<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Predicting the economic efficiency of the business model of an industrial enterprise using machine learning methods</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Karpatska Str.</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ivano-Frankivsk</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ukraine liliana.goral@gmail.com</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>inesa.hvostina@gmail.com</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>viraSh@i.ua</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>yashcheritsyna@gmail.com</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>korolSV@i.ua</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>15 Heroiv Oborony Str., Kyiv, 03041</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>State University of Economics and Technology</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>5 Stepana Tilhy Str., Kryvyi Rih, 50006</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>0000</fpage>
      <lpage>0001</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The paper considers the problem of studying the impact of key determinants on the industrial enterprise business model economic efficiency and aims to build an optimal model for predicting the industrial enterprise business model effectiveness using neural boundaries. A system of key determinants key factors has been developed. Significant factors were later used to build neural networks that characterize the studied resultant trait development vector. The procedure for constructing neural networks was performed in the STATISTICA Neural Networks environment. As input parameters, according to the previous analysis, 6 key factor indicators were selected. The initial parameter is determined by economic efficiency. According to the results of the neural network analysis, 100 neural networks were tested and the top 5 were saved. The following types of neural network architectures, multilayer perceptron, generalized regression network and linear network were used. Based on the results of the neural network modeling, 5 multilayer perceptrons of neural network architectures were proposed. According to descriptive statistics, the best model was a multilayer perceptron, with the MLP 6-10-1 architecture, which identifies a model with 6 input variables, one output variable and one hidden layer containing 10 hidden neurons. According to the analysis of the sensitivity of the network to input variables, it was determined that the network is the most sensitive to the variable the share of electricity costs in total costs. According to the results of selected neural networks standard prediction, the hypothesis of the best neural network was confirmed as Absolute res., Squared res, Std. Res for the neural network MLP 6-10-1 reached</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>the optimal value and indicate that the selected model really has small residues,
which indicates a fairly high accuracy of the forecast when using it.
1</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The intensification of the digital transformation of industrial enterprises in general
and oil transportation in particular necessitates the urgent introduction of
digitalization tools and means, which should ultimately lead to an increase in the
efficiency of economic entities. Given these circumstances, the issue of assessing the
economic efficiency of the enterprise business model from the introduction of modern
IT is relevant. Digitalization is one of the industrial enterprises’ development key
determinants, it is a field for the formation of economic efficiency of the enterprise
business model. Therefore, the success of companies, including their performance
indicators, depends on the effective use of modern IT in the activities of business
entities. In such conditions, it is important to model the enterprise business model
effectiveness in the digital transformation of economic systems.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Background</title>
      <p>Examining the topic of modeling the effectiveness of economic entities, we can
conclude that there are many methods, techniques, tools, methods of economic and
mathematical modeling of the phenomenon. The difficulty of studying this
phenomenon is that for different companies, the efficiency of activities can be
affected by various factors. In addition, the concept of efficiency is not unambiguous,
so it can be considered through the prism of various result indicators, influencing
factors and their combinations. There is a huge variety of built efficiency models for
different enterprises. Therefore, consider some of the proposed models of efficiency.</p>
      <p>
        In particular, we can highlight economic production quantity model with learning
in production, quality, reliability and energy efficiency. The article [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ] of B. Marchi,
S. Zanoni and M. Y. Jaber proposes a lot sizing model for a manufacturing company
that includes the relevant learning outcomes, directly and indirectly, affecting its
energy efficiency. The main result of the study is to show how learning in production
and energy efficiency affects each other and the optimal lot size quantity [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ]. In this
paper, the model of the company's success is considered through optimization derived
an economic order quantity model with controllable production rate.
      </p>
      <p>
        A. Zakharov and S.-L. Jämsä-Jounela in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
        ] are suggested an iterative method for
optimization of the plant profit rate is proposed avoiding the control saturation and is
applied to the Pulp Mill benchmark model optimization. Three different static models
describing the steady state values of the manipulated variables are constructed and
used in the optimization. The results of the optimization are presented and compared
against the straightforward single-step optimization of the plant economic efficiency
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        In addition Agnieszka Bezat-Jarzębowska and Włodzimierz Rembisz proposed
efficiency-focused economic modeling of competitiveness in the agri-food sector [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ].
