As long ago as 1988, Austria introduced the subject \Computer Science" in grade 9. Quite a long time there was solely this one year of mandatory IT-education during school career. In 2011, all European countries had digital education policies in place, either as standalone policies or as part of a national ICT strategy. The strategic weight of these policies remained on nurturing students' digital competences, justi ed by future economic bene ts. For Austria, these changes have not resulted in further computer science education in school. When Austria implemented the new mandatory subject \Digital Education" in September 2018 for all students in lower secondary education, computer science education nally found its way into additional grades. The curriculum covers digital competences, media competences, as well as civic education. Schools can decide if they o er stand-alone subjects or if they implement the curriculum in an integrative way in several other subjects. However, schools still ght the problem who is teaching and how, because most schools just cannot install an extra subject, due to lack of teachers or lack of teaching hours available. This paper reports on the implementation of the subject \Digital Education" in Upper Austrian schools and takes a closer look at rst experiences by evaluating a survey answered by 117 teachers approximately two years after the implementation of the new subject.
Computational thinking tools and methods found their way into multiple
scienti c elds, becoming widespread among scientists long ago [
Concerning the International Computer and Information Literacy Study (ICILS)
30% of the tested German students are \functional digital analphabets",
henceforth they only show rudimentary skills in working with new technologies and
digital devices (as Austria did not participate in the study, Germany was chosen
because both countries start their computer science education by age 10) [
This paper describes related work as well as the implementation of the curriculum \Digital Education" in Austria. In section 4 the methodology and results of a study, conducted in secondary schools in Upper Austria, are characterized. 2
Regarding a nationwide promotion of media literacy, both the EU and UNESCO
act as driving institutions. Consequently, individual nations try to integrate those
recommendations into their own educational reforms and curricula. European
Union nations share lots of common characteristics in their implementation of
digital literacy in educational context [
Regarding a study from 2010 from the university in Dresden, 12 out of 16 states of Germany integrated media literacy or basic concepts of computer science in their curricula. But otherwise there is no nationwide directive for teaching computer science or digital education.
In Switzerland a project called \Lehrplan 21" has been developed to introduce the topic \Media and Computer Science" throughout the school career. The project focuses on \Understanding Media & Responsible Usage", \Basic Computer Science Concepts and problem Solving", as well as \Applied Computer Science".
Shortly after providing each and every student at age 11 and 12 with BBC
micro:bit, England introduced a mandatory subject \Information and
Communication Technology" in 2014. Educational and teaching objectives concentrate
on \Computer Science", \Digital Literacy", and \Information Technology".
Fig. 1. Comparison of the starting age of computer science education between countries
[
Slovakia installed the subject \Informatika" for all students from grade two to eleven by focusing on computational thinking. Poland integrated the topics \Understanding and Analysis of Problems" and \Programming and Problem Solving by Using Computers and other Digital Devices" in their curriculum.
As part of Barack Obama's \Computer Science for All" initiative in 2016, the USA enhanced computer science education from kindergarten until grade 12.
There has not been deeper research in the Austrian curriculum of \Digital Education" due to the fact that it was installed in 2018. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic took other topics to the center of the stage, even if the home-schooling situation forced students and teachers to deal with digital devices.
Furthermore, there are no long time studies concerning digital literacy skills
of students in Austria but Lazonder et al. [
Concerning teacher training at university level, a study of the Austrian
Computer Society (OCG { O sterreichische Computer Gesellschaft) shows that the
suggested 8 to 12 ECTS of digital competences cannot be reached at Austrian
universities { they could merely be counted with 4.7 and are characterised by
the usage of software applications [
In the last two decades the idea of life-long learning gained more and more
importance. According to the EU key competences, \Digital Literacy" is one of those
topics students should master when they nish school. In 2006 \digi.komp", a
model for digital competences, was introduced in Austria. Digi.komp4 describes
the model until grade 4, digi.komp8 states examples from grade 4 until grade 8,
digi.komp12 suggests competences for grades 9 - 12, and digi.kompP
characterizes the model for teachers [
In 2018 the Austrian government published a \master-plan for digitalization"
where three main elds of action are described. Field one concerns curricula and
their development, whereby digital content has to be integrated. Furthermore,
infrastructure of schools has to be improved, as for example 24% of the
primary schools have no WiFi installed in their building. Topic three covers teacher
training and teacher education, concentrating on ideas for the implementation
of digital literacy [
This master-plan also presented an 8-point-concept to foster digital education
that is outlined as the following [
Concerning this 8-point-plan, the Austrian government invested 200 million
Euros until 2022, to guarantee a consistent development [
The new subject \Digital Education" was installed in September 2018 in lower secondary education (grades 5-8), implemented by two to four weekly lessons. If schools want to implement more than 4 hours per week, they have the nance it from the school budget { ministry will not pay for it. School administration can decide if they o er stand-alone subjects or if they implement the curriculum in an integrative way in several other subjects. The Austrian government recommends the following implementation when \Digital Education" is taught as a stand-alone subject (see gure 2).
