<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Ontological Analysis of Weathering</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Lucas Valadares Vieira</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Fabr´ıcio Henrique Rodrigues</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Mara Abel</string-name>
          <email>marabelg@inf.ufrgs.br</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>CENPES - Petrobras - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>lucasvaladares@petrobras.com.br</string-name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Weathering is an event that changes rocks and sediments when they are exposed to the Earth's surface conditions. This paper presents an ontological analysis and proposes a model for this type of event, based on the Unified Foundational Ontology and specializing concepts from the GeoCore ontology. The proposed model details the two main types of weathering processes (i.e. Physical Weathering and Chemical Weathering) and describes them in terms of transitions between situations, detailing the involved continuants and the properties that are affected, as well as how they are arranged in the situations connected by such processes. With this structure, the result of this work can help in tracing the past states of sediment and rocks before they are transformed into a weathering event and helps modelers to understand how to model physical occurents.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>A good ontology model of events1 can aid in solving a variety of problematic tasks, such
as dealing with temporal issues in information retrieval (e.g., in a large information
repository which describes the states of a same entity in distinct moments, retrieve the currently
valid state of a given entity) and processing or inferring past configurations of state of
affairs based on the current state and a sequence of events that affected it. The oil and gas
industry deals frequently with this kind of problem, on reservoir geology studies, and can
benefit from accurate ontological models of geological events.</p>
      <p>Geology, as most of natural sciences, is moving from an empirical approach of
manually capturing and analyzing information to a more descriptive and quantitative
model of work. The new approach demands a crescent digitalization of geological
information, which requires an underline set of formal models for systematically acquiring
and processing information. Moreover, the geologist activity is strongly based on
abductive reasoning, trying to understand past events that bring the rocks and sediments to the
current situation. The interpretation of these events allows geologists to create models
of past environmental conditions and the evolution of them through time, which supports
modeling the 3D distribution of reservoirs. Formal ontologies play a central role in this
scenario, both for offering uniform representation of data as well as for allowing computer
applications to simulate the interpretation reasoning of the geologist.</p>
      <p>1In this work we will use the terms event, process, and occurrent interchangeably to refer to the things
that happen in time.</p>
      <p>Copyright © 2020 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).</p>
      <p>Sedimentology is a sub-field of the Geology domain concerned with studying
sediments, sedimentary rocks, and the events they participate in the natural world.
Sedimentary rocks are important for the economy, as they are bearers of oil and gas, and some ores
(coal, placer diamond, and gold). Therefore, understanding the processes that create and
modify sediments and sedimentary rocks is an important part of geologist activity.</p>
      <p>Weathering is one of these sedimentary processes, and it congregates all chemical
and physical processes that affect rocks and sediments due to the influence of the weather.
Weathering is important as the first process at the beginning of the sedimentary part of the
rock cycle. It is weathering that breaks igneous and metamorphic rocks into the particles
that will eventually become a sedimentary rock. Weathering also modifies sediments and
sedimentary rocks, becoming relevant for petroleum geology as this process can either
enhance rock porosity, forming networks of highly permeable karsts, or close porosity,
forming layers that will act as barriers for hydrocarbon flow.</p>
      <p>
        In this context, this paper presents an ontological analysis and proposes an
ontological model for the process of weathering, covering its two main types: physical
weathering and chemical weathering. The model is based on the Unified Foundational
Ontology (UFO) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Guizzardi 2005</xref>
        ] and specializes concepts of the GeoCore Ontology
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Garcia et al. 2020</xref>
        ] and it is intended to (i) help in identifying the chain of events that
led the rocks and sediments to the actual situation, (ii) identify the participants and the
roles they play in the process, and (iii) indicating the observable properties that change in
weathering processes.
