<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Resident's Views and Perceptions of Urban Green Infrastructure in the Municipality of Paphos, in Cyprus Island</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Paraskevi Karanikola</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Stilianos Tampakis</string-name>
          <email>stampaki@for.auth.gr</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Spyros Galatsidas</string-name>
          <email>sgalatsi@fmenr.duth.gr</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Veronika Andrea</string-name>
          <email>vandrea@fmenr.duth.gr</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Chrisostomos Ioannou</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Zoe Tampaki</string-name>
          <email>ztampaki@for.auth.gr</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Forestry and Management of the Environment and Natural Recourses, Democritus University of Thrace</institution>
          ,
          <country country="GR">Greece</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki</institution>
          ,
          <country country="GR">Greece</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>196</fpage>
      <lpage>204</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The primary goal of urban parks and green spaces is to provide ecosystem services not only for the people that use them but also for the entire urban population. So far, few studies have recorded the views of residents about parks and urban green spaces in Cyprus island. The present paper uses a structured questionnaire to record the views of Paphos residents, concerning the urban parks and green spaces in their municipality. More specifically, the residents were asked to evaluate the local parks and green spaces as regards their number and size, suitable design, safety for children, the variety and care of plants, and the facilities for people with disabilities. They were also asked to record problems such as noise pollution, mess from companion animals and unpleasant odors. The residents' satisfaction regarding the local authorities and their contribution towards improving parks and green spaces was also evaluated to some extent. The residents' answers led to useful proposals that could be adopted by the local authorities to manage the green infrastructure of the city and in order to meet the daily and future needs of the people who visit parks and urban green spaces</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>urban parks</kwd>
        <kwd>green spaces</kwd>
        <kwd>residents' views</kwd>
        <kwd>questionnaire</kwd>
        <kwd>Municipality of Paphos</kwd>
        <kwd>Cyprus island</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        The “urban green infrastructure” as a concept emerged the last two decades
including not only urban green spaces, parks, gardens, woodlands, nature areas, green
streets and avenues [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], but also as the strategically planned networks of high quality
designed, natural and semi-natural areas, including, other environmental features such
as waterbodies, planned and managed to deliver a wide range of ecosystem services to
their users and to protect biodiversity in urban settings [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref3">2, 3</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        The urban green areas constitute indicators of sustainability, which need to be
considered in city development and policy [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]. Developing more sustainable cities is
not just about improving the abiotic and biotic aspects of urban life, it is also about the
social aspects of city life, such as people’s satisfaction, experiences, and perceptions
of their everyday environments [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]. Attention to green spaces of the urban structure is
still poor. Low appreciation of green spaces is also reflected in the cuts of budget of
many towns [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. However, it is argued that urban green infrastructure is a topic of
strategic importance for the quality of life particularly in areas that have become
importantly urbanized [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        For people living in large and dense areas a good quality of life depends largely on
the quality of the urban environment. The influence of urban green areas in
environmental quality is recognized in most developed countries [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Parks also constitute a space for socialization and collaboration between residents.
Another important role of green infrastructure is to strengthen communities and make
cities and neighborhoods more attractive places to live and work in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        It is important, however, to understand the preferences of residents and their
satisfaction in relation to green infrastructure in their neighborhood [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ]. The amount
of green spaces in close distance to places where people live, has a significant relation
to their perceived quality of wellbeing. Thus, this relation might be explained by the
fact that the increased presence of urban green spaces is likely to increase their use by
the public [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Some previous studies carried out in various European countries underline the
influence of urban parks and green spaces on local residents [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ]. Whereas, Cypriot
cities do not have the green areas they should have [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ]. Therefore, there is a lack of
knowledge concerning this subject.
      </p>
      <p>The aim of the present study was to investigate the residents’ perceptions,
preferences and satisfaction about the urban green infrastructure of the municipality of
Paphos in Cyprus island, evaluate the importance of green areas for the residents’
wellbeing and suggest management improvements.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Materials and methods</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>2.1 Study area</title>
        <p>Paphos, is a coastal city in the southwest of Cyprus (34°46′N 32°25′E) and lies on
the Mediterranean coast, about 50 km (30 min) west of Limassol (the biggest port on
the island). The city of Paphos, with more than 35,961 inhabitants, has a limited
number of parks and green spaces.</p>
        <p>
          The lack of urban planning when developing the town of Paphos, coupled with
severe degradation of public spaces, as it took place in the past decades, dictates the
creation of a unified system of green spaces able to improve the micro-climate of the
town, and result in achieving biodiversity preservation goals [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
          ].