Authors believe that the main source of producers’ competitiveness and growth is not
the increase of input factors but the efficiency of their use. The efficiency-focused
modeling presented in the paper bases on the production function, more precisely on
the SFA method (the Stochastic Frontier Approach), which is appropriate primarily
for samples with high randomness. In the analysis Cobb-Douglas and translogarithmic
models are applied [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Katarína Teplická in the article [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
        ] discussed methods of pricing for the selected
product and examined the impact on economic efficiency of the enterprise. Through
comparing of various methods could find out reserves in area of costs decreasing by
the way it could satisfy demands of client at the level of target price. She compared
calculating methods at the pricing of product. In present time customers influence
considerably product’s price by their demands and therefore producers, businessmen
must nowadays adapt prices of their products to demands of customers [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Mykola Havrylenko, Vira Shiyko, Liliana Horal, Inesa Khvostina, and Natalia
Yashcheritsyna [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ] are propose two methods for evaluating the financial efficiency of
a business model of industrial enterprises. In order to evaluate the financial efficiency
of the business model of an industrial enterprise, a system of single indicators for
assessing the financial condition of the enterprise by such components as financial
stability, liquidity and solvency, business activity and profitability was formed.
Fishburne’s rule weights the major components of an integral measure of an
enterprise’s business model financial performance. In addition, an integral measure of
the financial performance of the business model is modeled using the fuzzy set
method and taxonomic analysis, which will help to evaluate the financial performance
level of the business model more objectively. The comparative analysis of the
obtained results by different methods of calculation of integral indicators is carried
out [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        When forming a business model of an enterprise, it is necessary to take into
account risks in order to minimize them. One of the methods for diversifying risks is
their insurance [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]. Insurance companies take these risks into account when forming a
risk portfolio. The activities of any other enterprise are aimed at increasing the
country’s oil and gas economy. One of the important indicators of the economic state
of the country is the gross domestic product [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ], which depends on the successful
operation of the enterprise on the basis of a well-built business model.
3
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Methodology</title>
      <p>
        Entering the digital space of industrial enterprises, including oil transportation
companies, opens up new opportunities for these businesses, which are to use the
following technologies and approaches: artificial intelligence and advanced analytics
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ]; automation and robotics; digitization of business processes; use of the Internet
of Things (IoT) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ], cloud computing [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ], sensors, mobile devices [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ], flexible
development and design thinking.
      </p>
      <p>
        The process of assessing the impact of these IT on the efficiency of the oil
transportation company has remained unexplored [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. However, to address this issue,
industrial enterprises face problems in using such technologies. These include: low
level of digital culture of domestic industrial enterprises, lack of leadership,
expectation of economic opportunity for change, unclear economic effect of
investment in the digitalization process, lack of the digital operations benefits clear
vision and better management by senior management through the digitalization
process. and non-production processes.
      </p>
      <p>These problems of digitalization of industrial enterprises require the transformation
of production and organizational structures of economic entities for the effective
implementation of ICT. The new revolution requires the formation of such a system
of organization and management of activities, which will ensure, based on the
analysis of performance, not only the elimination of the causes of existing
discrepancies, but also help to identify and prevent their occurrence.</p>
      <p>Thus, there is a need to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of activities
“before” and “after” the introduction of ICT and to monitor them constantly.
Evaluating the effectiveness of enterprises business processes digitalization will allow
on the basis of the digitalized business model of the enterprise to monitor the
activities in general, identify problem areas of the entity, make optimal management
decisions and experiment by using a digitalized business model (digital twin of the
enterprise) without intervention into the actual production process.</p>
      <p>It should be noted that the indicators for assessing the effectiveness of digitization
may be different for different processes and can be both generalized and detailed for
each business process or function.</p>
      <p>Due to the large number of the digitalization process influence area on the
efficiency of the industrial enterprise digitalization effectiveness determining model
will be:
= ∑
∑
(1)
where Еd – the overall efficiency of the enterprise digitalization; еij – unit efficiency
of the i-th business process (function) from the j-th IT.</p>
      <p>The tasks performed by the procedure of evaluating of an industrial enterprise
business processes digitalization effectiveness is that:
─ There is a search for problem areas during the interaction of employees of different
departments in the process of information support and business processes;
─ The main, additional and auxiliary directions of economic entities activity for the
purpose of decomposition on digital business processes are defined;
─ Prerequisites are formed for the construction of an orderly electronic document
management system;
─ The regulation of enterprise activity is established;
─ The process of conducting experiments in the activities of the enterprise is possible
in order to determine the strategies of enterprise development in the current
conditions of enterprises operation.</p>
      <p>To form a system for evaluating the effectiveness of digitalization of business
processes of JSC “Ukrtransnafta” define its main stages, taking into account the
peculiarities of the research enterprise. Figure 1 shows the stages of evaluating the
JSC “Ukrtransnafta” business processes digitalization effectiveness.</p>
      <p>1
2
3
4
5
• Construction of the enterprise virtual business model using the analysis
of the work regulation information system and determination of the
digital way of performing business processes.