      </p>
      <p>The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: in section 2 we bring a brief
introduction to the UFO and GeoCore concepts used; in section 3 we describe weathering
from the domain perspective; in section 4 we present the ontological analysis and
proposed model for the weathering event; in section 5 we discuss related work; finally, in
section 6 we present the most relevant aspects brought up by this work and present our
final remarks.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. Background on the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO) and GeoCore Ontology</title>
      <p>
        [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Guizzardi 2005</xref>
        ] has proposed UFO as a philosophically and cognitively well-founded
reference ontology, which provides a set of meta-types to classify the universals of
a domain, based on the meta-properties of rigidity, relational dependence,
provision of a principle of identity, provision of a principle of individuation defined by
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Guarino and Welty 2000</xref>
        ]. This taxonomy covers two broad categories: continuant
universals and occurrent universals. Continuant universals gather the individuals that are
wholly present at any time they are present, as a person, a rock or a portion of water. The
continuant universals are further divided into object universals, whose instances are
existentially independent continuants (e.g., a person, a portion of water) and moment types,
whose instances only exist in other individuals (e.g., the weight of a rock, the marriage
between two individuals). Moment types include both intrinsic moment types, such as
quality types (whose instances inhere in a single entity and have a value on a quality
structure, e.g. weight) and relator types, comprising relational moments which depend on
a plurality of individuals and mediate them, allowing the existence of a material
relationship (e.g. a contract). Moments are useful in our approach because we use them to detect
changes that the events cause in continuants.
      </p>
      <p>
        Concerning occurrent types, they gather things that unfold in time,
accumulating temporal parts, and that are existentially dependent on the objects that participate in
them. To account for this notion, UFO defines the concept of event as the transition from
an initial situation that triggers the event (e.g., some water exposed to below freezing
temperature triggers a freezing event), to an ending situation that the event brings about (e.g.
a wet soil after raining) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Guizzardi et al. 2013</xref>
        ]. In this context, a situation is regarded as a
particular configuration of a part of reality which can be understood as a whole, gathering
a set of objects and the moments that inhere in them [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Guizzardi et al. 2013</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        In UFO, an event is also regarded as anything that happens to a selected set of
focal qualities in a particular spatiotemporal region [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Guarino and Guizzardi 2016</xref>
        ]. Besides
that, continuants may play different historical roles in the context of the event they
participate in, representing the way its participation influences the event. One special type of
participation is that of creation, which means that the continuant that participates in such
a way is created during the considered event [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Almeida et al. 2019</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        The GeoCore ontology [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Garcia et al. 2020</xref>
        ] formally defines the main entities in
the Petroleum Geology domain. Garcia and colleagues have conceived a core ontology
to clarify the meaning of highly used geological terms and provide a set of entities that
the modeller could specialize to cover any other entity in the macro scale of geological
interpretation to build a Geology model. The ontology offers a conceptual background
for developing or integrating more specialized Geology ontologies.
      </p>
      <p>The GeoCore covers naturally existent material entities produced by a geological
process. The main structure embodies the dichotomy between the independent
continuants Geological Object and Earth Material. Geological objects are material entities with
unifying principle and are constituted by Earth Material. Earth Material is an
homeomerous amount of matter with no unifying or countable principles, including rock, mineral
and fluid, such as water, gas and oil. Existentially dependent entities complete the
ontology: Geological Structure (internal or external arrangement of objects), Geological
Contact (surface shared by two geological objects), Geological Boundary (surface that
delimits an amount of matter in an object) and Geological Age (geological age of
creation).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. The geological weathering process</title>
      <p>Rocks and sediments are constituted by an aggregate of particles. When they are formed,
the temperature and pressure conditions play a determining role in defining which
minerals will constitute the particles. Most rocks are formed on pressure and temperature
conditions very different from those happening at Earth’s surface. Frequently this
mineral assemblage is chemically unbalanced with surface conditions. Therefore, while being
exposed to surface conditions, the rock mineral composition might change and the bonds
holding the rock’s particles together might break, forming new particles. This process
of changing rocks, sediments, and their components due to Earth’s surface conditions is
called weathering. The process of weathering is representative, in terms of requirements
for ontology modeling, to most of the physic-chemical processes described in natural
sciences. They request a set of conditions in the environment to happen and a trigger to
start.</p>
      <p>
        Weathering is divided in two kinds of processes, depending on the kind of change
on the involved entities. Physical weathering is the disintegration of the rock, breaking
it in smaller particles and resulting in the formation of sediments [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Boggs et al. 1995</xref>
        ].
