<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Universit ̈at Leipzig, Germany TU Dresden, Germany Universit ̈at Koblenz-Landau, Germany Universit ̈at Gießen, Germany German University in Cairo, Egypt University of Birmingham, UK TU Dortmund, Germany Cardiff University, UK Universit ̈at Osnabru ̈ck, Germany Universit ̈at Bamberg, Germany Universit ̈at Koblenz-Landau</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Germany TU Wien, Austria TU Dresden, Germany TU Wien</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="AT">Austria</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>University of Amsterdam, Netherlands Universit ̈at Leipzig</institution>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Information for real life AI applications is usually pervaded by uncertainty and subject to change, and thus demands for non-classical reasoning approaches. At the same time, psychological findings indicate that human reasoning cannot be completely described by classical logical systems. Sources of explanations are incomplete knowledge, incorrect beliefs, or inconsistencies. A wide range of reasoning mechanism has to be considered, such as analogical or defeasible reasoning, possibly in combination with machine learning methods. The field of knowledge representation and reasoning offers a rich palette of methods for uncertain reasoning both to describe human reasoning and to model AI approaches. The aim of this series of workshops is to address recent challenges and to present novel approaches to uncertain reasoning and belief change in their broad senses, and in particular provide a forum for research work linking different paradigms of reasoning. We put a special focus on papers from both fields that provide a base for connecting formal-logical models of knowledge representation and cognitive models of reasoning and learning, addressing formal as well as experimental or heuristic issues. Previous events of the Workshop on Formal and Cognitive Reasoning took place in Dresden (2015), Bremen (2016), Dortmund (2017), Berlin (2018), and Kassel (2019).</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>As in the past, the workshop Formal and Cognitive Reasoning (FCR-2020) at
KI-2020, the 43rd German Conference on Artificial Intelligence, was organized
jointly by the GI special interest groups Wissensrepr¨asentation und Schließen
and Kognition. Because of the success of this joint workshop series, we will use
solely the single acronym FCR. The workshop series emerged from two separate
workshop series, namely Dynamics of Knowledge and Belief (DKB) and KI &amp;
Kognition (KIK).</p>
      <p>This volume contains the papers presented at the FCR-2020 workshop held
on 22-Sep-2020. The KI-2020 conference and all its workshops were expected to
take place in Bamberg, Germany. However, because of the corona pandemic all
were turned into fully virtual events – as so many events in 2020.</p>
      <p>There were eight submissions to the workshop. Each submission was reviewed
by two program committee members. The committee decided to accept six
papers for presentation. In consequence, the workshop hosted contributions with
diverse topics such as artificial mental states, automated reasoning, belief
revision, consciousness, description logics, natural language understanding, norms
and defeasibility.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>The organizers of this workshop would like to thank the organizers of the
KI2020 conference for their support. We also would like to thank the members of
the program committee and the additional reviewers for their help in carefully
reviewing and selecting the submitted papers, and finally all participants of the
workshop for their contributions. Our wish is that new inspirations and
collaborations between the contributing disciplines will emerge from this workshop.
Last but not least, we are very grateful to Michael Kohlhase for enriching the
program by an invited talk.</p>
      <p>Christoph Beierle, Marco Ragni, Frieder Stolzenburg, Matthias Thimm</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Workshop Organizers and Co-Chairs</title>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Christoph Beierle Marco Ragni Frieder Stolzenburg Matthias Thimm</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Program Committee</title>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>Ringo Baumann</title>
        <p>Emmanuelle-Anna Dietz
Ulrich Furbach
Lupita Estefania Gazzo Castaneda
Haythem O. Ismail
Manfred Kerber
Gabriele Kern-Isberner
Sylwia Polberg
Nico Potyka
Ute Schmid
Claudia Schon
Hans Tompits
Christoph Wernhard
Stefan Woltran
Additional Reviewers
Adrian Haret
Markus Ulbricht</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>