=Paper= {{Paper |id=Vol-2740/20200357 |storemode=property |title=Automation of Reliability Assessment of Functional Elements of Flexible Automated Production Based on Functional Network Methodology |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2740/20200357.pdf |volume=Vol-2740 |authors=Evgeniy Lavrov,Nadiia Pasko,Olga Siryk,Volodymyr Mukoseev,Svitlana Dubovyk |dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/icteri/LavrovPSMD20 }} ==Automation of Reliability Assessment of Functional Elements of Flexible Automated Production Based on Functional Network Methodology== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2740/20200357.pdf
                      Automation of Reliability Assessment of Functional
                         Elements of Flexible Automated Production
                         Based on Functional Network Methodology

                   Evgeniy Lavrov1’[0000-0001-9117-5727]’, Nadiia Pasko2’[0000-0002-9943-3775]’, Olga Siryk3’[0000-
                              0001-9360-4388]’
                                               , Volodymyr Mukoseev 2,, Svitlana Dubovyk 2
                                              1
                                                Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine
                                       2
                                         Sumy National Agrarian University, Sumy, Ukraine
                                  3
                                    Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine

                           prof_lavrov@hotmail.com, senabor64@ukr.com,
                  lavrova_olia@ukr.net, muksvn@gmail.com,dubovyksg@gmail.com,



                         Abstract. In the article, we propose to consider the reliability of flexible auto-
                         mated production and justify the need for functional decomposition of automat-
                         ed systems, followed by the description of processes in the form of functional
                         networks. We have developed the principles of variant modeling for flexible
                         production systems, the structure, and information and software of information
                         technology for reliable design of automated production. The test proved the ef-
                         fectiveness of the proposed toolkit.

                         Keywords: Reliability, Flexible Manufacturing System, Ergonomics, Com-
                         puter Modeling, Man-Machine, Algorithm of Functioning, Functional Network.


                 1       Introduction

                 Computerization and flexible control systems are becoming a trend of the modern
                 stage of society development [1-4]. Flexible manufacturing radically changes the
                 traditional, years-old approaches to production organization. Current technology,
                 which is based on the differentiation of the process of machining parts for numerous
                 operations and transitions performed on various machines, has lost its economic ad-
                 vantages, because production became much more complex and its range began to
                 change more often. The essence of the concept of flexible automated production is
                 that it allows you to switch from the release of one product to the release of another
                 without reconfiguring the equipment or with the reconfiguration performed in parallel
                 without stopping the release of the current product [5-8]. Unfortunately, the efficiency
                 and reliability of flexible production systems (GPS) do not always meet current re-
                 quirements in practice [1, 8].




Copyright © 2020 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
2      Statement of the task

Unfortunately, the classical theory of reliability [10-14], methods of estimation and
optimization of production systems [10, 15, 16], methods of estimation of reliability
of operational personnel [17-19], do not have in their arsenal a complete library of
models necessary for operative obtaining assessing the functional reliability of the
processes occurring in the GPS.
    In this regard, we aim to provide the possibility of prompt automated analysis of
options (from the point of view of reliability) for organizing the operation processes
in flexible manufacturing systems (FMS), taking into account the reliability of all
structural elements and features of functional elements [6-9].


3      Results

3.1    Analysis of the functional structure of the FMS
For the normal operation of the FMS, a number of functional subsystems must be
included in its composition. Among them:

 Warehouse module is an automatic warehouse, i.e. dispenser with an automatic
  search and transfer system to and from the warehouse, pallets, trays, etc. on vehi-
  cles.
 A transport module is a complex of automatic vehicles together with a system for
  automatically controlling the movement of these vehicles along a route.
 The installation module includes a set of equipment for the installation of work-
  pieces into fixtures and pallets. (These three modules are combined into a
  transport and storage module).
 A tool module is an entire tool economy integrated into a tool management subsys-
  tem.
 The production module is the technological equipment that forms the FMS ma-
  chine tool system.
 The test module consists of a quality control section, including CNC control and
  measuring machines, test benches, etc.
 ACS module is a complex of a central computer, intermediate mini-computers and
  microprocessors in conjunction with all the mathematical and software.


