<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>A Method Comparison Study Between Open-Source and Industrial Environmental Loggers - Abstract</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Evmorfia P. Bataka</string-name>
          <email>bataka@uth.gr</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Christos T. Nakas</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Laboratory of Biometry, Dept of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Volos</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="GR">Greece</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>498</fpage>
      <lpage>499</lpage>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>Summary</p>
      <p>Open-source software and hardware can be implemented almost in every field that
includes technology and automations. We will address the issues of Agreement,
Reliability, Precision and Sustainability of open-source devices against industrial
equipment during an agricultural experiment at the experimental greenhouses of the
University of Thessaly, Velestino, Greece. Open-source alternatives are low cost,
userfriendly that can be applied to the equipment according to the needs of the scientist
and a huge community that supports the users. On the other hand, industrial choices
are, most of the time, rigid when it comes to modifications and the cost forbids
conducting experiments that require specialized equipment. However, industrial
equipment is fully tested and reliable. Agreement and Similarity analysis will be
performed between an open-source Arduino compatible environmental data logger and
an industrial weather station.</p>
      <p>Agreement and Similarity evaluation is the most efficient and trustworthy method
comparison analysis when it comes to comparing two or more devices, methods or
treatments. Many publications that compare devices, methods or treatments use the
correlation coefficient, MSE or other metrics that have been proven to be misleading.
Furthermore, the usual metrics do not reveal the source of disagreement, while
combining plots like Bland-Altman, Trellis, Agreement, Total Bias, Percentage
Agreement and MSE, enriches an agreement study and provides a complete review
about both sources of agreement and disagreement. The most appropriate agreement
and similarity measures to be used are TDI (total deviation index) and CCC
(concordance correlation coefficient) but others will also be investigated.</p>
      <p>We create a guide that provides all measures, plots and methods of Agreement and
Similarity with their corresponding advantages and disadvantages, that will help
researchers analyze and further improve the quality and robustness of relevant research.
Our work also addresses methods of implementing this research to STEM learning in
order to make environmental monitoring processes easy and understandable to a wide
range of audiences and allow them to get involved in the process of
construction/evaluation of open-source devices and make cross curricular integration
possible. After a pilot experiment for the comparison of the two devices measuring air
temperature, the evidence revealed heteroscedastic data. Solutions include longitudinal,
mixed-effects and measurement error models. This is a work in progress.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          JEL Codes:
          <volume>C51</volume>
          ;
          <fpage>031</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>