• Formation of quantitative indicators system for evaluating the
effectiveness of each IT in relation to the business process on key
performance indicators.
• Calculation of parameters of quantitative indicators of business
processes digitalization efficiency and formation of efficiency matrix
in a ratio IT-business / business process.
• Analysis of the obtained values of the business processes digitalization
efficiency corfficients.
• Forming conclusions about the business processes digitalization
effectiveness. Development of business processes digitalization
efficiency increase.</p>
      <p>Given the peculiarities of the oil transportation companies activities, the business
processes digitalization impact will be carried out directly on the tariffs. Thus, the
model for determining the effectiveness of digitization must be built taking into
account the sequence of the researched enterprise business processes. Figure 2 defines
the sequence of JSC “Ukrtransnafta” business processes.</p>
      <p>At each of the above stages of oil transportation in the conditions of digitalization
it is necessary to enter the digitization coefficient, which will eventually be reduced to
an integrated indicator of activities digitization, which will reflect the synergistic
impact of each stage digitization coefficients. Thus, taking into account the
peculiarities of the oil transportation company business processes, the integrated
indicator of digitalization, which must be taken into account when forming the main
performance indicator – the tariff will take the form:
where kd – synergetic digitization factor; kі – digitization ratio on the i-th business
process; і=1, …, n – the number of oil transportation business processes.
(2)
4. Management of oil
transportation
systems
• Operation of
main and
auxiliary
equipment
1. Oil pumping station
2. Transportation by
main pipeline
• Storage of
petroleum
products for
end use
3. Operation of the</p>
      <p>tank farm</p>
      <p>It should be noted that tariffs for transportation of oil and oil products are established
by the general rules of “Tariffs formation methods”, which does not account for the
development of alternative transportation markets, digitalization of the economy,
accounting standards used time, resources, materials, regulated by the old technology,
operating in the early 2000s.</p>
      <p>Given that all of the above business processes form cost centers, it is necessary to
determine the synergy of costs that arises from the digitalization of business
processes. This synergetic effect of cost reduction will have a direct impact on the
overall digitization ratio, which will increase economic efficiency. It is interesting for
this company to form a correlation-regression model of the enterprise efficiency
dependence through the introduction of ICT and reduce costs in each business process
(fig. 2) of the studied enterprise. Based on the results of previous studies in the work,
which indicate that for the investigated enterprise financial efficiency is at an average
level and it increases at the end of the period, we consider it necessary to assess the
economic efficiency of the oil company business model using computer economy
methods to determine key success factors of the researched enterprise.</p>
      <p>Therefore, the resulting indicator in the proposed correlation-regression model will
be the efficiency as the ratio of net income from sales to the cost of goods sold. After
all, when assessing the result of management must take into account not o nly the
statement of the goal achievement, but also the optimal ways to achieve it. The choice
of the regression or multifactor model type (analytical expression) depends on the
type of factor features connection with the effective one. Thus, the initial form of the
resulting function is reflected as a dependence:
= ( ; ;
… ,
),
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
where Y – effective feature-function of the enterprise efficiency; х1, х2, х3, …, хn –
factor features.</p>
      <p>Figure 3 shows the dynamics of the JSC “Ukrtransnafta” business model efficiency
and the volume of transported oil in UAH million for 2010-2019.</p>
      <p>Thus, from the results of calculating the enterprise business model efficiency and its
relationship with the dynamics of transported oil, we can conclude that the change of
the first indicator does not have a stable trend, in addition, at the end of the period
there is an increase in the efficiency of the business model production efficiency
(volumes of transported oil). Therefore, it is necessary to investigate and identify the
factors that affect the growth of the business model economic efficiency, along with
the decline in production activity of the enterprise, which is associated with both the
global crisis and unstable international economic relations. To further enhance the
positive impact and level the negative, provided it is impossible to turn it into a
positive impact.</p>
      <p>To determine the main factors influencing the performance indicator, it is advisable
to use the method of correlation-regression analysis. The indicator of enterprise
activity efficiency was chosen as the resulting indicator (Y). As mentioned above, the
key determinants that affect the efficiency of the investigated enterprise are costs, the
cost of petroleum products transportation, the organizational structure of the volume
in table 1 we will summarize the quantitative indicators of each of the identified key
evaluation determinants and include their correlation-regression model of the studied