3.2    Development of principles for modeling the implementation of GPS
       function
Modeling and optimizing the operation of FMS becomes possible if you develop a
technology based on the principles of:

 Functional decomposition (division of the process into separate functions - accord-
  ing to subsystems, as described above).
 A formalized description of all processes in the form of functional networks (FN)
  [8, 20-22] (unlike other network methods, for example [23, 24], they allow not on-
  ly describing, but also evaluating and optimizing processes).
 Consideration of possible failures, malfunction of hardware and software, human
  operator errors, as well as modeling diagnostic processes, identifying errors and
  problem situations and restoring normal operation processes.
 Maintaining databases on the reliability of all structural elements (hardware, soft-
  ware, human operator).
 Maintaining databases of typical options for the implementation of functional
  structures (as in Fig. 1).
 Automatic analysis and calculation of the probability of error-free and the proba-
  bility of timely implementation of alternative options for the organization of func-
  tioning.
 Taking into account the influence of individual characteristics of operators on the
  reliability of processes (including qualifications, motivation, workload, intensity of
  activity, category of work severity, etc.).
 Etc.




Fig. 1. A fragment of the description of the operation of the transport and storage system (sym-
                         bols and composition of operations - see [20])


3.3    Description of information technology
Information technology (Fig. 2-7) provides:

 The accumulation of models necessary to obtain estimates of the probability of
  error-free and timely execution (for typical functional units (TFU) and typical
  functional structures (TFS);
 Accumulation of models of typical processes;
 Accumulation of input data for calculations;
 Automatic analysis of operational options;
 Automatic selection of the best option.
3.4      Testing
The developed system was used to design the functioning processes of flexible manu-
facturing sections of machining, as well as several other automated systems [8, 25-
29].




      Fig. 2. A set of information and software automation tools for a reliable design of FMS




               Fig. 3. Scheme of interconnections of tasks of the software package
                            Fig. 4. The main form of the system




Fig. 5. Examples videogram of a computer program. Algorithm of the functioning of the robot
                       manipulator. Variants of functional structures
Fig. 6. Examples videogram of a computer program. Assessment results of the algorithms of
                         the functioning of the robot manipulator




Fig. 7. Examples of videograms. Production module control algorithm: a - functional network;
                          b - reduction report and evaluation result
4       Conclusion

The functional network provides modeling of production management processes,
transport, warehouse operations, and preparation of control programs. It is a conven-
ient tool for assessing the accuracy and timeliness of the implementation of FMS
functions. The information technology developed on the principles of functional net-
work reduction is a convenient tool for a variant analysis of automated control pro-
cesses in FMS.