Chemical weathering is the process that changes the composition of the rock or sediment
by altering the minerals and/or by dissolving them [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Boggs et al. 1995</xref>
        ,
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Selley 2000</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Physical weathering involves changing in the forces acting on rocks and
sediments, breaking the bonds that keep rocks and sediment’s particles indurated.
This might happen with the participation of water as in freezing-thaw weathering
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Nicholson and Nicholson 2000</xref>
        ,
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Robinson and Johnsson 1997</xref>
        ], when the water inside
the rock or sediment freezes and melts; and in wetting and drying weathering when clay
minerals composing some rocks and sediments absorbs and releases water with changing
climate. Biological entities like plant roots or animals can also cause physical weathering,
by increasing the stresses inside the rock or actively breaking them. Physical weathering
can also happen only by changing the temperature and pressure in the rock, as in
insolation weathering, when differences in temperature cause enough stress to break the rock;
and in stress-release weathering, when the reduced pressure in surface conditions causes
the rock to expand and break.
      </p>
      <p>Chemical weathering is a process that changes the chemical composition of the
rocks or sediments. It happens due to the chemical unbalance of the minerals constituting
a rock or sediment with meteoric waters near Earth’s surface. This leads to different
reactions of water with specific minerals. It can cause the dissolution of some minerals,
and formation of more stable minerals by hydrolysis, oxidation, hydration, dehydration,
and other less common processes. The most common minerals appearing in chemical
weathering are clay minerals and iron and manganese oxides. The changes in composition
gradually reduce the consolidation of the rocks, assisting in the disaggregation of the rock.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. Ontological analysis of weathering</title>
      <p>
        This section presents an ontological model for the process of weathering. It first presents
the main types of continuants which are involved in this process. Then it brings a
description of the weathering process, detailing its main subtypes in terms of their triggering
and resulting situations, as well as their participants. The diagrams presented use the
OntoUML language [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Guizzardi 2005</xref>
        ] to represent the types of things involved in the event
and a visual notation based on [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Costa et al. 2006</xref>
        ] to exemplify prototypical instances of
the event and of the involved continuants in order to clarify the dynamics of the event
(i.e., what is altered between the initial and resulting situations).
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>4.1. Continuants</title>
      <p>The process of weathering is materialized by changes in the geological objects constituted
by rocks and sediments, and as a result of the action of water, biological entities or solar
radiation. Following we present the definition of the types of continuants used in this
analysis (Figure 1).</p>
      <p>GC:Earth Material is defined in the GeoCore ontology as gathering instances
of natural amounts of matter which are generated by a Geological Process. GC:Earth
Material has two specializations, GC:Earth Fluid (which is also part of the GeoCore
ontology) and Earth Solid, gathering materials that naturally occur in fluid or solid state
respectively. As these concepts are rigid but do not provide an identity criterion for its
instances, they are classified into UFO’s Category.</p>
      <p>
        Among the earth fluids we have Water, which we defined as a portion of a fluid
composed by a portion of the homonymous chemical substance and other molecular
quantities that may be dissolved in it. Given that water provides a principle of identity
criteria for their instances and has an individuation principle based on the notion of chunk
(i.e., A maximally self-connected portion of matter), it is classified as a UFO’s
Quantity [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Guizzardi 2005</xref>
        ]. Water may also have the historical role of Meteoric Water, which
associates it with an Earth’s surface event (e.g., a portion of water originated from rain).
      </p>
      <p>
        Earth Solid is specialized into GC:Rock and Sediment. GC:Rock is
ontologically defined by the GeoCore ontology [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Garcia et al. 2020</xref>
        ] and each of its instances is an
amount of consolidated solid matter constituted by an aggregate of mineral or biological
particles and formed by geological processes. Sediment is an amount of unconsolidated
solid matter constituted by an aggregate of mineral or biological particles and also formed
by geological processes. The term sediment is used in geological literature to refer to
different entities: it can be synonym to grain (a kind of particle), it can refer to a collective of
particles (e.g. the sediment carried by a flow), or to the motionless mass of loose particles
on the ground. Here we model sediment as the latter definition.