enterprise business model economic efficiency.</p>
      <p>Summary data for correlation-regression analysis of the influence of certain factors
influence on the efficiency of the oil transportation company business model are
given in table 2. Given the fact that all production and non-production areas of
activity, including the pipeline system will consistently move to a digital display of
activities, it is advisable to introduce methods of experiments in the study of
improving the efficiency of the enterprise through optimization of input, significant
parameters.</p>
      <p>To build an adequate regression model of the studied enterprise business model
economic efficiency, it is necessary to check the selected factors-indicators for the
phenomenon of multicollinearity. Using the Data Analysis package in Excel, a
correlation matrix was constructed, which demonstrates the strength of the
relationship between the selected factor values and the performance indicator.</p>
      <p>The calculation of the correlation matrix allows us to conclude that there is a close
relationship between the performance indicator (Y) and the factor values, except for
the pair (Y and x4, x5, x9, x10, x11, x12, x14). These factors will be excluded from the
study when constructing the regression equation. In addition to the study of the
correlation between the performance indicator and the factors, it is advisable to
determine the interdependence (multicollinearity) of the factor quantities-features
among themselves. The phenomenon of multicollinearity occurs when the coefficients
of pairwise correlation of trait factors are equal to 0.7 or more according to the
Chedok scale, which indicates a close and very close relationship between certain trait
factors. In this case, those factor features between which the phenomenon of
multicollinearity was established should be excluded from the correlation-regression
model. Those indicators of the relationship between which remains weak, are
included in the economic-mathematical model for further construction of the
regression equation.</p>
      <p>Further conducted regression analysis between the effective rate and factor
variables x1, x2, x3, x6, x7, x8, x13 using the Regression tool of Data analysis package in
MS Excel.</p>
      <p>To verify the formed regression model for adequacy, significance in general and
regression coefficients, in addition to identifying correlation-regression relationships
between performance and factor values, the coefficient of determination, multiple
regression, standard error, and Student’s t-test were calculated. The multiple
regression coefficient R = 0.998 indicates a close relationship between the
performance indicator and the factors. Regarding the value of the determination
coefficient R2 of the obtained correlation-regression model R2 = 0.996, the
dependence of the resulting feature by 99.6% is due to the selected factor values. The
remaining 0.4% are due to other factors that affect the efficiency of the enterprise, but
are not included in the regression model.</p>
      <p>According to the results of the multiple regression coefficient calculation and
determination, the relationship between the resulting indicator and the factors-features
is quite natural. Analysis of the constructed model variance shows that the factors
included in the regression model are significant, as the residual sum of squares, as it is
indicated in table 2, is less than 1% of the total sum of squares, i.e. 99% of the
resulting indicator variation is due to the studied factors and only 1% variation of the
resulting indicator is caused by the action of random variables. Since
F (71.37)&gt;Significance of F (0.013) and F (0.013)&lt;0.05, it can be stated that the
results of the regression model correspond to the empirical data and the number of
independent variables included in the regression model is sufficient to describe the
dependent variable. The values of F and the significance of F indicate a sufficient
level of the evaluation results reliability and the significance of the developed
equation.</p>
      <p>Table 3 shows the results of regression coefficients calculations and statistics of
their significance. Based on the calculations, we can conclude that all factors included
in the regression model are reliable, because tK&gt;tcrit, where the critical value of tcrit at
the set level of significance is 0.15 and was determined using the STEERING
function of the MS Excel. The data in table 3 allow obtaining the following regression
model:</p>
      <p>Y=0.8843–0.0047x1–0.0013x2+0.000000078x3+0.9470x6+0.0394x7+0.0519x8–0.8867x13
Thus, based on the results of the correlation-regression analysis, it can be concluded
that the greatest influence on the oil transportation company business model
efficiency is exerted by the following factors: average tariff on the transit
transportation of petroleum products by main pipelines per 1 ton net; average tariff on
the transportation of petroleum products to refineries by main pipelines, UAH for
1 ton net; residual value of fixed assets, thousand UAH; level of fixed assets
depreciation; proportion of wage costs in the total costs, %; proportion of electricity
costs in the total amount of costs, %; proportion of capital investment in equipment
repair.</p>
      <p>Therefore, among the obtained results, the level of fixed assets depreciation has the
greatest positive influence on the resulting indicator. The growth of this indicator by
1 unit will increase the resulting figure by 0.94 units. The biggest negative impact on