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>2.2 Methodology</title>
        <p>
          Simple random sampling was used due to its simplicity, since it requires the least
possible knowledge of the population compared to other methods [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
          ]. The estimation
of the proportion of the population and the estimation of the standard error of the
proportion of the population sp, were given by the formulas of simple random sampling
[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
          ]. Separate pre-sampling of 50 individuals was carried out in the two researches in
order to calculate the size of the sample, which was estimated for every quantitate and
qualitative variable according to the formulas of simple random sampling, where t =
1.96 and e = 5% [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
          ]. The sample was estimated to 400 inhabitants for possibility
(1α)100=95%, e=0,049.
        </p>
        <p>
          Hierarchical Log-linear Analysis was used to examine the four groups of variables.
Prior to the application of Hierarchical Log-linear analysis, the expected frequencies
in the contingency table, were examined [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
          ]. Classes were grouped together in order
to satisfy the criteria mentioned by Tabachick and Fidell [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>
          ]. For the data analysis the
Statistical Package for Social Sciences was used (SPSS 16).
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3 Results</title>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>3.1 Demographic profile of the respondents</title>
        <p>During the interviews, the residents were initially asked about their demographic
profile. As shown in Table 1, they are mainly men, public servants with upper
secondary education.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>3.2 The residents’ well-being is related with the use of parks and green spaces</title>
        <p>
          People living in dense urban areas perceive benefits and enhance their well-being
by visiting green spaces [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>
          ]. According to the first question of the survey, the
residents of Paphos evaluated rigorously the parks and urban green spaces of their
municipality. Half of them (43.5%) found them as mediocre, and about one to four
(26.3%) evaluated them as good and (6.8%) very good or very bad (6.5%).
According to the results most of the residents (34%) visited urban green spaces rarely
and 26.5%, sometimes per month, 21% visit the green spaces sometimes per week and
18.5% more than once per year.
        </p>
        <p>Most of the residents (66%) of Paphos considered that the best season for visiting
green spaces is mainly in spring. Less residents visit parks in summer (19.5%), autumn
(8.8%) and winter (5.8%).</p>
        <p>Their visits were usually short and lasted between 15 and 30 min (32.3%) or 30 and
60 min (32.8%). Less visitors (16.5%) stayed in the park for more than an hour having
leisure time with their children. Some visitors (15%) stop at the park for less than thirty
minutes of isolation and walking, while 3.5% did not answer the question.</p>
        <p>The residents of Paphos were then asked about their satisfaction with their perceived
wellbeing in their municipality and 54.3% stated that they were satisfied, 18.8% very
satisfied and 5% absolutely satisfied. Only one to six (15.3%) of the respondents were
less satisfied or 6.8% not at all satisfied with their wellbeing in the Municipality of
Paphos.</p>
        <p>Through the application of Hierarchical Log-linear analysis, in four cases after the
removal of the third-class degree of correlation, was established that the most
appropriate model was the one which included the impact and the interaction of the
variables divided by two.</p>
        <p>To the variables ‘evaluation of green spaces’, ‘duration of visit’ and ‘satisfaction
with the wellbeing’ Hierarchical Log-linear analysis was applied where we have no
interaction per 3 criteria, because the X2 for Pearson’s test is 0.164 with probability
(p)= 0.921 and because the X2 likelihood ratio is 0.166 with probability (p)= 0.920.