      </p>
      <p>
        Both Sediment and GC:Rock are close to the idea of Amount of Matter in DOLCE
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Masolo et al. 2003</xref>
        ]. Thus, it seems that there is no suitable metatype in UFO for them.
They are not portions of matter (UFO’s quantities) since an amount of rock/sediment
remains numerically the same even though it is divided in several portions. They could be
seen as UFO’s Collectives formed by collections of particles, but it is not the case either
since the relation between rock/sediment and the collection of particles they are made of
is that of constitution
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">(as discussed in [Garcia et al. 2019])</xref>
        , with the constituted entities
presenting emergent properties that cannot be found on the particle aggregate by itself
(e.g., the porosity of a rock is a result of the organization of the particles). Finally, they
do not seem to fit into UFO’s Kind since it is hard to see them as functional complexes.
So, in this work we did not assert any metatype for either of these types and leave it as
future work.
      </p>
      <p>In this work we characterize Earth Material by its geochemical composition (GC)
and mass, which are both UFO’s Qualities. GC represents the volumetric proportion
of the different types of molecules in the entity. This quality is related to the minerals
that constitute the particles forming an Earth Solid, and to the mixture of molecules in
instances of Earth Fluid. Mass is a quality that corresponds to the homonymous physical
property of an amount of matter (i.e., the quantification of the mass of an amount of
matter). In addition, earth solids are characterized by their petrographic composition
(PC) and particle size average (PSA). PC is a UFO’s Quality representing the volumetric
proportion of the pores and of each kind of particles in an Earth Solid. PSA is also a UFO’s
Quality, which represents the average size of the particles in an Earth Solid. Besides that,
Rock Object is characterized by its fracture density (FD), a UFO’s Quality representing
the number of fractures per volume of rock in the object.</p>
      <p>The main interaction that happens during a weathering process is that of an Earth
Fluid filling the pores of an Earth Solid, represented by a UFO’s Relator called pore
filling. The infilling fluid plays the role of Pore Fluid (a UFO’s RoleMixin) or the more
specific Pore Water role (a UFO’s Role) when such fluid is a portion of Water.</p>
      <p>Besides earth materials, we also included geological objects in our model since
they are the focal participants of the weathering processes (i.e., it is the involved
geological objects that endure the process, preserving their identity despite the qualitative
changes). GC:Geological Object is part of the GeoCore ontology and gathers instances
of material objects constituted by some GC:Earth Material. We specialized it into the
Geological Solid Object, which gathers instances of GC:Geological Object constituted
by some Earth Solid. As both of these types are rigid but do not provide an identity
criterion for its instances, we classified them as UFO’s Category. On top of that, we define
Rock Object and Sediment Object as a Geological Solid Object constituted by GC:Rock
and by Sediment, respectively. These are rigid types that represent functional complexes
into which rock and sediment amounts are arranged (e.g., geological layers, various types
of sediment deposits) and that provide identity criterion for its instances, so that they are
classified as UFO’s Kind.</p>
      <p>
        It is noteworthy that in this work we use the notion of constitution described in
[Garcia et al. 2019], which is based on
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Baker’s view [Baker 2007</xref>
        ]. In [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Baker 2007</xref>
        ]
constitution is a relation of genuine unity, so that the constituted object may have some its
properties derivatively from its constituent, which applies for our work (e.g., a Rock
Object is characterized non-derivatively by its own qualities, such as fracture density, and
derivatively by the qualities of its constituents, such as mass or petrographic
composition).
      </p>
      <p>
        Apart from earth materials and geological objects, Biological Entity type gathers
living things or its parts, including entities with diverse principles of identity such as roots
of plants or any burrowing and sediment feeding animals. Thus, it is also a rigid concept
that does not provide an identity criterion for its instances, being classified as a UFO’s
Category. Completing the inventory of continuants, Solar Radiation gathers portions of
energetic radiation, constituted by photons and other particles emitted by the Sun and we
classified it into UFO’s Quantity. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Guizzardi 2005</xref>
        ].