the industrial enterprise business model efficiency has the proportion of capital
investment in equipment repair, namely the growth of this factor by 1 will reduce the
efficiency of the business model by 0.88 units. We calculated the elasticity for each
factor by the formula:
=
,
(4)
where bj – the corresponding coefficient of the regression equation; – the arithmetic
mean of the variable xj; – the arithmetic mean of the endogenous variable yj.</p>
      <p>In practice, it is often necessary to compare the separate effect on the dependent
variable of different explanatory variables, when the latter ones are expressed in
different units. In this case, the coefficients of elasticity are used. The coefficient of
elasticity Ej shows how many percent Y will change on the average if xj is increased
by 1%. Since further calculations require additional statistical indicators for the
resulting feature and factors, we will use the Statistics package of MS Excel, the
obtained intermediate calculations for further analysis are summarized in table 3.</p>
      <p>Thus, based on the results of the elasticity coefficient factors calculation of the
regression model, we can conclude that the growth of the average tariff on the transit
transportation of petroleum products by main pipelines, UAH per 1 ton of net, by 1%
will reduce the economic efficiency of the business model by 0.51%, and an increase
in the average tariff on the transportation of petroleum products to refineries by main
pipelines, UAH for 1 ton net, by 1% will reduce the economic efficiency by 0.04%. In
this case, the management of the investigated enterprise should take measures to
reduce the tariffs, especially their cost. Another factor that reduces the economic
efficiency of the business model of the studied enterprise is the proportion of capital
investment in equipment repair, its increase by 1% will reduce the resulting indicator
by 0.44%. Of the eight factors studied, four have a positive effect on increasing the
economic efficiency of the oil transportation company business model. In particular,
an increase in the residual value of fixed assets by 1% will lead to an increase in the
resulting indicator by 0.38%, which shows the need to update the fixed assets base.
An increase in the level of fixed assets depreciation by 1% will increase the economic
efficiency by 0.19%. An increase in the proportion of wage costs by 1% will increase
the resulting indicator by 0.56%, and an increase in the proportion of electricity costs
in total costs by 1% will increase the economic efficiency of the business model by
0.29%. Thus, the increase in the studied costs leads to an increase in the efficiency of
the business model to a greater extent than the increase in the tariff on transportation,
as it is proved by the developed correlation-regression model.</p>
      <p>To determine the factors that have the greatest reserve for improving the resulting
indicator, taking into account the degrees of the factors-indicators variation, we use
the calculation of standardized regression β coefficients by the formula:
=
∆ =
where
– quadratic mean deviation of the i-th factor-indicator;
– quadratic mean
deviation of the resulting indicator.</p>
      <p>The delta coefficient indicates what part of the contribution the studied factor
makes in the total influence of all selected factors. It is determined by the formula:
where
–
matching correlation coefficient;
– coefficient of
multiple
determination.</p>
      <p>It should be noted that the increase in the number of factors-indicators, which are
included in the multifactor correlation-regression model, allows establishing the
additional resources of the studied resulting indicator.</p>
      <p>The results of the obtained calculations of ∆ and β coefficients are summarized in
table 4.
(5)
(6)</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>Factor-indicator</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>The standard Regression</title>
        <p>deviation coefficient
Y – the enterprise business
model efficiency 0.4030771 0.8842506
х1 – average tariff for
transit transportation of
oil products by main pipe- 86.4343677 -0.0047326 -1.0148456
lines, UAH for 1 ton net
х2 – average tariff for
transportation of oil
products to refineries by main 32.6194806 -0.0013603 -0.0005133
pipelines, UAH for 1 ton
net
х3 – fixed assets residual
value, thousand UAH 6456617.74 0.0000001 0.0154706
х6 – the level of fixed
assets depreciation 0.2879776 0.9470437 0.0000000
х7 – the share of wage
costs in the total costs, % 7.3646677 0.0394198 1.0081115
х8 – share of electricity
costs in the total amount 2.8927203 0.0519409 0.0204015
of costs, %
х13 – the share of capital
investment in equipment 0.2479886
repairs, %</p>
        <p>0.0570191
coeffici- Paired
corre</p>
        <p>lation
coeffients cient
∆
coefficients</p>
        <p>Based on the obtained results of calculating ∆j and βj coefficients, it can be concluded
that the vectors of the calculated βj and coefficients are proved by the results of
elasticity coefficients calculation in table 4. However, according to the results of the
latter calculations, the greatest negative impact on the studied enterprise business
model efficiency by the standard deviation is the factor of the average tariff on the
transit transportation of petroleum products by main pipelines, UAH for 1 ton net.
The greatest positive impact on the resulting indicator by the standard deviation is
exerted by the factor the proportion of wage costs in the total amount of costs, %.
