<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>BIRDS 2020 - Bridging the Gap between Information Science, Information Retrieval and Data Science</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>University of Bedfordshire</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Luton</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UK">UK</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>University of Padua</institution>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The BIRDS 2020 workshop was a virtual event at SIGIR 2020 as an interdisciplinary workshop for students, practitioners and researchers in Data Science, Information Retrieval and Information Science. BIRDS aimed to foster the crossfertilization of Information Science (IS), Information Retrieval (IR) and Data Science (DS). Information Science (IS) and Data Science (DS) represent two pillars of a wide range of theories, models and methods for information and data processing and management. Roughly speaking, in the spectrum of Data - Information -Knowledge, DS is 'data-driven' while IS is 'user-driven' and mainly concerned with the user's needs to handle information and acquire knowledge to satisfy a certain task, as it is illustrated in Figure 1. IR, naturally and historically concerned with both the system and user side in the world of heterogeneous big data, can be regarded as a kind of bridge. Based on these considerations, the overarching theme of the BIRDS workshop was to look at how IR, DS and IS can complement each other by applying a more holistic approach to these disciplines that go beyond traditional IR or DS or IS alone. Due to the COVID-19 situation BIRDS was held as an online event with 2 keynotes, 2 invited talks and several long, short and position papers that were selected after a peer-reviewing process. By offering two main blocks we tried to accommodate different timezones. Further information can be found on the workshop page at https://birds-ws.github.io/birds2020/index.html .</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>2.1</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Papers</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Keynotes</title>
        <p>Carlos Castillo presented the first keynote on fairness and transparency in
ranking. He first asked whether algorithms can discriminate and looks at different</p>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-1">
          <title>User</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-2">
          <title>Task</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-3">
          <title>Problem</title>
          <p>Interactive IR,
Information
Seeking
Information/Data
Exploration
Sensemaking
Data Technologies – IR,
data mining, machine
learning, ranking
functions, semantic
processing, information
extraction, etc</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-4">
          <title>Information</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-5">
          <title>Needs</title>
          <p>generates
generates
required by
satisfied by
specifies</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-6">
          <title>Knowledge</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-7">
          <title>Information</title>
          <p>turned into</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-8">
          <title>Data</title>
          <p>Databases, Big Data, Data
Streams, Data Warehouses,
Document Repositories,
Digital Libraries, etc</p>
          <p>IS
IR
DS
forms of biases, discrimination and fairness for searchers and those searched. He
then discussed how we can measure fairness in rankings before looking at how
we can create fairer rankings and improve ranking transparency.</p>
          <p>The second keynote was by Nick Belkin on “Challenges and Opportunities
for IS, IR DS in an Era of Information Ubiquity”. He remarked that while IS
and IR have a long history together, there seems to be less interaction between
DS on the one hand and IR and IS, respectively, on the other hand. Apart from
DS, IR and IS, Nick brought another important player into the game,
HumanComputer Interaction (HCI), asking how IS, IR, DS and HCI can support what
he called Radical Personalisation.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>2.2 Invited Talks</title>
        <p>Besides keynotes, BIRDS 2020 had two invited talks. Riccardo Guidotti
discussed the lack of transparency in AI and Machine Learning systems and gave
an overview of research in eXplainable AI (XAI). Xi (Sunshine) Niu introduced
faceted search as an example where IS, IR and DS complement each other.
2.3</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>Research papers</title>
        <p>The following research papers (full, short and position papers) were presented
in two block sessions.</p>
        <p>In the first session, Amit Kumar Jaiswal, Haiming Liu and Ingo Frommholz
discussed how reinforcement learning and the formalism of quantum
probabilities can be used to model information seeking based on Information Foraging.
Steven Zimmerman, Stefan Herzog, Jon Chamberlain, David Elsweiler and Udo
Kruschwitz presented their ideas of a framework for harm prevention in Web
search. Kritika Agrawal and Vikram Pudi looked at how to find grand challenges
and saturated problems in the scientific literature. The last presentation of the
first session was given by Sehrish Sher Khan and Haiming Liu who explored the
impact of user information search behaviour by Affective Design.</p>
        <p>In the second session, Hong Qing Yu discussed his approach for extracting
causal knowledge from UK health web sites to create an AI-enabled healthcare
system. Tuomas Ketola and Thomas Roelleke extended the well-known BM25
formula and proposed BM25-FIC as an enhanced BM25F method that combines
information-oriented search and parameter estimation. Mahmoud Artemi and
Haiming Liu discussed a new CBIR system design based on Vakkari’s three-stage
model to capture user’s feedback at the query formulation stage for content-based
image retrieval. In the final presentation, Massimo Melucci looked at Structural
Equation Modelling as a methodology to investigate the causal relationships
underlying search engines and recommender systems, for instance, to understand
when the system produced biased results.</p>
        <p>Above sessions were followed by a closing discussion about the overall
interdisciplinary topic of BIRDS.
3</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Acknowledgement</title>
      <p>BIRDS 2020 has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant
agreement No 721321 (QUARTZ).</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>