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>4.2. Weathering model</title>
      <p>As previously described, Weathering is a process that involves the interaction of an
Geological Solid Object and some environmental element that results in change of
characteristics or the creation/destruction of a Geological Solid Object. It is triggered by a
Geological Solid Object exposed to surface conditions situation and brings about a Weathered
Geological Solid Object situation.</p>
      <p>
        There are a variety of classification criteria according to which we can specialize
types of occurrent [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Rodrigues and Abel 2019</xref>
        ]. Regarding Weathering, it is specialized
according to the type of focal qualities [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Guarino and Guizzardi 2016</xref>
        ] that are affected
during the process. Thus it is a Physical Weathering when it affects mechanical qualities
of the weathered solid (e.g., its petrographic composition, granularity of a sediment).
Alternatively, it is a Chemical Weathering when the process affects chemical qualities
of the solid (e.g., its geochemical or petrographic composition). These two types form a
complete partition over the Weathering type (Fig. 2A).
      </p>
      <p>Both mechanical and chemical qualities may be affected in a single occurrence
of Weathering. In such cases, Weathering unfolds as a complex event, composed of
simultaneous subprocesses of Physical Weathering and Chemical Weathering (Fig. 2B).
With that, the triggering and ending situations of such occurrences are composed of the
triggering and ending situations of its subprocesses. These subprocesses and their initial
and ending situations are detailed in the following sections.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>4.3. Physical weathering model</title>
      <p>In a Physical Weathering event (Fig. 3A) a Geological Solid Object is mechanically
fragmented due to physical stresses associated with surface environmental conditions. Thus,
this event is triggered by a situation of Geological Solid Object exposed to physical stress
due to surface exposition, that mandatorily has the presence of the Geological Solid
Object that will be broken into smaller pieces. In addition, Water, Biological Entities, and/or
Solar Radiation are also present when they act as the agent changing the forces in the
object, but they suffer no change in its properties during the event. The Physical
Weathering event brings about a Broken-down Geological Solid Object situation containing the
instances of Geological Solid Object modified or created during this process. Physical
Weathering can also be specialized into Rock Physical Weathering and Sediment
Physical Weathering (Fig. 2A), according to the type of Geological Solid Object present in its
initial situation (i.e., rock or sediment object).</p>
      <p>
        A Rock Physical Weathering (Fig. 3B) is triggered when the Geological Solid
Object that is present in the initial situation is a Rock Object, being a Rock exposed to
physical stress due to surface exposition situation. This event provides the historical role
of Source Rock for the instance of Rock that constitutes the Rock Object that is suffering
the weathering. It is important to make clear that, though being referred by the same term,
this role has nothing to do with that of a rock in a petroleum system as the generator of
hydrocarbons [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Abel et al. 2015</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>A Rock Physical Weathering might lead to three different resulting situations
depending on the intensity of the physical stresses applied in the rock, the duration of the
event and the fragility of the rock. The first possible outcome is a Broken-down rock
situation, in which the initial rock object is fractured, being broken in several pieces (though
it remains as the same, single object). The Rock Object in the initial and final situations
have the same PC and GC value. However, the new fractures on the final rock object
increases the value of its FD. This case is exemplified in the Fig. 3D.</p>
      <p>A second possible outcome of a Rock Physical Weathering event is a
Brokendown sediment situation, in which a single instance of Sediment Object is present. In
this case, the rock object in the initial situation is broken in so many small parts that it
can no longer be regarded as a rock object, but rather the aggregate of such little parts
constitutes a new amount of Sediment, which constitutes the new Sediment Object that is
created during the event. This Sediment Object has the same GC value as the initial rock
object, as its particles are made of the same minerals, but it has a different PC value, as
the proportion and kind of pores and particles is altered with the fragmentation. The mass
value of the initial rock instance and the final sediment instance are the same.</p>
      <p>The third possible outcome of a Rock Physical Weathering event is a Broken-down