Based on the results of ∆j calculation and coefficients, it can be concluded that this
statistics are confirmed by the results of βj calculation and characteristics.</p>
        <p>Recently, along with traditional methods of analyzing the socio-economic
indicators, the use of neural networks, which belong to artificial intelligence systems,
is becoming more widespread. After all, their scope is extremely large: forecasting
changes in the stock exchange, making credit plans, making decisions when landing a
damaged aircraft, approximating functions, solving optimization problems, managing
complex processes, forecasting, etc. That is why the use of neural networks is relevant
for the analysis of factors influencing the efficiency of oil transportation companies,
along with traditional methods. In a series of recent works [3; 1; 14; 13], the authors
have demonstrated the possibility of using the theory of complex systems and a set of
developed analysis tools to calculate the corresponding measures of system
complexity. These complexity measures make it possible to differentiate the systems
according to the degree of their functionality, to identify and prevent critical and crisis
phenomena.</p>
        <p>Let us move on to the development of the neural network. For this purpose, use the
module Neural Networks of the Statistica software package.</p>
        <p>In the Neural Networks window, we set the following parameters:
─ type of problem – “Regression”;
─ as input parameters, according to the correlation analysis, we use: the average tariff
on the transit transportation of petroleum products by the main pipelines for 1 t.
net; average tariff on the transportation of petroleum products to refineries by main
pipelines, UAH for 1 ton net; residual value of the fixed assets, thousand UAH;
level of fixed assets depreciation; proportion of wage costs in the total amount of
costs, %; proportion of electricity costs in the total amount of costs, %; proportion
of capital investment in equipment repairs;
─ the economic efficiency is taken as the input parameter (the resulting feature).
Then, with the help of the Solution Wizard, we go to the window for building Neural
Networks.</p>
        <p>In the Solution Wizard window, we set the parameters for creating neural
networks:
─ test 100 networks and save only the top 5;
─ the types of neural network architectures, used for modeling, are multilayer
perceptron, generalized regression network and linear network;
─ run the analysis. We analyze the results of neural network modeling aimed at
maintaining regression based on the detailed model results (table 5).
According to the correlation indicators, shown in table 6, the best model is the first
model – a multilayer perceptron, with the architecture MLP 6-10-1. The MLP 6-10-1
architecture identifies a model with 6 input variables, one output variable and one
hidden layer containing 10 hidden neurons. Having investigated and analyzed the
results obtained in table 6, we can make conclude that the constructed models work
evenly as the correlation coefficients of the test sample are approximately at the same
level. The Statistica Neural Networks program provides the ability to analyze the
sensitivity of the network to input variables. This procedure allows us to make
conclusions about the relative importance of the input variables for a particular neural
network and, if necessary, to remove the inputs with low sensitivity. Sensitivity
analysis can be used for purely informational purposes, or to remove entries.</p>
        <p>Sensitivity analysis brings some clarity to the usefulness of the certain variables. It
allows identifying the key variables, without which analysis is impossible, and
identifying those that can be safely excluded from consideration.</p>
        <p>Therefore, let us analyze the results of the input variable sensitivity to the output
variable and see which variables are included in our model (table 7), and the standard
prediction of the neural network, i.e. the predicted values for the resulting variables in
the proposed models (table 8).</p>
        <p>Thus, we can see that the chosen model has minor errors, and therefore it can be
called reliable. The rest predicted results of the neural network models calculations
are presented in tables 9-11.
х7 - the share x6 - the level of х7 – the share х2 – average tariff for х13 – the share of
of electricity depreciation of of salary costs transportation of oil capital
costs in total fixed assets; in total costs,%; products to refineries investment in
costs,%; by main pipelines, equipment</p>
        <p>UAH for 1 t. netto; repairs;</p>
        <p>Predictions spreadsheet for Y - efficiency of the enterprises business model (Spreadsheet1_(Recovered))
Samples: Train, Test, Validation</p>
        <p>Y - efficiency of Y - efficiency of Y - efficiency of
the enterprises the enterprises the enterprises
business model - business model - business model</p>
        <p>Abs. Res. Abs. Res. Abs. Res.
1. MLP 6-10-1 2. MLP 6-7-1 3. MLP 6-11-1</p>
        <p>Y - efficiency of
the enterprises
business model</p>
        <p>Abs. Res.
4. MLP 6-5-1</p>
        <p>Y - efficiency of
the enterprises
business model</p>
        <p>Abs. Res.