With the application of Hierarchical Log-linear analysis to the data for the municipality
of Paphos the relations are:</p>
        <p>The residents evaluated the parks and urban green spaces as very good or good, they
visit them sometimes per week or per month and they are absolutely or very satisfied
with their quality of life. On the contrary the residents found the park and green spaces
in their municipality as mediocre to very bad, they visit them rarely or sometimes per
year and they are less or not at all satisfied with their wellbeing.</p>
        <p>Additionally, residents were asked to identify their perceived sense of crowding and
the possible disturbance caused by other visitors in the park. Most of them (62.8%)
noted that they enjoyed the presence of other visitors; while, 22% of them were
indifferent about the crowd. Eventually, only 10.5% of the residents specified that they
were disturbed by the presence of other people and a few of them (2.8%) responded
that they were disturbed by “something else”.</p>
        <p>Moreover, parks and green spaces were evaluated as bad places to spend time
“alone”, “with your family”, “your friends” or “your mate” (Table 2).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>3.3 Satisfaction with the existing infrastructures in the parks and green spaces</title>
        <p>The residents were also asked to rate the level of importance and satisfaction with
the existing conditions in the parks and green spaces via a 5-points Likert scale (1
being the most negative value and 5 being the most positive value). Results are
reported in Table 3. Most residents were of the opinion that the number of urban green
spaces in their municipality were either mediocre or insufficient (41.3% και 30%
respectively). The total area of existing green spaces was also assessed as mediocre
or insufficient (38.5% and 42.3% respectively) and also the same assessment took
place concerning their architectural design (42.5% και 28.3%). With more positive
view the residents evaluate the distribution of green spaces in their municipality (41%
mediocre, and 21.5% good), their accessibility (good 39.8% and mediocre 38%), and
their satisfaction with the activities performed by municipality (44% very satisfied
and 24.5% mediocre).</p>
        <p>Regarding the variables ‘number of parks’, ‘distribution of parks’, ‘number of
visitors’ and ‘satisfaction with activities performed by the municipality’ Hierarchical
Log-linear analysis was applied, showing that there is no interaction per 3 or 4 criteria,
because the X2 for Pearson’s test is 0.164 with probability (p)= 0.921 and because the
X2 likelihood ratio is 0.166 with probability (p)= 0.920. With the application of
Hierarchical Log-linear analysis to the data for the municipality of Paphos the relations
are:</p>
        <p>The residents who were absolutely or very satisfied with activities performed by
the municipality, stated that the number of the parks and green spaces were
absolutely or very sufficient, their distribution very good or good and that there
were very big or big numbers of visitors in them.</p>
        <p>On the contrary the residents who were mediocre or not at all satisfied with
activities performed by the municipality’, claim that the numbers in the parks and
green spaces were mediocre to absolutely insufficient, their distribution is
mediocre to very bad within the municipality and they accept mediocre to little
number of visitors.
insufficient</p>
        <p>30.0%
insufficient
25.3%
bad
28.5%
bad
11.3%
small
30.0%
bad
26.0%
bad
23.3%
bad
19.3%
bad
19.3%
bad
28.3%
bad
23.3%
bad
28.3%
absolutely insufficient</p>
        <p>7.0%
absolutely insufficient</p>
        <p>6.0%
very bad</p>
        <p>5.3%
very bad</p>
        <p>3.8%
very small
14.8%
very bad</p>
        <p>6.8%
very bad</p>
        <p>6.0%
very bad</p>
        <p>6.8%
very bad</p>
        <p>8.5%
very bad
16.0%
very bad
13.5%
very bad
20.5%
a little satisfied
28.3%
not at all satisfied
9.5%
Presence of pets
no problem little problem mediocre</p>
        <p>15.8% 22.5% 32.3%
Noise pollution
no problem little problem mediocre</p>
        <p>5.5% 26.0% 38.5%
Unpleasant odors
no problem little problem mediocre</p>
        <p>6.3% 21.3% 36.8%
Satisfaction with activities performed by the municipality
absolutely satisfied very satisfied mediocre
9.5% 24.5% 44.0%
big problem</p>
        <p>23.5%
big problem</p>
        <p>22.3%
big problem</p>
        <p>26.5%
a little satisfied
19.8%
very big problem</p>
        <p>5.8%
very big problem</p>
        <p>7.8%
very big problem</p>
        <p>9.3%
not at all satisfied
2.3%</p>
        <p>The parks of the municipality did not receive good evaluation from the residents
addressing their infrastructure facilities. More specifically, the available
infrastructures in the parks (sits, kiosks etc.) were rated as mediocre (47.3%) and bad
(26%), the cleanliness as mediocre (44.3%) and good (25%), plant care as mediocre
(45%) and good (25%), the children’s playground (48.5%) mediocre (40.5%) and bad,
(28.3%) Sports facilities as mediocre (40.5%) and bad (28.3%), safety for children
were also evaluated as mediocre (40.8%) and bad (28.3%) and the facilities for people
for disabilities were assessed as mediocre 36.5% and bad 28.3% (Table 3).</p>
        <p>To the variables ‘cleanliness’, ‘plant care’, ‘Safety for children’ and ‘Sports
facilities’ Hierarchical Log-linear analysis was applied and showed that there were no
interaction per 3 or 4 criteria, because the X2 for Pearson’s test is 2.741 with probability
(p)= 0.740 and because the X2 likelihood ratio is 2.862 with probability (p)= 0.721. the
relations are:
• The residents stated as very good and good the safety for children; while, they
found that the cleanliness, the plant care and the sport facilities are very good and
good.
