<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Attitude of Ukrainian Educators toward the Use of Digital Tools for Teaching and Professional Development: Survey Results</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Institute of Information Technologies and Learning Tools of the National Academy of Educational Science of Ukraine</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Kyiv 02100</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The article deals with the results of the survey of the attitude of Ukrainian educators toward the use of the digital tools for teaching and professional development conducted by the Comparative Studies Department for Information and Education Innovations of the Institute of Information technologies and Learning Tools of the NAES of Ukraine in 2019. 178 respondents teachers, school administrators, methodologists and in-service teacher training professors answered on the questionnaire from all-over Ukraine. The content of the study covered the following topics: Internet access on the workplace; professional activities and the use of ICT; using ICT tools in the classroom work and professional development; social networks; cloud services; electronic systems of the educational process management and organization; self-assessment of the level of the digital/ information and communication competence; suggestions and attitudes toward the use of ICT for the professional development and practical work. The answers of the respondents allowed providing proposals on the use of digital tools by teachers in their professional activity. The purpose of the article was to present the survey results and provide suggestions on the professional development of teachers and the assessment of their digital competence.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Teachers</kwd>
        <kwd>Educators</kwd>
        <kwd>Professional Development</kwd>
        <kwd>Training</kwd>
        <kwd>Attitude</kwd>
        <kwd>Survey</kwd>
        <kwd>In-Service System</kwd>
        <kwd>ICT Tools</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Problem statements. Today, in a period of rapid technological development, its impact
on the economy, politics, education and daily life, the ability of a person to use digital
media, communicate and navigate the Internet, social media, know and use their
potential is important. Teachers are the main actors in the education sphere related to the
development of the new generation as individuals able to build a successful life
trajectory. One of the main factors in the process of education is the use of the digital
technologies, in particular the use of the digital tools by the teachers for transferring
knowledge to their students and developing their competencies. According to the New</p>
      <p>
        Ukrainian School Concept the modern teacher should be motivated, able to build
Copyright © 2020 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
partnership and works in a team, provides training and support for the students, is able
to learn all over the life. Moreover the teacher of the New Ukrainian School should be
able to create the collaborative environment with other colleagues, students and
community, and has a proficient level of the digital competence [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. All these features
of the teachers are in the scope of the Ukrainian scholars, policy makers and
stakeholders. The attitude of teachers to the new technologies and their use in the teaching
process reveals the level of teachers’ digital competence.
      </p>
      <p>The study conducted by the Department of the Comparative Studies for
Educational Innovations of the Institute of Information Technologies and Learning Tools of
the NAES of Ukraine in 2019 was aimed at the investigation of the teachers’ attitude
towards the use of the digital tools, in particular, digital teaching and learning
platforms, social media, and digital devices for different purposes in the process of
teaching and professional development. It allowed indentifying gaps in the sphere of
inservice teacher training in terms of their professional development regarding ICT. The
results of the study allowed formulating recommendations for the institutions
conducting training for teachers, school heads on how they can use ICT in teaching
subjects, organizing extracurricular activities, and for their personal professional
development.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Literature Review</title>
      <p>
        The foundations of the ICT use by teachers are grounded in the works of domestic
scientists and practitioners V.Y.Bykov, V.V.Oliinyk, O.Yu. Burov, V.I. Lugovy,
O.M.Spirin and others. The scientists stress mainly on the general approaches to the
ICT use by professionals, their ICT-competence, pedagogical conditions and digital
environment that should be created in the pedagogical and in-service teacher training
institutions for teachers’ development regarding ICT [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. The mentioned authors have
made a significant contribution to the development of scientific and methodological
support for the training and advanced training of computer science teachers and for its
study in other subjects, in particular by distance form; creation of new training
systems and cloud-oriented educational environments, electronic educational resources,
electronic scientific professional publications, textbooks and manuals for different
levels of education.
      </p>
      <p>The approaches to the use of the cloud based and e-based learning tools are
revealed in the works of M.P.Shyshkina, S.G.Lytvynova, N.V.Soroko, O.V.Ovcharuk,
O.O.Gritsenchuk, I.D.Malicka, I.V.Ivaniuk and others [3; 4; 5; 6]. These researchers
investigate forms and methods used by teachers in the process of the development of
the digital learning and teaching environment in educational institutions from the
comparative perspective.</p>
      <p>The purpose of the article is to reveal the teachers’ attitude towards the use of
digital tools for the teaching and professional development through the conducted in
2019 survey, and to formulate the proposals for the system of in-service teacher
training concerning overcoming obstacles and gaps in teachers’ professional development.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Research Methods</title>
      <p>
        A systematic approach to information retrieval, phenomenon study, the data gathering
about the attitude of teachers towards the ICT tools use were applied. Particular
importance was given to the analysis, synthesis of information based on common
scientific methods of analysis and synthesis. In addition, computational methods of
information processing were applied during the data processing survey. Questionnaire was
based on European documents, including the Digital Competence Framework for
Educators (2017) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ].