sediment and rock situation, in which an instance of Sediment Object is created and the
Rock Object instance remains. Fig. 3E exemplifies an occurrence of a Rock Physical
Weathering bringing about this type of situation. In the situation described, the sediment
and the rock objects have equal GC value as the initial instance of Rock Object, but the
Sediment Object created has different PC value. The mass values of the sediment and
rock objects are both lesser than the previous mass value of the instance of Rock Object
(since the new object result from the fragmentation of part of the initial one).</p>
      <p>A Physical Weathering event can also be specialized in a Sediment Physical
Weathering event (Fig. 3C). It is triggered by a Sediment exposed to physical stress
due to surface exposition situation, in which an instance of Sediment Object is present.</p>
      <p>In this event, the particles that form the sediment that constitutes the object are
mechanically broken into smaller particles, bringing about a Broken-down sediment situation at
the end. The instances of Sediment Object in both initial and final situations are the same,
with a lesser PSA value at the end. The PC value of the sediment object might change or
not, depending on whether or not the break-up of the particles changes their type, but the
GC and mass values remain unaltered. An instance of this event is represented in Fig. 3F
in which only the PSA value of the Sediment Object instance is changed by the event.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>4.4. Chemical weathering model</title>
      <p>A Chemical Weathering event is triggered by an Geological Solid Object infilled with
Meteoric Water situation (Fig. 4A), in which an instance of Geological Solid Object is
infilled by an instance of Meteoric Water (which plays the role of Pore Water). Then, it
brings about a Chemically altered Geological Solid Object situation with the presence
of the same instance of Geological Solid Object and a new instance of Meteoric Water.
During this event the Geological Solid Object is submitted to a chemical unbalance with
the water filling its pores, resulting in exchange of mass between the Geological Solid
Object and the Meteoric Water. This is materialized by a change of GC, Mass and PC
values of the participants in the initial and final situations. An instance of this event is
represented in Fig. 4B.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>5. Related Work and Discussion</title>
      <p>Since petroleum reservoirs are in subsurface and data is scarce for direct analysis,
geoscientists need to propose models to the distribution of rock bodies. The traditional approach
is building statistical models that describe the geometry and distribution of rock bodies,
associating them to flow properties in order to evaluate the production capability of wells.
However, this method may hide important properties of reservoirs concerning spatial
disposition evaluation and internal barriers for flow, leading to production misevaluation.
Thus, recently, efforts have been directed to complement the quantitative approaches with
knowledge-based models, including ontologies.</p>
      <p>
        An example is the work in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Le Bouteiller et al. 2019</xref>
        ], which proposes a
graphbased ontology with nodes representing either characteristics of geological deposits or
phenomena that may affect such deposits. Directed edges in the graph indicate the
impact of a phenomenon over a deposit characteristic, corresponding to possible causes of
or explanations for the presence of such characteristic. This ontology does not explicitly
include weathering, but covers some related and/or overlapping processes, such as
diagenesis and erosion. Despite covering an extensive list of rock-body properties and related
processes, the approach lacks ontological rigor and seems to focus on epistemological
aspects and inference rules rather than ontological concerns.
      </p>
      <p>
        An account of the process of weathering can be found on EcoLexicon
(ecolexicon.ugr.es), a multilingual thesaurus specialized in the environmental domain. It is
structured as propositions and knowledge frames that are organized in an ontological
structure, which focuses on perceptual information and semantic relations [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Faber et al. 2011</xref>
        ,
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Gil-Berrozpe et al. 2019</xref>
        ]. Its top-level categories (i.e., object, event, and attribute) are
configured in a prototypical domain event that is described in terms of its agents,
patients and results. With that, Weathering is a type of Decomposition process that affects
Rocks or Minerals, that is caused by Water, (living) Organisms, Solar Radiation or
Atmosphere. It is subdivided into Mechanical Weathering (analogous to our Physical
Weathering), which affects Rock and results in Sediment, and Chemical Weathering, which
results in karsts. This provides a rich structure to contextualize the elements involved in
this process.