Of course it is also possible to introduce other concepts. For example it is
possible to start with 1 hour per week stand-alone in grade 5, then switch to
1 hour per week integrated in other subjects in years six to eight. Of course,
schools can also decide to install \Digital Education" in other subjects in year
5 using 1 hour per week and grades six and seven each with 0.5 hours per week
stand-alone. Many other options are possible and common [
\Digital Education" covers digital competences, media competences, as well
as civic education (see gure 3). According to the curriculum, those three topics
should not be taught separately but must be connected to other subject-speci c
elds. The BGBL (Bundesgesetzblatt fur die Republik O sterreich | federal law
gazette of Austria) states that the main aim is to develop students who deal
with media and technology to be more responsible and well-briefed [
The study concentrated on the implementation of the new curriculum \Digital Education" that was introduced in September 2018. The following research question lay out the basis for the survey: How do schools implement the new curriculum? Stand-alone or integrated in other subjects?
The survey was sent to all 133 local public schools whereas 117 teachers were willing to complete the questionnaire. Basic questions formed the rst part of the survey concerning gender, age group, years in service, school type and subjects taught. The next section focused on the implementation of \Digital Education" at schools where we concentrated on the following questions: { How is \Digital Education" implemented at your school? (stand-alone subject/integrative in regular lessons/both) { If \Digital Education" is implemented as a stand-alone subject: who teaches this subject? (computer science teachers/interested teachers/other) { If \Digital Education" is implemented integrative in regular lessons: who is implementing the curriculum? (everyone has to implement the curriculum/only those who are interested implement the curriculum/other) { If \Digital Education" is implemented integrative in regular lessons: How is it checked whether material from the curriculum has been taught? (comment in class register/with a list in the class/not at all/other) { Is there any revision (test, quiz, . . . ) of the students knowledge of the topics of \Digital Education"? (yes/no/other) { If so, in which form? (open question)
The third section was dedicated to the personal experiences of the teachers and wanted to nd out if teachers have already been confronted with the new curriculum. Furthermore, an opportunity was provided to add personal opinion: { Have you already given a lesson on the \Digital Education" curriculum? (yes/no/other) { If yes: which content was covered? (open question) { If so, did you have any di culties implementing the content? (yes/no/other) { Which sources do you use to create \Digital Education" lessons? (digicomp.at/saferinternet.at/easy4me.info/eeducation.at/book \Digitale Grundbildung fur digi.komp8"/other) { How useful do you consider the subject \Digital Education" on a scale from 1 (very useful) to 5 (not useful at all)? { Further comments on the introduction of \Digital Education" (open question)
The question using a scale-rating was implemented applying a ve-point
Likert scale with the options \very useful, rather useful, partly useful, rather not
useful, not useful at all" [
In total there were 117 answered questionnaires while 73 de ned themselves as female, 43 as male, and 1 as diverse. Thirteen people were under 30 years old, 16 between 30 and 39 years, 12 between 40 and 49 years, 58 between 50 and 59, and 18 over 60 years old. Re ecting their years in school service 19 teachers stated under 5 years, 10 teachers 5-10 years, 11 teachers 11-20 years, 21 teachers 21-30 years, and 56 teachers 30 or more years in service.
The subjects taught are displayed in gure 4. Fifty-four stated they teach mathematics, 42 teach foreign languages (English, Italian, Spanish, French, Latin, Greek, or Russian), 36 computer science, 24 biology, 22 German, 21 physics, 21 physical education (PE), 17 history, 16 geography, 15 arts, 10 chemistry, 10 music, 7 religious education, 5 home economics, and 3 teach career guidance. Fourteen named other subjects like ethics, handicraft, natural sciences, accounting, nutrition, CAD, or else. Of course, it was also possible to choose more than one subject, as in Austria most of the teachers cover two elds of expertise. In total 117 teachers picked 317 subjects, so on average one teacher covers approximately 2.7 subjects.