4
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Research Results</title>
      <p>
        Recent trends in the field of digital technologies are related to such concepts of the
modern world as, digital citizenship, digital consumers, digital governance,
ecommerce, cyber security, Internet of things, Internet of toys, etc. In the context of
these challenges, teachers should prepare young people to be confident in their digital
competence and direct them towards their own development. The need to make
changes in teaching method and approached is revealed in the newly adopted Law on
Education (2017) and New Ukrainian School Concept (2016) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. The Law on
Education states that everyone has the right to access public educational, scientific and
information resources, including the Internet, electronic textbooks and other multimedia
educational resources in the manner prescribed by law [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>The first problem noted in the Concept of New Ukrainian School is the that the
most successful in the labor market in the near future will be professionals who are
able to learn all over the life, think critically, set goals and achieve them, work in a
team, communicate in a multicultural environment and have other modern skills. But
the Ukrainian school is not preparing for this.</p>
      <p>The second problem is that like 10, 20, 50 years ago, the average Ukrainian
student acquires obsolete knowledge at school. In recent years, this volume has increased
tremendously, as has the overall global information flow increased in the world.
Students are only able to reproduce fragments of unsystematic knowledge, but are often
unable to use them to solve life's problems.</p>
      <p>Teachers use mostly outdated didactic tools. The digital gap between teacher and
student is widening. Many educators do not yet know how to research problems using
modern digital tools, work with large data basis, draw and present conclusions,
collaborate online in educational, social and scientific projects. All these above
mentioned issues were proved by the survey conducted. Let’s take a closer look at this
study.</p>
      <p>
        Thus, the survey was conducted in 2019 in the framework of the study
“Development of information and communication competence of teachers in a cloud-oriented
learning environment” (registration # 0117U000198). It was gathered 178
respondents, all responses were anonymous. The survey was constructed on the base of the
Google Forms [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ]. It consists of nine parts and 18 questions. The main parts are:
1. General information about person (work experience, age, status of
institution, gender etc.);
2. Internet access on the workplace;
3. Professional activities and the use of ICT;
4. Using ICT tools in the classroom work and professional development;
5. Social networks;
6. Cloud services;
7. Electronic systems of the educational process management and organization;
8. Self assessment of the level of the digital/ information and communication
competence;
9. Suggestions and attitudes toward the use of ICT for the professional
development and practical work.
      </p>
      <p>The first section of the survey compiled respondents’ personal data. The most part
of the respondents were from 26 up to 40 years old (48,3%) and from 41 up to 55
years old (34,3%). Less respondents were 55 and more years old (14%) and less 25
(3,4%), (Fig.1).</p>
      <p>The next question in the first section of the survey concerned the type of
respondents’ professional activity. The answers were distributed as follows: school
administrators (school heads and their deputies) – 11,2%; professors in the in-service teacher
training institutes – 16,3%; teachers – 71,9%; scientists in the sphere of pedagogic –
3,9%; methodologists – 4,5% and others.</p>
      <p>The following questions were answered on the professional experience record: up to 5
years – 7,3%; up to 10 years – 20,2%; up to 20 years – 32,6%; 20 years and more -39,9 %.</p>
      <p>The gender distribution was 75,35% – female; 24,7% - male respondents.</p>
      <p>The second section concerned the Internet access on the workplace. 88,8%
respondents have sufficient access to the Internet and 10,7% - insufficient, 0,6% does
not have any.</p>
      <p>The next question in this section was on how many time the respondents spend in
the Internet and for which purpose (for professional and personal purposes). The
diagram below shows the distribution of the time in the Internet (Fig.2).</p>
      <p>The left part of the diagram on the Fig 2 is about professional activity, and the
right part is on the personal purposes. As we can see on the diagram, up to 80% of
educators spend up to 5 hours daily for the professional purposes. The next question
on this section was: What search engines (browsers) do you use to get the necessary online
educational resources? 99,4% use Google. Other 0,6% use Yahoo, Ukrnet, Bing and others.</p>
      <p>One of the important question of the survey was about how do the respondents
check the credibility of online learning resources and digital tools. The responses
were the following:
- I use only official and well-known websites in professional environment -71,3%;
- I pay attention to the authors of the resources and the presence of references – 61,8%;