References
[1]  Zhong, R. Y., Xu, X., Klotz, E. et al.: Intelligent manufacturing in the context of industry 4.0: a
     review. Engineering, 3(5), 616–630, (2017).
[2] Sedov, V. A., Sedova, N. A. and Glushkov, S. V. : The fuzzy model of ships collision risk rating in a
     heavy traffic zone. Vibroengineering PROCEDIA, 8, 453–458, (2016).
[3] Ogurtsov, E. S., Kokoreva, V. A., Ogurtsov, S. F., Usenbay, T. A., Kunesbekov, A. S. and Lavrov,
     E.A.: Microcontroller navigation and motion control system of the underwater robotic complex.
     ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(9), 3110–3121, (2016).
[4] Verkhova, G. V. and Akimov, S. V.: Electronic educational complex for training specialists in the
     field of technical systems management. In Proceedings of IEEE II International Conference on
     Control in Technical Systems (CTS), pp. 26–29, (2017).
[5] Radziwon, A., Bilberg, A., Bogers M., and Madsen, E. S.: The smart factory: exploring adaptive and
     flexible manufacturing solutions. Procedia Engineering, 69, 1184–1190, (2014).
[6] Sawangsri, W., Suppasasawat, P., Thamphanchark, V. and Pandey, S.: Novel Approach of an
     Intelligent and Flexible Manufacturing System: A Contribution to the Concept and Development of
     Smart Factory. In 2018 International Conference on System Science and Engineering (ICSSE), New
     Taipei, pp. 1–4, (2018). DOI: 10.1109/ICSSE.2018.8520029
[7] Wang, S., Wan, J., Zhang D., Li, D. and Zhang, C.: Towards smart factory for industry 4.0: a self-
     organized multi-agent system with big data based feedback and coordination. Computer Networks,
     101, 158–168, (2016).
[8] Lavrov, E., Pasko, N., Krivodub, A. and Tolbatov, A.: Mathematical models for the distribution of
     functions between the operators of the computer-integrated flexible manufacturing systems. In 2016
     13th International Conference on Modern Problems of Radio Engineering, Telecommunications and
     Computer Science (TCSET), Lviv, pp. 72–75, (2016). DOI: 10.1109/TCSET.2016.7451974
[9] Bihi, T., Luwes, N. and Kusakana, K.: Innovative Quality Management System for Flexible
     Manufacturing Systems. 2018 Open Innovations Conference (OI), Johannesburg, pp.40–46, (2018).
     DOI: 10.1109/OI.2018.8535610
[10] Singh, K., Shroff, G. and Agarwal, P.: Predictive reliability mining for early warnings in populations
     of connected machines. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced
     Analytics (DSAA), Paris, pp.1-10, (2015). DOI: 10.1109/DSAA.2015.7344806
[11] Xu, D., Wei, Q., Chen, Y. and Kang, R.: Reliability Prediction Using Physics–Statistics-Based
     Degradation Model. In IEEE Transacti ons on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing
     Technology, 5(11), pp. 1573-1581, (2015). DOI: 10.1109/TCPMT.2015.2483783
[12] Wang, H., Li, R., Miao, J., Zhang, X. and Wang, Z.: Reliability-based design integrating system
     topology and structural components. In 2012 International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk,
     Maintenance,       and     Safety    Engineering,      Chengdu,       pp.      1167–1170,      (2012).
     DOI:10.1109/ICQR2MSE.2012.6246428
[13] Yunm, H., Kahirdeh, A., Christine, M. and Modarres, M.: Entropic Approach to Measure Damage
     with Applications to Fatigue Failure and Structural Reliability. In 2018 Annual Reliability and
     Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), Reno, NV, pp. 1–6. (2018). DOI: 10.1109/RAM.2018.8463066
[14] Gasparyan, A. A. and Komarova, G. V.: Reliability assessment of a technical equipment complex of a
     monitoring system of parameters for electrical equipment taking into account reserve elements. 2018
     IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering
     (EIConRus), Moscow, pp. 632–635, (2018). DOI: 10.1109/EIConRus.2018.8317176
[15] Gai, C.: Design of Product Quality Process Control System Based on Fuzzy Logic. In 2018
     International Conference on Virtual Reality and Intelligent Systems (ICVRIS), Changsha, pp. 335–
     338, (2018,) DOI: 10.1109/ICVRIS.2018.00088
[16] Phillips, C., Sandoval, J., Burton, T. and Jensen, D.: Designing factory support equipment for field
