<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Invited Talk: Understanding Faceted Search from Information Retrieval, Information Science, and Data Science Perspectives</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Xi Niu</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>University of North Carolina at Charlotte</institution>
          ,
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>14</fpage>
      <lpage>15</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>I am honored to be invited to give a talk on faceted search at the BIRDS Workshop (Bridging the Gap between Information Science, Information Retrieval, and Data Science) at SIGIR 2020. This talk re ects well my research area, which uniquely connects Information Retrieval (IR), Information Science (IS), and Data Science (DS). My research area is attributed to my educational and working background: I obtained my Master's degree in Software Engineering and my Ph.D. degree in Information Science. Now I am a faculty member at a computing department. Historically, there has been a divide between systems and users in the IR research communities. I believe this divide re ects how researchers weigh the relative importance between developing new retrieval algorithms compared to understanding how people search for information. However, there is increasing agreement that the interaction between the users and the search engine is a fundamental part of the IR process. Due to my unique background, I am the researcher who builds models, develops algorithms, as well as runs user studies in order to understand how people seek information. My research has provided evidence that more e ective information access can be achieved by a system that actively supports user interaction. IR researchers make modern search engines or recommender systems rank better, retrieve better, or just function better, and most of today's IR papers are very well-de ned or in other words, narrowly focused. I believe this BIRDS workshop is eye-widening, and will provide thoughts from a bigger, richer, or more comprehensive view of how information retrieval systems can better serve people, not only for their short-term needs but also for their long-term bene ts, not only for the immediate relevance, but also for broader discovery. Our research project on faceted search is an example of how IR, IS, and DS complement each other, o ering a holistic approach that goes beyond each discipline alone. Faceted search has become a common feature on most search interfaces in e-commerce websites, digital libraries, government's open information portals, and so on. Beyond the existing studies on developing algorithms for</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>faceted search and empirical studies on facet usage, this talk investigated user
real-time interactions with facets over the course of a search from information
retrieval, data science and human factor perspectives. It adopted a Random
Forest (RF) model to successfully predict facet use using search dynamic variables.
In addition, the RF model provided a ranking of variables by their predictive
power, which suggests that the search process follows rhythmic ow of a sequence
within which facet addition is mostly in uenced by its immediately preceding
action. In the follow-up user study, it is found that participants used facets at
critical points from the beginning to end of search sessions. Participants used
facets for distinctive reasons at di erent stages. They also used facets implicitly
without applying the facets to their search. Most participants liked the faceted
search, although a few participants were concerned about the choice overload
introduced by facets. The results of this research could be used to understand
information seekers and propose or re ne a set of practical design guidelines for
faceted search. This research demonstrates how we could intersect Information
Retrieval, Information Science, and Data Science to better tackle the traditional
research questions in IR.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>