      </p>
      <p>
        As pointed out in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Reitsma et al. 2009</xref>
        ], ontologies for Geosciences are usually
more concerned with ‘what’ than ‘why’ or ‘how’, limiting the understanding of evolving
entities in a context, which seems to be the case in the mentioned works. In this sense,
we further the approach adopted in those works. Besides using the description of the
process to frame the involved objects and affected properties, we also define it in terms
of its initial and ending situations. Then, it makes explicit how the process unfolds by
indicating the observable properties that change in the weathering process. of the involved
participants. With that, besides enhancing integration of data collected about a region of
interest into the context of these occurrences, the model also allows the understanding
of sedimentary occurrences where the data is incomplete, leading to the geologists to fill
the gaps of information on the geology records, providing a more complete view of the
exploration area. Moreover, it helps in identifying the chain of events that can lead rocks
and sediments to a given situation, enabling temporal reasoning and simulations.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>6. Concluding Remarks</title>
      <p>This paper presented an ontological analysis and the corresponding model of the process
of weathering, which was developed based on Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO) and
GeoCore Ontology. The model details the two specializations of this event, namely the
physical weathering and chemical weathering, specifying their initial and ending
situations as well as the involved participants and their affected properties.</p>
      <p>By defining the weathering process in terms of its initial and ending conditions,
the presented model can help in describing the chain of events that led the rocks and
sediments to their current situation. Moreover, by indicating the observable properties that
are changed in weathering processes, the model may allow integrating the data collected
about a region of interest into the context of these occurrences. In fact, by defining the
process as the change on properties of its participants or their creation/destruction, we
add a new layer of meaning in relation to what was done in previous work, which can
offer useful insights for those who deal with modeling and simulating events in related
natural domains, such as sedimentology processes. Furthermore, this enriched model
may improve the understanding of sedimentary occurrences where the data is incomplete,
leading the geologists to fill the gaps of information on the geology records, providing a
more complete view of the exploration area.</p>
      <p>Besides that, by proposing the physical weathering event as a truthmaker for the
source rock historical role, the model also contributes to provenance study, i.e., a branch
in geology that aims at identifying the rocks from which the sediments originated. In this
context, the weathering model can be integrated with other event models to rebuild the full
path of sediments. Tracing the source rock of a weathering event that created sediments
can also be directly useful in reservoir characterization, since they reveal characteristics
that influence the quality of the reservoir.</p>
      <p>Given this structure, we believe that this process modelling proposal can offer
useful insights for those who deal with modeling and simulating events in related natural
domains, such as sedimentology processes. Nevertheless, the model presented here is the
foundational stone for modelling this geological process and does not exhaust the theme.
In the current state, the model does not include explicit representations for some
environmental aspects that affect the entities involved in weathering processes. For example, it
does not include temperature and external pressure which are needed to represent
insolation and stress-release weathering, nor does it cover the specific interactions involving
biological entities. Besides that, the model can be improved by a clearer ontological
account of the notions of rock and sediment (since they don’t seem to fit any of the metatypes
provided by UFO), as well as their relation with the objects they constitute, which are in
progress within the research group.</p>
      <p>Finally, future work will focus on detailing more specific types of weathering (e.g.,
freezing-thaw, wetting and drying, insolation, stress-release) as well as classifying it into
more general types of process (e.g., natural process, creation, destruction). Additionally,
we will further the modeling to encompass weathering processes in smaller scales (e.g.,
the effects over grains of sediment). Another horizon of investigation is the uncovering
of the dispositions involved in the triggering of weathering processes in order to better
support reasoning and simulation tasks.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-11">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>The first author thanks Petrobras for supporting this work. This work was financed in part
by the Coordenac¸a˜o de Aperfeic¸oamento de Pessoal de N´ıvel Superior - Brasil (CAPES)
- Finance Code 001, and by the Brazilian Council of Research (CNPq).</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Abel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Perrin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Carbonera</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Ontological analysis for information integration in geomodeling</article-title>
          .
          <source>Earth Science Informatics</source>
          ,
          <volume>8</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>21</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>36</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Almeida</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. P. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Falbo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guizzardi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Events as entities in ontologydriven conceptual modeling</article-title>
          .