The next section of the questionnaire concentrated on the realization of the curriculum. The rst question explored how \Digital Education" is implemented at school with 4 di erent options, whereas it was only possible to pick one exclusively. 30 teachers (26%) said that a stand-alone subject was introduced, 25 (21%) stated they integrate the curriculum in other subjects, 53 (45%) choose \mixed", and 9 (8%) picked \other"(see gure 5).
51% stated that if the curriculum is implemented as a stand-alone subject, it is taught by computer science teachers, whereas 37% said it is taught by interested ones, and 11% stated both. Nine teachers (8%) described di erent approaches and therefore picked the category \other". One possible alternative was stated as doing workshops or blocked courses, whereas one teacher stated that he/she does not even know if \Digital Education" is taught at school.
When integrated in other subjects, 59% speci ed that each teacher has to
implement the new curriculum, while 41% said that only interested teachers
do that. To verify whether the curriculum has been taught in an integrative
way, 40 people stated that they use comments in the class register, 18 said
that they work with checklists of the topics of the curriculum or the like in
the classroom, and 30 claimed that there is no veri cation at all. Three teachers
picked \other", while they added the answers \competence catalogue", \checklist
in teachers o ce", and \teacher conferences". When looking at assessment, 47
teachers (40%) reported that there is some kind of veri cation of the topics of the
curriculum of \Digital Education", and 70 (60%) claimed that there is no test
at all. 42% out of these 47 teachers who said that there is a veri cation, stated
that they use tests, quizzes, or the like. The governmental tool \digicheck" [
The following part concentrated on personal experience of teachers with the implementation of \Digital Education". Concerning the question if teachers have already held a lesson implementing the curriculum, 66 people (56%) answered \yes", 46 (39%) \no", and 5 (4%) picked \other". Only 11% claimed that they had problems teaching the new content, whereas 80% experienced no complications at all (8% chose \other"). Regarding educational resources, the questionnaire listed the most popular ones known of the eld in Austria. 25% use the website \digicomp.at", 24% \saferinternet.at", 19% \easy4me.info", 17% \eeducation.at", 12% the book \Digitale Grundbildung", and 4% other sources.
The last question wanted to nd out how teachers would assess the new subject concerning usefulness and was implemented using a ve-point LikertScale. Seventy-one teachers (61%) rated the subject \very useful", 31 (26%) \rather useful", 11 (9%) \partly useful", 2 (2%) \rather not useful", and 2 (2%) \not useful at all" (see gure 6). The rating is in the upper section with an arithmetic mean of approximately 1.57. 4.3
Remarkably, the age group of 50-59 years appears most often in this survey (49%). This mirrors the current situation in Austria, as the majority of teachers are close to retirement (64% of the participants are 50 years or older). Henceforth, approximately half of the teachers stated that they have 30 or more years in service.
An interesting fact is that most often computer science teachers are deployed if \Digital Education" is taught as a stand-alone subject. That could be due to the fact that the new curriculum has a close connection to the computer science curriculum in Austria. Still, it would also be possible that teachers with other subjects get involved.
If taught in an integrative way in other subjects, 59% claimed that each teacher has to implement the new curriculum, while 41% said that only interested teachers do so. This is a very interesting nding because legally every teacher has to implement the new curriculum. Still, approximately half of the teachers do not know or at least do not consider that fact.
Another interesting discovery is shown in the answers of the question \Did you have any di culties implementing the content?". 80% of the respondents claimed that they had no problems at all. This is the exact opposite of the tenor in teacher society because most teachers state that they do not know how to implement the curriculum and need further materials. However, when the survey was conducted only 56% already held a lesson in \Digital Education". Maybe those were the ones that had no di culties from the start and the rest still deals with lack of teaching materials and sparse knowledge in the eld. 5
This paper focused on the implementation of the subject \Digital Education" that was introduced in 2018 in Austria. A study was conducted to investigate how schools cope with the launch of the new curriculum. Summarizing, the research question could be answered. It was investigated how schools implement the new curriculum { stand-alone or integrated in other subjects. 26% claimed that they introduced a stand-alone subject, 21% said they integrate the curriculum in other subjects, 45% picked \mixed", and 9 (8%) chose \other".
In summary, further development-steps are: { analyzing the qualitative data of the study { expanding the study nationwide to get broader insight { development of an online teacher training course to support and encourage teachers to install \Digital Education" in their daily lessons at school by concentrating on integrative implementation with computational thinking { evaluating the implemented teacher training course
Henceforth, there is still a lot of e ort that has to be put into the implementation of the curriculum to gain further motivation of the teachers. Especially, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it would be interesting to nd out if the rating of usefulness of the subject \Digital Education" increased.