• On the contrary the residents who stated that the safety for children was mediocre
to very bad, evaluated the plant care, cleanliness and sports facilities as mediocre
to very bad.</p>
        <p>According to the evaluation of the problems in the parks the residents regard
unpleasant odors, the presence of animals and noise pollution were mainly mediocre
(Table 3).</p>
        <p>For the variables ‘their perceived sense of crowding’, ‘the presence of animals’,
‘noise pollution’, and unpleasant odours’ Hierarchical Log-linear analysis was applied
representing no interaction per 3 or 4 criteria. There is no interaction per 4or 3 criteria,
because the X2 for Pearson’s test is 3.995 with probability (p)= 0.780 and due to the
fact that the X2 likelihood ratio is 4.049 with probability (p)= 0.774. the relations are:</p>
        <p>The residents who stated that the people around amused them, found that problems
like noise pollution, the presence of companion animals and the unpleasant odors are
mediocre to not regarded as problems.</p>
        <p>On the contrary the residents who consider that the people around disturbed or are
indifferent found the problems like noise pollution, the presence of companion animals
and the unpleasant odours, as very big or big.</p>
        <p>
          The city of Paphos has a limited number of parks and green spaces because of the
absent of proper urban planning when the city Paphos was under development [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>
          This study offers a general understanding of public perceptions regarding urban
green spaces and parks from the residents’ point of view. The fact that most of the
residents evaluated the green infrastructure of their city as mediocre, bad or very bad
is an indicator that there is a problem encountered also in other European countries
like Italy [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>Half of the residents stated that were satisfied or little satisfied with their life in the
city. Furthermore, the findings revealed that the residents’ well-being is related to their
satisfaction with urban green infrastructures. The residents that considered themselves
satisfied with their life, visited parks more frequently and for longer periods than the
residents that were not satisfied with their life. Therefore, encouraging people to visit
green spaces and parks can make them feel more satisfied with their lives.</p>
        <p>Through the Hierarchical Log-linear analysis, it became evident that the existing
green spaces were mediocre to insufficient in number, size, design, and distribution
for about the half of the study population.</p>
        <p>
          The results of the present study can be used as a valid tool in the planning, design
and management of urban green spaces, thus promoting the adoption of participatory
processes in decision making by the local authorities [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>
          ].
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Parker</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Zingoni de Baro,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.E.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2019</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Green infrastructure in the urban environment: a systematic quantitative review</article-title>
          .
          <source>Sustainability</source>
          <year>2019</year>
          (
          <volume>11</volume>
          ),
          <fpage>3182</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Terkenli</surname>
            <given-names>T.S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bell</surname>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tošković</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dubljević-Tomićević</surname>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Panagopoulos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Straupe</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kristianova</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Straigyte</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>O'Brien</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. Živojinović I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <article-title>Tourist perceptions and uses of urban green infrastructure: An exploratory cross-cultural investigation</article-title>
          .
          <source>Urban Forestry and Urban Greening</source>
          <volume>49</volume>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <fpage>126624</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ferreira</surname>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Barreira</surname>
            <given-names>A.P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Loures</surname>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Antunes</surname>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Panagopoulos</surname>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2020</year>
          )
          <article-title>Stakeholders' Engagement on Nature-Based Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review</article-title>
          .
          <source>Sustainability</source>
          <year>2020</year>
          ,
          <volume>12</volume>
          , 640; doi:10.3390/su12020640.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Berte</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Panagopoulos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
          <article-title>Enhancing city resilience to climate change by means of ecosystem services improvement: A SWOT analysis for the city of Faro, Portugal</article-title>
          .
          <source>Int. J. Urban Sustain. Dev</source>
          .
          <year>2014</year>
          ,
          <volume>6</volume>
          , p.
          <fpage>241</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>253</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chiesura</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          )
          <article-title>The role of urban parks for the sustainable city</article-title>
          .
