<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Semantic (Group Formation) PhD Research Proposal*</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Asma Ounnas</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>School of Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton</institution>
          ,
          <country country="UK">UK</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Supervisors: Dr. Hugh C Davis and Dr. Dave E Millard, School of Electronics and Computer Science, University</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2009</year>
      </pub-date>
      <abstract>
        <p>For decades, group formation has been a subject of study in many domains. In learning, teachers form groups of students for different types of collaborative activities. For the formation to be efficient, teachers need take into account any constraints that can influence the performance of the group as a whole and that of the individuals within the group, such as students' previous experience, gender, nationality, and interests. The formation of groups in this context involves the creation of balanced groups in terms of expected performance in addition to maximizing each individual's goal from the collaboration. As the number of formation's constraints grows, forming groups that satisfy these constraints increases in complexity. We know that the Semantic Web (SW) aims at providing a promising foundation for enriching resources with well defined meanings and making them understandable for programs and applications. The potential of the SW in this context has allowed the semantic formation of social networks to be successful [1]. From this point, we trust that the problem of constraint group formation can as well be solved using SW technologies. The question is how to apply the SW vision to the problem, and take the most of its potential to apply it in real life applications such as e-learning. In particular, the problem can be formulated as how can we generate optimal groups by reasoning over possibly incomplete data about the students.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Motivation</title>
      <p>
        To answer the research questions and examine the soundness of the assumed hypotheses, we aim at
building a Semantic Web based system that allows the instructor to automatically form different types of
groups. The formation of the groups generated by the system will then be evaluated based on the quality of
the generated groups, and the robustness of the formation in case of incomplete data.
1. Research Implementation: The system will have three main components:
1. The Ontology: called Semantic Learner Profile (SLP), the ontology is an extension of the FOAF
vocabulary that aims at providing semantic data about the learner [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ] for the formation of all types of
groups. Each student has an extended foaf file that can be updated at any time. This allows them to publish
data about themselves using a URI, which enables the data to be referred to from any dataset. An interface
based on foaf-a-matic (http://www.ldodds.com/foaf/foaf-a-matic.html) will be provided to facilitate the creation
of these profiles. Since FAOF allows the users to define their friends, social connections can be made for
CoPs and SNs formation. As the students can modify their friends’ list at any time, the relationships links
between them allow a dynamic formation which provides the groups with a degree of self-organisation.
2. The Instructor Interface: The teachers will be allowed to choose the constraints they want to base the
formation on. They will be provided by an option that enables them to set constraints on those values and
the relationship between those values. The interface will also enable the instructor to rank the importance of
these constraints to enable the system to manage compromises based on these priorities.
3. The group generator: The group generator will be supported by a set of rules that represent different
formation algorithms that allows reasoning on the data provided by the learners and the teacher in order to
generate effective groups. The system will be empowered by Jena inference engine and SAPRQL for
querying over the data. To allow an effective grouping, students are to be encouraged to create meaningful
descriptions of themselves with as much details as they can. In case they do not provide all required data
for a formation, the instructor will be supported by an option that enables the system to use Semantic Web
mining techniques to look for the missing data in the web and form correlations to the required data.
Moreover, we need to address the data provenance, especially if it is extracted from blogs and web pages.
2. Research Evaluation: To evaluate the system and hence the research hypotheses, we intend to test the
system on real life data by forming groups of students taking a software engineering course (SEG) in the
University of Southampton. To ensure the system is tested for different groupings we also use randomly
generated data, and a simulated population of students. For this, a person generator is created. The
efficiency of the system will be measured based on the quality of the formation provided by the system
which involves: to what degree did each generated group meet satisfied the constraints, how many groups
satisfied the constraints, and what is the systems confidence in generating successful grouping. The same
measures will be applied to evaluate the system’s capability to form groups with incomplete data.
4
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Current Status</title>
      <p>So far, we implemented the SLP ontology, and the random person generator. Both the student interface
and simulated data are currently under development. To support the creation of the simulated data and
prepare for the evaluation of the semantic formation on the real life data next year, we are currently running
an observational study based on two questionnaires one to get information about the student, and the other
to evaluate the group formation. The questionnaires are given to the students taking the SEG course this
year who have already been grouped manually by the teacher based on their previous grades and gender.
This observational pre-study will enable us to compare the results of this manual formation with the
automated semantic formation, which is intended to run as a controlled study on the same course next year.
Moreover, the pre-study will help in getting information about the students’ population for the creation of
the simulated data. For our future work, the core components of the semantic formation system are to be
implemented so that the hypothesis of the research can be evaluated. Future work will include more
research on managing group formation with incomplete data.
5</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Golbeck</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Parsia</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hendler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Trust Networks on the Semantic Web, Proc. of CIA</source>
          . Helsinki, Finland,
          <year>2003</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ounnas</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Davis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H. C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Millard</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D. E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
          <article-title>Semantic Modeling for Group Formation</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of PING workshop at the UM2007</source>
          , Corfu, Greece.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>