- I pay attention to the content of the source, the structure, the presence of
hyperlinks and navigation – 50,6%;</p>
      <p>- I check through the top ranked resource on Google, and also pay attention to
the URL, for example: gov; edu; com; org. – 43,8%;
- I avoid spam and mailing – 64%;
- I don't check because I don't know how – 1,7%.</p>
      <p>In this case respondents could highlight (mark) one or more proposed options.</p>
      <p>The next sections of the survey concerned the details of the use of digital learning
tools, social networks and cloud computing in the professional activities.</p>
      <p>The third section is devoted to the use of the ICT in the professional activity of
educators. The question was: for what purposes do you need information and
communication technologies and digital tools in your professional activity? The answers
distributed as follows:
- searching for information and educational resources – 93,3%;
- creation and use of audio and video material in lessons / professional activity – 71,9%;
- creating/using didactic materials and learning, to create learning games – 66,9%;
- creating and maintaining a personal Web site, blog - 46,1%;
- implementation of distance learning – 48,9%;
- virtual lab work – 15,2%;
- lesson planning and design – 53,4%;
- creating online questionnaires and tests - 53,4%;
- self education and personal development, scientific research and other – 0,6%.</p>
      <p>Section four contains the question about what kind of ICT tools pedagogues use in
their professional activities. The answers were the following:
- personal computer – 89,3%;
- notebook -75,3%;
- Smart Board – 18%;
- Smart Phone – 69,1%;
- Tablet – 28,1%;
- Multimedia projector, TV – 0,6%.</p>
      <p>The fifth section is about what social networks do the teachers and other educators
use. The diagram on the Fig.3 show that the majority of respondents use Facebook
(91,6%), Instagram (38,8%), LinkedIn (15,7%).</p>
      <p>Section 6 is about the use of the cloud computing tools by educators for the
professional activities. This is show in the diagram (Fig.4).</p>
      <p>Most of the respondents choose Google+ (87,6%) as a most convenient for the
professional purposes. It has to be noted that this service is not available now, but in
the past years teachers has been frequently used Google+ and reflected this in the
answers. They also noted Microsoft Office 365 (43,8%), Padlet (29,2%), and Drop
Box (19,1%) as a most used nowadays.</p>
      <p>The section 7 shows the picture on what ICT software do educators use for the
management and administration of the educational process as well as for the implementation of
teaching process in their institutions. The most popular is the Moodle tools (30,3%) and
Shchodennyk platform (48,3%). Among other tools which are less used (approximately
0,6% each) are: Google Classroom, Netop School, Classrom, Atutor, SMS Global,
OpenEdx, Joomla, Vitrual’na Uchytels’ka, ISUO KURS, Google services, Open EDX,
NetSuport, DayPaD. There is also 0,6% respondents who do not use any of the
instruments.</p>
      <p>The section 8 is about the self assessment of the information and communication
competence. The fig.5 shows the diagram on the self assessment of the educators.</p>
      <p>This part of the study was aimed at the revealing of the feeling of the respondents
about their skills and competencies in using ICT. It was proposed express their vision
regarding their level of the digital competence through 5-grid scale (Fig.4). The self
assessment of the information and communication/digital competence was distributed
in such positions:
- 47,2% (red) - intermediate level;
- 39,3% (yellow) - high level;
-9,6% (green) - expert level;
- 2,8 (blue) – low level;
- 1,1% (violet) – do not know.</p>
      <p>
        The self-assessment of the professional activity of the pedagogues is considered as
a basis of a teacher’s professional competence is his/her practical readiness for
selforganization, which consists of the ability to plan his/her activity, to properly allocate
his/her time and to find the best ways of its organization, the ability of self-control,
self-analysis and self-assessment of its results (Mammon O.V.) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>The section 9 is about the attitude of the respondents toward ICT using in the
teaching process and professional development. Their attitude was assessed on the
10grig scale (from 1- low level, up to 10 – high level positive attitude). 57,5% showed
the high attitude (10); 16,1% support 9th grid of the attitude; other respondents
distributed their attitude between 8th and 5th scale.</p>
      <p>In the final section of the survey it was asked the respondents to express their
suggestions for raising awareness of the use of ICT in their professional activity. The
suggestions were the followings:</p>
      <p>- get acquainted with new technologies on the permanent basis - 78,1% (139
respondents);</p>
      <p>- try to choose a special course on ICT in the post-graduate institution – 59% (105
respondents);
- find time to the experience exchange with colleagues – 56,2% (100 respondents);
- combine my institution’s efforts to create a digital environment – 32,6% (58
respondents);
- I have a personal professional interest in advanced training – 50,6% (90 respondents);
- find time for raising awareness in the sphere of ICT and digital teaching –
43,7% (76 respondents).