     use. In 2015 IEEE AUTOTESTCON, National Harbor, MD, pp. 15–18, (2015).
     DOI:10.1109/AUTEST.2015.7356459
[17] Di Pasquale, V., Franciosi, C., Lambiase, A. and Miranda, S.: Methodology for the analysis and
     quantification of human error probability in manufacturing systems. In 2016 IEEE Student
     Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD), Kuala Lumpur, pp. 1–5, (2016).
     DOI:10.1109/SCORED.2016.7810093
[18] Rothmorea, P., Aylwardb, P. and Karnona, J.: The implementation of ergonomics advice and the
     stage of change approach. Applied Ergonomics,                    51,      370–376, (2015). DOI:
     10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.013
[19] Cacciabue, P.C.: Human error risk management for engineering systems: a methodology for design,
     safety assessment, accident investigation and training. Reliability Engineering & System Safety,
     83(2) , 229–269, (2014). DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2003.09.013
[20] Adamenko, A.N., Asherov, A.T., Berdnikov, I. L. et al.: Information controlling human-machine
     systems: research, design, testing. Reference book. A.I. Gubinsky & V.G. Evgrafov, eds. Мoscow,
     Russia: Mashinostroenie, 1993. (In Russian).
[21] Chabanenko, P.P.: Research of the safety and efficiency of the functioning of systems “human –
     technics” by ergonomic networks. Sevastopol, Ukraine: Academy of naval forces named after P. S.
     Nahimov, 2012. (In Russian).
[22] Grif, M. G., Sundui, O. and Tsoy, E. B.: Methods of desingning and modeling of man–machine
     systems. In Proc. of International Summer workshop Computer Science, pp. 38–40, (2014).
[23] Drakaki, M. and Tzionas, P.: Manufacturing Scheduling Using Colored Petri Nets and Reinforcement
     Learning. Applied Sciences, 7(2), p. 136, (2017). DOI:10.3390/app7020136
[24] Farah, K., Chabir, K. and Abdelkrim, M. N.: Colored Petri nets for modeling of networked control
     systems. In 2019 19th International Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control
     and     Computer      Engineering (STA),        Sousse,    Tunisia,       pp.    226–230,   (2019).
     DOI:10.1109/STA.2019.8717215
[25] Lavrov, E., Pasko, N., Kozhevnykov, G., Gonchar, V. and Mukoseev, V.: Improvement for
     Ergonomic Quality of Man-Machine Interaction in Automated Systems based on the Optimization
     Model. In 2018 International Scientific-Practical Conference Problems of Infocommunications.
     Science and Technology (PICS&T-2018), Kharkiv, Ukraine, pp. 735–740, (2018).
     DOI:10.1109/INFOCOMMST.2018.8632074
[26] Lavrov, E., Pasko, N., Paderno, P., Volosiuk, A. and Kyzenko, V.: Decision Support Method for
     Ensuring Ergonomic Quality in Polyergatic IT Resource Management Centers. In 2019 IEEE III
     International Conference on Control in Technical Systems (CTS), St. Petersburg, pp. 153–156.
     (2019). DOI: 10.1109/CTS48763.2019.8973265
[27] Lavrov, E., Volosiuk, A., Pasko, N., Gonchar, V. and Kozhevnikov, G.: Computer Simulation of
     Discrete Human-Machine Interaction for Providing Reliability and Cyber-security of Critical
     Systems. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference Ergo-2018: Human Factors in
     Complex Technical Systems and Environments (Ergo-2018) July 4 – 7, 2018, St. Petersburg, Russia,
     pp. 67–70, (2018). DOI:10.1109/ERGO.2018.8443846
[28] Lavrov, E., Pasko, N., Tolbatov, A. and Tolbatov, V.: Cybersecurity of distributed information
     systems. The minimization of damage caused by errors of operators during group activity. In
     Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Advanced Information and Communication
     Technologies-2017 (AICT-2017), pp. 83–87, (2017). DOI:10.1109/AIACT.2017.8020071
[29] Lavrov, E., Pasko, N. and Borovyk, V.: Management for the operators activity in the polyergatic
     system. Method of functions distribution on the basis of the reliability model of system states. In
     Proceedings of International Scientific and Practical Conference ”Problems of Infocommunications.
     Science        and        Technology        (PICS&T–2018),          pp.       423–429,      (2018).
     DOI:10.1109/INFOCOMMST.2018.8632102