5. MLP 6-7-1</p>
        <p>Y - efficiency of the</p>
        <p>enterprises
business model</p>
        <p>Abs. Res.</p>
        <p>Ensemble
efficiency based on the various developed architectural neural networks.</p>
        <p>Predictions spreadsheet for Y - efficiency of the enterprises business model (Spreadsheet1_(Recovered))
Samples: Train, Test, Validation</p>
        <p>Sample Y - efficiency of the Y - efficiency of the Y - efficiency of the Y - efficiency of the Y - efficiency of the Y - efficiency of
enterprises enterprises business enterprises business enterprises business enterprises the enterprises
business model - model - Squared model - Squared model - Squared business model - business model
Squared Res. Res. Res. Res. Squared Res. Squared Res.
1. MLP 6-10-1 2. MLP 6-7-1 3. MLP 6-11-1 4. MLP 6-5-1 5. MLP 6-7-1 Ensemble
efficiency based on the various developed architectural neural networks.
Predictions spreadsheet for Y - efficiency of the enterprises business model (Spreadsheet1_(Recovered))
Samples: Train, Test, Validation</p>
        <p>Sample</p>
        <p>Train</p>
        <p>Test
Validation</p>
        <p>Test
Train</p>
        <p>Train
Validation
Validation</p>
        <p>Train
Test</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>Based
on
the investigation
of JSC
“Ukrtransnafta”
business
model economic
efficiency it is possible to draw
conclusions that the accompanying
process of
digitalization of production for the given enterprise is characterized by a number of
problems which arise both at initial stages and in adaptation process. In addition, it
has been proposed to use a synergetic coefficient of digitalization efficiency, which
takes into account the sequence of the enterprise business processes and partial
indicators of digitalization efficiency of each individual business process. However, it
cannot be
calculated for the
enterprise
under study, as the
processes at JSC
“Ukrtransnafta” production digitalization are currently underway. Taking into account
these circumstances, a system of the previously determined key determinants
factorsfeatures of the impact on the company business model economic efficiency of the oil
transportation enterprise and the resulting features has been developed. According to
the analysis of the impact levels of the selected factors, the main ones have been
determined, which have been used to develop the neural network
models of the
enterprise’s business model economic efficiency. The main factors influencing the
business model efficiency of the studied enterprise are the average tariff on the transit
transportation of petroleum products by main pipelines, UAH for 1 t. net; average
tariff on the transportation of petroleum products to refineries by main pipelines,
UAH for 1 t. net; level of fixed assets depreciation; proportion of salary costs in total
costs, %; proportion of electricity costs in total costs, %; proportion of capital
investment in equipment repair. The regression neural network analysis has proved
six factors that can be used to predict the economy of the oil transportation company
business model economic efficiency. The performed analysis of the neural networks
sensitivity, which indicates the direction and strength of the influence of factors, will
allow the surveyed enterprise to manage the economic efficiency, and the state, in its
turn, to find directions for industry development.</p>
      <p>Line Plot of multiple variables
Predictions spreadsheet for Y - efficiency of the enterprises business model (Spreadsheet1_(Recovered))
in Workbook21 8v*10c
2,4
2,2
2,0
1,8
1,6
1,4
1,2
1,0
0,8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10</p>
      <p>Y - efficiency of the enterprises
business model</p>
      <p>Y - efficiency of the enterprises
business model - Output</p>
      <p>Y - efficiency of the enterprises
business model - Output</p>
      <p>Y - efficiency of the enterprises
business model - Output</p>
      <p>Y - efficiency of the enterprises
business model - Output</p>
      <p>Y - efficiency of the enterprises
business model - Output</p>
      <p>
        Y - efficiency of the enterprises
business model - Output
Thus, comparing the results of this research work and the previous work [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ] we can
draw unambiguous conclusions that according to [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ], the financial efficiency of the
studied enterprise is at the average level, it increases at the end of the analyzed period
mainly due to the profitability component, which is usually a positive trend. Based on
the results of regression neural network analysis, the key factors influencing the
economic efficiency have been identified and ranked, and the optimal neural network
model for forecasting the resulting indicator has been developed, which can be used
for predictions and will allow the company’s management to rationally manage the
economic efficiency at relatively low costs.
      </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Belinskyi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Soloviev</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Semerikov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Solovieva</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Detecting stock crashes using Levy distribution</article-title>
          .
          <source>CEUR Workshop Proceedings</source>
          <volume>2422</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>420</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>433</lpage>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bezat-Jarzębowska</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rembisz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Efficiency-focused Economic Modeling of Competitiveness in the Agri-Food Sector</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proc. - Soc. and Behav. Sci</source>
          .