5</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Conclusions and Recommendations</title>
      <p>The conducted study allowed to reveal not only the self-assessment of the educators’
digital competence, but also to define how the ICT are used in their professional
activities, which of these ICT are more popular and less popular among teachers. Also
we also learned about respondents’ Internet access and the popularity of the use of
social networks for the professional purposes. It was extremely important to reveal the
respondents’ digital competency self-assessment.</p>
      <p>Therefore, based on the above mentioned in the article, we can draw the following
conclusion: from the teacher’s ability to self-analysis and self-assessment of activity
depends on the growth of his pedagogical skills and competencies, their attitude to
use new technologies and ability to learn all over the life.</p>
      <p>The scientific novelty of the research is in the identifying the gaps in the use of ICT in
teachers’ professional activities and for the professional development: lack of information
and knowledge on the existing tools and instruments, lack of the digital skills and
competence, lack of the information about didactical approaches to the ICT use. This is crucial for
teachers now because of current situation with remote learning in time of COVID-19.</p>
      <p>The essence of the research method is in the data gathering about the attitude of
teachers towards the ICT tools use and their level of awareness, the revealing of their
public opinion in this sphere.</p>
      <p>The practical relevance of the study is to provide recommendations for the system
of in-service teacher training on how to use digital tools for teaching and professional
development:</p>
      <p>In particular, it is suggested to use: web-based resources for teaching the
educational disciplines, including distance courses; systematic collection of information and
using of the educational tools necessary for mastering of academic disciplines
(programs) accessible through the Internet (ex. local area network); a web browser and
other software available to the user. The important is the existence of the web-based
distance learning environment in the educational institutions and in the in-service
teacher training institutes (a systematically organized set of web-based learning
disciplines (programs) as well as web-based resource management software equipped with
the distance learning tools, and distance learning management. It is extremely
important to raise the awareness of school administrators about the organization and
management of the distance learning.</p>
      <p>During the practical classes, it is suggested for teachers to use free cloud storages
(repositories to access working materials and official documents of the school in
shared folders, ex.,School in the Cloud, Shchodennyk and other). The use of
Microsoft Office 365 and Drop Box is also preferable.</p>
      <p>Educators should also pay attention to international digital education platforms
that they can apply to their own practical work. Among them: plus.etwinning.net
(https://www.etwinning.net/en/pub/etwinning-plus.htm), a platform for educators that
unites Ukrainian teachers today; schoolsonline.britishcouncil.org
(https://www.britishcouncil.org/school-resources), a British Council website for
teachers containing teaching materials and resources for teachers; EPals.com
(https://busyteacher.org/15965-e-pals-com-busy-teacher-detailed-review.html), EPals
Global Community is a place where learners connect; knowmyworld.org
(https://knowmyworld.org) offers webinars for teachers to share experiences;
https://www.penpalschools.com; Echo; www.leraar24.nl; http://www.surfspace.nl, the
platforms for exchanging practical experiences among educators in Europe.</p>
      <p>Massive open online courses (MOOCs) are also offered to teachers. Those
teachers who are able to participate in the English speaking environment can attend a
number of teachers’ MOOC free online courses on science, languages and other subjects.</p>
      <p>To assess the level of the teacher’s digital competence, it is suggested to use
online self-assessment tools, including: online barometer of collaboration skills using
cloud services, MENTEP TET-SAT tool (http://mentep.eun.org). It is important to
take into account the Digital Competence Framework for Educators (DigCompEdu)
and the Digital Competence Framework for Citizens (DigComp), which contain
specific descriptors of 8 skill levels and descriptions of digital competence components.</p>
      <p>The following methods of assessing digital competence are proposed: ongoing
assessment; team working with the educational managers and methodologists;
selfassessment; team working with colleagues for evaluation of achievements;
development of the individual work plans; providing observations of the lessons by the skilled
colleagues; conducting regular problem analysis, surveys; creating portfolio;
conducting activity research. The assessment of the digital skills of teachers can be done in
the form of exams, testing, observation of the teaching process etc.</p>
      <p>The results of the survey conducted in 2019 can be useful for the domestic
curricula developers and those practitioners who plan and use digital tools in the
education process. The data shown in the results of the survey prove that the attitude of
teachers towards the use of digital tools for their professional development differs
according to the Internet access, their competencies and motivation. These three
issues should be taken into account by the in-service teacher training system in
Ukraine.</p>
      <p>Further research can be conducted on the comparative studies of European and
domestic experience of the use of digital tools for distance education. The use of the
digital tools for the assessment of teachers’ and students’ digital competence needs
particular attention. Modern educational science requires a broader deployment of
comparative studies and empirical research in the field of teachers’ professional
development regarding the use of ICT. This can help practitioners to construct the
digital teaching environment for their subject areas and enrich their educational
techniques and professional development.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1. The New Ukrainian School.