          <source>In International Conference on Conceptual Modeling</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>469</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>483</lpage>
          . Springer.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Baker</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The metaphysics of everyday life</article-title>
          . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Boggs</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          et al. (
          <year>1995</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Principles of sedimentology and stratigraphy</article-title>
          , volume
          <volume>774</volume>
          . Prentice Hall New Jersey.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Costa</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P. D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guizzardi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Almeida</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. P. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pires</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and Van Sinderen,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Situations in conceptual modeling of context</article-title>
          .
          <source>In 2006 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW'06)</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>6</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>6</lpage>
          . IEEE.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Faber</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mairal</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and Magan˜a,
          <string-name>
            <surname>P.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Linking a domain-specific ontology to a general ontology</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Twenty-Fourth International FLAIRS Conference.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Garcia</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Abel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Perrin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alvarenga</surname>
          </string-name>
          , R. d. S. (
          <year>2020</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The geocore ontology: A core ontology for general use in geology</article-title>
          .
          <source>Computers &amp; Geosciences</source>
          ,
          <volume>135</volume>
          :
          <fpage>104387</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Garcia</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Carbonera</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rodrigues</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F. H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Antunes</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C. R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Abel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <article-title>What rocks are made of: towards an ontological pattern for material constitution in the geological domain</article-title>
          .
          <source>In International Conference on Conceptual Modeling</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>275</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>286</lpage>
          . Springer.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gil-Berrozpe</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Leo´</surname>
            n-Arau´z,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Faber</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Ontological knowledge enhancement in ecolexicon</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Electronic Lexicography in the 21st Century (eLex</source>
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guarino</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guizzardi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Relationships and events: towards a general theory of reification and truthmaking</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>237</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>249</lpage>
          . Springer.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guarino</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Welty</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2000</year>
          ).
          <article-title>A formal ontology of properties</article-title>
          .
          <source>In International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>97</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>112</lpage>
          . Springer.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guizzardi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models</article-title>
          . Universal Press, Enschede, The Netherlands.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guizzardi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wagner</surname>
            , G., de Almeida Falbo,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guizzardi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Almeida</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. P. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Towards ontological foundations for the conceptual modeling of events</article-title>
          .
          <source>In International Conference on Conceptual Modeling</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>327</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>341</lpage>
          . Springer.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Le</given-names>
            <surname>Bouteiller</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Lafuerza</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Charlety</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Reis</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. T.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Granjeon</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Delprat-Jannaud</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            , and
            <surname>Gorini</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>C.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <article-title>A new conceptual methodology for interpretation of mass transport processes from seismic data</article-title>
          .
          <source>Marine and Petroleum Geology</source>
          ,
          <volume>103</volume>
          :
          <fpage>438</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>455</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Masolo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Borgo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gangemi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guarino</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Oltramari</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Wonderweb deliverable d18 ontology library (final)</article-title>
          .
          <source>ICT project</source>
          ,
          <volume>33052</volume>
          :
          <fpage>31</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nicholson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D. T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nicholson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F. H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2000</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Physical deterioration of sedimentary rocks subjected to experimental freeze-thaw weathering</article-title>
          .
          <source>Earth Surface Processes and Landforms: The Journal of the British Geomorphological Research Group</source>
          ,
          <volume>25</volume>
          (
          <issue>12</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>1295</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1307</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Reitsma</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Laxton</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ballard</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kuhn</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Abdelmoty</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Semantics, ontologies and escience for the geosciences</article-title>
          .
          <source>Computers &amp; Geosciences</source>
          ,
          <volume>35</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>706</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>709</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Robinson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Johnsson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1997</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Chemical and physical weathering of fluvial sands in an arctic environment; sands of the sagavanirktok river, north slope, alaska</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Sedimentary Research</source>
          ,
          <volume>67</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>560</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>570</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rodrigues</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F. H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>and</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Abel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <article-title>What to consider about events: A survey on the ontology of occurrents</article-title>
          .
          <source>Applied Ontology</source>
          ,
          <volume>14</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>343</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>378</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Selley</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2000</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Applied sedimentology</article-title>
          . Elsevier.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>