<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Fairness and Transparency in Ranking</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona</institution>
          <country country="ES">Spain</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p />
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>Ranking in Information Retrieval (IR) has been traditionally evaluated from
the perspective of the relevance of search engine results to people searching for
information, i.e., the extent to which the system provides “the right information,
to the right people, in the right way, at the right time.” However, people in
current IR systems are not only the ones issuing search queries, but increasingly
they are also the ones being searched. This raises several new problems in IR that
have been addressed in recent research, particularly with respect to
fairness/nondiscrimination, accountability, and transparency.</p>
      <p>The talk is based on the paper “Fairness and Transparency in Ranking”
published in ACM SIGIR Forum 52(2), p. 64–71, January 20191.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>