          <volume>81</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>359</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>365</lpage>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1515/foli-2016
          <source>-0005</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Derbentsev</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Semerikov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Serdyuk</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Solovieva</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Soloviev</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Recurrence based entropies for sustainability indices</article-title>
          .
          <source>E3S Web Conf</source>
          .
          <volume>166</volume>
          ,
          <issue>13031</issue>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1051/e3sconf/202016613031
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Havrylenko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shiyko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Horal</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Khvostina</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yashcheritsyna</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Economic and mathematical modeling of industrial enterprise business model financial efficiency estimation</article-title>
          .
          <source>E3S Web Conf</source>
          .
          <volume>166</volume>
          ,
          <issue>13025</issue>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1051/e3sconf/202016613025
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Herts</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tsidylo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Herts</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Barna</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mazur</surname>
          </string-name>
          , S.-I.:
          <article-title>PhotosynQ - cloud platform powered by IoT devices</article-title>
          .
          <source>E3S Web of Conferences</source>
          <volume>166</volume>
          ,
          <issue>05001</issue>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1051/e3sconf/202016605001
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Khvostina</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Havadzyn</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Horal</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yurchenko</surname>
          </string-name>
          , N.:
          <article-title>Emergent properties manifestation in the risk assessment of oil and gas companies</article-title>
          .
          <source>CEUR Workshop Proceedings</source>
          <volume>2422</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>157</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>168</lpage>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kiv</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Soloviev</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Semerikov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>CTE 2018 - How cloud technologies continues to transform education</article-title>
          .
          <source>CEUR Workshop Proceedings</source>
          <volume>2433</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>19</lpage>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kozmenko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Oliynyk</surname>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Statistical model of risk assessment of insurance company's functioning</article-title>
          .
          <source>Inv. Man. and Fin. Innov</source>
          .
          <volume>12</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>189</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>194</lpage>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Marchi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zanoni</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jaber</surname>
          </string-name>
          , M.Y.:
          <article-title>Economic production quantity model with learning in production, quality, reliability and energy efficiency</article-title>
          .
          <source>Eng. Comp. &amp; Industr. Eng</source>
          .
          <volume>129</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>502</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>511</lpage>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.cie.
          <year>2019</year>
          .
          <volume>02</volume>
          .009
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Modlo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ye</surname>
          </string-name>
          .O.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Semerikov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shajda</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tolmachev</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Markova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nechypurenko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Selivanova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Methods of using mobile Internet devices in the formation of the general professional component of bachelor in electromechanics competency in modeling of technical objects</article-title>
          .
          <source>CEUR Workshop Proceedings</source>
          <volume>2643</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>500</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>534</lpage>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Oliinyk</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kozmenko</surname>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Forecasting and management of gross domestic product</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. of Int. Stud</source>
          .
          <volume>12</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>214</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>228</lpage>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .14254/2071-
          <fpage>8330</fpage>
          .
          <year>2019</year>
          /12-4/
          <fpage>14</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Semerikov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Teplytskyi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yechkalo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Yu.V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kiv</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <source>Computer Simulation of Neural Networks Using Spreadsheets: The Dawn of the Age of Camelot. CEUR Workshop Proceedings</source>
          <volume>2257</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>122</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>147</lpage>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Soloviev</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bielinskyi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Solovieva</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Entropy Analysis of Crisis Phenomena for DJIA Index</article-title>
          .
          <source>CEUR Workshop Proceedings</source>
          <volume>2393</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>434</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>449</lpage>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Soloviev</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Belinskiy</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Complex Systems Theory and Crashes of Cryptocurrency Market</article-title>
          .
          <source>Communications in Computer and Information Science</source>
          <volume>1007</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>276</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>297</lpage>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Teplická</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Comparison of Methods for Pricing of the Product and its Impact on Economic Efficiency of Enterprise</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proc. Econ. and Fin</source>
          .
          <volume>34</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>149</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>155</lpage>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/S2212-
          <volume>5671</volume>
          (
          <issue>15</issue>
          )
          <fpage>01613</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>5</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zakharov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jämsä-Jounela</surname>
          </string-name>
          , S.-L.:
          <article-title>Iterative optimization of the economic efficiency of an industrial process within the validity area of the static plant model and its application to a Pulp Mill</article-title>
          .
          <source>Computers &amp; Chemical Engineering</source>
          <volume>35</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>245</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>254</lpage>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          ). doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.compchemeng.
          <year>2010</year>
          .
          <volume>10</volume>
          .010
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>