          <article-title>Conceptual Principles of The Secondary School Reform</article-title>
          , Retrieved from URL: https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/zagalna%20serednya/
          <article-title>novaukrainska-shkola-compressed</article-title>
          .pdf,
          <source>last accessed</source>
          <year>2020</year>
          /07/03 (
          <year>2016</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bykov</surname>
            <given-names>V.Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Burov</surname>
            <given-names>O.Yu.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lytvynova</surname>
            <given-names>S.G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lugovy</surname>
            <given-names>V.I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Oliynyk</surname>
            <given-names>V.V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Spirin</surname>
            <given-names>O.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Development of theoretical bases of informatization of education and practical realization of information and communication technologies in the educational sphere of Ukraine</article-title>
          . Zhytomyr University by I.Franko, (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shyshkina</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>The General Model of the Cloud-Based Learning and Research Environment of Educational Personnel Training</article-title>
          .
          <source>Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing</source>
          .
          <year>2018</year>
          . vol
          <volume>715</volume>
          . Pp.
          <volume>812</volume>
          -
          <fpage>818</fpage>
          . URL: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-
          <fpage>319</fpage>
          - 73210-7_
          <fpage>94</fpage>
          , last accessed 07/03/
          <year>2020</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lytvynova</surname>
            <given-names>S.G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Cloud-oriented learning environment of secondary school</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Cloud Technologies in Education</source>
          . pp.
          <fpage>8</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>12</lpage>
          . Kryvyi Rih,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ukraine</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gritsenchuk</surname>
            <given-names>O.O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ivaniuk</surname>
            <given-names>I.V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ovcharuk</surname>
            <given-names>O.V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kravchyna</surname>
            <given-names>O.Ye.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Leshchenko</surname>
            <given-names>M.P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Malicka</surname>
            <given-names>I.D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Soroko</surname>
            <given-names>N.V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>The development of information and communication competence of teachers in the conditions of cloud-oriented learning environment: a methodical guide</article-title>
          .
          <source>Institute of Information Technologies and Learning Tools of the NAES of Ukraine</source>
          , Kyiv (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hrytsenchuk</surname>
            <given-names>O.O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ivaniuk</surname>
            <given-names>I.V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kravchyna</surname>
            <given-names>O.Ye.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Malytska</surname>
            <given-names>I.D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ovcharuk</surname>
            <given-names>O.V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Soroko</surname>
            <given-names>N.V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>European experience of the teachers' digital competence development in the context of modern educational reforms</article-title>
          . Vol.
          <volume>65</volume>
          , №
          <volume>3</volume>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          ). P.
          <volume>316</volume>
          -
          <fpage>336</fpage>
          . URL: https://journal.iitta.gov.ua/index.php/itlt/article/view/2387, last accessed 27/05/
          <year>2020</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Redecker</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Punie</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union</article-title>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Luxembourg</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8. Law on Education.
          <source>Verkhovna Rada. Bulletin</source>
          , No.
          <fpage>38</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>39</lpage>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ), Retrieved from URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19, last accessed 07/03/
          <year>2020</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9. Questionnaire “
          <article-title>Attitude of educators toward the use of ICT and cloud services in their professional activities, Retrieved from</article-title>
          URL: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfeiqvRfPwqmiX822sQxM5wZFa1Dcrx - IGM1yE26hyRoclR1g/viewform, last accessed 08/03/
          <year>2020</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mammon</surname>
            <given-names>O.V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Self-assessment in the professional development of the teacher: analysis of the concept, structure and the formation process. Origins of pedagogical skill</article-title>
          .
          <source>Collection of scientific works</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>172</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>176</lpage>
          , Poltava National Pedagogical University named after V.G. Korolenko,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Poltava</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>