          <source>Landscape Urban Planning</source>
          <volume>68</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ), p.
          <fpage>129</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>138</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tyrväinen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pauleit</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Seeland</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>de Vries</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          )
          <article-title>Benefits and uses of Urban forests and trees</article-title>
          . In: Konijnendijk,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Nilsson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Randrup</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Schipperijn</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>J</surname>
          </string-name>
          . (Eds.),
          <source>Urban Forests and Trees</source>
          . Springer, Berlin, p.
          <fpage>81</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>114</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Karanikola</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Panagopoulos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tampakis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Karipidou-Kanari</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
          <article-title>A perceptual study of users' expectations of urban green infrastructure in Kalamaria, municipality of Greece, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal</article-title>
          ,
          <volume>27</volume>
          (
          <issue>5</issue>
          ), p.
          <fpage>568</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>584</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Moskell</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Broussard</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gretchen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          )
          <article-title>Examining motivations and recruitment strategies for urban forestry volunteers</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Cities and Environment</source>
          <volume>3</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ), p.
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>28</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sherer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          )
          <article-title>The Benefits of Parks: Why America Needs More City Parks</article-title>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Open</given-names>
            <surname>Space</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Published by The Trust for Public Land</article-title>
          , Sun Francisco.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sanesi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chiarello</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          )
          <article-title>Residents and urban green spaces: The case of Bari, Urban Forestry</article-title>
          and
          <source>Urban Greening</source>
          <volume>4</volume>
          :
          <fpage>125</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>134</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schipperijn</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stigsdotter</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>U.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Randrup</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Troelsen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          )
          <article-title>Influences on the use of urban green space - A case study in Odense, Denmark</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Urban Forestry and Urban Greening</source>
          <volume>9</volume>
          , p.
          <fpage>25</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>32</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sanesi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lafortezzaa</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bonnes</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Carrus</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          )
          <article-title>Comparison of two different approaches for assessing the psychological and social dimensions of green spaces</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Urban Forestry and Urban Greening</source>
          <volume>5</volume>
          , p.
          <fpage>121</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>129</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Karanikola</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Panagopoulos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tampakis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
          <article-title>Weekend visitors' views and perceptions at an urban national forest park of Cyprus during summertime</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism</source>
          <volume>17</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ), p.
          <fpage>112</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>121</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Georgi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. Vissilia A.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Koutsolambros</surname>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
          <article-title>Pafos Cultural Capital of Europe 2017: Landscape interventions in the urban fabric as a tourist development tool</article-title>
          . 51st
          <source>World Congress of the International Federation of Landscape Architects, IFLA</source>
          <year>2014</year>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Buenos</given-names>
            <surname>Aires</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Argentina p.
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>8</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kalamatianou</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2000</year>
          ) Social Statistics, Methods of One-Dimensional
          <string-name>
            <surname>Analysis</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>The Economic Publications</source>
          , Athens.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Filias</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pappas</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Antonopoulou</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zarnari</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Magganara</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Meimaris</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nikolakopoulos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Papachristou</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Perantzaki</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sampson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Psychogios</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2000</year>
          )
          <article-title>Introduction of the Methodology and</article-title>
          Techniques of Social Research, Gutenberg Social Library, Athens.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          17.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pagano</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gauvreau</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2000</year>
          )
          <article-title>Elements of Biostatistics</article-title>
          . Ellin Publications, Athens.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          18.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Siardos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1999</year>
          )
          <article-title>Methods of Multivariate Statistical Analysis</article-title>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Part</surname>
            <given-names>I</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Investigating Relationships between Variables, Zitis Publications</article-title>
          , Thessaloniki.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          19.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tabachick</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fidell</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1989</year>
          )
          <article-title>Using Multivariate Statistics</article-title>
          , 2nd ed.
          <source>Harper and Row</source>
          , New York.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          20.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lafortezza</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Carrus</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sanesi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Davies</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          )
          <article-title>Benefits well-being perceived by people visiting green spaces in periods of heat stress</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Urban Forestry &amp; Urban Greening</source>
          ,
          <volume>8</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ), p.
          <fpage>97</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>108</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          21.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Panagopoulos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          )
          <article-title>Linking forestry, sustainability and aesthetics</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Ecological Economics</source>
          ,
          <volume>68</volume>
          (
          <issue>10</issue>
          ), p.
          <fpage>2485</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2489</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>