. Thus, the
effectiveness of combining spectral brightness channels in
the formation of classification features for forest vegetation
has been quantitatively demonstrated.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>ACKNOWLEDGMENT</title>
      <p>The work was supported by RFBR, contract N
19-2909022.</p>
      <p>Here is the difference in brightness and a measure
of distance of coniferous and foliar vegetation when using
the i–th and j–th spectral channels.</p>
      <p>The result of combining the brightness of these objects in
two spectral channels is a significant increase in the number
of informative features for their classification (table 3).</p>
      <p>This table shows the numbers of spectral channels, the
combination of which does not lead to overlap by the
introduced measure of difference (4) of coniferous and foliar
vegetation. In this case, for example, for July images, you
can add nine additional classification features to the existing
two by combining them 1–4, 1–5, 2–4, 2–5, 3–4, 3–5, 4–5,
4–8, and 5–8 channels. This increases the total number of
features for classifying coniferous and foliar vegetation.</p>
      <p>To demonstrate the increase in the measure of the
difference between breeds, the parameter with the highest
value for the channel (shown in parentheses) combined with
the original one (table 4) is calculated.</p>
      <p>For the February image, for example, the greatest
differences in plant species are obtained when the first and
third channels are combined. When combining two
channels, the difference between coniferous and foliar
vegetation, as a rule, increases significantly.</p>
      <p>URL:</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Yu.F.</given-names>
            <surname>Knizhnikov</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “Spectral brightness,”
          <article-title>Lomonosov knowledge foundation [Online]</article-title>
          . - URL: http://www.lomonosovfund.ru/enc/ru/encyclopedia:
          <volume>0132521</volume>
          (
          <issue>10</issue>
          .
          <fpage>05</fpage>
          .
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.S.</given-names>
            <surname>Kasimov</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.I.</given-names>
            <surname>Golubeva</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.K.</given-names>
            <surname>Lurie</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.V.</given-names>
            <surname>Zimin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.E.</given-names>
            <surname>Samsonov</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.V.</given-names>
            <surname>Tutubalina</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.G.</given-names>
            <surname>Rees</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.I.</given-names>
            <surname>Mikheeva</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.R.</given-names>
            <surname>Alyautdinov</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Library of spectral characteristics of geographical objects within the structure of the Lomonosov</article-title>
          Moscow State University geoportal,” Moscow university geography bulletin, vol.
          <volume>5</volume>
          , pp.
          <fpage>3</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>8</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2015</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>[3] ECOSTRESS spectral library - Version 1</source>
          .0 [Online]. - URL: https://speclib.jpl.nasa.
          <source>gov (09.05</source>
          .
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.J.</given-names>
            <surname>Zomer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Trabucco</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.L.</given-names>
            <surname>Ustin</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Building spectral libraries for wetlands land cover classification and hyperspectral remote sensing,”</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Environ</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Management, vol.
          <volume>90</volume>
          , рp.
          <fpage>2170</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2177</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2009</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.S. Boori</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Paringer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Choudhary</surname>
            and
            <given-names>A.V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kupriyanov</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Comparison of hyperspectral and multi-spectral imagery to building a spectral library and land cover classification performance,” Computer Optics</article-title>
          , vol.
          <volume>42</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>6</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>1035</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1045</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          . DOI:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .18287/
          <fpage>2412</fpage>
          -6179-2018-42-6-
          <fpage>1035</fpage>
          -1045.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.A.</given-names>
            <surname>Varlamova</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Denisova</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.V.</given-names>
            <surname>Sergeev</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Earth remote sensing data processing for obtaining vegetation types maps,”</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.M.</given-names>
            <surname>Borzov</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.A.</given-names>
            <surname>Guryanov</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>O.I. Potaturkin</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Study of the classification efficiency of difficult-to-distinguish vegetation types using hyperspectral data,” Computer Optics</article-title>
          , vol.
          <volume>43</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>3</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>464</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>473</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2019</year>
          . DOI:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .18287/
          <fpage>2412</fpage>
          -6179-2019-43-3-
          <fpage>464</fpage>
          -473.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Enhanced</given-names>
            <surname>Thematic Mapper Plus</surname>
          </string-name>
          (ETM+) [Online]. - https://landsat.usgs.gov/landsat-7
          <source>-history (08.05</source>
          .
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>S.M. Zraenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>A system for satellite images database management for the study of algorithms for natural objects monitoring</article-title>
          ,
          <source>” CEUR Workshop Proceedings</source>
          , vol.
          <year>2005</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>162</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>171</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <article-title>Landsat data access [Online]</article-title>
          . - URL: https://earthexplorer.usgs.
          <source>gov (07.05</source>
          .
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>